were depicted as hamsters, speaking of cold and even cruel on the part of philip, who always wanted to see his son as brave and flawless as he was, in fact, charles was completely different, he was much softer, and therefore his father's behavior was incredible traumatized and well, of course, the relationship of edward, one of the sons of elizabeth and philip, with the nazis is one of the most shameful episodes in the history of the royal family. she tried always tried to hide his participation. there were fewer mentions, and here the authors of the crown raised it so loudly again, it all began to be discussed again, who will be satisfied here, ah, peter morgan, the creator of this series, one of the most famous such stories of makers in the united kingdom , he is the son of refugees, by the way, his dad was german

to the jews, mom is polish, they moved during the second world war , migrated, fled to england, peter morgan is famous for his political stories. scandalous of some kind, but i always note tact on his part and a deep enough study of the topic, especially he likes tony blair to describe his various relationships between different people, one of his most famous films is the film frost vs. nixon, there he tells the story of a landmark - a series of famous interviews yu david frost in richard nixon, where nixon admits to his involvement in the gay scandal and then has to resign. the trick of this film is that david frost was just a showman, he was nothing a political financial analyst or a journalist and everyone laughed and said that nixon wants to use you as

just some fool who can only host some entertainment shows and who did not expect from him that he would lead the entire president into the clear and become famous for it well, what does peter morgan say a- and he responds to these various accusations regarding the fact that you portrayed the royal family not as it is, you lied, you chase a sensation, you want to hype and in general, you should be ashamed of this, all from the first season, these accusations were heard and from the first season, peter morgan and his team and his colleagues answer in the same way, they answer that we are not presenting a documentary film and not a biographical film a-a we have actors, they play according to the script, and therefore it is hardly possible to expect that this series will show the absolute truth and from start to finish i think that when you create a drama

based on real people real events you need to ask yourself what is your attitude to truth and accuracy and responsibility for that is why i think that all our biggest working debates come down to how confident i can say something when my colleague dalward offers a different view we deal with the facts whose facts are these who are the historians what point of view do they hold where do i take my facts in the case of the royal family and prime ministers there is good news for writers our characters are public their daily movements are so visible that everyone knows where they have been almost every single day there is no mystery at all so you can create your character but i have to draw certain dots to connect well-known events into a coherent history and this is where

i have to use java in response to this, a huge number of different observers , journalists, and just there, the public and various commentators who continue to accuse peter of the organ that he is fooling the public and the public thinks that she is watching a true historical movie, in fact, it is not so, but they say so directly that the audience is such a little fools who, even looking at the actors, are good at taking everything at face value and not understanding that if you see the actors, maybe you should think about whether i am showing you the truth or not showing you the truth , but we know from experience that this is how game movies and game movies are often perceived, after watching a feature-game movie about some historical characters, they begin to believe that this is exactly how it is and it was actually that the screenwriters made

up some kind of story because then it was all filmed off -site and with the truth it may not even be rubberized and it is absolutely normal for a movie if it is artistic if it is a game if we let's remember the various high-profile stories that happened with the crown, just so you understand how important this series is for the british, for the english, we can remember even in 2020, after the release of the fourth episode, the minister of culture oliver duoden began to speak for all media purposes and to talk about asking peter morgan authors to put the so-called display by the way, this request is still being heard more and more actively to the authors, what does the mertz display mean, a written warning to the audience before each episode what was uttered by the gentlemen now look at the false story and invented or partially invented, but the authors until now do not put these dissleimners, no matter

who demanded a bridge of chickens, whether you are the minister of culture or not, they still continue to rely on the fact that it is already clear in their at the time, the press secretary of the royal family, the former arbiter of the action, he said that the authors of the crown were abusing their right not to interpret, and many moments were shown falsely, and it is not clear why they showed it falsely. well for example, they depicted prince charles, who was played by john in conor, as a person who always walks with a hunchback, in fact, they say that the prince always had a good posture, that any monarch taught him from childhood not to be slouched, why did they say that he was shown like this, obviously, in order to emphasize that he is absolutely and loser daha and his very physique shows it, in fact it is not so. i will say that the whole question, again, he is not simply in the interpretations, but in the perception of each viewer, because

the same press-secret arbiter of the royal family he accused the authors of the crown that they showed such people as prince chaltsi and his beloved camila in a very bad way, that they showed these two criminals who mocked the unfortunate process and diana about the trial. diana was shown as an exceptional victim . after all, it was shown that prince chai was in love with camila before marrying diana, but once again the evil queen elizabeth did not allow him to marry his beloved woman, instead he had to marry diana, whom he treated very well at the beginning, but since they were very different people, their marriage was clearly doomed from the very beginning, and then we simply saw historically that camila and charles did get married later, and well, on

the contrary, it will show their couple as a strong enough that underwent serious tests, and therefore i don’t understand why their authors are accused of showing them to be evil hm absolutely on the contrary, these are just people who got into certain uh circumstances who at a certain moment were stronger than them another moment with margaret thatcher, because in the fourth season, hmm, she was one of the main characters , in general, throughout all the seasons, the relationship of elizabeth the second and with various prime ministers was shown quite clearly, and margaret thatcher, as you understand, is not the most favorite prime minister in ob to the united kingdom and, at the same time, the opinions of the british were divided because some said that gillian anderson, who played the role of margaret thatcher, portrayed her as an even bigger bitch than she actually was, while others began to say

that not enough is too good, margaret thatcher came out and well, this again shows this individuality of acceptance, some accept yes, some accept yes and hm. it is probably not always worth listening to the opinion of the audience, well, at least not to perceive it too unambiguously, but always compare all the impressions of the audience and then only it is possible to conclude that uh, hmm, in relation to the fifth season, it is definitely the most scandalous, first of all, because it comes out too early, because it is only well, recently queen elizabeth left for a better world, and we already we are teaching it now. literally in two months, the series is very scandalous about her in particular. well, once again , the issues with those displayers will not be detached from the authors. and there are several points that are discussed. first, prime minister

john major speaks - and is categorically against this series. he says that there is an outright lie, that there will be a scene when the prince comes to him to the manager and persuades him to make the queen give up her throne instead , charles would take her place. what this has never happened in his life, charles has never come with such a request, and he does not understand why the authors lie at such a level, well, the authors say that they obviously know something, but a friend of princess diana, who was a consultant, refused this and said that hmm, the screenwriters all the permitted limits of correctness have already been reached, and that is why she does not want to participate in this and that's all. she asked not to mention herself even in the credits, and one more moment - these are hints of the possible romance of prince charles with countess penny nage, there were these rumors

have been dating for a long time a-a prince tea with prince philippu i apologize more than once myself a-a well, in the presence of him, in an ironic manner, he spoke to journalists about the fact that there was no romance, that they were just friends and even if he wanted to go to the left, he would always follow him there are so many bodyguards that they simply wouldn't let him do it. one more fact shows that there was no love affair on the side, the fact that he was even invited to a funeral in principle. they didn't treat her i would have invited her to this event. moreover, at that time there were quarantine restrictions and very few people received invitations, but penny in particular, and this indicates that she had a fairly friendly and warm relationship with the queen herself, and why the authors, hmm, hint at this novel is also not clear but i want to say that we haven't seen her in this series, it

will be released on november 9th, well, that's why we ca n't say anything yet, it's all kinds of rumors so far, why netflix won't give up on releasing the series just now well, because netflix needs money is already being observed as they say popularity well, it can be seen by the ratings on neflix itself that people all over the world watch the previous seasons of the crown, this very often happens before the release of new seasons, people want to remind themselves of the events of the previous and many seasons, and that is why it is clear about the fact that there will be an extremely large number of viewers of the fifth season of the crown, new subscribers will appear. by the way, during these coronavirus years, the number of subscribers of netflix has significantly decreased, they want to get them now because nobody wants to bear any losses and that 's why we can't hope that

netflix will agree to change their plans, they're already members of financial risks because they postponed the documentary series about meghan markle and prince harry because for their earnings, it would be really cool if a scandalous documentary was followed by a scandalous game series. in general, there is an opinion that it is very dangerous for us to shoot game films about people who are living today because almost no one is satisfied with their in the screen image, this is very often the case. and whenever world directors made biographical films, even about dead people, their relatives and children would still come and demand that the film be reshot or not released because they allegedly lied. one of the brightest

of such cases was the case with the film princess of monaco, where the main role was played by nicole kidman, she is grace kelly, a hollywood actress who married the prince of monaco and began to build a career in a completely different way during filming, even during writing the script, the three children of grace kelli, who was no longer alive, tried in every possible way to boycott this shooting. it was prince alberg, the second is stefania and karolina, and they still did not achieve their goal. the film was released, but they ignored it, did not accept invitations, for example, to the premiere at the cannes film festival because they said that this is not our mother, that our mother was not like that, that such events did not happen, that the director olivier dan is the same as peter morgan said that i do not shoot a historical film, i do not shoot a documentary film, i have the right to

different artistic conjectures, fantasies and false depictions of facts because the film is not a documentary, but it is about a rather successful tape about margaret thatcher, which was called the lady of the climb, and there is the same story, and the iron lady was played by meryl streep, she is probably an actress who cannot complain at all to be but in margaret thatcher, who was still alive at that time, these claims were made, she also stated that i was not like that, you completely devalued all my career achievements for you it was just entertainment and therefore i will ask she told all her colleagues, the conservative party , and everyone who respects me, to atone for this film and not watch it, and very recently, a similar story also happened, and we are acting with gucci ridley scott's film. and it's all about patricia rejanov, she was the main character, she was played by lady gaga this woman

she is known for the fact that she ordered a hit man for her husband and then and then she served time in prison , she was always quite eccentric and after the release of the film she was outraged that lady gaga also portrayed her falsely, she is not like that at all was and what bothered her the most was that lady gaga did not come to consult with her already during the filming, and this offended her. to which lady gaga said that she was not going to do anything about it, especially with a woman like patriajani, i did not want to collude with patricia gucci, i think she wanted to impose on me popular stories about myself as a notorious serial killer, a person who created the history of gucci. i think what she did was wrong, i 'm sure she regrets everything, the only ones i sympathize with. and her daughter is in the history of ukrainian

of mass art of mass culture, there have already been cases when some characters, not necessarily the main ones, were absolutely against being shown and depicted in any way and said that everything was wrong, well, the most striking example of the usual film was banned, which was previously called stus, but the son of the poet dmytro stus told the authors what if i ask you not to use my last name, i had to change the name, but hey, hmm, especially against these films was viktor medvedchuk himself, who appeared there as the lawyer of vasyl stus, he found out that there would be a scene protusus at the court hearing and he didn't want it to be shown to anyone in a negative light, that's why he organized a whole campaign to have this

scene cut out for ugu. it didn't work at all, but there was public pressure and the scene was removed . roman halaimov played it. eh lawyer, how did this character appear in this film because he was not called medvedchuk. he was a lawyer, but everyone understood everything. he is extremely similar to eh medvedchuk himself. let's see. you know that stus's poems have an anti-soviet orientation vasyl with a field perceives the ugliness of the life of ukrainians and speaks directly and sharply against them that viktor medvedchuk is accused in particular, god, how many accusations have been thrown at him, but in particular he is accused of not only not defending vasyl stus at this trial, but on the contrary, he was even more harsh towards him than the judge himself and simply demanded

a punishment for him and there could be no defense, and by the way, vasyl stus himself said from the very beginning that this person would not defend me. he asked for another lawyer. well, that's it the book turned out to be a very similar story. i think you will recognize it. what is the name of the book? it is called the criminal case of stus. it was authored by the cypriot watchdog. in general, but not always, such a resonance occurs around the collection of documents, but here it happened because viktor medvedchuk also helped in the forest. he began to be indignant that an entire chapter was devoted to him, you should delete it, but the author’s seam on this and social unrest opened again, and this book became incredibly popular and began to be sold, supporting vatanga kypians in general, the idea is to tell the truth about viktor medvedchuk again and again

, and nothing happened to him, medvedchuk. i mean, we see what happened to him now, and well, from the recent similar events, we can certainly name the tape about bucha so far, it's called bucha , so the working title already has a trailer, it was discussed quite briskly, the screenwriter and the director said that the shooting is planned sometime in december. and why did the scandal arise, because the cinematographic community and part of the residents were first of all upset buchi because there is generally such a tradition not to shoot feature films, so, so, so close to some tragedy , because it is still perceived painfully enough, and the authors do not have time to reconsider this event deeply enough, this event is still on some emotional level, therefore, and a good work of art is almost never it turns out that the authors began to be accused of simply hyping

this topic, the authors said that they just want to tell the world about buchok once again the discussion of this film is so violent because we see that all over the world this is happening, the only thing is that when there are some attempts to ban something, to ban the shooting of this film there or to ban the book, it is certainly not a very civilized tradition, the tradition is to simply have a discussion , there are enough films and books that were simply not published, but not because they were taken, banned there by the government, government officials or anyone, or in some kind of court order, but simply because there was such a resonance in society that the creators saw that you should definitely not do this because, well, people simply won’t accept it, this is the most civilized way so far. i don’t know of boycotts or

discussion of any very irritating topics in art . and this is happening on the example of the crown. to shoot , they simply call for some actions by the authors, they call for some uh, well, still, well, improvements to the plot or changes in the plot, but they do not insist on exactly as prohibitions, so we probably should not insist, but be more active in our discussions at least in social networks. if we don't like something. if something seems wrong to us, if we are talking about art, then of course we need to express ourselves, but of course before that we have to listen to some film critics or art critics, i.e. people who specialize in something, and then draw our own conclusions. that's it . we are all waiting for the release of the crown series, because

it will be released, let me remind you, on november 9. what do i think, and during the release of all the series and after the discussion, they will be even hotter. and we are also waiting for the sixth season a where the authors will already depict the death of princess diana and i'm just afraid to imagine what will happen in the world then, specifically in the united kingdom well, that's all i have, i wish you a peaceful evening and a peaceful night , join the community with a ukrainian perspective become a sponsor of the espresso youtube channel. this is access to exclusive content, personal thanks , pinned comments, special icons there, the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click sponsor and become a part communities with a ukrainian perspective iryna koval mother

wife host of the espresso tv channel and i am also a volunteer our soldiers at the front need a lot of things every day and that is why it is part of my life today - this is help to the armed forces of ukraine and i am very grateful to my colleagues for supporting me in this, now i am walking strangers to lviv. instead of kyiv, i go to an unfamiliar coffee shop and drink delicious lviv coffee. everything is alive and everyone alive in ukraine owes the army to the army. now , miraculously, life and army are synonymous words in ukraine, because without the army there is no life. help the army. it is to help life, you are helping the ukrainian army and life will win over death, everyone from you can

even a small contribution to support the army saves the lives of our soldiers and brings our victory closer in the cockpits of airplanes on radar stations at the control points of anti-aircraft missile systems at thousands of combat positions throughout the territory of our country they bring victory closer every day. glory to the air force of the armed forces of ukraine. greetings. good evening. my name is myroslava barchuk, these are my own names, a project of ukrainian foam and the espresso tv channel. today my guest is daria girna, director of the liberation movement research center, tv presenter, daria, journalist. greetings, good evening. greetings, ms. myroslava.

it is very nice to be with you today, each other . e i know that and everyone knows that you are researching the liberation movement and you e hmm made a whole big a-a cycle of conversation with dissidents of the face of independence and today we will talk about dissidents e about why e texts of ukrainian dissidents of the soviet era unread and their voices are not heard, this is a bit of a categorical judgment, but i will insist that it is so from my point of view, it is so and from my conversations and communication with many dissidents, it is so, and it seems to me that these people who are in fact, in the 1960s,

we generally speak of the sixties, so people who stood up for the defense of freedom of speech a-a national e-e national culture of the ukrainian language e-e ukrainian church, for this they succumbed to the repressions of the soviet system, went to prisons and camps , returned at the end of the year and did not were noticed ukrainian society is ukrainian in general. it seems to me that if it is not a drama, if not a tragedy , then it is a great drama of ukrainian society, and it seems to me that this is a big problem, a big open question, and i remember how yevhen sverstyuk told me sometime in the early 2000s about the fact that when he first got to the west, he returned from exile and somewhere in the late 80s he

got into protection, it seems, in north america and he was amazed with what uh respect, what respect he was treated with his experience before the experience his act, people in the west and he told me the following phrase that for him it was amazing, that is, that this is an experience that he did not have here in ukraine . i will tell you about my experience. but you are a different generation. why were the stories , texts, and generally the actions of the dissidents so important to you? why did you start researching the actual dissident movement? you know. i am very interested

. master's degree in the school of journalism, i learned for the first time about myroslav marinovych and the fact that in ukrainian history there was a ukrainian helsinki group, a whole dissident movement, and i understood that we were taught this history at school very briefly, very briefly, and i at that moment , she was probably aware of the role of that stus. but now i understand why, why did it happen like that, no matter how cynical it sounds, the history of the dissident movement is still a peaceful resistance. yes, and it was not very massive. as when i spoke with yosif zisils, and he said that out of 50 million ukrainians, only 5,000 to 5,000

were dissidents, that is, it was difficult to notice such a number of people who were oppositionists in the ussr, because they were dealt with very effectively, the system is cruel and for some reason, public memory is better. we remember, well , some black pages, yes, the holodomor, in which several million died . yazneni yes, that is, a-a such an impression as if by what covers that this history is the better we remember it unfortunately, but the history of the dissident movement is interesting to me because it is uh, this method of struggle is very suitable nowadays