here, what kind of person are you even moving forward? but if you deny the rise and all the happy people have died, and then all the happy people have left. and there is only a herd left that can be packed and they will put a machete in it because it is visible that much less people are needed to service the pipe. and you in general , it’s simple and nobody conquers russia, there are no such fools, and that’s why they sit with complete impunity and do what they want, and it’s simple. sometimes it’s difficult in the west to imagine how this regime is not able to perceive individuals, individuals, individuals, how meaningless are you, eh , in that, that is, eh, as if in this universal value in which the kremlin lives. and so i don't know what is possible for them, as if yes, i think that they feel quite safe, they feel themselves it's completely safe because it takes 22 years, it's already two years, it's not bad, so it's necessary

for our people of russia to prove that we're wrong to leave the relationship thank you, yuri rashkin, a political and public figure in the united states, we were in touch thank you, sir i will try to answer yuri questions that we already have. so nataliya knysh. do you think that putin will one day be ready to capitulate or make an act of goodwill and withdraw his troops or be bent to the last until his entire army is destroyed or his own people poison him? i think that vladimir putin may be ready for the so-called act of goodwill, that is, in a situation where he saw that the russian troops could not gain certain positions, he would of course be ready for their

withdrawal, as has already happened several times in the north of ukraine and in the kharkiv region, it could be on in many directions, without knowing, this could be the case with crimea, but wherever there are russian troops from the point of view of non-strategic, one-time goals , they can withdraw there even without major battles. i don’t know if it can be with a new tile because it is the water supply of crimea. i don’t i know if it could be the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, they took it and left it where it is not so strategically important, they can leave it, will putin be ready to surrender, i don’t see any reason to believe that he even thinks about it for a moment, why should he surrender he is the president of a nuclear state, he continues to sell his energy carriers, his budget has huge revenues, he has now started to create a

virtually private army, what we are now seeing with these representations of the wagner pvk in the regions says that he is not close to the russian army and the fsb, which completely controls the country is creating another private army, possibly for the alleged suppression of protests. in russia itself, will it poison its own? i don't see any reason because it is essentially a czech system. the federal security service of russia is a system-forming body in russia federation putin is a representative of this organization, from changing him to patrushev or bortnikov, i do not think that this is necessary for those people who rule russia today, so that putin can expect that he will lead the russian federation for many years, if the russian army is broken, it is possible there well, they can break it up, i already said about it, well, it will move to the borders of ukraine, well, they are mobilizing new

people, they will teach them. we do not allow the possibility that the ukrainian army will go there to moscow , the question is not even that russia can apply nuclear weapons against ukraine in the event that ukraine starts operating on its territory. i believe that the issue of nuclear weapons is not at all a question of where the ukrainian army will operate, it is only a question of how ready vladimir putin will be to use nuclear weapons. on the territory of russia, it is only his decision and only his understanding of what the west will answer, but simply from the point of view of human resources, you understand that there are still difficult times ahead of the struggle for these territories that are occupied by russia, yes, not for the territories of russia itself so, in principle, i think that there are no objective reasons for putin's capitulation, there are no objective reasons for putin to lose power in russia

, there are none. not that something will change in russia, that putin is capitulating. we have a recipe for victory, the liberation of our territories, we would like everyone to restore our territorial integrity from the point of view of international law, the entry of donations, everything else - this is a chain of transformation into such a lebanese-type country is also possible. well, you know, when president siri kafe zazad destabilized lebanon so much and also lost. he was there with israel and such other supporters could also think that he would capitulate sooner or later, when he did not capitulate and died, handing over power to his son. there is instability in syria now civil war, russian , iranian troops, did it become easier for

lebanon? of the russian regime, the russian regime can exist for a long time, let's not be like the people who in 1917 believed that the bolshevik regime would fall in a few months, bolshevism was already laid. i would say the anatomy of its collapse, but many people did not wait for this collapse because this collapse stretched for 80 years people simply died not even in the camps and from repressions, but simply the time of their physical life ended and they did not wait for its collapse. territorial integrity, a guarantee of security with putin's russia, we can coexist for many years and decades. and by the way, this idea that putin will definitely fall if he loses the war seems to me to be

completely detached from reality. sadim hussein lost the war early, and where did he go to rule until the americans came down? in baghdad and the egyptian presidents were losing wars to israel, one real loser and admitted it and the whole nation asked him to stay another program announced the defeat of victory and no one doubts in egypt that this is a victory the very idea that the regime must fall when it loses is not very realistic for that society. it must realize this loss and how it can react to it. the united states asked ukraine to show readiness for negotiations against the background of the upcoming us elections, such a question can mean language and diplomacy of the surrender of ukraine, because

everyone needs a war before the elections. close this is the beginning of the surrender of ukraine's interests, firstly, midterm elections in the united states on tuesday, and no one has ended the war in ukraine by this time, then there will be the 2020 presidential election is correct, it is still quite a long period before the next presidential election in the united states. and by the way, i think it is in the interests of ukrainians that the war should not end by then, because as i said once again, this is a long-term conflict of the syrian type and the 20s not at all a topic for ending this conflict. if we are not members, we can talk about 30-40 sentences, but we can stop the hot phase of the conflict. i think that we should be more interested in this than the americans. so it is not the issue of the surrender of the interests of ukraine in the united states realizes that what should have happened and what we talked about for a long time is beginning to happen in that a large number of people from the help of ukraine and not understanding why it is not possible in principle

to consolidate on which positions and stop the war when the people themselves gentiles, believe me that huge numbers of people absolutely do not matter how much territory there is in ukraine, because it will remain, even more so when it comes to some small countries that see that ukraine is still a big state. it means that they are suffering, so that ukraine would return there, there would be a few more regions, so they may have a leader who does not want negotiations, and the united states says this country , let's do this, sir, let's say what you want, victory, because the russians will still not go to any real negotiations and you will show your constructiveness. so this is not a surrender of ukraine's interests, a stabilized world is just what you need to understand, the civilized world is interested in the victory of ukraine in the restoration of international law, but the price for this victory will be paid by ukraine itself in human terms resources and economic resources, the civilized world is absolutely not opposed to this, so that after that ukraine will be restored for decades, but with

complete territorial integrity and the civilized world will help this, but the ukrainians themselves will live in this depopulated, deindustrialized country, decades of industrial construction, demining, social problem areas in energy, medicine all this will have to be experienced by a new generation, and generations of ukrainians , and ukrainians should adjust to such a life already today the war is only a prelude to such a life, everything that will begin after the war, you know, your hand is amputated and you live with a prosthesis, but until the operation, she does not even understand what is happening, everything that you will see, and in this regard, we will be interested in the conflict ending as soon as possible, this is about by the way, we talk all the time with the president of ukraine about a different ukrainian policy because they understand that everyone who really sees the numbers of future tests and those who are going to stay here will not be like that, there will be many people like us

it seems that they understand this scale. do you think that the world will continue to be fascinated by russian culture after it became clear what kind of non-humans this culture has educated? i do not think that your culture educates anyone, some non-humans in the tunnel, russian culture undoubtedly has such the very right to be in the world as the culture of any other people who played their role in history, different romans cut out peoples in whole bundles, not even a drop remained of these peoples but we still read roman poets about the german role in the history of the second world war wars were written by brutes, millions of people were destroyed in constitutional torture camps,

i will not even list them, but this did not affect the attitude of the world to goethe, schiller , bach, beethoven, and even more so, even these cultural figures who supported the hitler regime and worked in germany in germany in the 30s the 40s remain in demand, their plays are staged, their books are published, haufmann, who sat in a bed alone with gegering, one of the respected playwrights of this world, jünger, who was closely acquainted with hitler shared by goebbels gives national socialism one of the most popular writers in europe published under all possible conditions chekhov

did not sit in the same bed with putin tolstoy was not familiar with putin and the bears i believe that such ideas to remove evil from culture when there is not enough strength to defeat the regime is unproductive, the more i remind the whole ukrainians have been with the russians for all 100 years of their history on one side of the barricade of evil. so when you read about the crimes of the soviet army during the second world war on the territory of those countries because which she went through, remember that it was not the army, only russia. if you cancel my ukrainian culture, taking into account all this, no, i think that all this attitude towards russian culture is because many of our compatriots

do not have their own german culture after the war. i am confident that an adequate attitude will be formed for russian culture and that there is significance, they will stop hypertrophying , this is a very important moment, it is obvious that the part of russian culture that is a world heritage is great. ukraine or from any other country, don't even doubt it, but it is obvious that the peripheral part of russian culture, which has always been imposed on us as our own and how very important it is, will disappear from our cultural record, and the easiest way to stop considering this culture as our own is to switch to the ukrainian language because the very idea that i will speak the russian language and have nothing to do with russian culture is, i'm sorry, schizophrenic, human language encourages a certain consumption of cultural values ​​of any level in

for some it is tik tok for some it is classical literature. if you want to be outside of the russian world, speak ukrainian, expect ukrainian literature. if you want to read russian writers, read them in ukrainian translations and you will understand how interesting it is. to admire the greatest assets of russian culture as he today admires the greatest assets of german culture as he admires spanish writers who wrote during the time of the inquisition this is how europe looks in every nation your bucket of blood is not the last scaffold on which europe descends in the 21st century. will there be more trials, but the train to russia is assumed to be a

weapon that can be used in the war against ukraine, in your opinion, can help from the dprk improve the enemy's position on at the front, i am not a military expert, i do not know how many weapons from north korea can supply the russian federation. taking into account the fact that there is currently no human potential, it is true that untrained people work in the russian regiment it is obvious that this is not a matter of shells, but in any case it is clear that russia will look for weapons wherever possible. vladimir putin is serious about a war to destroy ukraine, he is absolutely sure that he will win this war, he believes that in a certain time ukraine will disappear from the political scene maps of the world and he will do everything that depends on him to make it happen, he simply has not many allies left, fortunately for us, if he buys weapons from iran and north korea , it means that he has big problems with taking into account the situation at the front and external factors, what is the optimistic optimal and

pessimistic scenario for ukraine i have always said that it is not a matter of scenarios, it is a matter of possibilities, an optimistic scenario is the restoration of our territorial integrity in full and joining nato is an optimistic scenario he has units for the restoration of territorial integrity without joining to nato the impossibility of fully restoring territorial integrity and joining nato the impossibility of restoring territorial integrity and not joining nato from each of these scenarios its own fork in the new conflict after russia gathers new forces. so, there are no other scenarios in principle. can russia now fully establish control over the territory of ukraine

? does it not have such forces? can russia contribute to the fact that, as we, a larger number of people left it? ukraine can do it, it will work on it, destroy the ukrainian infrastructure, you just need to understand the simple thing, that was the goal of february 24, 2022 , the occupation of ukraine, the creation of a puppet government, the joining of ukraine to the union of russia, ukraine and in belarus, it was based on the simple fact that 73% of the voters who voted for volodymyr putin for volodymyr zelenskyi are the voters of volodymyr putin and are the party of surrender. in this election, there were people who voted for pro-russian candidates in the presidential elections, but they were in a complete minority during the first round and during the second round elections, russia was not aware of this. putin was not aware of this. now this awareness has happened. what does this mean? what is the conclusion from this

awareness? it means that it is necessary not only to conquer ukraine, but also to expel its population. it is no longer necessary. it means that it must be destroyed, expelled , intimidated. only those who will be able to stay in ukraine will be able to stay. to recognize ourselves as russians, you see that putin is occupying regions that are ukrainian donetsk needs the territory of the population of the loyal population to be destroyed or expelled so that in this regard i i don't see any problems for russia to think in this way. but at the same time, it cannot, that is, ukraine cannot be conquered . people, this is a plan plus hunger, an attempt to inspire it after all, plus

frozen europe, raising tariffs in the winter, that is, putin to a huge number of plans, the launch of ballistic missiles by the dprk, iran's threats to the soviets russian aggression and nuclear blackmail, or at the same time, the events show that the vizla have already formed in opposition to the civilized world, agree and coordinate their actions, which attitude to the three autocrats of the dictatorships is failing today in politicians and expert circles as a set of democratic regimes or the design of an alternative that agrees on its actions well, that's what the germans told the poles, it's a struggle between democracy and dictators, everyone understands this very well, and as it often happens during wars , very often they also stand on the side of democracy a dictator, and this is already a sign of degeneration for the future. the soviet union was on the side of democracy during the second world war, we are reaping the fruits of this to this day, the fact that democracy won in the union with the dictatorship, in principle, condemns

humanity to the kraz now, 8 decades after the second world war, we are thresholds have disappeared from humanity and this is a real thing that this is not such a simple situation at all the struggle between democracies and dictatorships continues for several decades in a row and will be quite serious democracies must win but the dictatorship will do everything possible to destroy the democratic world. comment on how realistic the full activation of the capital is, how probable a second attack on kyiv is. i don't see military experts now who believed that belarus has enough forces for a second attack on kyiv, the second location of the capital is a question of to what extent the capital will be able to preserve its infrastructure at the time of winter, because we don't know now, obviously the situation when you repeat it when in the classroom of kyiv does not look real

but vladimir putin is preparing for repeated shkiryak steps to destroy the ukrainian structure who knows if you will make it, you just need to understand that like war there are no forecasts because you want me to start from today's forecast and in the morning we will wake up and there will be news that will make everyone's hair stand on end it may be. it may be necessary to prepare for war. it is necessary to prepare for bad news and perceive it as a range. i very sincerely advise everyone to do this. it is a good tactic and i hope they don't happen. i don't have any. forecasts. i don't know about the evacuation. it will depend on how well ukraine's energy system will withstand further testing. and whether it will continue to be destroyed by the enemy. how effective the air defense system will be. so here all the questions are like that, and i think that i have never been to iran in my life, it's not it is not about me, for sure, since mykola

september, the question of the revolution, islamic perversion, etc., became probable because, in fact, iranian society was completely anachronistic in the province and it did not perceive any changes the changes were essentially carried out by the dictatorial regime of the power the power of the power we you understand very well that in such a situation it is difficult to achieve anything because this was used by the most conservative forces of society that created an authoritarian dictatorship what kind of country will iran become in the event of a regime collapse we do not know because it is a collapse so far is not visible so quickly, but let's hope that the collapse of the yetal regime will happen, but what will the rank look like after that, this question is also what they said. so, after the arab spring, the arab countries will become democratic and secular and in general so what and what

it happened so that what is the phenomenon of the popularity of taras shevchenko, his portraits were in every peasant house, they believed that he would help to give an independent country, and it is unlikely that they had such a need or even a desire for whether history was freed from serfdom, making him a hero of millions, no phenomenon popularity of taras shevchenko in that taras shevchenko was the first i said to the first person, this is not even a question of the writer who spoke to the ukrainian people in his own language, not of the philological meaning of this word, even though philological as well. and there is always someone who talks to the people who talks to the people , as this people perceives

itself. non-linguistic, namely, the national internal, such as the everyday, customary , family feeling, and shevchenko played exactly such a role, but this is the founding nation without shevchenko, it would hardly be possible for the ukrainian people to exist as such as we know him and i do not think that the peasants gave themselves in this report, you are right , first of all, this is the idea of ​​every peasant house, he was not only peasant ukrainians, that you need to understand the nutrition of donkeys , there were almost no statistics of ukrainians in the cities, but these statistics were a large number of people who were called russians, but they were ukrainians, they were ukrainian-speaking they knew the ukrainian language for not a large area, let's say

there, the russian peasant poet mykhailo koltsov published a collection of poems in the ukrainian language it was a language of the ukrainian population of modern voronin and in this large space, people read shevchenko not only in the villages, so that people simply read these texts and they saw in them what they felt corresponded to their self-image from their historical self-image precisely because such a cry of a slave on the people prone to uprisings of haydamak and the everyday idea of ​​oneself, if you mention kateryna, it all happened at a time when, in principle, nations were being born in europe, by and large, ukrainians made it to this train although in one of his last carriages and it was not a

luxury or even a first-class ticket. this world precisely because there was no political world, these nations that could use political factors were historical, they used them there, it was not about writers, about political parties, about travel declarations, ukrainians could only use them i used the philology of poetry because even their history was essentially taken over by the great russians and reworked by the future russians of the russian

empire. there was no place left for ukrainians in their own history, and therefore they had to appeal not to history, but to the word, to the language, to literature. that is why the ukrainian language is so huge. religion, the catholic religion of ukrainians , became a factor of national identification among the irish, who were almost english-speaking at the time of the beginning of their struggle against the british occupation. there could not be a factor because their church was privatized by the russian church, they came to their ukrainian church, but it was the church of the moscow patriarchate and that is why shevchenko remained and people could simply accept it without realizing who was thinking about them, who would care about them, who wanted them to be

proud that they did not forget that they could not only plow but also rebel when we were cossacks, they were at the time of shevchenko's life, the empire wanted to definitely turn ukrainians into a peasant nation, orats into serfs, and that more they didn't play any role. they just engaged in agriculture and danced gopaka oh how delicious you have kitchen gogol donuts that jump right into the mouth this is all russian discus gogol because in the guide, defender and builder of this imperial discourse is generally anti-ukrainian shevchenko was the guide of the ukrainian discus that's

why portraits gogol could only be in the schools of empires, and portraits of shevchenko, as it is correctly said, in every house, two ukrainians and two elections, this has always been the case in the history of the ukrainian people, but on i will stop there, ani has a word in melnyk, who will now present you with a news release at this hour . i say goodbye to you, friends, until the next meetings . thank you for the most important thing. in a few moments, in particular, i will tell you about the fact that the russians fired 72 shells in sumy oblast, which is why some trains are delayed. continue more be with us