if kherson is really liberated, then this will be a new important moment, because every time some territory is liberated. and this gives reasons for supporters of ukraine to say that the country must be supported and further, because you see it works. ukrainians are liberating their territory with our help. therefore, it is not something like a matter for which we throw money and the war continues and the ukrainians do not have any conditions for success there. therefore, this will also be very important, and from this side of the ocean, yes trembicny, of course they are very vocal, they will attract pay attention to yourself, resonate in the news. everyone there writes what i will say against ukraine, and we will understand immediately in the news, of course, why logically we pay attention to it all the time, but they will not be able to block or stop aid, they can make the process a little more difficult , maybe slow down the process of accepting new packages aid already after the new congress of representatives meets at the beginning of january, but there will be no stoppage of aid programs. it

is clear, but the key question is what will be included in the new packages of american aid we understand that the victory of ukraine will also be a victory for the current president of the united states, joseph biden, ms. kravchuk, please tell us about the atmosphere in the united states, well, it is extremely important for casey, in particular, it is about the supply of long-range artillery systems, how do you see the development of this situation after the elections, and from the other side can't help but ask you maybe something is happening, in particular, it is about the possible visit of president zelensky to the united states, my euro-atlantic friends they say that it would be appropriate for the ukrainian president to work out some things with representatives of the american political establishment live in the

united states, and the americans themselves know him very well. now i'm working my way through an average american house in maryland. to this family where i lived 20 years ago, i was already a schoolgirl, and actually they follow what president zelenskyi says, and mine is the father of this family. he is a navy veteran, and now tonight he is passing america, and president zelenskyi congratulated the veterans of the united states, it is actually very important that we follow such and such things, so he congratulated them in english, addressed them, i definitely cannot comment on the possibility of a visit . on the territory

of ukraine, he could be in many places, and now there are members of the big twenty, but it is obvious that the appeal is in some online format, because it is very important, so we believe and see and the army, i see that the government in ukraine and the americans. by the way, they also note that you are new to work there. i am literally returning to ukraine, and there will be a meeting of the parliament again in the same place where we sat before the beginning of the full-scale invasion. what, uh, actually, about weapons. yes, we had meetings in the testepa and there was such a small meeting in the white house.

the expert correctly said that these are all victories and what are they everywhere in the news when we win back our territories it helps a lot because they see the light at the end of the tunnel and everyone wants to support the winners and actually this is a successful offensive in the south yes kherson uh, this actually became possible not only because of the fighting spirit and uh, the excellent tactics of uh, our troops and the leadership , but also because we had khymars and we were able to break their uh, russian supply chains, so uh, they broke these all antonov crossings are winter we will rebuild nothing eh and well actually when we got the chimars so it became a game changer so you changed the rules eh rules so on the battlefield and eh we say that attacks with us do not need to hit

somewhere on the territory of russia in fact eh- well, our border is so from the kharkiv region, it is possible to deliver american weapons, which are already there, we are not going to earn it, because in fact it will undermine this support, but we need to deliver deeper to the warehouses to this territory well, there is excellent communication at all levels and we will to work, including with the newly elected congressmen, because somewhere up to 20 to 20% probably 15-20%. in general, new people will come who may not have been interested in foreign policy before, they were interested in the voters in the ideal there in arizona or in the organization and exclusively this and we will work to explain the following malestones that i see as a continuation of the budget resolution because right now this congress will no longer accept a full-fledged budget for next year, they will wait for er january when they

will come to well, the composition has already been updated on january 3. they take the oath and it will be a struggle for this resolution, the constitutional plot has been extended and that there should be additional money, because we need not only weapons , but also direct budget support, this is very important because we have a 38 billion euro budget, a budget deficit for next year, which we voted and the european commission has already collected 18 billion , we expect the same amount from the americans, but it will all be a waste of work at all levels in the parliamentary eu, at the level of the presidents , you definitely have a chaos of white contracts and offices the president and e. so we will work on it, but what would i say in the end, i have already said a lot, you understand that the republic, in fact, they have always been traditionally anti, this is the soviet union, so anti-russian, and in such a conservative traditional part, and in fact there is a good argument for convincing how to give even more so

, and support military support, all these mar, all javelines, they are produced at american factories, ugh, american jobs, and this is money allocated, well, actually from taxpayers’ funds but they also go to the american economy and to the people who work on it, the american economy will not be affected by the targeted support of ukraine here, it is absolutely correct . gives us a window of opportunity to get even more and possibly new weapons in view of what is currently happening in kherson in the kherson region, where an important psychological milestone has been passed and the territory can be defended

which the russian federation even included in its constitution as its own, there is an opportunity for us to take under fire control even a part of the crimean peninsula, in your opinion, this will contribute to the fastest possible receipt of appropriate weapons by us and how we can further intensify this process, you know, the purpose of weapons or the removal of weapons this is a matter for the administration, of course, the executive branch of the white house, the president of his administration, but uh, they decide there, now there are certain considerations, and as far as we understand, there is absolutely no such consensus although this administration is more monolithically homogeneous, that is, people there think more or less in unison about different things and like-minded people, but

still there are certain disagreements. more actively supporting ukraine more radically from the point of view of supplying weapons, in particular, but in what a saliva for which he was recently in ukraine and although formally he says in our time rhetorically that we support well and we will support so much so much is needed and the ukrainians will decide and i will also do them further and when to sit or not to sit at the negotiating table with moscow such other, but informally, we understand that in kyiv, in particular, he spoke with our leadership about when we see , well, our leadership, such an appropriate moment is possible in order to still try to hold some negotiations with russia at what stage and at which on the basis of what conditions regarding the removal of weapons, on the one hand, yes, if you don't win, you have to give more, and you don't give more, but on the other hand, they

also don't want ukraine to win very quickly and there was a total defeat of the russians, what would it be that would drive putin into a dead end, some dead end, in which he would really think about using weapons of mass destruction, perhaps because of this, he will not do it, but who knows, he has completely lost some remnants of rationality, which as an active person in international politics, therefore, everything can be expected from him he does not lose and we know this, we understand that he does not know how to lose he will probably escalate even more and then the americans will have to intervene and already strike at the russian troops in ukraine if there is, god forbid, the use of nuclear weapons on the side of russia, that is why america the white house is balancing here, it is balancing all the time between the fact that ukraine should be supported and given new weapons, but on the other hand, they do not want to push ukraine to some such things that you humiliated will be too much for russia and will cause destabilization in russia. perhaps the integration of russia somewhere or putin and his

entourage will push putin to some completely radical military actions that we have not seen in this war . relations of the odessa national university named after mechnikov well, we are approaching the topic that is to take place very soon on november 15-16 in in indonesia, the summit of the g20 will be held on the island of bali, where our president volodymyr zelenskyi has also been invited. russia has done the trick and instead of putin, the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation will go first. let us remind you what the group of 20 or simply g20 is . of journalists, the g20 or g20 is a club of countries with the most powerful and dynamic economies in the world, in addition to the

g7 countries, it includes china, argentina brazil, india, indonesia, south korea, turkey , and the republic of south africa together, they cover 85% of world gdp in the twenty created in the late 90s in response to the asian financial crisis, which significantly undermined the world economy, so as a rule, the g20 primarily discusses economic problems, but not only for example, at recent meetings, world leaders talked about the coronavirus pandemic in the health care system and migration as one of the central topics of this year's summit, which will be held on november 15-16 in indonesia will face russian aggression against ukraine and its negative economic consequences for the whole world, the aggravation of the food crisis, the rise in energy prices and accelerated inflation. in the summer, the president of indonesia, joko widodo, invited volodymyr zelenskyi to come to the summit, hoping that he would be able to sit him down at the

negotiating table with putin, but it quickly became clear that such the meeting is impossible, the ukrainian leader is likely to participate in the summit in an online format, in seven days we are completing our preparations for ukraine's possible participation in the g20 summit next week, the ukrainian position will be formed. as always, our position will correspond to the interests of global security, and vladimir putin will not go to the island of bali. the russian president until the end blackmailed the world with hunger, threatening to disrupt the grain agreement and hoped that they would sit down at the negotiating table with him. russia will definitely be represented there on at a high level well, maybe i'll go well, i'll think about it, but the plan failed and putin decided to send lavrov to the ball, thus he avoided a demonstrative boycott by non-leaders in particular, the president of the united states, joe biden , who called the russian president a war criminal, according to the information of the american media, did not

want to cross paths with putin even on the sidelines of the summit and at a joint photo session, we would like to thank our colleagues for this extremely interesting and important story, we understand that we ourselves from the g20 are one of the powerful testing grounds where not only the fate of the world will be decided, but also, in particular, the fate of our citizens, in particular , we are talking about a clear and distinct position of the states that are not part of the big seven, for example yes and which had would like to join the anti-putin pro-ukrainian coalition as strongly as possible, we understand that extremely important things will be decided at the ball, some of the countries that are part of the g20 take such a soft position, it is not defined enough in my opinion in relation to the conflict of russia against us, russia's war against us and i don't know if the

g20 summit can be a platform for us to lobby our interests and gain at least attention, but we will talk about it and not only with volodymyr gorbach, a political analyst institute of euro-atlantic cooperation, congratulations, mr. volodymyr, we are also with us, iryna friz, people's deputy of ukraine, glory to ukraine, mrs. iryna, we are glad to see you. so, mr. volodymyr, let's start the summit at the ball, which, so to speak, is accompanied by certain signals from the russian federation. their false peacemaking initiatives, but we understand that their situation is dire, so the americans throw them out of the market economy, we understand what is being done inside them and we understand that their defense, the defense order is not fulfilled. so,

this is a difficult knot, try to solve it now . well, first of all, i think it is worth saying that what we call the big twenty and in english the group of 20 and the group of 20 of the largest and most powerful economies in the world that produce there 85% of the world 's gross domestic product eh, that is, in fact, it is about the economy and the criteria for membership or participation in this organization, it is an indicator of your gdp, yes, yes, as of the beginning of the eh 22nd year, in the previous year, russia had somewhere around a trillion 200 billion eh dollars gdp and that is why, in principle, according to this criterion, it fell into the category of the largest, as in writing but i think that their criminal aggression towards ukraine will seriously, seriously hit the digital indicators, we will have to

wait, maybe not well, of course, not in that year, but not at this summit. on one thing, er, russia will no longer be a member of this group, er, and the fact that it is primarily economic and is regularly met at the level of ministers of finance and the central banks of countries. this is one thing. we already i heard that the russian president will refrain from participating according to the wording that he should be at this time according to the schedule in the kremlin. in this wording , the word "disintegration" is omitted. apparently, due to the disintegration of the treatment, he cannot afford to be available in such russia. well i don't think that pekovi has any health considerations, first of all,

how morally and ethically, he can't be the spice of leaders . because he wants to see me with your colleagues. he was there in the group of 20 in australia present, but no one wanted to talk with him, they didn't want to have lunch with him. well, we put the photo together on the far left to cut it off , perhaps if desired. and it was a serious blow . he doesn't want a repetition of this wounded moral psychological trauma, uh, he doesn't want experience more bolus feelings and therefore refuses to participate in this meeting at all well, but the most important thing is that he feels insecure and insecure, he is waiting for himself because he is drunk and, above all, recent events, for example

kherson oblast is the main fear of putin in front of such a lady. irina is russia's top 20 place in the future, and why is putin still refusing the idea of ​​going there? he is only delegating lavrov there. analyzing the situation, how important is it to him in principle to be in this a-a well, i don't know the two, if you can say so political cities at these tables with all these leaders, how does he want to return there if we are talking about the big seven and others organizations, and ms. iryna herself chooses not to go here because, first of all, it is a political fiasco of putin himself, who became the leader of the so-called neurocosmist with whom no one wants to have both personal meetings and, accordingly, general

meetings. in addition, i think that the agenda of the g20 this year which begins directly with the war between russia and ukraine actually shows that this is a global challenge not only for our country, it is a global challenge for all civilized countries. i am convinced that the russian federation, which in this method avoids its presence in this very serious forum, in fact, they sign their own incompetence, the political inability to enter into a dialogue with the members of the g20. after all, it is clear to everyone that the russian federation has become an aggressor country, a country that sponsors terrorism, a country that creates energy, food risks

for of the whole world, and which rattles off nuclear weapons despite the treaty on the non -proliferation of nuclear weapons signed by it, so i believe that it is not putin's presence at this forum that is the first turn fiasco of putin himself well, and the russian federation as a country that he er heads. thank you , mrs. irina. this is an extremely important point that you talked about. there is another extremely characteristic process to which i would like to return, mr. volodymyr. in your opinion, sullivan's visit, what did he mean, adviser of the president of the united states on matters of national security flew to kyiv, on the other hand, we regularly hear certain voices from the russian foreign ministry in particular, which seem to symbolize their false readiness to some negotiations, yes, the key issue is the

liberation of the temporarily occupied territories , we understand that the best tool for this is the armed forces of ukraine, but this is a big international negotiation process, as you see it now. i think it hasn't started yet. well, maybe we'll see it someday, but for now we're watching more of the events on the battlefield than we might be able to decipher something there. behind-the-scenes negotiations, we actually at this moment, well, almost nothing is known about the visit of jake sullivan to kyiv. of course, the event that er needs a certain explanation, it was probably a need for personal direct communication without any intermediaries, you would without any electronic recorders means, but what exactly was said there is unknown to me, and i think that in most of them, including the authors of conspiracy theories

, there are some negotiations in the telegram channels about shady agreements i honestly don't believe it, and i'll tell you why because i'm analyzing the interests of the united states and the interests of ukraine in this war against russian aggression. i see a complete coincidence of our interests and those of the americans. it doesn't lie in the same plane. it's necessary to somehow preserve putin's face. he didn't even have a mask for a long, long time, he didn't even rub it in. you putin from the leadership of russia is one of the best ideas, the easiest, well, the most correct, and most reliable way is to defeat him on the battlefield and not to agree with him on something in on the sidelines, i will say once again that i am not particularly interested in such a version of some final agreements about some kind of agreement behind the back of ukraine and other such

negotiations can be and are being conducted, they are being conducted at the northern level. between uh, well, not at the highest political level, there are contacts, you can call it a race, let's talk about humanitarian issues, uh, regarding political regulation, between the highest political level, i think that there are no such couples even for a plus mrs. iryna, accordingly, i would like to ask you about your version of the visit for ikasaliva, we do not understand that the positions of the united states and the positions of ukraine coincide, but it is not for nothing that putin - then zakharova, then there is someone else there, forgive me, lord, the laurel and so on and so on and all their lies, lying , the kremlin's time from time to time he sends certain messages that they would be ready for negotiations,

and i don't know for what purpose they are doing this. i would like to hear your version, you know, yes, it will most likely be the real version. i think that the transit period of the russian federation regarding the change of power that we talked about there for the last two or three years actually came to an end, and it seems to me that sullivan is probably trying to find those people in the russian federation with whom you can go to the negotiation process without putin that is, from my point of view - this is the kind of political life that mr. putin is already nearing the end of, and sullivan is probably looking for people with whom it is really worth conducting negotiations, who will behave in a different way, not like putin, or whether ukraine is getting along

, ukraine is definitely not okay with that that you and i know that as long as the russian federation as a conglomerate exists on the geographical map of the world, we will always have a threat on our borders because the russian federation, whoever leads it, from my point of view, will always seek to again return ukraine to its imperial eagle, therefore, any negotiations, any negotiations there regarding the adoption of some kind of temporary truce, it will actually be exclusively temporary, and we must always be ready to fight back against the russian federation if it remains as state to exist permanently because it does not calm down and anyone will lead this conglomerate. in fact, everyone will follow these imperial narratives in order to return ukraine directly to the borders of the former

ussr. well, there is another important vika, and the player who is now very important in the region is, of course, turkey, and the president of this country, erdogan, said that the anchor continues its diplomatic efforts to mediate between warring ukraine and russia, and actually russian troops are leaving kherson and this a positive, important decision, said verdogan at the briefing after moscow announced the fare , i.e. from kherson, which is now obviously happening. literally earlier, he called on putin during telephone conversations to withdraw his troops from ukraine, this is partly happening now. please tell me how it is changing. i don’t know how erdoğan’s position is now of a leader in the region turkey is actually a regional leader and the proposal of president

erdoğan is, in principle, being strengthened, but he positions himself as a mediator, a peacemaker, but a mediator can even uh. well, with me, there is such a mediator with whom a russian russian leader or a dictator is reckoned with, he is forced to reckon with because everything - after all, turkey is a power both economically and politically and the main military security, especially in the black sea, which is very important for the russians, as well as the control of the straits of the e-e fleets of the passage of russian ships through those straits, including military ones, and so on , unlike lukashenko, putin is forced to count, and that is why he perceives him as a mediator, but on the other hand, i really liked erdoğan's firm firm formulation, i will leave saying that russia in principle must leave the territory of ukraine and then it will be possible to

agree on something new already in ugu about the future, the condition is that the russians must withdraw their troops from the territory of ukraine, there was even a sound of surveillance, even of such an important of the most influential for for it if very serious well what they come out came out today granddaughters from the right bank of the kherson region wrote still the beginning of the process i think that not all commentators and the mediator that is, the turkish will only fly further gestures of goodwill because maneuvers from such a negative or as in we have a cognitive mood here ms. iryna the owner of the borders thank you ms. iryna , please take a minute for you, yes, look at it from my point of view, mr. putin did everything to ensure that russia as a country has such global weight, political weight in fact, not only turkey, but also china, lost on this gain - in fact,

not only turkey, but also china , therefore, from my point of view, mr. dogan took everything he could take for himself from this situation to the maximum, and in this way, i think that ... what is happening now in kherson, what we are all watching with you, it can be called beautifully that this is the beginning of the disintegration of the russian federation, because they quickly held a referendum and annexed the kherson region, so you and i are now witnessing the disintegration of the russian federation, for which also a separate congratulations and separately thank you to our glorious zsu. thank you, volodymyr gorbach, iryna fris, who were working now live on the espresso tv channel. well, khrystyna yatskiv and i have a solemn moment of handing over the baton to our colleagues . yes, from the newsroom, and the english do not understand each other. i always change myself.