including the merit of the correctional headquarters, which is also already gaining some experience, it is more and more developing the direction of helping families and counseling families and in general, providing assistance to everyone who is connected with the release of our servicemen mr. colonel, for your service and for participating in the broadcast of the espresso tv channel, volodymyr petukhov, now i have to clear my throat and read the deputy head of the research department of the support of internal communication activities of the research center for humanitarian problems of the armed forces of ukraine was working now live on the espresso tv channel together with khrystyna yantskiv" who pushed putin to war это очень тонкие вещи the british edition of the times admits that the secretary of the

russian council of security mykola petrushev and the director of the fsb oleksandr bornikov actually convinced president vladimir putin to launch an invasion of ukraine when and who made this decision and did putin really need to be convinced to go to war in ukraine, not if he returns for the sixth time, or will israel's military policy change aid to ukraine with the new prime minister in the pre-election rhetoric he promised to consider the supply of weapons for the armed forces of the armed forces of ukraine, how the fulfilled promises will be affected by netanyahu's old cooperation with putin , friends threw themselves on armored personnel carriers this day has come, the ukrainians overcame the levy announced for the week in just a day and a half, and it was not 50 and for 60 british battleships spartan, despite the war and economic problems, more than 200 million hryvnias were collected for armored personnel carriers. how was it? see

svoboda life. congratulations. today, november 4, avatar svoboda life my name is sashko shevchenko , we tell and analyze the main events of the day, we start with the news about who could beat vladimir putin to a full-scale attack on ukraine on tuesday so the secretary of the security council of russia mykola petrushev and the director of the fsb oleksandr bortnikov actually convinced president vladimir putin to launch an armed invasion of ukraine about this is written by the british edition of the times, there it refers to the not yet published book of the journalist in the tent za, who, according to him, communicated with russian figures familiar with the history of the preparation of the attack as the author claims that bortnikov and patrushev were the main supporters of the so-called preventive strike on ukraine, arguing that it is necessary to save russia from a strategic threat that is allegedly

growing from the west. as it is claimed, playing the role of not an ideologue but a performer who sometimes showed doubts , the principled decision was made, as claimed in the publication de times, by the end of the summer however, in 2021, the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, sergei lavrov, was tasked with trying to obtain major concessions from the west in order to avoid war. according to the journalist, lavrov himself wanted to achieve a peaceful outcome of the confrontation and was convinced that putin also wanted this, but who and how made the decision to invade ukraine and also about how the russian government is currently reacting to the situation at the front, let's talk further, we are already in touch with a russian political scientist andriy piankovskyi good evening good evening, which is referred to by journalists dates on he refers to the officials in the russian government. how reliable do you think the

information they allegedly passed on to him is, in particular, that bortnikov and patroshev could be the main geologists of the invasion of ukraine? well, there is no logical passage in your book, such an impression of a very superficial commentator, he uses then with sauces, well, besides, uh, all these correspondences remind me of the showdowns. the main russian war criminals who among them is more to blame and who is less wanted a particularly touching episode about how lavrov complained to some of his university friends that he thought that putin was the only thing that would stop this war and hoped for the future this is what god riveted and

gutted, they presented to her friend the so-called obmeltsion group in putin's side, which is ready not only for war, but for war with ukraine , they earn this concept of limited nuclear wars, the use of tactical nuclear weapons , not only in the global wars of modern-day and regional wars, not so much because he tried to change the russian military doctrine several times, but there were two very influential people behind the port, who are exerting influence on putin more influence than bortnikov, and then we will take them together - these are the brothers who are chuchuks magical yury kovalchuk. here they are both such perfect extreme ultra-emperians, and in the development of these views of putin on the possibility of victory even the war is not only against ukraine, but they have played with the west, they

have played a bigger game. mr. hosnydkovsky really chose rubber. it is mentioned in this publication. what are we talking about? is it bortnikov with patroshem or is it someone else? and it doesn’t affect it at all. no, it ’s not available at all. and that for 15 years they were engaged in blackmail, it was a very effective tool, when i think that it lived its time, we accepted ukraine in 2009, in short, in nato there was no reaction to the war in georgia to the annexation of a separate and putin did not need anyone's persuasion, he is one of us among them war criminals, look at

his speech in the 14th year after the annexation of crimea, this is the stuff of a convinced fanatic putin. and then, what is the point i will say this again. it will be very interesting in the future process. when it will be determined that the world is to blame for the mortality, only putin and the reich bortnyk will be shaken out. then the punishments of war criminals will be explained in detail there, the influence of one and the other well, maybe it will be interesting, yes, probably during the process. putin so let's say so, the times publication also

says that, well, patrushevy bordnikov insisted on a so-called preventive strike in order not to exaggerate the growing threat of the west. what do you think, either bortnikov, or someone else, or putin in the kremlin really could describe such a similar threat, or is it still a cover-up, and in this case, this is what is written in the times, this is also, again , this is a legend, you understand, a psychologist is needed here, we understand, it starts like that in general, or in short, the west is the russian rulers and they are spreading it for 300 years, and they have become fed up with the influence of the west in the russian society. what it can do for this influence can have a detrimental effect on their replacements and change, in principle, the functionary of the russian empire you have different personal and podstasok, the soviet one is turned on, but when

you repeat it 1000 times for these problematic purposes, it works psychologically, we, uh, laws, and you start not believing in them. i think that uh, that’s all these uh in order to speak now they have already convinced themselves of this life, so i would say, well, let's also talk about what has been spilled by er decisions. kherson, ah, hmm. what do you think is the situation putin found himself in now, taking into account that, according to analysts' estimates, again, here's the information from the sources of sky news that kherson may have to be abandoned by russia. how can you predict what will happen next? yes, putin and others. i think that the most important issue in kherson is putin himself

, because from a military point of view, any military expert, including from the russian general staff, will tell you that the evacuation of troops on the right bank of the dnieper is necessary. the meaning of the ego was that i served myself as a gift for the future in the offensive . well, that is exactly what i am talking about. but politically, this is a colossal blow, and proportionally, first of all, personally, to putin, first of all, personally, this is the third slap in a row. only kyiv in kharkiv, kherson, that's why i'm now getting a signal every day, uh, protivovenshchyny , they took down the flags there, they're leaving, no, they're not leaving, they're changing into civilian clothes, they're going to suffer, it's going to be a new stoligrad, and so on . i think that this reflects the fact that определённости что выписие, at first the military professional insists on leaving the left side will be the coast, and putin seems to me first of all to be

putin. desperate themes are showing themselves, well. and the last question , the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, valery zaluzhny, recently stated that in several areas of the front the russian army increased its shelling three times. these forced attacks doom this army to defeat. these are also aimed at somehow distracting attention from the ukrainian forces and removing pressure on kherson for money if it is a political disaster that i personally help putin was not worried, thank you very much, mr. gospodkovsky was in touch with us. andriy piantkovsky, a

russian political scientist from washington, joined us in our era. well, now i will urgently read the news for you in the us ministry of defense. literally a few minutes before our broadcast, it announced a new an aid package for ukraine worth 400 million dollars, which will include 45 t-72 tanks. this was reported by reuters journalist idris elit on twitter. let's move on. ukrainian artillerymen are striking russian positions on the border of kharkiv and for this, among other things, the luhansk oblasts use its artillery installations hail, as it happens in the story of the reuters agency, they are determined to leave to complete the task and drive back so that everything will be fine

, so 47.5 the task is to destroy the enemy, the given targets are coming, we cover him per unit 567,567 uah 30.05

we are moving forward, pushing the enemy out of our territories , this is already a direct proof that we have coordination and skills, we have been fighting for 8 years as there are no countries of the group of seven and australia agreed to establish a fixed ceiling price for russian oil at the end of november, this was reported by the publication router with reference to own sources , what exactly will be the upper limit of the price of russian oil is still unknown, it is still being negotiated, but it will be revised, sources told reuters that restrictions on the price of sea oil deliveries from russia are planned to be introduced in order not to allow the destabilization of the global oil market due to the effect of the eu and sam sanctions against the russian federation official announcements about

such an agreement from gs7 not yet what the limit price for russian oil can change on the world energy market and how it will affect the geopolitical landscape, we will now ask our correspondent in the eu, zoryana stepanenko, she is now in touch with us zoryana hello, what is known at the moment , today i mean the heads of diplomacy from the group of seven just met in münster, germany, but anyway as you mentioned, there really weren't any official announcements about this decision, only a message from the raider publication later, its device journal. of the most powerful economies in the world were developing a plan to implement the style of marine oil prices, which should come into effect on december 5. it was supposed to become a kind of guarantee that european and american sanctions aimed at depriving russia of money

for the war will not block the world oil market . now oil prices are so to speak they float, they are tied to indices, and the group of seven decided not to limit them by introducing a discount, but to make the price fixed, several sources of the reuters publication claim, in order not to allow the president of russia which is one of the largest suppliers of oil in the world to reduce the supply and thus increase their oil if they remain tied to the brand standard. so , the group of seven and australia also abandoned the floating rate and agreed to a fixed price, as the reuters source explained. to maintain stability in the market, now sashko, the intrigue is what exactly will this price be, there is an agreement and the decision is still ongoing, it should be again, as the publication writes, in the coming week and agreed on a fixed price as needed and review and this is the drawback of the scheme, say sources of the publication, since the review will require more meetings of the coalition. well, you, accordingly, more

bureaucracy. therefore, the price limit for marine oil should come into effect on december 5, for petroleum products, and on february 5, the ministry of finance of the united states, in particular, claimed that this would reduce russia 's earnings but not deliveries to consumers, russia previously stated that it will not sell oil to countries that introduce ceiling prices, reuter writes that they want more details of the plan of gsvan and australia hear the carriers in stable oil prices would allow them to feel more confident when entering into contracts. well, not to be afraid that price fluctuations will lead to the fact that they will deliver oil to land at a price above the limit, which could potentially give the same insurers a sanction, but official announcements how will everything work as we said, there is no longer sashko thank you zoryana it was zoryana stepanenko correspondent of radio svoboda in the eu with the latest information about the agreement on the maximum price for russian oil turkey currently

does not withdraw its reservations regarding the accession of sweden and finland to nato turkey, along with hungary , are the last two nato member countries whose parliaments have not yet ratified the protocol on the accession of sweden and finland to the alliance nato secretary general jenn stoltenberg visited turkey to persuade it to ratify by the end of this year in the protocol on the accession to nato of the two scandinavian countries, the bloomberg agency previously wrote that the turkish parliament is unlikely to ratify the protocol by the end of the year and may not even have time to do so before of the turkish parliamentary elections that will be held in june next year, turkey is demanding from sweden the cessation of activities of kurdistan separatists, the extradition of suspects and the complete abolition

of restrictions on the sale of weapons to ankara. nato as a signal to moscow that the doors of the alliance remain ajar. therefore, it is time to congratulate finland and sweden as full members of nato. their accession will our alliance is stronger and our peoples are safer in all dangerous times it is even more important to complete the process of their accession in order to avoid misunderstandings and miscalculations in moscow and to send a clear signal to russia that the doors of nato remain open, we must show the parliament because this issue does not lie in the policy plane that these two countries use concrete steps, so the timetable for ratification depends on these two countries and the steps they will take. and about that, when will sweden and finland join donato? and why is it important also for ukraine, let's talk further with us

, professor, director of the center for international security and euro-atlantic integration, uzhgorod national university, ihor todorov. good evening, let's start with what nato secretary general genstoutenberg said. he says that the accession of sweden and finland is important to show moscow that the alliance's doors are open why is this signal important, and why is it important in particular for ukraine? i think that what the secretary general said is really a signal to moscow that her desperate attempts to hinder the euro-atlantic integration of ukraine are doomed to the rights and accession of the two scandinavian countries. this will definitely strengthen the alliance, its northern flank. there were hopes that

it would be successful before the end of the year, but i think that turkey continues to negotiate. and it seems that they negotiated something when before the turkish government did agree to the nato summit, but here they have such a successful situation to redirect the parliament, so the parliament can slow down something. but i think that the countries of the alliance are primarily the united states of america, because turkey seems to have mainly traded with it the issue will be resolved with regard to ukraine, the precedent of the acquisition of membership by sweden and finland is definitely very important, because it seems that this will take place

without an action plan regarding membership. that membership is possible only through the ptc, but here it is still worth refraining from full analogies with ukraine, although an application has been submitted, and this very application is about this . this is exactly the desire to obtain membership without a ptc. the point is that u.e. in nato as it is known that armies are not entering and the countries and among the objective requirements there is a certain level of democracy for sweden and finland, there are no such questions because these countries are members of the european union and they

are all right with that, there is a question about our country. with the european union are the conditions that ukraine has promised to fulfill by the end of this year and we have really done a lot and here we need to prove that it is not only our armed forces that are really completely nato well, states and societies must be ready to fulfill some conditions. by the way, this was all very well discussed in our annual national programs in the context of the ukraine nato commission under the auspices of the ukraine nato commission and it must be said that these annual national programs were implemented and

they are very similar in content with the action plan regarding membership, that is, i believe that ukraine still has reasons to take an accelerated path to the alliance, although it is conditional to say that the decision of the bukharev summit in 2008 that ukraine and georgia will be nato members remains valid that is, in fact, the road is quite long, but between the official announcement and the acquisition of membership, i hope that we will be able to implement this , in particular, using the positive experience of sweden and finland, but there is another aspect, if we compare sweden, the fedent of ukraine, this is what is now in ukraine the war is ongoing, there is an open, er, armed

conflict, how realistic is this factor a even under the conditions of fulfilling the requirements for democratic reforms and so on, if the war continues, how realistic is it, well, frankly, i will say to get a consensus among the nato member countries, when the war is going on in our country, it is probably so impossible that there are countries that openly support us. and that is great, but there are countries in particular, the president of bulgaria said, what kind of membership in nato can we talk about while ukraine is at war? but we all hope for victory victory as soon as possible and after the end of the war at some stage, that is, such a step of acquiring membership

will be possible. of course, now in the conditions of the escalation of the war. i remind you that decisions are made by consensus . unanimously, and uh, that all 30 countries in the current conditions of the war uh, uh, should stand up for ukrainian membership, there is no need to hope. and let's go back to the topic of the actual entry of sweden and finland into the alliance , turkey's demands, in particular, to these two countries. how do you think that finland will make concessions to turkey sooner, but you mentioned about uh, how about turkey, i will quote to you, it trades with the usa, in particular with other members of the alliance, but if it is about such a demand as uh, the cessation of activities kursk separatists, in particular in sweden, but i don't know how sweden is ready to agree here with turkey. well, i think what is this demand? it

is in the public space and it is essentially used to slow down. in fact, in turkey, there are somewhat different requirements in the military sphere and in the political sphere. so, it seems to me that i am an optimist in this respect that finland will soon come to a certain compromise in order to gain membership in nato, because we all understand that such demands are made by individual countries in conditions when the country outside of nato, when it is inside, there may be certain deviations, by the way, i'm sorry , there are also many questions about democratic principles in turkey, but these questions are not

asked because it is already an option. turkey has long been seeking to purchase american f16 fighter jets. but there is no unity in america on this issue of whether to sell or not to sell these fighter jets. well, this also obviously acts as a certain obstacle on the way of sweden and finland to nato. how do you think they will go? the united states is here for supplies to turkey, i frankly hope so, because er, this is not only a matter of american-turkish relations, it is a geopolitical issue that is very acute in the current conditions, and er, i hope that a compromise will be found. that is, i am not sure that the united states will fully comply with turkey's demands, but in turkey, i apologize to the united states, it also has

its own levers of influence on the same turkey, and probably such a compromise will be found, that is, it is not necessary that the fighter jets themselves will be transferred, but something else it is possible. yes, it is difficult to say about specific things here because they are usually not in the public sphere. and finally, when do you think these two countries, including all of finland, will join nato? there was information from other publications that even the following it won't happen next june. well, i also think that those optimistic statements about the end of the year are too optimistic. but during the next year, i think that this issue will be solved positively for sweden and finland very thank you for your comment with us was igor todorov

, professor, director of the center for international security and euro-atlantic integration of the uzhgorod national university, meanwhile, in israel, the results of the early parliamentary elections have already been tallied, by the way, there have already been 5 elections in less than 4 years. well, the winner, and therefore the next prem veterans of zray politics, the leader of the likut benimin party, netanyahu and his coalition partners will be the prime minister. they will have 64 mandates in the book, where a total of 120 deputies sit , but the government will not be the most right-wing recently, many are worried that the far-right party led by itamar benhir is part of the coalition. the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi , has already congratulated benymin natalyagu, writing on twitter that ukraine and israel have common values ​​and challenges that now require effective cooperation.