in establishing a dialogue between a possible dialogue between russia and ukraine, but i was personally surprised by perdogan's phrase that the entire western world is now at war with russia and that this is not an attempt to play along with russia during such serious negotiations. i think that this statement is directed to a greater extent in order to show who can be a bridge between the west and the russian federation in these difficult conditions, because if we look at the postulates of turkey's foreign policy strategy, the last three years there, well, let's take it, we won't be there 100 years in 200 years, for example, mr. erdogan advanced the thesis that today in the western world, especially in europe, there is no leader who could hold such level of negotiations. and he said, in fact, he hinted at the fact that he he is the only one who is able to restore order, he is

the most influential politician in europe and so on, and so remember what kind of relationship he had with macron and mrs. merkel and so on, i.e. there were complex relations between the states although they are members of nato eh, so this is his political positioning for of the outside world and the second is a very important aspect of the banner dogan does not want to lose the role of a mediator because turkey has clearly stated in its foreign policy strategy that this type of mediation, such as ukrainian cases such as the bostia duchyovina, as diplomatic participation in the somali settlement, and so on, transform this state from a regional leader to a global one and it is clear that they are not interested in giving someone the opportunity to be a global player

look at who the turkish side is providing weapons to, well , the bayraktar plant, which will be built. that is, it is not just, you know, an enterprise that will produce fabrics in ukraine or something else, it is a strategic enterprise of the military-industrial complex , accordingly, there will be measures to protect it in the territory where it is located . this is not a simple thing. i understand strategically, it receives engines that are actually motor sich and or our military-industrial complex will also improve the performance of these weapons. great and the second important point that should not be forgotten when we talk about turkey despite the statements made by officials, it is the fact that turkey is not interested in strengthening the russian federation in the black sea region, they

are competitors in this region and turkey was very dissatisfied with the illegal annexation of crimea in the 14th year, because the balance of power in the eu was disturbed in this region, the presence of the russian federation expanded in this region, and this does not suit them, therefore, our interests coincide, and in order to send greetings to one and the other, then president dogan can use various political statements if we return to j-20, not only about ukraine, and it’s tiring, and a lot of attention will obviously be paid to the meeting between biden and sisinpin, can these two great powers come to an agreement about how the world will develop planet e in the near future e i think that globally on all issues they will not agree, god forbid that they agree on a joint statement because there is such a

tendency at the g20 that it is very difficult to agree on the texts there in the final documents because it has to be agreed by all states, so i think that for them, the maximum they can do from this is to send a message to the fact that the states are following the path of stabilization, finding a common language, that is, such general phrases are diplomatic, but they somehow stabilize the global markets and will relieve some tension precisely for economic activity, but if you ask me there about strategic goals, for example, or about the regional vision of various issues, it is clear that they will not find a common language because the key issue here is taiwan the americans showed their leadership. during this year, china shows that it seems to be preparing for military scenarios, including that it conducts constant training there, shows its weapons, and so

on. therefore, this fundamental issue for them will not be resolved at this summit, this is clear, but the general message and just what can happen that the ukrainian case can become a certain case of reconciliation and show that there are still contradictions, but there are basic things that really china and the usa support the territorial integrity of the sovereignty of ukraine against revising the borders, china does not support this war there, and so on. that is, this can also be considered a certain stabilizing fact in the perception of where are the relations between the united states and the people's republic of china going about the united states? this was stated by the national security adviser of the us president, jake sullivan, according to him, america will continue to support ukraine and help strengthen its position at the front , let's listen to the quote, the us position does not change remains the same as six months ago, we

are doing, we will do everything possible so that ukraine's position on the battlefields will only strengthen, we will do everything possible so that ukraine's position on the battlefields will only start from somewhere already x salvan, the security adviser to the us president, from us, they plan to do everything for in order to strengthen the security of ukraine, we are waiting for attack missiles. is there any hope that we will receive them, if you read the international work, the same thing is strictly true . after all, in evaluations, i am more inclined to talk about the political side, uh, i want to say something like this: the more successful our promotion, the more

support there will be, that is, from a political point of view. the important thing is, just in the context of mr. sullivan, the whole week there was just a whole media wave that he is holding negotiations there, he is just happy, he is, i am just taking the opportunity to reassure everyone that there is no treason here we can look at history even during the caribbean crisis there during many cold war crises in the usa and the soviet union there were always lines of communication just to stabilize the situation he is the national security advisor and he should have er any information about what is going on has the second largest nuclear arsenal and just as sharp jonal clearly stated that the key aspect was the issue of nuclear non-proliferation and sullivan conveyed the message that the

russians should not use any weapons of mass destruction destruction in relation to ukraine, that is, he warned about the consequences and the third key thing that many did not want to see in the volstrid magazine material that mr. sullivan did not in any way discuss the ukrainian case with the russian side, that is, nothing about ukraine without ukraine, this and the principle remains absolutely today pure and unchangeable, and that's why we have to be careful here too. when someone tries to impose something on us due to incorrect translation in many primary sources, but these stories appear for a reason. are you also inclined to think that this the russian information operation is a story about the fact that it seems that america has agreed that russia will go with a certain territory like this or even free all the occupied except for crimea, and for this the current moscow rulers get peace and the opportunity to continue to rule. in fact,

several influential information sources use it's because of the lobbyists, i don't want the media to sue you later, but in principle, when you monitor the western press, it's all clear, and they talk about rashytsky very strongly. are different from adequate ones, so it is very easy to calculate them, but they are doing it for what, that is, they are putting forward a certain thesis in order to start a dialogue with them there as european partners. and here you see the americans are forcing you to send weapons to ukraine, and they are talking to us in parallel, trying to do something come to an agreement and you are deepening the war more america is far away and you are close let's go well this is what sells you expensive gas and you are our cheap gas absolutely this is done with one goal this is exactly the western european direction then, conditionally speaking, such a beautiful

state as hungary is included, it starts, but you saw what data was leaked, and according to the intelligence data of our diplomats, it begins. that is, this is a well- established scheme, and the second is that they are trying to er, to separate the unity within ukraine, that is, today a unique situation when the military-political leadership of the state has a colossal unity with the people and a desire to defend and protect their state within the borders of 1991, and they very strongly throw all these things into the ukrainian information space many people who consider themselves experts and top bloggers who picked it up, some specifically, some not specifically, it's hard for me to say , but they actually produced an information agenda for the benefit of ukraine, to put it mildly , and here are these two tasks, two tasks they are trying to do just that after all, due to the manipulation of

primary sources to use to achieve their goals, the american and european partners say that only ukraine, only ukraine will determine when to sit down at the negotiating table only on the facts the ukrainian armed forces will decide when to stop . we will stop at the borders of 1991, but ukraine will remain the same in the face of the enemy who will be from that side. does the world understand that without the support of the world, ukraine will not be able to hold on to its borders . and i think that this understanding is getting stronger. every day, that is, let's see, for example, what progress has been made regarding the change of our status in relations with the european union. that is, we are a candidate state for membership. that is, we have been declaring reforms there for 20 years, even we were given the maximum there was an association agreement that did not have specifics , and then in the 16th year, the european council

adopted a protocol stating that the association agreement did not begin with the possibility of granting candidate status, that is, that it was done by the military-political leadership, that is, e president in his place, the army in his place helped the state of ukraine to go through a path that had to be followed for another 20 years. that is, our status has already changed, this means deepened economic interaction, deepened political interaction and acceptance in general, here in this particular political alliance and this means that we share our security threats that can come from the east now. the word is also too much. they also have to work on changing our status because in fact we are the eastern flank of nato and restrained and restrained the rush of the rashists because we

should not forget what the ultimatum of the rashists was at the end of the xxi year, they presented the americans with the nato ultimatum to the borders of the year 1997, that is why it is important to understand it and i think that we will also see uh-uh tectonic changes just like uh-uh in the perception of nato in the promotion of our eu status in relation to the north atlantic alliance, and the third mechanism is the kyiv agreement, which was presented just in the president's office, worked out with international experts on the fact that while the eu integration is taking place in our country, after the victory of ukraine, there should be an agreement that is inclusive, unlike of the budapest memorandum, the real military-technical mechanisms for the protection of the sovereignty and independence of ukraine, and it is these three tracks that will ensure the security of ukraine, we are interesting here

information from germany itself but as far as internationals are concerned, german chancellor olafsholz continues to regularly seek advice from his predecessor angela merkel. this is reported by and and schulz - this means that he consults with many other people far beyond the boundaries of the ruling parties, first of all, we know each other for a very long time and always worked well together despite the fact that we are in different parties and it will continue like this the war in ukraine is that sholt still consults with mrs. merkel, who is known for her restrained position since the 14th year. well, if we are talking about mrs. merkel, then she has had a restrained position since 2008 , when she was one of the initiators of blocking the granting of the status of a foreign national georgia and ukraine, so

relatively speaking. well, i understand that this is not diplomatic . however, i believe that she is guilty of the aggressions that the russian federation committed against georgia. things are uh georgia did not lose its territory, but it would have been able to restore its territorial integrity and there would not have been a 14th year. for ukraine, therefore, relatively speaking, russian gas was safe for me in the post-soviet space, so i will tell you this, they can consult as much as they want, but the fundamental changes in the foreign policy of germany have already taken place. that is, i have a broadcast there, it was somehow on february 21, and then everything was going like this, that nord stream-2 was almost launched there , and they were waiting for certification, and it was clear that

the germans have completely sold this project and most likely it will be launched today nord stream-2 is stopped by the nord stream one there uh actually does not work and the germans are handing over air defense systems and other weapons that they are not ready to talk about publicly. here is a big thank you to both ukrainian diplomacy and british and american, if you remember , mr. johnson during an important meeting j7 talked a lot with mr. scholz in the summer and we can see that he persuaded him in favor of ukraine , so they can consult but the reality of foreign policy is already different after the irises transferred so e. all the more so germany thank god er-e not immediately but thank god that in time she understood er-e the same horrors of war that the russian aggressor brings to our land and still

chose the normal side of the military-technical support of ukraine, mr. anton, thank you for being with us in the studio at this late hour. thank you very much for your e-e reasoned comments, passives who were with us. well, we continue our broadcast of inflation jumps in october until the 26th. 6% - this is direct the consequence of the full-scale war of russia against ukraine. this was announced by the national bank of ukraine for matches and departments. inflation is associated with a large number of problems that appeared due to constant shelling and invasion of the russian federation, among them disruption of production and supply chains, growth of business production costs, situational increase in demand on individual goods and services, as well as a decrease in the supply of goods, however, there were other reasons, such as fluctuations in the exchange rate and worsening expectations of the population and business

the national bank noted that meat products, confectionery and food products were the most expensive, but the services sector did not become more expensive, prices for telecommunications and entertainment services, car insurance services, and beauty salon services rose more slowly. prices will be expected of ukrainians well, in the end this inflation is almost 30%, is this the limit for the ukrainian economy, we will talk about it with our esteemed guest, which direction in connection with the studio andrii idligach, doctor of economics, professor of the kyiv national university, good night polenta good night, mr. andriy, the figure of 26.6% sounds catastrophic, what can it be compared to, because ukraine has already faced such inflation, so similar, a similar level of inflation was also in the 90s, and in fact we in 2008, there was such a short-

term jump and in 2014-15, so there is nothing catastrophic. there is no current one, after all, the national bank and the government also kept hryvnia inflation within certain limits, and what will happen next a similar inflation rate of up to 30% is also expected this year. it is quite understandable and managed, after all, in the question, in addition to what was stated in your material, it is also the fact that the negative balance of foreign trade is growing, our imports are falling significantly less than the fall in exports of ukraine eh and well, and in the end, goods will also become more expensive imported goods and with the return of ukrainians, there will be a certain increase in prices in the consumer services

sector. to expect that the economy in a country that is at war there can produce the amount of goods that would allow us to reduce imports on the one hand, on the other hand, 30% inflation is a small number, but can we dream of an economic miracle of growth and economic recovery with such numbers already in the next year well, let's go if there is a victory under the condition i understand that everything is driven by the victory well, first of all, we should not expect a victory, of course the victory should take place next year, but economically it is a miracle and nothing we have to work right now, which is the key for ukraine to finally be able to do the pro-reefs were not restored as planned next year in the budget, a little more than three percent per year,

this is nothing at all, this is not the recovered economies after falling by a third this year no, we have to hold a liberal to carry out tax reform before regulation, to force the economy with money, to agree with our international partners that ukraine should have a few years of carte blanche with the total support of the european union of the big seven, this is somewhere there is an opportunity to return investments in ukraine that should be insured against war risks . investments should go now without waiting for the moment of victory. now we need money for a quick recovery, for the modernization of the energy system, the logistics system, for the launch of production in ukraine. you are absolutely right that usually countries that are at war do not can hope for independent recovery, but they should fully rely on the help of partner countries. andriyu how do you assess the last month of bullying

of the aggressor in relation to our energy structure , how did it affect the country's economy, how much was it affected in business, how will it be reflected in the near future, we can already see from the results of the current business survey, this is already the ninth wave of surveys conducted at the beginning of large-scale aggression and we see the following that a third of businesses were affected by the power outage , it is uh, it is still not as significant losses as the losses we had in march in april, but still, they are uh, but you know no matter how strange it sounds, but the internal enemy inflicts more or less greater losses on ukraine than simple missile attacks. imagine

that the tax system took away about 200 billion hryvnias from business due to the blocking of tax invoices due to unfair overpayment of income taxes, in particular, and this is now the biggest problem of business, business has already got used to shelling, it was able to find an opportunity to relax uh and uh, quickly recover from the blows, but for sure it cannot do anything against total corruption in the tax system, unfortunately, there is a lot in ukraine. there is a lot to work on, but returning to the topic of exports from ukraine. what can we do to close this gap that arose, for example, at the place of steel, we also lost azovstal and the illichan plant, that is, a large part of what brought us money at the expense of imports, it is planned to take what industry could replace it now

, first of all, i will say that ukraine is destined to be an export-oriented country, and it is precisely the increase in exports from ukraine to various markets that they say is not the european union is a priority for our economic strategy, what can it be, first of all, our transition from raw material exports to the agricultural sector, for example, to the export of finished food products. the same applies, for example, to the it sector, because in the it sector we are still a country which sells actually raw brains, raw materials. that is, we sell the working hours of our programmers and these specialists, instead of producing , creating final products and selling them all over the world, there are of course great examples like ajax spiders, which have just shown that ukraine is capable of making real products, we have

to work on this further. i am convinced that the ukrainian defense industry will not be export-oriented starting from 2023, at least these projects that we are coordinating now help us see that there is a great export potential. in the end, metallurgy will return to ukraine in ukraine, although we have now become even more suppliers of raw materials, we export waste from ukraine, but in ukraine it is not only iron ore, not only steel is titan, with which we again have some problems, instead of receiving investments, we are destroying those enterprises that are already in this industry and so on. so, ukraine will be a country of logistics processing, created end products and digitization p andriyu but if we talk about positive changes who do you think should be the russians of these

changes? small, medium-sized businesses, transnational corporations, large enterprises in ukraine. how do you feel? i feel that any attempt to find priorities in the country always fails. she does not. gives nothing but an increase in corruption when preference is given to someone. although on the one hand i am the chairman of the coalition council, there are very few small and medium-sized businesses in ukraine, but i have to say that in our country , 39% of gdp was generated by large businesses before the war. we cannot remove it from the agenda and say that only medium-sized businesses will drive the economy, no, not everyone will drive more than that. currently, a large part of the state is in the economy, so the state will be an economic player even next year, instead of a preference, we we must create economic freedoms, we must completely

change the tax system, carry out deregulation, so that any business, foreign, ukrainian, in industrial parks and outside them, in the diet and not in action, the city should have the same opportunities e-e with taxes that will stimulate the development of growth with access to finance with modern labor legislation with the possibilities of having fair regulation and non-corrupt regulation , all this will give us the opportunity to really grow at a rate of more than 10% per year. that's how it will be and 10% let it be the worst option in the year in which it will be the year of ukrainian growth, the year of the ukrainian miracle for the whole world, great passives who were with us at that time andriy dligach, doctor of economic sciences, professor of kyiv national university, then our colleagues continue the broadcast viktoriya malosvetnya and bohdan moshai, we say goodbye and

the broadcast will continue in a moment. be healthy. ukrainian gives freedom. the occupiers tighten their tails when they hear about ukrainian plyanytsya and pavlo, and we haven’t even mentioned 30-letter words we have affectionate words for everyone, we will not be destroyed, we will be protected by the power of the three forms of the future tense, we will go, we will go to victory, in spite of everything, ukrainian is the language of the free, i last saw my native donetsk in 2012, and soon the war will take almost 9 years from me the opportunity to return home at the beginning of a full-scale invasion training took a back seat from the first days i started volunteering like some of my

colleagues ukrainian gymnasts about three thousand athletes and coaches are currently baronying the independence of our country, more than 100 of them will never return home, our training halls , orders but we must not be silent we must not be silent about russia's crimes against ukraine, as russian and belarusian athletes do, their silence is support for bloody russian terror, and terrorists have no place in the international arena sports i call on all citizens of the civilized world to support ukraine on the sports front, share your posts with the company's hashtags and call for a boycott of russian and belarusian athletes kills with the support of the ministry of youth and sports of ukraine, you can believe in victory, pray for victory, donate to victory, and you can also

invest in victory and even receive profit from it, buy government military bonds. it's like a deposit, only not in a bank, but in the state and the army simply you enter into action and choose, they differ in terms of maturity from six months to one and a half years from this and the profit depends, for example , the cost of the donetsk bond is uah 1,000-23, but on the maturity date it will already be uah 1,240 they are named in honor of temporarily occupied cities and territories after all, by buying you become a sponsor of their release, make a real contribution to the economy and de-occupation and receive your interest victory military bonds work both for you and for victory