proclamation by the president is already a question after our victory p. kostyuk e. if we talk about the last massive missile attack, what can we say about this tactic, because, well, obviously, the russians have changed it and they are already making these isolated shots of ukrainian infrastructure or military facilities now they work exclusively with mass shelling and there somewhere 20% of the rockets break through and such cause damage and what can we hope for in the future and here i want also in the context of the latest news that the minister of defense of poland asked those petri systems for air defense that were supposed to be sent from germany to poland to transfer them to ukraine and the poles have already agreed, taking into account those semi-automatic ones that always work . in one of all ukrainians, as far as russia still has no such volleys of

missiles, in your opinion, oleg sinyutka said very well about how we should behave, we should treat even a stranger, a ukrainian, as we would like them to treat us and then everything would be fine, but here the question sounded and the quote went on that very russians are begging for negotiations, they are intimidating, and lukashenka, who illegally leads a neighboring state, became involved, i reminded myself of the beginning of the 20th century, when hetman skoropadskyi signed a peace agreement with the bolsheviks the bolsheviks were weak then, the germans were under petrograd and starodubshchyna. and this is actually the land where his ancestor started, the part of

belarus where cossack regiments were formed during our liberation struggle in 1648-1654, all russians then the bolshevik government submitted everything, signed not only that, a strip was made from the border where there were no russian troops and as soon as the germans began to leave ukraine, they forgot everything, waved their hands and started doing their own thing . the articles are concluded that each time they reduced reduced reduced ukrainians have their own special experience therefore, in no case should we believe them because it will end in a catastrophe and the destruction of the ukrainian nation as such now regarding

years, well, this is not a small number of missiles, after all, seven dozen, this is, i’m sorry, not a small number, and again, our er, er, air defense forces showed what they do and how they do it , and how many they shot down, this is a very large number, believe me practically more than 80%, what will happen next and what can we hope for, of course, a big thank you to our neighbors, the poles, this is both noble and true and they probably feel the most because this is what happened in history. when ukraine lost its statehood, the poles either had very large problems immediately or over time, they lost their statehood, and right from the beginning we say that the europeans, the russians , will stop, he will go further, so the poles and the

baltic countries feel it, and it is reasonably possible, and the germans somewhere in their hearts would like to give up right away, but they do not dare. therefore, while the conversation is going on, i think that the conversation should end positively in this studio in july, er, there was a conversation about the fact that american politicians and generals proposed to close the sky over western ukraine so that it would be possible to er, so to speak, to treat our displaced persons in peace, to keep them away from this brushed aside, now the conversation is again about the closed sky, well, some experts say that you can’t close the sky, of course you can’t close it completely, but there is such a saying that it is covered to cover a certain part of ukraine, and as you can see, even if they don’t do it right away, you were talking about petriv patriots, well, the range

is practically up to 100 km, we know how far it is from the border to the same lviv, that is, you understand what we are talking about, but there was another event that is closely related, and it was also mentioned today, and with what will happen in the future, look, the european parliament recognizes um, the russian federation is a terrorist state, now we are asking the same question: a nuclear state can be a member of the security council, a terrorist state, that is, something must be moving and there must be a question to exclude them, there is one more question, you do not emphasize this much, but ukraine is the first and so far the only one country in the world that has given up its nuclear weapons. and no matter what anyone says there and no matter what china plans there, but they understand the precedent that is being set in the world, if i don't have nuclear weapons, then you are weak, that is, the arms race is

building up, and you know what is already happening a bipartisan appeal to the secretary of defense of the united states to finally give the ukrainians something more solid about how the hostilities will develop. i think well, first of all, it will be very bad for us if they are frozen and i think that they will not be frozen. but we'll see what the weather will be, but they're giving us light cars that can't be loaded, and of course it looks like this well, you can say it in different ways, but it looks like this, considering the fact that the russians threw a very large and serious force into the area of ​​bakhmut, and there exactly are the paratroopers of the marines who left the right bank of kherson, there is a little reinforcement

. the dnr should be in those borders, which are the administrative borders of the regions, and they do n't have that, so that they have to do something about it. they have to reach some kind of result, and if the weather is good, and they will give us the weapons we need, because it 's long overdue and and tanks and planes and patriots a behind the petri dishes, there is something else that is very interesting. israel made an application. did you hear what they will provide to ukraine if russia takes missiles from iran? i don’t know what is better or worse, because what they said in a certain way deters iran from providing these missiles, but if if this were to happen, it would be very serious. we would

get a lot of rockets, so that would allow it. it follows from the statement . needed we have weapons the later you bleed on the fields of europe and it seems to me that this is just maturing and it is quite possible that we will feel it even before the new year well, not to mention that in our country, from abroad , specialists are being trained for certain types of weapons that is, now is the moment when the united states of america and our allies have to decide on some kind of action, well, first of all, to give us weapons, and maybe even further, because it has gone too far, i can’t imagine how

people are now at the security council, who are the representatives of the country, who voted for what well says great britain er the same france will communicate with the representative of the terrorist state. well, this is the same kind of attack, well, that is, it has not yet been reconsidered, but uh, this process is going on , and what is great, uh, great hope, what is it, considering the weather and so on, there will be not only weapons provide and they will provide and er ammunition so that our guys are less cold and feel better in that situation, mr. tsymbalyuk, but still, mr. kostyuk briefly, and they will be massed again. these are the types of shelling , many rockets on energy. what do you think, please, it is difficult for me to say a few maybe two maybe three, they can’t do it every day, they

save. what’s more, they still produce a small amount, they produce and they make massed ones because, well, single ones are easier to intercept . it goes and and and and it is very tight and still they pass, of course you have to prepare for everything, this is the data from the ministry of defense of our country about how many missiles they have already used and how many they still have. well, there are quite a few. tsymbalyuk today is exactly nine months from the day of the beginning of russia's large-scale war against ukraine, in fact, let's remember this, how then, in what situation was ukraine, the ukrainian people, the ukrainian armed forces, in fact, we were one-on-one with the enemy and those statements

that piskov and lukashenko made then they, er, have changed radically, then the same lukashenko said that in a few hours, russia and ukraine will complete their so-called special operation, etc. and he himself provided the territory and today provides it for russia's aggression from ukraine, in fact, in these 9 months, the world has changed the ukrainian armed forces have become stronger, the ukrainian people, in my opinion, have become more united, and it is thanks to our patriot soldiers that we believed in us. victory and the armed forces of ukraine

are equal today, including the advanced units of nato countries, they already recognize the power of the ukrainian defense system, if you say mr. kostyuk was talking about the external aspect, so today the world too reacts in a way and even those frank interviews of sinn johnson say that in the first months of february and march we were not really supported by europe, some expected that we should supposedly give up, this is also one, as it seems to me, the first portion of of knowledge in order to open the curtain. and how were we treated then? and how has the global political community rethought that ukraine really protects not only europe but the whole

world? and by the way, four baltic states, latvia, lithuania, estonia and poland, have officially recognized levels of parliaments, the state, russia, terrorism or the czech republic , and the european parliament is a truly political signal that will have no legal consequences, but it was followed by completely different signals for the european parliaments and, of course, for the organization of the united nations. we have to finally understand and not be ashamed to admit that russia doesn't care about anything, neither does the russians, as they say, the number of people, nor technology, everything was thrown here ukraine and when putin lost kyiv region, when putin lost

kharkiv region, he lost he still has the kherson region one thing is terror, energy terror, infrastructural and civilian population, but when pisku officially declares it, that is, he admits that it is really a terrorist state that no longer fights but destroys and commits terrorist acts, and the next step is europe already talking about this, which should be created between the state international tribunal and there should be the highest management, not as participants, but as organizers, such as others, and it seems to me that it is already ripe, the parliament at its level has adopted all emphasize all legal documents regarding the creation

we have a base in ukraine thanks to international partners and the prosecutor and the international criminal court, we already have an official legal record of hundreds and hundreds of crimes committed by russians on the territory of ukraine in certain episodes , specific individuals have even been established, these will also be evidence in this court, i would like to i would also like to thank our energy workers, i would like to thank the utility workers and emergency workers, because they are courageous people who, at the level of the armed forces of ukraine, today protect the civilian population and provide the opportunity to supply the army. they are humble people. some of the tv screens from the only telethon tell something restored. it is desirable that you show these people. because they are the ones who

restore the energy system day and night. by the way, which is very complex , partly soviet equipment in europe. dear mr. uh, we have a question about the payment of salaries to state employees , uh, regarding the indexation of other things, we will get to that next year, but the state functions no matter what and it will definitely not be an easy winter, but the spring will have signs of a victorious ukrainian counteroffensive of the armed forces i believe in it volodymyr ogrylska joins the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine head of the russian research center mr. volodymyr we say good

evening to you, it's good that we have the opportunity to communicate, there is internet, there is a connection, and in your opinion, the first thing is there will be both a general and a specific question, two in one, how the western world can effectively respond to this already open terror of the russians against the civilian population, which they do not hide, and in this context, the speech yesterday at the un by their representative, whom we do not respect, who is simply frankly he lies to the whole world about the fact that ukrainian rockets fall into residential buildings by themselves, and they say that the russians do not shoot anywhere at all. to be honest, when i listen to this, i can not understand how they tolerate him there at all and how the same representatives of ukraine are holding back. just not to come. well, excuse me for not using physical force against him, because you really want to throw something into the faucet of the gadget when you are listening to this blatant

lie and he is sitting and saying it. to react react to these missile attacks of a good colleague good health, dear participants of the discussion, for the last few minutes i was so uh such uh just as quiet participant uh and i was very pleased to hear from mykhailo his assessments of what is happening with them, i agree with regard to what russian foreign policy is today, well, it is a failure, it is a collapse - it is called any other word, because it has long ceased to be foreign policy, uh, i would have long ago i would rename the ministry of foreign affairs of russia to the ministry of propaganda of russia, that is, lavrov has not been a diplomat for a long time, although by all his parameters

. there, let's say, in the early 90s, he served nadiya and really did his job competently. but, but then he sold it. -e soul of the devil well, today became the main propagandist in russia, the same can be said about his other deputies , the spokeswoman and so on. that is, this is all. this is all not to be taken seriously. they were given instructions by the secateurs prs, they translated them and somehow lost weight in english and then it all seemed like a peace- loving foreign policy course of the soviet union, this is what the russian foreign ministry is doing today, eh, and eh, turning everything upside down eh ago well there is nothing new in this, how should

our western partners react to it? it seems to me that they react very clearly and clearly. look at the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe, the parliamentary assembly of nato, the european parliament, and they recognize russia as a terrorist country, so some people say that these are political statements, well, of course, political statements, but those are political the statements are then transformed into very practical things, well, imagine how many of us had uh, various friends, sometimes in quotes, sometimes without quotes, who really wanted us to reconcile with the russian federation, well, how today, after what, uh, now these documents have been accepted, how will some leader of a nato country talk to putin in what quality, so to speak, that is, he is talking to whom

, to the head of a terrorist state, i want to ask myself the question and how his political colleagues will react to this, so to speak, to the flea inside the country, or will they not use it right away to lower him below the plinth? that is, these are serious things that may not have a direct effect tomorrow, but the day after tomorrow these are extremely important points. and i think that what mr. mykhailo mentioned about international tribunals is for the tribunal that will actually be created. and i also have no doubt about it. such things will be important elements that this tribunal will refer to in justifying its legal positions , and this is also very important. although it will be implemented a little later, mr. batenko has a question for you, mr. volodymyr. well, i don’t know if you

agree with this opinion. regarding this situation that allowed president putin to carry out this military aggression, well, europe is probably also partly involved in the fact that she professed the position of the politician ms. merkel, panzerkosia there, austria and other countries, after all, mykhailovych quoted the lie of johnson, who actually said in the same interview that among those countries that did not believe what they believed they didn't believe in victory, but she said, well, it's better to let it be as it is, and it's even better if ukraine loses, germany was and is now the current germany, putin is dealing with elected democracies himself, not being an elected democracy for a long time as president of a totalitarian state is actually counting on he certainly does not count on the presidential elections in america if the situation there changes and the democrats move and the attitude towards ukraine changes, which i already want an audit of the finances that he receives

, the situation in the european union will change, that is, will we obviously understand that yes it may not be, but to what extent do you think europe is responsible for this situation that happened to ukraine today? thank you taras for being co-responsible and is now paying for its irresponsible policy during the last 20 years. i absolutely support this opinion and i also tell our western partners about it that now it's time for you to pay. well, we are paying with blood for the great pity of thousands of our heroic daughters who died, and they are paying billions and will pay more more because they finally

reached them. other things and other things, look, in this regard, i always give the example of germany, because this country was the locomotive of pro-russian in fact in europe , it became the country through which putin actually began to rule the european union , because the rulers of germany, you rule this other say it’s obvious and look at what’s happening, well, it’s pleasant. it seems to me like a metamorphosis of a woman who was a minister in one of mrs. merkel’s governments says that we will help ukraine as a future member of the european union. it has not yet been heard from german politicians, well, in principle, they never talked about it as a forty-year perspective in advance. look at what

mr. stein mayer, who was a minister in many governments at one time and now, after visiting ukraine, made a keynote speech and said that we have done we made a colossal mistake, we now have to atone for our failures in relation to russia, and i personally am responsible for it, let's remember one of the leading politicians of germany, the golf-ghanashi blia, who was for a long time and in governments and as the head of the hds faction in the parliament and so on, he says. i also officially declare that we were wrong, this is what the leading political figures of today's germany say, and this means that the leaders of these people finally understand that russia is not a friend but that this is the enemy. yes, there are still useful idiots, there are many of them, there are still people

whom moscow continues to feed from its oil and gas hand, but the trend seems to me to be completely different in europe . them because they are the ones who will help ukraine today, that is why they are the ones who will go further today, even though they will play. of course, we do not need to be idealists and think that they will do everything for us. they will think about their national interests first, but now our interests and theirs interests coincided more and less and that is why we will be together with them and not somewhere in this zone, and this already seems clear to me for many, many of those who until recently had doubts about where ukraine will be, ukraine will be in the west, this

it is important, mr. minister, finally in ukrainian society there was such a consensus and unity regarding the need for ukraine to join nato, you were one of those ministers who practically did not walk this road in the end and ukrainian politicians today declare unity regarding ukraine's entry into nato . i do not consider these traitors to be part of the ukrainian political system, but you, as an experienced professional, gave advice to the ukrainian authorities in order to speed up the process of our entry into the north atlantic defense alliance . you know, i am really such an ossified pronatist, because i took my first steps in this direction back in the mid-90s, when we were preparing the act on a special partnership between ukraine and nato, it

was the year 1996, so of course my position i didn’t change it and i’m not going to change it, and i think that this is the only way to really guarantee our security in this regard. i really wish that our government , having made a very important and what seems to me to be an absolutely correct step by submitting an application, did not develop this step somehow you know such a little strange, as for me, with the proposals that worked on yarmak with rasmusan, because no one can still understand what is actually being said there, where it is written in article 5 of the washington treaty that an attack on one is an attack on all, even a child can understand, but when it is written a lot, a lot words er about er guarantees that cannot be defined which somehow cover each other and overlap when i did not

understand who is responsible for what and now for some reason we are starting to promote it, then the question arises. are we serious about joining nato or are we playing if we have already said that we are joining nato, we have crossed the rubicon, other options do not work if we need to have some kind of transition period. yes, we have an american ally and a british ally. well, it is possible that the french, which are uh, countries with nuclear weapons, so we have to get from them what they did with respect to sweden and finland during this period between the submission of the application and the actual accession, namely, bilateral specific guarantees that in the event of an attack on ukraine, say , britain or the united states of america or france, or they are all together and in this regard they were all signatories of the budapest memorandum and it is in this sense that we must act. and i would like

us to clearly and clearly at the state level adhere to one of these absolutely correct positions , submit an application and do everything to ensure that this application was considered as quickly as possible, and on the spot we are negotiating with our allies, real allies who can protect us, that's actually the whole step, what is the whole path that we must now take next, what then will be the last question i have to you, what we see that russia is committing, this real terrorism in relation to ukraine, to our people, what they declare, and if in confirmation of their actions, it is there