earned. well, he doesn't understand. i think that it is precisely the understanding of usunak that he does not have. he probably does not have an understanding of what to do with all this. this question is huge, and i think there are two things that need to be understood. the first is the value system of great britain. what the russians hate, they hate the anglo-saxons. why ? that it is, in principle, an attraction to freedom, the british political culture itself, and not at the beginning of the existence of great britain, i said the last century there, it is based on the great charter of freedoms. when this charter was signed, when it it existed, they didn’t mention it very much, but from time to time the british people rethought it, that it is important that the suzerain and their subjects are equal, he cannot usurp someone’s life and property , punish them for their views, and of course the

russians and the british don’t like it very much when they support us they come from this same idea, this idea of ​​freedom, on the other hand, this idea of ​​freedom, at least for the british, played such a bad joke that they should be free from the european union. moreover, when they chose that choice for against the european union, they were told that leaving the european union would immediately bring a significant dividend economically, not politically, economically, and when then, but the british were told listen, but there are huge problems. tell me, please. and what will you do with the common market, the people who voted for you said that we will sell as we sold and sell to set up europe and we will not allow them there i know what they will do to you as they you to them no well why well how did people not believe in it was the question what uh i considered the number one question at the time when was this brexit and what to do with northern ireland because you know me i recently just re-watched the

northern irish tv series it was the most popular northern irish tv series of all time there uh girls from dandy well because i i like the city itself it's very nice but it is still divided catholic protestant quarters on the border between northern ireland and the republic of ireland and so i saw how the people there simply showed how people lived before this peace agreement i did not find this when i came to northern ireland before belfast i just fell in love so much with the atmosphere, but it was already a peaceful atmosphere and i went to the museum, the librarian understood that there were explosions here, they shot here, they killed here, they dispersed here, they fought here, we write like this, ireland is such a historical arena for such disasters, but i

i don't see how people live beautifully. well, you can see it there in belfast, not noticing any of these consequences of the war in some countries, but it's still obvious that these people are now having political discussions, they are going to elect their regional parliament they are quarreling there, but it all happens right in the parliamentary buffet in front of the television cameras, no one shoots anyone, imagine what we voted for and how we will solve it so that this wound is not opened again, there was no answer now so that there is no there was a war, the british essentially agreed that northern ireland should live in a different customs regime than the rest of the country, this is a strange decision, or you leave together or if you cannot leave, you can leave only in parts , then you do not leave, there are serious problems with the economy

lis tras really tried to solve it surgically yes bah well and now it means this is such a disaster the crisis is only getting worse for me it's a shame i don't think i honestly don't believe that more women can solve this for me it's not for me it reminds me of general secretaries - it's kps honestly saying in the late 1980s and early 1990s, why well , because they are always gorbachev, he always has to rebuild something, it is necessary to carry out glasnost, let's carry out reforms, let's create cooperatives, let's talk about what kind of repressions we had let's do it let's do it everyone was enthusiastic, oh come on , but the problem was socialism itself and gorbachev could not say the problem is that you simply do not have normal property, that you do not own your houses, your apartments, that you because you do not own your bank accounts, that you have no right to property, that you do not

own the business, that the enterprise is not owned by the state, which is not responsible for it. and when this was said not only in russia, in all former in soviet hands, the process of real development began in each country, we can see what this led to in russia. no market helped to build a civilized ukraine, but the main problem was the lack of freedom and the lack of private property in great britain. every prime minister tries to solve something, but he has to to appear as a courageous person who should say you know we made a mistake when we left the european union we will not be able to fix our economic situation here no we can patch a hole here choose there one professional, which will be more professional than the previous one, but the crisis will intensify. and only if we simply have to develop some kind of model so that we can return to a united europe, not because

we like it. in order to receive such privileges and preferences with which we could be on equal footing in the european union, he made such correct conclusions that you are talking about now, while he was in the position of minister of finance before him. by the way, there was no claims and in this position, he is in the crown of the crisis when everyone there was putting additional burdens on business and so on, on the contrary, he distributed money, reduced taxes, he is a good professional, well, such a faithful violin is also good professionals, the head of the central bank is better than twilight, i want to tell you , she is just a professional putin is the problem of the russian economy. she is not on the air about violins and professionalism. and she is a problem in putin, his war with ukraine and in the dictatorship. in all this, you can be a wonderful professional. but when we break objective problems you ca n't handle it if you know how to make umbrellas it doesn't mean you can stop the rain that

's what's the problem and it just might go more smoothly but sunok is the problem why sunok is one of those people who supported brexit, if these people had not supported brexit and brexit would not have happened, we would never have seen any of them in our lives, everything would have been as it was. well, there would have been other people. just all the people who were at the top of the conservative party, who were against braxton and they were the leadership of the party they left politics because all these people are fighting johnson and decided the sunok and all the others that we see now they were considered a frank fringe all these analytical centers that justified the prosperity of great britain after brexit they were considered a bunch of urban madmen, by the way, we also have such people who express some absolutely idiotic ideas there, and if you imagine that they come to some kind of real power, well , the leadership of ukraine will also be counted on this idea, and

now they will redeem this faith by 10 the 10th anniversary of severe economic trials and the final will still be as i say, a person will appear and clearly say it will be an adventurer. you don't even have to think, they bought themselves completely unrealistic slogans for this and that, good careers, but they led the country to a dead end and i know that we really like boli johnson, who supported us, and ilyusha sumy, who supported us. boris johnson's foreign policy behavior will go down in history as a person who fiercely fought against the dictatorship and fiercely opposed putin, but his historian or to characterize him as a political adventurer simply did not come at that time, but he will definitely come. by the way, i do not think that this is a huge tragedy because i'm afraid johnson

is a talented journalist, he's a wonderful author , he's just a bad politician, but it doesn't necessarily have to be connected, there are people who are very talented in their field of activity, but nothing they don't understand, they don't understand politics, they say johnson is exactly that kind of person, with a sense of values ​​and a sense of history. he takes chicher seriously, he just doesn't understand anything in politics , in the economy in general. well, such people cannot even be allowed even to fire a cannon at the ancient street and so now is the time for populism, well, what are you going to do? in many countries, let's not point fingers. yes, mr. vitaly, in closing this topic, after all , ukraine is of interest to us in the context of helping britain, and will they not focus on internal politics or for the british is very important . this is foreign policy, and leaders who can demonstrate themselves on the external arena, on the international stage, so they will continue this

policy of support. a moderate politician in relation to russia to everything other than british politicians the fact is that britain in any form in its economic problems in which factory it remains a global state during the time of margaret thatcher, when margaret thatcher came to power, she was just a sick person in europe, there was just an economic disaster, not a crisis, what is happening here now is a big congratulations, it is still a long way from what happened during the premierships of harold wilson and james calendan and thatcher rectified the situation by tough i would say social pressures that still cannot be given in the early years she was heavily criticized just recently reread to great britain if you say the word cap they will читать will they be red, they hate her, such an ambiguous attitude as what

we, i love her, let's say, but i can, if i were british, it would not be so much like the reforms - this is not one year, it is after all 5-10 years and here what happens is that for great britain, this nuclear power is an important player. on the world stage, it is the leader of the commonwealth of nations, this should not be forgotten , but we look at it as a small island, but one way or another, it has a civilizational influence on a large number of countries, it is the most important an ally of the united states, and in this situation it is absolutely obvious to a briton that if ukraine loses, they will also lose, that's it now, in general, you see it, everyone understands. boli harshly convinced the germans of this and they told him that there is no need to exaggerate now , german politicians themselves, and german politicians from the left camp speak as if this is essentially what they

read about steinmeier's language and told you that it boris johnson's speech it was absolutely promobori sergeant bory johnson said so a long time ago because i repeat once again he has a brilliant mind and it is geopolitics about the player that he understood it before a european or will we hear that such a speech you will see from macron there will be another such speech from macron, well, germany has already melted a little, well, you know, it is important for macron to give us weapons, yes, and france is quite serious and powerful. macron just likes to dilute it with more rounded rivers, but he also needs to understand the same. that if the stooge uttered such a speech, it means that german society has already matured to the state of british society, as soon as french society also matures, macron will immediately say everything he thinks, in fact, you can imagine how he must hate putin. well, in fact, who humiliated him, that is, he behaved like a

serious politician, so he tried he tried to negotiate , he tried to stop the war, he tried to find the right steps and he flew to moscow and this guy sat on his rubber bottom and told all his historical delusions of this, well, well, you just have to sit why are you mocking me? you don't need a history course. i need to agree that we are the norm so that there is no explosion and i can't do anything. i am the president of france. in the right perspective, in contrast to the russian federation. by the way, with regard to germany and israel, there are apparently certain diplomatic successes, because the minister of foreign affairs kuleba also says that the negotiations with israel are moving in a good way, and it is possible that air defense will be provided to us. with germany regarding the tanks, the new

newly appointed ambassador said that it is also possible and there will be a supply. he even expressed such confidence. maybe then france will have noticed soon. change your rhetoric completely in the direction of the ukrainian state, and regarding military aid, i would like to talk about the role china will still play in the relations between the russian federation and in the russian-ukrainian war directly and vitaly what do you think about this support that mr. ogrysko and i wanted to support putin? to frighten the united states of america well, maybe they don't scare the wrong word, but they chose, but to implement some kind of game so big a-a to implement, is there really going to be absolutely such uh support for putin and uh maybe even from weapons they will start providing weapons they will not start providing i think why because one way or

another, the chinese economy is in a better state, if china is not eager for some kind of western sanctions, then these bellboys will not be transferred by whom he absolutely does not need it. therefore, these bellboys will of course support putin politically, he will support those who support putin. as it happens in the morning, he will follow such a neutral position. they do not condemn the russian attack on our country. but weapons are too much for him, and any violation of western sanctions is too much even for i also think that a lot of things will be clear if there is a meeting between biden and the world-zampina from donesia. many issues will be resolved there, and it will also be important to understand how well biden will be able to explain these bells and whistles. the consequences of his union with russia is much closer than i now it is obvious that the people 's republic of china wanted the triumph of russia, it is true that it would for this reason that then they have much

more free hands regarding the taiwans, they can think that the victory of russia is the weakening of america the weakening of america is the way to the war in the taiwan gulf, this war must be victorious. this is a simple formula, but firstly, no one said that russia would win. second, no one said that the americans would weaken. thirdly, no one i didn't say that it will go three to four. china can understand the deep crisis of the economy that will occur as a result of its attack on taiwan , because simply the economy can stop, including the chinese one, that's why we are talking about the production of chips, and china also needs not only the united states, they are needed by everyone for countries with an efficient economy, china despite the economic crisis of recent years. the economy remains efficient and dependent on the latest technologies. so i don't think that everything is as simple as it seems clear that only one question is not

that china wants to support russia, russia really wants to be supported by the whales, here is the speech of vladimir putin at this valdat forum. it was a speech by a person who just wants to be noticed in beijing, who is trying to it is precisely in china that it is considered correct to promote by and large what putin said, and this very chinese thing will no longer be russian, and this also says a lot about the fact that, in principle, putin, as before he, oleksandr lukashenko, had no one to rely on, he said all the time that he wanted to be a great friend of china, but china will help us, let even russia abandon it, this is all a delusion, because in china the structure of the economy is completely different, which is connected with the fact that chinese investments are investments the chinese believe that even if they invest in some project, they bring their materials, their workers, they pay their wages, this is such economic nationalism, it is everywhere, it is in africa , it is in asia, it has been observed in russia, it can be

in ukraine, if i have it, we will go, but it does not change the economic situation of those countries in which china invests money. of course, he can build his own railway in his own years, as he does in africa, but along this railway, your minerals will be to be sold by chinese companies china has long pursued such an economic policy and this is not the policy of the central committee of the communist party china is so simple chinese business is set i say again that we cannot even imagine the level of chinese economic nationalism, i don't think it's good because i think that globalism is still better than this cylinder because it goes to a certain extent a normal country is civilized it should be interested in the development of another country, what is the difference between the positions of countries such as france or great britain britain in relation to africa and asia and in the positions of china and russia, france always tried

to ensure that in the post-colonial era these african countries developed themselves so that they had their own economy that they could feed their citizens in the registers of those citizens fleeing to france is not scolded, and china absolutely does not need it, it just needs its investments to lead to the growth of its economy, and russia just needs to send some of its mercenaries that they will become the bodyguard of the next dictator and exclude the resource from there, and then russia will have an absolutely colonial approach to these countries . accuses the west of colonialism, it is generally surprising to me that there are absolutely obvious things that no one wants to notice, and just as putin said in a speech that globalism is a disaster, well, of course, such things interfere to dictators, how can he rule forever, this is true, by the way, with regard to the meeting of joseph maidan and vladimir putin at the big twenty, they are already saying that if vladimir putin goes there, because biden

confirmed his participation, and the white grandfathers , i apologize, the white house clearly said that the meeting between biden and putin there will be no way, i understand that biden is not just offended by putin . you probably saw that biden met with putin in a virtual reality, convinced him of something, promised something , offered to negotiate, and putin did not listen to all this at all, because he was determined for war, and this is biden, beastya, i think because the question is not even when the interlocutor perceives your argument when the interlocutor does not accept your arguments, you begin to think that because you did not choose the right words, and the question for a politician of such a level as biden is that the interlocutor ignores your argument that he

in principle, he was not going to accept everyone, or he was just wasting time and met with you just to bring the troops to a position to press, he perceived you as just some kind of puppet for his political entertainment , so i will talk to the president of the united states so that you can see how great he is, but it does not matter what will he say, because we have already decided to attack here, and what he didn't tell us, and then we saw it all after the victory, and why should i talk to him now, because when i talk to putin, it 's putin's capitalization, which means i won't be with him to talk, and therefore there will be no meeting, and therefore, by the way, it is not known whether putin will go there, because for putin, that he went to indonesia, an appropriate agenda is needed. well, at least he had a meeting with all the dynpin, a meeting with elegant fashion, a meeting with the president. well, and donets ivan one way or another, there will be a meeting with one of the western leaders. i started with macron. well, even though it’s humiliating again, i’m

meeting with maklon, and we don’t avoid biden. and if it turns out that biden is meeting, i’m ignored by everyone. let jesus pour the government misha with this come on, that's how it might look, but let's see. well, in principle, you can expect different things from putin, then he can just be afraid to go there, so he's paranoid, and in this sense, he can also think that he will go there, the americans will poison him , get infected with the coronavirus, or something else. well, because he is so i would do it, everyone would come to him , i would definitely try to do so, and in this sense , he can also hold on to the european however, i don't see, you understand, i don't see any platform for negotiations between russia and the united states, that's what the chinese say they learned they were official that they wanted

an american-russian dialogue for peace, but here too. the question is if you don’t want an american-russian dialogue, they need to put pressure on biden and putin. putin should just give up this magic that we hear from him because no one dialogue in impossible situations when the president of russia essentially does not recognize the fact of the existence of a neighboring state. well, biden now does not see the point of meeting with. would it be very strange, in fact, he can meet with putin only in a situation in which putin wants to meet with zelensky, you understand , putin wants zelensky to meet and capitulate, so let's meet with putin so that putin capitulates, it was right and fair, i still don't understand why zelensky has to capitalize when he doesn't want anything from putin, he doesn't need bryanska region, he is not asked, he does not say that putin should join or not

join somewhere, he does not learn this by life and, by the way, does not even conduct, does not offer to identify russia, although it was worth it, but putin has some positions to surrender in front of biden, raise troops from ukraine, stop the energy blackmail of europe, stop the blackmail with hunger, it is a platform to reject a destructive person whose tyrannical activities are engaged in by the leadership of the russian federation, it is big enough nataliya, let's talk about such a person close to putin, as it was at least before, let's talk is it so now ms. ksenia sobchak, she left the russian federation. we remember that she ran for the presidency of the russian federation, well, they allegedly ran the company was so strange, it was enough. well, it was clear to everyone that this is such an imaginary pseudo-opposition, a

pseudo-liberal, but now you know, she somehow set herself up, it seems to me, because she was fleeing from russia when they were already starting a case against her there through belarus, they again made witnesses to the suspects yes. by the way, they did not change the status to a suspect. nevertheless, it is somehow strange to flee through belarus, so why was she not detained in belarus to be detained on the case, you understand, there are two, there are two groups of people with whom he is in a special relationship with two families, one family is the family of anatoly sobchak whom he personally took to france when there was a criminal case of the russian federation against anatoly savchuk on some secret plane and then sobchak returned to russia already when putin became

president somehow died mysteriously, but putin has a serious relationship with these people, not only ksenia sobchak, i would say he is his goddaughter in general, but also with matyoxelny stobchak, lyudmila narusov, who , by the way, is a member of the federation council and who herself is in the council the federation allows what no one in russia does, part of the council of the federation goes, and even some oppositionists do not allow themselves when they ask at the plenary session of the general federation what are the borders in russia now, they cannot say, oh, they annexed these regions and you, and in which borders and everyone is mad at her this is one family, another family is yeltsin's family, where putin comes home with flowers to congratulate some birthdays and anniversaries on camera, they could do it, hello volodya, well , that's how no one talks to him and about these people we also don't know anything about where they are, what they are doing. recently i saw a statement against

yeltsin, which was anti-pusin, i don't remember for what reason, for some private reason. memorial center, she congratulated the memorial center with the nobel prize. they said that this is a heroic organization and again. so she can afford this performance. the state has some families untouchable, it’s the same that they didn’t do now the question and what happened to ksenia stolchak how did it happen that she left this side and because it’s a mafia state as far as i understood , the sobchak series just had a fight with tina cadillac, another fifa scumbag on which simply has no place to put a brand already, and this kandelak, who

is engaged in some kind of blackmail on social networks, decided that sobchak is trying to steal her business, another mafiosi used serhiy chemiza, so they went on such an offensive, but this offensive i see that in any case, when it reaches the tsar, he stops it a little on the brakes, and that's why sobchak will be careful, she will know exactly where her border is, if it turns out that she will now go further , i don't think much further, but if it happens, then you know it it means that the princess is standing, it means that they have already returned from something completely different than we imagine, and these families are not that they do not feel that he can ensure their safety, but they do not feel that he is staying there for a long time, they stop paying attention to his guarantees or to them can't them

don't give them more serious changes, so far there are no such changes, again, if sobchak left and nothing happened, they showed her israeli passport . she has every right to an israeli passport, uh, it's not some kind of fiction, and my grandfather's father is a russian , he is a jew by origin, well this is not a secret, well, from the point of view of the israeli law of return , she could have received this passport 100 times when she wanted it and many people, as we know in russia, received these passports israeli suddenly i see i never even thought i know all these i have known people since the 90s. well, mostly the majority, and i always knew about my jewish origin, and they knew about my jewish background. they never said that they somehow had something to do with it. oh, well, we are, of course, russian people. i understand, i feel , well, we are here, we came here to the jewish exhibition, but

we are only like people's deputies, i am knocking out these quotes . it's just laziness and you're not russian people anymore, you've stopped being russian what happened, all your grandparents are no longer russian people, but they just look to be honest, anecdotal and by the way, not very decent, because when everything was good you were spit on, you can to say to these jews that they are russian people, and as soon as you have already died, you are already all dancing in the raylex, running to the synagogue, demanding a certificate from an arab that he, uh, that you are jews, and i don't know either. so people, there is some kind of disrespect to themselves, i do n't know i would know in any situation not first, he did not deny himself