in his opinion, the kremlin, talking about peace negotiations, cancels these efforts by shelling ukrainian cities, global issues of peace and stability were solved, putin uses rockets to attack civilians in ukraine for no reason, we must be frank, these things would not have happened if putin had not unleashed a brutal war after a long dispute, just like that in what format to make a final decision, the leaders of the group of 20 countries decided to adopt a declaration in one of the points of which the majority of leaders condemned russian aggression against ukraine, in particular the resolution of the un general assembly calling on russia to withdraw its troops from the internationally recognized territory of ukraine is mentioned, the dispute was particularly over the russian delegation led by the head of the foreign ministry , sergei lavrov, who yesterday left the island of bali ahead

of time; an agreement was reached on the format of the declaration ; moscow's deposition was described there as a difference of opinion regarding the situation and sanctions; the adopted declaration also positively assessed the continuation the work of the grain corridor across the black sea, which was emphasized separately by the president of turkey at the press conference, the border, i separately mentioned the figure for the shipment of grain, which has now exceeded 10 million tons. also important is the shipment of fertilizers and ammonia, this is still ongoing. as soon as we return from bali, we will discuss this issue with putin and we will work to extend the term of the grain agreement for at least a year, almost all official delegations have already left the island of bali, which hosted this year's summit, the next one in a year will take place in india from the bar serhiy stetsenko krysztof meixner radio freedom of the theory of poland in the office of the

ukrainian president called on european countries to close the sky over ukraine for the sake of their own security, it is meant for the sake of european security, the adviser to the head of the president's office mykhailo podolyak said in particular whether he will be listened to at the event or will they be listened to in nato, we will talk about this now. pavlo klimkin , minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, joins the air. 14-19 years old, good evening . the freedom that russia unleashed against ukraine is actually quite an unprecedented situation. you can clarify now whether there was something similar, but i have a question: can this incident become a turning point in the war, this incident, but i don't want to

call it that's how i think this is the result the russian attack is the death of those uh relatives whose uh relatives we express our condolences, of course, but the responsibility for this is both politically and militarily and of course morally completely they are all cream we also perfectly understand that this maybe not a turning point, but this is a new phase in the internationalization of the conflict, poland in the first place because, to be honest, sometimes when i watch the reports of the western media, i wish they would show more of the results of the russian attack on the territory of ukraine. this is certainly not a competition, so what attention happened in poland and what

happened in ukraine, but it is almost 100 missiles, of course, many of them were shot down, but look at the suffering for people, especially for the elderly , for the children, and it is very important that this does not distract attention i say this without any cynicism , but or the desire to build a balance here, secondly, we have these tragic events, what are the results of the russian strike in poland, we have a real impact on moldova , the blackout of electricity, we have the stoppage of oil transit to hungary and in fact we don't have a military one yet. nevertheless, the conflict is for the west from russia, what they are trying to deny and

it is possible for everyone to avoid it, and it is very important and the sooner the better for them to look at the real situation and see that the risks are growing and visaks and skalatsi are also growing, although i have a certain caution that part of the west, especially the european west, will try, on the contrary, to play on the reduction of rates for what they call de-escalation and even push us to some form of conversation, not now, because now it is impossible by definition, nor political there are no emotional and conditions for negotiations from a position of strength, and there is absolutely no conversation, but in the future they will push for such a conversation, that is, we actually have

a two-way road and in a positive sense where i understood that this war is no longer just a two-sided war, and everyone understood this after yesterday, but it is also clear that someone will get scared and play a game called de-escalation and restrain ukraine, and not restrain putin, and we must avoid this militarily. i understand that in the kremlin is counting on this a lot, and i think that they will play with it together with the increase in energy prices next month, many europeans will receive new bills before that. they received the previous ones and the kremlin is counting on it. with their nuclear threats and nuclear rhetoric, which

, by the way, was directly condemned at the meeting at the summit of the twenty-somethings at the ball to counter with rockets and to counter with the lack of electricity to counter with everything you can actually with the food crisis to counter with a possible migration wave and in general, the kremlin's strategy is now increasingly reduced to countering just to intimidate everyone, you know, probably someone already has, probably what you just announced has the effect of using the kremlin, because i opened twitter literally before the program and it caught my eye from donald trump, the youngest son of donald trump and here he writes that since it was the ukrainian missile that hit our nato ally poland, we can at least now and can we at least now stop spending billions on their weapons , that is, i understand that the kremlin is partially

achieving its goals here i think that there is a part of trump’s turning, i won’t talk about all of them, which is clearly dependent on the russian regime and russia, i won’t state this unequivocally about trump, although he repeatedly said that even if such a russian and many other things, but part of his environment from the point of view of how they imagine the world really bothers me, and the tweet you just read is actually a great example , your colleague andriy deshchytsia, a diplomat , joined our broadcast right in front of you, he said that he oh what kind of reaction do you expect from nato to strengthen air defense over ukrainian skies

? ideally, what kind of reaction do you expect from nato now? this is what we expect, as we understand and it is a necessary step . but i think that it is necessary to start a real conversation , not a discussion and confidential. and how to qualitatively improve the supply of weapons. and how to supply new air defense systems. how to supply new attack systems. that the kremlin is preparing for an attack from the territory of belarus, serious preparations are underway there, more and more waxes, more and more training, i would say as a means of deterrence in a direct text,

maybe it will be confidential, but for direct tests we we are giving ukraine new weapons, new missiles with a long range, new drones, and they can be fully used if such an influx from the northern flank goes ahead, so far there is no consensus and there is no consensus decision of the west to provide us with new weapons, but we very much hope that this will happen in the near future and so such er measures signal messages as you like this is called deterrence in relation to the russian attack from belarus they are ending now er are needed well together with the signals that we are talking about now thank you very much for joining pavlo klimkin, minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, was on radio svoboda for 14-19 years. thank you

for ukraine, the united states of america, the number one strategic partner . where does it take place, can lend-lease become a guarantee of long-term support for ukraine from the us and why does the white house not dare to recognize russia as a state sponsor of terrorism, i asked oksana markarova about this in an exclusive interview, listen to a fragment of the head of the pentagon. he talks about this and often repeats this thesis that the usa will be with ukraine as long as necessary. help from the united states, well, first of all, these words are not only spoken by secretary austin, these words are spoken by president biden

, these words are spoken by secretary blinken, these words are spoken by congress, these words are spoken by everyone our long-term cooperation is based, first of all, america is our strategic partner, if you remember in the 21st year during the visit of president zelensky to the united states, an agreement was reached in several areas, first we signed and updated our strategic partnership charter, this is a very important document signed in november 21 of the year, which is very large, and if you read it, in fact, there are a lot of things that we now receive and cooperate with. they are laid down in this document . signed the morning security agreement on security strategic cooperation for 5 years, this agreement is not public, but i can tell you that there is such a summary about it, which is published on the website of the ministry of defense and at the pentagon, but the development of the

key areas of our military cooperation is also based on a lot on these documents, therefore, on the one hand, we have strategic documents on which we are based, and for me, as an ambassador, it was also extremely important at the beginning of my term to work on them, and we signed very there are many such documents, the second issue is the issue of congressional support, if you look at the declarations of the congresses, well, for almost all time, and especially now, you will see that this long-term support is confirmed by legislative acts and congressional resolutions, therefore. well, the most important thing is our relations between our two nations , of course, as you say, who can provide a guarantee , well, in any international policy , you have to constantly work on everything and even when all the strategic documents are signed, it is still a constant

work 24/7 and lend-lease can be such a guarantee . see, eh. well, lend-lease is one of the tools by which we can receive security assistance . at the moment, we will receive it free of charge . that is, we will receive grants under three programs under the action of the usa and the fms receive equipment and security assistance. when there are no funds allocated by congress to receive the same equipment free of charge, we will theoretically be able to receive the same equipment . this is exactly what lend-lease provides. but why should we take a lend-lease now? well, that is in leasing or renting, i.e. paying money for it if our partner strategically provides us with this assistance now for free , you can watch the full interview with oksana markarova today on youtube radio svoboda at 8:00 p.m. and in the meantime, the ukrainian military informed the united states and its allies that

they tried to intercept a russian missile during and near the site of a missile attack on poland with the help of air defense equipment, the american tv channel cnn e reports with reference to an anonymous american official we will wait for the reaction of the ukrainian side. but in the meantime, the ukrainian authorities have doubts that the missile that fell in poland the day before belonged to the ukrainian air defense forces, at least publicly, according to the results of the supreme commander-in-chief's rate a-a, which took place today , the secretary of the national security and defense council, oleksiy danilov, said. well, and oleg katkov, editor-in-chief of the defense-express military portal, joins our broadcast. good evening. please tell me, judging by the photos and videos that are on the internet from the place where the missile fragments fell, how specialist, can you make any conclusion about

the fact that it was a missile. who could it belong to , where could it fly or could it have been shot down by the air defense forces of ukraine ? well, i'm sorry here. the fact is that explosives specialists, military personnel , are working on the spot to inspect the scene of the event and the incident. specialists and earn some kind of analysis based on individual fragments from the photo, where there is even well, there is simply no, even i do not know there a banal ruler for assessing the scale, well, it is well, i would say that a person who can say that he can do it well, the question for her will be more about his expertise than for the one who will say that it is extremely difficult or impossible in principle, but here the point is that the question is actually whose is this rocket and how did it fly, what is its tracker, where was it launched from, in fact on mine nato already had a look, well, right away. the

fact is that in the sky of poland, according to the data of the flight radar, in particular, during well, somewhere at the level of 15-30 local time, there were at least three military aircraft of the united states - this is an air tanker of some kind of her 135 and this indicates well, extremely great activity precisely the aviation in this area, in the lublin area, there is about 100 km to the scene of the incident. well, it's just a child's distance. let's put it this way, and it speaks of the extremely high activity of aviation, because 30 captains of this class - this means that there were fighter jets in the air, maybe and other planes, in addition, thanks to the story of canadian journalists who visited one of the avacs, which in 24/7 mode guard right near the border with ukraine in the sky of poland , its district is known.

advances, but their display depends solely on the e-e transponder on the plane itself, and it is possible to make, well, quite, well, guesses, but it is quite certain that moreover, during a large-scale missile attack, there were advance planes in the sky of poland, and they already see, well, ob objects at ranges of up to at least 500 km, and considering all that and all 800 km ago, nato has 100% all the information about whose missile i was and how it flew and where nato has this information from, then it is probably already allies nato somehow passed this one information to the ukrainian authorities, based on what yenstonberg and the polish president said, they admit that it could have been a ukrainian air defense missile, but we can see that, for example, the ukrainian authorities say that they have doubts about this. do you understand that

these doubts are based on that? doubt is based , for example, on information about the use of missiles, that is, if, for example, there were launches. esterista that did not detonate on earth. that is, the president of poland, duda, said that no traces of the detonation of the combat unit a were found in the explosion of solid fuel, that is, the remains of the fuel from the anti-aircraft missile are allegedly there . well, it is possible that the wreckage shown in these photos was found, uh, again, the question is whether those photos are from this place of events, but they are identified by some vehicles as debris from the s300 s-missile,

and the s300 missile has radio guidance commands. that is it is for hitting the target, it is guided to it and actually controlled from the ground. well, not by the operator, by the algorithm. but nevertheless, the radio command is transmitted over the radio channel, and in this case, when the missile, for example, crosses the border with another country, it is trivial. we are talking about the fact that at that time there were nato planes in the sky of poland, well, with a huge probability well, let's say that the missile self-detonated, and it does not happen by hitting the ground, but happens on the contrary, it goes up and there is already a child and there are others scenarios, for example, the one that, if i correctly understood the words of the president of poland duda again, that the federation had launched missiles that were flying along the border with poland and were supposed to go down, reach, well, enter the targets from the west, that is,

an unpredictable course for the means of anti-flood defense of ukraine, and then if they and were fired upon , well, theoretically, only theoretically, of course, only theoretically, but a possible scenario is that the s-300 anti-aircraft missile there hits the bed of the missile and knocks it down. at the same time, it must be understood that the s300 missile is a huge product, that is, it is not a small rocket for us, it is a meter long, roughly speaking, it is a huge rocket , the length is logically, i am not mistaken, about 8 m, and if not more, it is a powerful thing and, of course, huge and simply banal in terms of its inertia, well , let's say so, part of it is already without combat, that is, exactly the engine itself, roughly speaking, it can fly there by inertia and along a certain trajectory, probably a distance , and this is also clear, and another scenario that is possible also does not exclude the fact that anti-aircraft missiles are often used for 300 for strikes on ground targets, and this is a proven fact, and the

range of these strikes is more than 100 km, and if , for example, the launch area of ​​belarus was used for this, then there are approximately 120, 130, depending on where exactly the launch area was, and the fact is that when the s300 is launched at such a range, it is no longer controlled and simply divides the ruts. it loses control somewhere at a height of about one and a half kilometers, depending on the topography of the area, and after that it already falls, as if simply by the force of gravity, roughly speaking, that is, not it is also managed in the u.s. it is also worth turning it off for a year because the u.s. launches in the northern regions from the territory of belarus with missiles from the 300 were also recorded, and you, for example, from the news. i see

that there were two news there, either s300 or x101, i don’t know how much there is a fundamental difference between them, but ha ha, that is, not xha ha ha, in russian, it’s cyrillic, there hust 101 is an air-based cruise missile or a base that the russians regularly use, the s-300 missile is, well, the s300 energeti missile is also from an anti-aircraft missile complex with 300 there are also other indices, they are different. by the way , that is, we are talking about what is most often found. that is, i do not want to choose any of them . there is a russian trace. that is, this is an official statement. the ukrainian side is also asking to allow representatives of ukraine to the site of the explosion. but i have one more question. tell me, well, we ca

n’t. so en masse as the day before ukrainian cities, it was not even a question, uh, well, the situation when a russian missile flies, for example, into the territory of another country, has already happened and is repeated, this is the aspect when cruise missiles of the russian federation fly over moldova, a third country, one of them, by the way, has already fallen on its territory in this situation, taking into account what we are saying about the use of missiles by registries, well, in practice, the practice here is as it is, which demonstrate rather low, well, let's say, low reliability and low accuracy that is, we are talking about the fact that the missiles deviate from the missile's course and simply fall somewhere, frankly speaking, and well, here it is only a matter of time when this missile will fly into the territory of ukraine, nato, it is only a matter of time, it is not a question of whether it will happen at this time it's already very short, you can now

say how many missiles are left in ukraine because there are such brave people who say that uh, not in ukraine. i apologize in russia because there are such brave people who say that all of russia has already exhausted its stock of missiles , or maybe or maybe about that someone is absolutely sure to know how many missiles are left in russia, well, there was official information from the administration of the minister of defense of ukraine, as of october 10, it was about 400 air-class missiles, well, air-based missiles, 101 kha-55, approximately the same number relative to sea-based caliber and about 1,000 iskander ballistic missiles, and here, in other aspects, it is important here, it’s just a correlation, thanks to the fact that the russians are striking massing blows, and there is a certain pause between them, that is, most likely for in order to accumulate, not to walk around, but to accumulate the stockpile of these missiles is excluded, and there is to

lay down a flight task for them to prepare the planes for this operation, it takes them about two weeks now, 100 such pauses, thank you very much oleg kartkov, editor of the military portal defect express was on radio svoboda and then we can show you a video of what people in the liberated kherson region say, this village is a de-occupied village. the inhabitants shared with journalists how they lived during the russian occupation, listen to how it was the first occupations. it was very difficult. there was no water. there was nothing. if it wasn’t for lena and vova, they helped us and dragged us food and water, and we survived here. i took someone else’s cow and killed it right in my bed. what is the name of these projectiles? 155 i have already learned local people died, some prices died, men,

women died on july 19, july 19, my father, and after 40 days , it was exactly 40 days, my mother, on august 28, and it fell directly in the same place . everything was seen in the store on the street nothing toilet aids yes, i’m talking because there are telephones, take away the phones and the kadirovs were and were russians, all of them were two guys, they took them and what about those guys, they just didn’t deliver boxes to me, so there are a lot of mines there, well, you did n’t go, they told us what they did dogs, yes, people,

brothers, white, yes, older. i included 65 years old. i also didn’t see the investigation, it’s not soldiers, you understand, guys, i’m just, i can’t tell you who these homeless people are , not homeless people. look tv, i'm talking about what kind of tv, there's been no communication for 8 months, well, my children left and because of the children, with grief in half, they all climbed in. there was a car nine

christmas trees in the garage, i took it with an ax. on may day, it fell once into the yard, the second time into the house - you can drive right into the house to see how they managed it, they did all their work at the head of their motor churches, bastards, everything, glory to ukraine, it was a blessing kherson region, radio svoboda journalists are working so that you will be the first to learn about what is happening in the liberated regions and regions of ukraine. well, i encourage you to subscribe to the pages of radio svoboda in social networks instagram telegram twitter facebook and also two youtube channels radio svoboda and radio svoboda ukraine svoboda life will be broadcast tomorrow. let's see how

people who suffer from rheumatism and arthrosis live. they heard that the weather is changing, right ? relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves the mobility of the joints because the joints are already broken the only yellow cream for pain in the joints and back buy with a 15% discount dolgit cream 100 g in pharmacies pharmacy ans pharmacy kopyka and pharmacy shar greetings, dear viewers, to your attention the final news release and let's start from operational information from