it's changing anyway. i smeared dolgit in the morning. now let dolgit cream relieve pain, reduce swelling and improve joint mobility, because the joints are already broken by the only yellow cream for joint and back pain . order dolgit cream 100 g with a 20% discount on the pharmacy website 911.ua.

america, other western countries are attacking russia and defending themselves, and everyone is now commenting on it. you see how dogan supported putin, speaking russian propaganda slogans, on the one hand, showing the other side, everyone is being killed. the organization of the ecclesiastical resci of the country, that is, in fact, of the former soviet republics where the huge influence of russia and russia is of course very disliked when the head of the people's republic of china sizinpir or the president of turkey erdoğan are essentially pushing everyone out of what they call

their traditional sphere of influence, what to say exactly how this is what the kremlin says , it's a soft phone oh, central asia - it's soft connected, i don't even know how to translate it, you have to think, but because for me it's established an expression and that means a cardigan straight to this underbelly came to teach people about life, moreover, they announced that the turkish republic of northern cyprus , which is recognized only by ankara, is now an observer, all organizations, russia perceives all this painfully . painkiller well, of course we want to move you here, but here we will say that you are generally quite right when you have relations with america here, calm down, you know how the wife when she takes the money and the husband says oh, you are beautiful today, like this the clothes are all beautiful and in general such a wonderful game of football is all good but there is no salary and these are known family conflicts and this is it in essence revdogan

plays such a game with putin all the time why is it profitable for us to receive money from russian oligarchs now to create russian officials to be in such a special position, we don't want to ask to quarrel, but at the same time, his interests are not putin's interests, he is simply rivals with him in many moments, this is syria, this is central asia, this is , after all, ukraine, because we must remember that the issue of crimea is a rebuke of an internal political principle in general. well, that is why he keeps putting forward this slogan of negotiations so that, first of all, the turkish voter will see that his president is a global player, but we may have seen what the press secretary of the president of the russian federation dmytro piskov said this week the goals of special operations can be achieved at the victory table. well, this means that ukraine can basically capitulate if it wants to. i think that every time these people talk about the goals of special operations, they deny any possibility diplomatic solution of problems i guessed - you also

see this perfectly more than you and i. because such statements are put on his table an hour after they are spoken, but he will talk about the possibility of negotiations until the very end, why in principle he can hope that the guys all the moment putin matures to the need for a diplomatic solution, and then he will really need some mediator of people who can be mediators between russia and ukraine, even between russia, the country, and the west, there really are almost none of them you see that everyone is now claiming this role for the future, because it is clear that these are two different camps, well , china cannot be a mediator, first of all, the united states will never agree to this, so it is exclusive, then there is too big a player who will be somewhere mediator, so he is already

lukashenko is excluded, who in principle could be a mediator, by the way, he became an aggressor, he wasted all his real chances for the future, so it remains who is erdoğan, waldogan, in a month, others will appear, this is the elimination of tarig when he becomes the prime minister of israel, i think that the first thing i will think about is the foreign policy interior; that he can act in such a role again, playing his game in the middle east , relations with russia, relations with ukraine, relations and states, he also knows how to play on such nobility, they compete because they are also there , in principle, they have nowhere to compete, but for now there is no such meat and it is not known how much it will turn out, remember that in general the mediation did not start in a bad way, but with naftalibenne, then the prime minister israel, who was in erdoğan's office at the beginning of the war, understands this too. he is watching it carefully, because it is clear that congratulations to natalie bened, he is what is called a political heavy-handed, he

will fight hard for this role to you. maybe they will reprimand you for something. keep talking, and i will tell you by the way that he may have been right in this approach, because really at some point when an intermediary will be needed, there are not many of them , but istanbul, maybe jerusalem again, if the vintarians manage to balance to a lesser extent already the vatican, because you see that pope francisco ca n't balance like dogan, it's strange well, it 's not very strange, but this somehow means, in principle, uh, all this is completely understandable to me , and i will therefore say yes, i have never been fascinated how tough as hell, i said, a politician who, on the one hand, leads an electoral country where there are elections, where there is

competition in the media and where there are opposition parties, on the other hand, in this country, power structures are traditionally stronger than democracies, on the one hand, you can write an article to the newspaper about what everything to you i don't like it on the other hand. tomorrow they will come and put you in prison for 15 years on a completely legal charge and nobody has given you a million cases in turkey now on the leader of the opposition kemal eh, eh, blood, but according to journalists, even the chief sanitary doctor of turkey, what i wanted to understand if the turkish army does not use chemical weapons in syria. they say all this, these people can’t. what can’t be washed is the tribunes, there is an opportunity . i simply remind all the time that this is not the president of macron on kanz-scholz, he is much less limited in his capabilities, so you need to

see this soberly, you need to understand that the cardigan is still with an ally of the russians, an ally will never be an ally of ukraine, he can be to a greater extent but you not until the end, he will always play his game, and there are ideas that he is still the heir of the imperial policy, and not just the policy of such an average country in eurasia. no, he is looking at turkey, and it is not in a small territory, especially after its economic reversal , as strong as the country that 100 years ago was one of the main forces of this entire world concert. and he wants to play the first violin in this concept. we always rely on turkey, at least the issue of the release of our prisoners, because turkey during of the entire war, who can and now helps the azov people in ours, and thanks to turkey, including they were real leaders. well, i say well, this is the effect of this intermediary role because in

situations, we always have to have someone as a platform where you can talk even about unpleasant things, by the way switzerland is neutral although now it is not so neutral, it is true that it is on the side of ukraine , it has become quite powerful there, at least in accepting our refugees and helping there, it cannot be such a country as a bridgehead in history switzerland had a strange political reversal again during this war, which again showed how the world had changed. switzerland really managed to maintain neutrality during quite serious bloody vii and during the second world war, but switzerland is forced to, why is it behaving like this now, it is forced to weigh its reputational risks related to the consequences of the second

world war when, in principle, it became obvious somewhere there, i know directly in 20-30 years, there 40 after world war ii that swiss economic success is largely due to the money of depositors of jewish origin from many countries who were simply killed, they kept their savings in swiss banks precisely because it was a neutral country and the swiss state managed not only to keep this money, but also to put it at the service of the swiss economy, but it wasn't their money, well, they took advantage of this situation , it doesn't look very nice, the porter - they know very well that it's not very simplified. yes, you didn't start something there payments to look for relatives, some payments from the state of israel, but this is it. the feeling that this is not exactly neutrality, the aftertaste has remained, and the swiss, who are proud of their democracy and their traditions, do not want to be such a nation, that's why let's say the current president of switzerland said his term of office is ending due to the mission of cassis, when the war began, it was a clear formula,

neutrality does not mean indifference, this is a revolutionary formula for switzerland, that's why they introduced all the sanctions introduced by the european union, they don't supply weapons, but sanctions against russia, which of course the sanctions introduced by switzerland are sometimes more of a disaster for many serious people, so-called between all the sanctions of the european union and great britain together because there all the money because you hope that this money that is in switzerland will definitely be untouchable, and here it turns out that switzerland is not ready to play this game with you, so there is nothing left but to keep the money somewhere, relatively speaking, in turkey or the united arab emirates is it somewhere or is it something they say or the risk is not a swiss banker, that is, at some point they will issue a decree and goodbye that is why the russians are very angry with the swiss, that is why they clearly told them that you are no longer a neutral country, so by the way, it is a problem of the red cross and it somehow

is trying to maneuver like that, but these are problems related to switzerland's other role, and i think that it is correct, it is said again. it is this phrase that neutrality is not indifference . it is possible to behave even as it was 88 years ago, when the concept of evil became more obvious and comprehensible, that is why there remain countries that cannot take their own democratic traditions so seriously, for which the question of reputation looks different. turkey is such a country . they said that the vatican can no longer be a place for negotiations, let's remember that this week there was a scandal with the pope, who said that the brutality of the russian army is not inherent, they say that mercenaries are only then cruel , so he told the russian people yes well, you understand here again, there are many different components here

, first of all, i am again just as i am not fascinated by president erdogan, and i am not fascinated by the french pope. i keep reminding you that these are not european popes. the pope well, there were no other popes and this is the same pope as the previous pope benedict or like pope john paul ii from the same group not from the same here he is of course he is a person of ethnic italian origin but you understand that it is not ethnic origin that determines i would say human options and positions, development is not a question of origin , it is a question of the location of civilization, the pope is really argentinian well, of course, he speaks italian very well there, his native language is always spanish, he speaks better, not worse, but he born in argentina, grew up in argentina, this is a different civilization, this is not europe, if we look at how the

latin american countries react to this war , their politicians, their public figures, many of us will discover some lanatsa there, i am. by the way, just when i started thinking about it, i started reading lana chas from time well, it is absolutely obvious that it looks different there than in europe, they treat it more neutrally for them, russia remains to some extent allies in the fight against imperialism , especially when it comes to some libya here on the american government, they do not really understand the differences between these civilizational boundaries between russia, ukraine, and what many europeans do not understand for argentina. in general, it is a very distant world for the argentine elite , it is basically all a struggle in this old europe . where are some players who are not very interesting and not very close to them playing? and the pope left this group, so for him this conflict is not a conflict of his own essence, he looks at it precisely as a

latin american of latin americans, he is absolutely sure that he must adhere to at least neutrality when it comes to conflict, the people can condemn the pontiff, after all, the pope has always been considered a dove of peace, but now it is the russian federation, not ukraine, that is breaking the peace, and he went on to say that he is a supporter of both nations, the pontiff cannot blame either nation because there are both evil people and good people in the people, this is generally the norm of christianity, the pontiff can accuse the state of aggression, he can call the leaders of this state a pillar of evil, by the way, what the pope still won't do is even more surprising than the fact that this surprises me more, this is how we were with the claims made during the second world war, one should not think that the pope blamed the german people for some reason, he did not do this and

the allies also said exactly what you are telling me now and why he will not tell that the germans have broken hearts because the germans are evil. the people can't be like that. they can't be called putin. this should be a complaint because i think that when we talk to the roman pope, tell them that the russians are evil, and they are terrible, and so on. as a nation, we do not understand me we appeal, he will not say this even under torture russia as a state and then as a dictator and putin as the head of an aggressive state this is what he should condemn and i have a question for him not only as a pontiff but as a head of state that is his direct duty the fact that he does not do this is already the number one question, but he does not do it again, i repeat, because, strangely enough, he is the head of a european latin american state, this is not done, and the president of ukraine of latin america this year is not a european the pope and he does not do this because the vatican

is located on the one hand in rome and on the other hand because it is a theocracy how strange it is in latin america and if we knew that the vatican is located in eno service or in caracas we would not be surprised and this is happening on supposedly european land, but by a person who came to this european land already very old. we found that this is not a young person, this is a very old person who has already formed as it is. diplomacy must strive for the fallen pope. he can calmly and neutrally treat the russian people like a shepherd, it is his right to heal lost souls, otherwise, if he is a priest, the pope can love russian culture and read dostoyevsky, and it is absolutely not our business to be interested in what he reads at night, but this has absolutely nothing to do with the aggressive policy of the russian federation and with the actions and statements of

vladimir putin, because what president putin says and what, by the way, patriarch kirill says it does not correspond to the christian catechism, it is essentially a direct call to evil. and if a person who is the head of the christian world from the point of view of his own idea of ​​his role does not notice these statements about evil, then this raises the question what is important to you because i want again the eyes of everything present the pope's statements did not confuse me, i do not believe that he should stand with christ and curse the russian people, this is again not his task, it is no one's task at all, i generally believe that the depopulation of the nation is what the stalinist regime did in relation to of the german people during the second world war, it leads to glaring consequences for the people themselves, which is the instrument of such a policy, although it is absolutely obvious that the germans are people of german origin, they

committed terrible crimes on the territory of the soviet union, in particular, on the territory of ukraine, which can be completely calmly compared with by russians but again, the question always arises as to whether german women who were beaten and raped by soviet soldiers were to be held responsible for these crimes, and they will be representatives, so when these people came to the territory of germany. they definitely remembered that this whole people is evil. we can do anything with them. these are not people. you can't and this is the russian way. by the way, russians behave like that. they come and perceive ukrainians as not people. it is very dangerous in the fight against a dictatorship, which turns its people into tools for fighting another, precisely through this depopulation, to turn into their analogue. i always think i told you, or maybe i didn't. the diaries of a german writer, a cadet , one of the famous german writers, he was one of the debtors of the nationalist ideology, and he was a

friend of the national-stylistic bones, and he could not be called a supporter of the allies . - it is different that soviet soldiers behave completely differently than americans, french in english. does this mean that the representatives of a specific army are still about the image of the people , that is, the output of the people or representatives of a specific the army convinced the germans that they were not people, what did not convince the americans, the english, the french, they were told that you should come and show these people the atrocities of their state, grab them by the skin and lead them like concentration camps, but they were not told that they are not people and that you didn’t they work it out for you, the soviet command itself was in a state of chaos at some point it started shooting marauders of the players but it was too late and i will tell you that i noticed one more

thing in these diaries do poles appear and poles also don’t call this author with this fingers ago what does he say that they are taking some things . they are from the ukrainian national team, well, they destroyed the germans and they rob the germans, but they do not kill them en masse, they do not rape them, well, that is, they do not have this in poland, which suffered less from the germans than the germans , no less is more, but these poles are prisoners of war, they were in german camps, they have no idea that they can do anything to a german because they respect themselves, this is a matter of self-respect, so they can take away a service or a show or something else from him well, what do they eat? they need it, we have won, we have suffered. we want these things, but they do not consider that they are a threat and go and systematically kill , and this difference between nations is a difference between

society . i think about the russians, you know me. to be honest, it doesn't really bother me and i've never particularly bothered, if i'm honest, the fate of the russian people is a selfish card. i'm worried about the fate of the ukrainian people , because i'd like the ukrainians to hold on to this war in the borders of that humanism which is generally present for european nations and which has always been destroyed here by the russians, that's how the russians appeared here. they started to do it somewhat difficult because there are emotions, there is hatred for what they are doing on our territory with our people as with to fight this, we will all need to undergo serious psychological rehabilitation in order to return to humanism. this is obvious, but it is an internal state. when i was a small child, well, a small schoolboy, i remember the catastrophe that happened in the camps

of the palestinian refugees himself risha the whole of the troops of general ariel shiron, whom i always respect and respect today as an outstanding statesman , they missed the troops of the phalanx of the helivan christians who committed a massacre, as is often the case between slaves, unfortunately, it happens between different denominations, and it turned out that for israel itself, for the world public thoughts that israel was guilty of this because it did not ensure the safety of these people, the civilian population, women and children, although it is obvious that this population should be asked whether they would they would have destroyed israel, they would have said yes. and i, too, became these women and children. this is not a matter of political views, it is a matter of the fact that you are armed with a machine gun and they are unarmed, and i remember that at that time i was listening to reports on israeli radio and the people who conducted the

reports were journalists. the israelis were aware of this because they believed that the jewish people , who found themselves here in the middle east, are losing those humanistic traditions that were inherent to them until the moment when they did not have these weapons in their hands, and something must be done in order to regain to keep this weapon and on the other hand not to turn into your own enemy because if you crush your own enemy you are actually doing what those people who shot at you for many years and not to mention the holocaust did, that is, not to be the most like that european from you are at these and at that arab who is shooting at you and this is a test for any such nation that for years felt like a victim here suddenly felt that it has so much power that it can kill everyone, but it is very important not to kill at this moment very it is important to stay within certain limits, and for me it was a very important national lesson, i

perfectly understood that even not being a citizen of israel, but being a jew, i am responsible for what happened, and that's why when the poles later asked me years later why there was history with the pogrom in the small town and two would not be in poland and why are the poles accused of this, i answered to my japanese friends that is why you are proud of the pope of the poles, ivan paul, who is the personification of humanism, we are all proud together with you, you are only proud of the pope of the poles, he is just a man who of polish origin, but you think that these are the virtues of the polish people, you should be responsible for the polish pogroms. you should feel responsible if we feel responsible for good and evil. in this way, we get our own people at a certain uh-uh, such i would say limits by deed, we know that we we want to have a fair trial so that no one is

shot on the spot so that if a ukrainian soldier enters somewhere he behaves like a person who respects the law and not like a russian soldier, we have seen how different the truth is the appearance of the ukrainian and the appearance of russian and how people feel about it, although the footage of the liberation of kherson shows the truth, and it’s absolutely nothing. now imagine the situation when people somewhere in the 1940s and 1945s greeted soviet soldiers as liberators of some kind poland or the czechs, and then this holiday of self-government began, so to speak, and it was also a shock for many people, so in this regard, i understand very well that it is very difficult, but this, by the way, is the work of the priests, not ours , by and large.

the responsibility of the nation differs from the responsibility of the state, and the head of the nation is also responsible for the fact that it is actually in this state, when reparations are assigned to the state, if it is defeated, the same operations are paid not by the abstract state, but by the nation, if you were present during the war of aggression and of your state, they they stopped her, they supported her and please, then they pay money to people who were deprived of housing and a future, but no one can kill you personally and punish you if, in principle, you simply did nothing lived because you couldn't get out of this country in an instant and even understand what was happening . that's why it's all very simple. for years, the germans paid money to the countries they occupied and destroyed, but no one made specific claims to a specific person if they didn't was a member of repressive structures, it is very important to always divide, that is the same question, they asked

vasyl bohdan about collaborators, there are people who are collaborators, who should be held accountable, who work in law enforcement structures, and so on and so on, chelyuko you they simply live in kherson or in donetsk or in luhansk, they simply live, the ukrainian state could not protect them from the occupier. they stayed at their place of residence and not everyone can go somewhere to live, everyone has money, courage , understanding what he will do in another place, people are different, you know true well, these people are not responsible for the fact that they lived in the occupied territory, those who contributed to the occupation are responsible, this is important to understand, and the same with the russians , those who contributed to the aggression, the president, the deputies of the state duma, the members of the federation council are responsible above official by the way, our favorite propagandists with you in quotation marks are kremlin propagandists, so they already spoke a little differently, if you noticed, vitalya from skabeev yesterday almost sobbed on the air that they left kherson, what will happen now, well, you already

know, the mood is not so cheerful no, we are beating the nazis and supposedly liberating our territories. and by the way, the semenians wrote such a post. i want to quote it. and for you to comment while the whole army is eating, nadezhda will end the war with the loss of the army, not only moscow, all of russia will be lost olenochko wrote here that she simply quoted him, and doesn't that mean to vitaly that they want the end of this war, i don't think, first of all , it takes a long time to understand that they, uh, mykhailo leyonovych, when he was leaving moscow, he burned it, or did they too there in kherson they destroyed everything they could , fortunately they were in time now, not wooden cities. they would have burned everything too, but later, when the russian army was alive , this russian army acted on the territory of russia against napoleon's army, what is this russian army doing in ukraine, even they were known to kutuzov

thirdly, i don't believe in me at all, i have quite simple, i said, primitive ideas about whether it is worth paying attention to people who work in russian propaganda, because in my own eyes, this russian journalism turned into big degradation and it was such the selection, let's say, i'm not familiar with skabeeva or simonyan, but with solovyov, let's say dmytro kiselev or who else is balayan, i don't remember what else i can remember, i know someone quite well, but the problem is that these people have never been to the first roles in russian journalism