indeed, by themselves, the projects can pull out, they can not pull out the economy, in the end there can be such situations when we have built an object, but nevertheless, nothing happens, so to speak, and in this case, let's say the same big airport, it's not easy you know , this kind of provincial gigantmania. yes, this is part of a big strategy to transform uh, turkey into a kind of regional, maybe a big uh, transport event, if it is implemented, then i think uh, in turkey, everyone it will work, but on the other hand, questions immediately arise regarding the economic policy itself and what we should pay attention to in order to ensure low interest rates. erdogan actually established control over the national bank, and a problem immediately arose here. it is not necessary to navigate in order to force the economy to work, ertagan in many respects as an autocratic leader, the ministers of finance themselves are often changed, what kind of ministerial horde

it certainly did not contribute to economic development , so it is about the fact that we should look at what is happening in turkey, take relevant experience, but also learn from mistakes and many things that we are talking about today, let's give cheap money, let's give low interest rates, let's something else, the example of turkey shows that it can work sometimes, even it can work very well, but in the medium and long term there are economic laws that cannot be changed and cannot be adjusted to one's wishes in we still have time to talk about turkey and ukraine. if earlier ukrainians knew about turkey mainly because of relatively affordable, cheap, democratic vacations through this system of all inclusive hotels , then uh, well, maybe because of the vegetables and fruits that appeared on our markets, and also clothes and light industry is also developed in turkey, jeans were bought from turkey. and now, uh, we know turkey better than some kind of grain corridor

, that is, turkey already through bayraktar, of course , military industry and assistance in exports of ukrainian grain, what is turkey currently doing together with ukraine or to help ukraine in the economic sphere and where does it see its leadership if we are talking about the grain agreement? means to be a mediator and to be a mediator leader if we remember the structure of the same grain agreement, turkey and the united nations on the one hand agreed with ukraine how it will all happen with on the other hand, we agreed with russia in parallel. in this way, we did not meet with russia, but through turkey, this agreement is actually implemented in these two components. and as for economic development, it is true that turkey is also mechanical engineering. turkey today also produces electric

cars . it may not be going very well, but nevertheless , so to speak, there are already certain developments , they are presenting their new issued electric cars and we will see how it all goes will happen further well, of course, the main e-e part of the main sectors of the turkish economy, more than 50%, are various kinds of services, first of all tourism, which you talked about, and some other services, and the last thing i would like to say in this motorcyclist is the fact that turkey today is trying to attract foreign investors. why? because the high level of devaluation , inflation, and so on scares away these investors a little, but on the other hand, tell me, there is also a problem related to the fact that turkey needs economic reforms, when we talk about a normal fundamental policy, the turkish example is just an example of the fact that these things cannot be neglected, and while you were in turkey,

significant economic events took place here in ukraine. i would like to know your opinion about them. maybe you have heard, well , 100% have heard and read about the fact that five ukrainian enterprises were transferred to the state department and were, in fact, nationalized, but there is no such word in our legislation as nationalized alienated shares of these enterprises were for the benefit the ministry of defense, on the one hand, there are economists who say that this is war communism, we can't do this, that it scares away investors, there are other economists who are sympathetic to this and say that it is during wartime, maybe in peacetime of course, such a decision looked wild, but we understand the times we live in and that these enterprises are needed. what do you think about this, well, in fact, the requisition, or will these factories ever be returned to the owners, or compensation by the shareholder, i would talk today about two

dimensions of this process, and i will say very briefly, the first dimension is the crisis dimension, if we recall all the past financial crises, then this was precisely the key question for the governments of many countries, what to do with large companies, system companies in certain areas when they experienced relevant difficulties as a result of the economic crisis and in the west there were two approaches, the first approach in them should be saved because if they die, the corresponding sectors will die, well, in this case, let's say the defense sector in ukraine, and on the other hand it was said that their support is a lot of money and it is possible that it is better, relatively speaking, to close it and quickly go bankrupt than to spend money on something that is even possible and will never come to life . ukraine, on the other hand, has a political moment, so to speak, but i believe that really saving enterprises, especially enterprises of the military-industrial complex, is my step, but at the same time, we should also not

forget that the state is not always good management and if we say them today these enterprises have been taken under our wing, then the question arises as to how we will work with them what will be the policy there and in general today if we talk about the public sector, it is growing very strongly in ukraine, a large part of it of the banking sector, these are state banks, which the state actually nationalized in order to save them, we have an increasing number of enterprises that are also under state management today, and from my point of view, this is to some extent can become a very dangerous trend, we have to end it. thank you for your opinion. ihor burakovsky, the head of the institute of economic research and political consultations, was on the espresso broadcast, talking about the big economic conference in turkey and turkey's place on the economic map of the world, and for ukraine as well. and i'm andriy yanitskyi with news economics on the espresso tv channel together we will win let's listen to people

suffering from rheumatism but arthritic it is impossible to get used to it it does not allow to move i tried everything and at the pharmacy i bought a yellow cream dolgit, he saves me from the pain of rheumatism, relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility in and crimea with pain in the joints and back mykola veresen vitaly portnikov and the main topics of the week is if it will be used against ukraine god forbid a really tactical nuclear weapon will definitely change the world stories problems, analysis and personalities, we are waiting for john gerbs, the former ambassador to the united states in ukraine.

september, every friday at 9:30 p.m. on espresso, the russian world has invaded ukraine, it is destroying ukrainians, in order to survive, we must defeat the inhumans all over the country together mykolaiv teenagers from the public association of dreams junior, together with the espresso tv channel, announced a fundraiser for the purchase of 200 silencers for weapons for ukrainians fighters, in turn, our polish friends from the vonstropol enterprise volunteered to invest 50% of this project for every hryvnia you send, they will give their silencers and fire extinguishers will be transferred to the front line to the military who defend ukraine on the first line of fire, let's get closer to victory together glory to ukraine watch this week's program judicial control with tetyana shustrova supporters of the russian peace how

judges defend raiding in favor of the russian oligarch's company and the danger in such a company should have been paid attention to or checked a long time ago dbr the dubious connections of colleagues and the northern commercial court of appeal with the russian federation and how prof. unsuitable servants of themis contribute to the withdrawal of capital from ukraine will not make you honest. congratulations, this is judicial control, and i am tetyana shustrova. judicial reform is underway in ukraine, which involves a complete reboot and reformatting of judicial bodies . the two highest bodies of judicial power must clean the system of unworthy representatives and until they

function justice in ukraine continues to exercise judges with dubious reputations with fortunes of unknown origin and even involved in criminal cases, today we will tell you about the trio of judges of the northern commercial court of appeal, but first, before the news , bohdan lviv, suspended from the position of judge due to the presence of russian citizenship, is trying to appeal this decision in the district administrative court of kyiv, and even more in the lawsuit. he demands not only a renewal of the position of a judge of the cassation commercial court, but to collect in his favor the amount of the average monthly salary during the period of forced absenteeism, the district administrative court kyiv, to which lviv appealed with a lawsuit, is known for questionable decisions in particular in favor of russia, so according to experts, the probability that the court

will again play along with the aggressor country is very high, meanwhile, the petition to deprive bohdan lviv of ukrainian citizenship has gathered the required number of signatures and was considered by president volodymyr zelenskyi he instructed the citizenship commission to check the existence of grounds for depriving the judge of his citizenship, so in the near future we are waiting for the conclusions of the commission in kyiv according to violation of the laws and customs of war four judges from the temporarily occupied crimea are being tried. larisa likhacheva mykhailo bilousov viktor mohylyanskyi and andriy kulishov in 2014, after the occupation of the peninsula by russia, betrayed their oath and went to work for illegally created judicial bodies for eight years. they persecuted crimean tatar and pro-ukrainian activists in crimea . sentences in the name of russia deprived of liberty and fined for participation in peaceful assemblies

, criminal cases were initiated against these so-called judges for the commission of treason, since the officials are still in the temporarily occupied territory , they are being tried in absentia. the northern court of appeal is one of the most problematic in ukraine. the local ministers of themis have repeatedly found themselves at the center of loud scandals. they were involved in journalistic investigations and criminal cases. recently, the sbu and the state bureau of investigation reported suspicion judge volodymyr kuksov, who expected the capture of ukraine by the russian invaders and campaigned to support the russian peace. but he is not the only one like that commitment to the country of the terrorist that attacked ukraine with a full scale is demonstrated by other employees of this court, in particular, they continue

to rule in favor of a company with russian roots, and more on the side of a company that during the war seizes ukrainian assets through raids and is involved in a criminal case of conducting subversive financial activities against ukraine of the hills westa investment company, the company is indirectly included in the orbit of the russian-ukrainian businessman pavlo fuchs and specializes in the purchase of problematic debts of banks was repeatedly accused of raiding and was involved in a number of high-profile scandals, in particular , related to international investments. not only is this company actually the largest factoring company, a financial company that purchased loan portfolios from bankrupt ukrainian banks, well, in fact, the deposit guarantee fund believes that the security service on such the company

should have paid attention a long, long time ago. this company is gaining real leverage over ukrainian working enterprises, having the opportunity to destroy them. ukrainian law enforcement is investigating the involvement of investohillsvest proving subversive activities in ukraine for the benefit of russia

to receive a professional unfit judge she received her judicial salary every month last year it amounted to about ten thousand dollars a month lyudmila garnykh from 2016 to 2020 can be said to have simply received a salary without carrying out justice and because everything no way could pass the qualification assessment, as a result she passed everything i passed, her wealth did not decrease and her property did not decrease. and this is the third judge of the panel of judges of the northern court of appeal

with her decision, she played along with the scandalous company suspected of subversive activities against ukraine in favor of russia. boris otroyoch, like his colleague boris polyakov, actually already specializes in handling the affairs of the financial company of the hillswesta investor. over the past few years, the affairs of the company and its related firms have quite often come to the fore. consideration of the board of which he was a member of the three interesting details of the automatic distribution of the case in which investohills took land and transformer substations from the legal owners from the beginning of the judge polyakov tried with completely different judges and later, allegedly due to unforeseen and unscheduled vacations, they were replaced by a long-time acquaintance of investohill with borys otryukh and a judge with a dubious reputation lyudmila harnyk. this composition of the court was formed on the day of the

pre-trial hearing, at which the final decision was made almost instantly after a detailed investigation of the circumstances. the benefit of the scandalous pro-russian company forced the defendant in the case to turn to law enforcement agencies to check the connections of the members of the panel of judges from the hills investment from the statement of the dbr about the commission of a criminal offense in the actions of colleagues and judges, signs of high treason can be seen in the form of switching to the side of the enemy of the russian federation, because they adopted a court decision that helps such a company seize ukrainian enterprises, their property, undermine the economic security and investment attractiveness of ukraine, and most importantly, as a result of which the aggressor country through the specified pro-russian company receives additional funding for waging war against ukraine, we are

a commercial court. and we asked the judges whether did the law enforcement officers check their possible connections with a pro-russian company. please tell me whether they checked your possible connections with the pro-russian company of the hilvesta investor, mr. boris, in connection with what. because there was such a statement, i do not know about such a statement, i have no connections ties with the russian federation, that's why your question is that today you are not connected with a pro-russian investment company, no company, no, no , i don't have any connections at all. thank you. we listened to you today, we are working to

find out the presence of russian capital, this is our duty, and the judges' declarative statements contradict their own decisions by which they allow companies with russian capital to raid ukraine in the midst of a full-scale war. we hope that the court the reform and updated supreme council of justice and the supreme qualification commission of judges of ukraine will cleanse the judicial system of judges with dubious fortunes and those whose level of knowledge of the law does not allow justice to be carried out. of course from those who work in the interests of the terrorist country, for today i had all this judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova, inform us about the known facts of corruption in the judicial system, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail whose address you see on your screens, we will meet in exactly a

week all the best, we are looking for eight-year-old margarita mityunina, who disappeared in the territory not controlled by ukraine on october 5. there is information that a female collaborator tried to take the girl to the occupied crimea and then, apparently, to russia but somewhere there was a fast, they didn't let her in with someone else's child, and in the end eight-year-old margarita was left in the occupied kherson region, but where exactly and it's not clear , my aunt told me about it, the girl disappeared , she left the child somewhere at the checkpoint . the administration took boryslav and sent him to the camp. well, we understand that no one will return her. margarita michunina's parents live separately, her mother is in vinnytsia and her father is in kherson region, and it so happened that

before the war, the girl lived with her father at the beginning kherson oblast because that's where she studied at school, she was with her father during the war, the girl was studying and they didn't want to take her out of her place of residence and for her to finish school and stay with her father. everyone has their own family, and her father took her away for a period of time. vacation then took him back to school and at the beginning of the war took him back. so the war started and my mother was in the vinnytsia region. she could not come because she had a newborn and a three-month-old baby. so margarita ended up in the occupied territory of the kherson region and that is where she met the war, she lived together with her father in the boryslav district in the village of red mayak, later she met a girl of the same age there and even became friends with her, and the mother of this girl turned out to be a collaborator and at the beginning of october she decided to flee to the crimea and took with her not only

her child but also margarita when it is about renting a carpet, and a woman participated in the referendum when our armed forces began to approach this village, she decided to flee from this village and took her younger daughter and margarita with her according to the words so that she was preparing to flee to the crimea, but i know that it seems that margarita was not missed. the woman of the collaborator with her child did run away, but she left margarita. it is unknown where she was. at first, the information was that the girl was stuck at some checkpoint in nova kakhovka , and later certain details appeared and i began to contact her. i corresponded with this one, and then explained that i was the class teacher and that i wanted to know what happened to this child. so we had a little conversation, at least based on the fact that her words were information about the child, that

she is now with slava in the administration the woman who tried to take the eight-year-old margarita mityunina to the crimea assured that the child remained in the boryslav city administration, and since this territory is occupied, it is simply impossible to verify or refute this information at the moment. we are going crazy. i do not know how to return her to her father in the occupied territory. well, there is no connection no table at all. i am asking especially the residents of the boryslav district of the kherson region, who may see me now on social networks, take a close look at the photo of margarita mityunina remember this face, the girl looks plus or minus 8 years old, she has light blond hair, she is quite sociable, and has good information about herself and her relatives, and the woman is already an adult, she is a year old, that is, she knows who she is, her last name, she knows her mother, father, everything knows sister, she knows everything