it is from a person about whom they had heard very little at that time, but it was interesting to hear that the person who built this building, let's say yes. and actually it became obvious that this opinion that the architecture , especially of the 20th century, is of the soviet period of post-war modernism is nobody 's not interested, well, they found out that it is not so simple, you have such a typical charismatic hero who is interesting to listen to, it is interesting to look at him from your point of view, what are the main, typical, most striking possible features of florian yuriev, what are the uh, how is it uh to write well, first of all, for me, his music is very important, it is a conformism for us, that is , in general, the rejection of any uh-uh power structures that limit uh-uh creativity, art, if the flight of

human imagination and this is what he practiced finance throughout the period of his life, he found many different versions of the authoritarian totalitarian regime there, starting with the stable one and ending with this tyrannical post-soviet, as it were , ukrainian capitalism, which, of course, is no longer independence, which cannot be compared with those regimes that he had to go through it, but in principle he is very authoritarian, it’s still such authoritarian times, and he managed to find himself already after the soviet era, and in fact, she is such a very determined, conscious, but at the same time productive distance and resistance to everything that actually er to any if the power hierarchy of the

structure, yes, and besides. of course, this is his very unique interdisciplinarity, or how to say it. that is, his ability to work in a very large number of artistic disciplines, starting from architecture, painting, poetry, music, there the creation of musical instruments, but also theory, philosophy, and so on, that is, well, this is also of course very impressive. i can generally call it a film about the struggle of one person with a conventional system, if it is banal to say, or after all, there is not only one version of yuriy, there was only one version of yuriy, of course, fire desire , that is, at least there was a group of people who helped him in this, uh, and the initiative, the site, kyiv,

modernism, and so on. but nevertheless, we can probably say that the film is still about the struggle of man against this system, because well, first of all and in in the film, he has the experience of such a central leading role and, uh, the same in this struggle, so he is actually thanks to his participation and his inclusion in this process, uh, at the age of 88 years old, once upon a time, once upon a time, it has already started. it's so easy in principle well, this whole movement was inspired, so it was actually staged, and in the film we simply did not really possible, which well, we did not completely recreate the structure of what was happening because, well, first of all, it would be very modest, yes put in

the foreground on some er, well, in people who helped the farm to feel like that, uh, if he did what he did, that's why he can make a real impression on the film that it's a struggle of loners, well, in a sense, it wasn't like that, because we actually had very few, a small group of people, uh, it seems that you have finished filming in 2020, since the filming lasted in general, it all ends in the spring of 2010, when the tandem begins, the construction freezes, uh, everything is like that in kyiv, and this is the end of the film, and we shot the film since 2017, that is, four years from our point of view, as far as documentary is concerned highly sexual, but documentaries can be influential along with journalistic investigations. is this some kind of work for the future? we live in a country

where even journalistic investigations that are broadcast simply in prime time on the largest tv channels have very little influence on big business, on the corrupt government, and so on, that is, what to talk about documentary cinema is like me in principle well, the films i make are not about him, they do not set themselves the task of replacing , as it were, investigative journalism with anti-corruption some kind of work, that is, well, it’s clear that it didn’t make sense, well, journalists will do it better anyway. and we do something a little different, yes, in principle . directed somewhere in the future yes sometimes quite far in the future we don't even know where yes i.e. the very process of creating a documentary film from a full-length film takes

about 5 years stupid because well, even while we are making films , we do not know how the situation will change. in principle , it is now the situation with the dovzhenko center, perhaps we can draw some parallels with the plate because, well, almost everyone knows what a plate is, where is it possible, where is it located, what does it look like but by far not everyone came inside and somehow spend time there, it is not a place, let's say, for active meetings and actions, exactly the same with the dovzhenko center, eh, many ukrainians from kyiv did not understand what it was at all dovzhenka center, well, can you really see these parallels , let’s say the same thing. well, i don’t know. i would n’t agree because, after all, i will be very placenta

. to our country, which does an incredible amount of interesting things and also cares about uh, about spreading what they do, that is, about books, about events, about festivals, films, and a lot of people knew this, and it is obvious from that, at least a petition for the protection of constantino dovzhenko scored 25,000 people is another matter that the cabinet of ministers decided to even rub their shoulders. well, this is already their problem, so with the flying saucer, the situation was in principle different because there was really no electoral institution, so whatever was public and whatever happened there from time to time some things happened there that overtook modern art, but these were together, well, several times actions, in principle, it was also there concerts of avant-garde music, which were created by simply enthusiasts, once every few years, this hall has

unique acoustics, it was really a very delicate situation, about which very few people knew, that is, in this regard, it is difficult to compare, but in principle, yes, it is a shame that this film does not lose its relevance, and even the situation can be said to have become more absurd and more rigid because, well , the case dovzhenka center deals with, well, if very , very rude real estate raiding, and the people who do it, apparently, they just don't smoke. what is a film archive ? of such a status and what is it in general, what is the business of storing copies of film copies of films on film? and what to create, if they think that somewhere it will be possible to build such a storage with films, where will it be possible to store a film archive

, and this one just give the building to the developer for a jacket, then they simply have no idea what they are doing , because such films are almost impossible to build a warehouse under modern conditions, well, how can you say anyway, hmmm, this is of course, too. maybe, but still, well, if you compare these two situations one thing eh fly in there in the complex of buildings, ensembles of flying saucers, there were also very important objects there, in fact, if heritage such as, for example, the state national technical library of ukraine and with a unique collection and er scientific institutes and so on well, in principle, our state and the corrupt authorities there have somehow learned how to deal with it, i.e. relocate some library and so on, evict

the national film archive realistically, again, despite the fact that he formally does not have such a status. the fact is that he is like that. i think that what are these people? well, maybe it was all the same. people it will fly to them like a boomerang and very hard uh in the head uh if he would give them because well it's real it's uh if you try to do it then uh well it's really going to be a scandal at the wedding for the sake of construction of the residential complex or, as maryna fedyshyn says, the optimization of what the industry should stand for

to all this, while others say that you need to be calmer, not so radical, you still need to constantly go to the dialogue, although there in the state cinema they hardly want a dialogue . there is such an opinion that she is not very capable of resisting something because, after all, you have to go to witchings , you have to get funding, and still others. i am not at all sure that when i hear the word "us" in the community, they already understand what is meant by me i'm not sure what kind of tools exist as such , there are at least different types of communities, but i don't feel like i'm a part of some kind of community as such , yes, i feel like i'm part of a specific community, but i wouldn't say that if i imagine only a community i would n't say that opinions are divided, that is, i said that there are people who express some opinions on this matter

, and they are mostly already negative, and there are people who are simply afraid to open their mouths because everyone has gotten used to it over the past many years, so what -is we can’t cook costs because you have uh well, you just won’t get funding, and this is by the way , for the sake of justice, it must be said that it is not under the current situation that the state cinema started like that, but the absurdity of the first situation is that this is the fear of losing funding if the state cinema it was already possible to get rid of him in principle because they don't have any money anyway, that is, how will the movie be? it no longer finances the creation of films, it does not conduct pitchings . in the coming years, yes, some funds will be

distributed among their own, as we have known each other for a long time, but in principle, those people who now stick their tongues in the wrong place and are afraid to say anything about the situation of the state center, well, in principle, it is quite naive from their side to do this because they don't get money anyway, no matter how much they try to refuse and so on, there is simply no money, this is the saddest situation that even this does not allow people to express themselves, you say that there may be some kind of scandal, even a big one but where do you get the reasons for such optimism, because, relatively speaking, even if the dovzhenko building, the center, is squeezed out there with water, that shopping center , which well, many people think that it will be there. and what about

some international showdowns, we now have an argument that you can't rock the boat during a war, you can't criticize the government, it's a taboo. i don't understand this approach. that is, it's, of course, it's not what will happen, it's already a subject international scandal, yes, and i think that absolutely none of the more or less famous people will accept environmentalism. let's not tolerate it. how do you create yourself now because we have a war - this is absolutely for now, i think that this situation will gain more and more publicity in the international plan uh yes because uh if under the cover of war and this is exactly what they are doing under the guise of war just to steal real estate so the national channel of the archive uh calling it the optimization of the cinema industry then what kind of country will it be so that will come out of this war where taki people like kudryachuk can do such things, it is not so.

it is not very naive on their part to think that ukraine after the war will be such a place where it will be possible to simply liquidate the national film archives and sell them for commercial real estate, so of course we will rock this boat using their language and of course they are acceptable in that situation so that the test for the fact that ukraine is a fail state is confirmed so that the country is not directly a country, that is, it will not be possible to name a country that liquidates its own archive under commercial real estate, let's listen to people suffering from rheumatism. it's arthritic, it's impossible to get used to it, it doesn't allow you to move. i tried everything. and at the pharmacy, i bought a yellow dolgit cream. it saves me from pain in rheumatism,

reduces swelling and improves mobility. dolgit is the only yellow cream for pain in joints and back, the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians , victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics, serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this, people who have information and shape public opinion, people who defend ukraine and create the future right now the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict by serhiy rudenko monday through thursday at 5:10 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m. let's get a defender well, listen, the defender of ukraine can see in the dark as if it were daytime, what can i do for

kilometers around, can you move quickly, be it - what area is the body reliably protected that makes it less sensitive and more confident and looks at the enemies from a bird's eye view for 8 years in a row, you and i provide our defenders with what keeps their lives on the front line our priorities are day, night and thermal imaging optics, communication, off-road vehicles, individual protection and technical means of intelligence, join the fundraiser and let the next night be calm for everyone except the occupiers. i applied dolgit this morning. now let the dolgit cream relieve pain, reduce swelling and improve the mobility of the joints, because the joints are already broken by a single yellow cream for pain in the joints and back,

order on the website ataka 911.ua dolgit cream 100 g with a 20% discount greetings good evening my name is myroslava barchuk these are my own names joint project of ukrainian foam and tv channel espresso her today valeriy baker teacher of kyiv-mohyla and lviv business schools valeriya greetings good evening good evening today we will talk eh with valeriy baker about the future of russia and why it is important for us why it is important for us what we will experience with the scenario of the agony and collapse of russia recently valeria, i saw such a

definition given by lev rubinstein of russia he is very accurately named russia and even more valuable wilderness is somewhere like that, i imagine modern russia and here is many of our compatriots see the future next to this with this bristling wilderness as a year with crocodiles and some, for example, membership in nato or some other security system and to forget them as terrible dream you often talk about the future of russia, about the possibility of scenarios for our victory, which of them are more threatening and which are less threatening for us, to what extent do we generally depend on what will happen next with the russian federation, security is the key ukraine's priority for at least the next century , one way or another, we all dream that our children will never fight again, and even more so our

grandchildren, and that's why we should be interested in what's happening there, because the empire always returns, do you even remember star wars it started with the fact that the empire strikes back a-- the empire always returns and we see it on various examples or it returns very quickly having accumulated forces like er after the first chechen war essentially having surrendered by signing the khasayur agreements, which were essentially capitulation conditions, russia returned very quickly and in the second chechen war actually completely destroyed the independent chechen republic in a flash or a generation later, as it happened between the first and second world wars, when the humiliated and offended people want to take revenge, revenge, and movement- uh-uh, of course , those forces that offer this move to power, if we take modern russia, it is essentially an empire, is it the

last or possible? some consider it the penultimate empire of the world for us, for ukrainians. the empire of the world and it drags us into the past, because empires cannot live in the future, they themselves constantly return to the past and drag everyone around to the past, pay attention. russia is fighting for its past, in fact, for returning to its greatness, to the club of great powers, to the zones of influence, and ukraine is fighting for its future in order to become a modern modern state in order to provide its citizens with what all modern states guarantee to their citizens and that is precisely why it is important for us and by the way you are very direct i recently listened to maria's speech sakharova and here she says that, strangely enough, we are not fighting for the future, but for the past, that is, they recognize

this for their version of the world, my history, and you talk a lot about the collapse of the empire and that it is inevitable in you even have a good, very deep text called the collapse of the empire, and you say there that the collapse of the empire is inexcusable and the risks it carries are unacceptable for us, what do you mean when you talk about risks that are unacceptable for us? i want to remind everyone who watches us that at one time the west was very un-praiseworthy reacted to the collapse of the soviet union three weeks before the declaration of ukraine's independence, the then president of the united states of america george bush spoke in the verkhovna rada of ukraine calling on ukrainians to abandon any ideas about, as he said in a drunken, suicidal nationalism, and to preserve despite everything the soviet union, why was the west

so afraid of the collapse of the soviet union at that time, because the west was afraid that this process would not be peaceful , that it would be the uncontrolled spread of nuclear weapons, that it would be a huge refugee crisis that it will be a terrible bloody civil war for many years, and that is why the wisest wise leaders of the time tried to preserve the soviet union, including leonid makarovych kravchuk , the first president of ukraine, and they did so that the dismantling and dismantling of the soviet empire was peaceful, although, as we know, the russian federation made the first territorial demands on ukraine, actually on august 27, 1921, three days later, just after the declaration of independence, then the ukrainian referendum on which as we know , the idea of ​​ukraine's independence won with a huge advantage and its own economic problems convinced the russian leadership to remove these demands. but of course, the

imperial character did not go anywhere. the empire did not disappear . in the size of 1917, letting go of finland and poland, now in finland, poland is a developed, advanced state with a wealthy, happy, and a just government, and that didn’t happen, then why didn’t it happen with ukraine in 1917 in the 1920s, because then the west did not support ukrainian independence, it supported the countries of eastern europe and continued to support them in the 45th year and continued to support them in the 91st year , but only in the 901st year in fact ukrainian independence was supported by the west, russia continues to remain an empire, the russian population only according to official data, 22% of the population are not russians, but in fact, researchers say that there is twice as much of the non-russian population of russia,

that is, almost a little less than half of what researchers say this because they observe the dynamics of the decrease in the number of certain nationalities from one census to another. and it indicates that there was either a nuclear war or something so terrible or a terrible epidemic that took away half of the population. well, it cannot be simply to testify that people in the next census, russians were registered en masse in order not to lose their civil rights, because we know that these peoples are essentially oppressed and enslaved. now let's see what actually awaits russia. russia as an empire, an empire always depends on two things: money and security forces , money and the fear of handing out a little money and intimidating if you don't act like that, of course this fear is also intimidating. now there will be very little money, which means that those regions that are donors of the russian of the budget from which money is taken e and

they will take more to stay or not less e those roads that are recipients of the budget those to whom money is given give it less so that cities like moscow and st. petersburg are not affected e these cities because they are important for the authorities there there will always be money, it will never be taken away. therefore, those who have money will be taken away. we will give more to those who do not have money, and less money will no longer be the factor that keeps the empire to a heap. another factor that keeps the empire from paying is fear - it's the security forces, you know . when you already have an alternative before being beaten by er-er men er sorry for such a soviet word but er-er it continues to be relevant in russian realities and or you will be killed er-er on the ukrainian front the vast majority now chooses to be kill eh but sooner or later eh it will come to pass that this is a meat grinder for the russian troops.

so, fewer and fewer of those factors could be named. a few more factors that hold the empire together, but they are secondary and all of them, just like money, stop working little by little out of fear. in the end, the empire weakens, which there are scenarios of the development of events and which of them are good for ukraine and which are bad for ukraine, here i would first of all ask a question and what is a ukrainian victory if we follow the great theoretician of strategies without electricity, then strategy is science, strategy tells us victory this peace is better than the previous one, that is, ukrainians should have a better peace than the previous one, then this is our victory two important things follow from this : firstly, russia has already lost russia has already been defeated why because in any scenario it should not happen even if russia somehow i already know how it will hold some ukrainian territories, it does not seem likely to me, but let

's imagine that even in such scenarios, it will still not have a better peace than the previous ones, because the russian economy is destroyed, because the sanctions are not so quickly it will disappear, it has already been destroyed even if the sanctions are lifted tomorrow. it will not recover. russian human capital is terribly destroyed, all social, economic, political and cultural systems in russia are destroyed, that is, putin had to destroy his own country first in order to then proceed to the attempt to destroy ukraine, and secondly a very important conclusion for us ukrainians is that at the moment when our heroic armed forces finally clear the ukrainian territory of the last russian soldier, this is a great military victory, but it is not a final victory, peace is better than the previous one, this is a victory, so our victory is when russia will never again threaten ukraine, this is our final victory

. profitable or at least acceptable, i would say uh, at least acceptable, all scenarios are possible. there are a lot of them, they can be analyzed and this is done by specialists in lengthy texts, there are almost 20 different scenarios, but all of them uh will be combined into three large groups the first large group of scenarios is the consolidation of power the power remains strong in moscow in the kremlin or it is putin or it is putin 2:0 or putin 2:5 will continue to drive the people to war, it could be someone from the camp of liberals or pseudo-liberals, brother, let me tell you who will go to the western partner countries and say, well , i chose everything, let's quickly remove the sanctions, and the hawks will applaud because this is exactly what they strive in order to quickly restore the military-industrial complex and prepare again to gather forces to attack ukraine, we

know that the empire is coming back one way or another, whether it is the soldiers of the government or the good russians in brackets or the bad russians, does it mean a continuation of the war, either immediately or after a very small interval, these scenarios are bad for ukraine they are bad for europe and water if i bad for russians because they will continue to be killed and they will continue to suffer eh they say that it is possible in russia after the death of putin democracy, where will democracy for democracy come from? i'm sorry, mrs. miroslava, our dear viewers, we need tasks, democrats, democrats , they didn't bring something this time in russia, just like last time, there are no traditions, no institutions, uh, there is nothing that could support fair elections, even if tomorrow some pink unicorns from the planet mars occupy russia with the sole purpose of holding free elections there anyway