here are four reasons why putin's war of choice in ukraine concerns us all: first, it is a direct threat to security in europe , second, russian aggression is a clear challenge to our european allies, third, russian outright brutality is a direct attack on our shared values ​​and the rule of law and finally the russian invasion is aimed at the international order based on rules that ensure security for all of us last week valeriy there were three key events that in one way or another determined place or determine russia's place on the international arena is the big 19, where in fact russia dropped out of the top 20 because putin did not come to the ball, but lavrov flew in and left very quickly, then the court in the hague and the verdict on the downing of the plane mh17 where three citizens were sentenced to life imprisonment imprisonment

in absentia, two of them are citizens of the russian federation, gorky and major general dubinsky, and the third event is rammstein - 7 who gathered and who also discussed the events around russia, judging by the trend of how the world arranged accents in the relations with russia and under them by russian officers who were recognized as the murderers of 298 people who flew on flight match 17, does this not give the united states of america a reason to make the decision that we started with regarding the recognition of russia as a sponsor of terrorism if this happens, if russia is recognized as a country and a sponsor of terrorism, what will happen to

russia and the world as a result, i want to warn against one mistake that we often make: we call ourselves a lend-lease benchmark and then think that it will be accepted in english. it will be just a panacea for this mass supply of weapons and everything else, but it does not work, so far there are no weapons, some packages are going there and rammstein is also passing, there is no need to do it i'm only for the usa to do it, but the usa won't do it, i don't want to do it yet, because this is the position of the white house, that is, why do we call for it ? on this recognition of such a status well, they are

silent because they know perfectly well that they are categorically against the white house will be the last to oppose this because in the event of the introduction of such a status they will be forced to impose sanctions against their e-e partners, including european ones, moreover, i tell you i will say what a grain agreement would be then. maybe if they had such a status in russia, let’s look more realistically . let's get them to implement sanctions that are as close as possible to this status, that is, even if the executive branch of the united states does not call russia a terrorist state or a sponsor of terrorism, then at least those actions of sanctions that are applied were at this level, unfortunately,

this will not happen. that the republicans now still got what it means that the positions in the house of representatives they will put pressure on the executive power so that all the support for ukraine will still increase, including in in this sense, but i would like to return to what you said about historical well, there are significant events of this week, what does this all mean, if you notice the events that are connected with the jumpers with military assistance, they are quite so consistent and sure, but where are the political events er, we did not feel such a dynamic until recently, i can say that the situation in political evaluations has shifted somewhere, after all, in those countries that before that tried not only to maintain a neutral position, but to avoid involvement in this conflict at all, as they say

well, but this was impossible. that's why we still saw india from the group of 20. i saw that brazil adjusted its position somewhat. well, china . it is important to state the impossibility of nuclear blackmail to the cashiers of germany. scholls, although he was warned that he would go to china and there will be no result, after all, i believe that the attempt was, well, at least an attempt is important, that is, the world is changing its approaches somewhat, it is already tired of russian stubbornness, which they are traditionally and historically for russia, any loss or more for the dead russians, it only annoys them with the authorities, they want even more, that is, they will destroy as many of their own

as it was not worth anything for their future, that is, the situation is already annoying, that is, no one wants to be in a position of support, that is, they are from a country that loses and this will happen in the future , at the same time, it is necessary to understand that all this talk about the end of the war is about some kind of truce. peace is what we will have to face in the coming days of the week and month. it is obvious that there are a lot of reasons here, from the fact that we feel that and the economic crisis can play a new role somewhere and the covid was not going anywhere for these countries. as it is not paradoxical, this is exactly what the nearest challenges are for us, inflation there, crime and as for the states, for example. that is why it is necessary to understand and be able to play on the field of your partners in this way, i

believe that our opportunities, on the one hand , are decreasing because keeping the focus of attention there for such a long period is already a huge result, but the field for playing such a diplomatic game, we talked about the army, the first possible field appears because in the principles are the following the period will be won and won not only by the vanquished on the fronts, but will win in the imagination of their societies in their countries and the world only if a combination of informational, diplomatic, economic resource efforts wins, well, first of all, of course, in francs, but all this combination can only give results and will go the struggle to consolidate the formula of peace and

victory. that is, it sounds so strange, but it is possible to win at the front and lose in geopolitics, that is, for us, next year, a new challenge arises: how to establish peace, and how to ensure the perception of our victory, that is, both inside the country and outside. i want to emphasize that i personally do not allow the fact that there can be any internal political compromises. at this stage, this is what we hear there, let's leave crimea, leave donbas, other territories, but i'm just telling you that even from the moment of deoccupation, everything is the same. this struggle will not end, and the war may not end. it is necessary to understand this already, to start working in this direction in conclusion, i will say.

his position is inspiring, this is the position expressed at the fax forum in canada, this is very much, i will tell you as a participant of many forms of security in the world, ah, this forum, i really like it, i participated there now, they invited me to run, due to the circumstances, i could not make it, namely now to canada but er, i will tell you that what was said there. i carefully watched all the speeches . in terms of principles, that is, it is a completely different position than china and india, but i know what mr. austin said. we saw the arrival of sullivan and burst, well, it is this movement and the security council, but austin and the state department have a very clear position, and this clear position of the united states

consolidates allies i am sure that after such statements senator ryzh told halifax that he will fight for ukraine to receive the f-16 despite the opposition of the white house and that what will happen in the near future will depend to a greater extent on us and on the armed forces strength from those successes from the consolidation of ukrainian society from the fact that we do not start bringing back the old times to ukraine already at such a time. you see what is happening, some people appear here. i don't care. it's about psg. i don't care. traitors to the collaborators, they are put in key positions in kherson, they want to return them to some, er, positions of advisers, they are slowly drawn back , chase them with a dirty goal, they will bring you war i tell president zelensky, i tell his entourage

drive them out, take responsibility, you don't need these people of the old ukraine, the old ukraine is not the one that fought against invaders from the 14th year, it's not poroshenko, who can really speak there from those periods, but he only, well, let's say he personifies the old one, no, and that's it these people who are sitting right now in monaco are sitting in london, sitting anywhere and slowly the marmots are there, i don't know, lovochkin, what kind of factories they are slowly starting to come back and if we don't win this internal struggle in the country, well then well this victory will not end for us with the result of the armed forces of ukraine. i would like to draw attention to the fact that now we need a struggle on all fronts. why did i name this

name ? we know. i think they already played their role in ukraine. what role was it? may god forgive them, but what they have to do is that today's government should focus on the future as much as possible. it should be another country, a completely different one, and one more emphasis is very important. the country should not be determined by our partners, that is, they help us, they really interact with us. i agree that the help to restore the country should be if they invested their taxpayers' money, then under their control, but i will remind you of one episode from the maidan again, the revolution of dignity, when exactly the scenario is the request of western countries led by the usa and other countries that offered the so-called compromise for the government that was already running that shot up the maidan

, they offered exactly this to the ukrainian people, and the ukrainian people from its passionate part and those those who were on the maidan simply rejected this formula, well , to show olenka as a member is certainly not a character. but nevertheless, such people as a member, they just called for the division of the country of separatism there, the krivoy rog republic. well, he is hiding now there, russia. but the part that fought for in ukraine, they just kept the politicians from making so -called compromises, as i am sure that the ukrainians will now play the same role and the decision will not be about the american or the western decision, it will be a ukrainian one, which our partners will then take as it is happened after the maidan, and that's why i'm very optimistic about this. and of course, those people play a key role here, they provide just the opportunity to shape this independently independent

future, will it be prosperous, will it be free right away, or will it be right away? well, it's hard to say, but they will immediately be free, independent, uh, more fair. i'm sure , well, you're convinced that, in principle, after our victory, ukrainian politics will also be updated, including those people who are now are fighting for independence in ukraine, because you mention these stories with the appointment of the adviser to the head of the kherson civil and regional civil administration, then there was the appointment of dovzhenko center, a very strange appointment, then we saw how surkis and shufrych left the national olympic committee, who were re-elected there, that is, the impression is that a part of society or a part of politics still continues to live according to the same

principle that well, it's okay. nearby we will somehow adjust according to yours, here the victory will set the accents and let's say the winners will place these accents in the eye of all the configurations that exist in the country, you know unfortunately, if there was no experience of the 14th year, then i would more confidently say that it is guaranteed yes i won’t say that, maybe we should think about the implementation of some legislative regulations, maybe it won’t be exactly the same in relation to the constitution, but to foresee a more active participation in politics of those who, well, i don’t know honestly. maybe those who fought died, but this is the

peace period. this does not mean that if a soldier fights and he is successful at the front, he can automatically be successful in politics, the same does not mean the opposite, or anyone who speaks correctly is automatically at the front professional no, and that's why it should be, well, i think in the 14th, steps were taken, part of the civil society passed, here i am, for example, i got the opportunity to work in a high position, but i had previous experience, and periodically i did professional things there in diplomacy, but now it will be necessary to do something in this regard, probably more actively and for sure. it is not necessary because of some mechanism of prohibition to participate in the state building of various people, but , well, to create some elevators for such people, patriotic devotees, it is necessary, i will tell you. it

is solved very just the first 100 people who stand at the head of the country, starting with the president of the government, his entourage around the regional administrations, or there are now military administrations, this is the key management of the country, that 100 people are correct. they were the government is absolutely correct if you are 100 people , there are no such correct ones. but no matter what laws and regulations you create in the country, it will collapse, and therefore the first six months after the six months and a year after the victory will be critical in order to determine the quality of public administration in the country. i generally believe that the key is not only the fight against corruption, but rather the establishment of justice and, most importantly, the efficiency and quality of public administration, that is, we will have to do this quickly, and better. already now, and that is why our actions are not only applications in the eu, but actions already today

that would bring us closer to the standards of these applications , we need to pay a lot of attention when the people support but to ensure that partners see what are you really doing and these difficult steps are you implementing, this is difficult, you look well let's not criticize the day. today's holiday is still more than tragic, but look at our state administration, that is, starting there with some decisions, er, which are purely personnel. we named a few, but such personnel decisions are simply too many problem solutions at the level of the government . it's just that we at the level of the government are not able to work well, so we need to make a decision now that would prepare us not only for the victory, but for the period after the victory in ukraine, where is mr. valery this was valery chalyi

politician diplomat extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine in the united states of america in 2015-2019 friends, please, if you are watching us live on social networks, like this video, subscribe to our e-channels on social networks, for today i am putting a full stop i wish you all good health. once again, i congratulate you on the day of dignity and freedom. together we will win. this was a program, the verdict was brought by serhiy rudenko. goodbye. let's see how people who suffer from rheumatism and arthrosis live. they heard that the weather is changing, right? dolgit cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves the mobility of the joints because it breaks the joints. the only yellow cream for joint and back pain can be bought with

a 15% discount. be a black friday ad but we are canceling this ad we are 50% on megogo so that in the future you can afford to relax sometimes i have a choice and discounts to choose from choose what you want on megogo русский peace invade ukraine destroy ukrainians to survive we have to defeat inhumans everyone together with the entire country, mykolaiv teenagers from the public association of dreams junior, together with the espresso tv channel, announced a fundraiser for the purchase of 200 silencers for weapons for ukrainian soldiers, in turn, our polish friends from the enterprise fonstropol volunteered to invest 50% of this project for every hryvnia you send, they will give their silencers and fire extinguishers to the

frontline soldiers defending ukraine on the first line of fire, let's get closer to victory together glory to ukraine glory to ukraine the usual time the usual channel the same host my name is yuriy fizar and you watch as usual on mondays at 12:13 on the espresso tv channel, the program world during the war i discusses with its guests the most important things that happened in the world, obviously with reference to ukraine and before i want to start actually i want to congratulate all of you on the day of dignity and freedom, the holiday is very important to us, we will defend our dignity, as well as freedom, as well as the right to be free and free from moscow, we will defend it, first of all, thanks to our guys who are now on the front lines. thank you to them and you congrats once again , so what? so, today, i have a lot to

talk about with my guests, i will introduce the first one in a moment. only in watch on social networks, but on the air of the espresso tv channel, but now to those who watch on social networks and in particular on youtube, please put your favorite if you like the program, don’t like it if you don’t like it, although i really hope that it won’t be like that, and write something first it is very important for us to know what you think, and secondly, it is necessary to promote the program in the complex youtube algorithm, which i do not know , but to hell with knowing, i do not know. the main thing is that you put likes or dislikes and the program will spread. i really want it. and today we decided to ask you if anyone watching on youtube can vote on the question whether the european parliament will call

russia a sponsor of terrorism . why am i asking you about this and because this week on wednesday somewhere between 13:00 and 13:00? 00 and 14:00 in the european parliament will vote on many resolutions and one of these resolutions will be the resolution on recognizing russia as a sponsor of terrorism between 13:00 and 14:00 according to kyiv. look, i must have told you in the evening. and now i ask you does he recognize and the answers are as follows. the first yes, the second - no, and the third - express concern. please vote somewhere in the middle of the program, i will add the intermediate results, and at the end of the program, i will add the final results. i will be very interested to know what you think about this. it's time to introduce the first guest. this is petro burkovsky, executive director of the democratic initiatives foundation named after

ilka kucheriv, mr. peter. congratulations and glory to ukraine. i congratulate you, mr. yury. thank you for joining me today . the question i asked the viewers on youtube is whether the european parliament recognizes russia as a country and a sponsor of terrorism. how would you answer it? there are all the reasons for this. the european parliament is an institution where there are many of our friends. all sanctions against russia are military, its parliament, if the program was more decisive about the blocking of russian oil, then a resolution was passed on the complete education of both russian oil and russian gas, so yes i i expect that there is a very high chance that russia will be called a country of terrorism, there is one point of

caution - it's the fact that countries such as france, germany, italy, hungary, austria, of course, they will try through their representatives to soften the text itself the text itself in this resolution, but well, the diagnosis is already obvious and this is already a question, you know, more honor to the european parliament to call a spade a spade , finally, mr. peter, but look, you say soften the text in the text, at least in that volume of texts which was discussed in october, it is precisely that russia is a sponsor of terrorism, how can it be mitigated? well, for example, mitigate it in part. you can see that the resolution of the european parliament consists of a part where an assessment is given, and there may be harsh words, but there is a part what is recommended to be done by the member states of the european union and, first of all, by the european commission. this is where i think

everyone will try. that is, all the e-e forces and openly pro-russian those who think that it is necessary from the previous face of putin, as they call it, yes, that is, no they will try to completely sever all ties . in the part that will indicate what needs to be done to the european commission, they will try to postpone the introduction of more severe sanctions. and we, for our part, through our friends, especially after the incident in poland, will insist on the strictest possible sanctions and after the incident in poland and for us it is very important after the last incident at zaporizhzhya npp and therefore you know for me personally the indicator of the success of this vote will be the current will appear in the text, this is a resolution of the european parliament, a call to introduce sanctions against the atomic bomb. this is extremely important and critically important for us. i think our diplomats are already talking about it with our closest, biggest allies in the european union. well

, i really hope that this resolution will be passed on wednesday. through voting and everything will be the same. what are you talking about, mr. peter, but let's talk a little about something else. last week, some kind of rocket, because so far even the poles do not fully say which rocket fell on the territory of poland very close to of the ukrainian border in nato, for example jenstotenberg , the secretary general said that this is a ukrainian missile that was launched to intercept in the united states of america, they also say that it is too early to draw conclusions, you need to wait for the completion of the investigation, but with a high probability it could be a ukrainian s300 missile from the beginning, the president in poland andrzej duda said the same thing that with a high degree of probability it is a ukrainian s300 missile but we do not blame ukraine and here yesterday in helsinki the prime minister of poland mateusz speaking at a press conference, muravetskyi said that oh, come on, let's not

talk about it for now, we'll wait and see if this incident can end, because look, i have the impression now that the world is trying to do everything to let everything down so as not to say that it was a russian rocket, don't say that it was a ukrainian rocket, so as not to quarrel with either of them, or with that. yes, i think, yuri, you are absolutely checking to plan er-er always looking for this most difficult path between force and harida, in this case force is eh is russian the threat and the risk of encountering the directions of the collision with russia a harinta is a shame, it is a shame and an internal shame within nato and a demonstration of its weakness when the threat appeared a real threat to security people died and it happened as a result of a deliberate military attack and here the question is not

in the matter of whose missile fell and in the fact that this war has crossed the borders of nato and nato must give an answer, well , how to find this answer so as not to face a direct attack by russia and on the other hand punish russia sufficiently here, i think will start to look for different options from it is very important for us to one simple message if you want to punish russia for aggression if you want to protect your territory give us enough weapons to defeat another preschool defeat of russia in donbas now it is extremely important as soon as our troops can free and donetsk and luhansk, the war can by and large be considered programs, of course there remains the issue of crimea, it must be released, but now russia has made the main bet on donbas, if it is defeated there well, do not dare to threaten this situation in the

european union and nato. and please tell me, in this situation with the fall of a ukrainian missile, a non-ukrainian missile on the territory of poland, is the right position taken by the leadership of ukraine a-a i think you know that this is a difficult question for the leadership but you know the first reaction, i think it was right, it reminded me of july 17, 2014, when we had evidence, we immediately said that it was russia, and a few days ago, the court in the netherlands confirmed that the first position was that of the ukrainian authorities. on july 17, 2014, when the maloziya boeing was shot down, it was the right reaction, the right reaction, and now the ukrainian authorities have also taken the right position that this is an attack against nato, you finally have to open your eyes and say that this is not a ukrainian war , not a ukrainian crisis - this is a european war and accordingly a hundred