can't nato make a willful decision to shoot down missiles flying west to west in order to protect poland at that time - here i am, my answer, ms. natalya, is very simple and beautiful, it cannot make a willful legal decision, it can make a willful decision, i want it, putin can, but putin can, but at the end of the institution, no one can say. come on, it will be a meeting of ambassadors at the level of the heads of state. can he create a security system? look at the candidacy of ukraine in the european community, this was a voluntary decision, but not what they said. come in, we are opening the door, come in, you

have to do this and that for that, then you will remain a candidate. which ukrainian society will not like, as all countries did not like the candidate, but they all went to this one with gritted teeth because they understood that they had no alternative. part of european civilization push your ambitions too far and everyone here does not like it oh we will be the most independent the most influential no we will just be poor where is the urbanized depopulated industrialized country that should become a country with a large population with a large industry and with large cities so that everything it happened, we must clearly forget about the fact that we were soviet people with archaic talentless values ​​yes yes and we have it no it did not happen it was not easy and we have so much time but we all

let's talk, john gerb, director of the eurasia center, atlantic council, the us ambassador to ukraine, from the third to the sixth year, we will speak russian. i think john knows ukrainian, but he knows russian better. birds in riga, after which, by the way, the director of the central office rassvet flew to kiev. obvious security problems, if the director is in a bomb shelter, he wo n't go to kyiv just like that, so he had to discuss it with our president, it's very important, something very important. the details of these negotiations are what they mean. the press that the old people just discussed a nuclear nuclear strike or that you were still on your side what was in grief yes what was good in ankara exactly the question was not

necessary i was talking for so long i just know that they are sobchat let them go well i understood why people still so that it is quite possible that the bronzes and nareshken of gavrila and somehow the baptism of this war and the termination of the russian game with and against ukraine, but we do not know this and i am not speaking, so it happened with each other and such a conversation, but i can explain this to people even without such an option because the er bronze in the region is all with its opponent from moscow, and i am definitely you sveta raises questions in kiev, i mean

that we provide help to ukraine, romania, because my series what ukraine won in this war has meaning for the director of sru from turks to come kiev to talk about his conversation, the screenwriter, therefore, this can be explained to me. the visit, but i do not rule out another possibility, although i am not saying that such an opportunity is actually what happened. well, it is very difficult for my ambassador to imagine that naryshkenbro is sitting in turkey, they say well, conditionally for 3 hours and they never remembered ukraine and the war, only a nuclear strike, all

they talked about was how many nuclear strikes you have. russian aggression in ukraine is the main question in our honore. well, there are other important questions too , questions that are written, for example, this contract is the start and the destruction of the ipad. i was a diplomat for 31 hours. and the course is externally the political course of the biden administration and i can again widget - such a session between

the bronze and the final in which they do not pay much attention or even any attention to the war that is now happening in ukraine well, i i have to add here that if the bride was bronzed and our decision was even used to use a weapon of mass destruction of the russians in the ukrainian war, then this is also the case of this war, we are with you , the ambassador. it seems to me that the most important question is there. in the american establishment, russia is a big problem. and it might make sense

to think about what to do with russia in an hour, in two, in three, in five, to understand that this problem will not end with the end of the war , no matter what ukraine's war with russia is over, but russia is a world problem, the russian question, or the kremlin's threat today, it's an acrobatic threat , i expect a ukrainian victory in the end and in this war, and it will be a blow to the pocket, it's a general kremlin threat, and probably such a threat cannot remain defeats of russia in ukraine but you

are right that even after this simple question it will certainly be important and i know what people there think, well, in my opinion, it is more important that we pay attention to our attempt to defeat tell general milli, the chairman of the day-to-day committee of the chief of staff of the us armed forces, not for the first time, and at the same time, the presence of the us defense minister indicates that the military solution of the ukrainian russian war is the complete liberation of the russian territory of ukraine captured by russia. decisions to

what extent is this the personal opinion of the general, or is it not some kind of signal from moscow and kiev that is discussed in washington that is discussed with the administration what is the opinion of the president of the united states? i have to admit that i don't quite understand why he is saying that, but i had the opportunity to talk with my colleagues, taylor and steve, for a few hours in june, and i know that in general he thinks that america should send more advanced weapons to ukraine, which the administration is not yet ready to hand over. and that is why his statement in this week was given to you, and i was surprised, and i am

sure that you know that he spoke twice on sunday, jason, and he said that we are not we see america, we do not see this moment as a good moment for negotiations, because russia still has the intention of power in ukraine, so listen to me, they

understand. vystuap like this or how ego a-a bumps want but if it's true then it's a game how yavella and well and just oh for sure it 's better to just say that i understood why that 's how and vystuap until it's not politics it's not and the position of the administration and thank god because when solomen said that this is not the moment, but i negotiated with russia for another hour to take control of ukraine, the shoes and when, at all, can there even be a moment for negotiations, here the press secretary of the president of russia is saying that in fact we destroy their infrastructure so that they go to negotiations. in fact, if it generalizes, but when they destroy the infrastructure, they go to negotiations, it means that negotiations are waiting for capitulation .

infrastructure and this, in my opinion, and this will be explained. why did salo speak in an antarka that while moscow is interested in the present world, they will not cook in ukraine, and the time for negotiations will come when the kremlin’s cone is resolved. that is that such a dictation is simply impossible, then russia will be ready but to negotiate a lasting peace and not a military peace, a military game, thank you

, thank you mr. ambassador john herobs, director of the eurasia center of the atlantic council, former ambassador of the united states to ukraine and a friend of ukraine thank you very much. all the best, mr. john, thank you. goodbye. well, let's continue our efforts to answer all the questions. once again, it is simple to understand that putin and probably all his entourage are people who have read few books, do not know history, do not know philosophy, do not know military science, and so on. there were no cases in the stories are recent, that is, the second world war, if these massive bombings would have led to anything,

first of all, by the way, there were already bombings, but there was london and all of britain was dresden and half of germany was tokyo, which were practically destroyed, so uh, about uh, tokyo and dreiser there was simply nothing left, london remained, but it was very scary, and in hitler's germany and in democratic britain and in the ukrainian village of the soviet union and in imperial japan, it did not lead to anything. bonfires and we will sit and cook on bonfires, imagine what will happen tomorrow, the people of kyiv, the people of lviv, the people of kharkiv, who survived all this, i mean the people of kharkiv, will come and say let's surrender let's

end the war we lost we went to surrender to the russians, well, it's not even surprising what he read and didn't read, he was born in leningrad now. by the way, this is a blockaded city. people there did not even think about the fact that they should let the hitlerites in. they had their own problems. however you like but at the same time they believed that it was impossible that they could not surrender to the enemy although many of these people did not like the communists and were not in solidarity with the soviet government, but it was a completely different situation in politics by the way, absolutely right in italy the purges that stalin's forces fell on leningrad, they were one of the strongest, they mowed down everyone, but the invader came and despite the fact that literally the day before yesterday leningrad was shot en masse - it was you who said no, no, we will not let hitler, well, this

is the effect of war, and that's why it really is. i'm not very i understand what the idea is. when he tells you that we will fire at you so that you surrender, i apologize in order for ukraine to capitulate and capitulate , it is necessary to destroy its army. during the second world war, these countries were hermetically sealed, which were bombed and destroyed. it was impossible to get anywhere from germany. it was closed. they did not let anyone into the soviet union. i could especially go. yes, japan is the same. the fact that the country is open, with open borders in the west, people can leave, people can bring something, generators, some small towns, all this, and a big route of humanitarian aid. people

from the east can go to the center from the center on west in west, receiving all these cargoes from other countries , leaving, that is, reducing the load on the energy sector, and it is much more difficult to do everything than when the country is airtight, so i really mean nothing but sadism, this is so sadistic pleasure, but i'll tell you, i see the logic in this sadistic pleasure, i don't know if you do, i believe that this is not the logic of a real war, but of the fact that putin is considered a civil war, his serfs do not listen to us, the court, yes, he does not even want to win by such an act, he wants to punish is just this punishment, they are wrong russians, we will now simply deprive them of normal conditions for life because only correct russians should live well and we are wrong, and that's why i didn't literally go to work this morning with the people's money, i thought about it

our accent is zhlobsky, that's ukrainian accent in russian, that's if you're estonian, you have such a thin, beautiful baltic accent, i respect it, and georgian is funny. and here it is. oh, what kind of ass is it? that's why it's mensheva, we're less, we're such non-dorozians, and here these non-russians allow themselves russians well, they don't understand, listen to what they say, it was necessary to pretend that way because we are so weak, we russians, well , it's not surprising that they are like that, and that's why it's all for us, we need to understand that therefore, we wouldn't leave anyone alive until this someone said, i'm russian, oh, okay, little russian well

такой чудесный русский как бы бралан i какой какой гамно этот shevchenko oh guns i can't i can't say luhansk yes yes speak luhansk i will stand i will stand in front of the mirror lukas oh oh oh but it's somehow beautiful yes yes yes yes yes according to our - russian, yes, the british prime minister sunak said on exactly those 27, there is something mathematical. you yourself understand. yes, you can't throw russia out of the g-20 because it seems that this is a wider group of countries that works according to the principle of consensus. i don't know, i can only say that this is not a group of democratic countries for sure there are far from democratic countries and that is why to find this consensus there, again using the word as it is, this is a group of democratic

countries where elections are regularly held, they are competitive, there is an opposition, there is respect for human rights, private property, and so on, he said so you have a broad group of countries that works according to the principle of consensus, a consensus regarding the exclusion of russia from the group of 20 cannot be found because half of the countries of the group of 20 are there. i want russia to be half there, and this is also what ukrainians should ultimately understand the population of the earth does not support ukraine in this war because they are more neutral , even though it was already a victory, because more than half of the population of the earth does not live. there are billions in addition to silver and bronze, and these people do not live in a democratic world for them. putin, who is fighting with ukraine today, is a hero who is fighting with the west, and of course, if he

destroyed ukraine, they would all heave a sigh of relief that the west lost because then all the african, asian, latin american otaki dictatorships, oh look, the dictatorship is cool, it defeated democracy, so dictatorships have a future, so let’s go venezuela and then north korea and then iran and many more african countries and i would continue to build them anti-democratic regimes and all of china, let's not say that this is a kind of democracy in the western sense. india seems to be the largest democracy in the world, but it is also so peculiar. this week, the prime minister of canada just publicly criticized the prime minister of canada. i will tell you why the journalists found out what we said. i'm curious. he says how and why. because we're a democratic country, we're not china. we have no options to say. you're here to

hide. well, about that, about what we talked about today. people live in different worlds. yes, and, and no. do they really understand reality? listen, well, the cat, russia, putin, chinese leaders, north korean leaders . they don't understand how it is possible to call a press conference of everyone, without exception, not prepared in advance, but everyone without exception came and asked. now we see that putin is refusing some the next new year's press conference there, precisely because what if he suddenly gets there alone? no , they didn't even prove that no one can get there, but the very fact that he won't be there is a question for the authorities, often with kherson. well, yes, why are there nazis there were nazis to do, and if all these questions will not be there, and today you looked at how well you slept today, yes, yes, yes, and how do you like the weather, and

the economy is growing simply? you can't ask about kherson oh, there is a lot of money, please show me , poor poor putin, and they were happy that he was sitting at a wonderful press conference, oh, ask me, i’m crazy, oh, vadim valerchenko, masha son of the hole masha, ask me , please, tell me why we don’t have a christmas tree on the central street of the city , why and anu's plane immediately takes him now, why will there be a christmas tree with us writing about the possible sudden fall of putin's regime. how do you evaluate such assumptions, will the system change then, because putin is not the only one there, i would say so a special moment, i say yes, everything is possible, we can see the prerequisites, but

there is a very long distance from the prerequisites to the fact. i always give a very simple example that this is the situation right now. and will cross the dog from which mrs. hanna anna petrovna came out, she walks every day and every day the dog breaks away and also walks somewhere, and here every time 10 km from the motorcade, just skip it, no , but i say that we simply do not imagine the world gives there are so many examples of so-called accidental cases that the dog may change dogs, that motorcade may have moved 20 pieces every day, but there comes a moment when this one herself oh you bitch, you killed our beloved anna petrovna dog and then it will be a disaster, that is, everything is possible now, really at the

top they can, how did great lenin learn, the bottoms, we will not say that they don’t want. they don’t want. they know what, yes . they already have doubts, but they won’t say that they are, and the top ones are obviously no longer controlled. it’s like it was a year ago. the russian federation is a system forming an organization for russia and the question is not putin's. the question is that this organization has proven its inability to manage the country. the organization is not putin's because all these people, yes, all these people. we are absolutely idiots, that's what is the problem of idiots , their perception of the world, they had everything in the world, economy, oil, gas, money, cooperation with the west, huge opportunities, they suddenly decided that they should fight, it is not clear for what for several hundreds of kilometers of someone else's territory simply because they consider it their own, it was written in

illina's book, and this suggests that they are simply idiots, this is a conspiracy. they actually lived for 10 years, stealing, filling their pockets, and accordingly resting on the southern coast of france, and everything would be wonderful no, it didn't mean that this means in principle that there is a regime that can only be devalued by the federal security service of the russian federation . is there now an alternative to the russian fsb regime? the state security committee of the soviet union appeared, which put an end to the caper regime using internal difficulties, if such forces appear that will be able to challenge the fsb or within the fsb, it is also possible that some liberal so-called group there is called the foreign intelligence service, something like that when he said at the meeting of the security council i'm in favor of

joining, yes, that's all. more to talk. yes, so there is a foreign intelligence service - it is true , there is an army that has always been on the run, even if it is a bone , but now thanks to the war, they can decide that they have a simple choice, either a military coup or the approach of the moment under the knife, this is absolutely vitaly pravyi, what is accumulating now the number of crises, and it may not be just a crisis, but a life crisis, either mine or not. and when it will suddenly start, we do not know. this does not mean that we know, but we can assume to imagine that if 25 generals find out that tomorrow they will have kharakiri, then they say listen, maybe

no, we don't have to obey, that's not why they'll do it because they do n't like putin more. again, they can and do relegation and can honestly say that putin is bad. it is our job to fight the political situation, and you should understand who is popular in ukraine, who directs what, you are not working, and that is why at this moment the people are silent. it is obvious that the elites can do something , when, how, that is why there is a revolutionary situation in one the centers of the upper powers they are definitely not counter-, well, they don’t understand how in the new situation, well, they want more for it , they still want more fingers. so they crossed out and say oh damn, that would be sejach. they all say two or three more

months how before and how before that's how to the house until march ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot ot as before and we wish you all have a good, quiet night, for example, every week the saturday political club helps to understand the processes taking place in ukraine and the world vitaly portnikov, host of espresso and invitation experts

based on facts give their assessment and forecast of the development of events, you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, see the saturday political club that saturdays are not espresso i'm iryna koval, mother, wife, host of the espresso tv channel. and i'm also a volunteer. our soldiers at the front need a lot of things every day, and that's why part of my life is today - this help to the armed forces of ukraine and i am very grateful to my colleagues for supporting me in this thanks to our soldiers i can distract myself from the continuous flow of news for at least a short time to admire nature while walking with simba in the park i see beauty in such simple things i know that my family is behind the backs of the fantastic