club and donald trump won, well, there really is no such thing, i completely agree with you, mr. yevhen, at the event , they increasingly began to talk about the possibility of concluding negotiations between ukraine and russia and even about the possibility of concluding a peace treaty between ukraine and russia, for example, the washington post and i am now asking the director that he showed us this graphic with the washington post writes that washington behind the scenes is even convincing kyiv to participate in these negotiations with russia, that is, yevhen, i have a question for you. the west really wants peace and is ready to achieve it by any means. at the price or is it possible, after all, referring to your sources, the washington post is still the washington post, you know, after more than 250 days of a large-scale russian invasion, we have

to understand one thing in order to write, let america and russia be silent when i speak to you, i.e., be silent, washington post news -york times, note that the american newspapers give in the background mr. not british, not french, not german, that is, i see here, on the one hand, the provocative influence of russia . and they have these technologies. unfortunately, they have been developed for a long time on the other hand, i believe that the west is not so much interested in achieving such a scenario of the development of events, i will explain why the west literally in the first weeks after the large-scale invasion became convinced that ukraine is not afghanistan and there will not be such a

situation that the army is developing and numerous military assets will simply go to the taliban, well, in this case, the russians. yes, there are certain restrictions on the transfer of aircraft. in february, ukraine did not have any documents at all regarding the provision of military-technical assistance, it’s true. despite this, we initially received it as a promise, now we will receive the already mentioned high-marf, we will receive the same kamikaze drones. well, we will receive a lot . that they build their own policy in this way, and this is their right, but in any case, i am sure that at

the moment we have no reason to believe that, that is, that the west is surrendering ukraine, no one knows us it will seem that if we ourselves do not want it, the ukrainians have already convincingly proved and, excuse me, thousands of lives have proved that they will defend their state, and in this process, ukraine is now playing in the interests of the west, because it is carrying out the mythologizing of russia, the west is gradually stopping, and it is not possible as quickly as we would like. but behaving like a rabbit with a premonition in front of the kremlin, you understand, some things that politicians say publicly are beginning, not only there are politicians with a component of eccentricity, as boris johnson does, but look at the evolution of olaf solts what he spoke until february 24. and what he is saying now

, and joseph biden himself periodically also likes to give such sharp verbal assessments, so the west, due to his political nature, he can not help but offer negotiations, well, then it will not be a west. well, then it will be an undemocratic society. good let's talk more about the negotiations, but now on the part of russia, the desire of russia, see lately, more and more often, you can hear statements from the side of moscow and the kremlin that they have always been ready for negotiations. and that's all ukraine, that's all zelenskyi and his government, they all crossed out everything, they passed a law prohibiting negotiations, well, in a word, ukraine is bad. the kremlin is white and fluffy. evgeny. please tell me , right now, right now. at this stage, negotiations

are necessary for russia. no, negotiations are not necessary now. if it were not difficult for our defenders because russia will insist on negotiations to preserve the status quo and to preserve the territories it seized, but i literally read today that ukraine has already liberated 50% of the territory that was seized from february 24, and this is a third of the territory that has been captured by russia since the 14th year, that is, russia is aware that its problems are increasing. look at the monolithic information field that exists in the reef, the problems of their mobilized are still breaking through, different, completely different, somewhere, the shooting of

soldiers due to disrespect for islam, somewhere a riot because they didn't pay the money, somewhere they are telling general ana , let's get out of here, i'll soften the words, the truth is, and this is the symptoms, you know it's like when a person has measles or chicken pox, the rash on his skin is symptoms that she is sick, and these are symptoms of the fact that the russian state is sick, that simply forcing 300,000 or more people into military uniform is not enough to create the conditions for further success, it is not enough to dress them and give them rusty kalashnikovs, if the trend continues, then russian

they will mobilize their officers as in the 17th year to raise bayonets, we can already see it, so to speak , putin already likes various historical remakes therefore already in february of the 23rd year if the trend will remain, there are great chances to see the february revolution in russia, a new one for the 21st century, oh, i would really like to see it very, very much. well, if a film was ever made there, what was the name of it ? yevhen , just a second, now i'll compile the intermediate results of our voting, i think that today we asked those who watch us on youtube whether support for ukraine will change after the elections in the usa, 162 people have already voted, join more actively and 58% say that it will increase, and 31% say that will decrease well

and in its version it has 11%. well, i also want to remind you that again, those who watch their youtube or facebook, please put your favorite . well, write something, it is important for us and it is important for the promotion of the program on the network, e.e., youtube, mr. yevhen. well, let’s not talk there, but in an article from the newspapers. we will also discuss the washington post new york with you this time. let ’s talk about the daily mail. well, daily mout is like that this is the kind of publication that even calls it a british tabloid, but it’s still like that. where is the irony? now i’ll ask the director. he’s already showing it. they wrote about the fact that, according to sources, in a conversation with macron, putin talked about the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine in order to force the

ukrainian the government before capitulation, how seriously should such reports be taken by yevhen , given that the wall street journal wrote today that jake salvan, adviser to the president of the united states of america, joe biden, met did not meet a had contacts with the head of the russian security council patrushev and putin's adviser on international affairs yuri ushakov p yevhen we need to take such messages seriously we need to take all messages seriously but you and i live in such a world to some extent it is true and accordingly we see what is happening, well, such changes in approaches. i would say that if we had read the news in march about jake

sullivan talking to the russians with patruska and ushakov about not using nuclear weapons, then we they thought yes. look, the americans believe us , it’s true. and when we read in our light the events that have already taken place, that’s why we say, oh, you’re thinking. yes, he is doing something behind our backs. i will say things like this, you understand, it is normal for the americans to conduct such negotiations about the non-use of nuclear weapons, because the use of nuclear weapons is absolutely taboo for the americans, and accordingly, they act against russia in

such a way, you can not like jake sullivan recently, but he performs his tasks as a representative of the administration of the united states and not as a citizen of ukraine who was sent there, you know, this reminds me of the situation when everyone started talking about what will happen in this well, next year there will be elections for the secretary general of nato, and among the candidates is khrystyna frint and we in ukraine perceive her as well, of course, who else but a person with ukrainian roots can claim to become the secretary general of nato, moreover, the people who talk about it are completely serious they forget the fact that nato is usually headed by

representatives of small states. and the frillin represents canada, which is a member of the assessment, you understand, well, we should not adapt our aspirations to the task of the taskmaster, you know, to adapt the task to the condition written at the end, it is wrong for us to do so we shouldn't and we won't of course we won't, but here's another question for me about this, because of what is osi, well , at least they can be these contacts of jake salliv with patroshev and ushakov because of the possibility of russia's use of nuclear weapons is it or is it not a signal that the united states of america has some possible intelligence information that russia does plan to use it, well, the russians are talking about it

themselves. they hinted here, we will now find that you were preparing to use a dirty bomb here in your precinct. well, this is a known fact. it sounded like in march, i'm just saying that we live in such a busy to the information flow that people simply forget about it. you understand, it just falls off the agenda, but the theses that sound from various western politicians, i emphasize different ones from stoltenberg and from schwalbe and from blinkin, well, that too and i can remember in the last week they talk about one thing if russia will use a nuclear bomb to cross red lines and it will simply cease to be

a completely civilized state. the logic of the action of the west well, of course, let's give one last question about russia and nuclear rhetoric, then we'll move on a little to another topic. well, as another topic, it is again related to russia, but at least not about nuclear weapons. look, there is information that the american submarine - an island with nuclear warheads on board went into the mediterranean sea. well, somewhere it is now floating there in the mediterranean sea. here it is. hmm. this is how the united states of america is trying to warn putin again. i understood correctly, but look, i still continued his question, they always say the west. i mean that in the event that putin uses nuclear weapons against ukraine, the response of the united states of america and nato will be different with the help of conventional weapons, then

look at this submarine in the mediterranean sea, what is it now can be a function, you know , first of all, as a submarine sailor, i will say that a submarine can only walk, it does not float , this is for sure, this is for sure. and secondly, i note that this is a logic that should be understood by the united states from the times of confrontation during the cold war, not to the united states, but to russia, russia also acts in a different way, which is often very much, well, in fact, a remake of what happened until recently

. they talk about the logic of the cold war by clearly showing a nuclear submarine that carries a sufficient number of intercontinental ballistic missiles, probably with nuclear warheads. we will move away from the nuclear topic a little bit from the topic of nuclear weapons and these threats, but we will still talk about ukraine, look at this week, well, in fact, last week already at the end of last week, a radical change in the rhetoric of the government of the islamic republic of iran, if until now they denied any - what information about the fact that they supply their drones to russia, at the end of last week the minister of foreign

affairs of ukraine admitted that they birds supplied drones to russia well, but he did such a small thing clarification that we did this even before the beginning of the full-scale invasion of russia into ukraine on february 24 of this year, although the united states of america said today that well, don't talk nonsense in iran, they supplied even in the summer these drones and they supplied them to crimea also in the russian city of astrakhan, but less so, mr. evgeny, i have a question for you, such a change in rhetoric on the part of tehran. what can this indicate that it is being pressured? i do not think that the guarantor is being pressured. i think that tehran is creating opportunities for itself. certain military-political and diplomatic maneuvers, because last week there was also information that tehran was ready to help saudi arabia and a red

flag was raised over one of the leading mosques, and the flag of revenge was raised. as winnie-the-pooh said, zhuzhu should not be it's just the truth and we must not forget that the islamic republic of iran is, well, it is primarily shiites, and the majority of muslims are primarily sunnis, and the competition in this context can sometimes be even stronger than that of muslims, jews, well, it is in the context various middle eastern confrontations, i don't believe tehran's official position, i'll explain why, remember how they destroyed ukrainian passenger liners in january 20, and what happened after that, and we didn't do it, and it's not up to us, and

it's not our competence, and we won't apologize and many other things, that's why i think that they have no faith and in this sense there can be no doubts and no well, i would say on a very large scale until iran stops and does not publicly declare that it stops supplying arms to russia ukraine has no confidence in him. thank you , mr. yevhen. well, thank you for your professional and comprehensive answers to my questions. it was yevhen magnat, the director of the institute of world politics. well, fortunately. although, on the other hand, unfortunately , we are late, we can add a second guest . the second one who joins my program is oleksiy haran, professor of political science of kyiv-mohylian. mr. oleksiyu,

professor. greetings. good afternoon. thank you for joining us, mr. oleksiyu. please tell me . we have very little time. please, if you evaluate the elections that are to be held in the united states of america tomorrow, the pros and cons that you see in it. okay, let's see first what i will say, but let's do our own thing regardless of the results of the elections. yes, sometimes we often focus on that a what will happen as a result of german elections, french italian elections, and so on, of course the situation for us can get worse, it can get better, but in the end we have to do our own thing and we have to build our politics in such a way that we are um so that we are understood in the west and we perceived accordingly, that is, regardless of the results of the midterm elections in the united states, we

have to transparently build our defense system and internal reforms and prove to our allies that we are a reliable ally, we prove it on the battlefield, we have to prove it with our internal transformations, now the second moment listen to the american flights the solar system is built in this way the constitutional system is very rarely situations when one party controls the office of the president and both chambers of the american congress. i am not talking about the fact that there are governors and there are houses of states. that is, these are cases, that is, the situation that was, tell me the exceptions until today, when one party, that is, the topic steals, in this case, they also control the presidency and both houses of congress, rather, it is american the president is forced to co-exist with the congress, when it is not there, he does not have a majority in at least

one chamber, so this situation is quite normal for the united states, moreover, the founding fathers of the united states conceived this system so that one party could not monopolize power, now what from this in relation to these midterm elections, it looks like the republicans are getting a small majority in the house of representatives, the situation in the senate is 50 , it remains 50 to 50, there is a little more chance that the republicans may have a few more mandates , but the democrats until things will win the majority of elections of state governors in 440 states and territories, the governor is elected, the governor is re-elected , and there the majority will be held by the democrats, so what does this really mean for ukraine we see that both among the republicans and among the left-wing

democrats there are reservations about the continuation of large-scale aid to ukraine or statements about the need for more control. well, more control is normal for us, yes, a decrease in aid is definitely worse, but we have to understand that we have there is bipartisan support and voting in the american congress in both houses does not follow clear party lines, this is very important to understand clearly, that is, far from all republicans, let's say, will vote against of biden's proposals, so if the republicans get a majority in one of the houses, yes, the situation will be a bit more difficult, but we don't need to sprinkle ashes on our heads, we have to do our own thing and we need to work with both teeth and teeth once again, even

if some republicans are more skeptical about providing assistance in ukraine, there is still a significant part of re dances that are ready to continue this assistance. therefore, it is necessary to work with both chambers and clarify with a separate new e-e member of the congress, a congressman and a senator and the importance of continuing the assistance of ukraine once again we will not sprinkle our heads with ashes, we are waiting for the results , they will be tomorrow and we will continue to work, but still, some kind of change can be in your opinion yes , support for ukraine look again, we saw it, give it up yes, tomorrow we will see the result for the first time we will see the final results, because let's say here, every mandate must be counted, the american system is majoritarian, it is not proportional, so when you are shown these results , there are percentages.

democrats, it means nothing, every mandate is important. so, first of all, tomorrow we will find out the final results, and secondly, we will find out who exactly will be present from among the candidates from the republican party, because some of them are outright trumpists who question even the results of the presidential elections e- those who were in the 20th year continue to put 500, and this is definitely not a good sign. ukraine, therefore, there may be certain changes, but i think that basically they will not change american support, the question will be about, let's say, the scale of this support, but once again it is uh. we continue our work, our best work is the results

at the front and the results of effective governance we will. thank you, mr. oleksiy. thank you, mr. professor. sorry for being so short. hmm , they couldn't get you involved earlier. democratic initiatives named after ilko kucherev well , at the end of the program, i will just remind you that we asked you on youtube whether support for ukraine will change after the elections in the united states of america 293 people voted 55% think it will increase 36% think it will decrease well, 9% they have their own vision of the situation, but as mr. oleksii gran, professor of the kyiv-mohyla academy, correctly said, if the elections in the united states of america were not completed, we need to do our part first of all so that our armed forces continue to press

invaders from our territory. well, the government extended diplomatic work with representatives of foreign countries. who are we on youtube? don't forget to like or dislike and comment. well , at the end of the program, i just want to remind you that we will meet soon in a week there will be new topics, but there will be new guests, but it will be as usual these in well, that's it, i say goodbye to you, my name is yuriy fizerl, see you soon , we are looking for eight-year-old margarita mityunina, who disappeared in uncontrolled ukraine territory as early as october 5, there is information that a female collaborator tried to take the girl to the occupied crimea and then, apparently, to russia, but somewhere there was a post that she was not allowed to leave because of someone else's child. and

in the end, eight-year-old margarita was left in the occupied kherson region, but it is not clear where exactly the native aunt of the missing girl told me that she left the child somewhere at the checkpoint well, yes, we were told that if she left the child at the checkpoint, she was taken by the administration of boryslav and sent to the camp well, we understand that nobody will return her, margarita's parents, we chunina, the mother lives separately in the vinnytsia region and the father in the kherson region, and it so happened that before the war the girl lived with her father in the kherson region . because that is where she studied at school during the war , the girl was studying with her father and they did not want to uproot her from her place of residence and for her to graduate school and will stay with many. his family one of their vacations, then he took them back to school, and at the beginning of the war he took them back. the war started and the mother was in the vinnytsia region. she could not

come because she had a newborn for three months so, margarita ended up in the occupied territory of the kherson region, and it was there that she met the war. she lived with her father in the boryslav district in the village of red mayak. later, she met a girl of the same age there and even befriended her, and the girl's mother turned out to be a collaborator at the beginning in october, she decided to flee to the crimea and took with her not only her child, but also margarita, when she walks about the rug, and the woman participated in the reference when our armed forces began to approach this village, she decided to flee from of this village and took her younger daughter and margarita with her, according to the locals, who apparently was going to run away to the crimea, but i know that margarita was apparently not let in. a female collaborator with her child ran away, but she left margarita behind. it is unknown where she

was at first. information that the girl got stuck at some checkpoint in nova kakhovka, and later certain details appeared and i started to contact her . us it turned out, at least in fact, that according to her words, the information about the child is that she is now in a warehouse in the administration. the woman who tried to take the eight-year-old margarita mityunina to the crimea assured that the child remained in the berislav city administration and