from north korea, where else can they bring it from and how can we counteract this, what do we have in this regard, can you expand it in some way, describe everything, what to expect here? well, here you know, there is a theoretical plane and a practical plane, the theoretical plane is already there, there were several there are several reports about the fact that it is already there. as if in november, russia should start using iranian political missiles of the same 110 isolfokars, there were repeated reports that russia is supposedly conducting negotiations with the north korea, including not only the supply of artillery ammunition, but also the supply of what the american media called short- range missiles. well, maybe they meant here, including the north korean kn-23 missile, which is very suspiciously similar to the russian ballistic iskander. well, but strict practice shows that in addition to the possibility of russia extracting something there, well, they are not so wide, purely because russia also tries when it trades with someone , it constantly tries to twist the years and it is not a partner

i always like it here. in this context, it is worth paying attention to these messages from the british skynu yesterday, according to which it turns out that russia paid for the first batch of flying mopeds , even with some sacred nuclear technologies or something else like that, as it was believed to have paid there 140 million euros in cash and gave it away. as i understand it, used launchers for enlau javelin thrown away in the haste of battles somewhere there, and swingers. a discussion about the fact that the tyrant has put a certain dependence on russia, because tehran is ready to give a lot of flying mopeds in exchange for something valuable, like nuclear technology. well, it looks like the russians have followed their own strategy. that's why they now have to a certain time to accumulate weapons of destruction in the form of aircraft and to have a certain supply of at least air-launched and sea-launched cruise missiles of these

same caliber missiles, because it is indicative that there is another detail from the summary of the general staff for today at night, let's say so. well, what happened in the morning was reported that during the night, five russian tomikaze lancet drones shot down our lancet, that is, not mopeds , but the entry of lancets has already gone, that is, it is possible that the russians will need a few weeks in order for er- to accumulate a supply of cruise missiles and repeat the attacks. maybe the russians will try to introduce at least one more missile corvette of the karakurt project, which apparently went on sea trials in the black sea. well, so far, practice shows that exaggerating the ability of russia to acquire weapons for themselves on the world market, well , fortunately, it is not worth it yet, because the russians also act on a certain inertia, they believe that they can twist the hands of their allies

. to iran about the supply of football missiles, or will france and italy sooner have time to supply us with complexes on their own, which, as they say, have the ability to fight football goals, well, accordingly, there is something there too promised to speed up with these irises of theirs, which also have the ability to be populist goals . well, it turns out that we are now in a race to be the first or the western allies will have time to hand over to us or iran will still have time to hand over the promised missiles to russia, especially since iran came there to negotiate with the entire petro that it looks like something in the relations between iran and russia began to deteriorate, and the intervention of such a putin top official was necessary. well, in fact, she has already run out of time. this is in order to prevent them from worsening our situation with our infrastructure, because it is clear that they will try to accumulate and strike, and here you said an important thing, who should be faster, it is desirable for us

to make it as soon as possible well, these battles near kherson must be very selective, do not hurry, so to speak. so you have summed up our conversation , everything else, we'll keep an eye on it. and we'll wait, well, actually, we can only watch and restrain now, these are some attempts at movement. thank you, it was viktor tregubov and ivan kyrychevskyi, and we'll meet in a week. well, and watch the espresso tv channel, we still have a lot of interesting things for you, no matter what ukrainians think about, no matter what they talk about, the first place is still war, war and our victory, seven days a week from monday, monday, seven different spheres of human activity, sports, culture, politics, eight presenters espresso journalists experts opinion leaders in real time about the most relevant events through the prism of war every day author's projects on

espresso join the community with a ukrainian view of the world become a sponsor of the youtube channel espresso and this is access to exclusive content - personal thanks, fixed comments, special icons and the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click to sponsor and become part of the community with the ukrainian view of the defender well, listen, the defender of ukraine sees in the dark as if he can hear his brothers for kilometers around you can move quickly any what area is the body reliably protected that makes it less sensitive and more confident and looks at the height of a bird's flight 8 years in a row we are with you we provide our defenders with what preserves their lives on the front lines, our priorities are day-

night and thermal imaging optics, communication, off-road vehicles, individual protection and technical means of intelligence, join the fundraising and let the next night be calm for everyone except the occupiers. as usual on the espresso tv channel on weekdays at eight o'clock live and in the evening at 11:00 p.m. in a repeat whenever it's convenient for you watch us on the internet russia is once again slowing down the operation of the grain corridor black sea initiatives is not working at full capacity due to the slow work of russian inspectors. this was reported by the ministry of infrastructure, the representative of russia in the joint coordination center began working in october so that the number of inspections per day decreased from seven to nine . until the 7th, so there was a queue of

210 vessels when russia decided to suspend its participation in the inspection work for a few days, turkey and the un began to inspect grain carriers independently and it turned out that their work was significantly more productive internal displacement, people may lose their monthly payments in ukraine, checks are being introduced, and in case of non-compliance with the rules of migrants and migrants, they may be deprived of payments from the state, the place of residence of citizens will be selectively checked by officials of the territorial body of the national social service service of ukraine, deputy minister of social policy vitaly muzychenko said this if a person is not caught on the spot, it is not a problem, the citizen must contact the of the social protection authority of the population, where he was registered as a displaced person, if he passes the identification of the issues, there is no payment and that is why

the deputy minister further explained that this is a reliable new online platform for emergency digital assistance to ukrainians . get advice on protecting personal data there and at the same time improve your digital literacy the program was developed by the ministry of digital transformation it is currently in test mode and will be especially useful for residents of the temporarily occupied territories because the platform published information on how to prepare for smartphone checks by the occupiers , which messengers to use and how to avoid eavesdropping during the occupation of the dnipro fishing patrol specialists released more than ten thousand carp into the river, the process was observed by our e- journalists who arrived at the reservoir in cherkasy region,

fishermen form a special sleeve and release monkeys into the open water, the driver of a truck for the transportation of fry oleksandr is engaged in this responsible business for 10 years. his route lasted almost 5 hours, and all this time oleksandr monitored the supply of oxygen to the tanks with fish. the cylinder was connected. and with these eyes and through them , she breathes. she doesn’t know how much they prove to oxygen. tomorrow, the gills will burn more , and even less. chickens will then begin to die, and here are 10,000,333 specimens of white and variegated the bream reached the dnipro river intact and

unharmed. this species of fish was not chosen by chance, because the bream is the main biological remediator of water bodies. what is the bream? algae in recent years stocking was carried out with state funds this year because of the war the stocking was bought with the funds of users who lead fishing in the reservoir they work catch fish we control it in they have quotas. they have quotas. they work as before the war according to quotas. well, we see that on the counters of stores and so on, there is fish supplied to the military, and canned food was also made and handed over to the

military experts. it is considered plus seven degrees in about a week, the fish must adapt and then it floats down the reservoir in search of a place to winter iryna skripachova kyrylo vorontsov tv channel espresso well, let's talk about the loudest news of this week about the transfer of private companies to the state together with two experts this is yevhen dubagres analyst e-e invited associate expert of the analytical center casey ukraine sorry for such a difficult slant and e mykhailo demkiv financial analyst and groups of companies isu greetings colleagues greetings good morning, of course, not only about this news, but this news is the loudest. on november 5, a meeting of the meeting of the supreme commander-in-chief was held. nobody i knew what was said there, but already on the 6th it turned out that

a decision was made to alienate assets, including motor sich zaporizhzhia, transfor autokras, ukrnafta , ukrtenafta and these seized assets, which are or partially private or completely private, they did not have the status of military property, they were transferred to the ministry of defense, they say that after the end of martial law , the assets will be returned to their owners or their value will be reimbursed, what is your attitude to this decision, let's start with this and then we will understand in more detail in the nuances of this decision, yevgeny, let's take a look at it. it seems to me that this decision is correct in principle, yes, because there are those assets that simply have the strategic importance of the state, the only thing that i am surprised by is what, why is this it happened so late well, because, relatively speaking, everyone knew about the problems with transformers, that we needed transformers for the country in order to work in the winter and somehow more actively switch from

motor sich that it is there at all. a very old and very unpleasant story that an asset that could worked for that country, worked not always for our country , worked for our enemy for ukrnafta, it is also now a strategic enterprise, taking into account the fact that by and large this is the only company left that is still extracting something in a certain way sells, he means fuel, that's why it usually looks wild in peacetime, even this nationalization that it was done so quickly that it was done is possible non-compliance with all the legal norms that we are used to yes, but during the war i think it's just everything was also about politics. the ukrainian climate will have a very strong influence. but maybe mykhailo represents an investment company, you work with investors' money

. and what do they say? maybe you have already seen some feedbacks, like this, they actually shifted the focus of attention only to the oligarchs who did not fully belong to this company. a small part of some of these enterprises also belonged to small investors in the same company , or many thousands of employees of the company owned such small shares, some for several hundred hryvnias, many people at one time believed in the ukrainian market or, well, in zero hands and bought shares of the same ukrnafta or sichi motor for several tens of thousands of hryvnias and their money was also, in fact, their assets were taken by the state with a promise to return them someday, as for the investment climate it is unlikely that such decisions are worse than russian

missiles and can er and worsen the situation with him no but if we are not er discussing the decision from a military point of view, we trust the ukrainian army, we trust the supreme commander-in-chief's rate, then in principle, the critic is careful and negative those things it should be . since we should not forget our rights as a group of citizens, and even though we sacrifice them for a while , we will never forget these armed aggressions after it ends and we must always defend them, in particular and the right to property. well, i have a question. why couldn’t it just be, i understand the military needs and but it was possible to come and i don’t know, transfer these motors to the property of the state or cars or

fuel directly why it was necessary to transfer the shares of the company to the extent that it is similar to a military necessity, eh. of course, i am not a military expert, but in terms of technology, to what extent will the state be able to be more effective than private owners or than such a mix of private owners and the state as it was in ukr e naft, for example mykhailo, are you from completed, let's continue , there cannot be a more effective state, but it will come from completely different tasks from our own military ones, we are talking about shares because the decision of the commission on securities of the stock markets has essentially become public. and these military decisions are from currentless e- e questions of reasoning are not public and we cannot discuss them e logic of transfer of full control of the company means the possibility to immediately change the management of

these companies and start functioning of these enterprises or what is left of them, we will be frank in e-e in the shortest possible time where the maximum ensuring efficiency for the ukrainian army is probably p evgeny and from your point of view as an analyst in this company e-e how can they be evaluated, they say that they compensate the owners e after the war, er, their value. and is there any value there during the hostilities? who can estimate it, how it will be evaluated in general, computer key someday. do you think or not? i think that they will compensate, they will compensate after the war, and er, it seems simple to me. when this decision was adopted, people either forgot or did not take into account these small minorities of ordinary ukrainians. yes, people like us,

who own these small packages. with two actions, the company was blocked during peacetime . they simply decided to get rid of this risk, but i am sure that now there is a wave of publications in the press, a wave of indignation of those ukrainians who, in principle, lost their savings that once invested these actions, it will lead to the fact that compensation will be a question of assessment - this is a very good question and it seems to me that the state should not sit on the money, as they say, it will be worth compensating these funds at the market value that will be after the war already when there will be an investment boom as soon as the money comes to the country and then evaluate these companies at the new value and give the money to the people because now of course i absolutely agree that there is no market there is no way to determine the real value of the boots at this stage it does not work here and there is no

we still work, i have such a question related to the owners of these companies, uh, the majority or at least large ones, so they emphasize in the press that they are oligarchs or big businessmen, and it seems that such a process of de-oligarchization is taking place, but if you look at the surname, some surnames are not there for example, there are no such famous names as akhmetov or pinchuk, and who were the owners, why, uh, conditionally, uh, one got an oligarch, nothing was taken from the others, well, akhmetov, for example, has oblenergo, which are also critical and important, but no one came to him and did not take these shares, sir, you know i am like that, i am like that, the expression is that we are sitting parts of us

. who will manage it and, simply speaking, we need to prove the usefulness of this step. but it seems to me that the question of the owners was on the agenda and it was taken into account by those who made decisions in order to show more and focus on the fact that these are oligarchs - these are people who robbed ukrainians for many years, you know, to perceive a positive reaction of the people, but it seems to me that the question here is really more about the oligarchs and, in fact, that these assets are really needed by the state and needed first of all the ministry of defense in order to wage war effectively well, and the legal purity of such a decision also, i have already seen the columns of lawyers who, er, well, for example, on ukrainian pravda , who express their criticism of the

mechanism itself, how it all happened, er, but i i understand that all this will be proved in the courts, i have not yet heard that someone filed a lawsuit against this decision, eh, i did not see mr. mykhaylov. at the moment, that is, the management that is there now will not remain or will hmm, after all, some kind of agreement with him has been made with him. well, i think that here decisions will be made according to the situation, because it is necessary to maintain a balance between and understand the technological processes in er, in these companies, they are difficult, especially on motor sichi and the second point, remove unwanted people from the management, if the majority owner of motor sichi has questions about cooperation with russia, he was probably not the only one there, so far

the process of changing management is not very public, and from the information that was in the media the supervisory boards were appointed, they have already received a lot of criticism that they are not specialists in their profession, but i understand that the logic in this process was different to carry out this alienation, not nationalization, but alienation as quickly as possible to take and put people who are, let's say, in the arms of the government, and this is also officials and people who are on the boards of other companies who are, roughly speaking, close at hand, they can pick up this process, they have already done it and started appointing management already from specialists in their field who will be able to correctly manage these companies, well, on this issue, i think that it is possible to complete the only one, i will add that, uh, your colleague, not the economist serhiy fursa, was more radical in his assessment of this situation,

if you read in his post he wrote that this war communism and what scares off investors, i see that you are not so critical of this decision as he is, it's just a style of presenting information, serhiyem. unfortunately, i cannot technically connect a third party so that she can also argue with us. mr. serhiy, we talk on monday as usual, i will definitely ask him again , but have you perhaps already talked with him, or have there already been any debates on this topic? is this the first such debater, when have we discussed it publicly? after the war a the legislation gives five years after the end of martial law for compensation. it will not be a return of the money, but a loan, because from a purely practical point of view, there are thousands of investors and everyone should go and ask them to provide their bank account details, we will transfer the money

to you, according to our own assessment, are they fair or not no, it is very difficult, it is much easier with one decision to return everything to the way it was. but again, there is the question of the kolomoi yaroslavsky oligarchs and other things in which they will be in legal status er for this time, will there be financial claims against them from the state, these are all the things that we will pay attention to already after the victory, mr. yevgeny , you share that returning the share was easier than compensation . it seems to me that this is the same case, but here in this case. in my opinion, it was very good for the state to just give a message that people do not worry, you will get those returned or shares or money, and those ordinary people, as in this one, did you invest don't be left without your savings. and what happened is just a military necessity that should have happened so that people calm down, we will continue to monitor this

situation, will there be courts, will these enterprises be effective under new managers, and will this enable us to win? i hope that it will of course as soon as possible and another controversial decision that i heard about is that the antonov state enterprise is still building a second an-225 mriya aircraft after the first one was destroyed in the kyiv region by russian phantoms according to the head of the company, the new dream is already 30% ready, it is being mounted somewhere in a secret place, yevhen gavrilov, the acting general director of antonov, told about it in leipzig on e in an interview here with a publication in german. what do you think of this news? do we need a new dream e i understand that the brand is the largest aircraft in the world, but how economically feasible is it to build this aircraft, mr. yevgeny,

well, we definitely need a new dream from the point of view of image, the first one, it often prevails even economically feasible, but here it seems to me that in this particular case, it was a bit inappropriate to paraphrase the words of the general director, mmm, it was about the fact that back in the soviet union, when the dream was being built, its duplicates were built there, it was then built somewhere approximately the same by 30% abroad this one 39% there was a dream and it remains there. that is, it is not that now funds from the budget are allocated for its completion. is there such a principled decision, but simply that there is still, in principle, an opportunity to complete the dream there in the same state as it was? it seems to me that this is exactly the case was an image. is that how you would say marketing history, mr. mykhailo, is a dream. should it be completed or not? i understood that even if the

words of general director antonov were interpreted a little incorrectly, these 30% are dreams. what should i do with them? for this project, it was announced that half a billion dollars would be invested in its completion . this is a fantastic amount of money. i was engaged in a dream before the arrival of the russian occupiers. but uh, i definitely do not imagine a situation when the ukrainian government talks about the difficult situation in the budget at the negotiations with western partners, asks for huge sums of aid in this very budget and with the second hand hands out to such, let's say, a project of non-obvious expediency at the moment that is why it is for private business. but i believe the dream will be rebuilt. thank you

, dear experts, mykhailo demkiv , financial analyst of the icu investment group and yevgeny dubogres, associate expert , were with us. of the analytical center case ukraine talked about the forced expropriation of private companies in favor of the state during the war that we will talk about this topic later this week and finally the positive news that during october the international reserves of ukraine increased by 5.5% to 25 and 24 billion dollars after the fall of the month earlier so the main thing is to manage money in the state effectively andriy yanivskyi economic news on espresso tv channel together we will win let's listen to people

suffering from rheumatism and arthritic before that i can't get used to it, it doesn't allow me to move. i've tried everything. and at the pharmacy, i bought dolgit yellow cream. it saves me from pain in rheumatism, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility. the only yellow cream for joint and back pain. i'm iryna koval, mother, wife, presenter of the espresso tv channel, and me. volunteer, our soldiers at the front need a lot of things every day, and that is why it is part of my life. today, this is help to the armed forces of ukraine, and i am very grateful to my colleagues for supporting me in this. sports during the war are empty stadiums without fans in the stands. deserted sports halls and destroyed sports facilities, our athletes lost the opportunity to

train at home because of the war and had to flee abroad to prepare for future starts those who remained with weapons in their hands are heroically defending ukraine in this war ukraine's second place does not suit us we need a victory kovyska saves the life of our soldiers and our victory is getting closer, there will be people suffering from rheumatism and arthrosis , it is changing, right? improves the mobility of the joints because the joints are already broken by a single yellow cream