it is not excluded that these military movements will be supported by the same handsome man with a cadre and will lead them and a proper military junta will be established after these revolutionary events, but in any case, i believe that the main threat to putin's regime is precisely what is being formed now in the ukrainian at the front, among all the mobilized malcontents who are being thrown to their deaths, information has just appeared that the minister of defense of the russian federation, serhii shoiguna, said to withdraw the troops to the left bank of the dnieper and withdraw from on the right bank of the dnieper, let's hear it. i agree with your views and proposals. the real life of the health of the russian servicemen is always a priority. we must take into account the threats to the civilian population. make sure that all the desired numbers of the civilian population

were able to leave. proceed to this with the troops and take all measures to ensure the safe transfer of personnel and equipment from greece to the dnieper should be said to shoigu. he turned to serhiy surovikin, this is the commander of the occupation forces on of the territory of the ukrainian state, what did surovikin say that the city of kherson and the settlements adjacent to it cannot be supplied with energy and function , the most correct solution in this situation is necessary. just now they have already recorded that there is nothing for them to do on the right bank, how will these decisions affect it?

in fact, it was clear at least in july and that it finally reached the russian generals. well, in fact, i think that, of course, this decision was made by putin, it’s not syroitin. decision they never dared to declare about this is the decision putin was informed about the catastrophic situation with logistics, we are talking about it. well, i am saying that since july, they said that if the russians wanted to preserve their group, what were they talking about today, because they did it in july months, it would be better for them. that way they will lose a huge number of personnel. moreover, i will emphasize that on the right bank of the dnieper in the kherson region there was and is still a significant group, at different times there were up to 20,000 troops, now it is impossible to say for sure, but we will see

according to the dynamics of the development of events, up to 20,000 well- trained personnel of the units and so on , including the landing troops and the contract workers, that is , even more. were, but now to what will happen now, they made the decision to withdraw, but i am not sure that all the e-e troops will be able to do this under constant fire control and retreat routes and all crossings by the armed forces of ukraine, that is, until recently, they continued battles, for example, the snigurivka snigurivka is the most northern point, which is quite far from the crossings, and i very much doubt that the personnel who for some reason believed their commanders, and i mean the armed forces of the russian federation, continued to put garbage behind

those idiotic decisions that were made and uh, from the point of view of military affairs, were absolutely not unprofessional now. i am sure that those who are now, for example, in snyurivka or in other garrisons who are in positions who tried to keep the line of defense far enough away from the crossings they will mostly be destroyed. well, in any case, i don't think that they will be allowed to leave easily now and calmly cross the dnipro. this is a rather difficult operation, which i am sure the armed forces of ukraine will not allow to carry out as easily as this it sounded in his words, although it seems to me that he also hesitated and understood that he now carries a beacon , what will happen next after the clearing of the right bank, the front will be fixed along the dnieper for the ukrainian army, this is a rather positive development

of events, now the ukrainian army will be able to use those powerful forces, those are very well-prepared forces that were used and used in our country in the kherson direction. in other directions , since during the stabilization of this front, the ukrainian army is not worth it. i think it is not necessary to prepare before the fording of the dnieper in this area, especially since there will be a fairly significant group of russian troops there. we have already seen that they were building three lines of defense and so on , so there is no point in carrying out any operations to ford the dnieper, which are now more important directions are the same, melitopol, mariupol is the direction of the luhansk region of donetsk, that is , now, the decisive moment of the war actually begins.

now the ukrainian army can concentrate without being distracted to the south, and i will remind you that the southern direction was one of the most important and it was the southern a-a direction that could turn ukraine into a state without a sea, could unite transnistria, occupied odessa, for example, mykolaiv further through e- e dnipro all the way from the territory of russia and thus with the occupied crimea and thus completely cut off ukraine from the sea it would be a geopolitical disaster for ukraine and of course a geopolitical geopolitical triumph of russia and when they failed to carry out these operations from the offensive on mykolaiv, i am not talking about odesa, the crash on the island, the snake crash with the missile cruiser moscow, all these were stages of this

catastrophic development of events, and the last one was approved today the latest decision that puts a risk under all the geopolitical and military-strategic plans of russia about cutting off ukraine from the sea, now the ukrainian army can concentrate on other directions that are already more localized, the front becomes much smaller because well, after all, we are now talking about huge territories, if it says to move to the left bank, in fact, these are huge territories that held very large ukrainian efforts. by the way, the shelling of mykolaiv will obviously decrease because it is diverted the front is as far as the dnipro , but i can predict. unfortunately, now kherson and the right bank of the kherson region will be the most under russian

fire because now they will obviously start shelling the ukrainians from the left bank of the dnipro territories on the right bank of the kherson region. well , information has also appeared from viktoria sumar, a people's deputy of ukraine. she writes that it became known from a few close people that the snow maiden was released, but she writes that these are only my sources in the armed forces of ukraine well, let's wait for official announcements about this, i think that tomorrow the general staff will definitely tell us something about this p. mykhailo, let's put an end to it. thank you for participating in the program. this is mykhailo , he was a military expert himself, our program continues next, friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our social networks on youtube and facebook. for those who are currently watching us on youtube, please like this video and subscribe to our youtube channel. well, you can become a sponsor of

our youtube channel. -channel under this stream there is a button to sponsor, join the sponsors of our e-e youtube channel, any help is important to us. well, next we have oleksandr khare, an expert on the center's foreign and security policy , on the air of defense strategies, mr. oleksandr. good day to you. good health to you. i am glad to see you on the air. sergey, i am also glad to see her good news from the kharkiv direction and literally just now. this is reassuring news. but it is clear that it gives us the opportunity to save the lives of our civilians and military personnel and to start cleaning up in other directions. let's actually start our conversation with the retreat of the russian army from the right bank to the left bank.

that is, the russian army is fleeing from kherson oblast, which it has been holding for the last eight months, what does this mean for the russians, what does it mean for us, well , speaking from the point of view of foreign policy, literally this week there were several articles that hinted at that that ukraine should show good will and willingness to negotiate with the russians about the end of this war, and there were also opinions that ukraine's victory in the liberation of kherson could be the limit after which ukraine would have a stronger position in order to talk with the russians and what we saw. it seems to me that our president did the right thing. he could not help but listen to the advice of our primarily american colleagues. moreover, i want to clarify that we had such

concern in our media that we are being pushed a little. they are forcing him to say that we are ready to conduct some negotiations, it is clear that at this stage it is absolutely impossible for me, but by and large the idea was for zelensky to say something that would appease our primarily european partners, which is everything. well, somehow he amuses himself with the thought that it is possible to agree on something with putin and putin's russia, and in fact he did a very correct thing - he said that we are ready to negotiate there, even if the hell is there, yes. and the most important condition is the liberation of all territories and unconditionally this reparations unconditionally this is the prosecution of all those who committed war crimes and it is certain that in such a formula there is no possibility to talk with putin, there is no possibility to talk with this regime and actually we do not see any there are no signs from their side regarding the victory today, maria zakharova said that they are ready to talk

if kyiv agrees to the situation that has developed , that is, it means the illegal annexed territories and now a certain part of the occupied territories is illegal, but as you understand , oleksandr, now we will show the audience what she said as maria zakharova said, she crossed out once more that it was once a-a somehow probably. open negotiations we have never refused them, we are ready to lead, you understand, taking into account the realities that are emerging at the moment, and we are coming well, that's how she simply

answered in the style of kvn, or maybe clowns, i would say it like that, it's better suited, we know that two days ago volodymyr zelenskyy publicly stated and named five conditions under which negotiations are possible: restoration of territorial integrity of ukraine, respect for the un charter, payment of compensation for tasks during the war, damages, punishment of all those guilty of crimes and provision of guarantees that the war will not it will be repeated yesterday, the deputy minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation, my namesake rudenko, said that they have no special requirements for negotiations, although in social networks they found a tweet of mr. rudenko, not me, a russian , who on february 27 said that there were two conditions for negotiations with ukraine, this is identification, demilitarization, these are two points, they are already disappearing from the agenda of russian diplomacy , or i don’t know how to call them correctly,

serving russian diplomacy, and why are they like that very quickly got blown away by these demands that they constantly declared denazification demilitarization why well, you know, first of all we have to say such perhaps quite philosophical things that for russia everything is war and actually putin governs governed his state as a special operation this total propaganda is definitely murder of dissenters is blackmail, bribery. that is, it is such a tool. well, definitely aggressive actions in relation to the outside world, and therefore any thing. for example , for ukraine, diplomacy is really not an opportunity by armed means, to find some kind of understanding, to find some kind of compromise, uh, points of contact for russia, diplomacy exclusively, and by the way, this is not only about putin, let's remember the times of the

bolsheviks, and in fact, when lenin agreed to the first world war, and then there were several defeats they signed these agreements temporarily because they understood that they could not do something by force, seize this territory or control something there, actually nothing has changed for them diplomacy is a smoke screen behind which they they want to prepare in order to finally solve the ukrainian question, by the way, we have to use this phrase as at one time the nazis used it against the jews, because it is certain that in the political consciousness of the ruling class and a large number of russians, the ukrainian question must be solved finally so that there are no ukrainians here, there must be khokhlas that is, those who will be there will entertain them with their songs, and we will once again remember this uh, the main propagandist of the russian federation of the semenians. and what did she want to walk like there to the godfathers and the sword, what a moonlit night to sing,

that is, all this is completely normal in their heads, the second extremely important point is arranged, which is the success of our armed forces and our society in general in countering this aggression, and of course that they cannot impose anything on us by force of arms and they are trying to shake the unity of the west if with the united states - it does not work out i am absolutely clear or for president biden the issue of ukraine is fundamental, it is in fact his such a legacy is a foreign policy legacy that he wants to see in the history textbooks that he defended democracy, and, in fact, against not only the russian federation, but also china and north korea, all these anti-democratic forces , in fact, it does not work with the americans, it works partially with the europeans, and we saw that last week, macron declared that he believes that any war ends with negotiations and actually he would like to see that yes, but he later corrected himself and said that it

is exclusively up to ukrainians to decide when and under what conditions to enter into such negotiations. i'm not saying it anymore, let's not mention it, but the smear is recent, er, it means er, the holy see, er, the pope of rome declared, er, that actually, er, russians are not such izbergs, they are not capable of torturing , killing. well, that's all we looked into the eyes of irpeni and , in fact, in any town freed from katsaps . and today, by the way, he said about the fact that wars never end with weapons, they are childish to hope for weapons, although in fact world war i and world war ii did not end with the diplomacy of the saint the throne is by force of arms, the russians are actually trying to shake the europeans, first of all this

weak lanka, so far it is not visible the readiness of the europeans to act on this because they understand the conditions have not yet been met and that is why we will hear such people on the one hand will try that we have never been against dialogue we are ready, but the ukrainians must buy the situation that has changed, that is, accept the fact that we have lost the territory of the people, destruction, destruction. of non-aligned status i don't know how they will formulate the numbers there definitely that this is not good will it is definitely not a step of diplomacy definitely that we do not need to take this seriously but we should take seriously how we communicate these things to our partners especially weak ones blank sheet in europe, and that's why it seems to me that it 's quite simple here, it's obvious on the surface, and listen , you correctly said that this is not a diplomat, and they are propagandists a long, long time ago, and they

actually engage in distortion, they engage lies and they are in no way capable of conveying any opinion and making any compromises, since lavrov is a member of putin's inner circle, and what happened on february 24 was absolutely a surprise to him. well, let's hope that with him you can to talk something and then he will bring putin a ready-made solution with ukraine. well, we have no opportunity for that. the war continues, uh, now this is such psychological pressure on our european partners. well, another psychological pressure is the visit of patrushev, secretary of the security council of the russian federation to tehran as reported by the russian propaganda agency tas, today patroshev flew to iran and began a visit and planned russian-iranian consultations, as they say in tas, on security with the participation of experts of the security councils and representatives of a number of ministries and departments of the two countries serhiy zgurets

, director of the information consulting company di-fance express in veteri express said that the fact that the official authorities of the russian federation confirmed the visit of the soviet union to the russian federation indicates that this is a joint signal to the collective event that the alliance is between russia and the wounds that there will be weapons , we know that now the issue of supplying ballistic missiles, e.e., iranian ballistic missiles to russia is being discussed quite actively, since russia has already used up a large stock of its ballistic missiles, not only and they are looking for a partner, can iran become e it is a partner of russia, just like belarus , and to create a kind of axis of evil, that is, russia, iran, belarus. well, they are already like that. i would not say that belarus is a partner - it is a satellite , in fact, an appendage of the russian federation, and iran

it turned out that it has much greater power and the ability to produce modern weapons and ballistic missiles, and most importantly, these drones , of course, it is a visit-potrasheva, it is so, let's say, to ensure the uninterrupted supply of all this scrap metal to the russian federation , it is completely understandable and here is a very, very interesting thing like this again after all, it’s a little abstract, all totalitarian or authoritarian regimes are lying, and we saw how they lied in the square when they shot down a ukrainian civilian plane recently, and then they had to to admit that there was evidence of the development of this miracle, now they are lying so far that they gave these drones to combat before the start of the company's army, but in fact we have evidence that there are numbers and details that were there in february

actually created that it is that it is not so that it is a lie and definitely that is why we can conclude that in the near future there will indeed be ballistic missiles but on the other hand i understand that it will be the destruction of ukraine it will be a danger to our citizens it is clear but on the other hand it is may to be an additional step for our partners in front of the united states, to slightly revise the restrictions , the very restrictions they imposed on themselves. or drones to actually hit the platform into which these rockets are launched. and by the way, belarus could be a very good target here, since the americans think that it is not necessary. weapons were on russian territory, well, belarus, russian territory there, and actually this is the biggest threat

, well, to all of kyiv, as well as strategic for us , for us, let’s say yes, to the channels of weapons supply from the territory of poland, therefore it is definitely extremely important for us to keep our space safe and our infrastructure and our roads and our lines of communication, so it seems to me that actually this could be the reason for the further escalation of the review of these positions, we have to work on this, there is a certain consensus in the expert environment the american has i hope that there were also arguments from the ukrainian side during the visit to kyiv of national security adviser jake selyvan, he is actually the architect of these systems of deterrence in relation to ukraine, that is, why they cannot hand over to us under what conditions, it seems to me that this mountain can lead to more weapons, which can, so to speak, reduce

risks in the future. air defense because there are not enough capacities for additional production, this is the explanation for the refusal of military supplies to ukraine. by the way, this is the first time that the israeli authorities have heard it. because earlier israel said that we will maintain neutrality, well, considering russia's contacts with iran , how much is this scarf israel's balance of neutrality has already tipped well, i understand from certain hints and the president of ukraine and our officials that some kind of cooperation is not happening and i think that it is not only the exchange of intelligence and data maybe these are some anti-drone systems, of course, who but the israelis know better what the iranians are cooking in the gas station, but i don’t think that

anything can fundamentally change, literally on the eve of the elections, he said that it would not be right to give the ukrainians some weapons that could end up in bad years and by the way, he spoke about himself first of all, because at one time er-er means israel after 2008 by the russian company of the russian invasion of georgia, where the georgians showed the ability and effectiveness of using israeli drones and the russians turned to the israelis to buy drones and create a joint production. actually , the israelis hesitated for a long time, and then they decided to set a condition that russia would not supply the s300 system, which at one time was the position in 2007, iran bought it and on these conditions gave them an old those drones that were no longer armed with the forces of israel, but it turned out in such a way that after a certain time these drones took part in the attack on israel

, that is, they fell into the hands of the iranians, and actually bibi certainly wants not to repeat his a mistake and not to annoy putin, of course he is trying to play let's say yes to these to the conflict of interests. well, you can understand here. they are in such an environment that national interests are above all and all humanitarian issues . and even the fact that the president is of jewish origin ukraine became the person of the year in completely israeli publications, it was not the reason that actually they looked at this policy, so i wouldn't expect anything drastic. we have other directions where we have to work primarily for the liberation of the united states, but also other countries, we need to look at south korea to see how many wonderful weapons they are going

to buy, our neighbors the poles have already signed contracts with south korea and they actually have everything american. sometimes it is better because it is refined there. is more important to us than israel, and to hope that someone will do such charity towards us more than we have seen so far, well, this is hardly reasonable. in the end, i will ask you very briefly with about the elections in the united states of america, where the house of representatives, a third of the senate , legislative assemblies and governors in many states are chosen, how much the balance of power can change in proportions, i mean more republicans and democrats, and whether this will affect the assistance of the united states of america to ukraine. immediately, of course, this will not affect, since there is money that has already been allocated to these administrations, of course, there is also the

voted langlist, who was voted for two years, that is, all these things are not president biden will be able to use, by the way, now the most interesting thing is that i am the senate, four seats remain so far, the votes are divided in half, i hope that what was until now will be preserved, that is, the control of the democrats over the senate, and in general , these elections have become more positive for ukraine than we expected in the sense that a large number. that is, it did not become such a red wave when the republicans simply came in and took, let's say, such a large majority in and in the compress and in the gubernatorial elections there why is it important, because on november 15, trump is going to announce that he is going to the elections in 2024, and of course, if there was a more positive result, it meant

a very good campaign now, because these midterm elections have become a kind of referendum on trump's trust and he actually won , in part, this party won, but how powerful is it. for certain, let's say, officials, it will be a signal to look at other candidates. and by the way, this is very interesting, this situation can turn around with the governor of florida, he is of italian origin, so the politician has actually won and he can compete with trump, he is traditional, such a true republican, not a populist, and it would certainly be good for ukraine if this trajectory were trumpian. went all the same, more into history, more textbooks, there are some political deviations, that's why, yes, but by and large, so far, well , the most important thing has not been resolved, because everything is a stick

of representatives and our beloved victoria spartaz got to the house of representatives, and it is certain that she will have the opportunity to conduct an investigation there, to make some inquiries, to tell something there, of course. sometimes they vote for important things, but for us, of course, the most important thing is the senate, and so far, libra and they are wavering, and so far, none the party did not prevail in it. thank you, mr. oleksandr, it was oleg of the peace of politics of the center of defense strategies. it was the program of the verdict about it. serhiy rudenko. i wish everyone a good evening and say goodbye to you. see you tomorrow until 17:10. goodbye. congratulations this is freedom, my name is vlad and azure, and today's issue is completely and completely, almost completely and completely. we decided to dedicate it