subsidize in my opinion, yesterday's day and yesterday's event are definitely related to the fact that the russian leaders of the armed forces announced the clan- planned maneuvers, as they announced the movement of russian troops from the right bank to the left bank - this is the main news the main news of that that this would not have happened if the armed forces of ukraine did not act during the last few months, that is, russia was forced to make and assessments that are made, why was it done, well, probably from the point of view that they calculated that they would lose anyway, that's it anyway, they will be forced to flee from there, so it is better to do it the way they did and use it for and here is the question for me, the question is probably that this event is presented in

connection with the information that was presented in separate publications e analysts of various countries and the united states of america and western europe who spoke about the fact that we understand the position of ukraine, that they do not want to talk with russia, that we have all the ukrainian arguments to understand, but this is not a wise position and probably after kherson will be released, it is worth sitting at the table, that is, this is the only thing that worries me more than anything else, that in this way russia is probably playing along with that part of the establishment in the west that is ready to demand from ukraine that ukraine sit at the negotiating table, and this is a game of words budanov, i interpret it in

the way that there is such pressure, there is such a position that exists in the west, that exists, maybe somewhere else, but that position can be leveled only one way by the behavior of ukraine, that the armed forces will continue to fight, will continue to win back our territory that it will be difficult for us in the winter, we have to prepare for it, that's why i understand these words that it will depend on us whether we or they will put us at the table or we will fight to choose our own to prove our point of view that ukraine should be a condition of negotiations with russia what was announced by the president of ukraine should be the return to the borders of 1991 and the return of the liberation of the territory that we should be a reliable rear for

our armed forces for our struggle, confirmation of what you just said this is an important moment and we can also talk about it, there is a way of how they somehow want to put us at the negotiating table, under what conditions we can talk, someone has already partially expressed this, it is important, the press secretary of the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation maria zara zakharova said just today that moscow is ready for a dialogue with kyiv, taking into account the current realities , we are open to negotiations as before, we have never refused them, we are ready to conduct them, it is clear that taking into account those reality on february 27, the deputy head of the ministry of foreign affairs of russia andriy rudenko stated that the key to the victory with kyiv should be the de-nazification and demilitarization of ukraine, and already this week, on november 8, he announced that there are no conditions for negotiations with ukraine, that is, we understand

that they are systematically taking this step back there are no conditions anymore, but they are ready to talk with us, ah, and here is another tweet from mr. podolyak, because it is also important. the kremlin is exhausted, russia's resources are reaching their limits, hence the historic request to give a break negotiations from here and patrushev's visit to tehran, the search for a way to continue the war, to get missiles, drones, to overcome our missile exhaustion, the perfect time to double aid to ukraine, mykhailo podolyak wrote on twitter, eh, that is, it is clear that we can demonstrate our position and our strength when we really have weapons and we will be able , our armed forces will be strong in this . well, if this does not happen, then of course things will be more difficult for us. mykola knyazhytskyi , people's deputy of ukraine, is with us on skype. european solidarity i congratulate you, mykola, and just in continuation of the

topic we are talking about, how should we react to what is possible after the successful operation in kherson, these conversations about the fact that we need to sit down and negotiate something, it is possible to return to the borders that were as of february 24 appear . what are your thoughts? well, many are now talking about possible negotiations, but let's just put ourselves in the place of the highest leadership of ukraine in the studio, people's deputies, we are all responsible to society, just like the president, like ours army, well, who among us will agree to the fact that part of ukraine remains occupied, of course, no one , it is obvious that none of us wants to, uh, there should be any negotiations that legalize the situation, which is exactly the same. none of us wants to give russia time to rearm to reformat its

army in order for it to resume its offensive after the armistice with new strength. at the same time, we understand very well that we are not completely independent either , because we are fighting the weapons of our partners if our partners move there to give weapons or stop to help us restore our economy, even though we have a perfectly strong and honestly responsible army, it will be difficult for our soldiers to move forward and liberate the territory without these weapons . therefore, in our devotion to democratic values, to european values, we are ready to fight for the liberation of all our territories , for the victory outside. and victory is the liberation of all our territories, i don't see any other option it is obvious. if we are not given weapons, it will be difficult for us to do this, why can this happen? well, if we have a corrupt government that will quarrel with its partners, that will conduct some shady negotiations itself, there are many dangers, opportunities,

there is fatigue from the war on which russia is counting on, there are resources that the united states of america is spending . people who are against supporting ukraine, because among the republicans there are also many of our soyas. those occupied are the territories that are currently occupied, but i do not see the possibility for the ukrainian authorities to conduct negotiations about this right now, i would like to ask you about the results of the elections in the united states of america because these midterm elections were held there, during which the americans completely re-elected the house of representatives, a third of the senate, legislatures and

governors in many of their states, and while judging by the preliminary results, control of the house of representatives may pass to the republicans with a slight advantage. currently, both houses of congress are controlled by the democrats, the president joe biden, that is, well, ukrainians are actually interested in how these results will affect what aid will look like for us from the united states of america. support it is clear that from what we have seen and what the experts say, little has changed significantly but still, what is your analysis of the situation? obviously, biden himself supports ukraine and will support us . we will not give it to ukraine, most of them did not pass the congress, among the republicans who passed there are many allies of ukraine

. the co-chairman from the united states of america is senator mark rubio, he is a republican, but he very much supports ukraine and in his speeches and actions he talks about it all the time, like many others , so i do not think that the schedule has changed in the number of people who will support ukraine is united by the states, the president, whether he is done consistently, the democrats who are there are done consistently, there was such a left wing, but we see, we saw that they withdrew their statement, there were such right-wing republicans who spoke, not much of them passed in parliament, so the two-party majority will continue to support ukraine, so i don't think that the united states will change its support for ukraine. thank you, mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of ukraine, european solidarity. and here is the information that the russian federation plans to test nuclear torpedoes, cnnt with reference to its own sources

say that recently the united states has been watching russian naval vessels, in particular the belgorod submarine, and that they were probably preparing for nuclear torpedo tests in a week, some the ships left the range, but the tests were not carried out in the usa, they think because of technical difficulties and the effect of western sanctions, but the fact that their ships move through the black sea is the same, experts say about it, and in fact you can expect different things from them . in the states, i have already said and i will say it again, and the elections in the states are absolutely optimal for us, in my opinion, because even this minimal victory of the republicans in the congress and the possibility that the future speaker will be what he is mccarthy, yes, he is pro-ukrainian and he is very supportive, that is, those few shouters who came there, they will not influence at all, today there is such two-party support for ukraine as a whole, which for us, on the contrary, we should use as a new chance, that is, the change of new faces of the new

leadership will not give an opportunity for them to express themselves in a new way. i think they will be even sharper and, er, more targeted. i want to remind you that when biden offered ukraine 33 billion, the republicans increased the amount to 40 billion, that is, now there will be a competition to get ahead of who helps ukraine more democrats through the publicists biden or mccarthy, i think that this situation is absolutely favorable for us and what is really changing in america and these elections have shown that is why they are called midterms because they are in principle in the middle of the presidential term and this is already the start of the start of a new presidential campaign today, in my opinion, he has absolutely great chances, all the analysts in america say that this is the governor of florida , ron e. desantes, who is really a republican, who are such idiots and very conservative his beliefs and that is, he saw in him the new leader of america, perhaps this really will be some kind of transformation, big changes, therefore, in principle, we are rooting for america, this is a strategic alliance with us,

which partner we want more weapons we want more help we want all those spacers that are in the way and we know a lot about them, they are also in the white house and all the other obstacles that are created in order to force ukraine to sit down at the negotiating table with putin and come to an agreement, we do not need such people, we do not need to subject this pressure, we have to keep a clear line and press and we have a lot of allies there who support us, if you allow a few things i will give about the aid figures, if i am not mistaken, the aid figure for ukraine during the full-scale invasion is approximately 18 billion, correct me if it is wrong , because everyone please pray total or relatively total in terms of funds, billions in total to ukraine during the period of the full-scale they probably united everything that could be united with the help of a ukrainian abroad and so on, not with we are talking about funds and weapons, if we are talking

about the receipt of money specifically there, ah, live funds and weapons, look well. once again, thank you for sending. and just once, if we are talking about the receipt of the sum of money itself, i will give you a simple comparison, it is a lot, it is a lot of full-scale on the scale of the united states, one microsoft company for three, three quarters of this year received 17 billion in profit, this is just one company, this is a lot for the united states, this is all together, this is not only the united states, it sent this to the budget the sum was delivered by all of them together, and the damage to ukraine according to preliminary estimates is 10 dash 400 billions somewhere in there, so how do you calculate, so let’s talk about the fact that they helped us a lot , as we needed, and at the same time you say not to criticize our partners it is not necessary to thank them, but to say that we need much more

great britain alone announced that it seized 18 billion russian property. there is only one great britain, we are waiting for this right now, about the correct mechanism for transferring these reparations to ukraine, which we might not be able to use , and then we will move on to the topic that you mentioned ballistic missiles. it seems to me that russia is simply preparing to defend itself on completely different fronts. now , because it is afraid of the fact that its borders will become contiguous and some republics within russia will ask for independence, mr. romanyuk, it is possible in relation to the elections of 70 years, er, the experience of 70 years shows that the middle of the president's term is interim elections are always lost by the presidential party, this is a

norm that has never been questioned, that is, from this point of view, i agree with the majority of the positions of my colleagues who expressed that the changes that took place in the schedule of republicans and democrats are not capable of influencing the general attitude of the united states of america towards ukraine before the conflict with russia and what's more, if we don't watch foxy news, then the rest of the american mass media, they talk about how beneficial to the states what is happening in ukraine, as far as they receive from the point of view of the prospects for the united states of america weakening russia weakening the influence of russia in many countries of the world, that is, they consider rationally what is happening in our country from our point

of view. i think that we should really be grateful and talk about what we are without that help realistically could not achieve the results we have, as far as we can count on additional help, i think that from the fact that we will ask for more it is unlikely that we will receive more, but what is happening on the front is what the armed forces are doing of ukraine, in particular, what is being liberated will be the liberated part of the kherson region, the city of kherson - this is the main argument that will influence the increase in aid to ukraine both from the united states of america and from other european countries, because the argument that we are defending the west is present, but it is not so basic from the point of view of analysts who study the situation that is happening in connection with russia's aggression against ukraine, the main

argument of the importance of ukraine's position and the strength of ukraine that we are fighting is that if russia wins it destroys the international order that has existed for 45 years, and the cost of this destruction is extremely huge, and therefore it is not in the interests of any normal democratic country to allow it. mykhailo tsymbalyuk was, in fact, we must remember well that no one in the world owes us anything and this is reality because we were not protected or helped by the budapest memorandum and other international documents that ukraine signed on february 24, if the ukrainian armed forces had not demonstrated that we are capable of protecting our land and fight against the russians, i'm sorry, no one would have given us a penny, it's really the merit

of the ukrainian people, the armed forces and other military formations gave us a chance that they began to provide us with weapons, they began to provide assistance, honor praise for this, but the ukrainian government and all of us should remember that the money allocated to us and that aid will be under great scrutiny, that they will check us because it is not our money, it is clear and we should really thank and be reciprocated . of sanctions pressure on russia and they say and you figure out how much russian capital is still working in ukraine, how many energy-important enterprises are still owned by the russians, this is what we need to figure out, this is really our homework, but they talked about the negotiations, mr. mykolay, everyone else,

well, i'm sorry, every war it ends with negotiations , another thing is that the terms of the negotiations should not be settled , rather, they should be settled when all ukrainian territories are liberated, the president is talking about it, and the military is talking about it then of course, it is necessary to demand and document them in the donetsk region and luhansk oblast, correctly , and crimea unequivocally only then and then, but by that time we must be ready to show them what is documented by the international tribunal, all other things must also be prepared for this, and it is about in fact, the 20th is still important because we have to convince international partners about the reconstruction already after the victory of the country, when we win, then it must be rebuilt, we must also ask to be convinced that

they gave money, and there is also a question about the exclusion of russia from the twenty, because in the statute, unfortunately, as far as i know, there is no such option, there is an option regarding acceptance from the twenty . the un, especially all international institutions, such as the osce, the council of europe, etc., and the main thing is that after our victory, such processes will also take place in many world-scale organizations regarding the conflict. that there will be no wavering, no flag raising, no flinching in support of the usa, and well, in

principle, it is clear from these words that their position is clear, and we believe in it, and we actually support it. thank you , mr. batenko . thank you. the negotiation process will result in peace or armistice victory victory so definitely someone will lose someone will win but it will either end in peace or an armistice because it will go to korea still in a state of war with the north korea, well, japan, there is no peace treaty with the ussr after the 45th year. and now the russian federation is not going to sign a peace treaty with russia, but on the contrary, it supports ukraine even more. i am in the context of the president of the united states of america man, by the way, former heads of state who said that if we were in power, they would be in power, putin's invasion would not have happened. this is donald trump who said that if he were

the president of the united states, putin's invasion would not have happened in ukraine, he said america. that is, we are talking about that er russia er russia has actually already destroyed the world order well believe me that in fact the yalta system of law and order, which was formed after 1945, it no longer exists, we need to build a new one with you, probably the democrats and the republics will agree and i'm honest saying well, as an analyst, i don't really believe in trump's coming to power. well, everything, at least from the point of view of statistics, well, american history of the 20th century. yes, you can be wrong there in the 19th century, because there was still a party system, it was formed after there civil war dp republicans, democrats, ah, in the 20th article, the

former president never returned after one term. then the rule is written when presidents serve two terms. i mean that after one term the president has never returned, so i am an exception to nixon, who was vice president, but they are vice presidents. after losing, he returned to power. therefore, it is obvious that our externally, he is a political service, he needs to analyze this situation very decently, he needs to communicate with the new congressmen, with the representatives of the newly appointed representatives of the conservative party, with neutral people who are in the republican party and in the democratic party , that is, what we say is the support of the two parties, we say it like a story like a memorized phrase, they start with president poroshenko, to his credit, even earlier there and so on. there behind, here i am when i remember how i asked leonid a question, danyla heard leonid makarovych kravchuk with mr. mykhailo regarding the budapest e-e that anyone will be the president, he will support and so on well, but without negotiations, direct contact with those

people with the representatives of the majority in the congress with the representatives of the majority in the senate of the minority, the leader of the senate, the leader of the minority of congresses or those who are in the minority today and become the majority tomorrow, and it is obvious that when we have sufficient support, then problems in applications and problems in general relationships begin because we have dealing with elections by democracies ukraine is also an elected democracy i hope that she buys it will remain , that is, democracy and elected democracies are opposed to non- elected ones and what is called the big twenty is not a question that the leaders of the world have gathered to talk about democracy they were always going to talk about the world economy because they provide 85 % of the world economic product, 85% of the world, i.e. of course, they are not interested in talking about the democracy of china and india, brazil, argentina, and the united states of america. therefore, it is obviously possible to understand that the issue of ukraine is not a priority there

. on the agenda, well, this is logical, and also with regard to the participation of the president of ukraine. well, i understand to a certain extent that it is possible to break the big twenty now so that the specific weight of ukraine is voiced there as it should sound. although i agree with colleagues that definitely a meeting with the leader of china would be interesting and important for ukraine to understand whether we have a perspective or still a negotiation process and influence on putin through china as the beneficiary of influence on putin's bridges today the beneficiary of syntenpinia would be important for us for ukraine because he would speed up what is called forcing putin to stop military actions and ask for a more confident uh-uh negotiation process than he is asking for today. that is, we continue to hope, unfortunately, for goodwill. but in the sense that yes or otherwise, the borders in 1991 are an axiom and the president constantly repeats this. no matter what negotiations they seek , the borders in 1991 are an axiom and a closed issue on crimea, as they wanted from the very beginning 50 years ago

understood the status what should have survived this status of putin and all the other kermanovichs who started this in the antura that is, we return to the negotiation process only when russia agrees that it annexed these territories and then reparations and then the international risk. i have to judge this company , that is, next to golovko the fact that they will not discuss the role of the economic role of ukraine in the g20, we can hope for the part that ukraine will be discussed as the ukraine that influenced the change in the economic situation in europe and on the economic situation in russia, taking this blow upon itself, in fact, which is now reformatting the fact that europe cannot and does not want to depend on russian energy sources, and there the cuts will go with where the supply of oil and gas will come from, and so on, that is, some rapprochement with for example

, with the middle east. once there is one situation, then there is a change in regard to the fact that russia is economically being driven to the bottom, and how is it clear that india will not brag there that they bought energy carriers there very cheaply, but they will definitely think and to say how they will act further because, er, this freebie may end, so to speak, because russia wants to somehow remain economically strong, it is unlikely that it will succeed, and we would like this chess game to be played out somewhere in the heads of the big 20, so that to contribute to the decentralization of russia is something we have been talking about for more than a month now, and now we can talk about the economic change of the map in that geographical territory, we don't even want to call it the russian federation, but temporary

by the union of various peoples that once entered russia, and at the expense of the thesis that sounded in our victory. the neighbor is therefore a global strategy and the goal of our task is that there are many states that have already collapsed in russia, and these are today more than ever prerequisites. of course, there are many opponents in the international arena to such a scenario because they are afraid of the consequences of the collapse in russia and what will happen to in a row with nuclear weapons and control, but we understand that today a new elite is also being created in russia. yes , they have already quarreled, it's like this handsome man, it 's like kadyrov, who are dissatisfied with the results of putin's work and at any moment they

can simply eliminate him and come to an even worse contribution more radical and more aggressive and who will have a goal for themselves, the task of destroying us as a nation , as a country, therefore, the only guarantee for our security is the complete disarmament of russia, this is the reformation of many states, this is the destruction of this nepotism, this is then we can confidently say that yes, it is a guarantee of security for the future generation for our children. well , that is why the strategic short-term goal is the liberation of our territory, and there is a long-term goal that the present person just announced. we understand that this is not an easy process, but we have all the cards for this in order to we used them, we used them because the pressure should be on russia. the sanctions should be more and more. this wave will collapse and explode, including our special services must work there and

our intelligence must work and there must be our agency that must do everything to ensure that this state is overthrown once and for all because today russia alone wants to destroy us. we want to survive and there is no compromise here, because if we stop fighting, i apologize to ukraine, it won’t happen, if they stop, it’s just a war, the armed forces of ukraine are advancing on the kherson region and have liberated the snow river and dozens of villages, russia is retreating across the dnipro