so we lose contact but i hope now we will be able to restore the uh signal uh because dmytro galkin stopped mid-sentence it is very interesting to listen to what is uh for russia there are others yes yes we are working you again i then the question is current uh tell me, please, if russia will be represented at the g20 no longer in the face of the president of the russian federation, but perhaps only in the face of the minister of foreign affairs, can this give ukraine a chance to become the star of this summit? horrible and uh, of course, ukraine is showing heroic efforts by offering such a greek effort, but not only for the protection of its freedom. well, and uh, for the preservation of global danger, but in the world now, such a number of problems are decomposed into a difficult situation in the world. and in the screen sphere, and

uh, well all the same, all the same, from the point of view of global security yes, that is, let's see, don't let go in terms of quantity, it's a sacrifice to the strategist, yes , from the point of view of software security, finally, the confrontation around taiwan represents a much greater threat than the war in ukraine. that is, uh, i think that uh, i think that, of course, if ukraine proposed some kind of agenda related to global or at least european security, then it would be correct . there would be some very serious step , eh, that's fine, and there is hope that the ukrainian side will present this security format, you know, at the kyiv security forum in early autumn, a certain format

of what this should be this construction of security in europe and how ukraine should be included there already after winning this war, and these security guarantees, yes, they are already formalized in a certain way and they can be presented to the g20, that is, i am saying about this that this is a chance to do it i i i don't dispute the chance, that's it, and i don't say it, i object to it. it was against the phrase that ukraine can become a specialty . -e usa and china and in general the threat of targeted actions by the chinese aimed at enlightening taiwan and the general situation in the south china sea and the situation in the economy, that is,

uh . but if ukraine succeeds in presenting its security concept and the concept finds a response, it will be a huge step forward. well, look, global food security - this includes the issue of the war in ukraine, blocked ports, we cannot export our grain, ukraine well, if we use soviet terminology, it was the granary of europe, this is what concerns global food security, what specifically concerns security issues, why is the issue of taiwan more important now than, for example, russia's threats to use nuclear weapons in ukraine, because in ukraine a nuclear precedent can be set for the world. well, it is more frightening, why do you think taiwan is higher in the story now day than a nuclear attack on ukraine well, i want to say

that if there was really a nuclear attack on ukraine, it would be real . who started the war on february 24, non -exchangeable people should expect everything, but the real threat of russia using nuclear weapons is not noticeable, that is, we do not see any preparations for this, not political from a military point of view, but then say a-a well, what will the use of tactical even nuclear movement give, even in the belt they are probably tactical weapons for that is what will happen eh, that is, the strategic war has already been lost. because there is his own and somewhere there is a job baron how to tame

tactical nuclear weapons. strange political, that is, the united states, because there will be an immediate response given by what, er, with what other conventional weapons, which will simply not be pleasant for russia. then putin wants to negotiate without any preconditions like today zakharova just said the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation. do you remember when they thought they were winning the war ? eh, to tell this, start a negotiation now, when the war, when the war is a strategic loss, they are ready to negotiate, eh, they are ready to negotiate, they say because we

are playing, they don't want to agree, so that they recognize the captured territory, so that he eh, well, he said it eh, or opereimy games along the line of division. well, how is it about something so that he, eh, will present it as a victory within the country, because it is understandable to say something, eh, he needs to get out of this situation in order to preserve power, see russia, because one of the main goals of the war is the preservation of the properties behind the grutyrovka, which is a question . therefore, this is exactly what is being agreed on. strategically, logically, this is a white war. it should become a complete dependence of the country, which does not have external political external economic guarantees exclusively for russia no opinion well, i don't know there, it's probably even worse

than in the dprk, when eh, that is, there meow comes the control eh of russia, which is clear that this will not happen, the strategic goal will not allow it to occur, there was a second strategic action , show the dispersal of them, ukrainian army, the potential of russia we all see that ukraine, which did not have weapons, means russia, which had 20 times nothing of artillery, er, er, systems of volley fire, and in general , it performed perfectly - seriously, er, the russian continues now give way in many ways we show that is she applied the plant impressed and i'm not talking about uh about it say about what ukraine and backpacks which from the point of view of the balance of power just

said that it's impossible to choose that is uh strategic goals they already they cannot be reached in principle, yes, but in principle, we understand that the goals for which the war began are already plants, so the russians want to achieve at least some tactical escape and the appearance of the fact that here and say here are the captured territories sanctions, yes, for the discotheque, internal, internal, internal, political, and even worked externally, the last name has no meaning, but for the boredom of political affairs, there will probably be a broadcast of a strategic breakthrough, well, a strategic breakthrough, a technical passport, that’s already it , that’s not going to change and that’s why here, when the russian authorities, the main thing is to get out of this situation with, er, some minimal losses. well, by the way,

they will try to do this, so they say, let's talk with us sometime and that's why they left the grain deal, and then when they realized that this would complicate the situation from an external physical point of view, they didn't come back right away, although it's true that there would probably be a serious chance to put pressure on ukraine, or they would understand without to block the export magazines, well, the agency we see returned through literally the next day, so the strategic game happened, the rest of the conversation is a little bit said in order to get out of these traps that are impossible, they drove themselves с минимальные пакетиком well, look, russia declares various goals very quickly, here it manages to follow them , it was demilitarization, denationalization - this is also what we

did. why should russia have any results, they can leave ukraine completely with the same success, but for the domestic audience, they can tell that they won here, just like the dprk claimed that they won the world cup in football. that's how russia can become the ruler of the world. what is the difference with their level of propaganda? why do they have such losses from the negotiations with ukraine? now they have left kherson, they said , and their social networks are boiling over there. i want to tell you . eh, this is a war has a huge huge instrumental value for the russian region, because uh, why they could

n't, uh , they couldn't, no. it will be a war, but what kind of war is it? all the pressure on ukraine constant aggression towards ukraine they pass from the 14th year they go they you sold your wife i would for sure continue something always simple no i just didn’t suggest that it was in a terrible shape but uh yeah because uh uh that’s why что there are no other ways of governing, the royal way, uh, the armed way of governing, that's uh, that's according to the principle of victimized jealousy , that's why we fight around the council, we protect our sovereignty , therefore, everyone who gives way against our dear leader and leader is their traitor they must be expelled. they need to be arrested. and in general, it’s enough to start as much as there is nothing left of the law of wartime of the second. and the same with the regional ones, how to keep the regional games. you can only say that by means of strict control, and the system

of strict control is possible only under the conditions of some kind of mobilization by an external threat , and so on. it's just not a job, uh, and here's to look for it. well, uh, and it would not be much less effective, that is, the country's regime, uh, the country will break down, the hare will break down, and that's why external aggression appears. personality is the last means of holding him back and that's why for them the war has huge instrumentality and that's why if they say that we started a war that owed russia unlimited greatness and security and lost it and now only say everything will postpone what is possible let's say one more time, let's play something, guys, of course, how is this non-return to february 23, and this is why the situation was so difficult. i want to say that this is a wonderful analogy, yes, it's the

crimean war and the russian japanese war, to be exact 4.34 year eh when the one that led to the revolution yes eh eh in the fourth year the war was lost from the fifth year rebelled in different eh not in different regions crimean war in order to hold eh quests in eh it was necessary why there were entrants eh it means to change the regime yes yes start reforms putin 's reforms seem to me to be democratic in principle here is for the non-horushic defeated , that is the one, that is for nicholas ii, yes, that is, after it is necessary,

it will end, the political catastrophe will pass, and she will understand everything around him , the main thing is that everything around him is there. i am not sure that all the people who stood around him are not they want to experience a month-long political disaster, so for him i think that uh, exiting the war with uh, well, at least in the image of the winners or in the image of the undefeated one who fought there and not to lose it is very important a free method is a question of political survival in the manner of a political one. and therefore , in general, i doubt that they can somehow change their tactics and stop and stop demanding that they recognize what they have captured because, otherwise, clitic death it's clear, you know, today,

joe biden's briefing was held the day before, it was devoted to the main topics, the topic was devoted to the congressional mid-term elections, but biden answered a lot of questions from journalists in including that you touched on the topic of the g20 and you also on the topic of taiwan taiwan this is what china wants very much in any way we know these calls about it stated that it can be either peacefully or even militarily there is also the position of the united states america about the fact that if this happens, then it will be military to open the support of the united states to its partners is one thing, but what about the factors of russia, which wants to be on the same foot with the republic of china and biden spoke today so in fact, there is no friendship and close relationship between the deceased and moscow, he doubts this very much, apparently biden meant the meeting with olaf scholz, the chinese leader, where

sisinfin very strongly condemned nuclear blackmail from moscow all over the world. how can you to comment exactly on such a statement by biden that there can be no union between the deceased and moscow. well, this should be clear, that is, you think that there will be a union or something from china, a charge to his position, where he clearly stated that at the twentieth congress eh which now eh on which i am with him quickly ligerov and which eh such is imagined as a historical chinese betrayal who is not going to conclude that uh, china is not going to conclude the union , against whom, give the western ones, it was said

that this is the worshiped thinking of the western countries. she is like that, this is what they want. an ally against russia, of course this is the western union. i was just standing there. will china go? well, it is clear that the union will be polled and you will be speaking for two, because there are interesting things in china and different scales and different, uh, different directed interests of russia and china, but china will go, even though i would say that parts yes but this is the game that putin tried to introduce, that russia is against this terrible western world, which dictates to the rest of humanity its conditions, the existence of which is beneficial to him on vacation, how will russia's heroic resistance be supported? synten in this game, which reflect the

position of the projects, about whom, who wrote about that, well, probably, how russia is right according to the particles of its requirements in relations with the united states and in its own stock. it is obvious that china is not going to be an ally of russia, they are not going to provide political, not economic support, and at all they are not going to create any blocs that would uh completely or a fraud but such a harshly anti-western practice of russia is not acceptable for china and it is obvious to seek and again and again if you strategic goals would have been achieved and a strategic healer that is why it is necessary from the inside from a political point of view

, they said well that it was from an external political point of view putin wanted to show that he is a big dragon capable of fighting and leaving his interests behind - this did not prevent him from conducting this politics as a result of the space he lives in and what he imposes for this political opportunities, economic opportunities, military potential, and everything in my, yes, thanks to five such heroic heroism and the resistance of the ukrainian people. it's not uh-uh what to say uh-uh it's easier opportunity there polihychesky informational they don't allow russia uh-uh to achieve pobedovanie uh-uh from ukraine uh-uh pobedy voyny iz ukrainy a po education with ukraine, without defeating

ukraine, russia cannot be considered as something, not even in the 14th year, and earlier all this was done in order to show that russia is coming to the next 90 hours unconditional leadership of the space that we are a constant space, nothing is happening that you could cause it was not possible in russia without the fact that russia responded to this harshly, this finally returned to the custom, which is the day of truth. ends correctly because without ukraine, russia is not a leader in the soviet union. thank you very much, very interesting position . putin dmytro galkin

, political analyst, deputy director of the international institute for the study of the consequences of the war in ukraine, was in direct contact with us. this was reported to the president of the united states of america, joe biden, during a press conference in the white house, according to him, the voting results show that the population is disappointed with the state of affairs in ukraine , the heart and soul of our democracy, voters, polling station workers, election commission employees, they did their job, they fulfilled their duty communication and obviously everything went without any interference voters sent a clear and obvious signal that they want to preserve our democracy and protect the right to choose in this country they clearly made it clear who are still disappointed i understand that for many people the last few years have really been difficult joe biden president of the united states pavlo frolov people's

deputy of ukraine member of the committee on the rules of parliamentary ethics and organization of the work of the verkhovna rada of ukraine with us in direct communication pavla to you good evening to us already good morning because i know you are now in the united states yes yes good morning ukraine yes it is really evening here we are part of the observation mission of the osce parliamentary assembly which today already summarized the results of the mid-term elections in the united states and the osce mission, it recognized the elections as competitive and managed with the active participation of voters, but it was also noted that there were threats to election workers. well, it was accompanied by such phenomena and attempts to undermine trust in of the election process by unfounded doubts about its honesty . that is, about what badlin said, almost a

third of americans in connection with the previous elections 20 20 do not fully trust the results of these elections, although uh, our uh, there representatives were from more than 40 countries of the world, international observers noted that after all, the elections are huge elections and there is no reason not to trust the results of these elections, but you said the word threats, who there threatened whom? well, you know there is pressure, there is pressure on the representative election commissions well, that is, they are accused of manipulation and voter fraud. well, the special features of american elections are that at the federal level, that is, there are very few laws, the issue is actually regulated by each state. he determines how the elections are held and it is good if

it is determined at the state level, but 90% is still determined at the level of the count, that is, the county, that is, very, very different year, there is a lot of legislation of the ak that regulates elections, and in fact we see that the rules are very different elections between states. did you observe the elections in the states for the first time? no, i also observed the elections in the 20th year. well, you know the difference from the very very strong elections of 2020. well, firstly, there was a very high turnout. what i felt that for both democrats and republicans it was the most important election in life. now this polarization has remained, but still, there were elections for the parliament, for the congress of the united states, the entire lower house and

a third of the senate were elected, and there were also elections for the legislative assembly. states had various representative bodies, the americans elected prosecutors, representatives of education committees, local councils, and there were many, well, this is the peculiarity of america, there were many questions, in fact, in referendums in total, there were 100 by state, as many as 12 questions related to taxation, issues of abortion, that is, the right to abortion, questions of permission to use marijuana, questions of how much should be paid, how much should be paid to employees who actually live as if on tips, well, that is, a lot many different issues, well, this is people's power here, in principle, and it would be interesting for ukraine, i think, to implement this experience, because it is really the voters and the people who decide the issues, not the politicians, not

the deputies, but the people who decide a lot of issues, and this the peculiarities of the american elections, but our mission, she also drew attention to the fact that the united states, as an established and strong democracy, must follow the path of continuous improvement of democratic and electoral processes, in particular, for example, the residents of the capitals of the capital region, e.e., the district of columbia , that is, washington, they do not have their own representative in the parliament, that is, they pay taxes even on cars, uh, on license plates, state license plates, uh, in the capital, even policemen drive such and such cars, they say stop, let's go let's stop taxation without representation, that is, well, this is a feature of the united states constitution, that is, the states are represented, each state is represented in the lower upper house, and here is

washington, dc. they do not have a representative who has the right to vote. in the lower house, there is a representative, but he has no right vote in most states also er people who have been convicted or are in prisons they do not have the right to vote i.e. another question - this is disinformation really er there is freedom of the media there is freedom of speech they kept most of the changes from these standards of work, but uh, and this is about the process, our mission of the osce is about the fact that there is really a lot and the level of such escalation is increasing, such baseless uh, accusations of such even uh, ascorb it can be said that this offends the other party, that is, we pay attention to this, but in general, the elections were democratic and competitive, and they reflect the will of the american people, well

, the american people, pavel, you named so many issues for which you voted, how many in there were ballots in those states where we observed, there were four pages, that is, there was only one ballot, but there were different pages , and there were also for first elections to the senate, then to the house of representatives, to the lower house, then elections to the legislative bodies of the states, points, then in local chancellors, i.e. local councils, and so on and at the end, this is already a question of people's power, that is, they decided uh, how uh, these or other issues, whether to allow the use of cannabis, for example, or whether to increase taxation, how to spend uh, money and is it necessary to rename, for example, the state court of appeals in our state to change its name and call it the supreme court of the state? it had to be decided by a referendum

. not yet, not the republicans, not the democrats, they have not yet gained control over the lower or upper house. but in order for the republicans to get, well, that is, to win a majority in the lower house, they need from the 41st district, where the winner is still uncertain, they need get 11, and the democrats, respectively, 30, that is, it looks like the lower house will most likely come under the control of the republicans. currently, both houses are controlled by the democrats. and with regard to the senate, the situation is very interesting. the situation is very interesting now. republicans and 48 democrats currently receive 49 mandates out of 100. in three states the counting is still going on

and you know that in one state there will be a second round - it's george there will be a second round and yes in georgia there will be a second round and it turns out so in these states where the counting is going on there he may even win democrats, that is, fifty fifty, in fact, with regard to the senate, it is still very difficult to predict the outcome of these elections, but you know that in the last almost 80 years, such a feature of american elections is that the presidential party loses these midterm elections to the senate. presidential elections are held once every four years, and parliamentary elections elections are held every two years and the lower house is completely re-elected, so in fact in 93 % of cases, in the last 80 years, the presidential party has lost midterm elections, and there are exceptions to this there were e when e there were e periods