and people voted for trump in the 16th and 20th years compared to the number of people who voted for rumni in the 12th year for mykylno and in the eighth year, she was the youngest in the fourth year in 2000, just significantly more people voted for trump, of course, the number of voters is constantly growing, but it could not grow as much as the people brought by trump who had simply never gone to the polls before, and the republican stebnysh in us believed that they needed these people, that thanks to trump, they could get victories really. now before these in the elections, more observers, even myself. i say that i was wrong. they believed that the republicans would win a very big victory and that they would be elected to the house of representatives. voters who have

no political convictions at all. this is how the village will be in its daily life. so, er, trump is defeated there. at the same time, i would say not a tight operation, because the republicans so far, well, they so far on the way to winning the elections to the house of representatives, but this victory, if it happens, well, it will definitely happen, it will be a majority so shaky, uh, it will be one, 1-2 seats, maybe three. well, no more, and even just be guided by the majority so that she could make an emphasis on some decision, it will be very, very difficult, of course, that this is actually a pyrrhic victory and this is trump's defeat , because trump nominated a lot of candidates, he supported them, he traveled all over the country in the last three weeks before the election spoke a lot and he constantly said that

this is my candidate and you vote for him. many of these candidates he voted for were stolen. that is, it is really his defeat that is very, very significant. i would say that it is not. a heavy defeat and that is why the landing party is popular. a very politician , the constructor of the republicans, he absolutely convincingly won his re-election to the position of florida electoral 20% advantage, which, by the way, means that not only republicans voted for one, not only traditional republican electoral, because in order to have such an advantage, it was necessary to run such a company significantly among voters who, again, do not have any political beliefs, he uh, so he had a message to these voters who supported him, then he is a very popular politician and considering that trump suffered such a devastating i think that until

santiz, i have every chance to argue with him about the nomination from the republican party, and now it is already observed that the republican establishment has its representatives as absolutely open, and now i say that we have to refuse from trump, see the interview last night from the governor, she is in a crisis, but i don't remember the last name - these are women, our republicans. she just openly said that our party needs to say goodbye to the people's trump, because he is leading us to defeat and to victory. well, you absolutely in plain text , republican political strategies express the same thing even in an interview with the fox tv channel, that is, what could it mean that financial donors of the republican party can simply turn away from trump and want to he receives a lot of money for his they send up to $15-20 to a political company from their ordinary supporters there. well

, if we say the game of the primordial with its tv channel, fox decides to support the landing, we will not have a chance, practically, i think that it will be, well , if imagine that the fox channel, which all republicans watch, it will be late in the day at the same time it will be very difficult for trump from the distance alone or with another candidate who may arise to argue another question and we can to talk about the normalization of america, as far as i can see, i am a small expert, but i have been observing since probably nixon, when he was still in school, i have the impression that america has become a little sick of populism, and how to

say trump is some kind of external manifestation of this diseases, and now it is in this extreme position, both in the democrats and in the republicans, they have the impression that they are beginning to be circumcised and the attraction in the whole society to such docentrism, such er, republican centrism and democratic centrism because obama was too left-wing, and trump was too right-wing, even for his own, and there and there, and now somehow we see biden is such a moderate paratrooper, such a moderate, well, such a traditional republican from a traditional democracy. this, by the way, is a more accurate assessment because he is even from the paratroopers from the very right right-wing for trump in terms of views, he is simply not like that. well, that’s just how much. is it a mistake or not a mistake regarding desantus and later with mr. in italy, desantus is a polite person who naturally accepted himself in public

in a different way than trump, i.e. he is polite, he does not publicly insult anyone, as he does there constantly in a targeted manner , he is very correct with his views, for example, he advocates a ban or one of those trips of the american right, well, well, and so on, well, i well, i’m with you later, nikolay, that these elections simply showed such an attraction of a large part of the voters to the center because you are a large part of the voters, at least it turned out that she does not want to agree to the amount of the exercise, she did not support a lot of the frankiv candidates, we need to see how many left democrats were elected to the tax representatives. i haven't analyzed them yet, there were almost 197 of them, although among them there is still such a completely ultra-left faction, which was small. well

, you have to look. well, i think that you are the number of these leftists there, the operation did not increase, and this just shows that the voters said with their votes that we, yes, we want normalization , and i don't want to live in conditions of constant confrontation between political parties , such people, such people should be elected which will do something for the country and not only deal with political scales with each other now we will go back to ukraine there were definitely 5 million scandals here now the republicans will win and everything will be closed altogether the supply of weapons, the supply of money and so on and so on, what do you say how much is this can influence i from my side i think that congratulations mm can confirm his may not

confirm that uh rumors about the death of ukrainian russian relations are greatly exaggerated and ukrainian american that is, i do not see any i i don’t see any changes, i can’t predict with this vote, what’s more, when they start saying that you will wash me off if i’m wrong, when you start saying that there will be problems with weapons and supply, then i’m not saying this to you, mr. igor, but simply to everyone, the main military lobby - industrial is the republicans and all applications of ukrainians are fulfilled by the republicans. well, i don’t know, my friends are republicans, and that’s why it may be complicated, not reduced, but some kind of financial relations, but i don’t see options for weapons in particular, because rich people are already placed on orders,

they have an agreement with the american government and they are releasing some conditional tanks and nothing will change, nothing can be terminated, especially since the republicans are precisely the people who defend the right to bear arms and say that it is ours alpha omega, i don't remember. it's some kind of second amendment or something about carrying weapons, please, mr. igor, look. well, first of all, the order for weapons is given by the company to the ministry of defense, that is, the pentagon. that is, it is the executive authorities who deal with this. but the money specifically looks like this, that is, the government can buy weapons when there is money from the budget, the budget is approved by congress, i don’t think that what will happen now. well, many of us were afraid that if very, very many far-right republicans would be elected to the house of representatives that they will have such a large

influence that they will be able to interfere with the adoption of the budget, or the allocated budget allocation for aid in ukraine after the elections. i think that this will not happen even if it is republicans will be this shaky majority, and even though the speaker of the future is a republican, if you told the dances, later a small majority of them will be the speaker, it will depend on these rightists, but at the same time, he will decide what he puts to the vote, what they put, and i think that dan uses it, and he will be able to negotiate with him so that you can simply adopt the relevant budget articles on a two-party basis, which er, which means aid to ukraine . that is, it is a weapon, it is money, er, to help the ukrainian budget, it is humanitarian aid because among the democrats, well, all the latest

aid packages, when god allocated the budget, supported democracy unanimously, and the centers of the style of libya, the ultra-fines voted for them. that was in may and when the temporary budget was adopted. today, i am now in september . they took their electronic position that they would have any additional applications for defense anyway, no matter how there will be a very large majority of democrats , so the majority of republicans who will to support aid to ukraine, that is why i think that this danger is potential, which was there before the elections, it has disappeared, now it is gone, to the point that the prices of the congress, which will return to the session next week, how will it work until january 3. it must adopt a permanent budget for the next financial year, which includes 50 billion this is aid to ukraine and it is expenses related

to the war, let's say for the stay of additional american troops in europe, etc., that is, the number can just provide funding for aid to ukraine. for next year, i think that since the elections are over, it shows that the next congress will not be there, there will be no such opposition there, there will be those who are against the current congress, but they will be in the minority, that is, there is no such danger anymore, and with regard to kherson, people living in the united states, this morning on the internet, they bought their newspapers. maybe someone already knows the words kherson. they are aware. there is some kind of reaction to how important it is to them.

of the ukrainian authorities over the city, the regional city of kherson, this is important, and despite the fact that 90% of the american hotel, let's say the news that it is dedicated to the elections, burning their results and the forecast of how, until the end, there will be elections for the senate , but with these kherson, of course, she is present for example, at this hour this morning, there was already a report from the snowmobile of a correspondent of sigeneng, and people are interested in it, people are watching, even if we had a lecture yesterday, students asked what was going on , that is, people are interested in it, of course americans know what kherson is. what is its significance, and i think that there will be more about it in the evening newscasts, and there was

more . the americans will understand how important it is, and that's why they know it well here. what is kherson , that is, they know absolutely exactly. that is, it also means, among other things, that when you say today in the city of new york or in the city of los angeles or in the city of chicago i'm from ukraine, you won't be questioned, it's somewhere in russia, it's not exclusively in new york, they landed themselves, it started, look exactly, i'll give you an example , i'm sorry, i think that the audience will be ready to hear everything based on this. well, we had a day at the university a week ago open doors, it's just that high school seniors come with their parents to look at one university, the second, the third, just where the children choose where the children will go

, two talked with parents there without seven children , parents, let's say, some asked where i'm from when i i say that i am from ukraine, they all said it to one another, they and i support you, you are well done , ukraine, well done, we are all with ukraine, that is, of course, that of course, people know this well now, i will tell you, for example, uh, 20 years ago exactly that what are you saying, the americans could have said that the address is in ukraine, and it is far away from the country of origin. well, if it is far, then it is good now. of course, it is completely different . end of xviii

century in the struggle for america's independence, because if you use your imagination, you can imagine that association, and there they fought against colonialism, and in relation to separation from the british empire, here they are fighting against the russian empire, that is, they have it seems to me that the americans have some associations to build in themselves and that's why maybe one of the parts has some percentage of sympathy and because of also no maybe because even from the high stands of high-ranking american officials they very often repeat this thesis well, let's say at press conferences at briefings and the pentagon department emphasizes that ukraine is fighting for its freedom, for its freedom , independence, to be a free democratic

state , that is, a free part of the free world. are interested only in their own lives, well, among those people who are interested in everything, who are concerned with this. of course, ukraine is an important place. now it is occupied by people who understand well what is happening in ukraine and why it is important for the united states because the majority of the majority of the american population, according to all surveys , is not there, it does not matter, it is a democracy, a republic, internal political fumbling, it does not matter, a significant part, at least 60%. fully support ukraine on all issues and that the united states continue to help ukraine and continue to help so that ukraine wins this war. thank you, ihor eisenberg, professor of the university of jura, was in touch with us

, and we are now moving closer to the economy director of the institute of social economic transformation, transformation is an important word in my opinion, ilya is not shkadovskyi, we are in touch, i think mr. ilya is already in contact, if you are good health, good health, mr. shkadovskyi, i also want to clarify. i am also the head of the analytical e-e center more precisely , the acc network for the protection of national interests. okay , if i am not interested in the position, let's just talk about economic national interests, about this operation, nationalization, or during the war, which is absolutely incomprehensible . is there logic there or not, well, if it’s on the top, it’s like well , at this moment, when, for example, television has one well, not one well, but there are one and a half channels yes, and there is such a channel that gathers everyone, it’s clear monopolization we are

not there yes, let’s monopolize, we need a united fist, everything is clear war, but this autocrash motor sich ukrnafta this is the fact that you have not actually civilized them now, and there are various enterprises, some of which are actually unprofitable and in fact, the owners from them , in fact, come on, the owners really like one thing and the other thing, i don’t like it at all well, first of all it should be noted that the enterprise, as you absolutely rightly pointed out, they are different, rough, absolutely different, different stories about the fact that they are united by one thing, and all these enterprises are strategic for our defense, in particular, for example, if we talk about auto paint, there is a lot of equipment that is currently at the front. can be repaired by this enterprise, there are produced the parts that are necessary for them to

function as results, respectively. this approach, i would call it nationalization, it is still not nationalization is alienation with further compensation or return, as danilov directly noted that after the war, all enterprises can be returned, then the enterprise in particular, for example, motor sich, and it, as it is also strategic, is the one that produces, accordingly , necessary motors for the military-industrial complex. that is, this is also necessary in order to strengthen our defense capability and of course this is an enterprise that is related to the production of another such strategic raw material. for us it is fuel e and ukrtaknafta and ukrnafta e these enterprises belong to e-e kolomoisky and according to ukrnafta, in fact, this enterprise was state-owned because the state had 50 plus each other's shares there, but the problem was that

the management, as a result of certain agreements of the past years, was respectively from another owner, as a result, in fact, management was not carried out by the state, based on all these circumstances, and the decision that is being taken now is, i hope, because now only based on those certain logic the list of those enterprises that went to alienation, respectively. and that all these enterprises will be used for our victory to provide, respectively, the supply of raw materials for the repair of equipment for the production of the corresponding components, and how will the situation develop further, well, that is in question. that is, we will watch to what extent the state will be effective in this matter in the future, i even started writing it down to myself, you used this word in front of me , everyone knows the effectiveness of public administration. i think that a lot of ukrainians are in favor of it being

received, but world experience says that the state is bad, manages poorly, and private individuals manage better, that's the question. now we don't trust it, we suspect that the owners are doing something bad, they are not efficient, these owners, and now we have taken it all, we will find more effective state managers and they will start doing this there. what oh-oh-oh and everything will be great, that's a simple question. so when you put it this way, the owners returned to the car paint. so, you already know what others can really compensate for better . because the company has a little bit left. well, the first position is about efficiency. well, what is being managed now, if we talk about, for example, hidden oil, then the main asset is the kremenchug oil refinery, it is actually destroyed

, that is, in other words, about which it is necessary to speak, it is possible to speak, the board needs to be invested there, funds must be invested there in order for them to start working ukrnafta currently has certain restrictions on their activities, i have already said that it is under the control of individuals which in fact is not the owner, and the raw material is currently the key for our victory because, dear, we usually import, but this is of course the best way, because after all, these funds that go abroad and auto paint a-ah, here is the situation is the following that it is still on the verge of bankruptcy and that is why it is in our team at a time when we could receive a direct order from the state and the state needed this equipment, these orders were not placed for the autocrash as a result of the auto yes once brought to a sufficiently terrible state and in

this situation we can talk about a certain efficiency even if we look for some alternative. i would not say. well, of course we are talking about motor sich. well , sorry about motor sich, the owner, who in fact is a traitor and supplied the corresponding components to our enemy, then here i think even without that alienation, you can talk about frankly, well, this decision is absolutely correct, i hope . orders and generally launch these enterprises so that they work for defense, that is, the moment if you are talking about peacetime, then in wartime the logic is a little different will work for the army well, i hope that this is the case and will be, for now this is only my assumption and based on that logic, which enterprises were

alienated from the owners, mr. ilya, one more insidious question immediately precedes the insidious question here the fact that bogoslavov, if he was the owner, i do not know personally, but the owner is not the owner, but he was in charge, he understood . deputy and this and that, and we always knew about him and met and saw him and he held a press conference, then it turns out that he is actually an agent of an enemy state, yes, i can . we still have half of the factories that are headed by agents of an enemy state, and we just ask such oh well there we didn't know us. and where is our sbu? and where is nabu? and where is the prosecutor's office

? he's just a thief, he's a criminal, i said yes, no, if he's been sitting for 20 years and everyone can see the verkhovna rada . that some specific person who works on strategic the ukrainian enterprise supplies the appropriate components for enemy countries, of course you are at the sbu, we talked for a long time about the economic units of the sbu, it is corrupt and this fringes and it was not only to milk some ukrainian businesses, this corruption manifested itself in everything, including what is now not only this enterprise, there are also other enterprises that supply strategic raw materials for the production of,

for example, airplanes for the production of military equipment of russian equipment, and the contracts were fulfilled in fact, before the start of the war, this applies to other enterprises, only now, the sbu has actually woken up , and i have a question: why do we say that? but this is a fact that is directly related to all these criminals, as far as the pro-ukrainian point of view is concerned, whether they have sold out or whether they are just corruptors or whether they are in fact fulfilled the order and, for example, such a purge did not happen after 2014, and it did not actually happen, and now, only in 2022 , when the war is already here and when our boys are dying, i see a certain awakening, therefore, with your statement,

i completely agree with many many people knew about it, they talked about such cooperation, about such supplies, about the fact that they bypass that, and this is by the way, our foreign partners also asked questions, you make claims to us, and what are you doing in your country, which annexed the territory and, according what is the war and you continue there? i ask you to cooperate in quite sensitive areas. well, i apologize, in principle , i wanted to sell enterprises to the chinese people's republic. this did not cause an allergy in the bright government as such. we heard a few weeks before the end of the war that we should emulate the experience of the communist party of china. we now see when our deputies who wanted to fly to taiwan stop and say that you can spoil our relations with the people's republic of china, well , a person who has relations with china has one leg in russia, even if it is in the spada regime, you can really call it by your names. well, the

only thing i want to say is that it is not a fact that the final buyers were the chinese, but in connection with the fact that it was impossible to sell directly to the russians, based on a certain information noise and why exactly the russians at one time were very indignant why the chinese were not sold, then in this agreement rather than the chinese there is only a gasket and the main shoes and all the information that is located at this enterprise could have been the enterprise itself directly to the russians, the chinese themselves, let's say, did not cause such indignation, that is, they did not have such information. well, let's say, it did not pass in their mass media, and if we are talking about a strategic enterprise, then the question is why, most likely, based on such a vision, the main bohdan buns and the purchase of this enterprise were after all, the russians were their strategic interests, mr. ilya, one more important question seems to me. and who will

investigate all of this whole series of problems, because you say that it is necessary to turn to the security service of ukraine where they were the eyes of the sbu, where were the ears of the sbu? and who will investigate the crimes of the sbu, if not the sbu itself? it is necessary to invite the fbi intelligence service. i don't know scotland yard. even the prosecutor's office will start an investigation, but this is yesterday's classmates. they were sitting next to each other somewhere in the law academy, and now vasya, you have to investigate petya and petya. says vasya, you're better off . let's drink vodka, i'll give you another million so that you forget my name "what should i do? i will answer you." i will answer precisely because of that