to be pragmatic, again, the problem with china is that it tries first, it offers, for example, cheap loans, this is an example of sri lanka, and then this economic dependence turns into political dependence, and this must be avoided, that is, our economic relations with china must be very pragmatic and we we must understand the risks and dangers that the expansion of trade with this country entails. that is, we must take this into account and strengthen trade and economic relations with democratic countries with a democratic world oleksandr well, yesterday president zelenskyy in his video message stated that at the g20 summit - ukraine will give answers to all the questions that are currently being heard next week's quote well, it will be tuesday, on wednesday, the gtventy group itself will be held and our position will be presented we will give answers to many questions that are currently being asked publicly

, so that all our people, all our partners , everyone who supports us can hear them. ready, what answers can we give to them, i ask, even what president zelenskyi says, i think that some countries of the g20 are not our friends, but they will try to push ukraine in the direction of, as they call it, a political and diplomatic solution to the conflict, that is, such attempts will be made, i am sure that the president will resolutely rebuff such attempts, he will explain what the danger is and why. and it is very important to understand that this war is not just a war of russia against ukraine, it is a war of russia against everything of the civilized world and every country in the world must realize that this is its war as well and participate on the side of the enemy and the violator of international

law. thank you, mr. oleksandr, for the inclusion . the international agenda somehow continues to focus on ukraine, and this is absolutely fine in my opinion. well, a little bit about the situation in the de- occupied kherson oblast, our law enforcement agencies will have a lot of work to do now, given the identifying their collaborators first you need to identify them and you know it is especially important to find educators who voluntarily went to cooperate with the russian aggressor because, well, this influence on bridges of children is well, as a separate separate type of criminal activity, unfortunately, the authorities are already known almost all the surnames of traitorous teachers and they will answer to the law, the

minister of education serhiy skarlet said about this, the number of teachers who agreed to collaborative actions and cooperated with the occupiers is extremely low, we cooperate with law enforcement agencies surnames known to almost everyone, they will be absolutely fully responsible before the law for their collaborationist actions. this is a matter for law enforcement agencies. i hope that everyone will be involved, and the minister noted that labor relations with such educators are naturally broken in the meantime . konstantin kostyantyn ryzhenko from kherson raises a very important question with who addressed him, his subscribers actually write about the fact that some of the people were forced to work, uh, in fact, for the occupiers, well, de facto, for the occupiers, even brothers russian passports are under coercion or because of the fear of simply being left without work without food,

the humanitarian situation, especially on the right bank , was simply catastrophic, and in recent weeks people have been asking the question, in what situation do we consider it collaborators in which we are not considered collaborators is there a concept of household collaborationism, and if we pay attention to one of the speeches of iryna vereshchuk, a professional minister, in a telethon just a few weeks ago, she remarked that people should not go to the referendum they should vote no they have to take passports because they will have to answer according to the law to the state of ukraine well, in fact, the law says that the relevant positions, let's say, fall under this, and ordinary people who tried to simply survive in the conditions of occupation, well, the law does not say anything about it, nevertheless, people are afraid, they are afraid of it the condemnation that can be directed at them simply because they appeared this piece of paper with a two-headed chicken

and it really was a pass to life, a normal everyday life. i think that we need clarification now on this matter as well people are looking for answers to questions, my video from the points, maria zakharova, spokeswoman for the russian ministry of foreign affairs, which one did you mention, which betrayal did you publish confirmation that lavrov is alive and he did not get poisoned on the way, what did i hint at, that he might have eaten something, he is sitting, let's see the video let's see, he just sits in shorts and in the womb and comments, and in the sound he says something interesting. and it's enough that he 's moving, so he's still alive . journalists who write that all lavrov is hospitalized, we get a huge amount, by the way, we talk about the amount of messages from russian citizens that happened so that we remember the journalist lived, well

, it is still more honorable for a western journalist to write the truth than they are to write the truth, and i do not limit my reports to only one point of view which does not broadcast on all issues, i will one way or another take advantage of which is ignored, let's finish with this, please. well, it is alive and moving, as they say. what will be the most interesting thing he will say based on the results of the big 20 and the implementation of this is exactly where everyone will shun him and actually boycott him, so it will be really interesting to listen to what he is going to do the day after tomorrow and continue to talk about. well, okay, because he will do it seriously. well, come on, right he swam a little on the plane, then got a leak and now he is ready for battle again, well, that is, he explained his poisoning, i understand why he was sick, now he is alive and healthy again after a possible hospital stay and we know, but it is interesting that western journalists. that is, you and i are western

journalists. well, we were referring to the situation of journalists. in fact, russians are being taken out of the attack. russian mistakes were the first to report such a possibility of lavrov being hospitalized. well, god be with him, as they say, more precisely, yesterday with him, without major summits. the twenties start tomorrow , an extremely important story, everyone is waiting for the speech of our president, and the president promised that he will answer a large number of questions that they will uh, these will be answers for ukrainians and for our partners, including we actually have a story prepared by our colleagues about what the g20 is, how it is built, why this organization and this meeting are important and on what basis it functions. let's look at the g20 or g20 - this is a club of countries with the most powerful and dynamic economies in the world in addition to the g7 countries, it

includes china, argentina, brazil, india, indonesia, south korea, turkey, and the republic of south africa , together they cover 85% of world gdp. the 20th was created in the late 90s in response to the asian financial crisis, which significantly undermined the world economy, therefore, as a rule, the g20 primarily discusses economic problems. but not only, for example, at recent meetings, world leaders talked about the coronavirus pandemic, the health care system and migration as one of the central topics of this year's summit, which will be held on 15-16 russian aggression against ukraine and its negative economic consequences for the whole world will occur in indonesia in november, the worsening of the food crisis, the increase in the price of energy sources and accelerated inflation in the summer, the president of indonesia, joko widodo, invited volodymyr zelenskyi to come to the summit, hoping that he would be able to sit him down at the negotiating table with putin, but it quickly became clear

that such a meeting was impossible. the ukrainian leader is likely to participate in the summit in an online format . at the g20 summit next week, the ukrainian position is formed. as always, our position will correspond to the interests of global security. we will not go to the island of bali and vladimir putin, the russian president, blackmailed the world with hunger until the end, threatening to disrupt the grain agreement and hoped that they would sit down at the negotiating table with him, and russia would definitely be represented there at a high level . at lavrov's ball, in this way he avoided a demonstrative boycott by western leaders, in particular the president of the united states, joe biden, who called the russian president a war criminal, according to the american media, not

wanted to cross paths with putin even on the sidelines of the summit and at a joint photo session, we continue our broadcast, well, it is interesting for me personally. the information that 85% of the world's gdp is created by only 20 countries, which today are going to indonesia to the island of bali and tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, they will solve the world's problems in including the problem of what to do with russia and its leaders. that's right, we have information. khrystyna wants to share that the ukrainian president has already come to the ukrainian report. if we have a photo of this visit, then let's watch, they report on this and our questions, the partners came to kherson, of course, where kherson is occupied, and it's actually a very good story. i think that, again, for the world, this is a signal that we are liberating our own and there is

no fear of entering our de-occupied land that do you know who went to the crimea, this whole story takes place in the crimea on the crimean peninsula, i will remind you in the meantime, uh, there are also interesting metamorphoses. and now i would like to uh, now i would like to read to you, if i may say so, the essence of what is happening in people's conditions in the crimea, eh. and if you want to understand what is happening there, then go to the bazaar, because in the bazaar , in fact, there are very eh interesting thoughts, which , unfortunately, are not there because of the enemy propaganda in the minds of our eh citizens. and they actually believe in what friendship trains with the people of bandera will soon go to crimea, and they still believe that putin everything is going according to plan, and that something incomprehensible is happening , absolutely everyone thinks so, they ask each other if

you still have ukrainian passports or have they not been recalled actions in general are also worried that a concentration camp is being created in the crimea to which they take all those who are disagreeable, so to speak. well, they will not pay any pension under ukraine, because they will consider bozhechko to be collaborators, well, it’s scary, in fact, our citizens, our ukrainian citizens, remain in crimea, if they did not commit collaborative actions, then actually there is nothing to worry about , you have nothing to live for in the occupation - this is an absolutely normal task and it should be done with us in communication andriy osadchuk people's deputy of ukraine mr. andrii, we congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to the heroes good morning and also in communication from the studio there is already i hope oleg dunda people's deputy of ukraine olezhe oh congratulations i see i have a good day i would like to see you khrystyna and you igor of course too well, i am andriy

congratulations for not the first time in the last day, dear, when i wanted to start with such a delicate topic with you , we only asked yesterday in the head of the press center of the operational command south. how did it happen that the ukrainian journalists did not even get to kherson, did not receive permission to enter the occupied kherson, and they were already entering the senn from there. how did it become known today that they were deprived accreditation of representatives of western snakes and anenskaya nyuses, there are a few more. well, they don’t name names at all, they don’t name who exactly, but it’s obvious that it’s these ones, since their direct inclusions were the first world messages with live video broadcasts from occupied kherson. how do you, mr. andriy, treat this from one side we were outraged yesterday why the ukrainian mass media didn't let us in, but they did, but today, well, i 'm sorry already today, because they were the first to send a live broadcast from pre- occupied kherson to the whole world, showing the emotions that were there

are overflowing with ukrainian citizens well, maybe not a completely fair decision, what do you think? as a people's elected representative, i ask, well, look at the western world. it is very competitive, and in order to be famous and popular, you need to present some unique product, so when you say ukrainian channels, ukrainian correspondents were not allowed. well, they were not allowed because there were absolutely clear reasons for this, first of all security, because if the military accredits journalists, they are to one degree or another responsible for their safety and hello, but the western media, some of them in pursuit of a bright story are ready to risk, this is the style of work of all the leading channels of all the tabloids, and they pay a very high price for it in the literal sense of the word, or i think you know it better than me, those stories when journalists die in the war and there have been a lot of such cases in recent decades, but this is

part of their profession and they are ready for such a risk, of course you and i are extremely pleased and it is important that they provided the broadcast online , in fact on skyrius, by force. yes, it is very important but if, god forbid, one of them was injured or someone died, then the question is who will be responsible for this, and the responsibility for this, according to ukrainian laws, ukrainian rights , e-e, was not made by the military, our administration brought the military, and clearly they have no desire to be responsible for someone it's creative, therefore, despite all the admiration for the quality of work of western journalists, i think we all protect democracy with you, and democracy is rules and procedures if there are certain rules established by the ministry of defense of ukraine and the general staff, which is primarily related to the guarantee of safety, guarantees of life and health of

journalists, then they should be followed. and those who do not follow them, they create problems for the military, so this is from the point of view, it is worth considering a comment from the operational command south , in accordance with the order of the 73rd commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, it is determined that in the combat zone , the order of work of journalists is determined by the commander of the relevant unit in whose area of ​​responsibility is the settlement where they want to go to get journalists, and it is he who gives permission for such work only accompanied by a press officer in the appropriate order and with the presence of an accreditation card and submission of their own application, it has always been the case that some journalists got there. but it is the same as people who cross the street at a red light, everyone they know that you can't do this, it's officially forbidden, but they still go and even often nothing happens to them for it , here it works roughly the same as it was with the help of some military who took it upon themselves responsibility if so, we will conduct an official investigation, conclusions will be made , work will be carried out at the level of disciplinary

action, some other military personnel will be guilty of the fact that this happened, i am not very happy with it, to be honest but it is beautiful wait khrystyna wait and if someone killed journalists who would be responsible for this answers yes because journalists are chasing sensations, although i say this jackpot once again, the footage we saw will go down in history and not only in the ukrainian state about the dead journalists taras protsyuk he died in baghdad having all the credentials in the hotel while standing on the balcony and filming it . understand all the dangers you understand, that is, it just seems to me that i am a stickler for the rules, i stick to the rules, if there are rules, they must be followed, if everyone

ignores the rules, it is guided by professional needs, personal needs, we we will live in chaos, that's why i think you are being introduced with you olezhe, first of all, whether they will be deprived of the accreditation of the 1+1 tv channel, i wonder if the public and community journalists whose journalists you are, it turns out, also made their way into the territory of the kherson region, this is the first question, and the second question, uh, again , i remember the direct inclusion of the bbc just during the first seconds of the missile attack in lviv, the ukrainian mass media did not have it. don’t you dare say, don’t you dare show anything, you are interfering with the military, you are pointing missiles there, they are standing there greetings, well, this is not the norm, and why aren’t the rules equal for everyone, mr. oleg, the bloc , competition, conditions for everyone, max levin died

doing his job in ukraine, those cool people here, we give them the opportunity, but our incredible military correspondents don’t have it. now it’s coming out access to kherson once again. well, my point of view is a little different from andrii's, and opportunities do not give opportunities, they take away . i will have orcs here in the spring around kyiv. i have seen a lot of how foreign correspondents work . often with their tenacity and willingness to climb into such holes without having any accreditations well, when even the military were not ready to climb into such holes and this is their job, it is someone's adrenaline rush e-e some e-e mission of life can be called in different ways to forbid any journalist to go somewhere it is almost impossible to go there after taking away the accreditation without taking away the ride very often journalists act at their own discretion and at their own risk and

it is impossible to control in any way only the only option is to forbid them to ride in general ukraine, well, you do. you understand that it is completely unrealistic regarding work, laid off for 2 days, each journalist decides for himself where he and i plan to take risks , in what way, where does he plan to go, if there is such a desire? well, i see how the french work there. if there is a desire, well, they they find any loophole to get in there regarding the fact that the walls were removed and others who were deprived of credit from my point of view, they need to be given an award for this, i have a different opinion on the takeover, that's how the song goes, because you correctly noted here, here is a picture of this celebration and reception of our soldiers, er, to our ukrainians in kherson, this is the information company that we should use to promote ukraine, they did the work that we should have done a long time ago, why are they er, i apologize for

depriving them of accreditation, award them for this, all the pictures have flown once again this and this story has flown all over the world and it showed that the people of kherson are primarily ukrainians that they meet ukrainian soldiers and this is qualitatively important to do i am a journalistic jackpot and surely deprivation of accreditation may even be too much in this situation, my position is that deprivation i generally believe that these journalists are most likely to receive such a journalistic award abroad and they i you i you absolutely you need to learn this i support you comprehensiveness that needs to be treated p olezhe i i i personally believe that it is my opinion that they could have issued a warning, announced, invited to a conversation with a representative of the ministry of defense of the operational command, but deprived people of accreditation. i think this is too harsh. skara let's go together on this, it was necessary to

do it in a different way, it was necessary to take them to the telethon and do a small interview so that they told about what they saw, that is , interview them and this interview would fly this world and it was more useful countries than any requirements, we will not stop them by taking away the accreditation. they will still find a way to get there, well, we will only make it worse for ourselves, that's all. i think that i will not open america to anyone if i say that journalists in russian-ukrainian the more than eight-year-old war very often became the most desirable targets for the occupier, and a ukrainian journalist or any foreign journalist who finds himself in a war zone where certain stabilization and security measures have not yet taken place can just as well become a target and can just as well call on themselves and on the people who are nearby, in fact, enemy fire, why do we not

exclude this? their freedom ends where the freedom of the population and our military, who are the masters here and who establish here rules it seems to me that we can't force people to live completely refueling especially journalists who live on adrenaline and this is their profession, they understand why they help well, if you in this case, you know the old saying , if you can't prohibit you, then you need to lead this process, that is, in our case, we must understand that we cannot prohibit and travel to journalists where they consider it necessary, they will still ask according to our point of view, it is necessary, we cannot prohibit it, we need it to use for the benefit of ukraine and to think from this side and not to say that here are the limits, you can’t , you won’t go anyway, they’ll go anyway, bypass ukrainian journalists from the 27th, you can apply for a

trip to the de-occupied territories, respectively and our journalists should behave in the same way. how do foreign journalists behave? look for loopholes, drive, this is our profession, and they should use it. here, let them be the fourth power. well, if a journalist acts in accordance with the prohibitions of the authorities, well, then he he is not a journalist, he will be limited for everything, you always have information, now it is a state of war, we are guided exclusively by the recommendations and those rules established by the military. well, we have interesting questions about the authorities, you can ask the source of information, then they will lose their professional there to communicate professionally until what we are about connects precisely to the military operations to the release of the release to the occupation of kherson and to further plans well, she was yesterday, but i really like her, i wanted us to discuss her about the fact that the general

the american ben honges, the former commander of the ground forces in europe, said that ukraine can liberate mariupol and melitopol by january and after which the liberation of crimea will begin, he wrote, soon they will fire heimer from kherson from the approach to crimea within range - this is to weaken the russian defense at that time how the left wing of the counter offensive will take mariupol and kherson, and what about melitopol. by january, then the decisive phase of the company and the company for the liberation of the crimea will begin. andriy well, plus, he painted three different circles, the first circle - these are the hammers that we have , those missiles, and the last two circles, which cover the whole of crimea and even part of the taman peninsula, obviously hinting at the fact that some other, more distant combat weapon can be provided to us by andrei, your comment on similar statements and similar drawings, i liked the drawing even more than the application, yes, the drawing is good and the application is interesting, but look at a lot of events, such a whirlwind, we

often forget what was there a few months ago, but ukraine actually seized the initiative first, from the end of april, let's say, from the moment of the defeat of the russians near kiev in the kyiv region , we are constantly squeezing them out, squeezing out, squeezing them out , that's why this protest is ongoing, according to ukraine, since then they seized the initiative in this war, so they completely seized it from probably the end of july, when we have let the mercs appear and they didn't just appear, we showed the whole world that we can use them with impeccable quality. and when everyone realized that the ukrainian general staff is pursuing a very wise strategy of squeezing the occupier through the destruction of its logistical routes, this everything worked perfectly in the opera for the liberation of kherson, and i think it will work in the same way for the

liberation in the further south of ukraine, because this picture, of course, very clearly shows what all military experts and the military know, so that we can now have fire control over logistics from the crimea, which will significantly weaken or actually make it impossible to support the russian group in the south, and all this leads to the fact that ukraine, together with its allies, is thrown around the neck of moscow's troops in ukraine, he is procrastinating, he is procrastinating at will, of course, i would like to be faster , but here, of course, you have to behave in a very balanced way, and i have the impression that he is diligent, and our generals understand this very well and do it very well, so i share the optimism of western experts that the prosthesis of the release of the ukrainian rooster will continue in the future and that

now the defeat of the russians in kherson is not the freezing of the border along the dnieper no we will move on and i actually have no doubts about this thank you oleg your opinion and your attitude to such statements, can melitopol and mariupol really be deoccupied in january? well, i have hope that they will be occupied, and i certainly believe that. i am sure that we will return to the border of our 91st year and celebrate in sevastopol and in kerch , will it be our victory? by january, i wouldn't be so sure about the benhozhus, i still advised to treat this picture as a good , but still, picture, because i will remind the benhozhus, including until february 24, he also spoke publicly and not publicly about the fact that ukraine can fall into such and such a state in 3-4 days, that is, he gave such an opinion , now he is already officially and publicly speaking about

the fact that he was wrong and underestimated the ukrainian mission of the ukrainian people, of course, like everyone else, and therefore after all, i would treat him as more like a person who fixes trends, who sees the possible development of an event, but still did not get drawn to specific dates, especially since there is such a big difference between the soviet military school and the western what is the difference it is great, because when the western school of military science plans some actions, it is not tied to a specific date. first of all, there is a task in the e-e for the purpose of helping e-e, the purpose of the assignment is that the task must be completed in such a way as not to waste a lot of resources and there should not be many casualties from their own among their soldiers, that is why they are not bound to add, and the soviets, on the contrary, the main thing for them is to complete the task by a specific date, and accordingly, for this purpose, they can put in

a large number of combat personnel. that is, we and we now we are still moving on to western military science and there is no reference to a specific date, but the task will definitely be completed. the rotation with khrystyna will be completed and i will continue after the operation . yes, but now news time on the espresso tv channel means that we will see anzhelika sezonenko, colleague, we pass the word, thank you, colleagues. volodymyr zelenskyi in the liberated kherson, but the snowman is still prohibited from entering these and other news in a few moments