these sold their goods in russia, then received money for it from the russian elite who invested, and now this dependence must be stopped and it must be understood that not supporting ukraine. this means not supporting oneself. to prevent this, by the way, the president of lithuania is talking about the same thing. yes, he said that the incident that happened in poland on november 15. it may happen again. we need to react to a similar threat from provocative russia, he says. let's hear from the president, if russia continues on this path , it is possible that such incidents as in poland may happen again. i don't want to scare you, but this is a threat provoked by russia that we must respond to in order to ensure the safety of our people. well

, immediately after this incident happened in poland and the ukrainian side began to talk about the need to close the skies of ukraine. official kyiv has been talking about this since february 24, 2022. germany strongly condemns the russian attacks on ukraine, which caused the rocket to fall on the territory of poland but continues to speak out against closing the sky over ukraine, this was stated by the representative of the press service of the federal government of germany , wolfreng buhnet, at a briefing in berlin on wednesday , the correspondent of ukrinform reports, when asked whether berlin and other capitals will reconsider their attitude to the possibility of closing the sky over ukraine, he noted that the creation of a no-love zone creates a direct risk of conflict between nato and russia. and all allies share the opinion that they want to prevent further escalation of the war in ukraine today paul's fear is not to allow an escalation, somehow

to infiltrate russia, or somehow not to touch and offend the kremlin, and in particular regarding the closing of the sky over ukraine, because we see that rockets are flying, or let's say that as a result of the russian-ukrainian war, rockets are already flying in poland. this can lead to europe , that is, what europe can get as a result of this. why are they so slow? why do they not want to be included in the general security scheme of european security? because ukraine is a european state. is in the center of europe and is not hindered by fear until

now. the world and with china for 20 let's not make a fuss about nuclear last year, of course it looks somehow bad sometimes, and secondly, they are also afraid of what will happen if they start raising rates, will it start some kind of uncontrolled process in relation to russia, they this this too, not everyone is afraid of the nightmare, you need to give credit to the west, too, uh, there is a tendency that putin does not see him as he is, well, about the second army of the world, everything is clear, almost everyone in the whole world, but many other moments still treat our allies, they are not yet supply us with many important

types of weapons, these and missiles, we will increase the radius of drones and armored vehicles, well, actually, planes, and that is why they are in this circle. it makes good use of weakness. that is, we have constant support for ukraine, but the desire to go to the next stage always requires very difficult and painful discussions in the west . he acquired all these opportunities where he took

financial resources for this and this work on mistakes has not yet begun . this kind of work on mistakes, i emphasize, must necessarily be in europe and then they will stop being endlessly afraid and will leave their mentality that everything in life must be insured, but we are still fighting for ourselves, but we are also fighting for the poles, someone is sure in paris, they think that the war will not reach them, but anything can happen to this russia, and this is constantly but very gradually entering the minds of our uh, our friends, therefore, on the

one hand, the support is consistent. yes, we are very grateful for it, it is truly unprecedented, but west must overcome his tag to see putin and his regime as they are. this is how you are now. i see a picture on the screen. you show putin. putin is sitting around him. he is there, or whatever they call it in russia, and we need to stop being afraid of them and understand that if we are afraid of russia so who are we still afraid of china we are afraid of whom we are afraid we need to finally put an end to all fear what measure has always had and still partly has in relation to the russian regime friends we are at the same time live on the espresso tv channel and also on our social networks on youtube and facebook. if you are currently watching us on social networks, please like this video so that it can be

promoted in the youtube trends on youtube. you can also find a sponsor button under this video, you can become a sponsor of our channel, participate in the creation of our content financially, we will thank you for any support on our broadcast pavlo klimkin politician diplomat minister of foreign affairs of ukraine in 2014-2019 well, mr. pavlo, i can't help but ask you about what preceded actually yesterday, and the shelling, the massive shelling of the russian territory of this territory of ukraine, the big summit at the ball is called the big twenty, the president of ukraine is called the big 19, because putin did not come there, sergey lavrov came there the day before, the two leaders from of the floating states of america and china, because biden and xi jinping and actually what was said at

the meeting already after the meeting that these two countries agreed or at least articulate that a nuclear war should never be waged oppose the threat of using nuclear weapons in ukraine, and about the fact that the united states of america and china will compete in the world, but this should not develop into a further conflict. at the summit, zelensky spoke online and said that he has a 10-point formula for peace, which he made public again, russia did not take an active part in the discussion of what zelensky said, there were only lavrov's comments that it was unacceptable for russia, but considering this beck who was before a massive missile attack on the territory of ukraine, did biden and everyone is ding-ping, considering that russia is considered a

proxy state of china, and china should somehow put it in place or at least explain to putin that he should not, er, launch a terrorist war against ukraine and should not have this war at all, these wars should not be chinese official factors , experts are constantly trying to convince everyone that china cannot order putin, i don't know how to order, but to say things that putin will consider not simply in the presence of attention, we unfortunately lost contact with pavel klimkin, a very unstable connection mobile connection pavlo klimkin disconnects from the mobile internet, unfortunately, his home internet does not work, which he warned about this at the beginning of the program, we are talking about the situation that

arose after the fall of a rocket on the territory of poland on the evening of november 15 and about the world's reaction to this well, and of course, we are talking about those events that are happening synchronously in parallel with this massive missile attack, mr. pavlo, you are in touch with us again, yes, sergey, and the connection is now such that we have this connection. excuse me, the main thing is that we i am just repeating the topic about the g20 summit and the importance of biden's meeting with the chinese leader. a couple of days ago, all the world's media very simply looked carefully at all the gestures of who was shaking hands with whom. how many steps does it take? how many steps

? and i have the impression that the meeting was not a failure. i believe that the order of the position, the meeting was even successful, in particular, this agreement about blinkin's visit to china is worth a lot to me as well. it is important that bydeny all came out of meetings in general with a good sense of humor with a good mood of course they have fundamental differences , this and taiwan in the first place and not only, but it is important that china in relation to russia took a very consistent position and said for the first time to close with all their words about the use of nuclear

weapons it's not just unacceptable, we'll beat you for it. second moment. it's important that china put pressure on russia with the fact that putin started preparing not for the negotiations that they constantly offer there, but for real negotiations precisely before real where we and the west will act from a position of strength well, and the third point, in my opinion, it would be significant for china to start helping ukraine more now, i tried to convey to our western friends the idea that china could help us in real time with the restoration of the energy infrastructure the potential of the industrial chinese

allows it, i know what they said about it, the answer is from china, we will hear it in the near future there of course there are nuances and china will not surrender to putin, we understand this perfectly but nevertheless, the meeting of the twenty was it's not just a humiliation for putin, putin behaved absolutely rude, well, first of all, he didn't even address other world leaders online, and i think that the main reason why he didn't go to the ball is not his health, or his desire to be in moscow, or something political considerations or reluctance to listen to hard things, and it's just that he's afraid, he's afraid to fly to the ball, he's afraid that someone there will eliminate him, this is

fear, and that's why he also refused to participate online, just to say that there was no participation, but the reason is clear to everyone and the world leaders, whether western or non-western, will remember it. and as for lavrov, it was actually something, the devil, that from the side of bows, he met with the chinese minister, he is the whole of the un, and at that, well, really. goodbye and it means less than nothing. and this decision of putin not to go to the twenties and it will backfire on him, it will come back with a boomerang, because in russian liters they felt it, they felt that putin ceases to be, as many considered, a geopolitical genius a player and he is increasingly excluded, and not those of the world, but only from the forum that

unites the western and non-western world, and together with the defeat around kherson - this, of course, will cost him such monstrous shelling, therefore, of course , and the preparation of an attack from the territory of belarus, the desire is very emotional putin is still on this to take revenge on that reason, in fact and emotional irrational, they understood this enough, mr. pavel, doesn't the absence of putin at this summit of the g20 mean that this twenty really as zelensky said, it turned into the 19th and that well, it is necessary to record that russia falls out of the 20 countries that actually rule the world or have influence in the world and eventually put an end to this story if a person simply deliberately does not want to communicate with the

leaders of other countries and instead of that, on the same day, hmm, he is holding a council, talking about some historical roots and a historical basis in order to renew some historical justice there, motivating his citizens to go to war for ukraine, or shouldn’t we just take them and take russia and throw them out of the 20 to vote because a person does not want to work in the big 20, then let him do his pyramid schemes there somewhere. no, he wants to, but they don't want him, and that's the main thing, of course. it would be great and very nice if the request was excluded there. and they showed it on the spot, so far, in fact, russia is not even a player and not a member of the twenty. lavrov came there, took a spin and left, but we perfectly understand that the formal

exclusion of russia has not yet happened. we know very well that some countries do not want this no, no, because, as i said, they love or respect russia there, but they just use it, and it’s not only china, for example, south africa, and i think that now russia needs to fundamentally exclude all the manufacturers of structures, it is not capable of creating any positive influence. it has transformed on the world hooligan, who are the other types and the criminal hooligan status was known for a long time and now russia is a criminal - these are crimes against humanity - these are war crimes, these are shelling , such as yesterday, this is a typical genocide and i am very

i hope that this will then be proven in international courts and all world leaders perfectly understand that meeting with criminals and meeting with the previous putin are, as they say in odessa, two big differences and biden. as you remember, he once called putin criminals in a different text. i think that yes, putin is seen more and more in the world, the video was named by mr. but there are no chances here, that is, this simply needs to be completely eliminated before the complete reboot of this regime, that is, the complete stateization of this country, if you are accurate, mr. pavlo, he is his called him a murderer and not a criminal, as far as i remember. it was in june of last year, after meeting with putin, he had to leave. and that was it, and he killed everything when he was

asked in an interview, and he called himself a criminal in one speech when answering questions well , if it is murder, then by definition he is a criminal, but he didn't say that today, mr. pavlo , there is another seventh meeting in the rammstein format. we will hear them agree to negotiations. lloyd austin has caused another wave of massive rocket attacks on e ukrainian cities, in particular, we have seen one fatal hit on the territory of poland. we understand how important it is now to gather all the information to the maximum about this case. and

we see that we need to find out the context in which this event took place, russia is as aggressive as possible, that is, such active bombing will frighten the ukrainian people and contribute to negotiations. ukraine is full of determination and we we support ukraine, soon ukraine will receive new donations from our partner countries, mr. pavla, when will the west say what and russia, in what form, in what form it is? it is not acceptable to the entire world community and we must put an end to this criminal terrorist regime of putin. they recognize russia as a terrorist, russia is a sponsor of terrorism in the country and a sponsor of terrorism when these decisive

steps that we are observing now, they will be decisive in one way or another and when the west decides to put an end to putin and russia in the form it is now, so far we can see that part of the west is thinking about what to say with putin. this certainly does not mean that someone is trying to return to normality in relations with putin. yesterday's shelling, well, what prevents declaring russia a sponsor of terrorism? by the way , on november 21, the european parliament is supposed to consider and vote on a resolution to call russia a sponsor of terrorism, so here we are keeping our fingers crossed

so that this happens among oil and european parliamentarians are very cool, but then we need the decisions of the countries, we need the decisions of the americans, the decisions of the british, these are all other national decisions, but these decisions are not accepted because , as you know, they do not negotiate with terrorists, and so far our friends and allies do not exclude the possibility of situational at least the agreement with putin , there is a fundamental problem in this. and i believe that at some point it is necessary, as you and i have already said, to leave this theater and start working on rebooting this regime, not necessarily this speak publicly we remember how the west worked to reboot the soviet union as well as evil,

but if you see and compare today's russia with the breshniv ussr, then the vyzhnytskyi ussr was quite mild compared to today's ivashik and terrorist russian regimes, and that is why it is necessary not to let go of this regime to stop this pitiful tag and say text we do not want a fundamental escalation of this widespread war for this, unfortunately, we do not have the political will, but it could be, but then give us the necessary weapons, give us what we need in order to win back our territory, or when putin wants to launch a new attack from the territory of belarus, just give us a missile, let's increase the radius and say that this means is directed and as soon as we see what kind of attack from the north, then we can

use and new rockets and new sofas and many other things in order to really make a real meat grinder there, that's it. these are the things to show. excuse me, they are very, very important now from the side of nato and our key allies, eh conversations, of course, contacts, it can be anything but i believe in conversations with this regime exclusively from the position of strength, they do not understand any other logic by definition, because what do these missile strikes mean , including yesterday's, really er, crazy in its scale, this means that they want to count us out, they want to delay the event, to say that we have some leverage and to say that they will conduct some future talks, negotiations, what will it be called

, and when it will be, we cannot say yet, because of course there are no conditions for these negotiations. yes we will conduct a show of force, and here we just have to send them, but it is very important to convince them that we could also send them there, very, very far away, where did the third moscow p pavla go, another event happened yesterday, the un general assembly voted in favor of the resolution, the majority of votes were in favor of the resolution to provide means legal protection and reparations in connection with the aggression against ukraine and voted for it from 94 countries against 13 received 74 voted against belarus central african republic china cuba north korea retria ethiopia, iran, malinica, raghua, russia, syria, zimbabwe, russia said that under the oun brand or under the leadership of the un, ukraine just wants to rob the

russian federation. this is the adoption of this resolution. we are already seeing another united nations organization that we have been complaining about for the past eight months. is this after all, an exception to the rules no, this is a very worthy story how important yes , this is a legally non-binding isolation, but an important political signal, it is very sad that after all, china voted against it, it was very important to persuade to refrain, but as you know, when criminals are punished, there should be a very steady line, this means that they have to pay their bills, sentences are handed down not for nothing, when all property is confiscated, but it is very important for us to understand that this is a challenge, it will not be so easy to

confiscate i emphasize confiscating frozen russian assets because there is a legal basis for confiscation both in the states and in europe. but for freezing there is a legal basis for confiscation. so far there is no and we need to prove and prove legally, these assets are criminal, that is, so to speak , to criminalize them. for us, it is clear that the regime is criminal, but legally it is not so easy to prove that there were decisions of national courts, in the west , including in the states, they are very afraid that if these assets are taken away, then who will invest in american securities there. that is, it is not an easy task, but it must be completed, just as it is necessary to complete the task so that the sanctions

that apply to russia or restrictions generate financial resources that go to the budget of ukraine for our recovery for our further struggle, and the same must be done so that, if it turns out that there are western companies that violate sanctions, then we really need to impose severe penalties and fines, and also transfer this money to us so that they support us, all these are not simple things, legal, political, they are absolutely understandable morally understandable but legally they need to be brought to an end and if the criminal is not punished, what is the guarantee that there will not be other criminals in the world who will look and say well, if russia yes, they were punished. well, i will arrange something like this for you in this

world, so bring it to an end. thank you, mr. pavlo , for the conversation. this was pavlo klimkin, a politician, diplomat , minister of foreign affairs of ukraine in 2014-2019 . we talked about the consequences that the world is currently discussing after a missile hit the territory of the republic poland and what the world will be like without russia in the big 20, when the big 20 will turn into the big 19, friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our social networks, join our social networks networks if you are currently watching us on youtube and facebook, please like this video so that it is promoted in the trends of social networks. well , on youtube, under this video, right under the description, you can see a button called sponsor, you

can become a sponsor of our youtube channel, help us develop our informational resources , also remember that we have a website called espresso tv, please type, search in the search engines, we work for you 24 hours a day, seven days a week, the most efficient information from ukraine and the world i say goodbye to you until tomorrow until 17:10 i will have a journalist roman tsimbalyuk goodbye greetings is the freedom of life whose missiles fell on the territory of poland is it of fundamental importance in the conditions when russia is waging a full-scale war against ukraine and how nato will respond to this entire story. my name is vlad and azure. freedom life is broadcast live on the pages of radio freedom on facebook and youtube.