the standard of living is insignificant compared to the ukrainian one, and in general it cannot result in any political protests in dissatisfaction, so unfortunately, they are throwing arcadia into the fire of war. to russia in a negative sense. they are buying oil. they are trying to do more now. so that in the event of a complete economic shutdown or, let's say, russia's restrictions on the international arena, there was something to trade with and there was a supply of this oil and gas. why are they yes. what can this lead to and why did the countries make such a decision? well, i don't quite

understand about naftogaz. in india, they are probably based on some understanding of their own. well, well, i’ll make this question even more specific. you know that the secretary general of the organization of large-scale nations, mr. guterish, two days ago made an interesting statement about what he expects. uh, continuation of the grain deal uh, for a long time the period and that russia will not prevent it, and the plus is that he added the unblocking and the organization, how is it correct to say corridors for the export of mineral udos, no, in principle, the question of mineral fertilizers is probably the question of the main trade uh, between russia, the un,

and turkey, uh, regarding its participation in the grain corridor, uh, and it turns out, so you're hot and he's going, uh , about well, i'm just now expressing an opinion that i won't read among your colleagues yes yes i understood well, i would say that's what he is in general, the organization of the united nations is talking about the secretaries of the previous day, you know, these are not politicians . it turns more into such a decoration, and the general secretary, by definition, says such things in his dream, and yours and ours, all the time, the search for compromises so that everyone is

satisfied, and at that time, when of course, i already said later that it is necessary to show political will to the parties on which it depends, so i would not give too much importance today, he said yes , tomorrow he will explain the current situation , otherwise, some minor minor issues е может нескорение резулить and мм мм быть месторание, nevertheless, the main thing is, ее, the main issues are resolved, of course, behind the scenes, at those negotiations that we do not know, есть есть confidential есть еет, under the guise of humanitarian issues еет, the whole the agenda is a whole package, i have agreed to concessions on some issues, here is such a plan and supplies, they are accompanied by concessions on the other side, there

may even be military issues , so it is a complex complex and they will consider all these messages, mmm, you need them in a complex. ammonia yes, this is a separate issue that has already been raised by russia more than once. you know that this is a gas pipeline, or an ammonia pipeline, that’s how it’s done in odessa. it will actually be stopped with the beginning of a full-scale invasion, and in fact, yes. there is such a thing subject to sanctions, well, if it is allowed, there would be no oil, it is a very painful thing for the russian federation, and it is not just that ammonia is standing - it is one of these streams of guaranteed income. what about aluminum, for example, where is it on the market the structure of russia controls a very, very large piece, which means

a number of non-ferrous metals and ammonia. it is absolutely true that this is one of those tools of the economy where it is not just a joke. where putin can speculate on it. there are many weak positions, as i already said, it is possible to get from him, i gave up in one place, but received in another, that is, this complex, again, mr. arcadiy, regarding import substitution, and we understand, hmm, about import substitution, what is missing now this concerns russia and this system that will help to make new equipment. well, of course, all the things for which you can buy in the store because there is not enough of it and it is very

felt. i'm from siberia, from novosibirsk , i've been in america for four months now, i'm forced to be in new york, but i constantly communicate with my compatriots in siberia. a few months after the start of the war, there will be a more dramatic situation in six months. this is the average business, um, people find workarounds, yes, more expensive, yes, slow, but these

deliveries are coming. you said correctly that there is no special island in oscar’s field. some positions mean the seats of european and japanese cars, there are chinese cars, so the people don’t feel it, they don’t feel it, they don’t worry. what is more important is the supply of components for microchip weapons, that’s all it means. all of course more sensitively for russia is running out of stock, it informs that others mean microcircuits are broken out of household appliances, even in armenia , there was a message there that increased several times

for the purchase of household appliances there washing machines just like that it is possible to extract and apply it for military production, here it is, it is also indicative, therefore, in general, the situation is improving, but it is not such a significant factor that would have a significant effect on the world. today, in fact, midterm elections will be held in the congress of the united states, and i remember this because it is precisely with this event that america associates the delayed decision to join the united states with such a sanction as limiting oil prices. yes , there are internal reasons. biden , the democrats don't want to do this, but this is a question. he will be back soon. what do you

think about limiting oil prices? this is a war. the pressure will be sanctioned to fill the budget of the russian federation. i think yes. and uh, actually, all the decisions that have already been made in europe, including those postponed until december and january in america, here is where i am, everything is of course, um, uh, they are very much waiting for tomorrow 's election results, and the forecast is such that eh republicans will get the necessary votes to control the congress, but at the same time, if he talks about the topic that concerns us all, it means the supply of weapons to ukraine, then there are democrats and probably 2/3 of the republicans here in the republican party

there is a rift, they definitely stand firm on the positions of sufficient supply of ukraine. here is the case, it is possible to attribute the question related to oil to oil. yes, in america, inflation is always present before elections. the negativity will be smoothed out and won't annoy the voter, but nevertheless i think that right after the elections, maybe after some time , they won't pay attention to it anymore, how long now? er, the necessary decisions are limited in the area er, papa nefte and er, regarding russia a-a arkady yes, it’s very interesting, we’re waiting a-a, in fact, for us it’s tomorrow and for you well, it’s almost today arkady yankovsky,

a publicist, the head of the discussion club, was on a direct call connection within the framework of the information marathon, the only news, well, we continue, we continue, the monument to the russian empress catherine ii in odessa seems to finally move, well, where it is not yet known, but it will move, it will not come, and it will move after the majority of otocytes in the electronic in the survey, they voted that she had no place in the ukrainian city. kateryna was wrapped in black film and a fence was made all meters high. well , taras honcharuk, a professor of the department of ukrainian history at the odessa national university, believes that in this way kateryna is being protected from odessa activists, in fact, the further fate of the monument odessa government will decide at the end of the month, the mayor of the city, gennady trukhanov, spoke in favor of moving the monument to the historical theme park that is planned to be created in odesa, and get in touch with us

now volodymyr tylishchak is the deputy head of the institute of national remembrance. good morning, congratulations. good morning, an interesting topic was chosen just in time for the morning in order to revive a little emotionally. finally, a similar issue has been resolved with the transfer of the monument to catherine ii e in odesa, although it is not the only one. it is not the only one. the monument and the russian empire in odesa as far as we know hmm now it was a similar moment of principle and the public one won how can you comment well actually the decision will be made by the deputies of the odesa city council uh, when when they will make a decision, then we can say that uh, that fate has already been decided for now, so uh, changes, we see that, after all, in odesa

, uh, there is an approval or understanding that this symbol uh imperial markers must be removed from the public space of the city, and this is well, it is very nice because uh, um, questions uh, uh, around this monument and have existed for a long time, in fact , since the very moment when it was installed in 2007, uh, since then there are ongoing discussions whether it is needed or not. i think that the solution is eh the deputies will finally make a decision about its cleaning and thus imperialism in

odesa in ukraine will be less. the monument was actually erected in 2007. on the one hand, it is a new creation, and on the other hand, it uses historical sculptures which have historical value and which were taken from the museum space of ukraine and obviously these eh the sculptures must return to the museum space, the question is whether or not it actually has an artistic artistic value there. well, let the experts decide what the future fate of these monuments can be, whether they are of cultural value or not. we know so far among the ideas is the transfer of this monument to a park of

historical themes, what kind of parks can these be in general, what will happen next with these or buildings or monuments or historical values, what will they be there next, what kind of premises or in general, do you have any ideas on what to do with this? well , there is a practice related to the preservation or presentation of monuments of the communist era in the museum space. this is a european practice of creating such parks of sculptures in ukraine. the idea is being worked out somewhere, in particular, in putivla, a similar park has been created there in the zazzanskyi forest, where there are already about a hundred soviet monuments of the soviet era that were removed from public space as

part of the processes we call decommunization therefore, it is obvious that the creation of one or another museum object that will have a certain tourist potential is, in principle, absolutely possible, it is obvious that it should also be discussed, the information of its concept should be discussed, but this it is absolutely possible and appropriate that this is one of the ways of a civilized attitude towards those objects that will be removed from the public space, well actually somewhere in this spirit. that is how trukhanova commented on his support that everything should be civilized and there is another interesting detail with this the monument is to catherine ii. the investigative committee of the russian federation will investigate the abuse of the monuments to catherine the second and

suvorova in odessa. will you react to this, well, this is absolutely propagandistic russian er russian step er similar to the steps they have already taken regarding the monuments there secretly on suvorov in kherson when they took them er that's why it was removed here the aggressor is trying to demonstrate some kind of participation, but it is obvious that the participation of the aggressor is the same everywhere, only destruction and

attempts to discredit the actions of the actions of ukraine. with the removal of prakov, the cinema with the monument to suvorov, er, will become the beginning of some such de-russification, in principle, in the entire southern ukraine. and here are such interesting facts that er, the city council, for example, mocked it, odesa region decided not to wait for any petitions and already they decided to dismantle the monument to suvori, this is one such example, but for example in kharkiv they still can't decide the fate of pushkin's bust, so in kyiv they decided in kharkiv they can't, i wonder where this process is now, will it probably be the beginning of a chain well, in fact, this process of rethinking our, well, the historical past of our ties with russia, it started earlier, and in fact, it was the russian invasion of

ukraine in february that forced ukrainians to look at everything related to russia in a new way, that is, this process he it is taking place somewhere more actively, somewhere more slowly, but the thing is that for ukraine today, this aggressive imperial essence of the activity of the russian government in various guises in ukraine is becoming obvious, this is a fact, this is very important in this process. -e to maintain balance and e-e public dialogue and therefore, obviously, we see from a large record of society on a-and this is the elimination of markers of imperialism, because in reality e these monuments they appeared not e-e as an initiative

of local communities so these monuments were appearing were established because these were decisions that were not thrown from above in order to establish in the public space of ukrainian cities the image of russia as the highest cultural subject as the imperial center to emphasize these it is obvious that this is the attitude of this propaganda today is unacceptable and accordingly there are various public initiatives aimed at making it more radical somewhere more moderate but in order to rethink or re-think and to remove these symbols of imperialism from the public space, this and not only that, but at the moment, who

forms these lists, or is it happening as we discussed with you, that people are gathering to express their protest against this or that object that is located in the central square of their the city and thus then the local authorities begin to decide whether to demolish the monument or not. is it possible to already have a list of those objects that should be destroyed because they promote so or carry russian ideology there, how does it happen now, the authority in this area is that of the local self-government bodies to make a decision to dismantle or not to dismantle some objects. this is the exclusive competence of the local self -government bodies. the verkhovna rada has registered several draft laws on

this topic, so today there are no single general lists. in the award of the sister of culture and information policy of ukraine, an expert council on issues of overcoming the consequences has been created. russification of totalitarianism, which works on these issues and provides its recommendations, the council is complex in its recommendations, it just insists on the need for a balanced approach, not on the possibility of some generalized lists, because each issue , each object must be considered separately, but really the expert council determined er, here are the 10 most er, 10 names of figures, er, does it mean, er, or

to which the largest number of objects are dedicated, there are street names in ukraine that are not related to ukrainian history, which are so, one of the most bright symbols of this imposed connection with russia in ukraine well, but decisions should be made by local councils, we believe that such a decision should be made on the basis of a dialogue with communities with an expert environment and obviously in each in each in this happens in every city , and the procedures for this dialogue are different. this is exactly the voting of odessa residents . published in the recommendations of the expert council, these recommendations can be found on the website of the

ministry of culture, information policy, and on our website of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance, where we have created a special section where we will mix these recommendations of the expert council regarding two more such objects of interest which are less talked about, of course, they are both in kyiv, well, first of all, this is the situation with the monument to nicholas every year, this is not non-imperial russia , bolshevik russia. so, this is one story with him and the second story - this is my connection, volodymyr. yes, and the second story - it is with the grave, you know stolypin, who just happened to be with her under the walls of the church on the territory of the pechersk lavra , and those people who know about it are watching there constant fresh flowers, well, regarding those objects, if we are talking about the

sixth monument, it is really a long story, because its transfer, its removal from public space is still determined by the law on the prohibition of condemnation of communist and nationalist totalitarian regimes, it is forbidden by their propaganda, and this story continues in 2017, when the decision was made, but it has not yet been implemented, and the issues related to the monument of the sixth, they consist, first of all, in the fact that , after all, it really is this sculpture is a work of high art, and it is obvious that its dismantling must be accompanied by its transfer to the museum space, the question is how to do it, plus there are technical questions, as they told me, er, the employees of the kyiv city state

administration, but it remains to be hoped that this issue will be resolved and in the end this imposed symbol of soviet propaganda will be moved from the center of the city to the museum space and in order to er, in order to er and implement the law on condemnation of the communist regime and, in principle, to remove the marker er well, that marker imposed on and in the end the monument itself to this er person who is involved in crimes against ukraine and crimes against the people of kiev directly outside the center of the city it is the grave of stolypin, but here it must be taken into account that it is primarily a grave. that is, there we have it , uh, this grave is

uh , according to uh. in fact, because the lavra is still a museum, that's why the situation here is a little different. i'm not yet ready to comment on how the fate of this object will be decided, well, it's clear, it 's just its trace in ukrainian history. it's in quotation marks extraordinary, you just have to understand it volodymyr, in relation to our historical cultural losses, it is meant whether there is information on how many historical cultural monuments of ukraine have been destroyed by the occupiers in the temporarily occupied territories , can we already say something about it? the ministry of culture and information policy

pays attention to this in fixing, but we see on the one hand the destruction that is carried out by the aggressor and on the other hand we see how the aggressor is actively robbing our cultural monuments including the museums of kherson or other cities that are under occupation. this is obviously another war crime, and in russia, the number of objects that were damaged or destroyed during the military invasion of aggression, they are increasing by dozens, if not by hundreds, yes. that is, i am not ready to say this exactly, er, the exact number, but this situation is being monitored , a corresponding register of such destruction is being kept

, volodymyr, thank you very much for joining our broadcast. thank you, volodymyr telishchak was with us on communications deputy head of the institute of national memory thank you well, the only informational marathon, the only news continues, we will be back literally in a moment, stay with us, real ukrainians, peace-loving, kind-hearted, and also our hearts, as long as they don't touch us, because if we go to war against us, the nation will show a cossack character to live in peace

the greatest value is to win a victory in business honor in the morning when you go to work you smile at your neighbor the neighbor thanks the barista for his coffee with a nice tip and she saves a warm scarf and part of the money for them for that scarf, it will go to a bronik or a fairy tale to others in your neighbor, every day of ours, every step, every deed can protect those who protect us thanks to you, our dear defenders and defenders, we smile at each other in the morning, we thank the border freely