and which, for example, did not lead to any agreement between japan and russia, the soviet union, then there is no peace agreement in russia, and there is no war between these countries , that is, in principle, the war can end simply with the withdrawal of russian troops from the territory of ukraine, complete deoccupation within the borders internationally recognized, including crimea and donbass, everything and what do you need reparations for? and what do you think russia will reparations, and she agreed to do it herself? no, they won't do it, so we don't even need them agreement on reparations must be or another form of compensation due to seized assets must be made through judicial international mechanisms and domestic mechanisms, the third is the responsibility of russia, do you think that it will be so simple that they will hand everyone over there to the tribunal ?

punish us - negotiations brought negotiations, negotiations lead to something, that is, there are no conditions, uh, russia still wants the destruction of ukraine and just a truce in order to increase its capabilities, which are now seriously, well, they didn’t lose. indeed, the initiative is on the side of the armed forces of ukraine. but at the same time, russia wants to wait for a better situation so that it dictates the conditions in ukraine in such conditions, no one, anyone, who would be in a political position would dare to take such steps, because it was b capitulation that's all, that is, in this situation, there is nothing left but to continue the defense of the country and the deoccupation of ukraine . well, even more so when representatives of the same russian authorities, in particular, the deputy chairman of

the russian security council, dmytro medveev, are talking about again about the fact that kyiv is a russian city, did he write in his telegram that kyiv is the capital of ancient russia, firstly, secondly, kyiv is a great and little russian city within the russian empire, thirdly, kyiv is a republican capital within the ussr, and finally, kyiv is simply a russian city in which people always thought and spoke russian so that it was all clear what and how it should be returned, said medvedev, but in the absence of zhirynovsky, perhaps the role of zhirynovsky in the current modern russian politics is medvedev's assigned role is to announce what is publicly well, let's say to go in front of the train and tell something there with such approaches, which are naked bears, with such approaches, which are the majority of the representatives of the russian government, does that mean that

no one will ever come to an agreement with the current russian government, and that, in principle, a period of denazification should take place of the same russia or the period of brainwashing from this russian propaganda is just a frank pounding that is put into their heads. is it supposed to be some uh there 50 years in a period of 50 or 100 years when in principle this country must be developed independently somewhere behind the barbed wire so that representatives of this russian federation are not seen there at all, you know. well, let's start with the late zhirynovsky, well, medvedev is very far from the intellect. zhirynovsky is very big and zhinovsky is cynical. zhirynovsky has always been an enemy of the country, but definitely you can't deny him, uh, the

intelligence under the video is different. well, for example, i don't want to characterize him, it's from a different group, so in relation to uh, what's happening, i'll tell you that it didn't happen at one moment. if you compare uh discussions in the russian establishment in 2000, there in 2006, then already. later they were very serious . what is happening now is probably the consequences of the events of 2005-6, and before the eighth, these years were critical. now we can see that the regression has gone in the opposite direction, but precisely these determined the positions of many of russia's elected officials and when the new ideology was actually announced well, it was finally formed by putin and his closest entourage and which was based, uh, obviously

, on a more authoritarian model and a model that is more 50% of all officials in russia were occupied precisely by the special services, moreover, i will tell you one of the reasons why russia failed in ukraine, and it happened repeatedly that they, that kyiv has a good one. what did they do, for example, in their intelligence, they equated ukraine to the territory well , we have a foreign country and, accordingly, we replaced professional intelligence, as i have traditionally worked here since soviet times, military intelligence was replaced by external intelligence, because how could they perceive ukraine as something external. and the fsb and i i saw what inadequate people started giving information to moscow. that is, you are not surprised that they, uh, did not understand what was happening, that's right, they

threw out all those people who understood what ukraine is, a long time ago, and the final purge took place after 2014, after crimea, that is, those groups who in russia proposed other scenarios and they were before crimea well, i know seven groups that have long been tasked with what to do with crimea, three groups that included experienced diplomats and intelligence officers of previous times, they offered another solution is that they are no longer working. that is, this group of hawks prevailed there, and people who know less what ukraine is, know less, work less professionally, so in conclusion, i will say that what they created in 20 years is theoretically possible in 20 years it would be derailed in the opposite direction if the same

propaganda machine were used, but it is unlikely that this will happen in russia. therefore, my forecast is completely different. i think that we will simply see that this stalk will not be called a fan. and this group of people will come out of the scenes will physically just come off, and only then will the leadership of russia or the group of countries that will be created in these areas be transformed, then we will see what happened there, nothing optimistic, i don't see this process will be very painful for russia, not for russia, i don't care about russia, to be honest, what about them there will be, that is, as this character said, we will all die, they will die, then they will die, and then that means , and then everything depends. nato, we need to set up how ridiculous it sounds,

this wire borders so that there are no illegal crossings, we will have to do this. we will have to really do a completely different policy with russia, this territory and this population have shown their complete inability to live in peace and as good people predicted neighbors, you know by your example, i have met and talked to a lot of people, starting with putin, and there were opportunities to talk about deeper topics and with different people, so you don't count on them for the next 10-15-20 years, we need from them to look for how to close, so what will they have, this is their question, we just need to protect ourselves from their threats, for this we need missiles of medium, small, shorter range that reach their key points, as they say, making decisions for this to us a nato umbrella is needed, and for this we need to finally realize that there are no

good russians, bad russians, the territory of residence of those who stayed there and agreed with such a formula, it largely determines their behavior and support for this regime, and those who wanted leave left long ago in the early 2000s in russia there was no such heroism in order to take a stand against er authoritarianism against expansion i know many people who are russians abroad normal russians with whom you can communicate but who did not leave especially after the occupation of crimea annexation an attempt at annexation, then i think that it is not worth counting on them, that's why i'll say it again. yes, we should be more interested not in what will happen in russia, but in how much ukraine can protect itself from any destructive scenarios russian for the future, we will talk about this in a minute, friends. i want to say that we work on

several platforms at the same time on the air of the espresso tv channel, as well as in our social networks on youtube and facebook. for those who are currently watching us live, please like the video on youtube or on facebook, for one or more viewers watched our broadcast, in addition, you can subscribe and become a sponsor of our youtube channel under this video, you can see the sponsor icon, you can choose a small sponsorship package to help us develop our youtube channel, let me remind you that now we have on the air the politician, diplomat, ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine to the united states of america in 2015-2019, valery chaly, we continue the conversation with him, and to continue, i suggest listening to what the united states secretary of defense lloyd austin said about putin's war let's hear

four reasons why putin's war of choice in ukraine concerns all of us, firstly, it is a direct threat to security in europe , secondly, russian aggression is a clear challenge to of our european allies, thirdly, russian outright brutality is a direct attack on our common values ​​and the rule of law, and finally, the russian invasion is aimed against the international order based on rules that ensure security for all of us. place or determine russia's place on the international arena, this is the big 19, where in fact russia dropped out of the top 20 because putin did not come to the ball, but lavrov flew in and left very quickly, then the court in the hague and the verdict on the downing of the plane mh17, where three

citizens were sentenced to life imprisonment in absentia, two of them are citizens of the russian federation gorka and dubin major general well and the third event is rammstein - 7 who was going and who also discussed the events around russia, judging by the trend of how the world placed emphasis on relations with russia and under the control of russia by officers who were recognized as murderers of 298 people who flew on flight match 17, doesn't this give a reason for the united states of america to decide that the decision about which we started with the recognition of russia as a sponsor of terrorism. if

this happens, if russia is recognized as a country and sponsor of terrorism, what will happen to russia and the world as a result? the lend-lease guideline and then we believe that the land list will be accepted. it will simply be a panacea for this mass supply of weapons and anything else i can find . there are still no weapons, some packages are going there, and rammstein is also not going. it is necessary to do this status, i.e., no, i am for that, i am only for the usa to do it, but the usa will not do it, i do not want to do it yet, because this is the position of the white house, that is, why do we call for it ? well, let andriy yarmak call for his she is against this, and they will go to a

press conference and say what is the position of the government regarding the recognition of such a status. well, they are silent because they know perfectly well that they are categorically against it. the white house will be the last to oppose it, because in the event of the introduction of such a status, they are forced will impose sanctions against their er partners , including european ones, moreover, i will tell you what kind of grain agreement there would be then. maybe if they had such a status in russia, let’s look more realistically at er if it is accepted by the congress for a political such assessment it will be good to grant the status a from the point of view of the executive power, let's get them to implement sanctions as close as possible to this status, that is, even if they do not call the executive power of the usa russia a terrorist state or a sponsor of terrorism, even though those actions of sanctions that are applied would be at this

level, unfortunately, this will not happen. but it is necessary to get closer to this and the fact that the republicans now still got what it means that the position in the house of representatives they will put pressure on the executive power in order to get all the support of ukraine still increased, including in this sense, but i would like to return to what you said about the historic events of this week. what does this all mean if you notice the events that are connected with the jumps with military aid they are quite so consistent and confident, but where political events are concerned, we have not felt such dynamics until recently, we can say that the situation in political assessments has shifted somewhere in those countries that before that tried not to

maintain a neutral position but to avoid it altogether that 's how they say involvement in this conflict well, but it was impossible that's why we saw, after all, from the group of 20 india, i saw that brazil adjusted its position somewhat, well, china , the statement about the impossibility of nuclear blackmail is important even though the german schools warned him that he would go to china and there would be no results , i still believe that his attempts were, well, at least an attempt is important, that is, the world is changing somewhat, approaches are already tired of the russian stubbornness that they traditionally and historically for for russia, any loss or a higher number of dead russians only annoys their authorities, they want even

more, that is, they will destroy as many of their er-er as it was not worth it for something in the future, that is, this situation already er-er is annoying, that is no one wants to be in a position to support them. that is, they are from a country that will lose and this will happen in the future . at the same time, we must understand that all this talk about the end of the war about some kind of truce. peace is what we will have to face in the coming days of the week and of a month. it is obvious that there are a lot of reasons here, from the fact that we feel that the economic crisis can play a new role somewhere, and the covid has not led to any hope for these countries. as it is not paradoxical, for us, these are the nearest challenges, inflation there, criminality, and how for states, for example. that is why it is necessary to understand and be able to

play on the field of your partners in this way. i believe that our opportunities, on the one hand , are decreasing because keeping the focus of attention for such a long period is already a huge result, but the field for the game is is so diplomatic, we talked about the army, the first possible field appears because, in principle, the next period will be won and won not only by the defeated on the fronts, but will win in the imagination of their societies, their countries and the world only if they win in combination efforts, e.e., informational, diplomatic, economic , resources, well, first of all, of course, on the fronts, but all this combination can only give results and there will be

a struggle to consolidate the formula of peace and victory. that is, it sounds so strange, but it is possible to win at the front and lose in geopolitics, that is, for us now for the next year there is a new challenge: how to establish peace and how to ensure the perception of our victory, that is, both inside the country and outside. i want to emphasize that i personally do not allow that there may be any internal political compromises at this stage, this is what we hear there, let's leave crimea, leave donbas, leave the other territories, but i'm just telling you that even from the moment of deoccupation, everything will be the same . directly to the end, i will say what you said about

it, the us minister of defense, the logistician, his position is very inspiring, this is the position expressed by halifax in canada, this is very i will tell you as a participant of many forms of security in the world, and this forum i really like it, i took part there, now they invited me to run because of the circumstances, i couldn’t get to canada right now, but i’ll tell you that what was said there. i watched all the performances very carefully. and the military there are professional people, americans, first of all, canadians, and there is a position of combining victory with certain rules, moral principles, that is, it is a completely different position than china and india, but i know what mr. austin said. we saw the arrival of sullivan and burst, well, this is this movement and the us security council, and here is austin and the state department, they have

a very clear position, and this clear position of the usa consolidates the allies. i am sure that after such statements, even senator ryzh, who told halifax that he will fight for ukraine to receive the f-16 despite the opposition of the white house and what will happen in the near future will depend to a greater extent on us, on the ukrainians, on the armed forces, on their success, on the consolidation of ukrainian society, on the fact that we do not start bringing back the old times to ukraine already at such a time. you see what is happening, some people well, i don't care what's described, well , i personally see these people, they are people from traitors to collaborators, they are put in key positions, they are returned to kherson, they want to be returned to some uh, well, the positions of advisers, they are slowly being pulled back , chase them with a dirty goal, they they will bring you war. i

tell president zelensky, i tell his entourage, drive them out, take responsibility, you need these people of the old ukraine, the old ukraine is not the one that fought against the invaders since the 14th year, it is not poroshenko who can really speak there periods, but he is only uh, well, let’s say that he is personified as an old woman, but these people who are just sitting in monaco are sitting in london, sitting anywhere and slowly, i don’t know the lovochkin, what kind of factory, they are slowly starting to come back and if we don’t, we won’t win this internal struggle in the country within. well, then, this victory will not end for us with the result of the armed forces of ukraine. here, i would like to draw attention to the fact that now we need a struggle on all fronts , why did i name this name, you know, i acted honestly

in my state work, these people whom i named know this and i know everyone by name. we all know. i think they already played their role in ukraine. what role was it? may god forgive them, but what they have to do today's government should be oriented as much as possible to the future must be a different country, completely different and one more emphasis is very important, this country should not be determined by our partners, that is, they help us, they really, uh, we have interactions. taxpayers are under their control, but i will remind you of one episode from the maidan again, the revolution of dignity, when the very scenario was the request of the western countries , led by the usa and other countries that offered the so

-called compromise for the government that was already running, that shot up the maidan, they offered exactly this to the ukrainian people and the ukrainian people, a passionate part of it and those who were on the maidan, simply rejected this formula, well, whether to show olenka as a member is certainly not a character. countries of separatism there, the republic of kryvyi rih well, he is hiding now there russia but the part that fought for ukraine, they just kept the politicians from making so-called compromises i am sure that the ukrainians will now play the same role and the decision will not be about the american will there be a ukrainian solution about the west, which our partners will then perceive as it happened after the maidan, and that is why i am very optimistic about this. and of course, the people who are fighting now, they play a

key role here, they give the opportunity to form this is an independently independent future, will it be prosperous, will it be right away, or will it be right away ? in principle, after our victory, ukrainian politics will also be renewed, including those people who are now fighting for independence in ukraine , because you mention these stories with the appointment of the adviser to the head of the kherson civil and regional civil administration then there was the appointment of dovzhenko center, a very strange appointment, then we saw how surkis and shufrych left the national olympic committee, who were re-elected there, that is, the impression is that a

part of society or a part of the political community still continues to live according to the same principle that it's okay, we'll get stuck there and continue we will be somewhere here, somewhere nearby. we will somehow adjust according to yours. victory will set the accents and let's say that the winners will place these accents in er, in the eye , you know all the configurations that exist in the country. unfortunately, if it were not for the experience of the 14th year, i would more confidently say that it is guaranteed. well, i honestly don't know. these are thoughts. maybe the families of those who fought may have died

. but this is the peace period. this does not mean that if a soldier fights and is successful at the front, he can automatically be successful in politics. it also does not mean the opposite that anyone who speaks correctly is automatically at the front professional no and that is why it should be uh well, i think in the 14th, some steps were taken, a part of civil society passed, here i am, for example, i got the opportunity to work in a high position but i had experience before, and from time to time i did professional things in diplomacy, but now it will be necessary to do something in this regard, probably more actively, and for sure it is not necessary because of the mechanism of some kind of prohibition to participate in the state building of various people but well, to create some elevators for such people under

patriotic loyalists, i must tell you. it is solved very simply by the first 100 people who stand at the head of the country, starting with the president of the government, his entourage around the regional administrations, or there now, the military administration is the key management of the country, which 100 people are correct then the government will be absolutely correct if you are 100 people , there are no such correct ones. but no matter what laws and regulations you create in the country, everything will collapse, and that is why the first six months after six months a year after the victory, they will be critical in order to determine the quality of public administration in the country. in general, i believe that the key is not only the fight against corruption, namely the establishment of justice and , most importantly, the efficiency and quality of public administration, that is, we will have to do this quickly, and better already now and that is why our

actions are so important, not only applications in the eu, but actions already today that would bring us closer to the standards of these applications , we need to pay attention when the people support, but to ensure that partners see what are you doing in fact, you are implementing these difficult steps. look, let's not criticize the day. today is a holiday, after all, more than tragic, but look at our state administration, that is, starting from some decisions, uh, what are purely personnel. we named a few, but such the personnel decision is simply too many problematic decisions at the government level. it’s just that we at the government level are not able to work enough, so we need to make a decision now, which would be prepared for us. not only before the victory, but also until the period after the victory of ukraine. thank you

p valery this was valery chaly, a politician-diplomat , ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine to the united states of america in 2015-2019. friends, please, if you watch us live on social networks, like this video, subscribe to our e-channels on social networks , for today i am putting a full stop i wish you good health. once again, i congratulate you on the day of dignity and freedom , together we will win. this was a program, the verdict was brought by serhii rudenko. goodbye, congratulations, this is freedom. life my name is vlasta lazar, today's issue we start from luhansk region luhansk region village of defense of ukraine are moving forward in the direction of svatovye crimea this was announced by the head of the luhansk regional military administration serhii ha