i.e. for what concerns aid to ukraine and related to this application, because it also talks about the strengthening of american troops in europe and so on, it is extraordinary that there is a large part of this money, it is precisely for aid to ukraine, for military aid, that is, for weapons for aid to the ukrainian budget for humanitarian aid, if the current congress can accept it, then the aid will be funded until september 30 of the next year, well, the congress can even accept accept such a thing that it can even extend it for two financial so far, that is, even for the 24th year, i do not know whether they will do everything or not, for example, the financing of military aid in ukraine is carried out from two sources at the moment, both sources are budgetary, but these are different articles of the budget, one article of the budget is an initiative to help ukraine in the field of security, this money is budgeted so that the

pentagon can order weapons from their manufacturers specifically for ukraine, so that when they are manufactured, they can be handed over to ukraine, and let's say two systems for us or join, received this the other day it was just paid from these funds because it was stipulated specially in june and july these two complexes were manufactured specially by order of the controlled for ukraine, currently they have been transferred to ukraine and there is another article - this is an article that finances the presidential authority to transfer weapons to a friendly country under extraordinary circumstances, this is when weapons, ammunition, equipment are transferred directly or from the base of the american army in ukraine, that is, this is what is done directly by presidential order, it is simply necessary also to finance, that is, weapons are added, the government must

order the same weapons so that they return to the bases. thus, because there are certain standards, eh, let's say how many of the same eh 155 mm should be there, how many should be heimers, you are something else but they can't can't go below below certain norms so here they are these are the main budgetary sources of aid funding and simply the administration must have them in order to provide assistance i hope i hope that the leader of congress can ensure that it works in the 23rd year at least well, then the administration will have to work on this with the congress and the ukrainian diplomat will have to work very carefully on this with the relevant members of the congress because the republicans will have the majority to work with the relevant republican members of the congress this will be a very, very important task for the

ukrainian diplomats because this it must be done. well, not in front of the television, but it must be done. you must talk to them, you must convince them. you understand that the problems with the republicans are not that all republicans do not support ukraine. this is not the case . i think that the majority supports the problem is that, with the appearance of trump , a lot of people with far-right views appeared among the republicans. far- right republicans, in principle , advocate such an isolationist policy that america is generally aloof from what is being done in europe, we don't need this, we need to concentrate the ship. because here it is done at home and is not interested in what is done in the world in general. if we add to this, let's say that a person like trump, well for him, putin is, i don't know, let's say he's a hero, a strong man like any other dictator and if you know all this, the

interference of these two factors leads to the fact that far-right republican politicians are really against aid in ukraine this affects the fact that even the leaders of the republicans influence the representatives, e.e. kevin mccarthy, who if the republicans win the elections to the chamber, he will become the speaker, he is generally such a moderate republican politician. he even, let's say, in the 15th year, when the republic was he wanted to be the speaker because the previous speakers, john bonner, he resigned and left the congress, he could not become one of them because the right-wing republicans did not want to support him, but now he is forced to be elected so that he is forced to reckon with what is many rules as republicans, in any case, in the new house there will be much more representatives than he depends on them, that's why he is now

maneuvering because he wants to become the speaker. thank you. part of politics, and i say once again that a lot will depend on the ukrainian deputies in washington, they will have to work in this case with republican legislators, especially with those moderate among them, with whom you can work, you need to work, we will work, we will convince you. thank you for including us in our ihor eisenberg, professor of new york university, was with us on the air , friends, the topic of the elections in the united states of america, we will continue, so stay with us, and now a short break from cossack times under the cossack cross, we defend our native land, we fight for truth and freedom, we believe in our victory,

glory to the defenders of ukraine, i defend ukraine, my blue sky, the morning silence of the forest, the fields, i defend the culture, tradition, the cossack land, i defend the borders of my country, i defend what is important, life, my family mothers, brothers, wives, i protect my ukraine, will, freedom, love, we are the ones who are building a new, strong, free and independent ukraine, i protect, i protect, i protect, i protect the border of freedom, the border

of dignity, the border of humanity, the border of indomitability the border victory state border service of ukraine primacy honor the rules of a warm country healthy care thank you for gaining energy on foot spare the elevator and restore your health let's overcome the winter together horror on black from rage and malice armed to the teeth she thrust into the lonely heart of ukraine to plunge us into an abyss of fear hatred and impoverishment were standing in the direction of kyiv, that's all the military equipment was standing. that's why they already saw when they had already

left the first units of equipment, the shelling began from one side, it's not scary as long as life. please but it’s still scary for the sex, well, i wanted to cut off my fingers, it became a task for them, they couldn’t take it like that, and they just showed their anger, malice, hatred in public, a documentary film, a column today at 21:30 in marathon, the only news tv channel, we, ukraine, continue the marathon, the only news, and we we are talking about the course and potential outcome of the midterm elections in the united states of america, but for some reason it is customary that we talk with foreign experts on this matter, although this is not surprising because those who live in the united states of course, the united states is more understood in the internal

kitchen of the united states, but we can inquire with the opinion of ukrainian political scientists about what we need to do in order not to lose the support of the united states, which is very important for us, regardless of how the americans vote , smooth volunteers, political analysts of public organizations, the word is business with we are now in touch with the smooth ones good night good good night and here is the question addressed to you, what needs to be done in ukraine so that the support of the united states remains constant on that what is the level today? and it is possible even at the highest level. well, to be predictable and consistent is the main thing. this is, in principle, the main approach that gives results in any relationship, including in international relations. this is predictability, consistency and the ability to find common interests, because we need to understand that we today they help not because everyone suddenly loved us so much, but because somewhere the interests coincided and well, we have

to. the help we receive from our western partners is not an act of charity charity - it is their investment in their own security, it is necessary to understand that today ukraine, by giving from russian aggression, solves a whole range of low-level strategically important issues of global security, and therefore we must emphasize this precisely for that so that every average american realizes that this is a rhetorical question that trump or some republicans are asking about the fact that ukraine is not near our borders. yes, and ours. we invest there we spend money to help ukraine, that is why we must constantly work not to pretend to answer, so that every american understands that

ukraine is not somewhere far away, it is not at all that there is no importance for americans, and then i think that there are no problems with this well, so that at least the answer to this question can be given adequately for their own voters by american politicians, and i think that both republicans and democrats, in fact, if they now leave this choice of pre-election struggle, well, this is an election you understand, and everyone made some kind of speculation on their topics. and now they will have to solve the issue of governance, and they are already confusingly performing the functions of governance. i am sure that there are a lot of the same republicans who spoke enough. i would say that with ill-considered and careless statements , they will simply calibrate them and become more moderate, therefore and i, personally, before the elections, it was normal, there were no such fears, something could fundamentally change, but not all the more. now after the elections, because the revolutionaries by and large

and we can't tell you that they won such a water gate victory. well, besides , let's not forget that the american political system is quite complex and some of my fellow political scientists say that american democracy is actually a vetocracy . that is, when any decision, in principle, can be blocked by a minority that does not agree with this decision, therefore, even being in the minority, i repeat even if such a situation, god forbid , happens, i am practically sure that even being in the minority of supporters of ukraine, they can block those decisions that can potentially harm the current two-party, essentially nationwide support for the american people. i am not afraid of even such a statement of the ukrainian people, mr. valentin, let's talk about the negotiations that the russian federation is talking about on a daily basis. therefore, ukraine should not

agree on russia's terms, in order to end the war quickly, nato secretary general jen stoltenberg said that he is sure of such concessions only will inflame the ambitions of the aggressor country and will provoke new attacks, moreover, it will not only be about ukrainian territories, but also about nato member states and their allies, he recalled how the russians demanded that the alliance stop expanding and not accept more new members if russia can , using crude military force to achieve the desired, it will definitely be a disaster for ukraine, but it will also be dangerous for all of us because it will mean that the use of brute force is the way to achieve political goals and obtain control over neighboring countries jens stoltenberg , secretary general of nato, meanwhile, they say there are no conditions for the start of negotiations russia is only

asking ukraine to show good will and start a dialogue such a quote from the deputy minister of foreign affairs of russia andriy rudenko leads propaganda - the propagandist russian media lead, i will remind you on october 4 president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, in response to the nsdc's decision on the impossibility of negotiations with the president of the russian federation , vladimir putin, in his turn stated who is willing to wait until kyiv is ready for peace talks, valentina, the nsdc considers such a statement from the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation to be manipulation, in your opinion, that it is a lie, not because in reality it is not ukraine. federation, it is not ukrainian servicemen who committed and continue to commit

crimes against the civilian population of the russian federation, well, this is not ukraine, there are always attacks on the civilian infrastructure of the russian federation, well this is what the russian federation did and continues to do, so there is such a thing as a performative contradiction about it when what you say is completely dissonant and does not correspond to what you do. so let's not forget that even when the russians signed this grain agreement , they in the same on the day odesa port was shelled, this is a plastic example, so to speak, of performative inconsistency. well, when on the one hand you talk about the alleged readiness for negotiations, and at the same time you continue to kill, terrorize the civilian population, and increase your military presence in the occupied territories, i don't know, are you holding any forces with referendums there, or are you even getting close to holding a mobilization in the

occupied territories? that allegedly russia is not willing to negotiate, no negotiations, they are in them well, but they want to create the impression that they allegedly negotiated, that they are allegedly interested in negotiations, that allegedly the only thing interferes with the achievement of a peaceful settlement - this is the position of ukraine. well, we must understand that they are promoting this thesis in the international arena. well, thank god, such statements are what we heard from the table over there , and we heard from good and bad reprimands, we heard similar statements and even from macron he has all this saying that this russian special operation is informational and psychological. well, it does not achieve the result, but its purpose is clear to present it so that they supposedly want peace, but

they do not want bad ukrainian women, bad ukrainian government they agreed on what to agree on, they agreed, they were ready to agree. well, the language was clearly outlined. by the way, it was outlined later by zelenskiy, by the way, and permakov. well, who clearly noted the first is the restoration of the territorial integrity of the state sovereignty of ukraine within the internationally recognized borders. well, that is, the russian armed forces have to leave the entire territory of ukraine, the second is security guarantees, the third is the accession to the eu, the fourth is compensation for the destroyed infrastructure and the destroyed economy, and the fourth is the fifth. more precisely, this is bringing to justice all those guilty of the crimes committed. well, our position is simple , understandable and very transparent. the russians can at any time fulfill it, show another act of kindness and, in fact, proceed to a peaceful settlement, and as long as their troops

are on our territory they conduct hostilities and terrorize the free population , then all their statements about the alleged readiness for a peaceful settlement and negotiations are simply a refined preaching delusion to which we must absolutely respond because we cannot but take into account but must react just as i have just now. actually speaking and outlining that they do not want to negotiate, i will tell you more that so far , the parties retain hope that they can change the situation through military means or strengthen or weaken the negotiating positions, so far, in principle, this cannot be to be relative even to the situation in ukraine and russia, this is just a classic, it works like this, it is arranged in its own way, for today we see that ukraine is definitely not going to talk about anything there as long as they are on our territories, and the russians until they have the opportunity to

be on our territory, even by military means, and by grabbing onto our territory, by mining it, by digging in it, well, until then, they are also not ready for any negotiations, and i can just say one more time that we are often mined at the time of the surrender of germany in the first world war, germany occupied a large part of france in particular, and this absolutely did not save germany from capitulation . means that it is inevitable that they will be defeated and destroyed on all fronts or in all directions by military means, that is, there are many other instruments as a result of which they can simply fall apart, because i will repeat that for today, no matter how festival-like it sounds for someone may be optimistic, but in reality this is realistic until

the castors retain the ability to conduct hostilities, hostilities will continue and if the russians want to stop the bloodshed, they will very simply can carry out an assessment, or as biden said in this regard, well, during his speech at the un general assembly, he said very simply, if russia stops fighting, the war will stop and the war will disappear; if ukraine stops fighting, then ukraine will disappear, so we cannot afford to stop fighting, but note that just seven days ago, maria zakharova, spokeswoman for the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation, said that russia is ready for negotiations taking into account the new territorial realities, so that this does not mean that after 7 days rudenko comes out and

says that we are not putting forward any conditions at all. let's start negotiations. we should look for a pattern in this. is this some kind of game? is this just an attempt to save face during a bad game ? - you understand what negotiations are, negotiations are a tool, a tool for what to achieve some goal, that is, for what purpose we have to conduct negotiations with the russian federation today, what is the purpose of these negotiations, well the russian federation clearly has a goal, they want to gain time because they have problems with stabilization, which by and large has not been very successful for them . they don't have time to solve it, that's why they really want us now, instead of occupying your territories by military means, to start engaging with them in an absolutely pointless and lengthy discussion

i support their side about the peaceful settlement, as i just said, i will not repeat it. yes, what do you mean by the peaceful settlement, we simply understand it differently and i am afraid that we will not find common ground, not only will we not find civilized reporting. well, the second moment, i am simply repeating that it is necessary to understand that the federation is quite dependent on what decision they approve in the domestic political arena , they are porting to a protracted war, they are not going to stop them. they want to increase the term... military services, we conduct additional training at school, they all try to save military things, by the way, ukraine is the same well, by and large, they are aware of this and make certain corrections, ask the decision of the ukrainian authorities to forcibly alienate some assets of some enterprises well, for what for so that the

functioning of these enterprises is more effective. by the way, i also wrote a shield against them on facebook, well, about the er plant of rights, which at one time did not fulfill and now is disrupting defense orders repeats yes, that is, the effect of the automobile plant that was supposed to produce the appropriate equipment for the armed forces of ukraine and the order is interrupted by the lord. beautiful, wonderful, feels great today being abroad or its owners. well, it seems to me that in such conditions it is absolutely natural for the rest to take that step which the ukrainian language did. it was necessary, by the way, that you are the only thing that earlier, i think that it is possible that this is not the last step in that direction, because this is the way to do it today, whether you like it or not but the messenger is very simple, everything is for the front, everything is for the package, i will allow myself to say that, well, in russian, yes, soviet cows, because today it is fundamentally important for us, and such a position is for

us. we understand that the materials are acting in this direction. they are not going to well, to move towards peace, they still want war, they just use it as a tactical pause, so i’ll take a break, and how to say, not in order to pick up some of them, and we realize this, as i’m still there, that is, the actions of our leader military and political evidence that russia is aware of that strategy and we will prepare the same scenario nato secretary general genstotenberg says that these concessions will only fuel the ambitions of the aggressor country and therefore concessions should not be followed in any case a what does this indicate that nato understands that ukraine needs to be supported more and will there really be more of this support, that we want planes, we need new

systems, new weapons, does it mean that there will be more of it, that we will really be able to close the sky and ourselves protect so well, first of all, it is necessary to understand that the concessions on the part of ukraine that will allow the aggressor country, russia, to get some results here, well, they will contribute to the erosion of international political relations not only in europe, but also in this world. well, that is, russia can turn out to be far from the only state that will try to achieve certain political goals by military means , and they do not hesitate to go to war directly. well , this can turn the dark ball into a very dangerous place where many states can not to resist the temptation and use weapons against your neighbors, i repeat, it can also be about not only europe and nato, but also the good conscience

, that is, it is not only about russia, ukraine, it is about the rules of the game, it is about the principles on which the world will function, so i tend to think that today more and more subjects of international archaeological law of international relations and essentially the authors of the current architecture of the global political order as it is called in fact, today it wants to destroy this order. well, the fact that it is supported by such marginal countries as iran, north korea, belarus, and syria is precisely what is very revealing in this aspect , that is, the actions of states that are terrorist states that absolutely do not hide their desire to destroy the current world in the form in which it exists, it is clear that the only adequate response of the civilized world to such a position can only be to provide ukraine with all the necessary

tools in order for russia to be defeated in of that war and all other potential aggressors , after looking at the fate of russia, realized that it is better not to try to solve wars and not to try to achieve some new political goals through military means. that is, it should simply be a kind of method and an educational moment for all other aggressive terrorist regimes, and i think that we will get all the necessary tools. look at the statistics. well, once upon a time, russian planes bombed ukrainian cities, today they mostly launch missile strikes, and they are already afraid to enter the airspace and they shoot down missiles even when a much larger number of missiles have reached the target. to date, most of the missiles are shot down by the air defense forces of ukraine, these mopeds are iranian, this is also a problem now, but in

the near future, ukraine will solve this problem. moreover, i would just like to once again emphasize and draw your attention to the fact that we are not only protecting ourselves , but in some places we are going into counter-attacks, and the same mr. vytyok, that is, the head of the cyber ​​security department of the security service of ukraine in his in the interview, he said that in cyberspace, ukraine significantly outnumbers the russians and causes them serious losses in this cyberspace, and i think that it is the same there. well, not the last role is played by the technical means that we will also receive from our partners. thank you hey, valentyna, i hope that the support you talked about will really only increase and, according to our western partners , there will be specific actions to support ukraine that will lead to ukraine being able to defend itself more effectively against russian navaly valentyn glykh, a political analyst of the public organization slovo i dilo, was with us on a

direct video link and he believes that russia just wants to waste time and that i do not want to achieve any kind of peace at the moment, friends. will appear here in this studio in a few minutes, wait, we are coming back in the liberation of the city of denys, support is already waiting, a miracle, volunteers and neighbors are ready to lend a shoulder even at work, people are not they work as they work, it is a very united people where the lost cannot be returned we will create a new one, i really want to be next to ukraine, to demand people between ukrainians, we help, we win the border

of freedom, the border of dignity, the border of humanity, the border of invincibility, the border of victory, the state border service of ukraine, the primacy of the honor of civilians, the destruction of civilian buildings forced mobilization, abduction of civilians, rape , torture, this is the most serious international crime, which does not have a statute of limitations, the document is timely and correctly submit your testimony, photo, video, physical evidence to the national police of ukraine, we will punish the aggressor together, the rules of a warm country, healthy

care, cool but not cold at home, thank you for what you are wearing