drunk and what was destroyed with the help of highmarf, well, this is a beautiful advertisement of the american defense industrial complex, isn't it? i completely agree with you on this, and let there be more of these mars in ukraine, because they do their work very well here, but you already said that it has already been said that in the united states of america, in particular, in the republican party, there are now many trumpists. these are precisely the people like margery taylorgin, whose direct speech we have heard and who are more inclined to pour money into the economy. the united states of america should give less to ukraine. well, why do you think? why do you think such changes have happened to the republican party? why are there so many

trumpists there now? let's uh continue to push away from the ukrainian classics and use another phrase are the oxen roaring like a manger full of hibab uh populists and supporters of simple solutions i don't know if trump is on the uh team the office of simple solutions after the numerous statements of mikheil saakashvili about his contacts with this american politician, but the fact that simple solutions are present in his speeches is absolutely obvious, but the economy is the economic problems that are emerging and they are currently tangible and here today's moment is concentrated in the hands of the americans, the president, the house of representatives, and well, with the well- known balance in the senate, which is decided in favor of the democrats thanks to the vote of kamaligara, and

therefore the americans in the conditions of a democratic society in these midterm elections on the spot ready to change something, there is nothing strange about it, we just need to be ready for it. to be honest, there is such a readiness in ukrainian society and in the ukrainian political system, first of all . here is the carnival of hillary, hillary, only hillary wins, and then donald trump won, well, there really is no such thing, i completely agree with you, mr. yevhen, at the event, they increasingly began to talk about the possibility of concluding, well, negotiations between ukraine and russia and even about the possibility of concluding a peace treaty between ukraine and russia, for

example, the washington post, and i am now asking the director to show us this graphic with your plan . p yevhen, i have a question for you, the west really wants peace and is already ready to achieve it at any cost, or is it possible , after all, referring to its sources, the washington post still remains the washington post, you know, after more than 250 days of large-scale about the russian invasion, we need to understand one thing in order to write as it is. let america and russia be silent when i speak to you,

i.e. let them be silent. on the one hand, the provocative influence of russia, and they have these technologies. unfortunately, they have been developed for a long time on the other side. i think that the west is not so much interested in achieving such a scenario of the development of events. i will explain why the west is literally in in the first weeks after the large-scale invasion , i was convinced that ukraine is not afghanistan, and there will not be such a situation that the army will collapse and numerous military assets will simply go to the taliban, well, in this case, the russians. yes, there are certain restrictions on the transfer of aircraft. there are also questions regarding the transfer of the latest tanks, but let's

remind other, until february 24, ukraine did not have any document at all regarding the provision of military-technical assistance, true. despite this, we received at first as a promise, now we will receive the already mentioned himars, we will receive the same drones kamikaze well, we will get a lot of things. we will get some things, and the western allies ask us not to talk about them because, well, they build their own policy in this way, and this is their own right, but in any case, i am sure that we have no reason to to believe that, well, that is, that the west surrenders ukraine, no one will surrender to us if we do not want it ourselves, the ukrainians have already refused and, sorry, they have proven that they will defend their

state, and in this process, ukraine is now playing in the interests of the west, because it is mythologizing russia is gradually losing its west, not as quickly as we would like it to be. but behaving like a rabbit in front of the kremlin, you understand , some things are beginning to be said publicly by politicians, not only there, politicians with a component of eccentricity, like johnson, but look at the evolution of ol fasoltsa, what he said before 24 february and what he is saying now, and joseph biden himself periodically also likes to give such, you know , sharp verbal assessments, therefore, due to his political nature, he cannot help but offer negotiations.

then it won't be a west well then it will be an undemocratic society eh ok let's talk more about the negotiations but now on the part of eh russia russia's desire , see lately more and more often you can hear statements from the side of moscow and the kremlin that they are were always ready for negotiations and that's all ukraine, that's all zelenskyi and his government, that's all of them, they crossed everything out, they passed a law that forbids going to negotiations, well, in one word, ukraine is bad, the kremlin is white and fluffy, yevhen please tell me now right now at this stage negotiations are necessary for russia, no negotiations are needed now if it were not difficult for our defenders because russia will insist on negotiations to preserve the status quo and preserve the territories it seized, but i just read today that ukraine

has already released 50% the territories that were captured from february 24 and this is a third of the territories that were captured by russia starting from the 14th year, that is, russia is aware that its problems are increasing. look at that monolithic information field that exists in the reef, it still breaks through the problems of their mobilized, different, completely different, somewhere, the shooting of soldiers because of disrespect for islam, somewhere, a riot, because they did not pay money, somewhere, they tell general anu , come on, get out of here, i will soften the words, the truth is why, and these are the symptoms, you know it, like when a person is sick

with measles or chicken pox, then the rash on her skin is a symptom of her illness, and these are symptoms of the fact that the russian state is ill, that simply forcing 300,000 or more people into military uniform is not enough to create conditions for some further success is not enough to dress them and give them the opportunity kalashnikovs if the trend continues, the russians will mobilize their officers as in the 17th year to raise bayonets, we can see it already, so to speak , putin already likes various historical remakes therefore already in february 23 -th year, if the trend continues, there are great chances to see the february

revolution in russia, a new one already in the 21st century, oh, i would really like to see it very, very much. well, if a movie was shot there, what was the name of it there? catch up or somehow well, i really like what you said, i really expect that it will happen, yevgen , just a second, now i will summarize the interim results of our voting, i will remind you that today we asked those who watch us on youtube whether support for ukraine will change after the elections in the usa 162 people voted, join more actively and 58% say it will increase and 31% say it will decrease. well, in its version it has 11%. well, i also want to remind you that again those who look at their youtube or facebook please put own like it if you like the program don't like it if you don't like it although i'm sure of it, i 'm convinced that you should like it

well, write something, it's important for us and it's important for the promotion of the program on the network e.e. youtube, mr. yevgen well, so that they don't talk there, but in the article from the newspapers we will also discuss with you the washington post of new york this time let 's talk about the daily mail, well, the daily mout is such a publication that someone even calls a british tabloid, but it's still so. shows e-e they wrote about the fact that, according to sources, in a conversation with macron, putin talked about the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine in order to force the ukrainian government to capitulate, how seriously should such reports be treated p yevhen, considering that in the wall street journal today they wrote that jake salvan , adviser to the president of the united states of america, joe biden, met, did not meet, and had contacts

with the head of the russian soviet security service, patrushev, and putin's adviser on international affairs, yury ushakov p. evgeny, we need to take such messages seriously, we need to take all messages seriously. but you and i live in such a world, to a certain extent, clip-like truth, and accordingly we see what is happening, well, such changes in approaches. i would say that if we read the news in march about the fact that jake sullivan is talking to the russians with the patruses and ushakov about not using nuclear weapons, we thought, oh, look, the americans believe in us, it’s true, but when we read it now in the light of the events that

have already taken place, that's why we're talking about it, you're kidding. yes, he 's doing something behind our backs, it's not like that, that is, at the moment, it's happening absolutely, well, for the americans, i 'll say that, you understand, it's normal for the americans to conduct such negotiations about the non-use of nuclear weapons, that's why that the use of nuclear weapons is an absolute taboo for the americans, and accordingly they act against russia in such a way that you can't like jake salliwa, he is decorated recently, but he performs his tasks as a representative of the administration of the united states and not as a citizen of ukraine, who put it there? you know, it reminds me of the situation when

everyone started talking about what will happen in this . well, next year there will be elections for the secretary general of nato, and among the applicants is khrystyna friend, and in ukraine she is perceived as well, of course well, who else but a person with ukrainian roots can claim to become the secretary general of nato, moreover, the people who talk about it are completely serious , forgetting about the fact that nato is usually headed by representatives of small states, but freelin still represents canada, which is a member of the assessment, you understand, well, we should not adjust our aspirations to how the taskmaster knows the task of adjusting the task

to the condition written at the end, this is wrong, we should not and will not do that of course not let's go, but here's my question about this, because of the fact that there are estimates, well , at least there can be these contacts of jake sullivan with patroshev and ushakov because of the possibility of russia's use of nuclear weapons, is this a signal that the united states of america has some kind of possible intelligence information that russia does plan to use it, well, the russians are talking about it themselves. and they themselves have to discuss this topic. they are like this again. let me remind you, they talked about the dirty bomb right after the seizure of the zaporizhzhia npp and the chornobyl npp. here they were preparing to use a dirty bomb, i will pinch you here. well, this is a well-known fact. it sounded like in march, i'm just saying

that we live in such a saturated information flow. do people just forget about it? do you understand it just falls off the agenda, but theses that sound from various western politicians, i emphasize different from stoltenberg and from the sun and from blinkin, well, i can remember this too in the last week, they are talking about one thing, if russia uses a nuclear bomb, it will cross the red lines and it will simply cease to be a completely civilized state, of course we want to say if russia does this, then she will get this, they will not say this, contradict the logic of the west's actions. well, of course , let's ask one last question about russia and nuclear rhetoric, then let's move on to another topic. well, as another topic, it is again related to russia,

but at least not about nuclear weapons. look , there was information that the american submarine roth island with nuclear warheads on board entered the mediterranean sea. and somewhere he is now floating there in the mediterranean sea, here it is hmm this is how the united states of america is trying to warn putin again i got it right but look i continued my question they keep saying west i have meaning that in the event that putin uses nuclear weapons against ukraine, the response of the united states of america and nato will be different with the help of conventional weapons, then look at this submarine in the mediterranean sea, what can its function be now, you know me first of all as a submariner sailor, i will say that a submarine can only walk, it does not float. this is for sure, sorry

, unequivocally. and secondly, i note that this is a logic that should be understood by the united states from the time of the cold war confrontation with the non- united states forgive the states and russia, russia also acts in a different way, which is often very er is er actually a remake of what was happening until recently and so well, that is, it uses the logic of the cold war and the united states also act and speak in this way about the logic of the cold war, clearly showing a nuclear submarine that carries a sufficient number of intercontinental

ballistic missiles, probably with nuclear warheads. weapons and these threats, we will withdraw, but we will still talk about ukraine, look at this week, well, in fact, last week already at the end of last week, the change of rhetoric is cardinal for the government of the islamic republic of iran, if until now they have denied any information about what they are supplying at the end of last week, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine admitted that they supplied drones to russia. well, he made such a small clarification that we were doing this even before the start of the full-scale invasion of russia into ukraine 24 in february of this year, although the united states of america said today that well, don't talk

nonsense in iran, they supplied these drones even in the summer, and they supply them to the crimea and also to the russian city of astrakhan, but less so, mr. yevhen i have a question for you, such a change in rhetoric on the part of tehran. what can this indicate that it is being pressured? i do not think that you are the guarantor . about the fact that they are ready for tehran to take revenge on saudi arabia and a red flag was raised over one of the leading mosques, the flag of revenge is the same. as winnie-the-pooh said to zhuzhu, it must not be just the truth and we must not forget that the islamic

republic of iran is, well, first of all whose shiites and the majority of muslims are primarily sunnis and the competition in this context can sometimes be even stronger than that of muslims and jews, well, this is in the context of various confrontations in the middle east, i do not believe the official position of tehran, i will explain why remember how in january of the 20th year they destroyed and destroyed the ukrainian passenger liner and what happened after that and we didn't do it and it's not up to us and it's not our competence and we won't apologize and many other things that's why i think they have no faith and in this sense there can be no doubts and no well, i would say with great

regret until iran stops and publicly declares that it stops supplying russia with weapons. ukraine has no confidence in it. thank you , mr. yevhen. well, then thank you for your expertise comprehensive answers to my questions, it was evgeny magnat, director of the institute of world politics. well, fortunately, although on the other hand, unfortunately , it is too late, we can add a second guest. democratic initiatives foundation named after ilka kucheriv, mr. oleksiy , professor, i congratulate you. good afternoon. thank you for joining us, mr. oleksiy. tell me, please. we have very little time. if you evaluate the elections that are to be held in the

united states of america tomorrow, the pros and cons that you see in it. okay, let's see first what i will say. on that and what will happen as a result of german elections, french italian elections and so on, of course the situation for us can get worse, it can get better, but in the end we have to do our own thing and we have to build our politics in such a way that we are understood in the west and we were perceived accordingly , that is, regardless of the results of the mid-term elections in the united states, we have a transparent system of our defense and internal reforms and prove to our allies that we are a reliable ally, we prove it on the battlefield, we have to prove it, prove it and our internal transformations now

the second moment listen the american political system it is built in this way the constitutional system very rarely occurs when one party controls the office of the president and both houses of the american congress. i am not talking about the fact that there are governors and there are state houses. that is, these are the cases, the situation that was, tell me the exceptions until today, when one party , that is, the democrats, in this case, also controls the presidency and both houses of the congress, it is rather american the president is forced to coexist with the congress, when it is not there, he does not have a majority in at least one chamber, that's why it is like this. and this is quite normal for the united states, moreover, the founding fathers of the united states intended this system so that one party cannot monopolize power, now what about these midterm

elections looks like ah-ah that the republicans get a small majority in the house of representatives, the situation in the senate is 50, it remains 50-50 , a little more chance that the republicans may have a few more mandates, right ? but the democrats, by the way, will win the majority of state governor elections in 440 states and territories, the governor is elected, the governor is re-elected, and there will be a majority, the democrats will have a majority, so we can really see what this means for ukraine that both among the republicans and among the left-wing democrats there are reservations regarding the provision of uh-uh the continuation of large-scale aid to ukraine or uh- huh statements about the need for more control

well, more control is normal for us, yes, a decrease in aid is definitely worse, but we have to understand that in we have bipartisan support and voting in the american congress in both chambers does not follow clear party lines, this is very important to understand clearly, that is, far from all republicans, let's say, will vote against of biden's proposals, so if the republicans get a majority in one of the houses, yes, the situation will be a bit more difficult, but we don't need to sprinkle our heads with ashes, we have to do our own thing and we need to work with both a-a teeth, once again, even if part of the re ends are more skeptical about providing aid to ukraine, there is still a large part of the republicans who are ready to continue this aid. therefore, it is necessary to work with

both chambers and clarify with individual new e-e members of the congress, congressman and senator and the importance of the continuation of ukraine's assistance once again we will not sprinkle our heads with ashes, we are waiting for the results , they will be tomorrow and we will continue to work, but still, some kind of change can be in your opinion. yes , support for ukraine. look again, we saw it. let's do it tomorrow, we will see the result for the first time. we will see the final results, because let's say here, every mandate must be counted, the american system is majoritarian, it is not proportional, so when you are shown these results , there are percentages. democrats, it means nothing, every mandate is important. so, firstly, tomorrow we will find out the final results, and secondly, we will find out who exactly will be present from the candidates from the republican party, because some of them are

outright trumpists who question even the results of the presidential elections e- those who were in the 20th year continue to put 500, and this is definitely not a good sign. ukraine, therefore, there may be certain changes, yes, but i think that the basic ones will not change american support, the question will be about, let's say, the scale of this support, but once again it is uh . thank you, mr. oleksiy, thank you, mr. professor, i'm sorry that it's so short. well, they couldn't get you involved earlier, it was oleksiy haran, a professor of

political science at the academician academy, the scientific director of the democratic initiatives foundation named after ilka kuchereva well, at the end of the program, i will just remind you that we asked you on youtube whether support for ukraine will change after the elections in the united states of america. 293 people voted, 55% think it will increase, 36% think it will decrease. and 9% have it. my vision of the situation, well, as mr. oleksiy gran, professor of the kyiv-mohyla academy, correctly said, if the elections in the united states of america were not completed, we need to do our part, first of all, so that our armed forces continue to press the invaders from our tereniv well, the government has extended diplomatic work with representatives of foreign countries. who is watching youtube? don't forget to like or dislike and comment. well

, at the end of the program, i just want to remind you that we will meet soon, in just a week, there will be new ones topics, but there will be new guests, but it will be as always these in well, that's it, i say goodbye to you, my name is yuriy fizerl, see you , join the community with a ukrainian view of the world, become a sponsor of the youtube channel espresso and this is access to exclusive content - personal thanks, fixed comments, special icons there, the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click to sponsor and become part of the community with a ukrainian perspective mykola veresen, vitaly portnikov and the main topics of the week is if god forbid a truly tactical nuclear weapon is used against ukraine weapons it will definitely change the world history problem analysis and