christman, ah, the state of florida, and there was a very close advisor, a political advisor, uh, trump was drowning in relation to only in the last 1.5 weeks, they started to quarrel with each other a little, and who is more important in the state, because there is a conflict with the sam itself in the state live now now the president there as well uh what person can say that he uh just like trump in public quite combative very much likes to fight with uh political opponents but uh quite effective as governor now now in florida and quite a lot of people encouraged to come to florida a-a a but the most important thing is i have said that for the past two years, how he spent his state a during the pandemic, and in that i think it will not be enough to explain at the edge level why he judged

various businesses so that they remained open and when the whole country was closed, and then maybe some certain topics about him for people to know, mr. andrii. and in general, your assessment of these midterm elections for senators and for the house of representatives of the united states. everyone was expecting it, and probably donald trump himself was expecting it. we talked about his announcement on november 15. a big statement. everyone was waiting for what he would say. i will become your president, vote for me in the 24th year , and this should have been preceded by some kind of success . the victory in these midterm elections, but this did not actually happen, although the republicans significantly improved their position in the american parliament. the consequences will be for the party and for trump personally,

these elections that took place on tuesday, please, those elections were very strange. and of course we have a change , a strong change against any president every time two years after the presidential election, but it is strange for the rest of the world to understand that there were so many changes this year in the congress and in the senate regarding some who refused to be in the senate until the second they sat as senators and refused another position as theirs as well as 10 years, after the population, the signature of the population, when we count how many i am in one state or another, each precinct, election precinct, and america was changed, how do we do that two years, 10 years, and then this year, some thought they could remember what was happening, but

practically, as this was the first year when the newly created precinct existed, it was very easy to ask how exactly everyone will vote the last one is the topic of the pollsters did not know before the elections, everyone tells us now that the topic of abortion is here in america it became a much higher level than people thought. and this medicine was very important for women, and when the legal proceedings ended in the supreme court, but it seems that it was even more influential now on those elections than we, as everyone thought. andrew, please elaborate a little what is the decision on reproductive freedom? it was decided in the same way in these elections in some states how they voted and what was decided basically well, almost every governor, the newly elected governor

who ran for office, what he would like to see changes in matters of reproductive affairs, rules of women , which there was a republican who said that he would like to block any procedure of this man-woman, they all lost, and there were also some referendums in individual states where all those reforms, all those referendums that supported this exercise, they all passed. and why not only the posters say when they spoke to those who voted that it was an important matter, but we also saw that those who voted as opponents of these rights almost all lost . in this matter, yes, again, the right

to reproductive freedom eh and how do you see the situation with voting on a similar issue in the united states, well, the situation is almost similar to poland in america, the decision of the supreme court in america gave eh the right to decide reproductive rights at the level of the states, yes, in poland there was a decision of the constitutional court on a very similar issue, and it was political. when mr. andrii spoke about the old people, it means that the republicans and, accordingly, the post in poland very strongly emphasized the cultural, it is a flight choice, it is necessary to support the family conservative christian values ​​and so on, and they won very much on this, and trump won on this, the democrats

actually essentially. after the decision of the supreme court and the constitutional court, respectively, e. information is important in america, everywhere in the world, economic issues are important, but in fact, basic things and basic issues that are important to people are other cultural, planning, civilizational choices, and now in america we are observing what andrii was talking about, this wave has turned in the other direction and that is why between the other democrats did not suffer such a defeat, which they preached to everyone, as if they predicted what would happen, please democrats, and the same thing is happening in e-e according to public opinion polls, opinions in poland one to one sir andriy, you mentioned that as i understood that on the eve of the elections, according to the census , the boundaries of different districts were changed by the last divisions. i thought that this only happens in ukraine when

districts are changed during the elections in order for one or another candidate to win for sure. it turns out in the states as well. and which one what position did the ukrainian issue take during these elections and election campaigns, as candidates from the two main parties of the united states, did they treat support for ukraine specifically, or did they have differences in their positions in approaches to aid to the resolution of the issue of support for a full-fledged ukraine, please, it was not possible to show that one party or the other in the debate gave more or less support to ukraine, an individual individual candidate, yes, some people said, uh, specifically on the republican side, uh, who would like to become uh, compression men most of them did not win, but such newly elected people had a subtle appeal to

trump's policy that america should be thought of first . we heard from them about their strong support for ukraine. the majority of the democrats i see are at the debate, because this topic was the first time in a long time that it was a topic in the debate, and the majority of the democrats announced their support for what biden conveyed to ukraine , so i would say that they are more supported the president than this idea in general, for sure andrii, i will ask a different question then, and for whom did the ukrainian community vote, the representatives of the ukrainian community in the united states are now republicans or democrats in these elections or was there any mainstream, did it depend on the state of residence of ukrainians, i ask, did it depend at all, because it was not only the commissar, me and the senators here in new york , the governor and the governor ran for office, we had

local elections, as well as at the state level, we had state assemblies, which are state assemblies in 17 different states in the same way and it can be said that on one level, when we voted at the federal level, it was mentioned a lot in the ukrainian press, and in our newspaper, the ukrainian-american, as some of the new, newer republicans said that america is needed here first of all, to support, but at the hospital, the levels are completely different, who to vote for here in my neighborhood, the open socialists voted very strongly for the first time, and this is not only for ukrainians, but in our community, there are poles or others who remember soviet times. it

turned out very unpleasantly. when they had local debates and talked about how much they talked about socialism here , it all depends on which state you vote in, which district. and the most important thing, i would say, is who knows their local ukrainian community, who visited our churches and so on, and i would say that the biggest work for ukrainians is not only voting, now the current period after the elections . their district that now is the time for our community to visit them and invite them to see how many ukrainians there are in their italians p andriy, the last question for you, please tell me whether

the epic with the elections, which is unfortunately traditional, including for the states, will continue not in history only about the slicing of districts will be discussed here and about various rhetorical manipulations around the counting of votes by the automated system, in particular, these are all the machines that are very often commented on, that is, will any of those who ran for office appeal to these errors and try to, well, i don't know, create an opportunity revoting this is something like well, plus here is also an important question, maybe russian interference in this and the next presidential election, you understand, the russians admitted that they themselves, rogojun, said yes, we interfered, we are included and we will please include the elections in america. yes, very, very clearly. he explained what is happening there in the world, and the most important thing is that there are no appeals where they started. unfortunately, in a larger country, the voting has not yet officially ended. and all those rules have been changed from state

to state and even at the local level, but most states have their own separate laws regarding the counting of those ballots. and the most important thing for people to understand is that there is a vote-by- mail rule specific to america's armed forces that is subject to different state laws that the states are waiting for. it took about a month for all of them to come through the mail specific to the american armed forces, as they are in japan, or others through the mail. and they came, how are the votes now in the state of colorado? will probably only have to wait for weeks until all the e-e-e tickets on which they should arrive via mail have all been received. thank you andriy

dobryanskyi, the director of communications of the ukrainian converse committee, directly from the usa in direct contact with our studio. thank you for getting up so early p andriy for participating in our program. thank you, sir. how do you evaluate the participation of the ukrainian community in the american elections. on whose side do you think the ukrainians were loyal? well, traditionally , we will say so. under donald trump, we got the first really lethal weapons, remember the history, it happened not because of javelins. maybe, but the period coincided with trump’s presidency, it is possible that they had some influence with trump, it was more difficult. let’s say this let's say that the american factors and the american we are the factors. when i spoke about the

cultural aspects of the sphere of civilizational choice in america, unfortunately, there is a very strong presence of the issue of racism and the issue of inculturation, as it is said, and places of this positive discrimination, which is called in politics, in relation to white people , let's put it this way, that is, all these factors must have influenced now, i think there is a lot of support for the democrats and for president biden personally, and i think that the support of a lot of people, as i know how many neighbors from the american and ukrainian diaspora? that's exactly what the democrats supported. although they were republicans all their lives, it can be said that now there has been a change in the attitude of democrats and republicans to russian imperialism, and therefore also to the ukrainian issue , which was traditionally believed to be the biggest hawks in the war against russia. and

now it is the democrats, that is, has the position changed or not, which means that the commitment to ukraine has changed by 180 or not? to say that there is two-party support in general is of course among the republics, but also democracy. this is a well-known letter of congressmen who called for n- until three weeks before the elections, you know , a few weeks ago when they said let's negotiate a truce and about peace and so on, that is , i am present in the two parties. at that place, we are masters of both parties and democracy, the republic is for supporting ukraine, and it was trump and it is for biden, certain fluctuations appeared when kevin mccarthy, this republican candidate for the place of ms. piles, i.e., the speaker of the fall of the representatives began to say that add to ukraine, do not give

carte blanche, that is, we will check and so on , that is, certain voices appeared, but they did not affect the general tone of the debate in america, which is very important in the polls tens of thousands of people were interviewed by the exit poll on the way out of the polling stations, and among others the question was whether you support aid, including weapons. and 70% of respondents answered that they support it very much, a huge indicator. thank you, ivana klympush sensadze joins us in the discussion of the people's deputy of ukraine, the head of the committee on the integration of ukraine into the eu, we welcome you, ms. ivanno, congratulations, how do you personally assess the consequences of the results and consequences for ukraine of these midterm elections to the american parliament, please well, i think that somewhere we can all to understand that these are the most

negative and forecasts regarding the fact that a large number of people or representatives of those wings who doubt these in the party as democrats in particular and primarily republicans regarding continuation of the need to continue aid to ukraine because these forecasts of experts and sociological surveys have not been implemented, and therefore i hope that after the final summary of the results, regardless of what the majority will be, we understand that in the council of representatives it will still be a republican majority and the question still remains with senate, but we understand that there is a potential opportunity to further ensure, through our joint work there, this bipartisan support for

ukraine, for me well, this is now key and it is it is extremely important for the perspective of what we can count on from the united states ms. ivanna, well, some of you are running elections, we can have more bold support from our american colleagues and partners. well, maybe we are talking about specific weapons. with a competitive combat range there, for example, well this is the first thing that comes to mind. do you see such a possibility? well, i would divide these questions a little bit, does it depend directly on the elections or, er, what can we, er, count on as a result of them, because i think that there will be there are certain difficulties and it will be necessary to work very hard in order for ukraine to receive such financial support, for example, from the united

states, which was already publicly promised to the administration at the moment, so it is about these one and a half billion dollars per month, which are so necessary in order to ensure our social payments within of our deficit budget of the country. when a huge part of our economy is destroyed, but as for weapons and types of weapons, you know, it seems to me that how is it developing events and how the armed forces of ukraine demonstrate a high-quality and effective use of the weapons that are provided to us and are based on the behavior of the russian federation, and as an aggressor country, at some point our colleagues will have to give us longer-range weapons and move on to providing us with tanks,

which we currently cannot agree on either in the european direction or hmm. not yet in the american direction, and i even think that it will reach the planes as well. god forbid, please comment about moscow's reaction to the situation around kherson , dmytro piskov, putin's spokesman, said the following today, he is already giving comments today that it is possible to achieve the goal of special operations through peaceful negotiations, but they are not possible now due to the position of the parties further in relation to kherson. kherson region is a subject of the russian federation, this status is enshrined in the constitution here there may be no changes. well, russia can complete the special operation after achieving the goals and with regard to the question about the humiliating departure of the russian military from kherson admin of the center of the kherson region piskov ot itsatelnaya

answered this question, that is, how did the negative offensive of the russian troops take place there, your comment is how adequate is the reaction of the kremlin, well, since it may be adequate for what is happening around kherson and for the successes, the obvious successes of the ukrainian army, please lived is absolutely the right word that, well , adequacy here cannot go at all, we see with you what uh, receiving defeat, military defeat after defeat, and the russian federation in different ways trying to save some face when the game is bad and make a good change when the game is bad. they are trying to call ukraine and blackmail ukraine now so that it agrees to the elections so that the russian federation gets a breather and so that it can

continue the attacks to ukraine and to and well , to defend in quotation marks our very self-proclaimed territories of part of the russian federation. success and obviously should not agree to this delusion that sounds from different mouths of different politicians in russia ms. ivanga and at what moment is the last question in this, at what moment should diplomats join this story already , ukrainian is meant how do you i think that diplomats should already be preparing an agreement that would provide for the capitulation of the russian federation , and they should be preparing an agreement, and the agreement should include reparations, how are we tricking the russian federation,

and other things, but when they are already speaking negotiations only when russia, or as it is in quotation marks, says that it voluntarily leaves our territories or, er, we will definitely squeeze them out of our territories thanks to our efforts, ms. ivanu, this machine from belle france is er, actually, as i understand it it was a kind of advocacy trip where we were talking about weapons for ukraine and support for the energy system. share a little about the results briefly . of ukraine yes, we are talking about weapons, and we see that

colleagues in paris, in particular, are ready to make more promises, they are moving to paris, this is something new for paris . and how it behaves, what kind of terror is the russian federation now resorting to, energy terror, and the need for help was also about the need for help to ukraine in precisely restoring the energy structure on the basis of generators and various other components for the repair of our energy attempts , the possibilities a-a feeling is the following from all of all those trips that uh-e despite the forecasts, again at the moment there is no such decline a-a

support for ukraine despite the fact that there are challenges within european countries and there was an expectation, well, so negative for us that they say public opinion will change very seriously and politicians will react to this, they will change the size and speed of providing support to ukraine , this is not happening, although this does not mean that russia does not work due to the available today, these are some other tools with public opinion in the west and we need to be constantly present to interrupt it and not let it grow, thank you for klympush-tensa for the deputy of ukraine, the head of the committee on the integration of ukraine into the european union p myroslava we have more a few minutes for you, literally on the eve of the elections in the united states, er, pansal ivan came to kyiv. well, there were such er, gossips, let's call it that, and journalistic materials

about the alleged ukrainian leadership persuaded them to at least tone down the rhetoric a little about the negotiations, er, they say don't send them so openly after the russian ship, because well, our american citizens in the european union, so to speak, they feel the consequences of this war and there are economic downturns and so on. and we want that even on yours, our citizens understood why we continue to help you financially, for example, that is, politicians have the right to vote, it's called politicians should like their people, but at that time they have to respond to security risks on the continent. in your opinion, is there really a threat that western societies will focus more on their economic and energy problems and think about their daily lives than on the security situation on the continent, on the

aggression of the russian federation against us and when this milestone can be crossed. if this happens, well , let's put it this way, this discussion of western society and western countries has already been taken. the decision of the european union refuses gave up russian gas, in what way did russia help by undermining nord stream one by one, nord stream-2, and in december, almost all of europe refuses to buy russian oil. the european economy has restructured itself to other sources of energy, gas and oil, everything is already here, that is, the decision was painfully successful, because it is connected with the transition of the entire economic system, it is 500 million people, the second economy of the world when you take into account

the european union must be deployed. this ship is never easy to succeed, but this decision is already up to the european societies and european states. now regarding the salvan and the arrival, i watched the ukrainians with a little surprise , because the reading of the message is different, who said what in what context, and so on. well, today an article revealed everything, in fact, in the new york times , it is being discussed and i didn’t read it, they revealed it. i got up in the morning and finally read what sullivan biden was talking about, and it turns out that the times wrote that extreme turns out to be about talks about ukraine entering peace talks, there is general miley, and a salvo from biden is on it. on the threshold, well, this is nonsense . i'm sorry . this is to keep the line, because in

new york there, everyone is specific, they were always in favor of this, to conduct negotiations, even an editorial appeared at the beginning of july when macron also started to speak, that is, the newspapers i are just as politically polluted, there is no objectively like the example of metro in sever, and to say this objectively, everyone has a political view of what they have the right to, of course, but there is a limit to what is permissible. sullivan's arrival was connected with something else. in fact, the americans knew that the russians would withdraw from the right bank of the dnieper from kherson, conditionally but the russian propagandists also said this and the process itself told biden to refrain from withdrawing from the right bank until the elections so as not to make a gift to biden in order to thereby support his friend trump and the trumpists in the midterm elections that in the end, prigozhin confirmed that this game is taking place, but in the end, president

biden said that we are conciliatory, negotiations are possible when russia withdraws from the borders of ukraine from 1991. the whole point is next week, the seventh rammstein is happening yesterday, which became clear to everyone americans , that's 400 million news they give 400 million new military aid to ukraine, it is very important, it is important to read what they say . the day we need the ukrainian army, of course we would like planes, well, there would be fewer victims, less destruction, but we also have to take into account the fact that twice we stood on the verge of using nuclear weapons by putin and none of us was in the situation of the president of the united states, who has to respond to such a blow that is, we have too