that is, the lukashenko regime is roughly the same as the uchilina regime in donbass, this is the occupation regime in belarus, they will not cause us any problems for sure, and we need more of them and will release 15,000 people - this is a corps, a corps, absolutely no problems for the north of ukraine, for sure they won't create it, it's just unreal, eh, in donbas now, 70,000 people are fighting for only 100 km of the front, but 15,000 is a maximum of 15 km, so they can somehow even defend, not that they will attack, but that they will defend, that is he is not lukashenko's takocy regime he can protect himself, uh, perform some task, but transfer it, since the belarusians are not going to be attacked , they understand this perfectly. moreover, and not for long, because we are sending

a battalion to that world in a day, russia, but we will defeat them on monday. and what will andriy ryzhenko, an expert from the center for defense strategies, say. circumstances, let's say broadly, let's ask the question, i.e. the presence of the weapons themselves, the presence of people there, the presence of the possibility of these armed people moving there to kherson oblast or to, e . that ukraine represents the biggest threat to security in belarus in terms of the use of airspace for a possible airstrike , everything meant well during these months of

the war, and in recent weeks we have seen such training flights of such mi-31k aircraft carrying these kinhar 47 hypersonic eye packages, well, there was information that allegedly on the territory of belarus there were deployed, they were used eye ram bombs, the flight time here is very small to mono to kyiv to the capital of ukraine and to other cities, it is clear that there is a papilloma system, so they strengthened it in the future, it will be written, but that factor there are prospects for this further cooperation, we know from the morning that the minister of foreign affairs of belarus was previously something you and there discussed the future and the future operation there, the use of belarusian territory

for defeat measures, such as missile aviation, it is dangerous for us. you have to take into account everything that concerns the forces that are stationed there, well, it is such that, in principle, russian propaganda is on the gold, it is working there quietly, it is on he lures his boxing to these 10-15 thousand roads that support this so-called social military operation. it is also known that from the side of belarus the population there, considering that at the beginning of the war, it absolutely did not support its majority, it did not support greece, but there, too, a certain process is going on, although there, again, the majority

of the population, as they said, they support ukraine in its struggle for independence. well, i think that in any case it should be kept very seriously, well, keep your eyes open, what is the operational situation in belarus, because well, there it is really possible with large forces and special units of wooden measures that can harm us, including the supply of weapons and in the energy sector there, i have they mean group a. and here are these artillery strikes, or rather missile and aviation strikes, so we need to be prepared and in general maintain our forces, but we really, despite what happened in february

, will not be able to do this because, in principle, well, we were preparing for this and the enemy knows about it , see one more question, again to mr. romanov , i turn to romanov, ah, what is happening with the poles , such stories are also about the patriot pact, i.e. counter e-e counter air combat against e-e what is flying here near us near everyone rockets near all ukrainians various russian and so on, on the one hand, they say that it is necessary to protect nato territory and not ukrainian territory, but as far as we understand, we see that a couple of missiles are different - well, maybe they are ukrainian, but due to russian actions they got into polish territory, legally, at least the western western

ukrainian sky can be protected it's just me, i'm not a military lawyer, but i just have the impression that if there were just f-16s flying there and on their territory without crossing the border of ukraine and the patriot stood on the territory of poland, then maybe it would add strength to lviv, lviv oblast, galicia, volhynia, that is, those territories that are close to the border that border poland. patriot anti-aircraft defense systems to block a part of our sky at a depth of about 100 km from cruise missiles and at a depth

of up to 200 km from russian air defense systems, with russia receiving a fictitious area rossirovaniya type of transporter or bombers well, at least the ukrainian air force is corrected with the plane and they do not reach zaporizhzhia to the western er borders of ours, here cruise missiles reach a depth of at least 100 km, you are located along the border of ukraine and poland, they could cover the sky with what do you remember the second task, our anti-missile systems could be moved in the direction of a-and to the east, closer to the center of efforts, the anti-aircraft density of our already armed air forces of the defeated forces of ukraine therefore, this is the optimal option that poland can now at least offer, not to mention that they can also be located on the territory of ukraine and already cover an area about 200 km from the border with poland, and both options are

now being technically worked out. he completed more once again, there will be enough boundaries to pass that the agreement and the implementation of the so-called line of transfer of control between the air defense forces of ukraine and the air defense forces of andriy, and what do you say, this is an important point. and why is it not done then, that is, it is simply the same logic of nato that we we are afraid to irritate putin so that putin does not launch a nuclear, chemical or some other attack on the european continent, therefore we do not want to come so close to this in order to help ukraine so effectively actions in the interests of ukraine on the part of one of the nato countries they have to agree as members of the alliance, and i think

that such consultations are definitely going and now it is necessary to convince and it is much easier than when we say there in february or march, this system is really necessary patriot because it is well, it is very effective against ballistic missiles, which our system actually shoots down with low efficiency, and the patriots here are planning to get a pension from all the iranian missiles that can be delivered. this will be a very serious threat, especially if they will be used from the territory of belarus where, in general, the approach time is quite short. well, again,

it is very important here to conduct these consultations , or let's say the risk assessment in terms of these euro-atlantic obligations between nato and here i think the consultations are going on but the situation is changing very much and this is the missile terror that russia is currently carrying out against the entire ukrainian people for two months and when on russian tv channels it is openly said that we are destroying the people of ukraine, that's what i think affects these discussions, but in any case, such consultations are needed. look at one more question. well, i don't know how it would be for me. it would be difficult for me. and what is the effect on the

ukrainian army of the shelling of ukraine on october 10, 23 november that is, we civilians are suffering in kyiv and i live now in lviv, i hope temporarily and i see all this and i see how it is in my life. i see a lot of people around who are affected by this, but we are civilians. okay, there is no there is no light. well, there is no hot water. well, for some reason, the computer doesn't work and so on, and the people who are directly at the front are affected by this , that is, the russians have a military calculation with this bombing and missile launch, or are they only fighting with civilians, mr. roman? please, any army is an autonomous structure

, it does not have auto-novelty, it is a very bad army , therefore, any army in the world is ashamed of full auto-novelty in order for me to carry out combat tasks at any point from the desert and ending in the mountains, and of course our armenians our exception is that they also autonomously have certain moments when it is possible to use civil , some, some infrastructure, the same energy , water supply, etc. in principle, a complete disconnection from civilian objects does not bring absolutely no damage to the army. it is possible to say

that all that putin does is all that is done by the russian federation, but it is directed only at uh, it is uh, at the destruction of the infrastructure of the civilian infrastructure in order to incline uh, our foreign-political leadership to capitulation because of the already genocide of the ukrainian people to the army is absolutely not miliyaet, that is, so that i understand , that is, medicine, water, food, gasoline, doctors, etc., everything in the army exists autonomously, and if there is no light, there is no gasoline, for example, this does not mean that ukrainian tanks are not refueled and armored personnel carriers are not refueled , and if someone is wounded, then medicine must be waited for from kyiv or from lviv, there is everything autonomously, correctly, i understood, please, mr. andriy ryzhenko. well, indeed. well, if you have combat

units, they must be fighters phraseology eh, well, energy is provided by autonomous means, and if there are many of them, eh, we will tell you many times , eh, they have options in case of any military affairs there, that is, there are many such levels of duplication , there may indeed be separate parts of the military that are in places and they also use the infrastructure, let’s say the general general state infrastructure, but in any case, it is absolutely a one hundred percent rule that military units also have an autonomous source of energy, that is generators, and i think that now they are fully equipped. if it was a measured time, then now. that is, well, all the more so, in principle, someone can and

does have an influence, but it is relevant, and only in parts, well, let's say, maybe in the management bodies, in the support units , in the combat units, in fact, there is no influence. well, as for the can such a greater influence of fashion on the military conditional news is caused by the fact that their relatives and their families are generally located in places in the villages and here they sell they are somehow there or support connections and in principle well, how would it affect there well, but well, again, there is one thing in general, the determination of the scheme of our energy engineers in order to submit it is in general well, how would it be minimized thank you, mr. roman svitanok, military expert, colonel of the reserve of the armed forces of ukraine a military pilot and

instructor and andriy ryzhenko, an expert at the center for defense strategies, a captain up to the first rank of the reserve, i would definitely like to have them. i would like to ask exactly the same question about the russian army, are there medicines or are there clothes or are there generators or there is well, it is punishable by tara, but i have not already put it, now we will have such a small break, about 3:23 minutes, i will drink a little tea here, and then we will dive into international affairs and we will think about the european parliament and what is happening there well, you i think those who are interested in politics or diplomacy can guess what is happening there. but we have for you the wonderful serhiy lagodynskyi, who is the debate of the european parliament from germany, and he can explain to us what we should expect from our european friends. yes, i am anastasia.

reminded me, i forgot, i was in the studio exactly 9 years ago, well, in kyiv, yes, and it was at espresso that i really forgot, i’m somehow ashamed well, okay, they went to diplomacy there, further to europe, we have serhiy lagodynskyi, er, where will the councils of the european parliament be taken away from the federal government republic and we have a lot of questions for him, i will try to switch to the russian language, i think it will work for me, so far, probably the children will not be able to do it, hello, hello, hello again, i’m leaving. ask this in kyiv and in lviv, i think in kharkiv and odessa everywhere in ukraine they are discussing this, this is what

the russian federation is sponsoring terrorism, teodori zm . could do something against russia now, but they simply do not exist, and in order to start this procedure, you must first say that this is a sponsor of terrorism, this is what the parliament says, then it goes to the cabinet of ministers, there are already some institutions that are invented closing actions are broader, more accurate, and at some stage it becomes possible to bring russia to justice. do i understand correctly? well , approximately. in

relation to the european commission, the european council, what is it called, i.e., a member of the european union, eh, to develop, eh, in general , to say something about a heavy base by which it would be possible to judge which country is a country there, a terrorist was sponsored by a sponsor of terrorism, and what follows from this legal base . this is the process in relation to the russian federation, so this is how the request to the european commission would be, and how serious is it, how serious is it, and how serious is it ?

the commission will listen to ours because , in the field of international law, all of our resolutions of a recommendatory nature are already a matter for the european commission. indeed, the right of the plan is a very complex matter , but we have already decided now to express my opinion and say that from our point of view, two, two points, first, the russian federation uses terrorist methods in this war and the second one, she is a sponsor of terrorism, but look at the wagner brigade, or from my point of view, and the administration, in principle, of the donetsk luhansk oblasts, from my point of view, and it would also be such a

tourist regime and sergey, tell me, i think that if you came to kyiv or lviv, you would be criticized more strongly, both you personally and your colleagues, because the main words that are spoken here are that it is still necessary to prove, i understand that the institute is more important than voluntarism and this takaya well, how would i say takaya takaya, the specifics of the european union of european nations, that's all the matter is very detailed, very long, uh, how thoughtful it is, but the ukrainians ask, well , rockets fly and fall and kill further, that's what i just talked to the expert, i'm saying it's very interesting. i didn't know about it. i asked. and here's how it communicates. raids on civil civil

infrastructure somehow affect the ukrainian army. they say no. all armies of the world must be autonomous, so if they throw missiles at the army does not suffer ukraine, well, it suffers morally because there are women and children in the rear. but this is exactly terrorism - it is not people who fight against russia with weapons in their hands, it is people who sell bread . flu, i'm in lviv, in the theater, they sing here and so on, that's what else to whom, what would you answer to such people, first of all, i was in kyiv a week ago, eh, and eh, i'm like, well, almost dele. well how did they talk about this topic? it's a really complicated thing, secondly, it's mine uh, understanding here. it's clear. i voted for this

resolution, so i'm talking about how the majority of the members of the european parliament are oppressing, for us, it 's terror. yes, i don't know whether it's terrorism or not. well, it's terror, uh, in relation to uh, the population, from my point of view . attack there are even second categories, it is not necessary how to be, eh so that there is proof of terrorism, there are crimes against humanity, there are war crimes, they are all here, eh, absolutely from my point of view, without any questions, they are all from my point of view врения речь дёт дёт here i am alone for a long time, this is me at the beginning of another war, i say that this is, firstly, a war of destruction, secondly, this is aggression, that's the same, uh, the crime of aggression, yes, uh, and thirdly, it is naturally, uh, a crime against humanity and war crimes for different legal categories eh and from my point of view it is still a

national war we don't recognize it. yes, i recognize it. i don't recognize it относледует э-э well, all these crimes э-э while they were conducted by э-э some kind of tribunal, these tribunals were mainly э-э был после после страны, put how their country was, what kind of wife was э-э and here we have such a problem that how in general defeat the country with a given weapon and so on. i think that the ukrainians have a lot more to do with everything. yes, i don't know. will we be able to defeat and dismember and occupy it? to conduct some kind of city tribunal, you know, it is necessary to conduct it, as it were, without consent, yes, eh this is exactly the country that will appear, or the leader that will appear, as it were, virtually on the

dock . partners, i write this in every knitting because we would like to have a special tribunal, a special tribunal for the crime of war of aggression. yes, i don't know how it is in russian, it's war of creation. well, we are fighting to make an additional tribunal, and that is, i absolutely think that it does nothing for people who are now in such a terrible situation, therefore, from my point of view, the most important thing now is the supply of effective weapons. that's how we call this regime. i also secondarily need

it now. i always say that. i say that before the war , i am still in the chamber of this 3 to supply weapons to the ukrainian country , and what's more, not only against rockets, but also, for example, tanking the oparda and so on. далее это полициает меняет моей партия желеные, but unfortunately, eh , in principle, now the supplies have increased. well, yes, the tanks will not arrive in any way. another very important question of sergey. excuse me. also, about me, this is a person of interest. it's scary, but i don't remember what they say. 49 or 59 people who are against the resolution, they have some kind of argument. well, what do they say? ukrainians want to conquer russia and drop bombs on the urals, or what can they do? arguments when the whole world sees what is happening and suddenly there are people saying and we don't think that we think that this is wrong, this is the resolution that

they say, how am i, the argumentation which is natural, it will be a little bit more, they have changed such a line of argumentation, they were there . somehow, let's not escalate the situation, it's skalat, er, we need er, with er, putin , someday, after all, to enter into negotiations , etc. but i just have to now, he says that i should just see who it was, but i saw a picture of the entire hall being projected right after the vote. and you can see where the green ones that were for the addressee and the red one were on the sides, that is, everyone who voted against it was either right-wing radicals or left-wing ones, mmm. well, this is the same

collision that has always been enough to make everyone laugh at putin. it’s the same alternatives for germany, other eh or lefties, but i don’t want to be rude about it. says i need look at the lists of uh, specific ones, but most likely it was them, but there is also a second plast, it’s just a plast of people who, in principle, they don’t sympathize with putin, but they don’t understand that this is a matter of people’s survival or maybe they even understand, but they speak, but we have some kind of world order, peace order, law , and so on. this world order has no idea what it is in general, why vote for this, that is, how would it be here, uh, i understand them. yes, in the first case, in the

first category that was spoken there, morally, they are absolutely bankrupt . i think that for me personally, for my faction, also , which was brought out only for the recommendation to vote for which everything is important to us, morally important, to show that we understand who is engaged in torture here, he understands that it is necessary in this case to show solidarity the victims of this taro worked for this, it was political, how would it cost us, not legally , because we simply do not have a legal base, yes, thank you very much, sergey lagodinsky, a member of the european parliament from germany - these are the greens. i put them because i personally even remember my personal meeting with yoshka fischer, who happened to be a very popular leader in those

days, the 90s, the beginning of zero, well, that's how they tried to destroy it in the 20th century, ukrainians survived three famines in 1921-22, 1932-33 and 1946-47 . 1933 was a time of catastrophe that put the nation on the verge of extinction. this famine was not the result of a natural disaster of drought or crop failure, but was the result of a purposeful policy of the communist totalitarian regime. millions of people died then soviet the union tried to hide the truth about the committed genocide, we remember this sad date today in the realities of the new struggle for the survival of the ukrainian nation with a moment of silence to honor all ukrainians who died during the famine