the position of the united states of america, its allies, china and its supporters, and russia, which wants to be the leader of the anti-colonial movement. well, this is the role that putin sees as possible. at least he did not say no, and the main thing is that i noticed that. years ago, there are some symptoms. now i am not talking about the assessment from the point of view of a doctor, i am not a doctor, but google what is a disorder of a human being, just look at the symptoms of the behavior of the disorder and from what i just looked on google as doctors it is said from nine putin has 6 symptoms and that is why it is treated. it is treated. well, it is clear that the return to the perception of the world is treated by the armed forces of ukraine, but it is better

for a psychiatrist to have medical ones. what means is this with what we have to live with? it means that this person can be irrational in his actions and in with his planning, he creates his own world, and in this world, as he said, why on my day, the people once again confirmed that we are one people. do you know why? because the russians came from novgorod to kyiv, and then these lands were transferred somewhere. he was just thinking about this, he put his vision of historical development as the basis of his vision of historical development, which means that they do not support him. no one told him, do you understand what is happening ? to talk to him, they bring cartridges to him, this is historical memory, as it is advantageous for his absolutely final artificial model

, and in this model he lives and in this model lives the russian environment, and well, his environment and the russian people, and this is what we have to live with there is only one conclusion: without putinization, where the fascism of russia will not work, it was not enough to buy the territory of ukraine, should it have come to our borders, or should we understand that this is a dangerous group of people and that we are not fighting against putin, we are fighting against russia, against the russians - this is a ukrainian-russian war not only by governments - this is a war between peoples, unfortunately, unfortunately, this is what putin provoked and what he has brought the world to, we will have to win in this war and we must win so that russia is deprived of any opportunity to further dictate its terms racketeers of gopniks and people like putin should get off the stage as soon as possible and on whose side is it, if i may ask a question, and what are we on the side of in

your opinion, china after the re-election is all ringing on the one hand, there is a statement by mr. m. himself about the fact that they want to cooperate with the united states of america and to deepen cooperation from the other side, today the minister of foreign affairs of china says that cooperation with russia will be established and this support will take place, what role does china want to play, considering that, well, it is obviously so a country that is a world leader, but has not yet expressed such a specific position regarding the actions of the russian federation. i read shchedrin's speech, it's 75 pages long. you can read his speech at the congress.

one field will be led by china with its e-e partners, and the other by the united states, and that it was announced today with the united states to discuss the peaceful coexistence of these two systems, and the first such attempt will most likely be in the coming weeks in november in indonesia is at the summit of the g20 or there is a group of 20 countries. that is their desire to bring out the military plan in the economic and, most importantly, in the political plan that the chinese system must show its viability in the rivalry with the usa. russia is not there in russia . this is a tool now for china to solve the strengthening of the interaction between the states and everything that they are planning in our studio. question mykola knyazhytskyi. i understand that it is difficult to answer

this question, but it is interesting because it is not was in the report si but it is interesting where everyone sees ukraine in the part that is in the sphere of influence of the usa as a superpower, how does he see it or in the part that is in the sphere of influence of china, it is obvious, for example, that he sees russia or belarus in the sphere of influence of china, can ukraine too well, there actually isn’t a single country, it’s in the chinese style not to name a single specific non-country or a specific such exact plan, uh, it doesn’t matter where they see china, it’s important where we see ourselves, i don’t think we’ll be able to sit down on this stretch between the united states and china to us you will have to make your choice, and this choice is about security issues. we are with the united states and nato allies and the european union. regarding trade, we can develop normal relations with china, that is,

you asked a good question, but there is no such answer as to where china sees us, but you know, you should ask. probably our leadership in general. well, where is mine? we will see everything. well, i have three specific questions. what changes do we have in our strategy now for china ? a temporary official at the level of the deputy head of the chinese ministry of foreign affairs is being called to the carpet. this is not normal and the third question. and where is our friendship group ? mykoly, i want to ask you. maybe you know where our friendship group with china is in the parliament. well, i will tell you that the friendship group with china in parliament is one of the largest, it exists as far as i remember, mr. surkis is the head and there are co-chairmen

from the servant of the people. it seems to me that there are even two and economic relations with taiwan, we created this association, but the chairman of the verkhovna rada does not read it as it is required by the law from the place of creation of this association, because they say it can worsen our relations with china and they will immediately become even more friends with russia and belarus will attack us, which, from my point of view, is a big mistake because taiwan is also a democratic country, which, together with the united states of america, pay great attention to the attitude towards the solution of the taiwan issue on the part of its allies and since we want to be so an ally, definitely. this should have been done a long time ago, and regarding the work of the friendship group with china, i think it should be a question for psurkis and other members of the group, well, it is very serious if you

turn to mr. surkis at these moments. unfortunately, it so happened that under yanukovych, they did this a statement on strategic partnership and then all the people who worked with china are more, er, now those parties are banned and unfortunately, if you look at the story, how it stopped at that moment, now we have absolutely zero relations with china. unfortunately, this is not well, at least at the level of the academy of sciences, it would be necessary to continue these relations at the level of parliaments, so at least have information from them, what do they really think, because this is a big country that will influence the world, but i emphasize once again that our pagans do not give there must be a question, we will win if we win and when we win china taiwan will not leave of course you can still apply there is another co-chairman of the friendship group with china this is mr. trukhun oleksandr, also a well-known people's deputy - we have mr. surkis, mr. trukhin, there is even mr. halimon too

from the party of the servant of the people, these sinologists are so well-known in the verkhovna rada, that is, they are in this friendship group, but i want to tell you that we remember the statements of mr. rogami, who spoke about the fact that the chinese communist party is an example for us of what to do with to actively cooperate with him, and the fact that, among other things, the creation of an inter- factional group friendship of inter-factional group of cultural ties with taiwan is not announced. i think it says that there is a great dialogue between china and ukraine and we remember not so long ago international meeting of mr. kuliba with his colleague from china, who actively appeared in us, so i think that there is some kind of dialogue with china, but it is just not enough. so i will once again refer to one phrase from this big press conference of putin, who said that the next decade. he thinks that it will be the most difficult since the end of the second world war , the revolutionary most difficult, and so on. well, i

understood that at some subconscious level, putin expects to live another 10 years, and probably about reigning for 10 years. in the context of the possible geopolitical changes that await us as a state of ukraine, you understand. because we are supported by a large coalition of states, but these are all elected democracies, unlike china, and china, unlike the russian federation, about the congressional elections that will be held in november. what is your forecast regarding the extent to which the position of the united states can be adjusted, in particular regarding the finances and support of our state, the strengthening of the influence of the republican party, this is the second time in the context of this difficult decade do you believe in any tribunal that can wait for putin on his film that will provide and implement only in ukraine and the huge international community as well, come on, i

generally try to answer honestly for today i do not see the possibility of dragging a person to the tribunal which is now seriously considering his participation in the group of 20 in indonesia, well , how can you consider the tribunal, which really in holland has already announced what will happen and at the same time, the participation of the tribunal will be over him if he manages to get there, that is, his physical life can simply will end sooner than the possibilities in the world to actually get him for the tribunal. the fact is that for this he has enough points of bunkers beyond the urals. if the regime in russia changed, he would be extradited, and it could be that he will end up somewhere in russia's bunkers and the terminal will not wait. but i definitely believe in a tribunal for these war crimes, it is not necessarily for the physical punishment of a person, yes. that is, it should be a war

crimes tribunal and then appropriate payments to ukrainians for what they suffered, well, you cannot cover these payments with anything payments, the loss of people, and that's why i'm still looking at it skeptically, because i don't see what's happening right now , so that tanks are coming to us. missiles are coming to us . airplanes are coming to us. uh, and such gopnic behavior, that is , unfortunately, the world does not show strength yet, why did i pay attention to this because in the states, after all, what you mr. voytenko asked well, let's s- anyway, we're just waiting for everything to be there - there will still be bipartisan support elections are elections, and after the elections, you and i know that the rhetoric changes somewhat. and on november 8, the results will be tallied, and there are already some interesting groups of congressmen who appeared, and then

they disappeared, because you, er, discovered that this is not necessary doing it now already shows that it is coordinated, after all, there is some kind of reaction inside washington, so i think that it will not affect the control of the flow of funds, the financial sector, the budget of ukraine, or any projects to restore it impact it will have a serious impact no the money will not come here without american control for the reconstruction of ukraine or the reconstruction of ukraine there but i believe that now it is a big mistake to think about reconstruction, no matter how unpopular it may sound , we must think now about urgent measures to maintain the viability of the ukrainian economy in first of all, because after the attacks on the electricity supply, there will be a gas cut, this is clearly the second step and there will be an attempt to destroy the possibilities of ukrainian business in general, up to

opportunities to produce e-e products that are critically important for the population, this is where we need to concentrate our efforts now. that is, our priority is security, stability of the mechanism of state management, and the interaction of the branches of government. and only then will we think about reconstruction. i wanted to, but i absolutely agree with you. correct, but i would like to return to the question that was raised in 2014 by the ministry of foreign affairs regarding the withdrawal of the russian federation from the un security council by how much you still today already consider that this scenario is still possible and how in your opinion it is possible to implement it or follow it is actually more hypothetical than practical the process is official

the united states has taken a more active position in supporting our desire but for today i am without - i see it as more realistic to deprive russia of the right of veto in those cases when it is an aggressor country. that is, it is realistic to take away the seat of the un. there are even mechanisms, but then it will be restored there in a month, that is, i see that it could be done as soon as the left of the nation is on the place of the un, it is time to create a new organization right now, it won't happen and it's not worth it. i believe that our key resources have been

kissed by the people of this country. well, and the third is that russia will no longer encroach on our territory. well, what if someone will fight, our line, our representative, to think about the red ball reform for your position, so that they are a question of another country - it is the sovereign right of the ukrainian people to determine where and with whom we should be in the end, this is what we are fighting for today, but the question is somewhat different, you know i i am convinced that the next three weeks, including the statement of the leader of china, is such a certain geopolitical positioning before the g20 meeting in indonesia, including i am convinced that this is also a certain

positioning of russia, and i understand that a lot will depend on the meeting and the negotiations on the further course of development events inside our state on the battlefield. how do you predict whether putin will participate in this meeting with the president of ukraine? as a sanctioned representative, but definitely not putin, putin, a war criminal. it is not normal when a war criminal participates on an equal footing in events of this level regarding the meeting of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, he will participate. i hope and i do not understand

why they raise the question of participation, as it was publicly announced before the participation of putin and zelensky, well , in general, the questions are not related, and the president of ukraine should participate, because ukraine now plays such a role that, well, twenty, what is considered all these risks and ukraine's role is important, that's why the chinese-american meeting is important, first of all, including for us, and considering the agenda, one thing is very important to us, so that , for example, everything in the discussion does not return to the humanitarian space well, what about the grain agreement, let's get the extension of the grain agreement at any cost. and the fact that a third of our electricity supply infrastructure is destroyed. no one is talking, that is, somehow we are

losing the initiative. we are losing the initiative. let's be honest. putin has now taken it over in recent weeks. we need to return the initiative and the meeting of the twenty -crucial group. the key moment now is that there should be a boycott of putin's participation. this is a joke if i'm not mistaken, but at least they sent me that from britain that today the decision of the pike perch is a new prime minister. the british prime minister said that he will oppose canada. christia freelance said that there will be a boycott . the answer to your question is this, i don’t see any subject at all. now there is no conversation at the highest level between ukraine and russia. there is no negotiation because one side wants your complete destruction, like putin, and capitulation, and

you want to survive. well, what conversations are being conducted by our armed forces, they are the best negotiators in the studio right now, for supporting this conversation, because many of the topics that we had planned for ourselves just came up. the extremely respectable ambassador of ukraine to the usa in 15-19 years and the chairman of the board of the ukrainian crisis media center was with us via skype, he shared his thoughts and messages, which are now important mykola buchyn , i have another question for you. yesterday we heard this story when one of the african leaders who visited ukraine can we now see this footage. he just in his address allegedly handed over to president zelensky an address from putin whom he met before

because they say that somehow it is necessary to agree something with someone, to sit down and talk about something. maybe we will listen to this african leader. let's have him in russia with president putin, who asked me to convey a message to you to talk with you, and really based on the fact that there is a direct dialogue very important for our further actions, i can also say that this is very important in the context of our food security and the export of fertilizers and other products to african countries, and in this case, solving this issue will also contribute the establishment of more friendly and brotherly relations between our countries, as well as the establishment of a certain dialogue, the softening of the situation in russia's contacts with ukraine, well, zelenskyi said something about what one and with whom to negotiate with whom, with whom to talk without running away from what is understood by volodymyr zelenskyi there can be no negotiations, but what was it at all, because already today hmm, putin's press secretary piskovska said that no one sent any messages to anyone, that is, that there was no such thing, that it

was all just an initiative of this african leader somewhere there quietly say, and this guy must have confused everything, and the young man just now, valery chalyy said absolutely correctly about the fact that, in fact , there are no grounds for negotiations between ukraine and russia, because in fact, you absolutely agree if someone wants you to destroy what negotiations can be, and in principle, it is really only on the battlefield that things are happening now that will determine the configuration of the negotiations , they will definitely take place at some point. will they be in a bilateral format? will they be in the format they will not be multilateral, and of course now the status of the negotiations will depend on the extent to which the events on the battlefield will develop. when they will take place, how realistic they will be, and so on, that is, now there is no reason for negotiations in ukraine, and russia is not ready to conduct real negotiations, therefore that, as many analysts

note, russia's strategic positions have not changed, it still wants to destroy ukraine, it is no longer ready to put up with the existence of ukraine as an independent state, or at least as a state that is not is in its sphere or of political influence, therefore, in this case, if there are talks about certain negotiations, then these will be pseudo-negotiations that will be used to distract attention for a certain operational pause. that is, we must understand that now, in fact, russia is beginning to lose the initiative and lose on the battlefield and in fact now it is important for russia to get a certain strategic pause in the rest area so that it is possible to prepare partially mobilized people there, it is possible to receive some additional support, including military support, from its allies of the most democratic camp and uh. we know very well in the history of russia, whether it was the ussr or soviet

russia, whether it was the russian empire, uh, actually russia always used negotiations in order to mobilize and then deliver another insidious blow, so in this case, i probably agree somewhere with mr. oleg in terms of the fact that those conversations from a certain private format grew into a public format and turned out to be such a peculiar case when it was announced that well, as if even so you know, it sounded like putin directly wants and is looking for tam anyone who will be able to reach the ukrainian authorities there, and this has already forced russia to react , in particular piskov, and in a certain way even to justify itself. well, i don't know. it would be a very big mistake in my opinion if ukraine now agreed to any negotiations. thanks to god , we clearly declare that we will not do this, and you know certain negotiations, they would be, and how can i tell you, they would be a certain form of legitimization of russia's return to international politics, because if ukraine started again

to introduce certain negotiations, according to putin, there would be certain arguments that, look, we are working on peace, that is, if ukraine agrees to negotiations, it means that it also understands that it is wrong to a certain extent, and this, again, to a certain extent, would minimize this international isolation which is now actually driven by russia and its leader vladimir putin , so i think that we should understand that our main task is to win on the battlefield. and after russia will have no options and it will finally lose, then negotiations will unequivocally, but they will be, let's say, in the format that will be beneficial to ukraine. roman, there is one thing with which i 100% agree with valery oleksiyovych, the guy, and there is something with which i agree that the continuation of the topic of negotiations is absolutely not open to doubt, the ukrainian authorities have clearly taken

the position that there can be no negotiations with terrorists and there is no one to talk to, but that it is very important that this boycott of the visit of the biggest terrorist of modern times, putin, to indonesia should be implemented because it is very important to prevent here is this violation of the rule, nothing about ukraine without ukraine, and i think that in such formats and i think that this is one of the plans of the president of the russian federation to encourage, if he holds a countermeasure , then we probably have diplomatic white spots in latin america as well and in the near future in order to encourage victory through them, that is, none of our partners should have any doubts about what was already said in this studio, we need weapons now, we need help now, and not any attempts to imprison someone for table negotiations with the biggest terrorist and what i don't

agree with. we have to be very careful with our statements, we said that you can't give hm answers, what a school and hmmm, i think that many of us could say teh hm what he thinks but it can harm the overall situation to the general picture, here is what was said that this is not a war of the armed forces of ukraine against the armed forces of the russian federation, i agree, i even agree that it is a war between states, but i do not agree that it is an international war and this narrative cannot be replicated because this is what putin wants to do, that it is becoming a huge country, that it is a mobilization resource, many millions of bayonets, poorly armed, well- equipped, you can relate to this in any way, but the president of ukraine also spoke about this. we remember the speech of the minister of defense of ukraine that we we are fighting against morbid imperialist ambitions

and against the bearers of these ambitions, not against those people who, let's say, disagree with the policy of the modern military-political leadership of the russian federation, with your permission. putin himself says that we are one people and he says now that it is a civil war and when he was recorded . he does not say about this partially, but he says that he is even international, he seems to be in the west, ah, mykola , we are fighting with them, obviously, different people in every nation we understand this very well, but nations are responsible for their leaders and for what is happening, and that is why the state has its own as the president. village and repented and chose to go there, so the russian people will have to atone for this war a lot more because they tolerate putin and

they mostly support putin, obviously there are those who flee and there are those who do not support it, but the people's responsibility for the actions of their country always exists just as our responsibility can be for the fact that we were not fully prepared for this war and very easily imagined it is not only the responsibility of politicians, it is also our responsibility this is what happens in society taras batenko i only i want you to say that we don't need to call putin a spy and the former head of the fsb before he became the prime minister and then the president of russia, a person who actually worked for the enemies all his life, and i think that when many but what we see is all testing his pen as an intelligence officer, so you named an african leader - he is the president of guinea-bissau. i think that few of us in the audience have heard of this country. can you imagine the president of genna ibisau, one of the smallest countries in the world and the edge of africa, came with a huge as a mediating function, this kind of black pope reconciles two wary people. no, i don’t, i don’t

spoil it, just like two warring countries. what’s more, i paid attention to how he voted . the state supported the territorial integrity of the state, my desire is definitely straining. i don't want any international scandal right now. federation, because at first he did not run as president, he came to putin and then suddenly appeared in kyiv and for well and said on friendly terms with president zelensky that putin wants a peaceful dialogue. it is already possible some kind of conspiratorial er