in a narv, anywhere, the key task was to restore the soviet union absolutely. so, the re-union was 2:0, and it was necessary to break ukraine, and after that they would be like houses of cards, they would collapse, all regimes, that's all, it was good until the 30th year of these drone missiles, it would fit into the concept of such a long-term victorious war of russia, a long-term conflict with the west, because it was clear from the very beginning that such a shock, a political shock in this area could not, well , cause a backlash, so to speak, from of the west, and then under the soviet union , russian troops reached the borders of nato, they essentially faced direct confrontation, and russia needed allies who could support them. in other words, these were deferred decisions, obviously, and iran

was one of those countries that discussed, but at that time there was a different government in iran, i do not want to say that these were moderates, that they are more moderate islamists, and because either these games are islamists - it was not the same as islamists as communists, yes, hmm but this previous government still wanted to maintain relations with the states and will somehow continue these negotiations, that is why they did not receive one hundred percent consent from iran, moreover, the iranians were very surprised and they at least pretended to be caught off guard by this proposal, and when raisi the butcher came. that is, these are people who are as close as possible to the guard corps of the islamic revolution. and these are the nkvd troops, and in principle it was

easy for putin to talk to them. that is, all these plans, all these ideas that they were discussed, they were simply implemented already during the projects were written yesterday, they were written , they were prepared already in july, the russian military was there, who watched it, and it was enough for putin to sign the last one, do the last year, that we are the alliance, we give you syria , we give you eh you we give you political protection in the un security council nuclear weapons nuclear weapons well, here i would argue with the iranians, the problem is not in technology, the problem is that it is more profitable for the iranians to keep the world on the hook, that is, a threat the production of a nuclear bomb by iran is more expensive than the nuclear bomb itself. so, a nuclear bomb. well, what is it? my primitive thinking says that

if something happens in your country, well, in fact , people have impoverished you on the one hand. it doesn't matter what you earn people there. they don't believe it. come on. that's not the case. the states come and say, let's go there. they say, no, we know who you are. we don't believe you. all israelis are shaytan. america is shaitan, the soviet union was a small shaitan, well, now there is less, and there, well , in other words, for them, they are still the same. no, they are all shaitans, because they are not the same as the soviets, and of course, they need allies simply to survive. they are afraid of this nuclear program, it is also for survival because they have all been there for 40-50 years they live like a park tub because they expect a strike from the united states of america saudi

arabia and israel and they are preparing to strike back or attack first this is the whole story expansion in the middle east, well, it revolves around this, another thing is that when this happens in the middle east, it is usually the sumian shiite conflict, the israeli-iranian confrontation and the topic of oil between saudi arabia, iran and suddenly suddenly this country that has not gotten out of nowhere suddenly finds itself in eastern europe with weapons, it enters to the war, provided that the number of the population sympathizes with ukraine early on, mr. oleksandr, i want to ask, but how did the europeans react to such and such a partnership, a direct military partnership, because we hear from one on the side of the europeans, they are very supportive of us, they are raising money, but the tanks are not on the other side, iran . a lot of the population of iran supports ukraine, but

the authorities are already silently handing over weapons, how did the europeans react to this? the provision of deadly weapons of drones that can also reach europe. sorry to fly too far, i will add a little to your question. does this mean that the war has really already begun, has already gone beyond the borders of the continent and is already a little bit like the third one, or where, according to some versions, it is called the fourth world war, is it possible to qualify it that way? well, in principle, putin would like it to acquire such signs of the fourth world war, that is, on the one hand, the alliance of countries that support ukraine, on the other hand, the alliance that supports russia only in there is only one iran in this alliance on the part of russia. i don't want to say unhappy. i really respect the whole country, even the dprk.

you see the taliban. well, what do they want to sell raisins to? well, they want to sell their raisins to anyone . that's why they voted to support ukraine. this is really the vote in the un. it showed that there is no alliance, the whole world is divided into three parts, on the one hand, there are countries that understand where is good and where is evil, for whom it is important where is good and where is evil, and on the other hand, next to russia, there is a group of absolute freaks of some kind four countries were found, which, yes, and in the middle, there is a rather large group. and putin is trying to appeal to it. these are those who believe that, well, there are some whites fighting other whites. but the truth is somewhere in the middle, and the americans, almost certainly, there is something there . -e confused englishwoman viper and so on and so on and so on to these countries, but in principle so far he is quite successful in pollinating them, i have to say i don't know

, that is, to be honest, the european reaction to the connection to this alliance and it seems to me that it could be early stronger, but i will tell you for sure that there is only one more humiliating option for the united states than the victory of russia, that is, the victory of russia and iran, that is, for them, um, um, um, how to say it. the incentive to support ukraine with the connection of iran became more that's why it's political. it was profitable for us. i guess we know how mr. putin plays, and it's quite obvious that at some point one of the iranian drones, having simply gone off course, can fly to some polish town, for example , or to some... e countries, the strength of the nerves of europeans there are constantly airplanes violating the airspace, and recently the russian orthodox

church in norway bought several houses literally near the norwegian military base. so it happens regularly there. in three places, yes, indeed, you asked the right question , when will this statement be heard at the official level that friends, we are already in the state of the third world war, politicians will never say this, yes, this is for politicians, this is, well, that is, it is happening, yes, that is, you understand that, don't you it's not the 20th century, when they officially declared war. yes, there is a problem with war. yes, there was at least mobilization, and then, somehow, hostilities began . and hmm, now they don't declare wars, now they don't even use the word war from the mayor or

there is some history there, anti-terrorist operation, self-assessment, everyone speaks with some euphemism, that's why, of course, the politicians don't want it, that's right there, mayer, if you mention him about the language, he already emphasized that we are not taking part in this war, he didn't come, he said no now the germans say that at least there is some positive news, we will not have difficulties, future difficulties, some will face some, and the citizens of the european union, in particular, the germans . we can cope because we will help or war, well, it is clear who chooses difficulties, i will not fight, that is, everything is clear here. that is, this is such a dilemma

that works wonderfully. i want to remind the audience who is visiting us today. the ambassador of ukraine in austria for 21 years, and i actually want to continue our conversation very interestingly with the question of how to discourage iran from helping russia, or are there any a-a mechanisms for this, some countries that can er-e help ukraine to stop this military support of russia. we understood that iran received something very, very sweet from russia, at the expense of which it is now uh, should we expect a strike from the united states on iran, or maybe israel, or maybe israel, when israel's first ballistic missiles are no longer drones and ballistic missiles will fly over the territory of ukraine. it is possible that this is a good question, pay attention to how the

americans formulate everything. we will apply such and such and such and such that you will shudder there, well, let's assume that this means no one knows the specifics, when they talk about iran, we are ready to apply all possible necessary means, and here they emphasize that these are not sanctions, attention, these are not sanctions, yes, weight this is not a bluff. as i said. no character, a new level of concern, so here it is. what is it about? well, it's iranian, we have a simpler story in america, more precisely , in americans, we all remember the fate of the otaku kasim soleimani, yes, he reminded me of the general. -and means the commander of the alkutz expeditionary force, a person with imagination, a person who, in principle , was a promoter and a key figure in the established

russian-iranian relations, and he is gone and gone and gone when he went out to the balcony to watch dawn. dawn flew to the balcony a drone and no man was driving a car at the bohdan airport a rocket fell no , that is, in other words, it is not solved in iran how it is solved well, let's say for now in russia with figures what about putin, what figures, what war, the use of weapons, there is nothing, but we know a whole series here, yes, point-blank killings, he, and which were carried out in relation to physicists, in relation to iranian, which developers, engineers, developers of drones, missile developers, nuclear bomb developers, the

vast majority of these point murders took place until the 15th year, but already after the 18th year, after the americans withdrew from the nuclear agreement, we see a whole series of murders, which were also carried out by drones, er, hmm, which were simply attached to machine guns, here they are israeli well, as they say, they did not take the israelis by the hand , er, if necessary, we will apply it, there are iranian insurgents, the insurgents are er, a left-wing organization , a terrorist organization, an insurgent organization that has been fighting against the iranian regime for a long time, that uses tourist acts against the leaders in its struggle, and here they take it upon themselves responsibility, who is behind this people? well, we do not know that this tactic will continue, the tactic will become the

main one, that is, yes, and i think that well, now they have already revealed information about one of the people involved in the sale of drones from the guard corps of the icelandic revolution, as well as his assistant there from the basij militia, their militia was recently killed by iranian protesters, approximately thus, for the production of iran's drones on the territory of syria. which are definitely not horrors, not shahedis, not horrors , there are three productions, one is in syria, one is destroyed, and one is in tajikistan. yes, but they are syrian drones, this is a syrian production

, it is constantly under attack by the israelis, that is taking into account the fact that the relations between israel and russia are complicated, and in principle russia gives the blue green light for the israelis to bomb these enterprises, and it is obvious that there is only one thing - this is not the topic, which is not the drones that are produced for the topic of israel, so far i just want a panel give alexander a small pass and ask about such, in my opinion , a defining event. and when the united states of america stationed in romania its legendary, i’m afraid to be mistaken, it seems the 101st airborne division. please tell me in your opinion what it is means for the course of this war and especially if you consider that the commander of this brigade has already done enough such excerpts of statements. he said that if you were needed, we will cross

its border with ukraine if such an order comes. what do you think? well, first of all we understand that it was authorized by a military man. he would never have said such words from himself personally. it was authorized. he was asked to say it. and the very fact of this division being in romania. what do you think it means? well, it seems to me that rather, this is rather the routine of this war, compared to what russia is doing and what russia is allowing itself , well, the united states. i remember that in the 14th year there were voices, why aren't there more of ours, like this is the butsundeground of these boots? lands next to ukraine, why don't we even do this ? eight years have passed and finally these bootsander-hounds appeared, too late too little. well, this statement was made at the level of the head of the pentagon, not the highest echelon

. yes, it is pleasant for us, but it is probably not necessary to reevaluate it. rather one to clear the conscience before with its internal electorate, taking into account the elections in the states, well, on november 8, that is, at least they, the democrats, have to show that they are tough guys, that they work there and do everything necessary. and in the american understanding, booting aground is just the masses in absolutely such a situation. they should appear somewhere close to this by putin, who has completely lost his sense of reality, the g20 congress is a topic that will become more and more discussed every day in the next two weeks, and we can see that on the eve of this congress these stories are already being played out, and russia's rejection of the grain agreement is being played out,

there are statements about the transfer of early ballistic missiles that we discussed today, and there are radical statements from the leadership of germany and the leadership of the european union about how important the meeting of the g20 can become, and we understand that the main topic and perhaps even the only one the topic of the discussion will be this particular war, because the diplomats do not speak about it, but we say openly that this is already being played out, the third world war, and it there is even a transfer of wax from the united states to the e-e contingent to romania . the premise of the fact that the confrontation at some moment can go to a high level of escalation of the meeting of the g20, what it can be about

and whether this meeting can somehow lower this degree or should we expect any real decisions from them at all, i do not think that within the framework of the meeting some solutions can be reached, uh, from what is announced, only the meeting between sentian pine and biden is expected to be real, because after the re-election of siti, he is now the sole leader of china, a person whose status is enshrined right in the party charter, well, that says a lot, that is he is strengthening his position and from these strong positions he is starting to negotiate with biden about, i don’t know, the world order or let’s say about the conditions of coexistence or g2 well, i don’t think that the chinese

are capable of g2 china with all its power now is not going through the best of times and obviously the best and the worst of times are still ahead, so it seems now that their strategy is to survive rather than to engage in expansion, but at least eh well, the efforts they are putting in is to demonstrate that they are strong and this is the main intrigue is another eh well let's say this is one intrigue that we started talking about since the meeting in uzbekistan when there was something and there was an agreement there, again, it was not mentioned anywhere, but it exists if it exists because of the fact that china and india agreed with putin what he

will end the war by the end of the day, it seems that such a conversation was absolutely true. i agree. yes, i, i agree. this is more of an assumption, a beautiful, interesting assumption, but all in view of the remarks that we heard during this summit, that's all that, in principle, we see now and everything related to the question should not be about what the meeting of the g20 will be about. and what the g20 will be about, because it is not completely clear now, the question is, well, it is an attempt to bring these growing economies to those that have long been recognized as large economies of the world and you make some kind of modus operandi module of the modular wendy between them, but it is not produced in and even frankly speaking, i have no idea that

the big twenty can make any decisions at all in the current state that can be compared with the big seven well, the same and about what is the un going on, where do we see how this mr. nebenzia is sitting, so is the representative of russia. and he is absolutely serious about the combat mosquitoes that britain, ukraine, and the united states allegedly breed. i don't remember before that they were sending geese. they watch they watch american tv series and then they retell the stories, remember there was this guy girkin told that on the malaysian plane there were dead people who fell, which means that there, in fact, no one died there, they just packed it all up, that's when sherlock, because it's about these mosquitoes, it's also from the series sherlock , they watched this series before. that is, we didn't receive this e and that sherlock and these elements we are approaching the final awareness of the global community e loss of efficiency of all e-e

structures and bodies that were formed on the basis of the end of the second world war, well, the post -war system of international security has definitely been destroyed. the same organization of the united nations was conceived for two if the missions of two goals, firstly, to prevent such a war and and if it has already happened, then somehow get out of this war and it does not cope with it anywhere, this war that is happening now at this level of escalation, which is now enough to reshape the security organs and others institutions in the world or the war must go to the next level and already then and then a change in the world order will begin, which, let's be frank, everyone is talking about, putin is talking, the eu is talking, the united states is talking, journalists are talking experts, and the post-war world order has lost itself in the

world should be reset, but i want to understand that this war is escalating at this level, this is enough for a reset, well, the key point made is that the interests of the countries are very different and to reset, well, they are rebooting the world the order of the winners, they are then simply, i am in the order of doing this, and how can you reset the world order in conditions when, e.e., coalitions of groups of countries, large countries have different absolutely multi-meter, there must be one loser so that he is a disease, even if even if there is no winner, there must be one a big piece, what is the other one, well, we won't be, of course well, we can say podillia yes, there is a piece of influence in the un, a piece of an economic piece, a piece of ideological influence, and for now we can not share it. of course, but on the other hand, it has to be a specific winner who will be the

primary source of establishing new rules, we are the winners i think that this is a rather complicated situation, that is, we can look at it from the 19th century, we see every time these world wars that took place and there they ended with the defeat of one country and one effort each and the winners if they were to establish new rules of the game, where would they include countries so that which one was victorious, and so it happened. well, the exception is the first world war, and many people now nod to the same first world war world war and they say that it led to the second world war, we, and that is, in this situation, there is nothing yet, as far as i am concerned, formulas that clearly describe hmm what to do with russia with russia, even which lost because we cannot buy you can't just take russia and carry out

denazification or nuclearization. well, the others, which everyone is already talking about, because without all this, we will receive the same wound, that is, russia has lost. what is the formula for it, it's just money for weapons, it will arm itself to the teeth and again threaten the world, the last question very briefly, we promised to return to the topic of israel, should ukraine now put a lot of pressure on israel, seeking military aid from it? well , why? well, you can pressurize , we are here. i would say. after all, we won't get anything, but i think that israeli politicians should feel a certain remorse, it's difficult, considering just their skin, that's the way it is.

so that they understand that they will be judged in this case, in this case, they will be judged not only by the voters in the next election. and the story, thank you, is very incredibly interesting, such a deep ether is structural . for me, it was a revelation. for example, the story of the supply of iranian weapons to russia, which was planned since december therefore, i think that our viewers learned something from our extremely interesting professional guests. thank you very much, director of the center for middle eastern studies and oleksandr scherba , ukrainian diplomat, ambassador of ukraine to austria 14-21-year-olds night watch, maria vasylyova and ganplinsky, see you on the air, tell me honestly, how is it a sin to complain? some extreme situations bother me. i don't have any such feeling

. it is possible to preserve it. i imagine such a bubble around the house and nothing will fly here for sure. next time, try again, choose a small calming amulet, something that fits in the palm of your hand, it can be some special stone , button or ring, it evokes pleasant memories and a good feeling so that this thing is always at hand when you feel negative, take the amulet in the palm of your hand and concentrate on the sensations it evokes, mentally describe the shape, color, weight, it should stabilize this technique in your self-help first aid kit, more here in the morning or at work. you smile at your neighbor, the neighbor will thank the barista for his coffee with a nice

tip . a warm scarf on them and part of the money from the dowry will go to a bronik or a fairy tale for another of your neighbors, every day of our life, every step, every act can protect those who protect us, thanks to you , our dear defenders and protector, we smile in the morning we thank each other the border of freedom, the border of dignity, the border of humanity, the border of indomitability, the border of victory, the state border service of ukraine, the primacy of honor, the rules of a

warm country . check your apartment, check the wiring, take care of alternative means of heating, make an action plan in an extreme situation, help each other , let's beat the winter together