uh, reconcile two big two careful ones no, i’m not spoiling just how to clean up two warring countries well, moreover, i paid attention to how she voted, he was obsessing over these meetings of the general person and the un, which was determined in its resolution regarding the territorial goals of the state, she supported the territorial integrity of the state, i definitely have a desire. i don't want any international scandal right now. of course, this is definitely some kind of domestic preparation of the russian federation, because at first the president ran to heaven and wrote the example of putin, and then suddenly appeared in kyiv and for well, president zelenskyi said on a friendly basis that putin wants a peaceful dialogue . let's just say that you know such tentacles as putin. well, for every day. a lot of xenia sobchak escaped. so it's already possible some kind of conspiratorial good evening from

ukraine from a studio in london. russia is hitting the energy infrastructure, how to defend putin talked about the invasion of ukraine as a civil war and accused the ukrainians of creating a nuclear incident and does russia have the ability to create a dirty bomb, what are the options of this bomb. it is frightening, and how can russia use such a dirty bomb against ukraine, western experts say. at night, the russian military struck the energy infrastructure of ukraine, so the ukrainian authorities called to prepare for additional power outages

. drone strikes were reported in the kyiv region near zaporizhzhia. local authorities damaged objects. civil infrastructure , and by the way, as general gromov, a representative of the general staff, noted, russia strikes only against civil infrastructure and not against the military goals of the latter according to the ukrainian military, over the past week, russia has fired fifty missiles over ukraine , all strikes were focused on the destroyed objects of the energy infrastructure, in addition to the missiles from october 19, the russians also used 114 drones that struck both civilian and military infrastructure, but the russians also launch drone missiles less compared to the previous weeks . this is how the ukrainian military notes that with the onset of cold weather, instead of freezing ukraine , it appears to be one of the strategies of the russian of the military in this war, when they are defeated at the front, what do western analysts think about the war in ukraine now, as

winter approaches, both sides are trying to prepare the ground when it comes to military action, it is always better to promise little and do a lot in business, russia clearly determined for a long-term perspective ukraine is naturally determined to defend itself and it is ready to do everything possible to return its territories so in which direction is the conflict moving, first of all it is a struggle for territory despite recent successes of ukrainians in the east, their advance there they slowed down precisely in the south, they now seem to have concentrated their efforts in the direction of kherson ukraine achieved success there, exhausting the russians in much the same way as they did outside kyiv, disrupting logistics routes, destroying command and control structures, exhausting separate groups

of troops, ukraine's goal is to recapture kherson russia began to evict civilians, it is not clear how many of them voluntarily and withdraw troops, we see that putin is trying to buy as much time as possible to equip the recruits transfer the equipment as many tanks as possible from the soviet reserves and modernized tanks to the front, but this battle is not only fought on the ground, at the beginning of the war, many people thought that the russians would quickly rule in the sky, and this did not happen, so russia did not succeed, and one of their most impressive the failure was that they allowed ukraine to control its own airspace and this gave it a huge chance to withstand the russians very very cunning tactics they use cheap iranian drones to

deplete ukraine's air defense resources because the missiles they have to use to shoot down cheap iranian drones are very expensive. that's why the fight for international support is vital for ukraine. weapons in the hope of forcing european countries to withdraw their support for kyiv, but it did not work, but of course there are more of them on putin's side, but one in particular was that europeans will not survive the winter because of the gas war , now we see that gas prices are falling, most countries report that they have enough storage, so he hoped that winter would change the game, but although europe will manage to provide light this winter

, most of ukraine has already died, it is a battle for the rear, the russians are trying to break the will of the ukrainian people by targeting the energy infrastructure, about 40% of our energy infrastructure was damaged. i am now in the center of kyiv. if i look out the window, it is pitch black, so the only houses at the moment, who have electricity and what generator equipment for russia, for the risks are hardly from attacks on its territory, but from the population, angered by forced mobilization and undermining of the power of the ruler, humiliated by defeats on the battlefield, only a nation cannot survive military defeat after defeat and then remain the same what kind of supreme leader are you? russia has tested its strategic nuclear weapons. so whether president

putin will cross this line is one of the big unpredictable questions that will determine the course of this war in 8 months after the invasion of ukraine, putin called the war a war a civil war, such a remark was made by him at the valdai forum. but putin used this term from the submission of the forum host, who asked whether the so-called special military operation could be considered a civil war , to which putin answered partially, taking into account his with the words the unity of the peoples of russia and ukraine, he said the unity of the peoples, but in different countries. but before that, putin said that the main task of the so -called russian military operation is to help donbass and even later said that it was russia that created ukraine, so only russia can guarantee its independence, there are many such statements that do not correspond to reality, we will talk about the

reaction of the ukrainian authorities to all these statements later, and now a little more about putin's speech on valdai he spoke again about treachery of the west, the injustice of the world domination of the united states, then, by the way, he admitted that russia suffered certain losses due to the war, economic losses, but still, what was new today in putin's speech, is his rhetoric changing, he analyzes the correspondent of the russian service of the bbc, serhii gorashko, this was a usual speech for vladimir putin in the last few months. he again said that the west is trying to create a unipolar world, while russia supports multipolarity. he said again that the west is trying to cancel

the attack on russia, and now my colleague, the correspondent , is joining us. snow is a danger to you from kyiv, zhanna, we will talk with you about the reaction of the ukrainian authorities to the entire statement made by putin, but first, all the same, about the rhetoric, if

compare putin's current rhetoric, for example, with his nightly speeches before the invasion of ukraine, something is changing, er, there is nothing to talk about. surely, in essence, er, this speech by putin really, as our colleague said before, is no different from what he says earlier, moreover, it is hardly possible to talk about any significant changes, and even compared to his already well-known historical and historical speeches before the invasion of ukraine in february of this year, two theses are important for ukraine. the first is what putin continues to say about that it is the west that is responsible for the outbreak of the war in ukraine, that it is the west that led to the military escalation on the territory of ukraine. that is, we see that and further, at least for the domestic public, the russian president

creates a parallel reality in his speeches, which in in no way corresponds to the fact corresponds to the reality and the second point, which is also news for us, we hear again that in the picture of the world of vladimir putin, ukraine is not a subject, is not a state as such, but cannot be a player and cannot be an interlocutor at possible peace negotiations , or at least an equal interlocutor, that is, in fact, it follows from what volodymyr kuzin said today that if he dared to engage in serious international negotiations, the leaders of the united states, great britain, and nato representatives, but not ukraine , should be at the negotiating table ukraine itself has been holding back the advance of his army for 8 months and today is the only country in the world that is generally capable and such that we dared

to challenge vladimir putin's kremlin and by the russian regime, but is it actually ready for negotiations, for example, even earlier commentators from the american analytical center, the institute for the study of war, wrote about the fact that putin's rhetoric shows that he is not interested in negotiations with ukraine, in negotiations with the west, putin is interested, that's how it sounds today from his speech so we heard in his speech that russia is ready for an equal conversation with the west. it is difficult to say what exactly the russian president means in this case, but hmm, about what for sure we can say that if he talks about this, it is about negotiations on russian terms, on the one hand, and on the other hand, before the attack on

ukraine in the same technological speeches that we mentioned, vladimir putin did not talk about an equal dialogue, the possibility of such a thing with the west and actually speaking, this is already a certain change in rhetoric, and without real victories and achievements on the battlefield in ukraine, vladimir putin actually demonstrates such an alleged readiness for negotiations. but again, about western leaders, not about ukraine, and in this and the whole paradox of this situation, which was pointed out by the secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine, oleksiy danilov, he reacted to putin's statements as follows: vladimir putin's speech was called peace after the hegemony of security and justice for all, and everywhere on the nile, this is still a mistake peace after angina, safety and justice

for everyone in the world zhanna and eh and one more question here putin is again repeating these statements about the dirty bomb allegedly being prepared by ukraine he said that ukraine seeks to make some kind of nuclear incident in order to blame in this russia, that is, a statement that ukraine and western countries have already denied, but still, how does the ukrainian government react to putin's repeated statements about the dirty bomb, or are there any new answers , wife? i think that new answers are not even worth it. especially to expect, since the main theses , the main reactions are already known, and, in fact, the position of ukraine, which is, first of all, the most dangerous, is that we often see it from the previous stages of the war, if russia accuses ukraine of something, you can expect what is called transverse falseplay i.e. the fact that russia itself will dare to take such steps and blame ukraine for this. this is one of the biggest dangers, and the second is actually the fact that

official kyiv is clearly aware that the talk about the bomb may indicate russia's readiness for further escalation of the entire war about the expansion of hostilities, and this in turn is consistent with other statements of vladimir putin in today's e that the country in his picture of the world is not an exercise, there is no sovereignty, that is, the russian pocket or continues to completely deny ukraine the right to its own thank you to the state zhanna correspondent zhanna bezpyachuk was in direct contact with us from kyiv and regarding the russian claims about the dirty bomb allegedly being prepared by ukraine, today putin said that he personally instructed the minister of defense shoigu to call the western ministers and share with him this information of the russian of the special services, once again, the statement about the dirty bomb is considered a lie by ukraine and western countries, which in russia have the opportunity to

produce such a bomb, our colleagues from the bbc asked the experts on nuclear policy and maryana bonzherin, a researcher from harvard university. explain to our audience what a dirty bomb is. it is also called a radiological dispersal device. amount of these materials, this device can be hidden in the trunk of a car, it can be even smaller, but radioactive materials cause less damage than it could seem to someone it will not expose people to radiological diseases it is rather a weapon of mass disorder than mass destruction so it is not a nuclear bomb in any case the damage that this bomb

causes does not come from a nuclear reaction as such it will not be something more what are used by terrorist groups, what else can they produce independently and use in urban densely populated locations, and again, the most damage will be caused by what panic the explosion will create, by how many people will have to be evacuated while it is necessary to clean up to decontaminate a certain area rather than from the explosion itself. you claim that such bombs were used by terrorist groups rather than countries, or were such bombs used before? they were not used before, and that is why it is interesting that the russian government raises this topic. to be honest, the use of this bomb makes no sense to any of the ukrainian parties. the institutions that have these radiological materials are under the control of the megate, and

so all the materials they have on record and international organizations know everything about them, so they cannot disappear without a trace on the other side of russia as a nuclear power there is no obligation to report the presence of such materials megathe and of course they have an unlimited amount of such radioactive radiological materials so they can definitely create something that resembled a dirty bomb very quickly is this their plan it is very difficult to determine why they raise this topic like this can serve them, and russia scares with a dirty bomb, while it conducts training of the strategic forces of nuclear forces for the second time in a year, why demonstrate its capabilities to frighten the former rear admiral of the navy of the united states forces mark montgomery told what he thinks the maneuvers mean to the russians, these are planned exercises that are held every year and in fact just now the united states and nato are conducting exercises on nuclear deterrence stetfas nun and these

are very large-scale exercises typical for russians with typical missile launches, so what is even unusual for them, it is the fact that they launch ballistic missiles from submarines and intercontinental ballistic missiles and cruise missiles from strategic bombers within the same exercise, but i assume that this is a kind of demonstration of power on the part of president putin. however, in general, there is nothing extraordinary about these exercises, they are simply arranged in extraordinary times, the reason why the united states and nato are concerned about this is that, as we know, the russians in their military doctrine have not abandoned the tactical of nuclear weapons, unlike the west, and the russian arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons is significant five or even 10 times more than the arsenals of the united states and nato, the consequences of the use of such weapons were enormous even if it was a low-power weapon, it would

create an area unfit for life for many decades, depending on the direction of the wind and the place of precipitation, it would pollute large areas in ukraine and russia, and both of these countries are primarily grain - it is bread for the countries of africa and the middle east in the east, this would have really long-term devastating consequences for the region and for the world, and here is the statement of the american minister of defense lloyd austin . the pentagon also wants to strengthen its defense and modernize its army, the minister of defense of the country mariusz blaszczak, speaking in the parliament in the next year's budget, first wants to increase the financing of the army to 3% of gdp, i.e. more than two percent of nato's requirement, and poland is buying new weapons and also wants to strengthen own

defense industry and what kind of support poland provides to ukraine, both militarily and politically, we talk with journalist oleg bilecki, a journalist of the polish tv channel tefound24 on to a direct connection from warsaw so oleg, i congratulate you on the air and poland is arming itself, it wants to strengthen its arsenal, how does polish society feel about it ? congratulations zhenya, well, it is worth saying from the latest news, at least from the latest statements from the polish political community, a meeting of the committee of the specialized sinac committee on armaments was held about the possibility to localize, for example, the production of e-e javelin anti-tank missile launchers in order to e-e first speed up their appearance in service in poland well, of course, to simplify the process of this production, the solution is not yet complete , but at least here is this discussion and here is this

appeal that should appear in the near future already to the american side, we can certainly say that this is about the latest initiative well, if you answer the question about the support of polish society about the mood which also dominate in the polish political community, it is absolutely unanimous here that representatives of the opposition and representatives of the government speak out in favor of the fact that this is a necessity, but because of the data that poland is now facing, it demands there are discussions about this weaponry, but these are rather discussions of a technical nature. how exactly should the country arm itself, what funds should be allocated for this weaponry? well, as another short example to make it clear to the audience, you can mention, for example, the story of the wall on the belarusian border. there is a lot about this. discussed among the politicians among the opposition and the government well, but the answer to the question whether it is necessary to strengthen

the eastern borders of poland , but it was unanimous was absolutely unanimous and the position of society and also the position of various representatives of different branches of government in poland. if we talk about the support that poland provides to ukraine, here is the military support that is most important. what is the amount if you can generalize like this? if we talk about the military support for ukraine, then the specific figure can be named almost exactly, it is more than 1.7 billion us dollars, it is such a relatively uh approximate amount, the figure uh, for which poland provided weapons for ukraine, when it comes to certain types of weapons, then there are also polish crabs, which are very uh showed themselves positively at the front, we know from the beginning of the summer when they appeared at the front and also other types of small arms, i will not list them all, but in general i think this is the number that i mentioned at the beginning of the answer, it just

indicates what are the nature of this polish military aid to the ukrainian army and support flights. yesterday, the senate of poland, the upper house of the parliament, recognized the russian government as a terrorist regime and once again condemned russian aggression. what do these decisions mean ? it will have practical consequences - it will strengthen sanctions. will it have any other consequences? those who made this decision are now appealing, and it was made unanimously. that is, all 85 senators who were present were present during this vote. all of them said yes, that is, the decision is absolutely complete and unanimous er, in the body of this decision, in the explanation of this decision, for example , an appeal to the international political community and the creation of an international legal tribunal were envisaged in order to convict those who led to the aggression. who actually led to these human sufferings and civilian sufferings on

the territory of ukraine? and the second thing is that this is a matter of perspective - it depends on how the political discussion will develop, probably if other branches of government will support this decision and recognize the russian government as terrorist, it will probably lead to the landing of the russian ambassador p. andreev, for example . as for the expediency of his stay in poland, discussions have been going on for quite a long time. a specific decision regarding the russian embassy in warsaw, there was a big conference in berlin, a conference on the reconstruction of ukraine, where they talked about the details of the marshal's plan for ukraine, and by the way, the polish prime minister morawiecki was quite categorical. here i will quote only a few of his quotes for europe, this is the moment europe must show its strength to defend its principles and values, and according to him,

russia's policy of appeasement has bankrupted itself, everyone who tries to do this will drag europe down poland in the eu remains on the positions that it is impossible to negotiate with russia, only to fight, this position has not changed since the beginning of the war, poland takes an absolutely consistent position, and this is the position that you just voiced, that is, it is impossible to negotiate politically with the russians and the russian federation more than that. if we talk about what has already happened after this conference, prime minister muravetskyi, for example , spoke with german journalists and also spoke a lot about how europe behaves, what decisions are made by different countries, for example he quite positively assessed the position of frank walter steinmeier, president of the federal republic of germany, who finally admitted while in kyiv that in fact the west should have listened more to the warnings and forecasts presented in warsaw even before

the start of the full-scale invasion and in general regarding of the russian federation, mate zhmuravetsky emphasizes this as a positive factor, and accordingly , we can talk about what is positive, uh, those actions that are now being taken by western countries, those decisions . they are also evaluated in warsaw. and finally, one question is: how is poland preparing for the winter of a difficult winter, which will be a difficult winter in europe? well, it means more serious if we talk about such a human social segment literally an hour ago on the streets of warsaw, i saw for the first time billboards that had no advertising before, depicting, for example, vladimir putin his face in the background so far away are the inscriptions about the cost of fuel, the cost of electricity, the cost of other goods - this is also his weapon where putin's name is written, but his image is clearly visible, obviously political circles are trying to prepare society for the fact that

it will be a difficult winter. well, you will have to live through it , and the main thing is to do it with dignity for yourself, that's why there are such appeals just on the streets of the polish capital. thank you oleg bilecki, journalist of the polish tv channel tefan 24 by us in direct communication from warsaw, the russian invasion of ukraine will have long-term negative consequences on the world energy markets , these are the conclusions of the international energy agency in its annual report, the agency reiterates that although invasion has caused a truly global energy crisis, this may be an opportunity to think about clean energy sources, the organization says that increasing government spending on renewable energy sources as a response to this crisis could be a turning point in the rejection of fossil fuels and finally another news russia threatens to knock down commercial western satellites that are

used to help ukraine in the war, an official of the russian ministry of foreign affairs stated this during a meeting of the un general assembly committee and already the reaction to such statements of the united states the representative of the white house said that there will be a response to any attack on the american infrastructure, and according to him, russia is really trying to get anti- satellite technology, and by the way, if we talk about satellites and the un, unesco monitors the destruction of ukrainian monuments under during russia's war against ukraine and launches a platform where you can see satellite images of the destruction before and after unesco has already confirmed the damage to 27 places , including religious places, churches and houses of historical and 18 monuments of artistic value, 15 museums, 10 libraries, the most destruction in the east and around kyiv, representatives of unesco say that every day they analyze the situation in ukraine, the level of damage in winter

. once watch us tomorrow at 9:00 pm and read more news on our website bbc.ua vietnamese balm zirka is the first step in the treatment of colds , a proven medicine, not a cosmetic mixture let's be healthy, ask vietnamese pharmacies, trust only proven medicines , so that ukrainians don't think about it, so that they don't speak first anyway