tv [untitled] November 9, 2022 6:30pm-7:01pm EET
6:30 pm
we love you we love you and yes supporters meet former us president donald trump and his wife melania at a polling station in the state of florida the trumps voted on november 8th this is a very important election i hope the right things happen and we all know that these election results have to show the impact has trump inside the republican party and among its voters, he previously announced a large statement by analysts - this is perceived as a hint that later trump will announce that will run again for the post of president in 2024. today we are discussing the midterm elections of the united states, but i also, er, cannot pass by the news that we receive in the context of the kherson region, as i said at the beginning, the commander of the russian troops in the war in ukraine, serhiy surovikin, offered the minister defense minister of russia sergei shoigu to withdraw troops from the kherson
6:31 pm
region to the left bank of the dnieper. literally an hour before that, reports appeared in the media. in particular, i am talking about the kremlin media . the so-called leaders of the occupation administration of kherson , kyrylo strumousov, who called himself the deputy head of the kherson regional administration, so far no one has officially confirmed this information, but there are such reports in the russian media, and one more piece of news, first of all, the head of the kherson region yaroslav yanushevich, he also did not comment in any way in the future, the further situation in the kherson region, but he asked to remain silent. and here, literally, volodymyr zelensky signed a decree on the creation of four military administrations on kherson oblast, kahiv oblast, holomativ oblast, and krestiv oblast, the relevant decree is already on the website of the head of state. i think that we will know and see more details about this in the future. i
6:32 pm
think that kherson is the next few hours. kherson will become a top topic, we are watching what is happening there. well, let's move on to the american elections the course of the american elections is also being monitored by our colleagues overseas, i mean the editors of the voice of america , we are joined by kateryna lisonova, a congressional correspondent of the voice of america katy my greetings i congratulate you, as always, glad to hear from you, katya, with what mood did the united states wake up today? hope, joy, disappointment, what the media write, what people with expectations say, because, ah, because the counting process is very tight now, and in fact, there are no 100% results, and that's why so far what can you say? silence and people are waiting for all the votes to be counted and, uh, in the key states, uh, the question is who will win the state is very close. that is, there are percentages from 50 to 40,
6:33 pm
six, uh, 51 to 49, approximately such differences they say but did i understand correctly that we still do not have 100% confidence that the senate will be in the senate, there will be a majority of republicans in the senate? well, i understand that there are certain certainties about the house of representatives, they are more. let's say it like that. about the senate, it's not clear here. the fact is that uh, this is one of the most uh-huh races in one of the most valuable mid -term elections for a long time. the majority of in other words , the republicans need to keep the current seats and win one seat. let me remind you that in canada there are only 100 representatives of the senators. 35 are currently being sorted. and
6:34 pm
the republic needs to keep all the seats they currently have and also fight back and win one more instead . in the house of representatives, there are 435 representatives in total. there you sort through all the representatives, and there the republicans need to keep the already existing seats and win back five more , that is, the competitions themselves are very close but as of now in the senate, at least according to the latest calculations, the democrats managed to win back one seat, and in fact, she is now one step ahead, although there are almost equal signs, but i will note that if, for example, in the senate, a situation of 50 50 for the final word will be according to kamala harris, the president's contract, and that's how it also gives a victory to the democrat, so according to experts, as of now, the senate more or less predicts what can be left for the democrats, but here the house of representatives is in great question
6:35 pm
because there are more representatives and more counting of votes. and is there already any reaction from the democrats to the results of these elections? congresses, the senate , maybe there are already some reactions a-and actually uh-uh actually there are no reactions of any uh-uh because because it is very smart to make any reactions or statements as of now because as of now the results are not obvious and as i already said said themselves the competition is very, very close and any statement may turn out to be premature and no one yet risks making any categorical winning statements but i will note that experts and journalists claim that such a big winning red wave is not yet visible and that's all is happening in very
6:36 pm
close races, so for now we can say that the democrats have better results than predicted before, and i also cannot help but ask about the prospect of further support for ukraine, and here are the most drastic statements regarding the revision of this support even the cancellation of this support came from the representative of the republican party, marjorie taylor green, she said that just four days ago, she said that if the republicans win the congressional elections, ukraine will not get a single penny, katya, and how many republicans hold such right-wing views uh, how many of them go to the congress, that is, republicans like my father, the lady i already mentioned, mrs. majora taylor green, it's actually hard, uh, to say for sure, because they haven't uh, uh, been counted in all votes, but just before the midterm elections, the
6:37 pm
voice of america had an interview with the former representative of america's results in ukraine, john heps, and he said that, in general, it is unlikely that at least in the house of representatives, it is unlikely that such right-wing radical publicists will gain 30% of the total number of republicans in the house of representatives. which would mean that they would be a minority among republicans in the house of representatives and an even more significant minority in congress in general, that is, they would represent a small minority and and and obviously not will represent the general position of the republican party. thank you very much. kateryna lisunova kondrashova, voice of america correspondent, was live on radio liberty. let's look at the plasma, it
6:38 pm
shows the results of voting for the house of representatives, and here we see that 174 votes are received by the democrats and 200 votes by the republicans. the republicans are ahead, i will remind you that if the republicans get a majority in the house of representatives, then the leader of the republicans will then become the speaker of the house of representatives and replace the one who is the most entrenched in this position. well, let's see what they tell us about the senate, eh, the preliminary results, the democrats get 46 seats so far and 47 what my colleague katya lisunova just said about the fact that the republicans are literally following each other closely and 47 seats are being won and for the majority it is necessary that one of these parties receive 101 votes because there are only 100 representatives in the senate. well, oleg chansur, ambassador of ukraine to the usa 2005-10, is already joining our broadcast. good evening. greetings, mr. chansur
6:39 pm
, did these elections become something unexpected and special for you? in principle, they did not become for in august, i was asked by special people to write an article for the mirror of the week, er, about this, that is, before the elections, and basically everything. well, maybe it was not fully implemented, but er, in principle, it turned out as it was supposed to, but really if we often have such a tendency to look for some special significance of influence on ukraine in events in other countries, sometimes in vain, just the elections in the united states for us in general, for ukraine will er have the opportunity to have it further, which can be more detailed, what significance can you have for a minute
6:40 pm
you yourself said that in august, in the month of august, you already wrote a column for the mirror of the week quite early, ukrainian society began to be interested. and what happened in the midterm elections, i thought that well, maybe it was too early, but in principle it was so useful for getting into the topic by the way, i listened very carefully to your correspondent, maybe i'll start by expressing my opinion well, first of all , of course, let's say there is no red wave we will not see
6:41 pm
the united states. just uh a democrat, then milya harisa, she again controls the scenario, apparently, the fate of the sonata can be decided even on december 6, when there will be additional elections in george, this is the only state with a majoritarian system, and that's where it will be decided who will have weight in the senate. it is important for us, again, i am not an american, but i do not fully agree with john erst, i agree in the sense that we have a common strategic interest, which is trying to
6:42 pm
help ukraine is big enough, it is 57 members of the house of representatives during the vote in may eh, of the law on eh 40 billion aid for ukraine eh, i think that at least this group will not become smaller , and maybe it will become larger and more active, and we should also pay attention to the fact that, judging by the statements of mccarthy and such, in principle, he is a supporter of ukraine as the future chairman of the foreign affairs committee , michael mccall, the problem of control of aid reporting for ukraine will be, and it cannot be ruled out that this group of neo-isolationists, who are under the influence of trump, will
6:43 pm
use this very argument and try, let's say, try to stop uh and reducing the amount of aid to ukraine is also very important for us, and this is now relevant and will be even more relevant, as well as the pace and honesty of receiving aid from the united states, that is, it will be necessary to be prepared that the conditions for working with the congress will be more difficult if and as i said, it is unlikely it will not happen when the republicans get control of the palace workers. i have a question for you in the context of aid. look, er, when we talk about aid for ukraine, this does not always mean a check written by the united states . america is not always money, this includes military aid, and if it is military aid
6:44 pm
, then it also includes orders for the military-industrial complex of the united states of america, low-level military enterprises that produce weapons that then go to ukraine, and i had to hear a lot from americanists such theses that, in fact, military aid for ukraine can be such a common point of contact for both republicans and democrats because , er, because, first of all, the military industrial complex of the united states is so large the lobbyist and i, first of all, do not want to quarrel with them. what do you think about this? it is unconditional that such a point of view has the right to life and to some extent it is absolutely true . it is precisely those who, again, are trying to limit aid to ukraine, precisely
6:45 pm
because the arguments are financial, because in order to order weapons, it is necessary to pay for them, that is, the logic is such that under the conditions when the country and i mean the united states is on the brink of a recession she cannot afford to allocate money and uncontrollably over aid to krita. this is absolutely a move on the line of argumentation, but this is roughly the way it is, that is, first of all, there is demobology here, there is neo and cessionism, but here it is also necessary to see that it is on the one hand, on the other hand, the republicans will definitely try to complicate life as much as possible in order to
6:46 pm
prevent his nomination and victory in the next presidential election, that is, the interweaving of demology and politics. indeed, the perception of a part of the republicans is that of the republican electorate of this is not the isolationist ideology of donald trump. you yourself mentioned donald trump . i actually just wanted to ask. in this context, many also believe that donald trump is currently one of the most powerful candidates from the republican party, even if you allow the great return of donald trump to american politics, in principle, not only i suppose i'll tell you that i, well, i've been
6:47 pm
consciously involved in the united states all my life, in principle, i follow all political election processes quite closely, and one of the distinguishing features of these midterm elections is the total participation of the former president. it is connected with the fact that er trump wants to er dream to carry out his re-incarnation not just to run for office again to become the president of the united states and in principle the opinion is expressed that somewhere around november 14th he can do the relevant statement is definitely on this is serious. to influence the results of the elections, if they were really such that they would provide a red wave and, in trump's hands, there would be all the necessary cards and
6:48 pm
means to make a very loud statement. about his return to big politics and his candidacy for the position of president. i think that a normal person drew certain conclusions that the quality of the candidates was quite low, especially the republican party despite the fact that these candidates were selected and supported by 94% of donald trump but knowing trump, this will certainly not be an argument for him, and i think that in the near future we will see trump's self-nomination of his candidacy. although i will make a certain caveat here, knowing donald trump, you cannot be
6:49 pm
100% sure about anything, thank you very much you joined our broadcast oleg shamshut ambassador of ukraine to the united states of america 2005-10 thank you very much well, in the context of kherson oblast, i have repeatedly mentioned during this broadcast that events are developing in parallel in kherson oblast literally just now, the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak, said that ukraine does not yet see signs that russia is leaving kherson without a fight . the key here is probably peace, well, many people the other day when information appeared that russia may leave kherson region in the near future, there is a lot rumors were heard about the possibility that it is only the russian forces who are currently creating the impression that they are leaving kherson region, but in fact there may still be battles ahead, we will follow this topic, the main topic of today's broadcast is the american elections but at the same time we will also discuss kherson. with our next speaker, oleg sahakyan, a political scientist
6:50 pm
will join our broadcast. and in washington and not only in washington, well , some surprises. i think that for no one who followed the american elections, it did not happen and probably should not have been expected, especially the only interesting thing is that it didn’t work now, judging by the previous data of the trembian sense, let’s say you took american parliamentarism from us, kuku, and not only there, in terms of governors, not everything is going well for them, some of the leaders of the race, let’s say, turned out not to be leaders in outsiders, and american society swept them along these there are no elections because of the results of these elections. and here, the only thing that can be attributed to uh is really not so much news as much as surprise as much as serious news is what about the results of these
6:51 pm
elections, trump is clearly not getting the results he expected and which would strengthen his position for entering the presidential election race, and accordingly the intrigue remains, let's say, in what condition the trumpists will approach the primaries within the republican party. if we talk about the balance between republicans and democrats, then plus or minus everything remains predictable in any case for ukraine the situation does not change ukraine does not lose the ukrainian majority any in both chambers of the american parliament any in both political forces, respectively, and bipartisan support remains where we can become hostages of the overall complication of the institutional and political process within the united states, and it is clear that the presence of trumpists and already trump's first calls for protests and almost no recognition of the electoral process, they say that this is a wave of populism from zionism.
6:52 pm
of course, i will not go anywhere and it will escalate, that is, all this will provoke a kind of withered political crisis in the average state and, accordingly, will inhibit all processes and here ukraine will be a hostage, but from this there is a lend-lease from this, the presidential program for the supply of weapons directly signed by biden, and here we are protected strategically, nothing has changed for the worse for us. i just want to say that in the context, the very end defeated us in the district already well-known in ukraine due to public accusations against the head of the president's office andriy yarmak , congress moment viktoria sparz, she was re-elected to this position again retained her seat in the house of representatives, the only thing that needs to be said is probably the ukrainian authorities will somehow have to come to terms with her. we would somehow like not very well the last time in a public question and i also wanted to talk with you olezhe about kherson oblast literally about an hour before the russian
6:53 pm
military and political leadership announced the military the fact that they are withdrawing e-e troops from kherson oblast, the press secretary of the ministry of foreign affairs and russia, maria zakharova, said that russia is ready to negotiate with ukraine, taking into account the current realities, and how let's decipher it in human language in human language it sounds as follows ay-ay-ay what kind of negotiation is there ? with the population, etc. a-a it remains, of course, although the banal knowledge of hector and
6:54 pm
that until the ukrainian troops take the left bank of kherson, most likely on such a forecast from the russian side, several kilometers along the coast, first of all, on the left bank, on the right bank, play and the damage will not be so serious , according to the best way to shoot your own troops in the back and try to come up with, and the russians, if the children of the perga dnieper deeper there than olezhki and further back. it is obvious that the channel will now say that we recognize equality as a reality that was
6:55 pm
created and go. now for them to implement it, let's offer us something, let's let the ukrainians pass the negotiations. i think that the church and what suggest what they expect from ukraine, what proposals, for example, eh, take military action with the fixation of the de-facto collision, which is now ah, well, with this statement, they actually gave up on eh, for a single day and a second , the part of the kherson region of zaporizhzhia that was not under their control mykolaiv oblasts and next to them. thus, in fact, they may want to fix the line further
6:56 pm
, so at least it is necessary to equip those bulls that are a little during the winter, replenish the stock of accurate high-precision weapons, repair the equipment put industry on military rails, but then from the spring you can start a new round of the campaign , because now russia has lost the military initiative, the diplomatic information initiative, they need to recover there. by the way, i already quoted mykhailo podolyak today. he said that so far the ukrainian side does not see any signs that the russian forces are withdrawing, the head of the mykolaiv da vitalik also made a statement to which he also said that he does not believe that the russian forces will withdraw their troops. nato reacted to the statement of the russian side, he says, well, let's wait and see, that is, i see that, at least so far, in the information space from the ukrainian side and from european partners, there are some
6:57 pm
doubts about whether russia will really leave these territories. then the question is related to such as how vladimir putin can now explain this to his electorate to the russian society about why they left kherson , that is, will it not work out for him, so it will not turn into a big political fiasco and what maybe it will provoke some protests there, i don’t know, not about the tests, but really, a lot of dead people will start asking for something, they will say, we took kherson. now you give it away. that is, won’t it become the cause of protests in russia? there will be no protests. there will be no russians. they died for the great victory, and we will repeat it, and they are ready
6:58 pm
to die further. it is local in nature and not massive, and even where there are many coffins, it is still enough for this prosthesis to really go out into the streets. the russians can do it, of course. they are great humanists, and today he was actually repeated by suroviking and said that the life of russian soldiers is very valuable and important and key, accordingly, these maneuvers must be carried out by occupying the left bank . he replied that he shares this opinion. indeed, life is important, accordingly, it is necessary to occupy the left bank. and in this negative, why did this happen and why is it necessary to occupy them
6:59 pm
now ? but if such a question is raised, it will arise, then as always the guilty, found guilty, will remember the generals who allowed this situation to happen, and then, together with the unconscious part of the military, he accepted a difficult but the right and wise decision to save the lives of the russians, because they are great humanists . russia has its forces from the kherson region and it is just hanging there, as you just said, in order to allegedly save the lives of the soldiers. well, we will monitor what will happen next there. thank you very much oleg sahakyan, political scientist in particular, they talked about the american elections and the events in the kherson region, which we will also follow. in the next few hours, i think that tomorrow
7:00 pm
we will see more news and information on this topic. the internet and the freedom of life will be back on the air already tomorrow, we will listen to people suffering from rheumatism. but arthritic is impossible to get used to, it does not allow to move. i tried everything. and at the pharmacy i bought a yellow dolgit cream, it saves me from the pain of rheumatism reduces swelling and improves the mobility of the joints and back
13 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Espreso TV Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on