it's easier to make friends with your neighbors in a group, it's easier to beat the enemy and spend the winter. moreover, and most importantly , support the armed forces thanks to them. we have the opportunity to meet this winter and while we are alone, we are not afraid of enemies or the cold. we will overcome the winter together in a warm country. the house, attract specialists for insulation, prepare batteries, repair and adjust windows and doors, check electrical wiring, take care of a warm room and personal protective equipment, take care of those who are more difficult to develop an action plan in an extreme

situations, discuss the need for a backup generator, equip a room for joint heating, let's beat the winter together, the marathon, the only news on the air is working for you, yuliya galushka, mykyta mikhalov. good night to all who have joined us now and friends. hitting the enemy's hopscotch, as well as after that, the consequences of these hits, since this information will definitely be used by the enemy to analyze how the missiles arrived and which did not we have arrived, let's not help the enemy, plus , besides, the equipment of the armed forces of ukraine, servicemen and the location of the equipment and , uh, our soldiers, there is also no need for a film to be filmed for this, you face criminal

responsibility, including ruslan anton, our congratulations to you i congratulate you how did you get there thanks your colleagues are fine. thank you, too. yes, for the fact that you breathed into our studio. what will we talk about now? 50 million pounds to strengthen the air defense of ukraine, what are we talking about? british prime minister rishi sunek in kyiv announced a new aid package of less than 60 million dollars, the money will go to 125 anti-aircraft guns, equipment for shooting down iranian drones, in addition, britain is further strengthening the training program for ukrainian fighters, they will be trained by british military doctors and engineers. great britain will also help ukraine in support of energy and civil infrastructure , i.e. will provide money for generators, reconstruction of housing, not its repair of water supply systems, the decision assured him that the country will support

ukraine to victory great britain will continue to provide aid until ukraine gets the peace and security it deserves we will stand with you as you rebuild your incredible country this year alone we have provided over £2.3 billion in aid we will next year we will help as long as you do not reject the russian troops, reconstruction, we discussed our needs. export and humanitarian initiatives green from ukraine discussed options for cooperation and concrete steps for food security we are very grateful to britain for its leadership in opening the market for ukraine, we expect that such a regime will be extended antona, there were many warnings after boris johnson resigned regarding the

new prime minister what do you expect from him? how do you now evaluate this visit? it is the first to kyiv . the foreign policy strategy adopted at the government level, it was calculated by the british until 2030, it was adopted even before the 21st war and the conservatives were the main ideologues and implementers of this foreign policy strategy, two things were clearly written there, the first is that the fact that the russian federation is a threat to the security of great britain, and the second is that great britain sees precisely the countermeasure against this threat at the expense of the support of the states of central and eastern europe. ukraine, therefore, in principle, mr. sunok, as a representative of the

conservative party, continues this paradigm, this foreign political strategy, and one can only congratulate his courage for the fact that in such difficult times, he comes to our country and conducts very fruitful negotiations. the fact that he reaffirms this foreign policy strategy , and secondly, he actually reaffirms the statement of the g7 , which was adopted in the summer with the direct participation of mr. josen, on the indefinite military , political and economic support of ukraine and with from the words of our president, it became obvious that mr. sonyakh came not just for the sake of a declaration, but brought a number of specific proposals that will be beneficial to our friendly relations and our strategic interests from the point of view of deterring the russians, and most importantly, if we

analyze the press release of the two of leaders is that the range of issues is not only political or military , but also the economy, humanitarian aspects, energy. that is, it just shows the whole strategic level of relations, at which today our partnership is being built and there are other factors sunakshe sunok that's right, but today we found out, it turns out that we called him son that's wrong and there is such a factor here as the ghost of boris johnson, he often came to ukraine all the time bringing something and here i'm new should the prime minister also meet such expectations or not? is this su-, uh, a premonition? i would call it uh-uh more in imitation of foreign policy due to the fact that he is a foreign policy dog, as opposed to domestic political interests, he is not it changes so often

i.e. taking into account the fact that the russians there for 20 years have introduced an aggressive policy not only in relation to the post-soviet space, but in general against the collective west, then until they change this policy, the british strategy will state that the russians pose a threat to the most striking example is the 16th year, when er six people were poisoned there and so on er or before that, how many poisonings did the russian special services carry out on the territory of great britain , so i would call it just a consistent policy and this is one of the very factors that shows the leadership of a particular state, that it does not fly from left to right, especially in strategic matters

. the zone that the political strategies of russia as a threat here is the consolidation of the elites of the political elites plus all the military and special services of britain. that is, it is not just a phrase, we don't like them, and we decided to write them there in this way. and this is a deep analysis of the existing the situation is so and so and the situation is a few steps ahead, mr. antona, tell me , there is no threat from the british wallet here. i will now explain what we are talking about, using the example of the united states, which helps allocate billions of dollars at the same time, some republicans, for example, mrs. medjuri green, a republican, demands an audit and appeals to the fact that the population of the united states is somewhat tired, so to speak, of the constant inflation of the latest prices there for gasoline and products and so on and

so on, a similar story with the british in there will be no threat in the form of support. what will the opponents appeal to? that’s how the british pay a lot for the non-rotational economy. there are no rubber opportunities. conditionally, it is possible to help ukraine and so on and so forth. there is no such threat today. no, if we are talking, for example , about the united states of america, according to the ministry of defense , about 18 billion dollars were allocated for military support at the end of october. and this country has an economy of 18 million, well, that means manipulation they don't give the last thing right. they don't give 50% of gdp or their own budget to the needs of ukraine. that's why you have to understand that there is a certain trumpian wing in the republican party, which manipulates uh, similar things, but uh, both in britain and in the usa there is a compromise

among the elites that ukraine should be supported in such a way as to put the rashists in their place and once and for all to remove this threat that exists for the states of central and eastern europe because everyone remembers the ultimatum at the end of the xxi year from the leader in fact, it was about the borders of nato in 1997, that is, if, god forbid, something happened to ukraine, the following were the nato states, therefore, ukraine today performs an extraordinary function from the point of view of ensuring security in the entire euro-atlantic region, and they cannot ignore this. he political rhetoric can be completely different there before the elections, but when a person enters the most important position in the state or becomes a member of the congress, then analytics already begins there, the 16th development of the ministry of defense and so on and so on it is clear that the strategic interests of the usa are to restrain

the russians. can great britain now repeat the history of the second world war and involve the usa in the war ? well, i wouldn't call it involvement, i would still call it a broad coalition, of course. yes, i am inclined to involvement, because involvement has a certain team, there is no planet . johnson's final speech as prime minister, when he actually formed his political will there and said that the british should hold on to the united states of america and support ukraine in fact .

in larger volumes to help uh ukraine, the only analogy that can be drawn just uh during the second world relations with the ability of britain uh united states of america is that uh they always perceived the united states of america as a great partner with unlimited financial, military, and political resources that can really stabilize certain things, and given that they have common security interests, the united states can really make a greater contribution to achieving their common security interests than great britain alone. by the way, mr. anton and what is the future of mr. johnson and will he continue to play an important role for our country in the future, and i think he will because if we recall the very first words of mr. sumyka, when he took office, he thanked

the prime minister, he mentioned mr. johnson , because i, again, if you remember, was between sumyka and johnson before mr. johnson took off, and then there was a phrase by sumy that about the fact that he is counting on johnson's great political activity both internally and externally, so i think that he remains such an active moral political leader of the conservative party who will not leave the political game and i am convinced that even now he has an influence on many decisions which this party produces another topic, let's discuss now the fall of a rocket in the polish city of przewod was an accident and it was impossible to neutralize it. this was stated by the president of poland, ange, and duda, according to him, almost all the information that appears in the media is not true. can protect the entire country at once.

of course, if it is not guarding a certain strategic object, that is why they were unable to shoot down this missile. duda, for a certain reason, the missile fell due to certain internal mechanisms that should have worked and neutralized it now let's add to the conversation eh luksheya son, this is the spokesman of the ministry of foreign affairs of poland, łukasz, it's like a greeting to you. i sincerely congratulate you . with the one who released it, why did it fall into the pipeline, uh, we can talk about the terms now, our president set it, our prime minister set it, we know that it was a ukrainian missile that affected a russian missile , we know that such events would not have happened if there was russian aggression and an attack on ukraine well,

now we have welcomed your specialists in poland who will submit all this together and they will also become a box for you ukrainians, what happened after this conclusion, did poland take the next steps understanding that near ukraine, and there is a war going on next door, including from russia, you can expect anything. is poland preparing somehow now, otherwise, it is possible to strengthen air defense near the border with ukraine, until this, since february, we know what is coming from the east that passes from russia, you know, i grew up, i was born , and it was not far from shebudov, and we know very well what happened from ukraine, they bombed two more cities and villages, which are very close to our border, volodymyr, lviv, chervonograd, and others, and we

know it too we always say this to our western partners from nato and the european union that we need to support poland better, not only ukraine, we also need more weapons and support so that russia cannot attack poland, you know our border with the belarusians and russia. they are very, very close in warsaw, and mr. lukash is another topic that also concerns the russian federation, the recognition of its state as a sponsor of terrorism next week, the european parliament can do it . what is your opinion, how likely is it that the european parliament will recognize russia as a country that sponsors terrorism? you know, diplomats always

say that it is another matter. to say that this is russia, well, we know that there will be a rib in the parliament, not everyone supports the fact that russia can be a terrorist, citizenship, thank you for your support, such a powerful partner for us, and i want to thank you separately for you have a wonderful ukrainian language. i can't help but mention it on the air. lukasz yasyna, the spokesman for the ministry of foreign affairs of poland, was in direct contact with us. anton kuchahidze, a political scientist, an internationalist of mr. antona, in your opinion, will they do it or is it possible ? already done correct conclusions from this story. hmmm, another tragic story, as a result of russian aggression by our european colleagues, and in the context of the

increase in the aid that is, it is without a doubt large, but again, objectively , more is needed, mykhailo andrii yarmak constantly says about this remotely, president zelenskyy , has the right stimulus already appeared? for this, in your opinion, based on those statements and those actions that are taking place from sweden, in particular, what large-scale military aid was announced by finland to bulgaria finland i think that the increase in military aid will happen ah and this is a question, well, not even a few months. i think that in the coming weeks we will see a lot of statements on this matter, but it must be understood that military topics during wars, especially about military-technical cooperation, it will be in the media, let's say, in very small doses. but politically

, what confirms my thesis is that in independence, what assessments did different politicians try to give in europe and so on the key thing was that poland, the united states of america, nato countries, they admitted that the culprit is the russian federation, everything, that is, technical issues can be dealt with, an investigation can be conducted, facts can be established, ukraine is even more ready to hand over all the data that we have during the meeting with journalists, president zelensky clearly stated that he does not have any mistrust of the military who reported to him. regarding this tragedy that happened in poland, ukraine is fully ready to take part in the investigation of these cases, however, these are technical things that we will see over time, but politically the key thing is

that everyone understands that the factor of this tragedy is the primary source of the russian federation, all the rest of the details, but it turns out this is the story that every time european partners increase the amount of aid after some terrible tragedy in buch was the first to be intensified, then these terrible shellings in october and the martyrs gave us anti-aircraft defense, and the irises gave them faster and it turns out that every time the european partners need a reason to go out like this well, first of all, it is necessary to understand that despite the incident, there are still titanic changes in the foreign policy of individual states, especially let's take germany as an example, that is, a state that for 20 years lobbied for the energy interests of the rashists, joint businesses and investment projects worth many billions and so on. it is difficult it was

necessary to convince moreover, one more important thing must be understood. germany and france acted as mediators in the settlement of the war between russia and ukraine in the 14th year, and in fact they tried drag to the last the norman format of the minsk agreements because they are mediators, if the approaches are radically changed by policy, then it turned out that germany and france failed in their task, but history has shown that they failed in their task and the mediators could not fulfill it, but in order to convince them, it was necessary time and facts, and here we must pay tribute to the entire state apparatus to the diplomats who were able to quickly find the facts and inform our western partners through all diplomatic channels for in order to speed up precisely the processes of

deepening military-technical e cooperation , that is why, unfortunately, these are the realities of politics, that is, i remember march, the month of mr. scholz's statement, what he said and what he is saying today. foreign policy and to the ukrainian issue at the same time, if these tectonic changes took place in germany, well, yes, sir, he really said something yesterday, how it should be first to withdraw the troops from ukraine, so only after that start negotiations at the same time, president macron, so his french colleague, he is in the opposite direction , like sitting down at the negotiating table is necessary in the first place, and so on and so on, why tectonic sums do not happen in french politics, eh, a very powerful lobby, no less, no less just like it was in germany, that is, it is not like that, you know how in germany you could always feel the russian lobby there, that is, there are a lot of joint

ventures , the energy sector, and so on. investments from russian businessmen amount to 30-40 billion dollars over the last period of time there, 5-10 years, 15 years and so on, but these were not, you know, such strategic investments as in germany and such, you know, european energy projects and so on then, however, there was also a large flow of money. i just don't want to use the er economic er word about bleaching, i won't say it directly, but a lot of money went there and er, well, it's absolutely clear that it's the easiest thing, its segment was very powerful and russians bought a lot from in france, that is, various businesses of a smaller variety , but there was a lot of money, and secondly, it is necessary to understand

that, from the point of view of internal politics, there are right-wing people in france who do not hide their connections with the russian federation. that is, they now have a new party leader however, this is the party of maridlep and it is clear that macron just wants to play on the feelings of the voters and the electorate in order not to lose his weight, and that is why he, you know , emphasizes his diplomatic role because he talked so much with the president of the russian federation and so on, but please pay attention. he doesn't say about the outcome of these negotiations , he says negotiations negotiations. well, forgive me. you only called him once before the war during the war. and what did you achieve? well, for sure, he fulfills the role of the person who keeps in touch to understand the temperature in the chamber, that is, we always violate, you understand, he actually admits that he has not

achieved anything, and now he offers mediation to china, that china will be able to appease russia, well, this is his old idea, relatively speaking, even before the war on one of the of global forums uh, where well, france has a certain format of communication with the african continent, and it was macron two years ago who gave a vision about uh, what would be the schedule of great powers in the modern world, and he then even from the west proposed precisely the strengthening of uh- er ro congratulations, but everything is very simple here, er, russian money plus internal electoral sentiments. here he is trying to play on these sentiments, but at the same time, it must be said that he looks on the international arena well, a little if the teeth leader and these are not my words for two weeks that's why, in the authoritative edition of the renovation of the house in france, there was an open letter from the

internationalists of this country, who are considered to be top , and they directly said that if macron does not change his approach to the ukrainian issue, then france risks not being a participant great history and precisely in the party of great historical e events and e-e france risks losing its leadership i.e. imagine that they first failed the norman format of the minsk agreements and now they are actually failing the formation the formation of an adequate foreign policy regarding the challenges posed not only to ukraine, but also to nato as a whole. and here is just such a moment. well, why are the french internationalists, you know, very enthusiastically involved in this whole story? pay attention, which is active in britain, which has become active in germany, the united states of america and let's not forget about those difficult relations that macron has a spa number

of reprimand, i.e. turkey today relations with scholz is understandable because germany actually announced a radically different policy there and erdoğan's thesis is confirmed that precisely among the top european states , he meant the members of the european union, there is no such leader who can persuade the rashists to do something or achieve a specific result there to stabilize this situation or to promote the common interests of global and precisely in this, for example, macron will lose to erdogan, i.e. today, macron is the leader of europe. he has always claimed this role and france has claimed this role, they will lose competitive leadership to all their others partners, and this cannot help but confuse the elite researchers of this country, by the way, about turkey, they did not

join the oil sanctions, at the same time, yesterday there was a message that the dardanelles bosporus strait , one day before the sanctions came into effect in relation to oil, yes, the lack of insurance for this oil is closing, right ? where it can still be traced back then, turkey clearly has, let's say, two directions, even three, in the formation of foreign policy, right up to the current situation . they did not like the black sea region from the point of view of security, which was disturbed in the balance after the illegal annexation of crimea, this has been going on since those times

. they did not abandon this project even during the war, this is a very powerful step because this is not just an enterprise where you will make fabrics, it is a military-strategic object that will be adequately defended plus military-technical support here, we will say in them completely military- the political direction is completely pro-ukrainian, the second is the energy supply of itself, according to the data of various energy centers, during the last ten years, the turkish economy is the most energy-demanding, that is, they need a lot of energy resources in order for their a powerful economy worked so that it constantly developed, that is, they have an internal demand for relevant energy resources and here they

use the situation with a certain pressure, they can cheaply buy as many energy resources as they need, and the third direction of turkey's foreign policy is ensuring its globality that is, due to the mediation they perform in ensuring the food initiative, they ensure their global role , they turn from a regional state into just after all, for a global leader, that is why the hierarchy of their foreign policy interests is so complicated and, accordingly, the implementation of grain is bought by ukrainians using this grain corridor, well, this is normal practice and they help. everything started to work, there were cases where ukrainian diplomats informed just that