of the spiritual leadership from moscow, as we can see , the moscow patriarchate does not want to rename it, nor to give up its spiritual center in the country of the aggressor, they supposedly held a so-called meeting there in april, they called it a cathedral. but again, their cathedral, which has the right to change the charter, has only patriarch kirill has the right to convene, that's why they are in such a strange situation that they can't, they don't have the right to convene this council. apostates or not uh, in no way because i saw their newly registered their fresh charter in this charter they simply camouflaged their affiliation to the moscow patriarchate behind a few sentences but when you decipher these sentences it is clearly written in them that the ukrainian orthodox church is part of the russian orthodox church churches because in their charter they referred to the charter of the moscow patriarch from

1990, when you open the charter of the moscow patriarch it clearly says украинская православная церковь и сейчас у русской of the orthodox church, so if they tried to camouflage it, well, so to speak, the needle is in the bag. you can't hide it, and the point remains unequivocal that, unfortunately, this non-canonical organization remains a part of the moscow patriarchate. they have a single law. sinful land and i decided, so to speak, to pop half a branch from the shovel, i.e., to christen it, it burned, it burned for one clear moment, and i for the next . few want to complete the opinion or let's talk about property quick comment they have the only legal way to become a canonical orthodox church

articles part of the economic church to join the ruslans of ukraine other and other tumblers don't work in ukraine so about property let's talk state property reserves we understand one key reserve kyiv kyiv -pechersk lavra, so what was being built, so to speak, nemos, not by the moscow patriarchate, give it, i wanted to. assumption lavra we also understand that it was founded on the lands and so on at the time when it was the ukrainian orthodox church subordinated directly to constantinople, then constantinople established us and, accordingly, now it is property that is de facto and de jure it belongs to the entire ukrainian people is in the hands of the same structure, such a strange disproportion, in

fact, this property and monuments of architecture and historical monuments belong one hundred percent to the state, the moscow patriarchate disposes of them exclusively by right free of charge, and according to the fact that many of these religious organizations, in particular, the so-called religious organization called the brothers of the pechersk lavra, which repeatedly violated the agreements on e-e with memorial monuments, the state has every right to terminate the agreement on the planet, this is the first in accordance with the fact that in 2018 this religious organization systematically violates the requirements of the law to bring its statutes in line with the law , that is, to clearly state that it is the russian orthodox the church, they don't do that, so the state has the right to remove their charters from registration, if

following the registration, yes, their e-e agreements for the lease of premises for the lease of architectural monuments are null and void, the state now has every chance , there is every possibility, in fact, to finally deprive the lease and the occupation of spiritual e-e architecture, but we see that in fact in the ministry of culture, and the minister of culture is the main person e whose right it is to fulfill these e-e requirements of the law e obviously, the ministry of culture is not political will or she is interested and at home to finally bring this issue to an end because the minister of culture regularly writes sorry about the fact that he can do nothing, he is not responsible for anything well, then a logical question arises, why is such a minister of culture if he does not want to fulfill the requirements the law is of course very interesting to you. thank you, mr. andriy , both for your service and for participating in the live broadcast of the espresso tv channel - andriy kovalev, a historian from

petlyuriv , an active officer of the armed forces of ukraine. the world recognition of the holodomor in ukraine as a genocide of the ukrainian people only last week, the governments of romania, ireland, moldova, and the opposition to belarus adopted relevant decisions. berlin for at least the last 8 years, in 2019, accordingly, the petition on the website of the bundestag received the necessary 50,000 votes. however, the german deputies were in no hurry to name many reasons, but the main one there was a reluctance to annoy the putin regime and to cover up with legal case studies throughout these denials, they are from the sly berlin is indirectly co-responsible for the crime of

famine when grain was forcibly taken from ukrainian peasants, it was the soviet union in 1932 that became germany's main trading partner. on november 30, the german parliament finally decided to consider this issue in the draft resolution, the deputy will propose to put the holodomor in the same row as the holocaust, after the visit to the german president frank of walter steinmeier, volodymyr zelensky asked him to contribute to the establishment of historical justice with the same request. zelensky also addressed the prime minister of britain. decision-making is important right now, when the kremlin is once again carrying out acts of genocide against ukrainians, but this topic needs to be worked out in detail, and it is likely that justice will be ensured. the british government has not yet recognized the holodomor as a genocide because this crime was committed long before 1948, when the un approved the convention on the prevention of genocide in london, they say that

international law does not have retroactive force in israel they do not want to recognize the holodomor as genocide because they consider the tragedy of the holocaust to be unique turkey also avoids this topic because it itself is accused of the mass destruction of armenians at the beginning of the 20th century, as of today more than 20 countries have recognized the holodomor as genocide, including the united states , poland, the baltic states brazil and australia last week such a decision was adopted by the parliaments of moldova, romania and ireland. i would like to thank my colleagues for this extremely concise but informative and generally honest story on an extremely difficult topic, we are now attracting to our marathon serhiy, an honest german political scientist, an expert on eastern europe, the head of the representative office of the heinrich böll foundation, we congratulate you, mr. serhiy, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, and the former head of the hannik foundation to the 21st year in

i have worked in ukraine, now i no longer work in kandybiolat. well, let's hope that soon you will return in a couple of years to a position in the hyding foundation, so, in any case, congratulations your history is extremely difficult, we would like to ask you, of course, about the internal german debate regarding the recognition of the holodomor as genocide, it is about germany, we understand that germany has certain phobias of its own, germany has crushed the huge traumas of history and very often it is afraid to blow on water, but as if the case of the holodomor was a stalinist communist crime, just an apocalyptic crime is so obvious that there would be no such debate, in your opinion, what is the specificity of german, well, look, first of all, it must be said that uh during the unsystematic nine months, we have been witnessing a tectonic shift in the german

political debate, that tonight, at 6:00 german time, that is, kyiv time, the bundestag will vote on the issue of recognizing the holodomor as genocide and most likely, the majority will vote in favor of recognizing that this is something that was completely unimaginable a year ago, that such attempts were made two years ago, three years ago, a certain circle of deputies and representatives representatives of the political landscape, let's say marilo izabek, a former deputy of the green party, they tried to promote this idea and the bundestag refused. that is, there was a huge position, including from the side of the democratic party, not including from the christian democratic union that is, the big parties were against

determining that today no one questions the fact that the holodomor was a genocide and that it must be recognized yesterday literally in the berlin cathedral, this is the main cathedral of berlin, protestant was like an economic service in which representatives of the catholic church and the ukrainian orthodox church participated and a representative of the jewish community in berlin and there was a memorial service in honor of the victims of the holodomor and there were representatives of all major political parties and everyone honored the memory yes, sir, but the question is still legal from the legal point of view, whether the german deputies will dare to vote. i think that i think that i will vote. i think that they will vote. ukrainian than even then the actions of the german government, do you

remember when in april there was a photo about whether we should supply weapons to ukraine? there, almost all the deputies of the right-wing coalition and almost all the deputies of the largest opposition party, the hds, voted that there were delays in the supply. weapons is another matter, but the bundestag voted simply, well, 99% of those from whom we expected them to vote, they voted only for two radical parties, the right, the radical adn and the left, the radical left, they did not vote, all the others voted, so here i have no doubt that the vote will be positive for the history of ukraine, and the question is what consequences it will have for the political process, because in fact , it will not have any direct consequences for russia, but it will add a very positive movement to the discussion about genocide what is happening right now on the territory of ukraine because there will be a clear parallel to

what russia is doing today in ukraine, the displacement of agricultural land, the destruction of farmers, and they want to freeze it coldly, they killed many civilians, we understand that, unfortunately, they do not abandon their intentions to complete their great crime, which has all the signs of genocide. this is not an exaggeration. it's a pity, but apart from this extremely important symbolic story, we have to understand that there is no less interesting domestic german politics, but khrystyna yatskiv and i looked at each other like this well, i saw it in the eyes of the name steinmayer, and

frank walter steinmeier's germany has a certain reputation. let's say it's because of the experience we have in connection with the formulas he once offered us, and let's be honest, many ukrainians are very skeptical of them. less now, the president of germany, mr. steinmeier, in principle, is completely changing, i would say so, he is changing his rhetoric, he rejects the idea of ​​a ceasefire in ukraine, which will give russia a break, our viewers very often see sergey we are asked about the actual position of the president in germany, we understand how authoritative she can be and how much she is and can be a tuning fork both for society and for the political community as a whole, the only question is how much everything is synchronized now and how much stein mayer in general re broadcasts what in general,

german policy is going to do this again. well , first of all, i want to agree with the fact that from the recognition of the genocide of the holodomor to the recognition of today's genocide of the russians, the step has decreased, i.e. thanks to the fact that the holodomor will be recognized today, it will be easier to recognize that what the russians are doing today is genocide, that i agree completely, that it fully corresponds to the signs on this, that is enshrined in the un convention on the prevention of genocide, here is your question about mr. steinmeier, looking from one side pshe does not have a very big influence on politicians because he is purely formally legal, in fact he checks the laws only as the president on their a-and that means on their responsibility of the constitution in the main law and if they answer, he signs them and, in principle, this is where his authorized representative ends. other appointments of judges to officers of the state award are purely formal reports, but on the other hand, of

course, there is a great moral authority and his statements regarding the political process to them to them they are addressed and listened to, but simply, well, steinmeier is not such a handsome uncle in glasses, we understand that he represents those circles that until recently were considered moderate pro-russian because they were tied to russian energy resources. let's be honest . yes, it is a very important moment for the chancellor of germany, olafsholz, that he still listens to the opinion of angela merkel, who so far in her rhetoric insists that i was right at the time when i made the relevant decisions. and here is what we are talking about the current the chancellor's position, after all, who is closer to the president's position or to the position of his predecessor. i think that scholz has

his own position and his position. in terms of tactics, she is close to the dead, that is, to sit and do nothing and waiting until then means the problem will disappear on its own regarding steinmeier. steinmeier really got out of the circle. schrüder and steinmeier were a scumbag's assistant for a long time and he relatively had very friendly relations until recently. so i think that steinmeier has now changed his rhetoric precisely because of that that at the beginning of this war he was very actively criticized precisely in germany and he was reminded of his openly pro-russian stance in recent years, and he drew conclusions from this and adjusted his rhetoric to this criticism regarding the scholtz, the scholtz is sitting waiting for something when it will end and something this person about whom says that he votes last after he looks at a clear circle and sees how everyone voted, this is his modus operandi - this is how he worked for years, uh, merkel's position that came

out this week in an interview in the sandbox in which she said that she supposedly did everything right well, even in germany, she is now so suspicious and people look at her so surprised. that is, we can say that, in principle, the political establishment is at the level of the chancellor the former chancellor of the president, they are more like this, they do not keep up with the development after the development of german society because german political society and german society in general it is more pro- minded than many representatives of the government, this is such a paradox, mr. serhiy, we asked about moods in the german elites, well, the key story for us is probably with khrestina yatskiv, it is the possible transfer to us of the hypothetical patriot systems that germany promised to transfer to poland, and poland offered the answer showed its gentlemanly readiness

to hand over these systems to us. do you think germany will dare to take such a step? i think it is possible , i do not rule it out. of course, for germany, this is a classic problem that germany never wants to be the first. germany does not want massively in something if we were to stick it in without the other nato countries doing it, if there is a lot of pressure on germany from the side of other partner countries in nato and poland, as it is now, poland will do it, because it will insist that these systems be located, let's say, in the western regions of ukraine on the border with poland, and they defended it from russian missiles and ukrainian territory. i think that in the end there will be no arguments in germany to deny it, but it takes time, that is, as we see, germany always responds to challenges

but with a delay that, for example, is absolutely exhausting for me because this delay is really a cost to ukraine, the life of the territory, damage to the destruction of cities, and other damages. what is russia causing? participation in the live broadcast of the espresso tv channel serhiy soumleni, a german political scientist, an expert on eastern europe, the former head of the representative office of the heine hubbell foundation, well, now we are going to analyze the military situation in our country and the statements of which european high-ranking officials, what will we surely start with oleg katkov, chief editor of defense express olezhe is in touch with us. congratulations, glory to ukraine. well, there was probably a bit of a barbell in the statement of the head of the european commission, mr. von der leyen, regarding the losses of our country in the military sense and in the sense of the civilian population. this statement has already been removed from social networks

and we understand that it was most likely based on the latest data from mark emilia, who oriented everyone in the world to approximately the same numbers , here it is really important to clarify, in particular, from you, as a military expert, about what we speak when we are talking about losses, please. when we are talking about losses in the general sense of the word, the following types are understood. that is, these are really dead but at the same time wounded, including those who have already recovered and returned to the formation, as well as including polonyni, that is, what is expected in the conditions of the loss, at the same time, in relation to the statement of this representative of european politics, there is an important aspect in that the press service has already informed that exactly such a calculation, that is , it will not lose the dead, and this is the total loss it was reported and clarified at the same time regarding the assessment of

any distributed there exactly this figure in 100,000 e-e and to what extent this figure really corresponds to reality, then it is better to look at it better that the general staff of the ministry of defense and ukraine's position is that these figures are not reported, but of course there are losses, and this is a reminder again that every centimeter of ukrainian land goes to the armed forces of ukraine for a reason, but it is the blood of our military. dear mr. editors, we would like you commented on the statement from our main intelligence agency that russia can strike with missiles at any moment, preparations are underway, the representative of the main intelligence agency vadimsky bitsky stated that the enemy does not abandon its intentions strike at any moment, but today the situation is quite calm, there are scheduled flights of the russian strategic aviation. they

are carried out in the eastern regions. there are a lot of people with whom we communicate, like me, such as khrystyna yatskiv , they ask us so, when should we expect what? what should we expect, and accordingly ? information, assumptions again, so they began to prophesy, so to speak . well, accordingly, this not too well-thought-out statement began to be dispersed in our telegram channels , and so on. to ask about the prospects of a massive missile strike, both taking into account the new air defense systems and, in general, what goals russia would like to achieve in the current circumstances, not the same as the predictions regarding of a possible strike, so really here. the fact is that

if you simply take the general statistics starting from october with the pause that the army of the russian federation makes in general regarding missile attacks, then you can clearly see that the minimum period is a week and taking into account that some may be chasing views in publications of your messages, starting, roughly speaking, 7 days after the last strike. such rejections can be, but you must remember again, of course, that the russian federation has the ability to launch missile strikes and to do it en masse and that’s how she can do it. well, at least once a week, with a pause, there are periods of one and a half and two weeks, that is, they accumulate a certain stock of rockets . there is the base of russian ships and the preparation of these missiles for launch. that is, it is not just to charge it and also to load this flight

task to check the missiles for combat capability and a huge set of tasks, that is, this one takes a certain time, of course. well, let's say it is fixed our intelligence is active in principle, for example, the same ships in the black sea , and every day it is even reported how many ships, exactly, the missile of the carrier rocket-caliber is currently in the audience, for example, now one ship. that is, we are not it will be reported, for example, that there are four missiles in the sea, and each of them has eight caliber missiles, so this is a certain marker that, well, we need to prepare. but again, this does not mean that any other air alarm announced by the air force of ukraine must be ignored on any other day, it is extremely important to work delicately with the air alert and stay safe at the same time. should be in them in a general

launch in order to simply break through the classification in them, which can be well, if we take hypothetically, how many rockets can be launched there at the same time, 60-80 100 well, if you count all that metal that is in they are there, respectively, for this, if we take into account the intakes, then we will come to the fact that the already available stock of missile calibers and whether the air base reported by the ministry of defense is no longer enough to ensure all the launches in principle. that is, everyone says such ships, but in practice they can launch due to the fact that the missiles themselves and the planes themselves and the ships themselves have to be prepared somewhere up to 100 rockets, well, these are the last launches , for example, there were approximated in this aspect there from 70 80 100, that is, of them really exclusively due to the fact that each of the anti-missile complex has a channel, that is, the amount of force that they can fire at the same time and even a banal number of simple-missile launchers, well,

this means that a certain number of them really break through. well, as we understand it, we will be protected from massive missile attacks only a greater number of our corresponding air defense installations, that is, it is not even a question of the number of shells that will shoot down enemy missiles, the question is exactly how many we can launch at once in opposition to everything because they are they launching what? oleg well, we are so far so we look with hope at the possibility of receiving patriots, so far germany is cautiously hinting that they are standing this installation should be placed in poland, although the poles regularly bow to our country and note that the best poland would be protected if this installation was located somewhere in ukraine, but we understand that after yesterday 's meeting of the north atlantic council,

in particular, the north atlantic alliance itself, not on behalf of the community, but its individual members after all will think about the fact that you should somewhat intensify the provision of some types of weapons to us what is the first priority to be elected? this is where the bucharest people came out - first of all, about the general, in my opinion, vector is simply already full of what it will support with all available means of ukraine and the understanding is already at this level. that is, we must consider that it is too much. well, there are certain countries, let's not point fingers at hungary, which, let's say, may have a certain different position. that is, well, but in the view itself, the general vector is that all countries understand that ukraine's victory over the russian federation is, let's say, the main guarantee of world security in principle, and so we are now talking about strengthening air defense, we are talking about the transfer . there

was a question whether, for example, patriots would be handed over to the usa, and there was the answer. unfortunately, the following was something that has not yet been considered, because it is necessary to remember that peter, this is me. it is an extremely expensive weapon, it is specific. it is more intended as a means against missile defense, but with a missile, i would take it directly, and also three questions, that is, just to understand the pact, three missiles each cost 3 million dollars at the level of the 17th year for the us army, if you take a battery with a battery just petri bacteria, then at the same time a salvo costs 0, 4 billion dollars, that is, they are more realistic here, even considering american money, it would not be like that khrystyna yaskov finally has some important questions. we all deal with regular donations, including for our army, and we understand that we can entrust our funds

to large funds that have proven themselves well over the past 8 years. in particular , others were also included there eh hmm hugged the leader with let’s say so they collect on black boxes and regularly hint that what we hear in bryansk is related to this black box. well, let's assume that it could be serious. well, the fact is that i am sure that later how it will happen. maybe it will be announced, but i will them even if such respectable volunteer funds collect on the basis of their believe in yourself, the sums are like that and they don't talk about it here. well, it's really possible. let it still

remain a surprise, and first of all, a surprise for the rashists from the express well, but nothing, let's wait until victory, so to speak. to support there is an extra penny, so to speak, to spend it to support the armed forces of ukraine and we thank oleg kadkov, the editor of defense express worked live on the espresso tv channel, we are passing the word now to our news, journalists have prepared it in the world, we will present the latest information, iryna koval, our colleague and iryna thank you for your word, colleagues. well, there was an explosion in one of the ukrainian embassies. i will tell you exactly. literally in a moment, there will be a lot of other information in the news release, stay tuned