a lot of people remain in the territory of nikopol and the nikopol district. thank you. dmytro bychkov joined from nikopol, talking about what is happening in his hometown. thank you for joining mr. dmytro, and we already have a new guest with us , a member of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. express and i congratulate espresso on the ninth anniversary of its broadcast, which was yesterday. she has not yet gained the appropriate resonance. the employees of the state bureau of investigation together with the sbu came and the prosecutors of the prosecutor general's office came with searches to the energy company vs energy, which belongs to oleksandr babakov, the vice-speaker of the russian state duma. they call him the leader of the luzhniki criminal group in russia. i don't know if he is really it is not, but it is eu energy

, not only that it is of russian origin, it belongs to it, it owns a significant number of shares of kirovohrad oblenergo, chernivtsioblenergo, zhytomyr oblenergo rivneoblenergo and kherson oblenergo, and the percentage of shares is large 95 99 72 96 93 that is, almost all of oblenergo belongs to luzhnikov criminal criminal. in this group, in addition to oleksandr babakov, the owners are yevhen yevgeny ginner, also a member of the russian state duma parliament, co-owner of the moscow football club csk and also misha lushnikovsky is known as mykhailo voevodin , a russian criminal authority, that's all until yesterday, there were no searches there, but already on november 11, the ukrainian court seems to have been able to to arrest the shares of these oblenergos is somewhere in the ninth month of the war. olezhe happened, how can a russian business own almost 100%

of ukrainian oblenergos in the ninth month of the war . when you once again quoted this message, my first reaction was the same as yesterday the end is already time, and these long court vicissitudes really were , because after the decision of the parliament, which adopted a resolution to confiscate moscow's assets in ukraine, these were still long court vicissitudes. the court did not for the first time decide on the arrest. well, and of course, what is important is that in the end, even after a certain period of time since the court's decision, law enforcement agencies began to act because we understand very well that this moscow money works and has worked against ukraine, so the only thing that can be said finally is to wish the law enforcement agencies more active activities in this direction. i will remind you that the general the value of the securities of those arrested is almost 10 billion hryvnias billions 580 million is a huge amount of money, but this is

still the way i understand it for the last russian business that still functions in ukraine, how much is it in general the problem is well, of course, when the aggressor country has economic leverage in ukraine, it is a danger, it is a danger, they are manipulating. they have the opportunity to influence certain decisions, so it is necessary to act radically here, in general, the next session of the parliament will be extremely revealing and it will demonstrate how much the authorities in ukraine materialize their statements, positive and correct statements against the russian occupiers, against russian business, into concrete actions, because in the end they tried to vote in the parliament the decision on the removal of deputies from the national assembly, what is it in the parliament, what is it in the local councils, it has been in the parliament for the third month, and in the end, with battles, it was passed by the committee of the verkhovna rada. i think it is time to vote and support this in the session hall , just as it is time to vote and support the decision to ban

the fsb branch which is called the russian orthodox church in ukraine, because even piskov is already talking about the fact that russian agents are sitting in the kiev-pechersk lavra, so it seems to me that this will be very, very revealing. is it all words and manipulations? external effects are these really actions, we will see it at another time of the meeting, a good signature under the photo of the searches in the lavra, where this pasha’s mercedes lebyd is parked, yes, a citizen of ukraine, and they came to him, well, there were also other so-called security service officers from pivovsk, and these were fsb officers this is simply a brilliant meeting of the officers of two special services on the territory of the ukrainian kyiv-pechersk lavra . it is difficult to disagree here. what status is it in the supreme and local councils? it has been reviewed and recommended for adoption after the third or fourth meeting of the committee. there was such a

strange story because when this draft decision, which was originally introduced by the deputies from the eu, well , god, they did not want to introduce projects from the eu. and there is no need, then the pro-government faction already submitted similar ones, let's accept from the pro-government faction and then the representatives are new to the pzs - this is self-evident, but they simply ran away from the committee when this issue was brought to the committee on issues of local self-government by the way, even when the decision was voted on, the chairman of the committee did not support the decision, but today according to the procedure, there are no reservations that it should not be introduced in the parliamentary hall, so we will see. i understand that many representatives of the government benefit from the presence of the former parliament in local councils why because they know how obedient rabbits vote everything they are told, but you will see only they will have the slightest

opportunity to work against ukraine again, they are they will do it, because in essence they are muscovites, they were working against ukraine and 9 months ago they are working against ukraine and now the generalizations are wrong, not all deputies who came from pro-russian parties and were actually moscow agents or not are correct only in another expression about good russians and bad hands very carefully, well, look, i always give you this example, you and i always discuss p olezhe, your faction of european solidarity in the sumy regional council voted together with the opzzh in favor of appointing your representative of your party is the head of the budget commission, this is a fact, that is, everyone can cooperate situationally, and this does not mean that those with whom they voted are all traitors to ukraine, because the representatives of the national security service in the sumy council are also not agents of ukraine in this matter, if someone votes

and supports the good things that we offer and we did not vote for the representative of the upsj, we voted for our representative who should have headed and headed the budget committee, and today in sumy oblast there is a coup of a completely different side planned night because the former odderkacha who dug in in the sumy oblast are carrying out a coup and now want to return to the leadership of his cronies. this is the same story that they tried to overthrow in kherson. the former head of the region was supposed to return to the status of deputy head of the military administration. this is the same story that happened in to the national olympic committee, the former shufrych surkis and the company returned to become members of the national olympic committee, this is a system that is happening in ukraine today

the systematic return of the regionals and opzzhists in the xix-xxi years and we shouted about it and asked to stop it led to a full-scale aggression in the 22nd year the systematic return of the opzzhists in the ninth month of the full-scale invasion will lead to even greater encouragement of putin to war shufri seems to have been sitting there a grandson and he was simply reassigned that it was easier not to sit, not to sit, but not to sit, but in boxing, but in kherson. it seems that he should have become an adviser , not a deputy, after all, the head of the administration, but still an adviser, this old regional official, but he he refused in the end, he wrote a statement, he wrote a statement after that, when he stood up, well, such a social worker and surkis refused when the publicity began, but shufrych is still in charge. i always just say that the head of the committee , there is blood of people, leave it in this committee on

the protection of freedom of speech, but he heads it in it he has an office, there are two cars, a secretary, two drivers, there are assistants, e.e. extra payment to the sting of the deputy’s tutorship of the committee and no one raises the question, well, to the field, the representative of the pzs will head the committee. why? the truth is not raised by european solidarity during the last vote for the change of committee members, it did not take part in the vote because we asked a very simple and clear question: why do you change one or the other transitions in the committee and do not touch the head of the committee on freedom of speech, shufrych, no one is this did not give an answer and the fact that people do not know that we are raising this issue on behalf of the russian church, this is only happening because there is no broadcast of the parliament because they do not want you to have seen what the position of european solidarity and all unfortunately, let's talk about the church, let's continue , just a few days ago, the council registered a project

to ban the activities of the moscow patriarchate or the rpc in ukraine, the liberation of ukraine from the uoc mp, another step towards a free and independent ukraine, the deputies registered a draft law aimed at banning the activities of the russian orthodox church churches on the territory of ukraine, it is about the uoc of the moscow patriarchate well, the quote from what iryna fris wrote, your colleague from the faction regarding this draft law, is supposed to be complete by this law the prohibition of any religious organizations and institutions that are part of or recognize whether in any form subordination in canonical organizational other issues of the rpc, the purpose of the draft law is to prevent threats to national security and ensure order, because for too long the rpc has been openly ukrainian subversive activities, what are the details of this of the bill and what do you think when it can be brought to the floor or will the committee come? well, in fact, the law is quite simple and clear to the fsb branches, and we all understand that the rpc is simply that the fsb branches in ukraine do not have

the right to legal existence, and here a rather interesting process has already begun. the last synod, which took place after the work of law enforcement agencies , made a decision to restore peace to the kyiv-pechersk lavra. that is, i think that it is impossible to allow such a smooth flow of the uoc mp, supposedly legally, from the russian church. but at the same time, it is not included in the canonical orthodox church of ukraine we can get a pseudo-religious entity in ukraine, which de jure is separated from the russian church, but de facto will not become a ukrainian church, and this is also a great danger , because we understand that the shoots of the fsb. hostile elements, how

should it be done so that it is correct in the parliament and after that, the law enforcement agencies, after that, the judicial authorities will have all the legal grounds to act, e-e law, the resolution of the verkhovna rada submitted by your power as this technically, it will be further implemented, for example, not only in kyiv, but in all communities, very simply, each community, according to the law of ukraine, has the right to determine whether it belongs to a particular church or denomination, and each community will have the opportunity and the right to make a decision. which denomination do they belong to? yes, but then it will be a binding right. in other words, each community, on the basis of the law that will terminate the existence of the russian church in ukraine, will be obliged to consider this issue of its village. and who will it be? the police or who? well, the police must

ensure order and compliance with the law, that is, it cannot exist, for example, there is a village, a village, a city, who has to come there and do it, the executive service must come after the appropriate court decision has been passed, but it must be a specific lawsuit, well , it must not be simple in general, one decision is that all those who belonged to the rpc transfer to the roman catholic church, the greek catholic church, the orthodox church of ukraine or to any other denomination that has legal grounds for existence in in ukraine, according to the law on freedom of conscience in ukraine, the base community, the rotten community, is actually the community that belongs to this church, by the way, i always say this is someone, well, very smart, who wrote in the early 90s, these are the laws, he established that the church does not belong to its own property to the

organization, there is an rpc or ptu and it belongs to the community and the community that makes the decision on the transition automatically constructs the building itself, it is transferred already and remaining in the ownership of the community . as a result of these searches in the kiev-pechersk lavry, as well as in the temples in the temples of the uoc mp of the rivne ternopil region, which may be, well, you have already seen the official notification of the law enforcement agencies that there were also found subversive materials related to anti-ukrainian activities and financial resources in cash and not identified persons who had forged documents. i am convinced that the law enforcement agencies should draw their conclusions based on this and firmly believe that it is not the job of a people's deputy to interfere in the work law enforcement agencies well, let's talk about the exiles, i wanted to see a video of the searches , fsb officers met with sbu officers on

the territory of kyiv-pechersk by the way, this is a very interesting story, that is, about the kyiv-pechersk lavra, but i did not hear any story about similar actions in the pochaiv lavra on the territory of ternopil oblast . it is no secret to anyone that this is such a dark-fearing cell on the territory of ukraine, and you know. my friend has already asked me what is waiting for all those who have to flee and clean up from the pochaiv lavra the documents simply did not understand the situation for me, because what is happening in the pochaiv lavra is no better than what is happening in the kyiv-pecherska, well, about refugees not only in the church but also in politics, i would like you to comment on the journalist of the up, the flyer, who published another investigation battalion vienna-2 fugitives relatives of ministers, he is called, well, the main person involved in this investigation is, well, an investigation such a re-report from vienna, how do ukrainian fugitives live, kyrylo shevchenko, former head of the national

the bank that ukrainian law enforcement officers are looking for , there he meets with the former deputy minister of justice, the only chernishov who is also wanted by ukrainian law enforcement officers. well, later they meet with a member of parliament with former oleksandr granovsky, who, by the way, once seemed to be in the same faction as you. victory is also looking for a ukrainian. i apologize to oleksandr granovsky was never in the same faction with me, he was in the bpp faction, you weren't a deputy then, he just never spent a single day together with me, i am in a prominent faction, the only faction that exists, it was the faction of european solidarity, we were simply not a deputy at the time, but he was a faction, well, pp. sorry for the inaccuracy, but i have a simple question about the effectiveness of the work of ukrainian law enforcement agencies, if mykhailo tkach can simply come to vienna, you will see the wings of this deputy shevchenko in a restaurant there the minister of justice, the deputy, they are all wanted. here they

live in parallel, everyone knows where they live, the addresses of their places of residence, he gives them there and not even how much money they live there, but nothing is used to really bring them back here to the investigation, so that they cooperate with the investigation if they really wanted ad well, it seems to me that this is a rhetorical question to law enforcement agencies, but there is another potential danger that i see being promoted in the ukrainian parliament, is it a proposal or an idea i mean, can you imagine that if, god forbid, the ukrainian parliament votes for people's deputies to have the opportunity not to come to the walls of the verkhovna rada, but to vote remotely? we don't even touch on the reliability of such voting . different battalions want it, please, they will vote yes, all these battalions will then become full participants in the voting process before

our conversation zhanna balanyuka people's deputy zhanna of ukraine we welcome you greetings have a good day good health we are talking about all different battalions about your colleagues somewhere abroad well, let's reflect on how you feel about these battalions of monaco and vienna hryhoriy surkis was a direct figure and participant of the monaco battalion monaco it seems so, and according to the version of our investigative journalists, they generally have a separate, well, separate, large room there with their brother in an expensive, fascinating hotel in monaco, for which they pay, it seems, another two or 3 million euros a year well, it’s their money, we won’t count it. but at the same time, hryhoriy surkis suddenly became a member of the national olympic committee , to which you also joined. to the formation of the

concept of the formation of the national olympic committee in ukraine, please, what can i say to anya, my attitude is to ask if it would have been a few years ago that i left the organization and i see an asset namely for or approach and with such a composition to real enterprises within this organization is quite important and in sports, for example, to one of the key ones because it is called the second ministry of foreign affairs and nok rebroadcasts should rebroadcast precisely about ukrainian e-e narratives on the international arena and so speaking soft power er from the side of sports to influence the agenda including er political issues that's all in sports circles this is what we can do with the current composition of er property in this matter

i have certain certain certain certain questions to of our ability to do this effectively and in a timely manner, that is why i decided to resign from the olympic committee, i do not know how a number of outstanding athletes did it, and andriy shevchenko also announced this, and i do not know that oleg protasov wrote a statement about leaving with this organization, the version of the heads of the federation of athletics and ice hockey also stated that they cannot see themselves inside this organization with the current composition, therefore, here is the answer to your question, roughly yes, mr. zhanna. you lost the election of the head of the national of the olympic committee, vadym gutsaitov is the current minister. now i don't hear about the elections. are you hearing about the elections of the head of the leg? i wanted to ask you

how democratic they were. you lost them to vadim gutsaitov, and many people, well, previously, well, serhiy gubko gubka, an outstanding ukrainian , from the tribune with a pole and after he seemed to have withdrawn from affairs, well, he himself actually withdrew send new elections for the head of the noku and many people wrote about the fact that vadim gud’s site is still bubka two at the head of the ukrainian grandson, that is, that serhiy bubka retains complete control over the new leadership of the ukrainian national committee. about the elections, please, a few words, and whether bubka's control over the ukrainian party really remains even when a new leader, vadim hutsal, came to his head, i want to say first that it was at first like a certain i was approached because i had, relatively speaking, special ambitions, ambitions. at that time, it was not possible to head the national committee. i was

approached by a number of sports officials and heads of the federation who said that we are not belarus and not russia when in our country, relatively speaking, someone is left to warm up a place or simply make corrections of a similar nature. in order to, uh, maintain our influence and possibly have less responsibility , i don't know. they didn't look like belarus, which is directly the national police, the committee of which was headed by mr. lukashenko. that's why i decided to run for office and also try to make this competition, but you asked about democratic elections. and please tell me about in principle, what kind of democratic elections can be held when, conditionally speaking, the minister, the current minister

of sports, takes part in the vote for the position of the head of the arsenic alpine committee . which is directly financed by the ministry, and the representatives of the federation who receive money from the ministry of sports and, in addition, from the other side, vote directly regional sciences. these are the leaders of these cells who were appointed during the previous 17 years by mr. serhii bubka. that is why you would like them. it is definitely not about the democrats. we looked directly at the statute of this organization, which better resembles the statute. a closed joint-stock company and it is very difficult in

such conditions to talk about some kind of democratic approach in these elections, but we tried to do everything we could, we were as open as possible, we presented our program, we called mr. vadym hutzait to a democratic procedure in the form of a debate in order to clarify what a person is going to these elections with, because no one knew anything, he typed, he listened to representatives of the mass media, he did not communicate in any way, that is, relatively speaking the power of the telephone right. well, for sure. i think that now our country defends a little different principles and we are fighting for other approaches in ukrainian politics. that is why you definitely do not represent them.

did you somehow address your colleagues? deputies to help. well, they united there and made a joint statement not to leave, but they were leaving the olympic committee, uh, for the deputies to leave the olympic committee, no, i'm saying that they left the olympic committee, but they didn't leave it. you know what 's the matter, that the deputies including those who are outraged , and at the moment they are initiating a draft resolution about the fact that he should at least go to the minister because, relatively speaking, a person who holds two main positions. that is, it is a usurpation of full reserve power in some birds, then from one side he is the month of sports and on the other hand, he is the head of an important department right after the committee, from my point of view, from the point of view of all offensive people, he is simply not an example, that's

why the deputies see it, too, in general i am outraged, well, i am talking to the tymskyi in the situation that will take place, uh, odious relative personal olympic national committees of all committees , what are they there, he delegated, we have now uh, formed a request to the national sand committee, because according to the charter, only testing for the president all other votes are secret, including those for those people who were included, who have already left or are currently staying. we must know who voted for her inclusion or exclusion, and we have the right to do so according to the statute, so we will to achieve this so that they publish the lists and we saw these people. thank you, people of panezh, you stay in touch. they also wanted to connect oleg sinyutka to this conversation. oleg well, you see, zhan

balanyuk says that it will already be a sign of democracy if huseyd at least writes a summary of powers with the minister and then democracy already won, do you understand ? and the fact that he was elected is actually the federation that he finances the members of the noka in which he also finances as the head of his ministry yes, but he has the right to sign this already well, what have we eaten i personally was sick during these elections. i didn't even write about it on facebook for that reason, even if i know him there, because it just seems to me that this is a young generation, a new generation that can change something in this old woman to the system called the women of ukraine, well , first of all, zhanna, respect for your position, this is really the position of an olympic champion, and this is the position of a real person, a ukrainian patriot, and secondly, let's not stop at the first step, because i thank you for revealing all this the mystery in quotation marks of remote voting, which

took place and cannot be transferred to other areas of our life, and secondly, let's clean up, well , we voted for all the ministers with a collisoscope . to clear these stables that have formed today, and here you can count on the support of european solidarity one hundred percent, because where there is a clear pro-ukrainian position, there we are together, mr. zhanna, what do you think the finale of this story might be and what exactly does it depend on now, please, if we had did he function here, and reputations, that’s the train, after such scandals, people, as a rule, personally make up their credentials and say that uh, well, i left because now we see simply the refusal of uh, the minister of dash of the head of nukht

the head of ukraine's fencing aspiration, we will do everything that depends on us so that at least there is no conflict of interests, although this is uh, conventionally speaking, it's definitely not about a democratic approach, and it's definitely not about uh there are certain values ​​with which we went to the elections in the 19th year , when this power in the field for which i am directly responsible is concentrated in the hands of a person who can be a very good professional. can be very decent eh hypothetically but in any case this is usurpation and it should not be like this. we wish you success in your struggle. zhan balanyuk, people's deputy of ukraine, joined us. olezhe, we literally have a minute left. your offices

of your political power are burning something. the office of european solidarity there was not burned with stones, the windows were broken, what is happening, i believe that this is such an attack from one side on a large humanitarian hub because there are many offices of european solidarity. these are the offices where people are provided with help and support, including our office in poltava. and secondly, this is an attack on the unity of ukrainians. well, i can’t say. unfortunately or fortunately, but no one touches the offices of former prison guards and they want to destroy and incite enmity between ukrainians. i am convinced that if it is not a hand, then it is definitely an order that came from those who want to provoke a conflict inside ukraine today, regardless of whether it is in ukraine or outside the borders of ukraine, but i will tell you for sure that we will not succeed because the windows