and the peace war because of the fact that russia is ready to play with such russians . может быть в работь a-ah and что дальше может быть in europe, you are both parties in europe, and we will have to prepare for this, and we will all be blessed now, eh, the name is now, so that we, uh, removed putin with the owners sitting there, i clearly stole it it is clear that everything you will do will destroy europe a please tell me if you don't have the feeling that nato countries are too unprepared for the transfer of the war to the escalation of the war now, well, nato is always ready and doesn't even bother itself there, uh, the blood structure is waiting too much for the next one. and what about russia

, uh, well, how in the case of russia, it turned out perfectly. all of us are not ready for war. russia cannot fight the power of any country in the world. yes, and the americans themselves. yes, i can tell you like a scream the secret of the americans of our details . that's a serious army for such a game my shield is actually where it is. can you tell me the third peace and war army which can’t be in ivan the norm but which i found their leadership stolen from them and all they have left bones they have very little left of those cowardly soldiers who don’t want to fight at all and in they are not nothing but you are one country and i would indeed if the army of senegal could not better fight with you and russia and has it not changed in recent days maybe even in weeks the mood inside the united states of america regarding the

support of ukraine we have seen that there were such dramatic elections, something has changed during this time. yes , i remember. i think that it will be sad in ukraine in america. america and i, it was a window, well, we have a village, two parties , plus the lukan and democratic parties, this is important now in ukraine, and i work in poland, the names of the republican party, how are they, the student, the democratic cards, you said, you said that the situation can worsen, how much or can the financial and military support of ukraine in this war from the us end at all? well, you

know that ukrainians often say that you have 5 billion dollars . and before the war in ukraine, 55 billion dollars, which means that the deficit is really grave, and how do you understand it there, this is a personal question. thank you very much. it was jason jayso marta , an american political scientist and a political expert. they discussed the consequences of the fall of missiles on the territory of poland. how is it, how is it seen in the united states of america? now we will talk about the same topic with ihor reiterovych, a political scientist and head of political and legal programs of the public organization ukrainian center for social development. i hope that now he should just join

our broadcast, and i will remind our viewers that during the large-scale oz shelling of the russian territory, the ukrainian territory. i apologize on behalf of russia a more old ked was released, infrastructure objects were damaged, but as a result of these attacks , several rockets fell on the territory of eastern poland and , unfortunately, they were killed, but right now you can see the consequences in these photos, eh, there was a meeting of the un security council regarding this, and let me they say that the political scientist ihor retrovych is already joining our broadcast, i hope that now we will start with him seeing yes so let's talk about the consequences of the fall of these missiles on the territory of poland, we see that the reaction is actually very restrained just now we talked with an american political scientist, they basically say that support in ukraine after such events will remain at a reliable level, what do you

think, mr. igor, what can change as a result of this event, well, in fact, the war is already knocking on the door of the border of nato, there will definitely be some changes in the attitude european countries and nato countries to what is happening but i think that it will not work in the direction that the russian federation also expected, support for ukraine will not only not decrease, but it will increase by and large why because there is an increasingly clear understanding that russia is not yet going to end these barbaric terrorist attacks, at least in the near future, and it is clear that since they are occurring throughout the territory of ukraine, there is a high probability that some part of them may be directly or indirectly, i will say that now now we still have to restore communication well, unfortunately, we see that precisely as a result of the quiet shelling that we are talking about now, ukrainians cannot function normally due to the blackout and during our national

the only news of the marathon, unfortunately, we also often have to deal with this situation, so to speak. well, for now, we are waiting to see what we have or whether we can have other experts join us in the future. flight mech 17, the court session in gaza will take place at 2:30 p.m. kyiv time. prosecutors demand life imprisonment for four people with russian and ukrainian citizenship. in july 2014, there were 283 passengers and 15 crew members on board the liner, all of them died, the international investigative team came to the conclusion that the plane was shot down by an anti-aircraft missile system, it belonged to the 53rd anti-aircraft missile brigade of the russian

armed forces, stationed in kursk, the verdict in the case less than 17 will be very important for the future prosecution of the military-political leadership of russia, according to oleksandr banyk of the senior group of prosecutors in the national criminal proceedings about the plane crash, my colleague olena revska spoke to the prosecutor, look, my investigation ends with the verdict of the court, and we will continue to collect evidence and establish other culprits in this case. i welcome you to the first channel of public broadcasting. thank you very much for visiting us. good day, november 17, the court in in the netherlands, a

verdict is to be handed down in the case of the downing of flight mh17 in the sky over donbas in 2014. you and your colleagues from the prosecutor general's office have been working on this case for a long time. of course, there is such a thing. question, what are your expectations from this sentence? well , first of all, i would like to remind you that , on july 17, 2014, a tragedy of a global scale occurred, as a result of which 298 people died, and for any prosecutor, for any law enforcement system, there is the priority is to bring the guilty to criminal responsibility, so we first of all expect justice from the court and that the punishment will be the most severe, this is a life sentence, and the prosecutors in the case in the court in the netherlands are demanding life imprisonment for four

of the participants in this case, i would like to remind our viewers that the four defendants are three citizens of russia, among whom mr. girkin is known to many of our viewers , and there is one citizen of ukraine. in the netherlands, how is this work related to what is happening and will happen in the netherlands? well, ukraine, as well as other participants in the e-e investigation, such as belgium, australia, the netherlands and malaysia were registered national proceedings that in the 14th year also in that year, an agreement was signed on the creation of a joint investigative group, which representatives of these five countries are investigating and obtaining evidence in their territory in accordance with the agreement and in the netherlands it is also

national proceedings, and in accordance with the agreement between the netherlands and ukraine, it was determined that it was in the netherlands that the trial to bring to justice those responsible for this tragedy will take place, let's remind our audience that the investigation established that these four defendants were involved in the transportation of the beech of this installation, which was the one that shot down the mh17 plane, to the place from where the actual launch took place correctly, so together with the key group e-e, almost the entire path from russia to ukraine to the position from where the missile was launched was established and this was obtained with the help and as testimony of witnesses, as well as traffic and interception of conversations, and the involvement of these persons in this tragedy and in the delivery of this particular party was fully established

but i want to warn you that at the moment there is still no court decision. i do not have to adhere to the prezen price of guilt and i cannot say that they are guilty of shooting down this plane at the moment and only according to the court's verdict will the person really be brought to justice, the investigation did not give a direct answers to the question who gave the order to specific people to use this missile against a passenger plane now, according to the results of the case materials that are the work that you and your colleagues from other countries carried out, is there anything that directly connects this installation buk from the russian state, yes, in the materials of the pre-trial investigation, these evidences are available and they were presented in the district court of the city of the hague during

the trial of this, all these are confirmations that were given to the court and investigated by the court, can you give an example of what this is order as well as interception of e-e information from other sources such as there e-mail addresses and the like and we also if i understand correctly we can say that this buk installation was on the weapons of a unit of the russian armed forces yes well, this will already be determined by the decision of the court itself, the verdict that we will hear on november 17 will give to ukraine and what it can change for russia, well, let's say so first of all, i want to note that this is the decision of the national court, eh, but such a decision is any -any other evidence of the aggression of the russian federation against ukraine, they are very important for ukraine in particular for ukraine

's further actions on the international stage in the arena of attracting russia and the military-political leadership to of responsibility, russia, its current regime, which is at the moment, is not eternal. in my opinion, sooner or later they will be forced to bear responsibility and be forced to answer to the international community for the crimes they commit. well, by the way, an interesting moment and maybe somehow this verdict in the case will affect all the discussions, but whether or not russia should be recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism, so if three citizens can theoretically be recognized as actually involved in terrorist activities, well yes, i believe that the decision and the trial in the case of the 17th are a little different, but still, taking into account the fact that we are currently conducting

criminal proceedings against the political and military leadership of the russian federation, so this is a priority for us as parties to the accusations i actually wanted to ask you how likely it is that the trial, which we have been watching in the netherlands for these few years, will not actually end with a verdict for the bittern and three more defendants, that the trial will move to the next level. when will they be? well let's put it this way, to consider the possibility of bringing to justice the actual military-political leadership of russia well, we have other proceedings uh-uh regarding the military-political leadership and the office is gathering evidence uh-uh indisputable to bring these uh-uh persons to responsibility and we will decide on the case ms-17 - this is a significant

contribution to the proof that it is russia that is carrying out such criminal actions in relation to ukraine, obviously one of the episodes to say that this is a separate proceeding and that it is being investigated, well, another fact that concerns how in this case, all of them are now out of reach of the ukrainian and international investigation, what are the mechanisms for bringing them to justice under these conditions, let's say the court makes a decision, satisfies the request of the prosecutors in the case, makes a decision on their life imprisonment, how to bring them to justice well, we all perfectly understand what is true. as long as they are in russia or in the occupied territory of ukraine, we can't take them. hmmm, they are not within reach and we can't comply with a possible court decision. but

as i said earlier, i believe and i hope that the regime in russia will fall sooner or later and then it will be possible to extradite and really bring these people to justice so that they are behind bars, what is known about where these people are now , the hills of dubinsky plateau and kharchenko - there were various data for these years since the disaster and the investigation. what do you know as of now? well, we are trying to track where they are and this information and in the mass media about the slides, you must have heard that he is currently in the donbass about others, i cannot say at the moment, as far as i know. they are in russia. there were even rumors

that one of the participants in this case, a citizen of ukraine, kharchenko, allegedly even died. however, this was reported by the mass media. can you confirm this information, yes, there were reports in the mass media, but as far as i know, they have been refuted, but by the way, they are really bitter. and he himself stated that he allegedly went to the front of the russian-ukrainian war, meanwhile, there was a message from a representative of bellinketa christogroziva that uh, the statement of the mountain does not correspond to the truth and he is allegedly uh busy somewhere in the rear in the territory of russia, but i also wonder if you know anything about whether he is really in ukraine or not no, well, on this matter, i cannot answer such a question, and for this we need more precise data, which times we do not have, you mentioned in the conversation before the actual start of the recording that you have been engaged in this case

for three years already 19 what for you personally in the investigation of this case was or may be and remains the most difficult m- i guess it's a feeling of responsibility to the injured persons, it is to the parents, to the children who lost their close relatives, women, men, and this is very responsible, and i believe that the prosecution itself and our subsequent actions . we will continue to collect evidence and establish other culprits in this case in this case the sentence we will er hear on november 18 there were also witnesses there were testimonies testimony of witnesses how did you manage er you or your colleagues of yours from the joint investigative group a to get in

touch with these people because, as i understand it , some of them are people who were actually at the time of the missile launch in the temporarily occupied territory of the international investigative group, all possible measures were taken to obtain the testimony of these witnesses and yes, most of them left the occupied territory, testified both in ukraine and in the netherlands, and now you have the opportunity to continue this work of finding witnesses to contact them somehow, even with by those people who remain either in the occupied territory or may have left for russia. yes, we continue to carry out these measures. we continue the investigation and establish additional evidence, but i want to remind you that according to the agreement between ukraine and the netherlands, any procedural actions are procedural the decision must be agreed with the netherlands because they are senior

in this case of volodymyr tsemakh, a representative of the dnr group, whom the ukrainian special services would have detained and then extradited as part of the exchange between ukraine and russia, and this topic of his extradition to russia it is now often a reason for such speculations of manipulations regarding the investigation in the mh17 case and i want to explain whether it is true. i understand that before volodymyr tsemakh was extradited to russia and he had time to testify in this case to you and the dutch side hmm well a little not so er, another criminal proceeding was conducted against him in which he was interrogated er as a suspect and gave a statement there, well, i remember that when there were court hearings in his case after his detention, and he talked about the fact that he allegedly did not see the russian

military in donbas and allegedly did not see such installations as the beech. what do you think about this information that he voiced while any suspect denies the same as russia continues to deny aggression against ukraine deny er, that they have something to do with the delivery of this installation to ukraine and the commission of this crime, and that is why the russian federation is taking all possible er measures to try to refute our indisputable evidence. they shoot films they they give interviews, uh, they do fake mass media in kyiv, which they think refute our evidence, well, in fact, one of such propaganda films in which volodymyr tsemakh took part actually became one of the proofs that he was perfectly informed

about what happened in the summer of 2014 in the donbas, i wanted to ask you about one more person, andrii konavin, a gambling employee who was detained in ukraine in the summer of 2020. he also appeared in the ukrainian media as an alleged witness in the case of the shooting down of flight mh17, what happened to him now, this case is in court specifically regarding him and the actions he committed, of which he is a suspect, and the case is being considered by the court, and he did not give any testimony regarding mh17, but he remains on the territory of ukraine remains on the territory of ukraine russia denies involvement in the downing of boeing in 2014 we have watched over the years as russia changes its version of what actually happened, i wanted to ask you how russia behaved all these years and

continues to behave now, did it try put pressure, for example, on the investigation of this case, for example, on e what the joint investigation team was doing well, yes, i believe that e-e what we already discussed with you is precisely throwing into the mass media e filming of films about the refutation of our evidence introducing a version e-e different that, for example , the installation was in a different place than the one we installed. during the pre-trial investigation, there were also versions that this plane was shot down by another plane, they put forward many versions and carried out, as it were, some studies, then these studies were also published in the mass media, and this is all, i believe, that they tried to influence the opinion of society and the consequences, including

the court. by the way, it is an interesting point that out of the four accused in this case, one is all- after all, i was on it in absentia, and he is a russian citizen, pulatov, who had lawyers at the court in the netherlands. and i saw that some commentators believed that this was exactly the kind of channel through which the russian federation could get access to the materials you also think so, yes, it can only be my assumption, but still, yes, i think that this is an opportunity for russia to get access to materials and somehow influence the court process, the fact that on february 24, the full-scale invasion of russia into ukraine began and somehow affected the course of the investigation, and in general, it is because of your opportunity to further deal with this case and find out the entire chain of culprits involved in this disaster, we have more criminal

proceedings, much more, uh, on the fact of aggression in the russian federation, we have a lot of workload in the investigation of other proceedings . i am the senior of the group of prosecutors in the main proceedings of ukraine. it does not affect in the end, this is perhaps a somewhat philosophical question, meanwhile, this is the episode of the downing of the plane in the sky over the donbass in 2014, it actually appears in various processes, let's say so, not only in courts in the netherlands, and this episode also appears, for example, between the state court and ukraine, the netherlands against russia in the european court of human rights. maybe this is not the end

of the matter . in the death of boeing, almost 300 people will be punished without fail. i am sure that all those guilty will be brought to criminal responsibility, mr. alexander. thank you for this conversation. thank you, despite the constant attacks on kharkiv, high-rise buildings are being restored there. crews are strengthening the structures, inserting windows and repairing the roofs in the houses that are being restored, their residents want to go back. details, what was left, it was sleeping, they celebrated сегодня рождение новый год, see this, a child from kharkiv, alina semenko, shows her apartment, which was completely burned down after being hit by a russian shell, says i took my daughter and mother abroad, she

came back herself and lives in a neighbor's room, i am sending this final sadness, yes. well, life will live on, everything will be fine and kharkiv will be restored, everything will return alyna's cream in this high-rise building on salta, only one family lives these days, repair work started here two weeks ago, says the builder oleksiy bortnikov, the construction is a quarrel, we ground it, then we go upstairs here, by and large , i don't think there is even a little bit of damage here they will start soon, especially the top floor of this house, first of all, the building will be strengthened, then the heating system will be repaired, says the mayor of kharkiv igor terekhov, we are repairing heating systems

water supply er heat supply er and the crimea of ​​this er these are windows because we have to close the circuits so that er it was possible to live in the houses and repair them further on those houses on the high-rise buildings damaged by shelling are examined to understand which of them can be restored and which will endure larisa gumina yuriy lavrynenko kharkiv les kurbas director mykola kulish playwright valerian pidmohylyny writer marko voronyi poet translator mykola zerov poet serhiy

hrushevskyi historian antin krushelnytskyi writer minister of education of the ukrainian people's republic of ukraine from october 27 to 4 in november 1937, in the karelian tract of sandarmokh, the soviet authorities shot 111 people. the crimes of the kremlin. they always say that we can repeat them every morning. when leaving home, all the dispatchers were kissed goodbye by the globes. for the last time in this history, shrapnel hit my stomach, rising to the heart of our today . it is necessary to occupy the defense, bring people to dig in and stand to the death, these are the stories of people who survived the siege, lived under shelling and, despite everything, resisted, which documentary cannot

films about the stories of our days every wednesday at 9:30 p.m. our weapon is the truth marathon the only news sofia's team works with you at the forefront of the information front we talk about the current events of the russian-ukrainian war everything will be ukraine children in the center of events thursday seven in the morning began 267 days of russian- of the ukrainian war to your attention news espresso works in the studio anzhelika sezonenko why did n't the bracket fall in poland russia bears full responsibility for this this position was voiced in