yes, it’s bad there now, but there i just see that the only option is to hold on and do all the redeployment of forces, there are few relatives, just huge losses and in principle it was good, in fact, it seems that the russians always have to do it. and if it is done for the benefit of a prepared position, they lose over it a large number of people, even if they have some course of 500 m in six months, this is actually good news. because if they didn't break there, they would have gone somewhere else where it is possible to defend themselves, because everything is much less convenient, so yes, because bakhmut now fulfills the same role as a shield. and here, in my opinion, there are no uh genchers here, there are no universal weapons that they will give us, we will grab them now. they will throw him, we just have to hold them . time e-e russia-1

khodakovsky said that in principle the goal is so general, it is to advance, well, to cover bakhmut as e-e was covered at one time mariupol and then, as he said, to disassemble quarter by quarter, this is essentially the destruction of the city of bakhmut as such, i.e. to what extent this danger is generally close yes yes then the answer is simple regardless of whether there is a picture or not how close this danger is that it can be

covered and this is how the destruction of the city will begin. i don't feel that i said or heard what i said or heard. unfortunately, i said that the idea of ​​the russians is to do the same as they did near mariupol , that is, to cover the city from two sides and then simply quarter by quarter to analyze it, how close is this danger to bahmut and how much can this happen in principle because they want to stand there, i want to have a suitable advance in the vicinity they still haven't covered it yet and here we are talking about mariupol, which, i will remind you, just held on in an absolutely complete siege for several months, of course , the bahmuts and the opel set are not that big in terms of geographical indicators and demographics, but so far this is not the case, so far duhvke has voiced only his feelings, except that they are ideal we would try to do uh, uh, taking into account their advancement and the advancement of ukrainians there. in other

directions, we can already take the brain with any success, except for this plan, uh, it will finally succeed, but again, everything can be dynamic here. that is, it can change in another moment, they can just go ahead and have more success, but so far nothing indicates that. well, i see that mr. alexander has joined us . mr. alexander, let's continue with you what we tried to say about countering the russians. this location from your point of view, what can we do there in this location, what else, in fact, are the armed forces of ukraine at this particular location, they implement defense tactics of an exclusively defensive

nature . to increase the presence of formations whose formations carried out not only defensive actions, but also rejected the enemy and went precisely to the counteroffensive, but for today, in my opinion, it is very realistic because we have higher priorities directions and bridgeheads on which we can conduct more successful contour offensive operations, therefore, in the near future, this entire situation near bakhmut will be concentrated exclusively on the defense of tactics in support of a position with an overview sense, for example, e-e support was prepared by fire energy systems, although this makes it quite difficult to use precisely because of the saturation of civilian objects in this location, but on the other hand, the psychotropic impression of the russian units of the

russian occupiers. we can do it, we see that we are implementing it precisely because of the rather high level of their inhibition, precisely because of the inhibition of their advancement, well , in fact, as i said, the situation has been difficult for more than six months, which says a lot , i.e., the present russians’ ticket capture of this very city. it is these locations in the future the situation will not change, it seems to me, until the first quarter of 2023. well, when you say to increase ours there, you mean to increase the ukrainian group itself, that is, the number, well, composition, or somehow artillery to increase armored vehicles. well, something like that. what do you mean? if we are talking about defensive actions, then to increase again the number of

artillery. both passively and reactively, if we are talking about offensive actions, then the increase of units that take part in assault actions, offensive actions er, these are tank units, these are other assault groups, and so on. wait for what kind of change, i understood. and tell me, in principle, it’s near there. well, the russians are also making attempts to attack the bilogerka. if i’m right there. if there was a map, it would be possible to look at it. well, it’s not quite nearby. it is also related to an attempt somehow from afar, or is it more related to an attempt to somehow improve the situation by criminalizing it

? it is possible to understand victors, it is primarily a threat specifically for of lysichansky north donetska, the main walkie-talkies of the borderline curve, that's why it looks very threatening to them, it's like a springboard for a further counteroffensive of the armed forces in this direction, it's clear . success as well. in principle, to what extent can we expect any intensification of actions there? well, it seems to me that in the north, everything is better for the ukrainians of the armed forces. of course, they are trying to

actively tax them. they are pursuing the battle, they still have resources and reserves, but i don't think it will make a difference there. well, simply and in principle, it is not very convenient there. the fifth element to act, so i think rather. after all, he will repeat a certain surpriston success, you know, i propose to talk about such an aspect eh well, at the moment there is a lot of talk, first of all, about eh air defense patriot- patriot, what eh, someone there then promises , then they say that no, it is impossible, then someone supplies it to taiwan, although it also seems like it was impossible er, hmm, on the other hand, er, well, in general, er, there were statements by nato that they would strengthen the ukrainian ppp

, oleksandr . it was about the supply of some new or reinforcement of what is a weapon, uh, what kind of weapon would we have, uh, well, we would like to receive a reinforcement of our anti-aircraft defense, and what exactly would it be desirable for us to get in the first place in order to really change the situation with shelling and with the russians ' ability to attack our infrastructure facilities is different there we must understand that the strengthening of our anti-aircraft defense is not only a complex of some one type of some one nomenclature of the small radio judge of the medium radius, then of the large radius, that is, which provides us with a full-fledged echeloned

tpo of high-tech high-tech in the new morning and here are such complexes as for example irish people on the very crotal asp they cooperate very well with each other precisely creating this echeloned ash and if we are not talking about the detective, then there is also me doubts about providing ukraine with this missile in the near future. it is a very good thing that has already appeared. the trc is sanctions in italian. and it has a radius of action, the distance of the objects is up to 120 km, and the most interesting thing is that it is aimed at the destruction of ballistic missiles . objects, and in the near future we may have problems precisely with ballistic objects, because it is not yet known for certain whether russia has received

ballistic missiles from iran, whether they will receive them or not. here is the most important question of the near future: do they have this resource? therefore, it is precisely the transition of the complex type that will also be beneficial to us, and if even the dna is the first ot thus , we will not be given a request for sanctions to the french and italian e-e leadership , and on this course we must press precisely on this aspect that opposes ballistic e- e complexes are needed in ukraine just like everyone else, well, you know. in principle, i think that right now, they won’t provide it, but in principle, it’s a matter of ideas. someday it will come to that, but it could happen, for example, in six months

ah, how much faster can the issue with those french complexes that you mentioned just now be resolved? well, really, the problem of protecting our airspace and strikes on our energy critical infrastructure is that they accelerate these events, accelerate them much, and these bureaucratic processes are happening faster than before at the very beginning of the resolution, the party to ukraine , that is, this terrorist threat from the russian occupiers, it still helps to solve the issues that were previously convincing in the first place to quickly provide us with all the complexes but if we are talking directly about sanctions, depending on the speed of decision-making, we can receive them, for example, in the first quarter of

2023 . then you still have to learn from a teacher. crew of operators is actually 3-4 months a-a basic skills and sometimes even more, but our international partners have repeatedly emphasized that a-a military service all of the armed forces of ukraine, they are planning new equipment much faster than they could even imagine , and our partners themselves, that's why the pace, especially when we talk about operators with a crown. we are talking about crews who are familiar not only with soviet models from interactive complexes. i already i was familiar with the air defense systems of nato standards, and they can

master this or that system in the shortest possible time, really depending on its inclination, but here is the meaning that precisely in the western samples are modern samples of all a-a military-technical equipment, and they they are very favorable in order to master them as soon as possible, they do not cause any problems in mastering. as old soviet e equipment, they are available both in the interface and in some other aspects of technical and other viktor. well, look at these conversations in general and about, well, statements about the possibility of supplying petri, then the statement of the minister of foreign affairs of latvia regarding the fact that ukraine should be able to strike at the bases of russian weapons, and this is for a moment the

caspian sea, so if you are serious which is shooting at ukraine, is medvedev's answer, well , regarding the fact that if the patriot is delivered, then we will have the right to destroy it, haha, as if they do not destroy everything else, is there anything at all ? i would like to believe that we are on the verge of some kind of change in the dynamics of the war in general, in terms of the approach to the war on the part of our allies. but honestly, not yet, not very well. asked to give us something for this maybe, although i honestly don’t know what we can theoretically consider targets in the caspian sea. that’s why tomahawks, as far as i know, are they in the

version itself, or have they been proven to me, and in the sea we ca n’t use them, so i don’t know what to take and here we are talking about although definitely the same complexes that would be at least 500 km away this is the most perstian sea but it would also be very good it was also at least it would give the opportunity to respond to the russians for their overpowering of the infrastructure with something at least roughly symmetrical er-er when it appeared that what hits at least up to the suburbs of moscow, i have already roughly changed the situation and it would be good, but again, it does not depend on us, on the political will of our partners in the political party . well

, but nevertheless, look, well, what, in general, what else can there be, besides, apart from air defense, what can be means of impression, which, well, because air defense is protection first of all, but what about er, means of impression about what possible offensive weapon we could be talking about and if our allies, well managed to understand that we should wait for the destruction of the entire infrastructure of ukraine. well, you know, this is a counter-productive way of waging war in principle . well, we are talking about, first of all, about various means of defeating the long arm. rockets are the first thing, and secondly, we are talking about what is more specifically about aviation, on the one hand, they are being discussed, as it were, at 16, on the other

hand, there recently appeared some sulfate about 39 swedish chuvaks, it would also be not bad. because in reality, if we were somehow able to equalize the situation in the air, at least in certain areas, it would be of great help to the ukrainians , but we need to liberate the territory, and this is seriously within our power. of course, it will not protect the energy infrastructure, but it will greatly help the course of the war in general to create there to play in ukraine, and there is currently a discussion in general about what kind of aircraft would make sense because there is a statement about what to provide there, it seems

could er, well, some could in short, i can’t for- i don’t want to say now, i don’t remember exactly the nomenclature er, but er, as far as i know, it’s not a very good option and at least they don’t decide on any prices for us er- well, no such significant preferences will be given, but on the other hand, there is a statement from the representative of our air command and hnat, who said that it would be better if they provided us with a new nato aircraft, some new aircraft, and he even named which one actually what would you like said about this discussion that would make sense if the speech it would be about airplanes, well, the discussion about airplanes has been going on for quite some time now, it’s actually not even since 2022, as early as 2021 they were talking about the actual renewal

of the air forces of the armed forces of ukraine and which airplanes we need, which fighter jets, there were a lot of versions, and there were constructive and non-constructive discussions, and even then in the 21st year, it seems to me that a fighter plane that is so effective for our airspace or a fest 15x is, in my opinion, because this is an aircraft that was specifically made for operational actions in mind in the airspace, and in fact , the airspace of ukraine should be considered for our e-e planes, for our pilots, as enemy airspace because it contains, for example, e-e air defense complexes of the enemy, which was updated according to the russian occupiers both at that time and today ask them it is the fastest aircraft in its class in the world with the largest load

of weapons that there is no well no aircraft and it also has operating systems operating system with the largest computable this is the largest fast computable element and process that is it positions are even better than the f-35, but again, it was in 2021, now the reality is completely different, and therefore ukraine can take into account there, first of all , the provision of soviet-type aircraft to us, they have 29, for example, in the first place and after i am sure that we will receive them and in the near future, and it may also be f16, one of, if not the latest, if not the

oldest, modifications in order to carry out, as conditions, more support for the contour of the offensive house to the armed forces of ukraine, and maybe it is not the best, because there is a discussion about the provision of a10 uh bolt but this is an attack aircraft that has also proven itself very well during its use. but again , today we must understand that support for the armed forces of ukraine can only be provided at the expense of support from a safe distance for the pilots, not only from the pilots, but from the very machine of the aircraft itself and assault aircraft in this case it is earlier than m-16 in them 29 well, if we are lucky, probably not even in 15

well, the main thing here is that it should not be done again after some, well, negative for us changes on the front because uh, now uh, russian planes well, the last such uh, this week there was also a message, there was no such thing for a long time, and now ours again shot down the su-25s on duty there, which flew carelessly to the front line, closer to the front line but in general, well, that is, the russians cannot fly so directly without karno in our space, they shoot from afar. how dangerous it is in general, the story with this probing of the pp, what victor will tell you, is not very dangerous. i think that it

is . therefore, let's say so here for now and where there is mutual restraint on both sides and i don't see that this situation will directly change dramatically without any changes, the russians will not grow anya , a new day is like that, and not ukrainian pilots can to appear from the opposite side for a visa, but this is not a matter of the next few days. i have to apologize a lot, i have a bit of work here, i should have checked out 5 minutes earlier, so i really wish everyone the best of luck next week, could we talk about something good, but for now it should be unlocked, good viktor, then good luck to you well, alexander, we have

a couple of minutes left. ago well, the russians have a large stockpile of aviation weapons and, in principle, they have, um, well, let’s say that the temptation to use it is so great, so far they cannot do it to a sufficient extent, but how does it threaten us? ah, the summer scenarios are really tricks, ah, we see precisely about the massed missile strikes on the territory of ukraine that they differ from each other. and that is, if on october 10 it was a strike with the use of a large number of missile weapons precisely different nomenclature with different

characteristics, then it was already used exclusively a-a one nomenclature - these are aviation missiles gas 101 unified they used but then we already saw other scenarios when they used huskies one with let's say without combat unit a exclusively with its imitation that is, it was a missile diverting our heat, and it was these missiles that already followed with combat units, that is, they diverted them, they exhausted them stupidly, and already when popov was exhausted, they made about them our defense and these various scenarios they use only in order to, by the way, in the conditions of the existing shortage in them , to the fact that they have run out of missiles no, they will never run out, namely in conditions of shortage in

order to constantly create such massive strikes every day, they do not they can do it, they can do it only because of some fuels after they restore their ammunition a-a and to use it as efficiently as possible. these are the possibilities they and er implement certain scenarios that reveal the weak spots of our turbo a the strongest in their place and they will always be something news, and i will say yes, our true air defense our forces are also adapted to these constant changes and they are constantly modifying and modernizing it. let's say so ... really eh. nevertheless, somewhere there is still an imbalance due to the possibility of using missile weapons against our russian territory. the occupiers were not able to achieve, well, in fact, their main

goal. they did not mix our heat. they did not completely destroyed our critical infrastructure, they are not successful in this with strikes in the war zone, they cannot change this situation, well, that is, thank you oleksandr kovalenko, our time has run out on the air . of the armed forces of ukraine and i really hope that the next week will bring us some more positive news than this one. for now, we have a sufficiently tense situation both on the field in bakhmut and actually in air well but nevertheless we i think that we we can accept this challenge and we will withstand it thank you congratulations now i will tell about the

incredible story of the search for the missing girl and this story that ultimately ended with a happy ending once again proves that thanks to our joint efforts with you really it is possible to search for missing boys and girls. so we are talking about seventeen-year-old nastya okopova, who was found after a long seven- month search. we are actually very happy that we can now say for sure that nastya she was found and everything is fine, moreover, the girl sent us a video confirming that she is alive and well and is already at home with her parents , everything is fine with me, i am alive and well, my family and i have been back home to our home town of izyum for about a month now, what can't help but rejoice, they are doing lviv, thank god, but you can't say that about the city,

walking through the streets, you can immediately see that the place suffered a lot from the war, it's not the place where we lived for seven months, i told you about how the search for the girl was going, and i remind you that nastya disappeared at the beginning of april in izyum, kharkiv region, when there was heavy fighting there, at the same time the connection with the girl was cut off, nothing was known about her fate, and nastya's friend katya turned to us for help in the search. she then asked to show this appeal to nastya if i i really hope you see this message, i'm very worried about you because it 's already been the fourth month without you and i'm very worried about you, your family, sashka, so please, just if you can get in touch, i 'll tell you that you're alive, what's wrong with you there is food, drinking water, there are clothes and you still have a roof over your head that everything is fine with you. please just come