played putin in a way that putin did not expect. because putin long wanted to get out of the grain deal, he and her from her. he wanted to get out from the first weeks . so that this famine does not affect the reputation of the russian federation in any way, in principle, no way that the countries of the global south cannot think that it is russia's fault, why does he need a migration crisis in europe, changes in european chickens, he is betting on it this is important a stake in the war with ukraine but at the same time, he also cannot simply lose the favor of the countries of the global rooster, they decided that if uh, let's say there will be this uh, hunger in uh, in the head of the global rooster

is organized and it will be possible to blame ukraine well well, it will be fine, and when they came out, how did they come out, they say this, that means ukraine violated the security of the grain corridor , shelled sevastopol, and we are forced to. won at the start, he did not sign one agreement, he signed one agreement with ukraine, one agreement with russia, these are different agreements, if russia withdraws from its agreement, it does not automatically cancel the agreement with ukraine , so it was necessary to sign one year . it seems that they didn't really want to. it was their mistake, so turkey and ukraine and the un say our agreement continues to operate, so what should they do in such a situation, or can they stop the implementation of ukraine by turkey? everyone can do this agreement

they say, oh, they can't, they don't have enough strength to shoot a couple of grain trucks, it's always enough and they block the inspection, after all, they can physically block it, but then a simple question arises. stops who is to blame, russia means that it is no longer possible to put the blame on ukraine, if it is not possible to put the blame on ukraine, then this is what the russians are telling putin, and you will be the one responsible. let us not think about how you will block the grain corridor and about how you will get out of the situation with a normal facial expression, as you want. well, i will say that ukraine has given me security guarantees. well, say what you want. the main thing is that they work. this means that russia returned to its part of the agreement because it realized that it will be responsible for the disruption. this is just an ordinary chess party. erdogan knows how to play such chess as blackmail.

we were saying, i am asking from finland. sweden is better than putin because he is an electoral politician. putin was once taken by the scruff of the neck and put in a chair. of the president of the russian federation, he sits there glued to the ground, he has never won any election, he has never fought with competitors, he has no such experience, erdogaz has been doing this all his life , he does nothing else at all, he has been engaged in political struggle all his life, and now he definitely understands how to work, even at the level of power, how to blackmail how to get around, that is, it is developed in him, you can say at the level of instinct well , putin was playing with him in such a group, by the way, now erdogan is calling on putin to withdraw his troops from ukraine v vitaliy erdogan is now trying to be such a dove of peace in the matter of russia's war against ukraine, but in reality, it seems to me that way. maybe i'm not right not to correct you that this is some kind of agreement that putin overheard. come on

, i'll tell you publicly that you're withdrawing troops there, but in reality i support you. no, i don't think it's that simple. i don't think it's an agreement . it's putin's agreement. it's going to be agreed. i am convinced that a politician such as kardan absolutely does not want russia to dominate crimea, he definitely wants to knock her out of there, but he is not the one to participate in this, erdogan, on the other hand, wants to get rich at the expense of russia, he is doing it grain at reduced prices, money for this hub whose it can never be if gas is supplied at reduced prices , there are many economic preferences, russian oligarchs who come to turkey keep money in turkish banks, that is, there is an interest, it is

diverse and, at the same time, the leader is happy nato member countries, he also remembers this, and along with this, as the head of a member country, he is still trying to exert pressure on greece. that is, it is again a whole chessboard on this whole chessboards, they he does not talk, rest let me say yes, let me say so he is just looking at where his interest is in this case, but he went with this, he is crawling, he has elections soon, he needs to sell himself as a turk as a global player, before he sold himself as a person who ensured their economic well-being, but you probably saw for yourself how turkey lived there for the last time, ciri, or any person who just moved to turkey , she saw how turkey is developing, i have to say that i started eating in turkey before i was reprimanded, and of course, when i come now, well, i just see that it is just a different country, economically, but she has been poor for the past few years, poor precisely because this always

happens, this is such a trick, unlimited by long power. at first, you do everything right, then when no one can stop you, you bring the country into the hands of the wonderful portuguese dictator antony olivera odesa lazar, he was generally a brilliant economist. well, they passed the economist, a professional professor, he was appointed prime minister to the position of minister of finance, he was completely portugal was a poor peasant country , he raised from the economic districts and everyone was delighted and gave him all the power and he used this power for three, almost 30 years. well, of course, somewhere in 20 to 15 years, it’s not greed. and you lose your instinct when it’s just everything. you perceive only loyal people, you don’t want to listen to anyone who likes you it's normal to criticize. when you've been in office for a long time, even democratic countries, that's how angels scare merkel. the press was against some things and

the coalition was, but you stop perceiving this nerve because you think i've been here for so many years, i know myself how i can make a mistake. it's simple, but it's not simple, it's a politician who needs to be rethought all the time, and that's why it all ended with the fact that this whole salazar regime collapsed after the death of his king. literally, in a few years, a similar situation suddenly appeared, he began to lose economic and there are a lot of such examples, but we can still talk, let's talk about israel, this is also a very good example, because the prime minister is old, new, near the track, he is the father of the israeli economic miracle when he was the minister of economy , finance, but then again, for a long time the position of the prime minister was already under-economic, and so was evdogan, the economy is falling, so it is necessary to say well, yes, of course, it is possible that i make some mistakes with the lira, in general, it is a complete shag, but turkey is a great state in your country, it was once a great state turkey only during the time of the attack and then everything is some kind of average player. and now we all listen

, we are here to calm russia down, then with the intervention of a collaborator, we will end the war here, this is a brilliant election program. he is stopped for these reasons . let's already mention israel. let's move on to the topic of the fact that he won the elections in israel and he is such a person for ukraine. well, i don't know , maybe he's not loyal enough, maybe you don't agree with me. nevertheless, he was always more friendly there from 2009 to 2021 with the russian federation, and when even there the united states called on him not to recognize the annexation of crimea there in 2015, it seems the 14th year when the resolution was still adopted then did not agree. well,

israel. now we see that it also does not really want to provide us with air defense and the weapons that we are asking for. will something change and what will it depend on? look at which one is loyal. neither to russia nor to ukraine. the united states is not loyal there, not even to israel, it is an outfit loyal to the city, this is a politician of the ordon type, it is essentially such an israeli ordon or erdoğan of israel and softly they know who among them was the first beginning it was this type of politician who appeared i i said at the beginning of the thousand , we saw that the democratic principles of israel, nevertheless, from this point of view, the meeting is a more democratic system. the same turkey is possible, such a style of management was the prime minister continuously for 15 years. in the classic israeli political system, but the classic israeli political system does not exist because it is not integrated in 15 years as prime minister, he lost his position for a year only because

there was an absolutely bizarre coalition from very right-wing to very left-wing parties, and i wrote a year ago that this coalition will not last long because i am not these people, except for the hatred of them, they have absolutely nothing in common with each other, they have absolutely different views on what should happen next in israel, how can such people rule the country together. well, this is her fell apart despite all the good faith of their attempts towards russia, this is also a completely specific story when netanyahu was the prime minister of israel for the first time, no special sympathies for the interests of russia . he did not have the internet at all in israeli politics, he is known for how he became a strong israeli politician, that he is a person with by the experience of life in the united states of america is very strongly connected with the american he speaks english with an american accent just like an american he generally he lived there in the house

of president trump when trump was not president, they were friends there as billionaires and budding politicians, well, that is, these are deep ties with america, and such a person, of course, taking into account the strategic relations of the usa with israel, should have made such a career in uh, israeli politics, but where did it come from russia took it out of necessity because it came by itself, you know. no one called there, but the situation in the middle east changed so much that russian troops appeared right next to the borders of israel, which was not the case even in the times of during the great wars in the middle east, the soviet union sent advisers there, provided equipment to the arab countries, but it never had real military contingents there, it could be easily used from there, as the president of egypt did, one perfectly with puppets. i want the soviet military advisers to go and go. if now your gray president will say together that he

wants someone to go, you are better off for her. and this simply means that russia controls the airspace gray , in fact, the entire effectiveness of israeli aviation is fighting iran in syria depends on whether russia is ready to turn a blind eye to this work. russia has a special relationship with tehran. tehran, in turn, controls two radical organizations, one of which is located in israel in the palestinian authority in the gas sector and fires missiles at israel, the other is located in lebanon, and i can also attack israel with rockets, that is, they suddenly became very dependent on russia more than on the soviet union. weapons against israel, as it was there during these

great wars, but he did not fight. israel could hope that he would defeat the egyptian, jordanian , syrian army. it was winning now. make it worse that this is simply necessary the reason that if the sky is closed sooner or later these drones will appear there, why are they testing ballistic missiles early and what is happening today in our country will happen tomorrow in tel aviv, well, it's real, no, no, he was one of the first to understand this reality . he decided that he needed a special relationship with putin to solve this problem strategically, it's not his personal approach, the late prime minister of japan believed that that he

needs a personal relationship with putin to solve the royal problem, this is a rather illusory attitude because it can work at some point and then stop working, but there is no point in this, he spent his whole such a long career hoping on you know on the adequate of putin and on what he can say you know i am the israeli leader who can form relations with trump putin at the same time and sign agreements with arab countries who else can just a global solution because without putin there is no control over the goals without trump there is no recognition of israel and jerusalem as the capital of israel, and i managed to do all this, no matter how he behaves now, this is a new situation, i think he has not calculated yet, well, that is, maybe he calculated somehow, i

was not the prime minister, now he will sit down and be calculate this situation as it is better for him, i can tell you what he will do, i do not think that he will give weapons, but he will try to seize the role of mediator from erdogan because he has trump cards. he can communicate with putin, he can communicate with zelensky, but he can what can't he do , he can communicate with the americans , it is clear that he had a better relationship with trump than with biden, but with trump he is also like you, they are talking to each other, representatives of the same group of people, this is erdoğan for biden, this is a difficult foreign partner is somehow not there for biden - it is a difficult partner, but he is not a foreigner, he is

his own and he can be trusted by israeli intelligence, and this rob is changing the most sensitive information provided in principle will know practically everything that biden knows and can even more because the capabilities of israeli intelligence in russia may be greater, as it does not sound strange, than the american capabilities, i could, i would say from a short distance, observe how the american israeli diplomats work in moscow a lot years i am quite often convinced that israeli diplomats in their understanding of certain specific things are more effective than american diplomats and they are not afraid to take risks, this is also a feature of israeli politics. i am not afraid to take risks there. so now we will see something else, but it is important here that they played correctly the ukrainian

side, because you understand that it is not for nothing now that he cannot brush off zelensky, first of all, because there is prestige in israeli society and ukraine there they support ukraine and zelensky himself, you know, there is no one there, unlike lapid or benet, he is such a personification of israeli nationalism in such a global sense of the word, this is the right-wing government, it is a government for jews, and zelensky is the most influential jew in the world, as they say in israel, he was elected, yes, it is real this is reality, if we say this, listen , let some non-jew putin beat you. he is not jewish after all, well, so that we don't think about putin , the fact is that the war between russia and ukraine is of no great importance to us. but for the israelis, it matters

it matters because you are basically throwing people who are much closer to you and a country that absolutely calmly elects a jew as its president, that can appoint an ethnic jew as the minister of defense, the prime minister of the law, in opposition to the country that demonstrates cave-like anti-semitism as the russian leaders have already begun to do this almost without hiding, and no one can afford to ignore this trend, the question is how he will get out of this situation, because it is clear that it will be difficult for him to simply start supplying weapons. he wants to play a-bank if he needs the americans now, the question is what he needs, well , what should we say to him, hands are untied, why were they allowed to restore order somewhere in some territories of the palestinian authority, that the americans turned a blind eye to some new construction in the settlement , what does he like? the previous one didn’t need it not even a rag it always needs 25 more

houses there and that’s about it what is the usa ah but but yes but you are against it be against it but i will build you say what against and i can provide some air defense systems of the ukrainians at the same time, but we have to agree with you that you close your eyes here, that you don't bother me with this second state because it won't exist, you just keep silent, you don't express that's what you started to create oh and we're afraid of an escalation be afraid of an aggravation, but if you don't bother me too much this term, because it is not necessary , for example, a full term for the winter will be planned, then i can take a more radical attitude towards the russians. well, if you bother me to preside, i have negotiate child sorry, because if i don't negotiate with the russians and take these steps of my own and you don't help me, that means i'm endangering the national interests of israel this is such a complicated party, it will immediately begin to play out after no one has been formulated there we will

now see who who will be the minister of foreign affairs, who will be the minister of defense. they will definitely want to show that they are more effective than the previous ones. there is no need to govern. it is very important to show that in general, everything that happened this year was some kind of misunderstanding. now there is understanding, it will be effective and no, it is not by chance that he said that he will consider the issue of the supply of weapons to ukraine, he may not say yes, but he will consider it, this military-political cabinet of the israeli government will meet, they will talk about it, there will be different arguments, we this we will not hear israel is a country of deep secrecy but that they will consult that they will at least demonstrate the discussion process that how can it be said just like that no no it must be an expert serious in the prime minister's throat he should see all the files. he should come out

to the president of ukraine with these positions, also in a completely discrete conversation, and explain. so, so, and so, and here i say again that this is not an increase, you know, it is not an increase by one person of the group of those who help ukraine from the point of view of how is it done, the americans, the europeans, this is an increase of the camp itself, the iraqis, or will it be another such politician, and on the other hand, i think maybe we need such politicians, did you see the prime minister of israel, natalie bennett, in the first weeks, they went to putin, this the mission did not end, but i think that if i were in ben's place and not tanyaku, we could get some kind of result, a correct understanding of putin's real wishes, no, no, he would not allow himself to go just like that, yes. at the end of this topic, it is interesting that you mentioned that garbage, well, they still support ukraine, and this affects the politicians accordingly, because it is their electorate. and how

can ukraine activate the ukrainian issue inside israel so that, let's say, this support grew and the equivalent was weapons. also, i nevertheless, i still think that this is the least cynical of the ps issues - cooperation with public opinion has ended, it was important before the elections and it was important then when the government was trying to understand which position is better for the electorate. now we are dealing with a person who does not pay much attention to public opinion that reads newspapers only to make sure that journalists have again written something bad about the prime minister's wife and that they can still treat other people's opinions with deep respect, as far as i know by a glance, it is very similar here, and i would say that this is a family tradition, that's how they have such a family, and you have to influence the prime minister, this is

work at a high level with a person, why not, well , the president is talking to the president of turkey, i would have president zelensky well, because he achieves a lot in these conversations, we can see, well , the restoration of the grain agreement is a result, well, this means that it is not. the question is how many articles will appear in the turkish press and how many journalists can be imprisoned after that, well, he is able we know a lot, but the question is how the dialogue of the presidents takes place, and at such and such a level of defense, they are all serious people, and that is exactly what it is. that is the essence, not public opinion and not the statements of ambassadors, you see, our ambassador in germany really changed public opinion because german politicians, the president, have pants, the federal chancellor schulz, the leader of the hds faction, mertz, they read from the newspaper in the morning and take into account how these newspapers or

online publications will influence the population, they work differently, they work so as to present you know yourself as a person with faith in some democratic principles on which was created by the state of israel, it always seemed that it was such a chaotic democracy, i was even surprised at the level of this democratic chaos that was always observed in israel, it was similar to ukraine. by the way, you are a certain peace, but now it is not like that there are huge chances that the president of ukraine, if properly built, will build a dialogue with the prime minister of israel, will act in the role

of his grandson, as with president biden, listen to the prime minister of israel, understand the problems of the prime minister of israel, who is the prime minister of israel has such a relationship with putin that he can achieve concrete results not only from the point of view of supplying weapons, but namely from entering into some such agreements and decisions that may not even be visible now, but may arise in as a result of such a dialogue, because i believe in the political skills of the mech, i cannot identify myself as one of his supporters. if i were a citizen of israel, i would replace anyone, i would never vote in my life. i am also clearly aware of this, but that does not mean that we cannot give a tribute to the political abilities of a specific person who we don't even like him professional we may not like president trump, conditionally speaking there but he clearly understood what would happen as a result of the construction of the northern streams himself i understood, and i needed advisers for this. he had a completely justified, clear and correct

position of a great businessman who understood that when you create a monopoly, you then become dependent on this monopoly, on these views of president trump. understand well now we see that president trump in this part of his position was listened to one thing and go back. i suggest to mr. vitaly to touch on the topic of iran and saudi arabia for the last time, because there is a possibility of a full-scale war there. please tell me why you think two warring states constantly have claims against each other in their tradition, in particular, the struggle for leadership in the persian gulf. why can they start a full-scale war right now, at least it looks like

saudi arabia and iran are doomed to rivalry until saudi arabia is sunni and the operation and the rank of the shiite church are two such steocracies cannot live normally in one world . i think that when there will be a democratic rank, one way or another, i do not think that it will have such a complicated relationship with saudi arabia as with the theocratic council, but now you just have to understand that the iranian hayatol simply keeps the ground under their feet huge internal political problems, the level of insurrection that we are currently seeing in iran, the fact that people are dying by the hundreds, this is something that has not been observed in iran since the events of 1979, and the regime can think how to get it, and in order to maintain the regime, this a classic of foreign policy, firstly, the result of containment, and secondly, this is the possibility of additional tightening of the nuts. well, in principle, you see that

putin used the war in ukraine for russia itself much more efe than for ukraine. well, yes, in ukraine, part of the territory is occupied, but in russia itself, even during these months, there were such disturbances that were called well, they have all been living in a totalitarian country for a long time. it is not that there was territorialism, but now this is what they wanted from the first day, and it must be said that they simply they ingeniously used the fact that they simply uproot everything when people began to be arrested for keeping such a clean sheet of paper on the pickets. yes , this is inadequate, well, in general, this is a sign of total totalitarianism . the question is not what you write . the question is that you can even write the act itself. the very thought is punished is punished this is a direct road to a totalitarian state, but such a state can be rebuilt only in times of war if in tehran they decided that the environment is a disaster for me or president ibrahim raisi, what is there to save now

the state needs totalitarianism, it is not so easy to introduce it with decrees, we need to start a war, we need people to start dying in large numbers, and then against this background, when society is consolidated, because the war is with uh, what does it mean that some missiles can fall on tehran? well, then we will declare everyone who is against us enemies of the people as enemies of iran, you want us to lose the war, you want the saudis to come here and close our honor, you want that. well, you can ask a lot of things. this is what the russians are doing right now kolya basque television smears tears and tells that we are all being erased with an eraser well, in order not to erase with a sponge, everyone who considers putin baskov and medvedev an idiot of art with an eraser is correct this is the iranian approach so it is absolutely logical i think that if you succeed in suppressing the protests, they will not start a war. but

will they succeed in suppressing these protests? the coming weeks for iran and then there may be any twists and turns, these are messages like this. they just do n't appear like that, mr. vitaly, thank you very much for, as always, your expert, professional answers to the most interesting topics, i think we haven't mentioned the topic of scholz yet -he who visited the sittings of the party- it was discussed with our a speaker, but i will ask you then, finally, we are about the appeals, what is it? she has already talked, and it is interesting that the countries of the western world and even within germany will be opposed to schulz's visit to the prc, well, it will always be like this now because the question always arises when you go to china in such a situation, you should not legitimize it