the president, that is, the prime minister, and the commander-in-chief , he wants to solve the political career of ivan during his term by a-a means, and that issue will be very huge . a big question and now the superiority of forces, in particular sea forces, is not on the side of america, that is, the region. thank you very much, let's put an end to our conversation. on direct communication, we will now have a short pause, after which mr. vitaly portnikov will

comment on the most important events of this week. my rheumatism pain relieves pain reduces swelling and improves joint mobility in my wrists and back here but we are canceling this ad we just want to give you up to 50% off on megogo so you can afford it sometimes relax with free choices and discounts to choose from, choose what you want on megogo events, the most important events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives, of course, the news feed reports about them, but not enough to know what is happening, you need to understand antin borkovsky and invitations, experts soberly assess the events, analyze them modeling our immediate future every

saturday at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10 p.m. studio event with anton borkovskii naispresso let's see how people living with rheumatism and arthrosis live the weather is changing, yes, i smeared dolgit in the morning. now let the dolgit cream relieve pain, reduce swelling and improve the mobility of the joints, because the joints are already broken. the only yellow cream for pain in the joints and back buy with a 15% discount dolgit cream 100 g in pharmacies, amc pharmacy, penny pharmacy and pharmacy shar, we continue the program for saturday 's poliklubzhelika seasons and vitaliy portnikov, therefore, we start with the first topic, the new elected

, newly appointed, or rather, the prime minister of great britain. by the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, he announced that britain would strengthen our anti-aircraft defense by 50 million pounds. vitaly had certain fears before the appointment of a decision maker that britain might somehow change its policy towards ukraine and deal with some internal affairs, but i understand this visit means that after all, we are on the agenda. i think that in general i had no personal fears, because we simply have such a tendency to personalize politics, and politics in the civilized world in the democratic world is determined by the mood of society and the political course of the parties, the change of the ruling party in great britain did not take place, and god johnson and the forest trance , who was johnson's minister of foreign affairs and then the prime minister of great britain, and rishi solex are representatives of the same of a political team, of course, they may

have conflicts, disagreements, the struggle for leadership, there is logic in this when there is no struggle for leadership, there is no democracy, but the pike perch decision is simply when they hurt. johnson was the prime minister, he was the state treasurer, the minister of finance, the chancellor. in fact, it is called great britain . foreign policy or some issues related to the war, for this there is the prime minister, the minister of defense, the minister of foreign affairs. well, this is the division of responsibilities, but let's say it hurts the debate between the strass and the gallows regarding what they will be to make disagreements in the position of the prime minister of great britain about what they will do in the matter of russia's war with ukraine, there was no one, there were other members, what was one economic program in the

taras forest, it is completely different, they offered other programs, but here they were absolutely unified and it was a decision from the fc, the program of the cabinet, because in great britain it is the cabinet that decides such issues. and if the prime minister does not have support in the cabinet , a crisis begins on such issues, the minister resigns, where the prime minister resigns, but here there was nothing similar about these issues. that is, it was clear that this is a joint position, of course we want politics to be personalized again and i decide that sonak does not look as bright as boris johnson . you know the rain, i mean politically speaking and in principle the results of boris johnson's rule were shown in the weeks spent in the river directly by the minister of great britain in a deep economic crisis, well, this is a real result of how boris johnson

fulfilled his duties as the prime minister of great britain, it is catastrophic from the point of view of domestic politics, any briton says it just now, it is a disaster, in other words, there is no, but from the point of view of foreign policy, jones was at the top because he is a person who turned out to be incapable of realizing internal political risks, i would be a supporter of the completely delusional theory that if great britain leaves the european union, there will be happiness here, along with this, i am a democrat by conviction, i am absolutely clearly aware. i would say these are the main priorities of british foreign policy, kolomova is talking about the opposition of democracy to dictatorships. this is very important and this mistake is now very expensive . of people,

trust is very important, and here is another bag that i don't think he will be lucky with the position of prime minister of great britain, because i generally believe that all people who are in favor of the continuation the idea of ​​separating great britain from the european union will not end very well, but regarding the fact that ukraine should be helped. well, he continued to say this when the minister from tavriy said before his first visits . well, not with such speeches , not so vividly, because for jones, the ukrainian issue was still a matter of gaining power, because he, in principle, at the beginning of the war, the chair was already swaying under him, he was accused quite seriously in a lie and he needed to show that he should stay now not because he is so good but our situation is so bad, well the fact is a bad situation but he is beautiful to use because

he is a talented beach boy, a more talented pr guy than a politician and it is just natural in him this is what he always did when he was the mayor of london or the foreign minister of great britain, he succeeds in it, and now he does not need to use the ukrainian theme specifically, because in order to get it in office, he needs to decide i would say such problems of the british economy, but this does not mean that he will change the policy even one iota in this regard. thank you. i suggest moving on to the next topic. after all, we have little time and a lot of interesting topics to discuss, and the intelligence officer, er, the american heads met the development of both american and russian burns and naryshkin say to vitaliy that well, we don’t know publicly, so in the public space what exactly they talked about, but they say that the purpose of the meetings was

not about the uh nuclear threat talk a perhaps some kind of probing by the united states of america. and the question of moscow regarding the negotiations with kyiv, perhaps what are their moods? what do you think? i think that the americans, in principle, are now interested in discussing various confidential issues with people from the closest circle of vladimir putin , because jake sullivan spoke with mykola patrosh, secretary of the security council of the russian federation, with yuriy ushakov, advisor to the president of russia on foreign policy, and now, mr. williams spoke with sergiyechuk, it is necessary immediately to say that patrushev tracks are quite different people because patrushev is a person from internal intelligence on ryshkin - he is a person with external atroshev always gravitated to the control of domestic politics and never particularly wanted

to engage in foreign policy as such if you read what patrushek says about external politics it just doesn't go to his head. he lives in a world you know, grandma, the entrance is only moskovsk, who are sitting there talking to each other like krepziloids. the illuminati have seized control of the earth. patushok literally says this during his interviews narichka is a completely different character narichkin always wanted to use his role as an illegal spy in order to be in the public plane to talk to the west, well, he just belongs to an aristocratic family, he is perceived that way because he knows that king he is was the chairman of the state duma of the russian federation and he has a completely different view of his role in politics. thus , of course, when he talks to the director of the central intelligence agency, it is to a certain extent

measure corresponds to his idea of ​​what he, as a member of the security council of the russian federation and as the head of foreign intelligence, should do, and he has influence in the russian federation himself, and finally, access to putin's body. access to this, such a position is always entrusted to those people who, in principle, putin can trust absolutely, but naryzhka's predecessor in the position of head of the foreign intelligence service was the former prime minister of russia mykhailo fartko. well, when the head of the government is appointed the head of the foreign intelligence service, well, this is the first gogol, with whom is actually the head of the government , that is, secondly, what is absolutely trust, then in this service itself - this must also be understood, it is in its current form as a separate organization , it was not founded by yevgeny who was also the minister of foreign affairs, the prime minister of the russian federation, but he is a professional external

development and people from the kgb, such as putin, they treat this intelligence with a certain priority. they themselves did not rush anywhere further, but here there is an understanding of the enemy's larger volume and its real capabilities, and i think that birds is trying to use this very situation and possibly improve what sullivan definitely cannot solve with patrus because sleeping that is a rather harsh conversation here we offer it, you plan it with ryzhkas, you can talk analytically well, he is capable of analyzing the situation absolutely, i remember it for sure from the time of his speakership, but again, the bios is interested in the first thing - this is true. i am sure that about they talked about nuclear weapons, and there may be, again , not a question of such tough demands, what

kind of saliva they put on the patrol, but simply an attempt to explain what the real consequences of the far-reaching analytical plan might be in order to finally be convinced that such actions are disadvantageous for the russian federation, that they they will not give her anything and will only make the situation worse. secondly, i am also very important for the americans. and what can, in principle, be voiced by the directorate of the detailed intelligence management is the release of american citizens from russian of prisons, especially of this famous basketball player , this is a fundamental task for president biden. he was even ready to talk to president putin himself about this release, as you know, he said that if he ever talks to president putin, particularly during the twenties, then it is about the release of the american region, which means that it is also quite an important task and it is also clear that if someone discusses it on the ryzhkina bios thirdly, it is also very important, it is a war, they could talk

about the war superficially, so to speak, but in any in this case, try to understand each other's positions, what russia is ready to do now, what it can do in the event of such an option, because it is the variability of approaches that is very important between people who deal with external developments. well , you will win there. and what will you do next? you lost, what will you do next? what can we offer you so that this loss does not become a catastrophe for you, with which you wanted to get out of the political consequences? and what do you think if you win someone else's ukrainian territory there calculate after such a victory, what are you even thinking of doing if synonyms no one will agree with your role in such as in the status of the occupiers of ukraine, well, that is, there is a lot to discuss here, the task at hand is to summarize all this and

write a report note to putin about the mood in the american style i think that he did it a long time ago, putin - i read it a long time ago and will take it into account, but that's it. that's all, in principle, it also applies in this context if they talked about the negotiations between moscow and kyiv recently there was information from the walking that allegedly the national security advisor of the united states already ixalivan directed with volodymyr zelenskyi and pressured him to have kyiv look for realistic demands in negotiations with the kremlin, and the american side still officially denies such pressure, but how do you think it is possible now? i think that jake sally is great, any other american official would like kyiv to demonstrate the will to solve problems politically, because if this will is not demonstrated, it makes the task easier for those who speak , we help mine and we only

continue the war with our help, because otherwise they would have agreed long ago on some conditions that suit both sides, and so ukraine will fight russia will fight there will be no end in sight the question is that from what what volodymyr zelensky says about the negotiations, what he doesn't say, nothing changes. it seems to me that today this week has become absolutely indicative of how russia really sees victory. that's when the press secretary of the president of the russian federation dmytro piskov said well, yes we are destroying this infrastructure of theirs to encourage them to win, but it is quite simply deciphered that we are forcing them to surrender, because what are these negotiations if we destroy your infrastructure, so we have to stop the destruction of our infrastructure, and how to propose that you withdraw your troops from the ukrainian territories to suggest that you do not dictate to us, er, which unions we should join, which path of development to choose. well, i 'm sorry if there is such a situation. it means that the

opposite country is weakened and it is forced to ask for such a peace. and if the country is in you come to the negotiations, otherwise we will destroy everything here and you will simply all die, this is the position of power, you come, i will tell you the russian status of the ukrainian territories that we occupied, demilitarization, denazification, everything else according to the text, the tasks of special operations have not been fulfilled and they must be fulfilled either by military means i.e. obtaining all these results on the transformation of ukraine into a viable organism or negotiations through political means. when ukraine itself agrees to this, there will be nothing more in the negotiations. this must be understood by all citizens of ukraine, the war between russia and ukraine will never end with victory. it can end only in one raid, as a result of the exhaustion of the efforts of one side or both sides, and the side that will exhaust itself and accept all the conditions that will offer it, and the side

that will not exhaust themselves, whatever these conditions were not unpleasant for the other side, this is how such wars look, and the only thing that can happen is that there may be no negotiations at all, simply de facto on some line when it becomes clear that the parties have lost resources human technical, etc. and that they are simply completely exhausted, they simply stop fighting until the moment when the culprits gather their strength and i will get hold of this smartphone again, this is a freezing of the conflict for a certain time without an agreement. that negotiations with russia will lead to nothing, because before the full-scale war, he was still looking for ways to negotiate with the russian federation, but now he specifically says that no agreement will be possible until they will not fulfill a number of our demands, i am not an excuse for volodymyr zelenskyi or the opposition on this issue. i never supported it in the period 2019-2020. i said that it would not lead to anything. in fact,

i have to say that it was such a public request, which to a certain extent reflected everything in the results presidential elections in 2019 because, for some reason that is still unclear to me, even after 2014, the majority of ukrainians did not want to understand what was happening to them in general, what was waiting for them, and what putin needed, and i remember all these conversations absolutely i would say i well idiotic but let's give crimea to him and he will get rid of us first of all what does it mean we will give it to him he has already taken it from you he doesn't expect you to give him something second moment and let's us donbas he knows let's give donbass and he will get rid of us, and how much more do you want to give him and the most important thing is that you can give him anything, but if he needs something else, if he needs everything, you want it all the

time, so you are dealing with a maniac who wants to kill you and you all the time says and you can cut it off finger well, maybe another finger well, maybe i'm ready cut off my palm anyway i don't need it and she didn't love me very much at all when i spoke ukrainian cut it off come on do n't need your palm i don't need your palm let him have your palm after i've passed he's not going to do it conventionally speaking member is a waste, he needs to kill you in general, but the vast majority of ukrainians did not understand this, that it was not there in 1991 , if they could understand that it was not there in the time of yanukovych, when there were already all these foreign policy the goals were essentially declared by the russians. i could still understand, but when this was not the case after 2014 for the

vast majority of people, when many people voted after the attack on the crimean donbas , zaporozhian parties, when the continuation of the war was blamed on the ukrainian leadership, you will remember that the war does not end because it is beneficial to the ukrainian leadership they are simply called tools, but they can be changed to honest people who will not earn money for people. well, what about putin, who will fight with us, of course not, because it is not necessary, and this it was simply madness and i call it this type of thinking, i would say thinking at the level of national suicide, that is just a people who want to destroy themselves. but fortunately, enlightenment to a certain extent, i do not think that everyone wants it. many people are still in this state. but they are just silent. ugh, they are just afraid to say it, but i already hear it from time to time. it's not fashionable anymore, it's not fashionable, but i want

to. to negotiate with the neighbors, there will be millions of them and this will be a huge problem for the future of ukraine, but it will be later in order to see these people in all their madness, it is necessary to win the grandchildren first, but if it drags on like this , those who were there during the 14- 19, well , even in the 22nd year, i was tired of war, although these people did not even know what war was. well, i think that now everyone knows what war is, it is already in every corner of ukraine and even those regions that are not located somewhere literally on the sharp these military actions, as, say, kharkiv region, they are constantly shelling sumshchyna, dnipropetrovsk region, yes, but all other regions are also subjected to rocket attacks, the light goes out in them, they have a difficult winter. and this should be understood by every ukrainian, either we are them or they are us, there is no other ukrainian people in

history anymore he will never be able to fend off russia or its existence as a nation, we are not talking about the ukrainian state, even for the polish state, the question is not that the ukrainian state can be lost, the question is that the ukrainian state the people have every chance to end their existence on their ethnic lands, in case of losing this war, there will be some russians left here because the occupier will clearly say you want to live here well, say you are russians, tell tsar putin, who said that the ukrainian people do not exist, that you are russians and the ukrainians - this is an austrian fiction, and who does not think so, please isolation, filtration, where is urbanization, denazification, they all have terms that justify their clear decision to expel and destroy all those who consider themselves ukrainians, and let them there will be no illusions that a

compromise can be reached on this issue. russia sincerely considers the entire territory from uzhhorod to yalta to be the territory of historical russia. it wants to return this territory to itself, not as someone else's, but as its own, but the ukrainian people, who believe that ukraine is not russia, simply consider the occupiers of this russian territory to be it is worse for the ukrainian people if they settled on russian land, russians should live here. you are russians. live, vote for a united russia, support all this madness, the fight against the west, by the way, it is not only our problem, it is the same problem angelika, what of these people who tried for centuries, probably starting with peter the great, linguistically speaking, to europeanize russia, you talk a lot, let's cancel russian culture, but they themselves canceled it, or she canceled it herself, all these people who are interesting from the point of view of the

russian culture of the people are not in russian, conventionally speaking, the people of the civilized, civilized world, they have europeanized russia. practically everyone and who we like and who we don't like and tolstoy and dostoyevsky and rachmaninov and tchaikovsky shestakovich this is all european russia where oh why the west loves dostoevsky so much because the tears of a child are the main thing, this is the main meaning, ask any westerner there, intellectuals, why does he read guestevsky, because the tears of a child are valuable, and here come people who do not mean that these tears hint at the child, they simply shoot these children it is definitely not what comrade dataevsky wrote about, nothing in this world is worth the tears of a child, chekhov

, you have to squeeze yourself out of a slave drop by drop, but you don't have to squeeze out, you have to pout in front of the tsar volodymyr volodymyrovich that is to say, it is simple this class of people is very, very much, i would say, a european country, an eastern european orthodox country, but a european country with a deep medieval asian country, which even turned orthodoxy into a religion of hatred and war of religions. in the byzantine tradition no, this is all a completely different civilizational approach, and this ventilation approach, he crushed this very european version of russian culture , puts a completely different thing in the center of attention.

in this regard, we have no choice but to try to protect ourselves and preserve the european democratic nation that we are, and for which this tear of a child is really important, not because it is written in a book, because this is how ukrainian civilization looks, primitive and humane, at least empathically, unlike those sentiments that russians have to kill children and they are propagated and even shouted on the streets to washington to washington with bombs and that too and what about russian culture with the e-e poem by yevhen yevtushenko хатя для русские войны ot well, that's it what to ask, they walk the streets of moscow and shout what they want. they don't even hide it because we come to them, they say, do you want it? he says, "no, i don't want it. " he does not lie, he speaks the truth, the heroes of russia, the buffoons all the time

say that we must fight, all russian television channels that call for war, russian citizens who believe that war is normal because we are defending the motherland on ukrainian territory, these are people who are sick of war and the destruction of other deeply ill people, degenerative thinking, and this is also what mr. vitaliy says. we started this topic. i mentioned that volodymyr zelenskyi changed his position. now i understand that simply negotiations with the russian federation will not achieve anything. and to recapture and liberate our territories completely, and what were at the time of 1991, our borders should all be ours, in fact, for this we need to expel the russian enigmas, and we heard that at the summit of the 20th that was held this of the week volodymyr zelensky clearly voices all these positions, there is nothing new there, but the principledness of the president and the supreme commander was felt, but sergey lavrov, of course, the minister

of foreign affairs for the rights of russia who was there called it all , i don't remember exactly how he said it well, no, he said inadequately these are not inadequate demands, by the way. what do you think, after all, lavrov took part in this summit with shame, did he somehow manage to save face, more or less? no, how did you manage to save face yourself? during the bilateral meeting, lavrov did not meet with anyone except the minister of foreign affairs of the people 's republic of china and general ecolon with whom we discussed the grain agreement. it was a technical meeting. well, you can compare the meetings with lavrov during the same meeting with penny and held a number of meetings, that is, meetings on the 20th, that is,

even the same people who were in twenty-somethings did not want to meet with the russian minister, this shows a lot, then lavrov was there for one day, he left, leaving in his place anton silanov, the minister of finance of the russian federation, who in principle agreed with the joint committee, that is, lavrov did not even want to agree with the document that condemned the war and together with this russian, they did not want to quarrel with the host of the meeting, the president of indonesia, vidoda, who wanted to have some kind of final document, but they did not even have enough of lavrov from this one