not decommunization, what to do with mr. bulgakov well, for example, with viktor nekrasov, what to do with them, they seem to be russian, and even some, like bulgakov, are considered anti-ukrainian, as i personally do not think so, but that is another story, but what to do with such anti-soviet russian people the question is, they are russians , they use a lot of russian narratives, but they are anti-and anti-soviet anti- well, russia is the center of the soviet union. honors, this is actually a difficult issue, part of it already i see is just a social consensus regarding some surnames, something for example if we take the time of

sakharov, now the ukrainian intelligentsia would rather not sort it out like that. that is, there even when it was renamed to ivano-frankivsk, this street sakharov, we will say yes, after all, the intelligentsia spoke out against sakharov’s surname being preserved in ukrainian toponyms, if there are many names of conventional er-e herzens from various decembrists of various anti-russian well anti imperial figures or anti-soviet who? well, in the majority now, those who are not suspected of any sympathy for ukraine, who were simply anti-soviet or anti-imperial figures, are they renamed anyway because they simply have no relation to the specific city where they are located, that is, what street herzena in lviv , i.e. in moscow she can be adg - this is na del lviv in lviv there are streets that can be named after them , the same applies there to kyiv kharkiv that is , we understand that we cannot name streets eh

with the names of russians because we have, strictly speaking, our ukrainian, not ours, we have our own and ukrainian toponymic space, and we have to name the street in honor of our people who have made a certain contribution there. it turns out that you and i don't know and there is no such institution that could determine it. i'm going back to nekrasov or bulgakov again. well, they didn't understand hertz, he's just not here, but these two were the best hertz in london to name a street of herzen i don’t even know maybe there are er streets of herzen but here i completely agree with you, that is, there are things er absurd yes when a person had no relationship with the whole earth and for some reason the street named a is so very complicated

moments when she had a relationship, was born, had a family, was there, did she write something here, yes, but she still had imperialism here, that is, there is no institution. we can’t say anything here at all. with with such a name or with such a name, i understand correctly, yes, currently no institution has summarized the official lists of who we leave, who we remove, that is, it all goes by itself now, relatively speaking, in some communities, uh, they leave the streets, rename the street after gogol the russians in others, on the contrary, rename gogol himself to some other names, that is, now no state institution specialized in this is engaged in this, that is, the institute of national memory, now he should be decapitated, because the shotgun is now fighting and the vast majority of such active people from the following the ministry of culture is now fighting for national memory. i'm very skeptical, i'm sure tkachenko and they are rather

sabotaging the processes. the state does not control and direct it in any way. well, then the question arises why. because i don’t either. i have the impression that they are not sabotaging . renaming the review review is there nekrasova na pupkina it is not of public interest to them, they do not think that society is interested in it and they themselves are not interested either, and that is enough, well, a bitter story eh. would you agree with such a point of view that i but now i expressed it not that they are russian spies, but just okay, now they

are interested, for example, in the dovzhenka center, i terribly don't understand this because i don't know why well, what is it all about, what is the zasadnychesk ambush? do you agree that it is not no ignoring due to such ill will and due to misunderstanding of the need to be aware of the fact that the days of communism are over, the days of soviet love for the soviet union and for the russians are over, something needs to be fundamentally and fundamentally changed, i just think that these people have not really changed the concept of what is the difference, what is the difference, what is the monument, what is the difference, what is the street, and if it is asphalted, then for them it is not a matter of principle for them, it’s just that putin has gone crazy and this is a war because putin didn’t care about you

they actually have some prerequisites for this. unfortunately, the majority do not see, that is, they do not even understand that here the russians are marking the land, what if a street in the center of kharkov, kyiv or dnipro is named the same names, the streets are named the same as in u saratov pensions , voronezh, this and the monuments become the same, this means that they mark that this is also russian land, that if the church of the moscow patriarchate in our country remains enough neutronites, it is the same, it is actually the same marker and this the sphere of influence of russia on the territory of ukraine, which marks that here and here is russian land, that is, a russian street, a russian monument, and a russian church, and a russian one. this means that this is russia, well, that's how they mark our lands. and these people who are now in power, they they just think that putin has gone crazy, that it's just that, what's the difference, we go to the moscow patriarchate ourselves, we're not afraid of walking along lomonosov and gorky

streets , everything's okay with us. soviet because it is the soviet people who say what a difference. well, this is not a criticism on my part, it’s just that, well, if you were aware of that fact, you wouldn’t do anything here. if a person lived half his life in the soviet union, he cast that soviet narrative from someone, that’s the tide. so what? you can't cut it off in any correct way. i understand that a lot of soviet still remains. well, that's the soviet sentiments that people just don't like. it 's normal for them. they're used to living in such a space, and for them it's rather a trauma to leave this from this bubble to get out of this is simple in general today it is already ukrainian, that is, they still believe that this common space with olivier, the irony of fate, with uh, conventionally speaking, with a moscow church, with a moscow

street, with pushkin's, is still left in their heads they taught at school with yesenin, that's how you can get rid of yesenin if you loved him there in your youth or there you read that pushkin and recited it in literature classes, but somehow it's already very difficult for these people to get out of it. i even meet with the fact that very often there are people who have a purely ukrainian-centric position and were even there on the participants of the evolution of dignity. but such an older generation has a huge sentiment towards all these pushkin streets up to their chests and even come out in their defense, well, that is, this also happens to people and nostalgia is difficult for people when they, for the most part, have lived in this cultural field for the majority of their lives, it is very difficult for them to get out of it, unfortunately, how is it, how to do it, how to lead these people on this road to this understanding. i want to answer the question already, i have such a

job that i start doing it 20 minutes before the end of the program. they also want to thank vadim pozniakova , co-founder of the decommunization of ukraine project, who told us here. and by the way, it is sufficiently argued that there are problems and ambiguity. i generally like such ambiguous answers to unequivocal questions because it is really the same bulgakov, well, it is difficult to accuse him of being a bad writer, but it is easy to ask that he had, to put it mildly, anti-ukrainian accents and well, people are also discussing. well, how to do it here, it is impossible to determine one thing. well

, i thank mr. vadim once again. after angela writes, after the liberation of kherson, investigate why the city was not defended at the beginning of the war, why was it captured in one day no, not after the liberation of kherson, after the liberation of all of ukraine, then there will be time for all these investigations and what will i tell you personally frankly, ms. angela, i don't believe it because ukrainians are terribly forgetful, they forget a lot of things, and not often, and in politics and journalism, we see people in history, well , there are a lot of fields where we see people who we know were there yesterday so-and-so, and tomorrow we will vote for these people again. well, how? well, we see yanukovych. well, in the fourth year, hundreds of thousands and millions of people were already standing there. let's

not elect him. it's been a few years and he was elected, so he doesn't get it very often. like that the situation in general, i have a lot of questions. i don’t know if it will be today, but they constantly ask questions that journalists who until february 20, 4, were somehow very sympathetic. and now the patriots are speaking out, that where are the questions, too, questions, so they say that they will investigate something. well, maybe and they will be, but i don't believe it at all. somehow, ukrainians don't like to do this. they mention a very narrow circle of people who are very active. these people are usually very active. they say oh, there was such a thing. let's learn. i don't know. here's the first video for the first question. it means to investigate why they did not defend at the beginning of the

war, well, there is one more point that needs to be investigated, and that is to give yourself an account of the fact that the vast majority of ukrainians, the vast majority of europeans, the vast majority of americans, until february 24th, did not believe one thing, i believed about this program i told him in time that there is no need to think that there is some kind of evil will. maybe she was there. maybe she was somewhere. maybe there wasn't somewhere. i don't know, but i am convinced that the war will end. i hope that people will come out soon . that he will attack and everyone who disagrees with him - although this is

not true, a huge number of people did not believe people, it is not typical for people to believe in the absurd. and these absurdities are us, the whole world already understands that this is absurd, except for putin , well, there are some tens of millions of russians , so what will i wouldn't like a lot of sessions , but this is kharkiv-zaporizhia - it's angela mykolaiv again in the village with s-300 missiles or a point in kherson , i haven't felt it myself yet, won't the enemy now start to take revenge for the loss of the city and shoot missiles, realizing that the ghost town is located enough the number of troops well, i don’t know, i wouldn’t do it anyway , you know. well, where do they put the number of troops? i think that you can expect everything from russia, you know, but i live in lviv, and it happens

that for almost a week, nothing arrives. well, nothing. hums even and then the chest then flies to understand why today it arrives tomorrow it does not arrive it is impossible why these territories are bombed these areas are not bombed it is impossible that is why well, you have to report to yourself that everything is possible so it is definitely possible that it will arrive and to kherson see what they think they will begin to regret there, he says, oh, how poor we were. we were there in kherson. we saw the people of kherson. they are such wonderful people. we will not shoot at them. well, the same cannot happen. therefore, everything is possible and we must prepare for the bad, hope for the good, yes. olga. please comment on the greetings of poland from on the independence day of the hungarian deputy, where he wished to return the common border, such calls threaten the territorial values ​​of ukraine, they are not isolated, on the contrary, they are systematic, they are not

systematic ms. olga, but they are submitted singly, if one deputy or a second deputy or a third deputy. well, even if there are three deputies and two deputy ministers. but if they speak for one week, we will have the complete impression that five people spoke in seven days, and the impression will be that the whole of hungary is for that to have a common border, we talked about this many times, i can repeat it once more hungary considers itself offended and if you look at the map of austria-hungary now and see how much territory was pulled back after the first world war, then after the territory of hungary during the second world war, you will understand that not only ukraine is a claimed territory, but also slovakia and

romania and many other territories are claimed by the official budapest. that's why it's fate , that's what they'll talk about now that such people are in power . in power, this means that the people supported orbán , we did not forget that he was elected in april of this year with all of those and the whole body knew his slogans of sympathy for russia, claims against ukraine and that he was elected. he did not hide it from us, he did not say it during the elections before the elections, i am putin's enemy. i love ukraine very much and they took him, and then he came to laska. and i fooled you. on the contrary, i love putin and hate ukraine . he didn't say that. i am putin's friend and i don't really sympathize with ukraine, to put it mildly, he ordered nothing of the sort he didn't say anything else, and it means

the hungarians are starting it like the hungarians like it, well, the exit of the enemy from kherson took place right after the us elections and before the g20. do you think it is somehow connected? such gestures are good will, which means yes, i quoted again the phrase attributed to freud in our winter to ivanovich, who said that he seemed to say that sometimes a banana is just a banana. therefore, it is definitely speculation , but we will see what will happen during and after the g20. they gave not long left to wait that's

why it is chronologically very similar they are very similar and now as i said yesterday and today i said that now it starts like this some such appeared brownian motion around a-a putin's ultimatum attempts to somehow to negotiate with zelensky to putin the ultimatum to putin is not to putin, but to putin, that’s how things started in kyiv, and zelensky, as if someone would betray him, i don’t think that zelensky can be pressured now, but you can advise, but there are visits by saliva to in short, there are many such moments that you can imagine such a dotted line that builds some logic and the elections of the united states and so on and so

on. there are already people who say that this is from uzbekistan in september, when putin said that let's finish there by the twenties the big one is not putin’s trip to the 20th and not the lack of an opportunity to address him simply already full no no no not personally through the television screen i.e. and how to find out if this is speculation or if it is true or if all the speculations in the future are false let’s see what will happen after the 20th after on the 20th, after the 22nd, after the 20th, something will change in the world, if something changes, then this dotted line can turn into a solid line. and if nothing changes, it means that it is. well, yesterday i told you that there is such a thing. well, there is speculation that putin has already been given conditions so that he i already have something there

you started doing something, and we don't know yet. we ca n't judge. we expect that after the retreat of the troops, the shelling of our cities will rage just in time . right here, it's already 20. what do you think of the report on popcorn stocks? est here putin is fooling around, cute, not est, that's why i'm telling me something that such a bombardment during the 20th may not be expected, it's hard for me to imagine that something will start to fly to the west, it's full of journalists now from the xiang to the don well, not home from xianu is definitely there to donetsk region to luhansk region and they will record it all and show it. and here you go for a walk. 20 leaders are sitting in front of the tv in the evening. someone is watching cnn

. that's why the high-ranking people sat down and looked at putin's behavior, and then one of the leaders said, "let's make a tough declaration. we'll accept it on the morning after the bombing of such-and-such and such-and-such a city. " he does and everything that's why i don't think exactly i don't think that there will be such and such a shooting glory to ukraine has come and a defining moment for our future many generations ahead predict the possibility and meaning of the significance of ukraine after the war years thank you dima that's right me with the editor with the editors and spoke before the program i say well, this is such a question that i will start answering now and

just in time for my upcoming meeting with vitaly portnikov. i will finish next friday, so everything depends on ukraine, everything depends on ukrainians in ukraine really have a chance to occupy a very important position in the world and this is a well-deserved position, but remember that peace is more difficult for a politician than war in war, everything is clear and they make mistakes, although it is understandable and during peace, a mistake is made because you do not know where the worlds are strange when you have a war you definitely understand this is an enemy this is a temporary friend this is a permanent friend this is a strategic partner this is not always a partner even not always a partner too never say never and never say not always so and and you understand here he is here he is the front he he is the rear all

and when here this one and that one like that and that one has his own interests, that one has his own group interests and so on and so forth and so on and so forth, if ukraine will not make mistakes, if the unity of the ukrainian nation will be as it is now, and maybe even half as much , it will be enough, but the overwhelming majority will have approximately the same point of view on the need to get into nato on the need to get to europe in the european union they bypass work on the need to limit themselves to the understanding that life will not be the same after until february 24 after 24 and about what will be difficulties, what will be shortages, what will be many, many, many, but there will be a lot of help, let's not quarrel with each other, let's not be lenient to each other's mistakes, let's not, during the pre-election campaign of the presidential and parliamentary parties, fight fiercely with

people in front of us -e on the mouth of our opponents and snot then it will be more or less then we will remain a very strong important regional and maybe not only regional state we just now at the address cleverly told us what can we need to put question and give russia the likes of un security, they won't give it because we don't have stupid weapons, there's only one condition, that's why keep in mind, it's all up to us , everything absolutely everything depends on the ukrainians, nothing depends on anyone, ok, from the ukrainians after the battle of konotop, girey offered vyhovsky to immediately go to moscow to decide everything, wondering what would happen now, if only we had agreed then, it is a useless thing, i agree in vain, and now it is easy to hear from the

russian, i estimated that you will win to liberate your land and help us overthrow the regime. do you think moscow moscow from amorskvala, the war of liberation could become at least as close to as unifying for ukrainians as the one that is going on now, i don't know, i spoke about it in passing, i don't know, i'm not convinced that if ukraine enters the territory of russia, there will be unanimous approval undoubtedly there are people in ukraine who will approve of this step , there will undoubtedly be many such people, but i am not, i am not convinced that the majority of more than half of such people will be found who will say dumb. we want to attack moscow now, enter moscow, fight in moscow or

near moscow, etc. no one wants the countries of the world. i think that's why it's difficult here, it's difficult, it's difficult, it's not ambiguous, but remembering the past, well, it's simple, i don't think it's right, because konotopska vyhovskyi, everything in the world is changing, that's why i don't know, i think ukrainians are not very aggressive i have the impression that the ukrainians are aggressive only when they get into their pockets, but then they can become very tough, and if they don't get into the ukrainians' pockets, let's go to moscow now and grab something, damn it, how peaceful we are, we've never grabbed anything for so long and that is why i have no experience, so what would happen if i were people

who believe that the krasnodar region is ukraine and it is geographically and ethnically true, but the question is that i also do not have the conviction that everyone in the krasnodar region will be delighted and take i don't think kherson people should meet the ukrainian army. sofia. how do you feel about women in the army? have you let your female relatives go to war? do you think it should be done? it is mandatory , if not for everyone without exception, to have at least an annual military meeting in a small israel has made a bet on this, they are good at countering their aggressive neighbors, yes sofia, because i was talking about this yesterday, and with the representative of the state of israel, he told me a very interesting thing , he says, listen, you are so territorial the defense is strong, so there is no need to borrow from someone.

maybe they have already grown up. so you hinted at the fact that someone will borrow from you and not you from someone, so there are a lot of ukrainians now rich . organizations and so on. therefore, after the war, it is necessary to definitely think about it. i do not treat women in the army badly. i think that it is, but it should be voluntary. i think that it is not like in israel, it is like this. israel is a very small country according to the number of people who live there, what kind of experts are there and do you trust bloggers? no, i don't. i trust one in mykolaiv veresu. there is one expert, maybe he 's even an analyst. he's definitely not a blogger, that's why i ca

n't name my three favorites. and this is a mistake maybe and maybe no, but honestly i'm reading well, somehow i have such a mess in my head, i can't tell you what, but i open my eyes in the morning and start reading no there aren't those the british prime minister promised to challenge putin's regime at the end of the g20 however such promises time remains declarative, which actions of britain really prove that it is a challenge to the regime to catch all the words starting from johnson, all actions starting from johnson, all actions starting from this newest darmeier of britain and all not only actions but words as it is here prove a challenge to the putin regime, all absolutely a do you want to say some actions have such

that he will come out and tell you, i will now go to the moscow cinema, a nuclear bomb, no money, ukraine will also receive weapons from britain, it will also receive weapons, it will train ukrainian soldiers, it will push the rest of the country for help to ukraine, too, he consults with the closest, best, richest friend of ours, the united states , he analyzes the situation on the front, intelligence , tells all this is happening, and i can only say that i am terribly happy about this. and now september is ending, and anna eva is starting. with news editors, in particular, about ukrainian pra