shared when when he saved them when he tied up the bullets some gave us what he pulled out of them because he pulled out gave them and this kevo where they tell and what about the last day they are silent only some even cry but i always want convey to everyone that this is a simple ukrainian and a simple soldier, a soldier, because he very often discourages all our eyes , mentally, you know. where are you, this is a soldier and a general, yes, a soldier, no, a soldier, a hero of ukraine is

deserved . beloved the european country of our european union had a person of such a category of such a weight, such a hero . surely everyone would know from the moment he went to school that there is such a hero of ours, not to mention what to call the streets of schools and parks, everything that is connected to medical institutes is whole because because well, we underestimate those people, but they made an american film out of conscience, a very similar situation, and the whole world watches and cries at that film. i think there, the story of us is much more powerful, and who has it , our future should be shaped by the ukrainian nation of such people

examples, of course, the big thing is why our children died there is that they died there, although many say yes, they stood well, they would have stood there if they had detained the troops there . to drink in a day maybe he doesn't know so much we don't know i know that they could have been taken there from those ruins and they would have been more useful to us alive now they weren't lying there they are lying somewhere now everyone is a piece of land i said igor was a good doctor this many people say that he would be a good teacher, would

you be a good engineer or someone else ? he had practice, take into account that he did very difficult things continuously for a month and a half, and the most important thing was in difficult conditions , that is, his practice was such that he could possibly teach any medical institute himself, of course i want there to be peace in the country, i want everything there was an agreement, but i want the border to be put in place so that it becomes ours, because it is ours, i want this, i am not a great patriot. well, i also look at ukraine and want it to be so that our sons did not

die there for nothing, because if we do not return everything back , why then the boys went there and are going back, our country should become the way it was, and the borders where they were, there is nothing to touch us. nothing sounds good to us, we ourselves know how to do well and know what to do,

join the community with a ukrainian view of the world, become a sponsor of the youtube channel espresso and that access to exclusive content, personal thanks , fixed comments, special icons there, the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click to sponsor and become part of the community with a ukrainian perspective, i am iryna koval

, mother, wife, host of the espresso tv channel. and i am also a volunteer. our soldiers at the front need a lot of things every day, and that is why of my life today - this is help to the armed forces of ukraine and i am very grateful to my colleagues that they support me in this, now i walk in unfamiliar lviv and not in kyiv i walk into an unfamiliar coffee shop and drink delicious lviv coffee. everything is alive and everyone alive in ukraine owes the army to the miracle of life. life and army are synonymous words in ukraine, because without the army there is no life . helping the army is helping life. you help the ukrainian army and life will defeat death. each of you can help even a small contribution to the

support of the army saves the lives of our soldiers and brings our victory closer in the cockpits of the planes behind the monitors of the radar stations at the control points of the anti-aircraft missile systems by a thousand combat positions throughout the territory of our country, they are bringing victory closer every day. glory to the air force of the armed forces of ukraine on the air, the saturday political club program is with you, anzhelika

sezonka . good evening. why are the russians lying about their progressive successes in the bakhmut area? well, let's also mention the topic of the scandal with the motor sich enterprise, because mr. boguslaev, the suspect, can now be exchanged or he will name the names of his accomplices, but let's start with the main ones, here are such events at the front, here's what anzhelika prosovist talked about sevastopol , let's talk about how russia can respond, because our guests in this part of the broadcasts spoke, necessarily politically columnist group information resistance oleksandr kovalenko greetings mr. oleksandr, greetings good evening and serhii grabsky military expert, participant of the visual places and reserve colonel, congratulations good evening well, let's start with the explosions in crimea. here we can say that this is unprecedented information, uh, underwater and ground drones, info-reconnaissance information, how serious is this, in principle, for

the black sea fleet, oleksandr well, uh, first of all, let's say that today there is no uh, official confirmation that the armed forces of ukraine may have some relation to exactly that incident that we could observe this morning in the district or someone in sevastopol, and on the other hand, if we consider the general and what happened, well, it was really something unprecedented, then it was better that such a large-scale use mass use let's say so, uavs, but these were exactly without crew, without crew boats, according to the video that we can even now watch in open sources, which is present in open sources, we used this type of boats and yes, they have the ability to do everything after all, to inflict quite serious damage, and even to a

patrol coruprio, such as the a-type frigate that we talked about, as well as other objects in russian, i understand, can be fully called the black sea fleet, and that is already the case a budget option of inflicting quite serious rather serious losses on a potential enemy and besides, it was planned 100%, 100% was very high-quality and therefore well, if you observe from the side, it really is and it was very interesting such an operation and could it be after all a provocation by the russian federation, because immediately after that, russia announced that it was withdrawing from the grain agreement, mr. serhiy. no, no, it was not a provocation by the russian federation, because due to the force of the explosions that we are seeing, and i hope not too much , we will already see aerial photographs or photographs from

it would be very expensive to organize such a provocation in space, and russia cannot find a way to go because , according to some data, ammunition storage sites and cruise missile storage sites were also damaged there, so such a provocation is practically excluded. i fully support mr. oleksandr, this is a clearly planned operation of the armed forces of ukraine, please tell me, mr. oleksandr, in principle , to what extent it is now possible to say that the russian armed forces practically have to be in a state of defense or offensive, which we see in the bakhmut area still continues, even at such a very slow pace, and the front, if we analyze the front line in particular, and in fact they can only accept defense, and they, if we talk about the direction of avdiyivka, the direction of bakhmut, especially bakhmut , they really try to carry out

assault actions there, er, sometimes are simulating offensive actions from the south or from the north to bakhmut, well, that is, for them, it is a fixed idea to occupy this er, this city er, in fact , they have already been trying to do this for more than 4 months , and that is, 4 months of offensive actions without real of the result and in the direction well, let's say that there is not enough of a large city and not enough of such a large-scale settlement, and therefore, in my opinion , they will continue to storm bakhmut, they continue to strengthen the capabilities that they have, and these are the capabilities of the first army corps of trees of the second army corps, as well as units of the wagner private military campaign, and artillery support. they have quite serious artillery support, but in general, everything will be limited to that, and i don’t know about other directions

i exclude the fact that they will try to carry out counter-offensive actions. the composition of these units, they primarily had to replenish a-a at the expense of the so-called partially mobilized, that is, this is not exactly the resource they need, moreover, even when they have some quantitative the ability to use some kind of resource quantitatively. we saw this on the example of kharkiv oblast, they use it offensively effectively , and only when they have the opportunity, for example, to support this offensive with the tactics of a barrage of fire, large-scale use of artillery and or a kit for it. now they are limited to these

they don't have enough capabilities, they don't have enough artillery, they don't have the necessary amount of ammunition, it's not about the fact that they don't have artillery at all today. and they have comfort, but they don't i would like to ask about whether it is strange or not how putin is behaving now in the sense that the analysts of the institute of war research say that he is not in the mood for negotiations and will continue to fight, nevertheless. we have seen since 2014 that they went to some truce negotiations from time to time in order to strengthen their army, strengthen their defensive positions and escalate it even more. and now why is the scenario different, mr. sergiu ? they can't afford such a uh such a truce because uh, hysteria is building up in russia that

we're going to strike right now, right now we're going to win and right now we're going to go forward, that's why uh, they drove themselves into such a it's a trap when, on the one hand, there is a clear awareness that they cannot achieve their goals in the form of offensive operations, and on the other hand, they cannot afford to announce a truce now, because the people of donbas are suffering as they declare and but it is necessary to keep the situation under in other directions and therefore admit that they are unable to do this and try to stop the war, they simply do not have the right to allow themselves. thus, despite such messages that are now being sounded, it is unlikely that they themselves will go to a truce, especially when they have already declared and this logic of the e-e element about what they demobilized from the mobilization ended logically after this demobilization, there should be an attack on the ukrainian armed

forces in order not to somehow confirm and legitimize this demobilization and show how much effective is the current government. how far will they be able to succeed? well, i have very serious doubts about the fact that such an army or the militia army, what raccoons are called , it is extremely costly and ineffective in its actions. the current situation is simply playing with these conversations about negotiations, and continues to mean the surrender of ukraine by negotiations, hoping that sooner or later it will be possible to force kyiv to do so by the destruction of civilian objects capitulation well, we see that they are now using exactly such tactics among themselves, even if we were talking about bakhmut and mentioned bakhmut. and in recent weeks, it has been observed that they are concentrating artillery strikes not on the positions of the

armed forces of ukraine, that is, they are also striking at positions but the main concentration is already directly on the civilian objects and on the civilian infrastructure of bakhmut, that is, they once again demonstrate every time that the elements of terror against the civilian population are for them is a priority or their tactics, tactics and strategies for conducting hostilities, and as for putin, we understand that it is impossible to conduct any peace negotiations with him, and for putin, there is only one goal - the capture of ukraine, and he can if it to start some kind of negotiations solely in order to gain time er to compensate for losses during this time to restore the technical potential of the units and to restore their a-a combat conditions, the ability and after that to resume combat operations again and again by force and then one or another er directions ago

any of these conversations are purely a farce, but we see that it is precisely combined with blackmail, that is, nuclear blackmail, then other blackmail , strikes on a civilian object, these are also all the elements of blackmail that are intended to force to ukraine on the pretext of capitulating or entering into some kind of agreement with russia precisely on the terms of russia. well, we understand that this will not happen , first of all, and secondly, we must also understand that -m er-e aspiration precisely because of terror er-e today already because of some tactical or strategic successes will achieve their goals and they will continue, so we must be morally and psychologically ready for this, mr. sergey, and in principle, you can explain the meaning

of the talks about the dirty bomb, which continues, everyone already understands that this is a delusion and that russia is not just using propaganda it is for this topic that the minister of defense of russia calls all the ministers of defense whom he knows or does not know, well, mr. vitaly , you have said the same repeatedly and you can actually answer this question, er, about that big the support that they have, let's call them so unstable minds in europe, and it is precisely on such unstable conditions or on the supporters of the russian peace, whether conscious or unconscious, that such a provocation is actually calculated and in this way, monitoring the western press, i myself was surprised at that level activity, which is now manifested in the discussion of issues of absolute magic, namely, the issue of the so-called dirty bomb, and this topic is picked up again by some conscious or unconscious supporters of the russian peace in western europe and

is trying and this topic is spreading and psychosis, i'll tell you. yes, it's quite big because now one of the main issues has arisen is the question of purchasing potassium iodide and how to save it, so you know based on the concept of hybrid war or the concept of informational and psychological operations is a kind of operation that may not give an immediate effect, but it, you know, lays such seeds of doubt whether it is worth helping ukraine or whether it is not worth stopping and stopping support for ukraine and so on and the like, that is, a- and in this in this case, we can say that the adversaries are using such a large-scale strategy of gradually changing public opinion in europe, as far as they can manage it. to what extent do they have enough resources to generate such primitive provocations, because it is very difficult to say exactly what primitive provocations are working nowadays, because they are also under by internal pressure, by external

pressure, we understand the growing problems in the economy and internal political contradictions in russia, and no matter how difficult it is to distinguish them now, they are already beginning to unfold and external is the pressure of the ukrainian armed forces. this is foreign policy isolation and the pressure of sanctions on the economy and on the political system of the russian federation, but such primitive provocations still work and precisely on such conditions, and you can say that there are tens of millions of them in europe and not only in europe and such an operation was sent thank you thank you oleksandr kovalenko serhii grabskyi military experts we have on the air we are moving on to a conversation with the diplomat and minister of foreign affairs of ukraine in 2007-9 volodymyr mariskyi vitau p volodymyr i congratulate you mr. victoria i congratulate you ms. angelica good health so let's try to talk about putin's speech in moldova, you are ungrateful, of course they have been trying to

talk about putin's speeches for 22 years but putin has been saying the same thing for 22 years and in essence it all started with an interview when he told larry king about the boat that it sank, people who have not seen the cents have an illusion that this was the culmination of the interview. and this was the beginning of the interview. the first question that larry king asked putin was what happened to the submarine. in kursk, he then said, well, he drowned, and then yes , she froze, and then, somewhat stunned, began to talk to him, but no one listened for the next hour, because everyone was in such a frenzy, and this, by the way, is exactly what i think now, everyone is just looking with wide-open eyes at all this and they think that what is happening to the person in general is she serious after the phrase "i sat on my dad" yes, is she serious or is she fooling around with him, this is an important question , is he serious or true ?

forced me to listen to his speech eh more i can honestly say yes yes it's true what's true next i already i couldn't help myself eh this chatter well i would say so historical-philosophical phantasms eh because it simply goes beyond the bounds of common sense. actually, it seems to me that it is possible to single out from this speech what you also said about the video. it is absolutely certain that he does not change, that is, he lives in his completely illusory world and he is fine in this world. and here he thinks that er, that's er, such a world er, he will rule forever and what er everything around will actually be subordinated to this phantasm of his, on the one hand, it can be quite good, because as a person, we can

at least somehow look at what we can count on, skymo in the near future, the next months, but at the same time, everything is on the other hand it's dangerous because if it was really a 70-year-old grandfather sitting on a bench and telling his nonsense fantasies to his neighbors on the bench - that's one thing, but today a nuclear bomb reached nothing came of it of the other world. he suddenly wants to go to the real world, and in the real world he has a red button. and right here, this seems to me to be a big problem and a threat to everyone, because on the one hand , his fantasies are his problems, and on the other hand, the red button - this is our problem here, a big , big, so to speak, snag for all those who sit around, but on the other hand, as they say from the

third party, it seems to me to be a very serious reason for everyone else to finally make a decision and you know in this regard i just give a standing ovation therefore, as uh, stepping over very uh, big political , so to speak, uh, his internal obstacles, uh, the choice was made by steinmeier . yes, we will not use pro-russian politics, where are the verbs, i.e., the preposition recklessly, no, well, you know, now he made a powerful political move, it seems to me, he pleaded guilty. he said that i was wrong, and by the way , i didn't start looking for someone else

is it possible to put this same merkel there or someone else? he said yes, i was one of those who conducted a failed catastrophic policy, and here is his change now, this is his truly programmatic speech. after returning from ukraine, she is inspiring, she says that even those people who , whether sincerely or not, were mistaken here, the question is political, and who today in the west still continue to play a certain role, and their serious political role is uncertain; putin can't understand this, he still thinks that he is still pulling someone's strings over there in germany .

the break from reality is really fantastic, well, we have to live with it and understand that either we are him or he is us, there is no other option here. well, i understand that after all, shtan-mair's speech is more important than putin's speech, but still shtanmayer is able to draw conclusions from reality simply by putin is absolutely not. i think that putin actually didn't say anything new. well, that's the truth of new, uh , smart things. vision this is a new approach and i am very glad because steinmeier and shrol are from the same party - they are social democrats, they are people who communicate very intensively, they are people who really define today in their

party, so to speak stein has already a non-party, he is more than a party, but still yes or no otherwise, these are people who can define very serious things in the coming months from us as critically important, so i repeat once again, for me, this is really an example of a european politician who is capable of the very analysis that he is capable of self-criticism, admitting his mistakes . by the way, putin is completely incapable of this. well, as they once said, two worlds, two ways of life in one world, a politician can be wrong, but publicly admitting his mistake, moving on in another world is recognition the head of the state of his mistake means his political and in russia also physical

death, therefore putin will go to the end and this is also a big, big problem. and tell me, mr. volodymyrets, let's deal with this triangle . to make a statement about the readiness to support russia was also for me. by the way, it’s probably strange. because in fact, this turns out to be a strategy that china has been conducting in the east for the past few months, and we all saw that it is not at all it is not on the side of the kremlin and does not want to do it because we understand the risks for ourselves and that is why. well, yes, rhetorically, he asked the question: do we need a war or do we not need

to fight on the negotiating table, that is, the logarithm, the right things, which were somewhat inclined to support russia, but at the same time, there was no de facto support as such, or is this a manifestation of a political change, i think not i think it is most likely an attempt to play with the same americans by giving them you know the idea. well, you see. and we can start working in this way, although according to this statement, which was basically general, we did not see any practical steps, so what do you think , it is more an attempt to feel the position of the united states