who was elected there contrary to some previous procedures, when the candidacy of the patriarch was agreed upon by treason on matters of religion at the council of the minister of the soviet union with some minor official of some kasalapov kolupai who said who should be the patriarch of the russian church, and this was already not the case, and here i come to this church and i listen to what the priests are saying among themselves, the guy with the car is attacking, this is there. good people, the car will come out, there is such a car, and there is such a monetary one, and there they give such money, and there is such money, where do i have it? i'm standing and you know they're all in these beautiful cassocks, it's the same ceremony, even though the new patriarch is singing grace, and they are, you know, at some kind of trade union meeting in some kind of factory where people are just us, the prize is here now we have to go, that means stand up as i have always seen it there, of

course, they are not in church life, and i think. but how are these people supposed to accept confessions? they are supposed to teach something moral, something high, spiritual, and they are young in their heads, so the people are clearly a seminarian who is already graduates of the seminary, they are only thinking about how much money they will have, what kind of car they will have, what kind of people they will have, what they will be doing there, this is a russian church, by the way, i see practically at this very time, priests in the underground ukrainian greek catholic church who remained in this faith, despite the decades , these people are being persecuted, they needed parishioners, candles, machines, and all this pseudo-faith of this rpc church, and therefore, by the way, i have to tell you that real religiosity is somewhere on lands where there have always been such shepherds much higher than absolutely i would say

russian lands are far from faith in general, i believe that russians do not believe in god, they believe in a rite, as you know, like pagans, come to iconize yes bach bow run away and then go kill rob rape then vitaly came again, he conveys it so clearly, i still had an incredible, always such an emotion. i once went to the suburbs of moscow because i wanted to visit the dacha of the great russian writer mikhail tkavras , who wrote about nature, but what did he send to write about the fraud, he hated the bolsheviks and they hate russian shows in general, and he sat and wrote a diary all his life, where every day he wrote how i hate them, what the hell, they are bastards, they are murderers, they are bandits, they must all be destroyed, they destroyed russia . look here, here are five i don't remember about 10 such volumes, and at the same time it means when it means later

, uh, i put all this away, oh, birds sing, butterflies fly, the sun rises, what a beautiful russian nature. we are a t-shirt goldsmith such a bandit, i hate all of him, oh , wonderful cuckoo of the village, look at the twig, yes , seraphirenie and an egg, such a wonderful little one, oh , i hate these bolsheviks, they killed millions of people, bloody executioners, and that’s how they fed me, and i was wondering how a person lived who was in such a state all the time, everything you know your life, how it is, how it is, how these heroes are literary, who was in one, in two faces, i am a bakil, and i have not forgotten the name

of this british novel. well, if a person lives in such two hibastets well, i looked at the dacha more well, somehow he lived well, nothing like me, all the soviet writers and then next to it stands the new church and it turns out to be the russian church of the moscow patriarchate and some thief in law gave money for this church the bandit is completely on the construction of this church, and the attention is not devoted to christ. and here is one of the robbers who was next to him, well, where is he, this man is there, i don't remember now how it could even be. i tried to understand, i was standing like that tsentralna the figure of these churches, well, christ with his cross is somehow like this, and he is somehow like that well, like, what else, here are the people who suffered, but it is necessary on the cross well

, that is, he wanted the main character of his myth to be a bandit man there what was the idea of ​​​​the gospel in that people it was not jesus who asked for pardon, but this people, these people, who actually committed a real crime , unlike jesus, and made the video the main character of this temple, and the russian church, well , he brought his money, well, how, how, in some uh-uh, conventionally speaking, in cooking, what did you bring us done to you such a sandwich, jackie likhaide, the audience told me that thank you very much for the tip, yes, jackie likhaide, absolutely correct. so, eh, eh. in this regard, it was also an emotion for me. god, what kind of church is this? that is, you are any kind of sandwich, you are a troublemaker. bring money, please, this is such a bar, such a buffet, do you want a bandit well, we will glorify

yours, it will be give me money to have a car , they come to the candle, someone is going to this church now, and i also had such a story, and then there was a beautiful story about the patriarch kyryla oh, i have arrived to the yoke, and patriarch kirill was the patriarch of smolensk at the time, and to the yoke stands a beautiful historical church of white snow, one of the best churches of russian and sacred architecture even before the mongol times . very beautiful, very dilapidated there is something next to this church from a person who devoted his life and restoration he literally lives there in a small house near this church, and there he is being restored quietly and quietly. and what is the metropolitan saying? i am kirill, he is helping you. and this person is saying that the metropolitan is simply stealing all the money that does not give restoration. this church is absolutely calm, as if it should be so. well, please tell me what to expect from

gundyaev if he always stole. well, just a bandit, well, he put on himself abundantly on top of the meat a cross on top of christ . all are signs of patriarchal honor. but in fact they are ordinary thieves in law. and it is to him at the expense of the church that such should be dedicated. now he glorifies the video. what difference will it make if he has a monk? a monk. he is not mine at all . not he can write down nothing for himself, he can’t have a wife, he doesn’t have such and such cauldrons, he dresses like that, he went to the parishioners, to the pius on some yacht, well, he decided to mean by sea to such and such, it seems to be romana bramovych, i think that the novel damn voronovich, no, he's a bum, but it's strange, it's all strange. i think that's how russians

live in such systems, how to understand what's good and what's bad when you come to some places where you have to teach morals, and the father is some kind of thing. and you're generally normal as long as you stole well, i managed to steal it and how many women were raped in general when they were in ukraine, what a fool, a fool, at least your guys will be satisfied. what did you do there ? as always, you dealt with such a difficult topic with humor and explained it to us, we laughed. thank you mr. vitaly for this, let's move on to some serious topics, to another bandit , lukashenka, who has already directly threatened ukraine, saying that if you do not go to negotiations with the russian federation, you will completely destroyed. vitaliy, this is putin's message

, which he cannot personally voice. i think it is not surprising that lukashenko is doing this , because lukashenko's desire to kill is completely natural. he started doing it from the first day. how did he become the president of belarus ? it's just a great pleasure for a person who wanted to be the ruler of the whole of russia and manage everything only for belarus, this is if a huge comprehensive completeness, you know, we see lukashenko on television, i always say that i was aesthetic shock when i saw lukashenka in 1994 in reality, because he looks like you don't know how to insure such a person or a firecracker on the steppe. we are now even more . after all, it's a boy, and it's such a big thing with such a huge onion-like head, it's otaka, it's very big and it doesn't

fit on this fat body, and all the time, it seems that someone took an onion from somewhere, brought an onion to her eyes, and screwed the nose of it. her before that to some in order to be simply screwed by a person with the head of an onion horror, but again, horror, some kind of person from horror films there, just there, you are all concentration camps. my god, why are they going to go see him? he’s already like that, they did nothing . behind those mustaches, you're like santa claus. of course, he's a terrible person, but he looked absolutely like an old, er, grandfather of a mountaineer, and in zhirynovsky

, he looks like a person who ran away with er ends. and in this situation, er, lukashenka, too, i i think when he is there, the main thing is that his head is not cut off on a twig. you see, he has such a head, and it will also be possible to make an end chamber in belarus, just put what remains of him there and you will be able to earn money instead of reselling russian oil and showing it to tourists that for 30 years we have had such a puppet of the president , i wish someone would have done it sooner, but really, he is really saying something quite simple, he is not stupid . you lived under his rule in russia, russia will be for you, russia will be for you, or russia has bad

liquidity, how good, but now when he sees that you are so ungrateful, he has come to free you with the best army in the world, but they did not have time that all take refrigerators and toilets away from you and you are not satisfied. well, then he decides that he will destroy you all, or you agree to live under him and do what he says. and then he will drive you all out, make you cold, hungry. and everything else is what said lukashenko - in principle, this is a normal analysis, it's not even a warning, by the way, do you remember when to putin, i think it was in march or may, i have to look, i'm from that, the federal chancellor of austria, karl, is not a trader, remember, he was the only one with european the leader who then visited moscow trying to play some mediating mission and what did our grandfather dandelion volodymyr volodymyrovych tell him tell them that i will destroy them all what does this mean

in putin's language this is what he is doing now or when he said oh we haven't started anything yet what happened i mean, how many people said oh, he just says that, he just doesn't do anything. he meant it, we were going to destroy the state, that is, the institutions of the state wanted to be destroyed, and if you don't agree with the destroyed institutions, we will destroy the infrastructure. please tell me, and you. of course, your infrastructure is like that. well, this is terrorist logic, because if you take some hostages, they tell you that we will not talk to you. 10 well, then we will kill them invisibly , and we will take another 50 of you. you'll talk, give us money and a plane. well, we're debal, what's the name of this series in the paper house? well

, that's where everything is shown. it's the psychology of terrorists. now let's start with your son's finger. why don't you give money? you think we're terribly cruel and that's russian. logic, the west must understand that he does not feel sorry for the west, the west must understand that if he continues to supply weapons with this, we will destroy them all well, stop it, but putin already has no allies in this action except belarus and lukashenko directly. if we look even at the last one, that is dkb, that's already armenia. well, they have never before. koshenian expressed a certain opposition when russia did not provide assistance as an allied state in order to resolve the conflict with azerbaijan, but now he did not even sign this resolution as a result of this

what do you think about the outcome of this summit? does it play any role for putin or does he absolutely not care what happens inside the udc ? of course it pisses him off, but think about why nikola pashilyan would help afford not to sign a declaration in the dkb. really, look at all these people no one has ever elected putin the president for real. this is just a pseudo-choice. let him win the election now, where he received 73% of the votes in the diamond. true , as many as 24% of the population voted, but this is also the case, there are no competitors, rahmon, you rule jakistan for 30 years, the only people elected there are the presidents, the president of kyrgyzstan, who, as you remember, also refused to hold military exercises of the odkb on his territory, and the prime minister in

light of the problem. of the state, that is, pashinyan still draws attention to the armenian voters, to the armenian people, and therefore he may not allow to sign the documents to appeal to his people, you know, they do not support us and we will not sign this signature or they do not support us and we we can get out of there. this is a very interesting, very important point that needs to be said when you and i are discussing this whole situation, and it is absolutely obvious that in the situations that have developed in the relations between russia and the countries of the post-soviet space , all these countries that little by little, they are getting closer to some kind of dialogue with society. they are starting to behave completely differently. now, the new president of

kazakhstan began to try to talk with society and immediately distance himself from the russian federation . the question is kyrgyzstan and tajikistan, they have border wars with each other, but at the same time, they are both members of the csto. and why don't they come forward with some er, let's say, statements like er, never cats, why don't they help russia as an allied state and other states to resolve this conflict for them. why don't they oppose it? i think that it is precisely for these reasons that we are talking about, how much can they, in principle, pay attention to the citizens themselves, how much they can't, compared to armenia, they are absolutely not in dialogue with

of course, they are in dialogue with putin, and they may believe that, after all, without the understanding of putin, they cannot really stay in power, and this is what he threatened lukashenko with, by the way. imagine that russia loses the war. where are you all? will be, this is a good question, where will i be? lukashenko is a good question. it next time they may not elect him, they may elect him for a second term, putin did not recruit the president, he was in prison when there was another revolution

, he got out of prison and turned out to be a clever politician . he can also think that he can stay without putin, he has a sisinpinu, the main one is said to be the tokayev couple elected, you can say that there are no final results, but he got more than 80 percent of the votes, well these are not competitive elections. it is clear. in any case , one way or another, he is trying to appear to politicians who think about the national interests of kazakhstan. he is proposing reforms. well, it is difficult to say how it will all look one way or another. i believe that the situation is related to the post-soviet space, it

will be you can see the rapid change in the president of azerbaijan aliyev. he said that he does not want negotiations with armenia because he does not like the fact that the armenians are being dragged into the negotiations by the french president of france. but this is a new absolutely format, they are arguing about it where france, the european union, azerbaijan and armenia. by the way , the president of azerbaijan is not against the participation of the head of the european council in charles michel, well, that is, they are ready to talk without putin, and by the way, as soon as they started talking without putin, it immediately turned out that they can talk about something to negotiate , some progress in the conflict, which has been going on for 30 years, actually began, but the main thing i always say is that everyone says that the main reason for this conflict is the mutual hatred of the azerbaijani and armenian people. okay, how this hatred arose, it is not russia over there. yes, these borders are a pitchfork so that you know this hatred at any moment

if you make some construction and know for sure that if you click here it will fall here, that is, of course you can use any such construction in order to simply attack each other and they may even not even remember the first reason, they simply have already gone through a catastrophe in one step, by the way, tokayu, he also leads a policy of attack, which is contradictory, but regarding the a-a war of russia against ukraine, even more can be said in support of ukraine because he speaks for the territorial integrity of these states, he said publicly under putin that he will not recognize the lpr, the dpr, and all other entities because he considers it right, then there will be chaos in the world, by the way, he did not recognize the new regions which russia annexed by a pseudo-referendum to these four ukrainian

regions, you know, when kazakhstan was declared an independent state, the kazakhs did not constitute an independent state in the majority of the population, now the situation has changed for the better, but at the moment the declaration of statehood kazakhs were half of the population, but i am not sure that it was 51% . president nazarbayev at that moment was afraid to even declare independence because he believed that this independence could lead to the disintegration of kazakhstan. from the first day after the declaration of independence, he began to say that it is necessary to create a union of northern states. i remember that he gathered journalists at the embassy of kazakhstan in russia for a press conference and said that i proposed to create a union of independent states and now i i'll read how my colleagues reacted and it turned out that

all of his colleagues were against it. well, it's clear. and i tell him after that, it's going to be a side anniversary, you 're doing it, you want to build kazakhstan on your own sovereign state. as far as i understand, he tells me, and how can i calm down my own russian population, how can we use it to explain that, in principle, we are not against them, we explain to them that we ourselves want a new union, which you and russia do not want, your president, the president of kazakhstan proposes a union, and your russian president is such a russian, as you do not want with for you to be in the union with you and the russians means that you have no alternative but to live in kazakhstan or go to russia. if you don't want to and this policy, it basically won because it was such a policy. no one needed it, but the fear of this

broken person remained with all the people who passed , entered politics together with nashitan, let's make goats already, marta is high just like that, just like that person, and he can believe that sooner or later the russians will use this goat against him because he can recognize the dpr lpr recognized the dpr dpr this is a direct road highway to the ural people's republic by the way i was already considered a protégé of non-zrybaeva, but since when in january it seems last year there were protests now and then kaiv expelled even himself non-zrybaeva from the territory of kazakhstan they then think that in they have their own interests, they don't pay attention to you anymore, this is a serious lesson for any dictator, but it is obvious that in this situation it creates more fear of russia, all its troops have come, people have left, the new president would not have to

and russia with his power, how will he act, that's why he needs to distance himself. do you understand that the attitude to war in kazakh society is contradictory in kazakh society, there are people who are resolutely against the war, there are people who essentially support what russia is doing - these are primarily the viewers of russian tv channels, primarily the russian population if it is supported by the war, the logic of this war is that where russian people live, russia should be there, then it is those people who oppose the war that is beginning to be projected onto the republic of kazakhstan itself, and it is beautiful understands that he has faced the most crisis situation in all the years of the existence of the kazakh state, so i don't know how he will get out of it. by the way, i will tell you how he can get out of this normally if ukraine wins in russia, this is a reality mr. vitaly one last time

let 's go let's talk about the fact that germany is initiating a meeting of the head of the foreign ministry of the group of seven in order to solve the issue with the energy system of ukraine, we have just here and the light just went out and it's good that we have a generator and we can continue broadcasting, but not everyone has such an opportunity. of course, this is a huge disaster for all ukrainians, but i wonder, mr. italy, why do they have regular meetings in order to solve some problems? they clearly know what we need in order to stop russian attacks by military means please give us anti-e missile and anti-air means, and we will solve it ourselves. it is not so easy, as long as it is given about rotors, anti-missile anti-e air means can destroy already 50% of our infrastructure, and in principle, i believe that such meetings are needed, when is this meeting of the minister of foreign affairs, a meeting of energy ministers,

they can imagine a whole set of measures that , in principle, do all this destruction not without meaningful, here are some generators, some e-e mobile stations, some money for repairs, reconstruction of infrastructure, some where and the supply of electricity, i don’t specialists, the question is because there is a specialist, but the main thing is to demonstrate to putin that his attempts to turn ukraine into a cold desert do not end with anything, this is the idea. he wants for the population to suffer because it is in his mind that if the population suffers, it will destroy zelenskyi and i will immediately say the new government, let's capitulate to russia, where can we get this power and it can only be brought from moscow, as you know, it is not clear, but there is such an idea and we need to develop it. i believe that we have to win on two fronts, on the military and not on the energy side, that we should not allow a situation, and precisely with the help of our allies, when ukraine, not ukrainians, will die

and suffer in connection with any infrastructure , we need operational measures that can understand how much population do we need to resettle from some areas where it is impossible to provide heat and water, its gas is domestic. this may also require aid money. we need an understanding of whether there is a point in the new departure of people abroad and how they will be received there and what these temporary conditions will be perhaps for the time of the winter months, if people live peacefully in their cities and they can return there in march-april, so that we are talking about such a short-term early departure, and this can also be a procedure. that is, it is possible to adopt a whole a complex of measures that will nullify all russia's actions in this regard. i think it should be enough. it is important that the issue of preserving the power system will not be resolved by military means, but purely by discussing equipment, monetary aid, financial aid, which is really very funny to us, the war can continue for a long time

and during this time, the population that lives in the state must survive this war so that it does not turn out that we won in russia and there is no one left here, you know, there was such a popular polish film about a famous polish spy in the 39th year who beat or just perfect and the last frame of this film that he completely won and stands and watches as german tanks enter warsaw. what is the meaning of such a victory, the victory must be complete. that is, you win at the front and you know that you have a population in the rear that survived. and if you won and behind you is the desert so what are you going to do with this desert so it should be a double set of measures to ensure the life of the civilian national if the state that is fighting against us angelik is doing everything possible to destroy the civilian population in essence fights with women and children, this is the same reality as a terrorist organization, it is necessary to create a

complex of decent measures. it is this terrorist organization that is absolutely sure that this is the right meeting . we see in the dark what are the russians well, and then there is a bad word that cannot be said on the air, but i think everyone understood what we are talking about if the ukrainians are indomitable, we hold on. congratulations, thank you for the air, vitaliy portnikov of the polish evening program, we will meet soon and in a few moments, iryna koval will tell you the news