and you, i beg you to influence, this is a very unfortunate statement, you know, unfortunately, hungary has repeatedly made such or similar statements, and you know, i have talked with my hungarian colleagues. i told them one thing that if you want to change your image in the world, just try to follow the example of such countries as, e.e., estonia, like poland in terms of helping ukraine and this will change the attitude of the whole world of all democratic countries towards you, but i want to note that despite such statements, and as we remember, they were also made repeatedly to hungary they tried to slow down the aid to ukraine, but everything still ended with a happy ender, because in the end, we succeed, the european union, our allies succeed in persuading hungary to change its position, but you know, well, this is really a

systemic topic, and we need to work with hungary here hungary is not exactly a happy country, for example, it doesn’t help us with weapons, as it didn’t help us. so genratsa now and now says that she doesn’t even help with finances, even though the logic was at least somehow clear at the time and they said that we don’t want there escalations, we don't want people to die from these weapons, but he, well, from this money, on the contrary, people will not die there, on the contrary, they will receive support, but it is nevertheless still going on some kind of blockade and it is possible. well, some kind of strategic line should already be built in ukraine about her position, that's exactly p- personally, about the seat there , about viktor orbán, about the minister of finance, let varga know about the course of the current hungarian government, but so far i, well, i have not seen any strategic strategic line of our policy regarding the hungarian government, please. well, we are trying to influence hungary and we are trying

to make sure that our allies also exert some influence on hungary's behavior and it is successful, but you know that it is a very difficult country . for example, i tried to understand why they do not provide us with weapons that we need, they say so, some of their representatives say that we do not have weapons, but we provide financial assistance through some funds, but this is clearly not enough , let's say frankly, this is not enough, and you know i i can only express my personal, very subjective point of view. in general, i believe that those countries that undermine transatlantic solidarity , and that try to play along with the aggressor state, then the question of excluding such countries from the european union, from nato, well, that's mine. well

, actually your personal opinion, i would like us to have some kind of agreed opinion of the ukrainian government, the ukrainian president, the ukrainian government, the parliament. in general, this is exactly what i was asking. thank you for this optimistic answer. for money, we will have enough without these eight, because it is a critical sum of 18 billion euros, and if hungary resists, you know, we will win in any case , i have no doubts, it is only a question of price. that is, it will be much more difficult for us, we understand this, especially in the sense of economics. i am sure that our allies, our friends, they will never leave ukraine to their own devices, and i will make such a prediction after all. i believe that despite hungary's position today, it will be possible to convince it and we will receive this amount. that is, it is mine forecast and we will see whether it will come true or not, thank you, mr. oleksandr, for the inclusion and work

oleksandr merezhko, people's deputy of ukraine, chairman of the verkhovna rada committee on foreign policy, inter-parliamentary cooperation, well, now we will look at another interesting location on the map of our continent and the language will talk about the brewing conflict again in the church and kosovo. in particular, i would just like to remind you that the tension has escalated after mr. kurti announced last week that the government is continuing to introduce decision on license plates from november 1 although he said that the plan will be implemented gradually , there is already concern on the part of the north atlantic alliance, nato secretary general janstoutenberg called on the leaders of serbia and kosovo to refrain from unilateral actions that could lead to further escalation of tensions in kosovo and in connection with the studio nataliya ishchenko

project manager balkan columnist greetings ms. natalya thank you for joining the broadcast good afternoon i can say right away that despite warnings from nato, after all, unilateral steps have already been taken by the kosovo serbs, the serbs decided to leave all the authorities, all the institutions of kosovo, before that they were also represented in the parliament, in the government and in local administrations, in the court, in the prosecutor's office, in the police, that's how the serbs who live in kosovo came out demonstratively from absolutely all the institutions of e, which first brought into question the legitimacy of these institutions of kosovo in general, because it was written everywhere that there is a quota for serbs, and on the other hand, the north of the kosovar, where they mainly live

there were serbs and, accordingly, there were a lot of serbs in the authorities. well, there was no court , no prosecutor's office and no police, in general , that is, the situation looks very tense now, and hmm , there are already not only statements, but also reactions, for example, the european union sent there of additional law enforcement officers in kosovo, the action of the european union's law enforcement mission on everything is for him, the head of the country's foreign ministry and from the tasks, according to him, berlin and paris have proposed their own project for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, according to which the republic of kosovo will become a member of the un without formal knowledge from belgrade, but serbia has no intention of recognizing the country's independence and there are rumors that the security of serbia is important to us unanimously

came to the conclusion that this proposal of germany and france is unacceptable in this respect to the point that the independence of kosovo is already a resolved issue, but we do not accept it, commented the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of serbia on mrs. nataliya only 2%, well, according to the official information of the citizens of kosovo, they are ethnic serbs, they really live in the north . well, but 2%. well, it is within the limits of a statistical error. i would say, i'm sorry, maybe it's not quite appropriate for people, this phrase is a statistical error to use. do you think there may or may be an immediate and military escalation along the belgrade line, a crack, please, do you know

that there will certainly not be any deployment of a full-scale military conflict because kosovo has been in uh since 99 in the early 2000s, there is a nato contingent, nato peacekeepers, the keyford force, and they will definitely be there to warn and fight against all manifestations of violence from any side, that is, it will definitely not happen, but the escalation is such a local a-a clash of certain groups of people, certain people, some protest actions, which as if they were peaceful, and then some kind of violence happened, but because of this threat, and just realizing this is this risk factor, the european union strengthened the law enforcement forces, and they sent italian carabinieri there to so that such an outbreak of violence, which could

threaten stability and security, that is, that it does not happen, but on the other hand, i keep saying that after february 24, absolutely nothing can be ruled out in europe; in the end, it is not for nothing that serbia keeps a huge military contingent along the demarcation line with kosovo throughout time is conducting training and recently they announced that the troops were brought to combat readiness and they have already demonstrated what this means, they shot down a commercial drone that flew past one military base or another military facility, they they didn't explain, they didn't give details, but in the no-fly zone, there had never been such a thing as drones going astray, but the serbs demonstrated that they were serious. a

few days ago, they took out fighter jets on combat patrols , too. this has not happened since the days of hostilities, that is, on the one hand, there are no rational reasons for the war. well, there is no rational reason for the war at all, and yet it cannot be ruled out. such paradoxical things were personally in kosovo, in prishtina, in ghosts in kyiv. in the year 99 and saw this continent. i don't know what kind of ford it is in now, because if you remember the 94th year of rwanda, there was also the un continent there, but that did not prevent the residents of this roland from ethnically destroying a million other residents of randa and god forbid that a similar story could repeat itself in kosovo where the majority of the serbs are the

majority of the consular albanians and they are quite determined to preserve their own sovereignty since the days of their struggle for this independence kosovo, but where is the ukrainian history, the ukrainian trace in this history, why do you think ukraine, unlike the usa, unlike most of the european union countries, has not yet recognized the independence of kosovo, and should it be done now? the current aggravation would not have been possible without russia's attack on ukraine, when russia unleashed this full-scale war and serbia decided that, well, one can do it . context in general ukrainians who are there for a reason in the student when he talks about kosovo he

always gives a summary of the events of the front of the russian-ukrainian war, what did you understand , for example buchach goes to a press conference not allegedly about the topic of kosovo and tells about the combat situation around kherson that he believes that the development of the situation in the balkans also depends on the hostilities in ukraine and this is such a context regarding and you do not think that it really depends and you know it depends 100%, but not in such a context as presented by the president of serbia do you understand, that is, russia has its own interests in the balkans, and they are of course related to what it is doing in ukraine, but still not directly , that is, if the ukrainians succeed in liberating

kherson and the kherson region, this does not mean that immediately russia will help serbia more to protect the spit. neither here nor linear. as they say, dependence is not the kind that he talks about in the apprenticeship, he shows it all the time. it seems that he is just inciting passions in order to scare everyone. what if... i will not put pressure on the albanians in kosovo, no matter what they were saying that there will be a war. it seems to me that this is more of a speculation, are we really in direct contact with depending on mrs. natalya, that if putin succeeds in buying half of ukraine, then he will be able to take over all of kosovo as well, but that's what i said that they have already started rattling their weapons, e.e.,

to exterminate, to raise to combat patrols, this means that they really somehow perceived the events in ukraine , e. the position in this is very complicated, you understand. i keep saying that our strategic partners have recognized kosovo, they now call for negotiations and compromises, but in kosovo it is recognized by the americans and the british and the poles, who just yesterday announced that they are establishing consular relations between warsaw and with a pimple-ridden poland, that is, the interaction and where ukraine looks like a white crow here, but it seems that drastic

steps cannot be taken here either, because precisely according to the plan you mentioned, the countries of the european union, which did not recognize kosovo, they may recognize it in the near future, and it is precisely in this party that recognition is possible . ukraine has found its place and has also joined, because that is a possible option. ugh, well, mrs. natalie, in the end, we already talked to you and explained our views to the tv audience. why not? to follow the fables of russian propaganda, they say that in kosovo, the same type of thing was determined, and crimea was determined in the same way, which was carried out . in principle, any variant of the development of events is beneficial to serbia in order to, as you said, have for indulgence this ukrainian-russian talent in order

to, in principle, move in bikosovo even with aggression, don't you know, of course, logic does not work because russian propaganda in the balkans promotes thesis from crimea - this is russia, kosovo is serbia, that is, it is absolutely not unrelated, serbia itself says that it cannot recognize crimea because this will be a precedent for the recognition of kosovo, that is, serbia itself has an absolutely different logic and, accordingly, there is russian propaganda ah, so to speak, with a completely opposite thesis, and here we can say that russian propaganda will twist us absolutely to its side, whatever else is happening. it's just a point to flip the snow on your head, anything, and

it's really dangerous. it seems absurd funny, but they take into account the very powerful influence of russian propagandists and, in general, the influence of hybrid russian in serbia, this is very dangerous, and in fact, there is no solution to remove this danger. there is no, but the desire of serbia to get rid of this hybrid information propaganda influence and in fact there is not a very strong pressure from the european union and the west for the service to do it after all thank you nataliya ishchenko project manager of the balkan observer was in direct contact with the studio and i had one story before connecting valentyna nalivaichenko in 1999, we just went to kosovo and in local cafes where our group of journalists always ate, they always asked us if we were not russians, because half of them were all

half of the ukrainians spoke russian, and always when the ukrainians heard it, all of them were ok and ok, we will bring you food now, but once a waiter asked about the iq of ukrainians, what is your relationship with russians, and here our colleague from zvidana e reuters said the next and tuk-like e-e service and creations as well as the serbs and the croats who just finished the war between themselves, this was serhiy karadiy and then the waiter not only brought us her food but also brought 50 g of crayfish each and for free if like the serbs with the croats then you can drink eat how do you want this is simply the attitude of ordinary cursors to the serbs, well, that is, there is enough, well, tough, i will skip in a word, it seems to me that this is an absolutely comprehensive description of the situation of this location valentin nalyvaichenko, people's deputy of ukraine, former head of the security service of ukraine, contact us p valentina, congratulations, glory to ukraine, negotiations as a

diplomat in the past. in the past, there was no secret service, yes, that is, recognition, what is your personal position, the possible political position of your political force what should be the position of the ukrainian parliament and the president and the government regarding the recognition of kosovo, well, briefly please, as members of the european union, we now have a position that completely coincides with the european union, that is, with brussels and the european commission , we recognize that the rights of the kosovars to self-determination are, at the same time, territorial integrity and other issues should be resolved by each country without interference. at the same time, it is clear that ukraine does not recognize the secession of kosovo because crimea because we are now in this war we protect our territorial integrity from fake referendums from the aggressor and so on . the difference between kosovo and crimea is inhabited by the nation eh, and crimea is

inhabited by who and what. well, i say that our current position is a matter of 100%. and here's what's the matter, it's definitely true. thank you, we can get closer to you, the negotiations , because there are a lot of informational reasons related to these. it has already been noted that the publication writes a politician. most likely, zelensky has changed his position regarding the need to change the regime of the russian federation before as to sit down at the negotiating table with this country, this allegedly happened after the visit of biden's adviser sullivan, the position of ukraine and the president is still firm and unshakable, but the need to replace putin with someone else is no longer mentioned. it is only the good will of our country that they include the concept of goodwill on our part, the devil

knows, and emmanuel macron declares that at some point such a person will have to return to the table negotiations with russia, but the conditions should be dictated by ukraine. it seems to me that somehow the world of nato has turned around a lot around the topic of negotiations and efforts to conduct them as soon as possible. it does not seem to you to be true, and i will tell you what is behind the latest statements made by the russian foreign ministry yesterday regarding the alleged are ready for negotiations, only a voluntary ukraine is needed behind this is that in a week, the big twenty will meet and 19 leaders of the countries with the largest economic and defense and other potential will definitely e for the russian federation, the creation of huge problems is the first and most important - it is economic relations, it is the fact that at the beginning of december, for example, the embargo on russian oil to the

european union will begin to operate, and russia and putin personally understand that in the event that the g20 support the eu embargo on oil issues in a week - this is the end of the russian economy, this is the end of the putin regime and this is the end of the war, there is no need for sad things, moreover, russia has already lost more than 30% of the gas market of the european union, this is what they will never return, for 50 years they sought to be on the european gas market in such volumes and lost all this due to aggression in ukraine, and this is not all the positions of china, germany, and in the near future, changes in the positions of brazil and india may finally affect the fact that the russian the federation will not only drop out of the top 20, but will also lose, in principle, the ability, i repeat , to finance its own regime, hundreds of thousands

of its own punitive bodies and security forces in the russian federation. and all this russian army mobilization and so on, which has now been stopped by our armed forces, and as for the fact that the american radik sullivan from national security was coming, this was preceded by only one success of the armed forces of ukraine , but who does not bring peace closer than the power and successes of our armed forces and that constant pressure and counteroffensive both in the east and in the south of our country. this is all in the aggregate and forces even the russian federation, even their leadership, to admit that they are losing this war and at least they are somehow trying to bring it into the plane or something negotiations, do you just know how to take at least some kind of break, pause, in order to at least somehow maintain the positions that they temporarily occupied? the question is what should be our position regarding the probable beginning of the probable negotiations and with what

positions we should approach them at the beginning and with which and with what plan for the final of these negotiations, the armed forces of ukraine have the first position for themselves, everything that can be done now for them and for the sake of our defense power can be done both inside the country and within the framework of the anti-putiv coalition of this rammstein group and not only the strengthening of the armed forces with everything possible, especially anti-aircraft anti-missile defense defense systems, this is the number one issue , the number two issue is the energy security of the country . to provide the necessary equipment to our energy companies and every day to restore and rebuild, first of all, the energy infrastructure, the supply of heat and light to our citizens from lviv to kharkiv,

including in kyiv and beyond. the third is international efforts and position. well, president zelenskyi absolutely clearly and adequately voices the conditions. the first is the withdrawal of all occupying forces. punishment of all military and war criminals and compensation for all damages caused by the russian federation from buchi, beginning with the massacre and ending in mariupol and kherson and all other cities where the russian army, the russian military has committed and continues to commit crimes against humanity. i think that this position is not just a victim, it is an object, and it is very important that the president of france has already supported it, that it is ukraine that cannot and will not be resolved without ukraine. the united states always takes this position occupied great britain also japan also

this as e p igor, i will give you a list of those countries of the g20 whose leaders will gather at the ball in a week, it will be the same leaders, the same macron, the same schultz, the same leadership of china who have been re-elected for five years, you already know such big global processes, and the most important thing for us, for ukrainians, is to understand that such a position, and in the event that it is formed by the 19th leaders of the g20, it is, you know, such a backlash against putin on his regime and they will no longer be able to do anything, the main thing is that the positions of the east and the west in the literal sense of the word at this summit converge at least on the most fundamental issues. by the way, a consensus seems to have been reached on the issue of using nuclear weapons on the continent at least the processes were signaled all day and night to mr. scholz, one last question, mr. valentina,

the general staff informs that belarus together with the russian federation are forming a grouping of troops, it is not news for us that they are regularly stretching there, that they can stretch , they are doing it slowly, but in the context of the weapons that are located there threat, everything that remains in your opinion is a threat of an attack from the north or exclusively an attack on our north from the territory of belarus, i will tell you what is actually happening on the territory of belarus, especially the military towns which the belarusian regime provided the russian mobilized ones because there are mass diseases, pneumonia , stomach infections and other times and this is already a problem, you know how even hospitals and hospitals in belarus are not enough to treat these 1000 mobilized people brought there and now it is not in the best weather conditions, it is in kyiv today, little girl, believe me it is already much colder for me in belarus, and problems are piling up with the fact that these same russians are mobilized, you know

, the whole motlock in the russian federation is not just gathered, it is people from a rather large criminal past, and now the contradictions between the belarusian military and the russian mobilized already reach crisis phenomena, for example, the military or the police of belarus or the militia, as it is called there, cannot get order even around military towns, this is that drinking is a competition, raping others, committing a crime already on the territory of belarus itself against those belarusians who still doubted whether it was a union state or not union with the russian federation, the russian military brought them the chaos of disease and the spread of criminality on the territory of belarus itself , they cannot do anything about it, the third thing that is accumulating on the territory of belarus is accumulating on the territory of belarus absolutely unable to fight reservists are being mobilized, russian and large military e-e, there is no change in this. at the same time,

military equipment, ammunition, which the russians exported and are exporting from the territory of belarus, they go to the east and to the south, where our armed forces, i remind you, are again squeezing the enemy, and there russia is trying to patch up the holes, in any case, with armored vehicles and shells from belarus, from their arsenals, which have remained since soviet times, there is no military power in total, there are huge problems of threats, so there are airfields and other infrastructure that lukashenko provided to the russian federation to the aggressor from february 24, and for now they can use it. and it is very important, i put it if possible our last group, the north of our armed forces of ukraine, is already in a completely different combat condition, and the enemy understands that neither volyn nor zhytomyr oblast, nor kyiv oblast, they will enter as they are tried to do in february of this year very concisely,

you are the former ambassador of ukraine to belarus. in your opinion, should we recognize the government of svitlana tikhanovskaya, it is the united government headquarters, what did she call on the ukrainian authorities about ? lukashenka should be recognized as an illegitimate leader of belarus, it is indeed more than a co-aggressor, as an accomplice in the war crimes of putin and his regime against ukraine. thank you , valentin nalyvaichenko, people's deputy of ukraine the former head of the security service of ukraine, as well as the former ambassador of ukraine to the republic of belarus, on this we say goodbye to yehor thank you for the broadcast. thank you for watching us for the last five hours. well, the news will continue to work, and on eva melnyk i will present updated information. i ask for the word greetings, colleagues thank you for your work , the news editor will work on the most important thing at the moment and i will start with the situation