i will see you from the air. hello dear, i want to tell you something. you are tired like a mother after a hard day and you don't know if tomorrow will be better because today is so difficult. everything will change. we, your children, ukrainians, will help you. you will become happy and we, together with you, because you have all the land, forests, factories, and the most valuable thing is that we are your children who love you when you are tired, exhausted, but dream of seeing you successful and happy

. if you go to war against us, the nation will show the cossack character live in peace the greatest value is to win a victory in the cause honor the rules of a warm country healthy care thank you for gaining energy on foot

regret the elevator and restore health we will overcome the winter together the government of ukraine in partnership with the un foundation in the field of the people of the population deploys the work of rescue centers in settlements that will receive war victims, social workers, psychologists and lawyers will provide free and confidential consultations in the centers, you can get psychological and legal support, find out about humanitarian assistance, settlement and social benefits, experts will also tell you how to get medical help and, if necessary, provide contacts of necessary specialists, find out about the work and addresses of the centers on the 24-hour government hotline 3:47 p.m., as well as on the national domestic violence prevention hotline of violence , human trafficking and gender discrimination by phone 116 123 well, our congratulations marathon single news continues in the studio working for you

olena sentila mykhaylov and the whole huge team of the channel we ukraine thank you for standing thank you for doing what you do best regardless of where you are now because we are all doing one common thing for the sake of the victory of the country actually the 257th day of the full-scale war of russia against our country and at this time we urge you, firstly, not to ignore air warning signals if they sound, and secondly, there is no need to film and distribute the places where enemy rockets were hit, as well as the consequences of these strikes, since this information will be useful for enemies we do not want to cooperate with him in this way in order to discuss the most important topics that happened in ukraine, that did not happen or happened in the world and in one way or another relate to this, we will invite oleksiy bryachenko - he is a candidate of political sciences, the executive director of the international association of small communities p. oleksii, please come in. good night. good night. please sit down. thank you for coming. thank you. what will we

talk about here ? the aggressor ukraine must withdraw its troops from the territory of our country, the adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine, mykhailo podolyak, wrote about this on his page in social networks. further quote , it is necessary to understand that ukraine has never refused negotiations, our negotiation position is known and open, first - first russia withdraws troops from ukraine, the second - then everything else. is putin ready, obviously no, that is why we are constructive in our assessment of who will speak with the next leader of russia, mykhailo podolyak, adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine, negotiations with russia are possible as soon as ukraine liberates kherson, nato and the european union are allegedly convinced of this, the publication for the republic writes about closed consultations between brussels and washington, saying that on the condition that the russians leave kherson, ukraine can sit down with them at the

negotiating table, already from a position of strength, they are not able to successfully respond to ukrainian offensive, their reaction is focused in a defensive key on the destruction of the infrastructure of electricity, water, bridges , roads, the construction of a triple line of trenches and the use of natural barriers such as the dnipro river, the goal is to slow down the advance of the ukrainian troops kherson is not just a city crucial for access to the sea and fundamental for control of surface resources and river transport, to win it back would mean forever changing the direction of the conflict from lara's article, the public meanwhile , russia is already preparing its citizens to think about surrendering kherson the russian edition of medusa received several copies of the methods developed in the kremlin, and in these documents it is proposed to tell that kyiv is allegedly preparing a series of terrorist attacks and provocations in the kherson region, among them the detonation of the kakhovskaya hpp. and this

according to russian propagandists, it can become a trap for their troops by blocking the paths for retreat. the kremlin says that it is not ready for such sacrifices and will do everything to protect its soldiers in another kremlin method. during the soviet security council of the russian federation, anatoly turkunov, he spoke and spoke at a meeting of historians with putin about the battle of poltava, then torkunov stated that before the victory in it, peter i was retreating from poltava and it was the retreat in the end led to a turning point in the war and a victory over the swedes. well, here it is worth noting that putin has yet to make a decision to retreat from kherson, this is what they say in medusa, and the russian authorities currently consider the surrender of kherson to be an undesirable but likely option for the development of events at the front. end of quote mr. oleksiy understand, if possible, in

the conditions when kherson and the kherson region are held hostage. when we hear stories that 80% of people have left the city, but we do not understand what is really happening, because people, in addition to the fact that in occupation, they are without communication, they are without electricity, they are without utilities and without the possibility to leave for the territory under the control of ukraine. there were many versions. to repeat the official position that has already been heard more than once from the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi and from the firm. the foundation of any beginning of negotiation processes should be the liberation of ukrainian territory as of 1991, this is the foundation, of course, it is also

necessary to ask questions about reparations, about the recognition of vii, well, they are about the return of our prisoners of war, that is, this is the complex that will allow customs officers to sit down at least for basic any negotiations, in any case, the de-occupation of kherson does not open up opportunities for the occupiers for the negotiation process, what kind of trick is this, then the information is from the republic with reference to their sources in washington are carried out from various countries and come from various mass media. remember, just recently , the washington post, at the moment, is not the american new york times, and there are articles from american experts, including experts who talk a lot about the negotiation process. that is, we we see that the media rhetoric of the russian federation has transformed a little. if earlier they directly demanded and begged for

negotiations, putin, lavrov, piskov, that is, officials of the russian federation, now the emphasis has changed and they are trying, through some opinion experts or mass media, to talk about something that everything is not so clear-cut, that let’s give kherson then from a position of strength, that is, do whatever you want in order for the western point of view to be transformed a little, as if they are pushing for victory, this is not happening and biden and the administration of the president of the united states is very stable and, let's say, has become in its view on this matter no negotiations without ukraine, this is the basic position and no negotiations are currently planned by putin. yes but there is a nuance, have you seen the statement of the spokeswoman who says that the united states prefers to see ukraine at j-20 , regardless of whether putin will be represented there, and moreover, they add that, in principle, no one

plans to meet with putin. the russian lobby remains so strong and influential in other countries except for those five that always vote for russia and against the civilized world that they can influence so seriously that even official people sometimes say such things that do not belong on civilized head and let's be frank with our keys, of course there are russian lobbies and until the russian federation there will be naphthodors, and they also have these libidinal initiatives and emissaries will work all over the world well, of course, here we need to divide these people into two categories, the first is what they are paid for, or sales experts or non-profits of mass information, who are ready to make extra money, yes, or the second, so-called useful idiots, yes, well, they just obey me, or as it is in the american e-e election manifesto they are trying to use our

anti-ukrainian positions somewhere to raise electoral points that are not for themselves. this is a minimum, it is a margin, but still, in any case, these positions are played and will be played. we should be used to this and we should clearly understand who said what. and what is the source? and these are the options that have been thrown in from unknown sources in recent days, from some secret negotiations, and you know that in most cases, in 99 cases, this is just a throw-in from the russian federation that is simply spreading through, with the help of the same russian federation, purely technically, briefly, because the pace is still a lot, but regarding the throw-ins from the russian side that kherson will be handed over as a preparation according to the edition of medusa, e-e, those documents that they have in the manuals and so on , in your opinion, e if this event happens and everything is really like that and on a trojan horse, well, again,

so as to lure our servicemen, will it be good for us, for russian politics and politicians, a bad break, so losing them to kherson and returning to ours territories yes our city, our settlements, all of them, not only kherson, kherson oblast, it will be a bad transition for them, or it will not work, which will break political russia. that the only regional center that the russian federation managed to buy was kherson , and this happened. by the way, not thanks to the successful actions of the military of the russian federation. and it is because of those collaborators that the ukrainian positions, well, that's a question, of course, to the sbu, so that they are all found and punished, so of course not

kherson - it's the road to odessa, well, we understand the people of kherson very well. extremely important. but , well, in fact, it plays a big role for putin as well, because if they lose essentially the only smoke on the occupied regional center, this will be a very clear and understandable marker for success of their so-called special operation. yes, that's why the situation is not easy. god, i'm not in a hurry yet without conclusions, whether they will surrender or not, let the ukrainian intelligence work. let them make their own decisions. we all trust the armed forces in this regard. the main thing is to do everything systematically and accordingly . and to all these questions, you really don’t have anything to say, so that it’s not really a trap for the truth, an explanation

of why sorogitin actually told it like that and why because, what do these complex decisions mean? it seems to me that people who call themselves citizens of russia absolutely do not care about difficult or easy decisions. that they watch it as detached as a tv series and until that moment until a package or a funeral package comes home, but the unpredictable happened except that they began to prepare reservoirs there in rostov-on- don in elevators they posted the souvenirs that need to be packed where. what do you think in the emergency suitcase? well , this is a cool story when from kyiv in three days to the bomb shelter and now, wait, vova is not waiting and the remains of my black sea fleet were still here the story is like that, well, now people in the elevators come in and see what should be in the alarming valiste, this actually contributes to the fact that the citizens of russia ask questions to their authorities, and this is if the factor of corpses

, the factor of packages did not affect this, the factor of fear also will not affect unusual, every factor that is aimed at the fact that what er-er should they think about with the citizens of the russian federation over what is happening, everyone influences of course the biggest biggest influence it had this so-called their this on mogilization yes eh or mobilization there they themselves are called completely differently because this is a breach of their social contract, they were ready not to follow on tv about any media victories of the so-called second army of the world, but in no case to take part in it personally and indeed on these packages with parts of these mobilized which after two sundays are no longer going in the opposite direction. of course they influence public opinion . statements to justify but what is actually

happening because this is exactly what they are talking about in russian kitchens. that is, we perfectly understand that the sanctions of the public, political, economic, etc. measures of the russian federation do not affect the russians indirectly, but when they started not to be allowed into the civilized world when they were forced to close their business when, because they were not able to flee from russia, when they were mobilized, they were mobilized . someone somewhere smoked some cotton er-er, that is, to constantly intensify, that is, at least not to dislodge putin's criminal tourist regime, but we perfectly understand that in addition to external pressure, there must also be internal resistance, which you have, first of all, from the citizens of the russian federation, but now

this foam in we are slowly losing sight of one more topic, let's discuss here now the company motor sich zaporozhye ukrnafta autocraze transformer, then ukrtatnafta will be transferred to the management of the ministry of defense of ukraine, these assets have the status of military this was reported by the secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine, oleksiy danilov. the decision on expropriation was made on november 5. the assets acquired the status of military property, their management was transferred to the ministry of defense of ukraine upon the end of martial law, in accordance with the requirements of the law . as the martial law ends in ukraine, the assets of strategic enterprises can return this statement of prime minister denys shmagalya and also he notes that these five enterprises must fully ensure the defense needs of our state in the war, they continue to work, receive more orders

and guarantees from the state, as of today , the shares of these five enterprises are forcibly alienated into the property of the state and legally appropriate alienation took place absolutely exclusively within the norms of the current legislation, these five enterprises are repeatedly managed and should fully provide for the defense needs of our country and the defense needs of our country in military time, strategically important enterprises produce products that are critically needed for the needs of defense and the needs of our armed forces, our army, as well as the energy sector, these enterprises work to work 24/7 for the needs of the defense of the state well, in fact, president volodymyr zelenskyi in his address, in particular,

commenting on about the fact that it does not exclude other similar decisions, but returning to these five yes enterprises that are now being alienated in favor of the state and their shares, are they not exactly so transferred to the department of the ministry of defense of ukraine. according to the legislation, what was seized for the duration of the martial law, and prime minister mygal also said about it that he would either compensate or return directly, so these assets are interested in this right now borychenko, now in the conditions of martial law, the only solution that will force the enterprise to work as efficiently as possible is to completely transfer to military rails . then the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, announced accordingly, and i will personally say that i support such a decision during the war. well, i think that the majority of ukrainians will share my position,

in fact, and moreover, we are talking about the transfer of part of the shares, that is, no, this is not just some private enterprise yes, so to speak , the state, on the basis of the current legislation, temporarily takes it into its own use . why is the point, that is, these enterprises have always worked in the interests, first of all, of the state and of the state order, but they probably did not work to the end if it turned out to be completely somehow i also give a very vivid example of what can really be in connection with corporate so-called management the question of where it is possible to make a profit is on the first place, on the first place, let’s say, on the approach, it was so creepy, why did anything happen to me at all, it was

completely different. ministry of defense, it will ensure the maximum mobilization of these enterprises now for the needs of defense and for the needs of the army, making them as effective as possible. he explained in the best possible way what these enterprises will be doing. the first is the repair and production of new elements and equipment that we now need . which today has a serious deficit, so of course, can we lay out solitaires and understand in which other enterprises can get into this list, departing from other similar decisions about which zelensky said that such enterprises are in fact quite a large number, we do not know about many of them, but the nsdc knows about them for sure, the ukroboronprom concern knows about them, respectively, where there are also serious shifts and serious changes, that is, now of course everything will be concentrated a-a for victory and

for the improvement of more effective work for the armed forces of ukraine, now each of us works exclusively for victory, such decisions in any case are the right initiative during martial law, i agree with the fact that everyone has to work in conditions where they mobilize agricultural machinery , escalators, tractors, and they are in different regions , regardless of whether hostilities are taking place in your region or not. it is very strange to have a share of state-owned enterprises that do not work at full capacity, and can no longer close the conclusion, but it is clear that political opponents yes, and they will use this quality and such well, it is not a place for politics than a patch of some kind of politics yes this is martial law and do you remember how at the beginning of the war yes especially the first two weeks when the local self-government bodies took on the

key function of forming the defense forces, what do you think of the recommendations on the scoreboard immediately for how they should form dugouts where they have roadblocks and form this all happened in principle at the horizontal level at the level of the regions and you absolutely correctly said that they used the agricultural library of the same farmers the same entrepreneurs who at their own expense gave for their fuel for their own for their solar power and did it absolutely normally, understanding that the country was at war, the country was attacked by the aggressor the russian federation and everyone now has to work as one. in such a case , ponaberichenko has one more point, not about political manipulation, but if you look logically at the enterprise , under the conditions of martial law, it was transferred to the military , to the military rails, so because, well, they were not working properly, if it was not working properly

for more than 250 days of full-scale war, do you foresee the clearing of the augean clovers in search of those who are guilty or responsible, why haven’t you completed the work? at the moment, it is not necessary to translate it. let it work one hundred percent on the rails, which are necessary today, yes. after the end of the war, we'll figure it out . it's a good question. and why didn't you change to military rails? oh, you know, i didn't get a call outside the zone because the call didn't go through. now is not the time for us to organize some kind of fun there or to look for the culprits. but of course, if the security service there assumes a theoretical i of such a claim as for now jesus motor sich, again, which we mention today more than once, then they should work separately and in parallel within the framework of the initiated criminal proceedings, and this is clearly provided for by the current legislation of ukraine, and

the maximum task now is to rebuild the most effective rails of those enterprises that should work for defense and our victory and make this is as fast as possible, what is needed is to change the management for supply chains and fill government orders, that is, all this must work as quickly as possible, and you think that is why law enforcement agencies will be in the planned order, so to speak, to look for who is guilty and who is not guilty, who is working as hard as possible today for our victory. this is the armed forces of ukraine, and even before the war with russia, they demonstrated compatibility with the nato army, and the war only proved that our servicemen can work with the alliance of the alliance. malinda simmons announced great britain's pass in ukraine , and she reminded that nato is open to countries that can collectively play their role in european security, but for ukraine to join the alliance, it is necessary to carry out significant reform in this defense sector, the only thing that this war did and no

one wanted to show how much ukrainian the armed forces are capable of operating with standard nato equipment, but in fact we knew this even before the war, but we also knew that the problem was not interoperability in the sense that it had already been done, it was about institutional the reform of defense mechanisms, defense procurement of defense human resources, etc., where, as we all know , there is still a lot of work to be done melinda simmons, ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of great britain in ukraine, another important alliance to fight against russian aggression is the alliance of ukraine, britain and poland, although it will not replace nato in the ministry poland's foreign affairs ministry urges ukrainians not to place high hopes on this association because it will not be able to change the security structure of ukraine , deputy minister of foreign affairs of poland marchyn pshidach announces that there is currently only one alliance in the world that is really capable of protecting ukraine, and this alliance

is nato. the alliance that is capable of protecting ukraine or the alliance in the first place that surrenders and provides a sufficient number of weapons for ukraine to defend itself is this the first moment of my question and the second point, what role can this alliance with poland and great britain play on our path to nato? even defense economic unions, due to their bureaucracy, they are sometimes clumsy in decision -making, for example, the same nato, including that, and remember that johnson, who will then be the prime minister of britain, proposed the union of poland, the baltic states and britain, respectively ukraine with the addition of one of the key partners, even turkey, yes, that is, and uh,

these are parallel tracks. three years in the region, the alliances will only bring us closer, and not only to nato, which is enshrined as our aspiration in the constitution. but in including more economic unions such as , let's say, the european union. therefore, this is an absolutely normal process, but nato, if we talk about nato, returning is not only about weapons or providing them in a larger form and in greater quantity, it is also about standards, it is also it's about communication and information, because we know very well who owns information and who doesn't own the world , that's why, in fact, even in many respects it's about the economy. yes, it's not only not only in one weapon, but only in the matter. therefore, now is the time to really work with those blocs with those alliances and with which we have the most unconstructive relations now it is now nato now it is our static partners britain the united states, that is, those who can help us right now specifically for those needs a-a

, including the military that we need well, a more effective example can be said of the anti-putin association rammstein. there are approximately 14 countries where nato representatives say that the ukrainian military can and successfully use standard nato equipment. that's what i want to say ours use standard nato equipment in a non-standard way, this is firstly and secondly, let's not reject a clear understanding that we are not you and me today, but our army and we are a country seriously needed by nato beyond the irony that nato can apply to join the armed forces and we we clearly understand that there is no such experience of conducting hostilities and working with various types of weapons, their communication and coordination in any country, and it is certain that nato is seriously interested in our military transferring experience, well, i wonder if they will summon or invite or engage our military even before we win or

immediately after the victory and of course after the victory we need our military first of all to defend ukraine and occupy the territory to free our people and then we will talk about what kind of not the transfer of experience to our partners well, now we need their support and financial, political and, above all, of course, weapons well, that's why we need to emphasize this but the fact that ukraine is currently the most effective the most balanced, most versatile and effective army in the world, i absolutely agree , and this is one of our e-e after victory will be key advantages of non-negotiation processes with our partners, because in most countries, even in which e-e often took part in peacekeeping operations, this contingent all the same, it is quite limited, it is small, ukraine is now militarized to the maximum and knows how to use non-standard

as much as possible.