if you like this video on youtube, there is a button to sponsor, you can become a sponsor of our youtube channel, join our sponsors , we need your help and it is important, tomorrow at 17:10 we will have volodymyr hryshko on the air, politician-diplomat, ex-minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, we will talk about ukraine i wish everyone good health. take care of yourself and your loved ones. goodbye. congratulations, this is freedom. life. my name is vlad and lazur. we start the issue with a report from the village of shestakova in the kharkiv region. they continuously shelled the village and then occupied it as a place of deployment, they chose a farm to be followed by taras levchenko,

not only people suffer from the war. the following shots may shock you . they are only for adults. and here, look at the cows lying on top of that on the metal structures on these, well, here is the smell, the smell of death, as they say, there were 3,000

of cattle, 1,400 of them were viable. on february 28, there was a terrible air raid on i-i. well, maybe five more planes came and bombed the territory of a cow farmer, and about 2,000 cattle were killed. the last time it flew into the salons was on september 6th, that is, because of that and not it is possible to pick up no bodies, it’s okay to take them here, they say that a lot of equipment is broken. and to get here to this city in particular, well, you need to get there. well, there is a lot of large volume of work to be done while we don’t have electricity. in fact, the first reaction was a generator. it's scary for people in my arms, i was holding a person who died. well, a 21-year-old guy died when i lift him up, and on the other side, well, the wound is even worse than in the front. well

, what cows can you think about and what can you do next? and i have two small children, well, 200 m from here i was sitting in the basement on the day you are telling me about the first attack by the russians. besides your welder, your colleague in the village, someone else was killed. there was an airstrike on a farm in the neighboring village of federivka. at the time, there were 20 people here, 15 of whom were pensioners . and three are not walking i do not understand at all that it was possible to bomb there and here eh well, i think they beat on the roofs of congratulations when they entered the ldnr i am a woman and small children from 200 to relatives eh and i myself

remained cooks someone had to be fed something had to be done on we stayed tried to bypass all these fascists, and then the regular russian army came here and, uh, well , the attitude was such that we frankly, after 20 minutes, i was no longer here on the territory of the farm, tractor, give t, give, well, i can't refuse him i don't have to give it to him there was no desire at all. well, we did our best to get rid of them at the first opportunity, we left for unoccupied territory on this farm, russian units were based here at the spare parts warehouse, and here, by the way, there is no light now, but not because there is no electricity, but because

the russian military they even twisted the light bulbs and left behind such an inscription after the liberation they began to take them away because the russian troops did not stop the shelling all the time a cow flew by they died they died and now when they were released kharkiv region to the border, they decided to turn it back when we arrived, a calf was born life goes on, everything will be ukraine, it

was kharkiv well, we will remind you on the pages of radio freedom on facebook and on youtube, as well as on the air of the espresso tv channel, if you watch us on the internet, do not forget to subscribe to likes . you can also leave comments and questions in the chat under the svoboda life broadcast. jake sullivan, the us president's national security adviser, is holding private talks with vladimir putin's entourage and calls on the ukrainian leadership to publicly declare readiness for negotiations with moscow , the american media report what this means looted and abandoned, the network showed what the building of the regional administration in kherson looks like, what is happening in the city after it was appointed by the kremlin the so-called authorities left kherson 43 days in russian captivity, we hope the story of border guard

roman, who was held by russian forces in an occupied deer pen, see further us president's national security advisor jake sullivan had confidential conversations with an aide of the russian president on foreign policy, yuriy mushukov and the secretary of the security council of russia, mykola patroshev. this is reported by the lostreet journal, referring to sources among american officials, according to the media , the purpose of negotiations with russian officials was to reduce the risk of escalation in ukraine and keep communication channels open, but not to discuss the terms of the end of the war, also according to the interlocutors of the e publication, washington warned moscow against the use of nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction in the us security council the usa did not confirm or deny the information of the wall street journal. well, in addition, the information of the e-e publication, according to the information of the publication, sullivan called on the leadership of ukraine to publicly express readiness

for the search for peace. previously, similar requests from the administration of the president of the united states were reported by washington post. that the united states does not insist that ukraine really negotiate with moscow, but washington allegedly asks that kyiv publicly declare its readiness for negotiations with russia for washington - this is allegedly necessary to provide ukraine with support in countries whose citizens fear the consequences of war in their own countries . such requests were not publicly reported. neither the american side nor the ukrainian side said anything about it, and the national security adviser of the us president, jake sullivan, when he was, for example was in kyiv last friday and met with volodymyr zelenskyi, by the way, it was his first visit to kyiv since the beginning of the full-scale russian invasion of salliv on the common at the press conference with andriy yermak said that the united states will do everything possible so that the armed

forces of ukraine can continue to liberate their territories. is washington really forcing kyiv to declare its readiness for negotiations with moscow? if so , can kyiv answer? office of the president good evening well, you have already heard the question whether the representatives of the white house really asked the ukrainian authorities to declare their readiness for negotiations with moscow, let's go here very clearly, we are forming the right positions, first of all, it is impossible to force ukraine into negotiations, which do not exist , because it is very important to understand that russia does not offer any negotiations and has never offered russia, at first, officially at the negotiation sites, it offered an ultimatum and today it also insists on an ultimatum, that is, you admit that we have fixed here, we will fix these territories with ours, and then, in principle, we will stop

attacking your infrastructure, this is the first thing, and if the russian federation does not succeed, then we want so that let's sit down at the negotiating table , there will be a temporary truce, or, for example, not even a truce, but a temporary ceasefire for a couple of months . you still understand that we will present you with the same ultimatum, that is, understand that there is no negotiating position of the russian federation, it is the same ultimatum that was at the beginning of the second - ukraine receives weapons from its partners, first of all from the united states, sufficiently effectively, we where we block our territory, today we have the operational initiative, we are pushing the russian army out of our territory, and against this background, to force us into the negotiation process, and in

fact, to recognize the ultimatum of the russian federation is nonsense and no one will do it, and therefore the third is very it is important that the united states communicates absolutely equally with ukraine, there is no coercion, there is no shadow component, everything is very transparent . consolidated support for the democratic world of ukraine as such, and really communicates sincerely and transparently at all levels, including at the level, if we are already talking about psalevan at the level of political advisers, and sullivan yermak, this is very important to understand, that is, there should be no speculation, no one ukraine to an unfavorable negotiation process a rather , it does not force russia to recognize the ultimatum, it is very important to understand and finally, the last component of this is all

the talk about the fact that well, and the publications about the fact that someone is forcing the negotiations to some position there in other words, this is the information program of the russian federation, it must be understood. it can be direct, what certain pro-russian politicians in the same europe are talking about. it can be indirect. it can be used through sources . of their interlocutors in the white house, that is, the question here is either they are making things up and telling lies, or it is possible that the ukrainian authorities do not fully clarify something now, i will simply say that these publications they write about what washington is not forcing kyiv to negotiate. they write about the fact that washington is asking kyiv to publicly declare that they are supposedly ready for negotiations, that is, because volodymyr zelenskyi is something, if you look at it from a political point of view . he also signed a decree distancing himself and said

that ukraine will not hold negotiations with putin and in this way has raised the stakes quite high. let me record the official position stated by the president of ukraine zelenskyy. it is very clear, very concretely stated that ukraine is ready to the negotiation process, the positions of which are as follows: russia withdraws its troops and withdraws them to the internationally recognized borders of the russian federation. first, russia stops attacking from its territory in ukraine. this is the second negotiating position and the third negotiating position after that when we understand that russia is not on our territory. we sit down to talk with the russian government about the consequences of the war, first and second , about the post-war relations between ukraine and the russian federation, that is, ukraine has repeatedly stated publicly that negotiations are negotiations on the position, i emphasize once again another matter, and we

also recorded it, that putin, mr. putin or his entourage, they do not want negotiations, but issue an ultimatum to ukraine, which is unacceptable for us, and our partners also understand this, that is why ukraine's public position on negotiations is stated in the at the same time, it is stated that putin, who issues an ultimatum , is not a negotiator for ukraine, if you look at this story from washington, if, for example, we assume that what the american media is writing about is true, and under what circumstances for the united states it may be beneficial for ukraine to announce its readiness for negotiations, and look , it is extremely beneficial for the united states that a democratic country such as ukraine wins the war because it is a large-scale big war that fixes two things fixes two things first if ukraine loses and

russia wins then then the world must understand that international law as such does not exist, there is no arbitration, and then any country, especially with an authoritarian or totalitarian component, can attack other countries and there will be no responsibility for this. if this country wins, it is the first component, the second component, if ukraine does not win the war and this is a negotiation process on russia's terms today, that is, the ultimate fulfillment of the requirements of the russian federation, then it is clear that despite the large and powerful financial and economic advisory assistance from the nato countries and, above all, the united states, russia won you understand that then it will be proven that the russian air defense system is much better. russia really has the second army in the world. russia can dictate conditions and so on, so it is extremely beneficial for the united states to stand next to ukraine, which will win the war because this will indicate that democracy as a form of

competition, including political competition, is much more effective than any authoritarian type of state management; moreover, if ukraine wins, then it will be clear to the whole world that you cannot trample on international, and even more so, international humanitarian law, that is, you cannot use cruise missiles to force another country to sign something there or not, therefore, in my opinion, today everything is very transparent, there is just a little bit of speculation. well, it is clear that they always exist, but in the meantime, this it is clear enough that i am ukraine. and there are the principles of the negotiation process, which we just talked about. there is russia, which uses any means to get a careful operational pause. russia does not want to negotiate. ukraine, please, when russia is not yet ready for our territory of any negotiations. i recorded what you

said when russian forces leave ukrainian territory then and then ukraine is ready for some negotiations. by the way, i started our conversation by quoting foreign media literally today after afternoon, the italian newspaper, you must have read larypublic, writes that the united states and nato authorities assume that ukraine can start negotiations with russia from a position of strength after the ukrainian army liberates kherson, do you allow such a scenario? and it is very good when someone there knows something. it is very good that journalists analyze and give different scenarios, this is normal. this is analytical work, which allows us to assume how this or that event may develop, but there is an official position recorded by president zelenskyi. very clear, this is not a question of kherson or not a question of luhansk or donetsk, it is a question of the fact that on the territory of ukraine, i do not mean on the legal territory of ukraine, where yura is the territory of ukraine, and this is the entire territory, including the occupied

territories, there cannot be a pro-russian enclave, because it there will be no negotiating position, because it will only cause an additional burden on the process that follows the negotiations. that is, we have yes, we can say that when it will be released, for example, kherson or, again, lugansk, or there is a share zaporizhzhia territory will definitely be a position of strength and then definitely ukraine can say look. we offer you within 72 or 96 hours to leave the entire territory and withdraw all the armed forces. yes, there can be such a position of strength. forces must stop being on the territory of ukraine and everything and after that any negotiation process, joseph biden's adviser jake salvan was in

kyiv on friday just as it was announced at that time about 400 million help, and sally himself told you that the united states will support ukraine as much as necessary, but at the same time, the military very often emphasizes that the united states does not provide ukraine with sufficient weapons, which is necessary for the offensive. a very good question because it is fundamental, see , in principle, no one has seen such an intensity of war, well, that is, there were local conflicts much less than the intensity of the use of weapons in such quantities, including heavy weapons, rocket artillery weapons were also not used in such a volume. this is simply an incredible volume. in addition, it is another logistics , including production, that is, it must be produced, it must be delivered to ukraine and then train our guys. why because this is the third component for us in the

course of this the war is going on. let's just say that we are already completely moving away from the soviet weapons that were on the ukrainian army. we are switching to nato standards in full. therefore, this is the third process , this is the training of our military, and you know it. mathematics and this is the fourth mathematics of war, which let's say so experimentally today on the battlefield is established, look at the shelling from one side, so much should be in response or less because it is a more accurate weapon, this is a matter of dialogue. i understand what we would like. let's explain to partners, including at the level of the president's office, including, again, i emphasize at the level, if we are talking again about political advisers at the level of sullivan yoke, we are talking about what we are looking for in order to speed up where the blockade if you mathematically calculate such and such a number of such and such types of weapons in order to destroy the rear support of the russian strike group, for example

, in the southern direction, and our partners understand this, but there is a question of logistical capabilities , production capabilities, dialogue capabilities , etc., but in the meantime, you said correctly americans clearly fix the main thing, how much will be needed, we will be by your side as much, we will transfer the necessary weapons to you, yes, it is not as fast as you want, but in any case it is you will have and in this way we can properly plan the finalization of this war, there is one more topic - it will be internal and not from international politics, and i wanted to ask you about the investigation by journalists regarding the head of the dnipropetrovsk regional administration, valentin reznichenko, the journalists found out that he directed uah 1.5 billion to his girlfriend's company for the reconstruction of roads and possibly not only roads in the region, the president's office did not comment on this story, although we know that it is the

president who appoints the head of the regional administration well, it is obvious that he should bear some political responsibility for the actions of uh. come on, we have to bear any responsibility in the political sense, of course, because it is the vertical of the president, but in the meantime, it was declared a journalistic investigation based on a journalistic investigation , investigative actions are being carried out after all explanations will be received from the regional administration from the company that deals with as far as i understand there are certain documents that will be demanded as part of the criminal case after that there will be answers to the questions, after the answers to the questions, the necessary political or informational conclusions will be drawn, and then we will comment on this uh, this topic, why. because you know, it looks speculative, there is an investigation, there is already some work by investigative bodies, but there are no conclusions yet. and we already we will comment on how exactly

the president's office is, well, it's a little strange in my opinion, and why is it strange? well, wait, if we take any country, maybe in europe, we tend to compare ukraine with the countries of europe, it's a big the scandal may actually be about corruption, don't you think it's appropriate for the head of the region to suspend him from his duties for a period of time, as you yourself indicated, the investigation will proceed. time or now, any journalistic investigations, it is clear that everyone should be fired at once or suspended, etc. the view does not look strange, some questions were said, we should receive not only a journalistic investigation, but also certain materials that say, for example, there are such and such violations

of financial discipline, are there any such and such corruption, as you say, the components of corruption, and so on so far we have not received, we have only seen the president's journalists directly with reznichenko of this story, what he said, he did not comment on this topic publicly, if necessary, he will comment, but i am not preparing, there is no need. watch it a little a little again it looks strange, you are asking me whether mr. riznychenko thinks it is necessary to comment or not, this is a question for mr. riznichenko, if he thinks that this or that action was misinterpreted there, he should come out and talk about it, if he thinks it is unnecessary, he will it is enough to give documents from this, again , it is his rules. that is, his right or to go into public communication, in my opinion, it is more important to collect a package of documents and go into public and not to communicate, for example, by providing these documents, it was more effective. perhaps today

they are preparing documents on the basis of which it will be possible to express their position . of the region, he is appointed by the president, this is an appointed figure, and i just suddenly who does not know, this is not the person who was chosen , this person who was appointed, i'm sorry, i'm sorry, but you're a little bit i want us to approach professionally in any way from the authorities no, let's do it i want to be a journalistic investigation, the first point is the second point after the journalistic investigation . on the basis of it, there is a criminal case opened. there is mr. riznychenko, who has to provide evidence or not to provide evidence, it will all come to us after that, communication, you say. see. this is the presidential vertical, so probably the president has

to immediately make personnel decisions an hour after any journalistic investigation, well , that's speculation, and you shouldn't do it. and we don't we refuse, look at the vertical, there is a journalistic investigation, let's go through some logistical process, after the logistical process , the data will be provided, we will make a decision, and if there is no data, since we have an investigation, on the basis of which a criminal case is then opened, and i have nothing further, we will follow this logistical process process journalists i think the programs of the scheme will monitor one more question very briefly the mayor of the capital vitaliy klitschko said that the authorities of kyiv to various scenarios up to a possible even evacuation of people that people can leave the city if everything is turned off. is the central government preparing for such a scenario? yes, we are considering all, including the most pessimistic scenarios, but it seems to me that what should we make statements? well, there are 3 million people, and we will be surprised again tomorrow. still

choose with adults not to tell that this is some kind of special information operation or that we will be there in the spring well, i apologize for the zno or something else and he said, as with adults, you should be ready for such a thing and what is bad about that, well, it should be no yes it is definitely worth it. but if you say that you will take 3 million from the city. yes, from a large one, then we must definitely talk about logistical tasks. where will you 3 million people go? how will they go ? we will send and so on, that is, just look again, this is the same professional approach, when you say that we will definitely raise 3 million , then you need to say how logistically we will do it, where are the places where the headquarters are the evacuation headquarters or there is no headquarters, who heads it. if you want to be professional. and this looks more like a simple statement in order to

scare people a little bit, and now, regarding a specific case, definitely because i emphasize definitely, we are considering any scenario, the state exists in order to including the most pessimistic scenarios to consider yes, including if there will be a complete blackout across the country, we will definitely consider it, but first of all, the state is working to ensure that it does not happen, that there are compensatory mechanisms to carry out repairs so that it is possible not to ensure heating or water supply in any case, so that there are alternatives, because you see, transferring 3 million in winter is very, very difficult logistically, if we are ready to do it, we will be ready , but we don't need to just go out and say well, if there is a complete blackout, we will all uh, evacuate, thank you very much mykhailo podolyak, adviser to the head of the president's office, found time and joined our broadcast. thank you very much, and what do the residents

of kyiv think about a possible evacuation? shock that i could not come to the topic, well, then there were refutations, there were reassurances, and we calmed down a little. i don't have any. unfortunately, the plan is that's why i'm like this. i was very worried because, for example, i have a house , but it's built, it's not old, but new, and it 's built with electricity. who could have thought then that we'd have a war, so i have nowhere to go, we are from mariupol . we're not used to it, so what ? let's say eyes to evacuate we sat in the car and went as usual. we have been driving for six months. now we have reached the west of ukraine as a team. i think that this will not happen because the armed forces of ukraine will not allow

an evacuation from the city of kyiv if i go home under the white church. we are from kherson. for example, we will be in ukraine until the end. it doesn’t matter. kyiv will be. let’s say it was the same during the first attack and during the second. if it will remain the same, sit here until the end. if you are going to fly shells over your heads, then go to in europe, the light always defeats the darkness, we hope for the best, we heard what you think, some kind of plan has appeared. well, for now, we are thinking about where we just came from kherson recently, and that's why moving again is so stressful to drive in it to mykolaiv, closer to our hometown