were on board the plane instantly without warning, their lives were cut short cruelly . at that moment, these people were deprived of their lives and their future, the comments of their relatives only confirmed that the victims still had a lot of potential in the future, that they had a long life and these chances for the future was cruelly cut off and it also greatly affected the lives of their relatives. relatives commented on how much their lives had changed after the mh17 plane crash. life

seemed to be divided into two parts before the crash. life after the disaster, the court believes that it is impossible to fully understand what were the emotions of relatives who received the news of the death of their loved ones due to the fall of the h17 plane, the consequences were incredible in some cases people lost children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, brothers, sisters in one life has changed horribly and this situation remains and will remain forever eh the court also does not want to downplay the consequences of this shooting

for the local population in eastern ukraine in some cases eh fragments of the plane and fragments of bodies fell just next to people fell even through the roofs of their houses and it was also an extremely traumatic experience for them so far no one has taken personal responsibility for this tragedy and it has not been explained uh why exactly this uh disaster happened it is very difficult for relatives and this makes the loss even more difficult, and when the defendants realized that it was not a military plane but a civilian one that was shot down, as a

result of which civilians were killed. all three defendants who were found guilty made a decision to relocate as soon as possible setup to hide the consequences of this scandal that this could have been prevented and this behavior of the defendants after the downing of the plane further negatively characterizes the defendants and confirms their guilt; moreover, in its assessment , the court determined that none of the defendants did m-m statements that would explain what happened, but they were expressed outside the courtroom and

they all refused, the brother took responsibility, girkin repeatedly stated that the so-called soldiers of the dnr had nothing to do with the downing of the plane, he also made very negative comments about the passengers of the plane, which can practically be considered humiliating, in addition, they made unfounded comments about the fact that the evidence was falsified, which the court considers unfair, and which does not correspond to the conduct of the investigation by the kharchenko court at all denied

the presence of an installation for launching a rocket book and e and its use, and this position e-e also contradicts the numerous evidence provided by the court, the attitude and position of the accused are assessed by the court as negative and and he considers their comments humiliating to the relatives. therefore, this is also taken into account when the court makes a decision, despite the fact that a

civilian plane was shot down, a military plane was also not a legitimate target in this context, but the court should note that the shooting down of a military plane would have significantly different consequences than the beating of a civilian plane was not worth it, of which there were 298 civilians who had nothing to do with the conflict, at the same time, otherwise, the intention does not diminish the seriousness of the accusation, in the opinion of the court, the consequences of the crimes are so serious, and the positions of the accused is so negative that there cannot be

any mitigating circumstances, however, at the same time, the court considers the specific role of each accused and specifically the position of the accused within the formation of the dpr . girkin was the highest military officer in accordance with international law. as an official in the so-called dpr, he was responsible for his military, it was proven that he approved the use of such air defense systems, dubinsky can be considered a co-organizer and accomplice

who took part in the building and use of weapons, he not only had a high hierarchical position, but he also personally took a significant part in the implementation of this order. kharchenko is involved in the direct execution of the criminal order from dubinsky and, in turn, he also gave orders to his subordinates, therefore, hierarchically, he was at the top of the hierarchical chain, and he is particularly responsible for the movement of the

installation, and accordingly, such responsibility can only lead to a sentence in the form of life imprisonment imprisonment, the court believes that a limited term of imprisonment would not be proportionate. the consequence of this decision regarding the facts , taking into account that girkin was not only the commander, but also was personally in contact with russia and was engaged in

moving the installation to russia, he bears a high responsibility kharchenko, who has in a lower position , he carried out his orders, however, in relation to him, the court also believes that a limited prison term would not be proportionate to the fact that he participated in the movement of the installation and he was personally involved in e-e transportation and the use of e-e of this installation and, in particular, this refers to the fact that it was precisely as a result of his orders that on the same evening the beech installation was discharged from the launch site, accordingly, the court considers that the

accusations are extremely serious, therefore the accused kharchenko should also be imprisoned for life, the court should also consider whether the maximum term of imprisonment for all the accused except the acquitted bulatov was not exceeded, the court considers that the action of the prosecutor's office, which was noted as a violation at the beginning of this meeting, the court should consider

to what extent did these actions affect the accused themselves, to what extent were they affected by the violations of the procedural law of ukraine, they did not explain what kind of damage was caused to them and the level of such damage was not recommended, because with regard to procedural violations, the court believes that if it is about a limited time imprisonment - it would not be proportional to the gravity of the accusations. accordingly, the court believes that the evidence is proven, it has been carried out, and the consequences are so serious, so this announcement of sentences is obviously in

connection with the downing of the mh17 plane in 2014, the court in of gases officially confirmed that the flight mh17 was shot down by a russian-made buk missile that was fired from the temporarily occupied territory of ukraine, while the so-called dnr at that time was controlled by the russian federation , units of the dnr can be considered part of the russian army, the court believes that even if the downing of a passenger of the plane and it was a mistake, this does not absolve the defendants from responsibility , gorka na dubynskyi and kharchenka were found guilty. thank you for being with espresso antin berkovskyi and our colleagues judicial control with tetyana shustrova, we ask you this week in the program judicial control with tetyana shustrova sympathetic judges how

the appeals chamber of the higher anti-corruption court saves high-ranking officials from detention conspiracy treason well solutions or projects investment in a ruin, for which the mayor of bila tserkva will be tried, a million dollars, we were shocked. why did the suspect of corruption, gennady the wild, refuse to pay bail? we stand up for what is right. legal judicial order i congratulate this judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova, the judicial system of ukraine is in a state of complete reboot , the process of formation is extremely difficult, in particular, and because of the ongoing period of full-scale war, the higher judicial bodies, the supreme council of justice and the supreme qualification commission of judges, are being formed virtually from scratch in order to after a long pause, finally get

down to work today we will tell you about one of the candidates for the vrp and her dubious court decisions , due to which she probably won the competition in the end and failed, but first, before the news, the ethical council made a decision on the compliance with the criteria of professional ethics and integrity of the candidates for the position of a member of the vrp from the congress of judges of ukraine, out of 60 applicants who applied for a high position, the council chose 16, they will continue to compete in the competition, among them were the two heroes of our investigations are judges with fortunes of dubious origin and unconvincing reputation, oleksandr sasevich and serhiy burlakov, the rest of the unscrupulous candidates whose judicial biographies we analyzed in the previous programs, the lawsuit of the ex-deputy head of the supreme court was eliminated from the competition, the owners of the

russian passport of bohdan lviv against the supreme court is being considered by the scandalous judge of oask, yevgeny ablov, according to the auto-distribution of cases, ablov was elected on the second attempt. he is known for his scandalous court decisions regarding maidan activists , the so-called avakov backpacks and delaying the case regarding yanukovych's presidency, as well as the ablovier-figure of the wolf films in which they testify to the corruption of vaazk and the state judicial administration we remind you that the holder of a russian passport, bohdan lviv, demands reinstatement as a judge and recovery of his earnings during forced absenteeism in the donetsk region. unknown persons shot and killed the so-called judge of the self-proclaimed supreme court of the dpr oleksandr nikulin. he is in serious condition for the life of a collaborator

. a position at the charged supreme court of the terrorist dpr was appointed from an adviser in september, and in june nikulin was the chairman of the panel of judges which issued death sentences to three foreigners who defended ukraine as part of the armed forces and were captured in mariupol, they were returned during the september exchange of prisoners . the lack of judges will have to appoint approximately half of the entire judicial corps of the current servants of themis.

the heroes of our program will soon undergo a qualification assessment, where their knowledge of the law, the compatibility of their wealth and lifestyle , as well as their decisions will be carefully analyzed by the commission . in august of this year, kalugina overturned the sentence of the judge of the mukachevo city and district court, mykhailo paku, who was sentenced to seven years deprivation of liberty, bribery, the paka case had a great resonance, in particular, due to the fact that the very fact of taking a bribe was recorded on video, and the telephone conversations of the judge confirmed it, so ivan

brought the submission, he says with pleasure because i don’t know there either. they say that you might know at least two or three things dollars bitch fuck another hryvnia fucking undeniable evidence and appeals judge inna kalugina simply did not take them into account then the experts emphasized the decision looked too disproportionate as if the judge deliberately wrote her conclusion in the case like this to release a colleague from punishment here comes a new case and again inna kalugina, now she is saving the mayor of bila tserkva who is accused of embezzlement

for almost 9 million uah. with real estate in bila tserkva in 2018, then the local authorities, headed by dyak, purchased the premises where the center for the provision of administrative services was to be located and tsnap did not work in four years because the building turned out to be a long-term unfinished business , local human rights defenders say that it just alarmed us, knowing this unfinished building that has been there for more than 10 years and there are trees growing on it, and we, well, we know how much it's all already moldy bricks and everything else, every resident of bila tserkva and when we found out that it was a million dollars, we were shocked why the choice of the bila tserkva authorities stopped precisely on the emergency shortage of mining, because there were other options for investment in the city, he told our

to journalists, the public activist oleksandr kolomiets was not the only one, yes, i am deeply convinced that this is a good proposal, and he geographically squeezed the bus and trolley bus junctions there, and it is already completely ready, you just had to bring the furniture there, and it was already working, of course, one gets the impression that this is a conspiracy, a conspiracy for the sake of, well, solving someone's problem. yes, they are coming. mayor hennadiy dykiy personally registered the draft decision to purchase the building for uah 24 million at that time - it significantly exceeded the price offers, this is very fast its purchase took place, as a rule, there are discussions first, it had to go through recessive

commissions, it was all necessary to investigate and investigate this very building, purchases for a million dollars are not made, decisions are not made in 10 days, and that's how you know, there is a narrow circle, that is, half a city is not right and here and even hennadiy, who is right, the locals say that the deputies were actually misled, the deception was visible on the first day, which means that only one commission was held, which means that the mayor was absent, there was no quorum and they could not hold but it was held, uh, no one voted, but they put it before the fact. in this way, the decision was voted by activists who carefully followed the procedure of acquiring the scandalous unfinished building until the end, tried to open the eyes of the authorities, wrote

an appeal to the city mayor, here it is, added all appendices and the protocol and conclusion of the expert panel commissions, all our documents, copies of the contract, what was the price before that, copies of comparative tables for the draft decision, information from the state register, he had all the reasons in order to react, impose a veto, but the wild man was adamant on the threshold that the purchase was legal and uah 24 million ended up in private hands, so local human rights defenders complained about such actions of the authorities to the national anti-corruption bureau, because it was not only a violation of the purchase procedure, as it turned out, the real set the cost of the unfinished building at 24, but only 19 million hryvnias, it was at this

price that the owners put it up for sale, however, when evaluating the real estate, the experts of such an llc, the ukrainian expertise center, deliberately overestimated the value and they falsified the report, the investigation began, but the case did not move for a long time, a lot of statements were submitted about schemes and about some withdrawals of budget funds and money laundering . ties and, well, most of all, it all crumbles, however, after 4 years, those involved in the arrangement still received suspicions of committing a crime , according to the investigation, the amount of losses to the local budget from the purchase of the building under the tsnap is almost 9 million uah, according to the version of the pre-trial investigation body

while holding the position of bilotserkiv city mayor, gennadiy dyky, acting deliberately against the interests of the territorial community, used the official position of the city mayor in order to obtain an illegal benefit by purchasing an unfinished construction object in communal property at a known inflated cost, which caused serious consequences in the form of losses to the territorial community's budget september 23, 2022 year, within the framework of the mentioned criminal proceedings, the wild man was informed about the suspicion of committing criminal offenses the appraiser also received a notice of suspicion as well as the sellers of the building to citizens pavlo khodakivskyi and nataliya sokyrko, who are now allegedly hiding and therefore received a notice in absentia to gennadiy

dykom of the higher anti-corruption court. the preventive measure did not satisfy the prosecutor, the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office insisted on a stricter western bail in the amount of damages of almost uah 9 million, the prosecutor filed a complaint with of the appeals chamber of the higher anti-corruption court, substantiating the requirements of the appeal, the prosecutor refers to the fact that the investigating judge, while considering the petition, took into account circumstances not provided for by the code of criminal procedure of ukraine, as a result of which he came to erroneous conclusions about the need to apply a preventive measure to the suspect in the form of personal bail , however, the prosecutor was refused in the appeals chamber and the complaint was left unsatisfied the decision was made by a panel of judges headed by inna kalugina, while,

as we already know, the circumstances were taken into account not foreseen by the criminal procedure code, similar to gennady the wild fertilizer possesses the skill of persuasion, semi-destroyed unfinished building, he managed to push a large construction project into the president's program, and in order for tsnap to finally work, another 100 million hryvnias should be spent. provision of administrative services, but unfortunately this year a full-scale armed aggression broke the plans ukraine will definitely win we will make a cool a modern center for the provision of administrative services, it will be a decoration of our city, and we defend our rightness in a legal court order, despite everything , the mayor of bila

tserkva, who is confident in his rightness to pay the bail, for some reason was afraid of this money, which at the current exchange rate amounts to some 200 thousand dollars for a wild, far from poor person at once returned after the removal of the preventive measure and only on the condition that he fairly performed the duties assigned to him, maybe this is the problem, they called the suspected mayor to find out these individual circumstances due to which the court did not support the request of the prosecutor hello, i congratulate you, mr. gennadiy, this is a program of judicial control, we have a few questions for you. well, how will i talk to you when you come? i will give you your phone number, they will call you, make an agreement if you are interested in these questions, why did they make

a deposit in the amount of the damages if they are sure that they are right ? the court, headed by inna kalugina, gennady wild , will not have to think about bail and this year, judge inna kalugina tried to become a member of the high council of justice and did not pass the competition, we do not know for sure the reasons, however, we can assume that the issues of the uetic council were also related to the questionable property of the judge and to her integrity , in general, during her career as a judge, inna kaluginia managed to save a lot, she assures that her mother helped her in this, so in 2019, the judge declared that her mother had 20,000 us dollars and one hundred thousand hryvnias in cash could have been more, but two years

before that she gave her daughter 80,000 hryvnias, in 2019 the mother lent another 528,000 hryvnias to kalugina and it would be nothing if her official income for the past 17 years did not amount to 3,000,107 hryvnias, and as soon as the parents of judges manage to do this a house in melitopol of almost 230 square meters, as inna kalugina assures, was also built with her mother's funds, she received the ownership right to the plot under it, as well as to the construction itself, based on the decision of the melitopol city district court in 2011, in which, surprisingly by coincidence, at that time she was working as a judge and kalukhina, in general, kalugina's entire career is accompanied by strange judicial