will you in particular call on your relatives from kherson to evacuate to the free ukrainian territory and with your observations, how ready is ukraine to accept them now such a mass of people. i think that kherson will be accepted now . only the country and the whole world knows and has heard about us, that's why i think that if they say that you need to evacuate, then it's better to leave if there is such a possibility, because the threat is really great that the city will be shelled, so it's better to think about your life all the more so when it will be a green corridor, a safe exit and not as before, ms. svitlana, do you perhaps have information on whether all the enemy forces have either fled to the left bank or surrendered because , just a couple of minutes ago, taras berezovets

said that there are several large russian gangs operating there? i know that there are still a lot of them in the city, they are all disguised in ordinary clothes of the city, they check all the documents, they interrogate everyone , i think they will all be found, mrs. svitlana. please tell me according to your observations, is there a problem, uh in the fact that people who lived during the occupation in the kherson region may not understand in what situation and who are considered collaborators. and in what situation, just a person who tried to live in the occupation, we understand that a large part of people have, for example, russian passports, now they were forcibly obtained by someone even i was forced to go and vote in the referendum, at the same time i did not hold any positions under the occupiers. i just see that there is anxiety on the part of the kherson people on this

account, they even ask where should we turn how so they say that we just don't have these extra questions, yes. such a problem exists because really a lot of people took these passports against their will, absolutely, a lot of people because of threats and so on. some kind of work just to feed my family, if not more or less kherson people understand everything, they understand what is coming, they are waiting for these checks and so on. well, i think everything will go well because they are collaborators in all the kherson bases, we have our own groups in telegrams where people they hand in these collaborators themselves, there is complete information about them from photos, e-e, facebook , instagram and phone numbers, so i think everything

will be fine. in this regard, svitlana, well, accordingly, we would like to ask you about other aspects of the situation, the crimes of russian interventionists, we already have a plus- minus an adequate picture reproduced, of course, in relation to russian actions in the kharkiv region, the kyiv region, and so on, according to the list, what was the difference between the enemy in kherson, well, they didn’t do anything, they selected people whatever they wanted they put people in the basement, just whoever they wanted , whether it was a girl, whether it was a woman, 70 years old, there was absolutely no difference, physically, there was violence against everyone, both boys and girls. i'm just telling you 100%, what they could just take away someone, a car, come home, pick up a house. that's how the looters took everything from the store, from the stores to the hospital. they took away everything that

was possible, monuments, even the children's... the last question of ms. svitlana is a threat. today , the us agency - this press is along with many other photos that illustrate the happiness of the kherson people from the fact that the defense forces finally liberated the city. they tied them to the post hand in hand, obviously waiting, i don't know, maybe it was the law enforcement officers in these photos, no violent acts in russia were recorded. to illustrate the liberated kherson, as far as

possible do you know about the subject of these photos and how widespread such a phenomenon is, how normal it is in your opinion well, i think that for looters and collaborators it is not the most terrible, how to say the punishment is not the most terrible that they were simply tied to a post to wait for our military or policemen to deal with them for now, today, yesterday, the day before yesterday, i have not heard of such a situation, maybe it is some kind of fake photos , because back in the early days, when our trade the centers, the people of kherson really stopped the marauders . thank you svitlana for your work. we hope that so far only the collection of humanitarian aid for the kherson region of kherson region will join. warmly ukrainians

, let us show you how we waited for our watermelons. thank you svitlana bugayenko , a volunteer from kherson was in touch with us. well, we will take a step further and talk about very sensitively, in particular, for m-m media with the situation that happened the other day. the fact is that some of the foreign journalists did a brilliant job in the kherson region in the liberated territories. these inclusions, these reports flew around the world, but they were made despite the fact that the military had instructed them not to go anywhere. it is necessary or safe. stabilization measures must take place. somehow, for some reason, foreign journalists from cnn and sky news were leaked at least that way, and some ukrainian journalists also ended up in kherson immediately after its deoccupation . today, a certain number of journalists

got there, unfortunately, not all who wanted but nevertheless , the first one who broke through was already deprived of accreditation, contact us svitlana ostapa , head of the supervisory board of the public p svitlana, we congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to the heroes e- the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine revoked the accreditation of a number of media representatives who violated the rules of work in the area of ​​the introduction of hostilities by carrying out information activities in the city of kherson before the completion of stabilization measures. cnn er sky news er six journalists are set by the media detector and it seems the public journalists are the same. this is the information i have. maybe you will update it. well, how do you view such a sanction for journalists , please ? it's a very tough sanction

, because in this regard, a statement was issued an hour ago from the media movement, which was joined by dozens of journalists. you said that how many journalists, how many of us media , got to kherson on the day of the release? well, actually there were much more of them and the fact is that we have accredited about 10,000 journalists from various ukrainian and foreign media and this is already a permit for them to work in the combat zone actions and so on in the occupied territories and so on, just this document, accreditation - it is already a permit to work with us in fact. it turns out that there are a lot of different layers between the ministry of defense and the lowest echelons of the ministry of defense they require a bunch of documents,

a bunch of different pieces of paper, approvals, and so on from of journalists and here the journalists expressed their disagreement with such a decision regarding the deprivation of accreditation because the media filmed these unique shots of the liberation of kherson on the very day of the liberation of kherson, somewhere when our military entered there, these emotions cannot be re-edited later to show the world how it all was, and uh, you understand that journalistic materials are much more trusted by uh, viewers, listeners, just people than dry appeals, definitely no one, a very important point. that the russians actually won't be able to to use their argument, and that's all, conditionally speaking, they took the people of bandera from lviv to

kherson, then arranged these showy eyes, allegedly meeting with the flags, no, all this was really on hot tracks in terms of journalistic work - it's just a treasure, it's a jackpot, if you can say so it is really so from the other side. i would like to present to you the answer of the south operational command, which was given in accordance with the order number 73 of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, it is determined that the order is in the combat zone the work of journalists is determined by the commander of the relevant unit. in whose area of ​​responsibility is the settlement where the journalists want to go, it is not enough to simply have certificates and accreditations. obviously, when you are in martial law and when the military eh, let's say that's how they decide the final result, it's a matter of because how was it with the assistance of the military who took responsibility. if so, then we are conducting an official investigation and

conclusions will be drawn, work has been carried out at the level of disciplinary recovery, this is a comment from the operational command of the south. i understand the position of journalists from the other side, and our military now, well, if it ends up in such a situation where they said and their word should be heard, but it was ignored, you understand, the journalists went in with the military, that's what the journalists are all about came in with the military and what is said there why couldn't they come in that it was supposedly for their own security, so i will say that there are uh-he lived in kherson on the day of liberation well, according to my data, somewhere around 80,000 people. they are also in danger, and journalists have to do their work and here in this situation. it seems to me that their work in journalism is simply underestimated, because a journalist is also our war, it will also be our victory, and we want to do our best, and all my colleagues want contribute to

this victory, you understand, and that is why this is the appeal of journalists, for example, even today in kherson they did not let us in, and they did not find a place for us. well, these journalists who came in, they sat in the trenches together with the military, did not expect to be released either the liberation of kherson, like everyone else, and this appeal is addressed to the president of ukraine and the commander of the army, the commander of the armed forces, and the minister of defense, we ask that, first of all, we somehow return the accreditation , and secondly, to review it again and uh, discuss uh, these communication things, all because well, this can't be what's happening now, this is the story, you know, this is the biggest, well, the biggest story of the 100th anniversary, and of course journalists want to record it, they record it, then the crimes pass it on transfer it to e-e bodies which

they will deal with it in the international court and all that and uh, well, you can't underestimate it. remember how dmytro komarov drove into bucha, the first day we were together at school, and again, and i shot this street, i uh, yablonskogo uh, and uh- there are dozens of corpses on this street, how is it all? then the whole world was shaken. well, you can't underestimate the work of journalists. we are terribly grateful to the armed forces of ukraine. we respect and love them. er, such a thing happened. imagine. well, yes the spaces are being organized, but the spaces are being organized already after a few days after the first military has already entered kherson , and secondly, journalists are also using this e-e mechanism and are trying to get into the prestur, today 200 journalists passed on a bus with 30 seats, they cannot to fit in one

bus, so it is also a parallel job, but you have to think about how to give the journalist the opportunity to update his work, they have gone through dozens of trainings, they understand what safety and danger are, they are also responsible for their own safety you don't need to think about them, i would like to note to mrs. svitlana that my husband and his team are working on the evacuation of people from bakhmut and uh, before they worked in the severodonetsk lysichan direction and many times the stories were uh, just as negative as possible and the intervention of journalists in the work of evacuation crews, the new york times and other media also sinned, and in fact it remained the case that people who previously agreed to the evacuation and were persuaded for weeks simply refused to do so because journalists chased sensationalism and broke

wood. and this is the same phenomenon and we cannot avoid talking about it. on the one hand, i perfectly understand the role of journalists and i support it . follow the rules don't do any harm sometimes it doesn't work out for us so far and we learn a little bit in the process i think it's unfair what happens to foreign journalists and ukrainians as well because when we are asked not to show the consequences of overflights and we all we sit like mice, we try not to ask our spokesmen for extra words from our military, the bbc. let's say that at the beginning of the large-scale invasion, they allowed themselves to film a flight in lviv , and i don't quite understand why. well, these are individual cases, we all analyze them somehow and of course condemn such actions, but it must be said that

anton gerashchenko is the first to show such things to the last, and this is a person who is involved in the government, so these are separate things, and the liberation of kherson is a terribly big page, you know, positive the page is all about this war and it had to be recorded and a lot of journalists from various commercial and non-commercial media are outraged that they were not even given the opportunity to work out this moment and now they are also condemning those who were able to get to kherson together with the military well, i would like to say that journalists work and in the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine there are those who take cameras in their hands and these are actually people in the ranks of the armed forces, that is, they can perform this work if there are we with the permission of civilian journalists i thank you very much for this conversation, father, from the bottom of my heart

. thank you svitlana ostapa, the head of the supervisory board of the public, was with us in connection with the revocation of the accreditation of some ukrainian foreign journalists due to the fact that despite the order of the military, they still ended up in kherson on the day of liberation, but one must give credit to their colossal work, which really impresses and opens the eyes of the world to the situation in ukraine and to what is happening in kherson, how exactly the people of kherson relate to the russian federation, of course to of our native country. we are moving forward to achieve the goals of the so -called piazzetta operation. the russian federation can also be at the negotiating table, but now they are impossible due to the position of the ukrainian side . dmytro piskov made such a statement the other day. hints about the desirability of negotiations with ukraine are increasingly coming from our partners, but so far ukraine gave no reason to doubt the steadfastness of its position, no

negotiations with the terrorist putin, we will remind you about this in our story, no negotiations with putin, the nsdc of ukraine made this decision after an illegal annexation of four oblasts on october 4. however, after the visit to kyiv of the adviser to the president of the united states, jacko bas, volodymyr zelenskyi's flamboyant rhetoric softened somewhat, according to the publication according to your post, sullivan asked the ukrainian president not to publicly reject the idea of ​​negotiations in order to convince concerned european allies that war is not it will take years to talk about it with him, but i did not close the door. i said that we will be ready to talk with russia, but already with another russia that is really ready ready for peace ready to admit that they are occupiers and ready to compensate our people this is not a question of money everything must be returned another respected publication the new york times affirms views on

when ukraine should start negotiations with the aggressor in the american administration the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff of the united states general -mark milli believes that kyiv should sit down at the negotiating table with moscow in the near future, he begged ukraine has already reached its maximum in military terms and the result needs to be fixed other the point of view of president biden and his adviser sullivan, they believe that it is too early to start negotiations. president biden said that ukraine decides when and how they want to negotiate . nothing about ukraine. we believe in a just peace that is based on the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity not invented by us but enshrined in the un charter, a similar position is at least publicly expressed by european countries, chancellor schultz recently announced that the war should now be ended it is impossible through diplomatic means and

putin is to blame for this, president macron emphasized that negotiations should begin when ukraine wants it and on its terms, it is likely to be very annoying if not frightening to the kremlin, which, against the background of defeats on the front, is trying to impose on ukraine and the west, negotiations are still open to negotiations we have never refused them, we are ready to conduct them, you understand, taking into account the realities that are emerging at the moment, putin's decision not to go to the g20 summit in indonesia is an obvious signal that they do not want to talk to him in the west, instead, on the island of bali, negotiations regarding ukraine will still take place between president biden and the chinese leader, and in the white house they are sure that if anyone can influence putin so that he stops the war, it is beijing. well, indeed, a meeting with joseph biden is taking place today in the status of the heads of their states

, respectively, at 15:30 we are waiting for joseph biden's press conference based on the results of this meeting, contact us volodymyr yelchenko, diplomats , ex-representative of ukraine at the un in 2015-2019 e the former ambassador of ukraine to the usa mr. volodymyr i congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to the heroes i would like to outline the framework that our partners may set for us regarding the negotiations with the russian federation will not be as uncompromising as i understand a-such appeals could to hear from psalievan, who, er, spoke with ukrainian president volodymyr zelensky well , the sharp newspaper hints at the fact that the status of crimea may become a key stake on the table of these negotiations, er, is it really because public rhetoric is one story, and let's put it this way reality must be approached sometimes more pragmatically, of course you must approach it

more pragmatically, as for the framework, they were clearly outlined by president zelenskyi, and he repeatedly repeated it, there are four or five conditions that must be fulfilled by russia, everything must begin with the complete withdrawal of russian troops, this is clearly the number one condition, and even from a technical point of view, it could become the start of, if not negotiations directly, then at least some preparatory processes for such negotiations because let's say so, the rest of the conditions are already the issues that need to be discussed, the same compensations for the responsible guarantee of security, the restoration of the central integrity of ukraine, and so on, but without the withdrawal of russian troops, uh, well, there's nothing to say, if we want, well, let's imagine hypothetically that tomorrow we we are sitting at the table of translations from russia, what does this

mean that they will leave the positions where they stand today, but we are not even talking about the status quo on february 23 or 24, and that is already too. in march well, it was still possible to talk about such things in a hypocritical way, but today already with this. neither ukrainian societies . about the situation on the ground, that is, to leave everything as it is, of course, no one will go for it. well, the rest of the issue, as i said, is the subject of negotiations and sooner or later , it is clear that these negotiations will begin. if i am not mistaken, the un general assembly through in in any case,

the issue of operations for ukraine in connection with russian aggression will be discussed in the near future, mr. volodymyr, we will definitely talk about it later, once again, biden is meeting today that they are not satisfied with the option of even some ghostly prospect of using nuclear weapons on the continent, and this, in my opinion, is a deterrent factor for the russian federation. what do you think we should expect from these very important negotiations leaders of two very powerful states, first of all, i am sure that these negotiations will concern uh, purely one-sided issues related to misha and the chinese republic, this is clear. weapons, it was very timely and accurate. i think that this

was the very last nail that drove putin's confidence that he can, let 's say, do whatever he wants. we remember those aggressive the statements were only then repeated cage and laurels and other factors. i no longer say russian propaganda on television, but somehow it all quieted down, and just as it quieted down, it seems to me that the last meeting between putin and syntepin was, if i'm not mistaken, in a scooter. you already told me a couple of months ago after that weapons are tied, no one in moscow is talking about him another meeting that was not announced before and actually no one has commented on it yet, just now it is most likely happening in ankara in piskov, they asked if it is true that naryshkin is the director of the foreign intelligence service of the russian federation can right now meet with someone authorized by the american side

, e.e. piskov noted that he can neither confirm nor deny this information, in your opinion , vladimir, are there currently e.e. in some negotiations negotiations without us about us no, i do not i think that what we should do now is treason on this matter eh well, first of all, we still have to wait for some information, we can neither confirm nor deny whether such negotiations are taking place, if they are taking place, then again, as in the case of there are a lot of bilateral issues with china. well , including. by the way, it can be and another, as they say, chinese warnings about not using nuclear weapons of russia, and it is also possible that it will be used for that, well, at least by the american side to bring to russia, well, let's say so realistic is the reaction of the americans to what is happening first of all at the front, that is, military issues

, and certain warnings regarding cooperation with the rana can be predicted. i also do not rule it out. in their place, i understand, but there is some kind of suspension or restriction of the supply of weapons to ukraine, finally there will be told all kinds of terrible things about how these weapons are prolonging the conflict there, we regularly hear all this rhetoric from scribblers of international organizations, among other things, and separate russian politicians but it is clear that this did not create any influence on the positions of the americans, mr. volodymyr, finally, briefly. and is it important that if these negotiations are taking place, they are taking place precisely in turkey, in ankara, oh eight, you know maybe turkey as a nato member country is such a normal platform, such negotiations could have taken place there, land or helsinki, i think that the

place is not of fundamental importance, but i think that there was something there, or turkey, karat, it is just a quite comfortable place for both sides, it is a current moment. so, i think that they have always had such contacts, and i want to confirm this once again from my experience working in washington. ukraine is behind our backs, it’s so, so it doesn’t happen americans uh, uh, always uh, well, at least that’s how it was in my time. i’m sure that nothing has changed. they always warn and inform our side through diplomatic channels or some other channel about what issues will happen, be happy what is possible ukraine would like to be told by her a russian and such so that there will be no closure here and no institution of ukraine, nothing will happen,

i thank you for these comments, they are very important for us to understand everything that is happening now about ukraine, but for her yanchenko, a diplomat, ex-representative of ukraine at the un from 2015 to 2015 and former ambassador of ukraine to the united states of america, we now have a very short break. but arthrosis cannot get used to it, it does not allow to move. i tried everything. and at the pharmacy i bought yellow dolgit cream, it saves me from pain in rheumatism, relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves the mobility of the joints to bach and the back. in ukraine, the main topic for ukrainians is victories and

losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics , serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this, people who have information and shape public opinion, people who defend ukraine and create the future right now, the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict by serhiy rudenko, monday on thursdays at 5:10 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m. russian peace invades ukraine, destroys ukrainians, in order to survive, we must defeat the inhumans, all together, throughout the country mykolaiv teenagers from the public association junior dreams together with the espresso tv channel announced a fundraiser for the purchase of 200 silencers for weapons for ukrainian fighters, in turn, our polish friends