they just said that we can't go there. as you can see from the footage that is now being distributed on e-e social networks, volodymyr zelenskyy communicated with journalists like this, well, probably with those he needs, probably with those with whom he can find some kind of language and wants to they talked about what he wants them to talk about, in particular about the liberation of kherson and in particular about our relations with the west. so, i want to ask the editor to say if we have anyone in contact now, so that i am not in contact with him yet well, it's very bad because a lot of questions, a lot of time. let me remind you of what i asked you at the beginning of the program, to which i have already said, for several programs already, we have been asking you questions, now they are already telling me that there is someone on the line, but first i am about -th question, since i have already started, we asked you why putin does not go to himself, well, in fact, he

did not go to the g20 summit, he is afraid, 86% voted, too busy, 6% voted, and your option is eight percent, so out of 192 people who have already taken participation in this survey - 86% say they are afraid yes, putin, because his family, we know that. so , they told me that we have yaroslav voiko again on the phone. yaroslav, you are with us, yes, i am with you. oh, putin does not allow us to communicate normally. well, nothing, we will survive it. yaroslav, please tell me which ones you have. expectations from the big 20 on the indonesian island of bali are not very high expectations just like from the big 20 i have more expectations from today's meeting between the president of the united states of america joe biden and the president of the people's republic of china will take place today on the eve of the opening of this

summit, and this is actually the number one event of this week, as for the summit itself, there will probably be no comedians or a joint statement, no matter how hard the president of indonesia, joko widoda, tries to get the opposition of all 20 countries to agree, we know that this is the er twenty is primarily an economic organization that er deals with economic issues and it will now deal with overcoming the consequences of the covid-19 pandemic and the transition to new energy carriers in connection with the fact that in general russia and this aggression upset our world in general and led to huge costs and to huge inflation before er, in general, there will be a redistribution of energy carriers and after, however, at the summit of the twenty that we need to

rely more and reformat the digital economy, but these are all er, very good, good humanitarian goals and it will be hoped that they will be discussed exactly two days tomorrow, president zelenskyi also promised that he will speak at the u-20 summit, unlike putin, whom you already mentioned, he won't just come, he won't even address to the participants of this event, we simply recall the year 2014, when in fact it was the same putin. he ended up in isolation when they took a joint photo . a russian propagandist came up with this. well, you know, everyone goes to the canteen in a group, and

our emperor sits and separates from all the dinners. well , this is nonsense, of course, mr. putin would be expected to have exactly the same insularism - this is a pariah country - he is the president of paris, unfortunately he more well a legitimate president even before the 24th year well, but the world community will make sure that he, uh, his influence in the world decreases, and our armed forces of ukraine will be in pain on the field, they will do everything to stop him and the second army of the world in the end not today not tomorrow but after some time its existence ceased to pose a threat to the world out of 20 countries of the seven-twenty, they are exactly 10 countries and the european union as an individual member of the twenty-seven are civilized democratic countries, half of them are those countries that are not

can be attributed to a democratic civilized community, these are authoritarian regimes in china, first of all, i expect that, after all, for the first time since president biden became the president of the united states of america two years ago. another five years, if they can agree among themselves on the issue of ivan, i.e., not an attack on china, nato, ivan, if they agree on how to jointly resist russia's aggression against ukraine, although this will be a very difficult issue for china he does not want to directly condemn the russian federation, although he strongly condemns the rattling of nuclear weapons, this will be the biggest breakthrough of this summit. and in general

, we will hope that this will be the case with this meeting of twenty. what our guys will do on the battlefield later well, of course, in addition to what will be talked about, and that is exactly the g20. i thank you, mr. yaroslav, for participating in the program. thank you for your professional answers. this was olx yaroslav voitko diplomats international expert well, we are making our way in spite of everything that putin is trying to do to us here, we are calling, we are in contact with our experts and oleksandr krayev, foreign policy expert, foreign policy council expert, the ukrainian prizma is with us, mr. oleksandr, thank you for joining so i congratulate you, i congratulate you to see mr. oleksandr please tell me that it is obvious that i will talk with you about the results of the elections to the american congress. please tell me why the republicans are doing this despite some

very serious expectations, it was not possible to get a majority in the senate, uh, there are several options for how to answer this question, one of these options is currently being seen in the republican media and it sounds something like this. idiots , to be honest, it is very difficult to disagree with this thesis. because in fact, almost all the people whom trump nominated for these elections, almost all the people whom trump supported during these elections, they really are these elections they lost, they left the republican party without four governors, without several dozen congressmen and without several senators, that is, in fact, there is also a trail that trump leaves behind . how toxic he is for american politics, how toxic he is for the republican party is already becoming obvious, and the second

reason, which is rather external for the party, it means that after all, biden, the democrats, took the domestic issues of the americans very seriously. that is, we saw that biden actively tried his best every month to work on restoring the number of jobs, huge federal programs to support the economy were introduced, as we saw , foreign policy was advanced very actively, that is, in fact, the democrats did everything that depended on them, or really restore their own popularity and support. well, look at the battle for the house of representatives, how long can it last and whether that's because i think from what i'm reading that the republicans will still have a majority there, in fact, at the moment, the republicans still have a majority in the house of representatives but it is also necessary to note several features here, firstly, the majority will be in the region of 52-54%. it is not 65.70%, as they told the republicans that

a few months ago. in fact, these are much smaller numbers, therefore, on many issues, especially key, where the parties, where the parties themselves have certain differences, they will have to negotiate with the democrats, they will have to find some kind of compromise, they will have to find some common ground decisions, and of course the same applies to her democrats in many issues, that is, despite the fact that, after all, the republic of the lower tents of the congress takes everything, they will have to constantly work in very close cooperation with the democrats and the democrat in the senate, after all, their majority in the senate is not absolute, therefore, in the final, you and i have a very well-balanced, very balanced i the congress said alexander i am sure that you will now give a comprehensive answer to this question and explain. see yesterday, the minister of foreign affairs in france, catherine kolona, ​​said that europe needs to stand up a little more less dependent on the united states of america, because

now, for example, everyone in europe is looking at how the elections were held in the united states of america, and we need to somehow look less at it and be more independent in ukraine, but really, we were all waiting for the results of the elections before the american congress because we understood that people may come who will block or not block or at least reduce the flow of aid from the united states of america to ukraine, and that is why we really followed these elections, but look at the simple an average viewer in ukraine follows the elections in america and he knows that there are two chambers in the american congress, there is a house of representatives, there is a senate, there is a president, but he does not understand how this decision-making takes place, that is, who submits a decision and then blocks it. that is why it is important for us to know um, at least understand uh, what chamber is doing

during the passage of this decision, explain to us, we need to understand this for one simple reason, that no decision in the congress can be made without the consent of both chambers, that is, usually, the process the adoption of a document of any bill a document of appeal of anything it first goes through the specialized committees of the house of representatives of the lower house of congress and when the committees give their approval it is submitted to the vote of the lower house if it passes it it gets into the committees of the senate of the upper house if it passes them like committees they give the go-ahead , accordingly, it is put to the vote of the upper house of the congress only after that, if it goes through all these circles of bureaucracy, it is signed by the president of the united states, and why should we it is important to know that, for example, one house is left to the republicans, the other to the democrats, which will allow us to understand what the agenda will be in the american parliament. that is, it will be a completely republican policy. these were trumpian policies. this is completely separate from the republican

policy. where there will be a policy of democrats, it will be a policy of aggressive democrats, that is, one way or another. but these details are very important to us, which party, which combinations of its deputies owns which chamber in the congress. this essentially allows us to talk about that in in what direction will the political agenda of the united states move in the next few years, but now we can say, at least after what we already know at the moment, that this agenda will definitely be a pro-ukrainian agenda. reasons , first of all, the majority in both parties of the new congressmen who passed, for whom they voted, are moderate moderate democrats and moderate republicans, all the time a full-scale invasion and all the years until russia broke through its aggression against ukraine, it was the moderate parts of both parties that were our key sponsors, were

our key partners and friends, and in fact, the fact that they are now the majority of both parties simply indicates that the two-party support for ukraine that we burned is being preserved and whether otherwise, this duplicitous support has increased because these deputies have simply physically increased, firstly, and secondly, it is necessary to understand that such a congress will not interfere with the president of the united states implement his policy regarding ukraine, i.e. implement the english one when it is necessary to put forward his own proposals for new aid packages for extended aid and so on and so one way or another we have a more balanced, more strategic and for us more predictable system of work of the american branches of government. and if it is more predicted, this already says that it will be positive for ukraine, so it is predicted a pro-ukrainian position, mr. oleksandr, i was not going to ask you about it because well, it just flew out

but you mentioned to me about the lend-lease, and it has already started to operate, it has already started to operate on paper, the lend-lease. and we already have some supplies of the lizu field, that is, is it practically already in effect? in our imagination - this is still what it was in the second world war, this is a caravan and a ship that moves across the atlantic and saves the allied states in the great war against the dictator of the aggressor, in fact, in our case, andriy is a safety mechanism for the entire 22nd year. well, until this moment, e- all deliveries to us armaments. all work with the ukrainian armed forces was financed by the great aid package for ukraine, which was allocated by the us congress. at the beginning of march, the package was 40 billion dollars, and the congress simply added small amounts to it as needed. the packages themselves

without the involvement of the congress, that is, you and i figured out how to pass the decision in the congress, if there was no over the forest, then starting next year, every new package, no matter how small, would have to go through all these bureaucratic koalas of hell. and now that we have a deer forest, biden can actually take it as an executive order, that is, as long as we have the support of congress, as long as congress itself is ready to allocate funds for us, in essence, a landlist. is a safety mechanism. if suddenly congress stops supporting ukraine and does not want to allocate additional aid packages to ukraine, then president biden will simply be able to bypass his ban and continue this support for ukraine. thank you very much, mr. oleksandr for this answer, because you really answered a lot of ukrainians who can also ask this question. and where is this lend-forest, do we have it or do we not have it, does it work or does it not work? i thank you very much, but we will return anyway

before the elections, because i want to talk to you about them and this year, candidates were running. as you already said, a lot of republicans are trump protégés. well, quite a lot of that happened with those trump protégés. trump, taking into account the fact that his protégés are running or at least running for office, he began to actively prepare for the elections, yes, he really began to prepare for the elections, but those by-elections essentially buried his ambitions for the 24th year, because we see that not only the key sponsors of the republican party were also opposed to him by the establishment, that is, the leaders of the other two factions in the republican party, reagan conservatives and moderate republicans, they clearly said that trump is not pulling the party trump, on the contrary, creates problems for the party, and trump,

on the contrary, prevents the republicans from taking the majority and prevents the republicans from continuing to work with the population and get a victory. now even the republican media has attacked trump, that is, even the same foxes who previously adored him. after this defeat of trump in the elections, they were the first . who accused him of this, that is, as some of my american colleagues said. it's clear, it's clear, well, look, here he is, so far, such a confrontation is verbal with the candidate from flora, where is desantis, how dangerous can this be for trump? that is, you say he has already lost, but can this desantis have a real chance to become the next, i wanted to say become the next president of the united states of america, not to become the next candidate from the republican party in the fight for the presidential seat, in fact, he is already being

prepared for this, uh, you understand, when trump flew into the distance just the day before the election, i would start in to blame for this, even there he briefly hinted that in general, if trapp had not svasified the elections, he would never have become the governor in the 18th year. well, there was a very dirty game played at a distance - it did not answer and the next day with 20% in front - this is the best result for the republic blica he won and became florida again now we see that he has the official support of mcconnell the leader of the republicans in the senate mccarthy hydrorepublican in the house of representatives adamakinsingir one song of the party and even according to some rumors he was supported by mike pence the former former vice president, in addition to the paratroopers, now has a lot of meetings with donors and sponsors of the republican party, to which trump does not currently have access, and very recently, just after the election, a survey was conducted regarding the support of republican voters

regarding the support of certain politicians paratroopers ahead of trump in support of the grassroots electorate by 7%. this is the first time that any of the republican politicians in the last few years is ahead of trump in this indicator, that is, in fact, everything it looks like trump, if he wants to fight for a seat from the party in the 24th year, he will have to face a very powerful and already quite popular distance, that is, the era of trump is over, you can even say that it has not seriously begun, well, at least it is ending, let's have one more question about the american elections later about other things but joe biden, everyone is talking about the fact that he is going to run for the democratic party, in your opinion, will he announce it or not? i think he will not announce it of a political nature here will rather be a question of a physiological nature because many people, even within the democratic party itself, are worried

about his ability to withstand such a work pace at such an age and even after 24 years ago, in fact, so far it is difficult for me to comment on this nomination, unfortunately, at the moment apart from him, there are no such bright leaders of the moderate wing of the party, that is, in contrast to the republicans, where at least you and i can analyze the various leadership options of the democrats, while the alternatives biden is not there, and this can actually create certain problems for the party. because if the republics are already thinking about who they will nominate in the 24th year, the democrats can only hope for the health and energy reserves of biden himself. participation in today's program, as always, there were e-e answers to these questions that i asked you, the answers that we need, thank you, thank you very much . konstantinov political scientist, internationalist ms.

vira i congratulate you good day thank you for joining the program today ms. vira i will now remind our viewers, those who watch on youtube, of a question that we have answered and so i ask you to also answer this question so the question is why putin does not go to he did not go to the g20 summit at the ball, he is afraid 88% answered, he is too busy with russian issues 5% your option 7% 538 people voted but ms. viru how would you answer why he is afraid he was afraid to go well i i would say that my option is that there is absolutely nothing for him to do there. and of course his protocol services decided that well, in order not to humiliate the tsar of obstruction on the part of other leaders, they decided to send the minister of foreign affairs of russia

lavrov, so i would say here what he is afraid of is the factor, he is afraid of losing his face. it seems to me, well, more than he has already destroyed. well, we still have to try, so i think that the reason is precisely to prevent the manipulation of the rashin media themselves regarding the situation on the forum. well, do you think lavrov will be humiliated? i think that we will see a number of such excesses of a protocol nature. of course, the countries of the same g seven, in the face of the key leaders of great britain and the united states, will unequivocally talk about the role of russia in destabilizing the global economy and, of course, make every effort to explain to other leaders that

russia has no place in the g20, just as russia had no place in the g8 after the attempted annexation of ukrainian crimea, so we will be at the same time. i agree with my colleagues and in the opinion that putin's issue is not the key issue at this summit at the moment, the issue of a bilateral meeting between the united states and the people's republic of china, and this will be the main vector, so to speak, that will determine the further fate of the organization and, after all, bilateral and multilateral relations over the perspective just by the way i think the meeting has already started and there are many things that will be heard behind closed doors and those things that the parties will then broadcast on the air exactly and will determine the global multipolar order, uh, in what place in russia already there is no more, oh, i wish there was really no

place for russia in this world, well, at least that russia, which is now, well, russia at all. okay, well, mrs. vera. please tell me, then, is it losing the east or not , because lately, for example, if you take the sos summit in samarkand on or the summit of the turkic peoples , the samarkand pump, the president of tajikistan said about such a statement against putin at the summit of the turkic peoples, the president of kazakhstan also said that he, what his country adheres to the policy of, and what not it is necessary to violate the sovereignty and territorial integrity of any country, so putin is losing, well, at least central asia, let’s say. so, let’s start with central, then we will go further . processes that are already underway in the region, the

countries are looking for regional formats of cooperation involving non-regional players such as turkey, and at the same time, the countries are trying, let's say, not to provoke russia into steps that can threaten the national interests and national security of these countries, we know that there are points of tension in the region between kyrgyzstan and tajikistan, there are points of tension that allow us to talk about the danger that putin's regime can carry with it, at the same time there is the issue of afghanistan, which is key for the central asian asian countries and the issue of cooperation in transport corridors, the creation of logistics hubs, there is a range of issues that need to be resolved, but again there is a key point that worries me

the russian federation is still the same partner of these countries, even if we don't like it, and the russian federation puts pressure on these countries to help it bypass or reduce the effects of the sanctions regimes that were introduced in connection with the full-scale invasion of ukraine and, of course , national interests of these countries, which if you look at the map, they are actually squeezed in this geopolitical space between china, turkey and russia, and my question is how these countries, at the expense of non-regional players, can reduce risks to national security, so it is possible to talk about the fact that russia is losing influence in these countries and in this region at the same time regarding the leveling of the russian factor. well, it seems to me that it is premature when i see the strengthening of such players as

turkey, but you all just mentioned the samarkand summit on november 11, i see the strengthening of the chinese dimension, i also see the steps of the european union and the united states of america in the region, but it is too early to talk about the fact that russia has lost central asia. and if we go a little further east to southeast asia . for example, at the summit in cambodia with lavrov, who was also present and the minister of foreign affairs of russia, he said that he did not manage to advance his own agenda regarding the war in ukraine, so that we should even be there about it they did not talk about how the situation in russia is developing, the first question is that russia is really trying to sell this e-e epic with its full-scale invasion of a sovereign state not only in central asia or there in the region of southeast asia, this is a systematic propaganda

work that has been going on for the ninth month and of course there are counter-narratives which the countries in these regions perceive perfectly well, and therefore, let's say, russian diplomacy has big problems with promoting its rashin narratives, this issue seems to me to be the most offensive of all arsen in cambodia plus, if you look at the same meetings of the un security council there, you will see the completely understandable approach of the countries that support ukraine, the statements that are being made , and you will also see the camp of the countries that take a neutral position, so to speak are trying to take a neutral position at the same time as russia's attempts to somehow explain its territorial claims and colonial claims to the countries of the region there, especially southeast asia or perhaps the middle east,

this is a narrative that is not accepted, at the same time for us, i would say that we should not just redouble our efforts the participation and accession of ukraine to asean and the participation of the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine at the forum in cambodia is a great signal that we are currently reviewing not just our europe-oriented vector from the point of view of expanding national interests of the national representation we also actively interact, we try to actively interact with other regions, including the countries of southeast asia, it is also important for me. the answer is because it is unrealistically short time, but there was information that iran has suspended the shipment of its hadrons to russia, what could this indicate, but was briefly scared or something? i think that patrushev's visit is such a version

among our expert colleagues, it is precisely because of the fact that the russian federation actually deceived the iranians, and the dissatisfaction of the iranians regarding their involvement in the direct confrontation with the war in ukraine is a kind of signal that the iranian national interests of russia the federation does not take into account at all, and the iranian side does not like it very much, but at the same time, without me, i would not say that there is an agreement that russia is promoting regarding the supply of weapons from the beginning, that it is already there. i think that, unfortunately, there is an agreement, but is it russia will use it. well, we will watch. we will watch. thank you, mrs. vira, for taking part in the program .