gorlytskyi and donetsk and somehow develop the offensive so that there is a lot of at least some kind of winner at least in some place. the south, that is, something from the north, because, well, from the south, it’s clear, it’s all this , and from the south, what, i- what’s the goal? story beats you hear it now to which of us the question is for you anyway, but everything is honest with me here

is not here what is happening there now here if they fix it i understand because the connection is bad north of baku i don't know well there is another attempt to reach but how successful was it how successful it is, it must be on the spot, and there is an obscene military saying that can be reduced to the wording was not there, they don’t comment on it. then the question is this. it’s up to mr. oleksandr. troops, that is, what should be now er, er, er, an effective way of countering these two attempts to pass there from one side, pass from the north

, come from the south, check the route. this is a really dangerous story. and there are indeed heavy battles and no matter what, but this constant way of advancing, well, how much they dispose of there is their question. but nevertheless, they gave promotion and already put in such a threat in the situation, if we were to counter alexander, you can hear me very badly with the connection a-a, i can’t hear very well, i’m sorry for myself, how should we now counter the efforts of the russians under the actual, well, around bakhmut, so that we should do there in this situation so a- in my opinion, the situation is as follows: bakhmut is actually a strategic

goal for the russians today. were a also pbk wagner, this will be the resources of the partially mobilized quite a large resource. and now having this situational promotion and near the bahmut, and they will be the taste of such a close victory with crumbs so deceptive the taste is necessarily a victory, so they can use a fairly large-scale resource in part- mobilized in order to a-a to throw their price, why bulls, the positions of the armed forces of ukraine, the situation is a-a difficult because in

this very location they really can more or less but about the same fully conduct combat operations i i see that mr. oleksandr is hard to hear, yes, practically nothing is heard. let's try to re-diall mr. oleksandr, and for now this is a question. i'm actually. well, let's go to viktor. i'll redirect viktor. how should we counteract all these attempts because, well, the loss of fodder is, in principle, there are dangerous life hacks i don't see it. unfortunately, if in other directions you can, for example, use a long

hand to destroy the same formations, then in the bakhmu direction it is impossible simply because of geographical factors, because we will not mow for example, the neck with the same hi-maps, and it ’s not good there now, but there i just see an option, except to hold on and do all the redeployment of forces, there are few relatives, just huge losses, and in principle it’s good, in fact, because the russians always have to do it. and if it’s done on in a well- prepared position, a large number of people lose over this, even if they have some progress of 500 m in six months, ah, this is actually good news, because if she had not been caught there, they would have been breaking somewhere in the city where possible it was much less convenient to defend, and bakhmut now fulfills the same role as a shield. and here, in my opinion , there are no uh, who are changers, there are no

universal weapons that they will give us, we have grabbed them now. just as we rejected them, this time er-er russia-1 khodakovsky said that, in principle, the goal is so general, it is to advance, well, to cover bakhmut, as er-er, mariupol was covered at one time, and then, as he said, to disassemble quarter by quarter, this is essentially destruction the city of bahmutu as such, that is, how close is this danger in general, the vector hears then answers simply regardless of whether there is a picture , how close this danger is, what can be

covered and this is how the destruction of the city will begin. the sound disappears . please repeat the previous ones. did you not hear what i said or did you hear? no, unfortunately, i was talking about what , well, the idea of ​​the russians is to do the same thing there as they did near mariupol, that is cover the city from two sides and then simply dismantle it block by block, how close is this danger to bakhmut and how much can this happen in principle because they want to stand there i want to have a suitable promotion in the vicinity they still haven't covered it yet and here's the question it's about mariupol, which, i'll remind you, was simply kept under a complete siege for several months, of course , i'm not mariupol, geographically and demographically, it's not that big, but for

now it's not being discussed, oduhovskyi has voiced except that theirs turned out to be blue, except that what they would ideally try to do, uh, uh, taking into account the thinness of their promotion and the promotion of ukrainians there . in other directions, with any success, we can already take moscow, except for this plan, uh, it will finally succeed, but again, everything can be dynamic here. that is, it can change at another moment, so they can simply push ahead and have more success, but so far there is no indication of this. ugh. well, i see that alexander has joined us, mr. alexander, let's continue with you. what they were trying to tell in relation to the countermeasures against the russians, here in this location under bakhmut, what can we do there in this location from your point of view? in fact , in this location, the armed forces of ukraine implement defense tactics of an exclusively defensive

nature. from change, it is necessary to increase the resource of those units that are there, i.e., reinforcements , to significantly increase the presence of formations that carried out not only defensive actions, but also rejected the enemy and went precisely to the counteroffensive but today, in my opinion, it is very realistic, because we have more priority directions and bridgeheads on which we can conduct more successful contour offensive operations, therefore, in the near future, this entire situation near bakhmut will be concentrated exclusively on the defense of taxis with the support positions from the observation center , for example, and support was prepared by fire energy systems, although this makes it quite difficult to use due to the same saturation with civilian

objects in this location, but on the other hand, they psychological impressions of the russian units of the russian occupiers . the russians for the tax seizure of this particular city these locations in the future, the situation will not change, i think until the first quarter of 2023 well, when you say that we should increase there, you mean ours well, increase the ukrainian group itself, that is, the number, well, the composition or somehow the artillery,

increase the armored vehicles. well, something like that. what do you mean? if we are talking about defensive actions, then increase again the number of artillery. both passively and reactively, if we are talking about offensive actions. actions, the increase of units that take part precisely in assault actions, offensive actions, er, these are tank units, these are other assault groups, and so on. the defense is now near bakhmut, it is the main one and it will remain there for a long time, that is, it is unlikely that we can expect any change there, i understand. and tell me, in principle, there is such a thing next to it. well, the russians are also making attempts to attack biloghirka. if i am right, there is a map. it would be possible to look at it, well, it’s not quite close, but nevertheless

, is it also connected with an attempt somehow from afar, or is it more connected with an attempt to somehow, somehow, improve the situation under criminalizing it is all also connected after all with their desire to get well how can you understand this, victors, this is primarily a threat to the lysichan north-donetsk main radiation curve, that is why it looks very threatening to them, it is like a springboard for further countermeasures of ukraine's weapons in this direction, it is clear yes, this here, here, here, viktor, what do you think here? well, to what extent can they be successful there, too? to what extent, in principle, can we expect

some intensification of actions there? well, it seems to me that in the north, everything is already better for of course, they are actively trying to alienate ukrainians , uh, they got mobs, they are chasing them into battle, you have resources and reserves, but i don’t think that there will actually be any problems, and in principle, it is not very convenient and active to speak there, so i think rather i expect topic what sooner or later they brought in ukraine again, repeat some certain surprise there, you know, i suggest to talk about such an aspect er well, at the moment there are a lot of conversations, first of all about er air defense patriot- patriot who er is anyone there then they promise, then they say what

no, it's impossible, someone is supplying it to taiwan , although it's also like how it was impossible, uh, um, on the other hand, uh, well, in general, uh, there were statements by nato that they would strengthen the ukrainian ppp, oleksandr, if you say well, let's not lead to speak so directly to zrk petri. well, if at all now, it would be about the supply of some new or strengthening of the existing weapons . it was desirable for us, first of all, to get something that would really change the situation with shelling and with the capabilities of the russians to attack our infrastructural facilities, other energy sources, all of this is quite complete. we must understand that the strengthening

of our air defense is not only complexes of one type of one of the nomenclature of small radio courts of medium radius, then of large radius, that is, which provide us with full-fledged crazy the heat of the high-tech high-tech new and here are such complexes as, for example, irises on the very crotal aspid, they cooperate very well with each other precisely by creating this echeloned tata and if we we are not talking about the detective, that is why i also have doubts about providing ukraine with these stars in the near future. it is a very good thing that has already appeared . km, and

the most interesting thing is that it is aimed at the destruction of ballistic objects, and in the near future we may have problems with ballistic objects because it is not yet known for sure whether russia has received ballistic missiles from iran, whether they will receive them or not. here is the most important question in the near future, do they have this resource available, and that is why a transitional complex type would also be beneficial to us, and if it is even a door, too, in this way, they will not provide us with a request regarding the same and e to the french and italian e-e management has already been sent and on this account, it is necessary to press precisely on this aspect that anti-ballistic complexes are needed in ukraine just like all the others

, you know well. in principle, i think that it is possible right now. will come but this it can happen, for example, in six months, and how much faster can the issue with those french complexes that you mentioned just now be resolved, well, the bee itself is the problem of protecting our airspace and strikes. who are our energy critical infrastructure, they accelerate these events, accelerate them significantly, and these bureaucratic processes take place processes faster than it was at the very beginning in that institution in the party in ukraine and that is, this terrorist threat from the russian occupiers , it still helps to solve the issue which were earlier, first of all, to quickly

provide us with all the complexes. but if we talk directly about sanctions, depending on the speed of decision-making, we can receive them, for example, in the first quarter of 2023. our international partners have such an opportunity, and probably even earlier. if they will really hurry. how fast are you? more precisely, this is what you are saying. it is not just to get it, but also to have trained staff. is it just to physically get it, then you still have to learn the operators, it is actually 3-4 months . a-a skills base and sometimes even more, but our international partners have repeatedly emphasized that a-a military service, all the armed forces of ukraine, they plan new equipment much faster than they could even imagine, and our partners themselves, that's why the pace is especially when

we talk about operators with queens, we are talking about crews who are familiar not only with soviet models from interactive complexes, they were already familiar with nato standards, and they can master this or that system in the shortest possible time indeed, it depends on its inclination, but the whole point is that it is the western models that are the modern models of all military-technical equipment, and they are the most favorable for mastering them as soon as possible, they do not cause any problems in mastering like old soviet equipment they are available both in the interface and in some other aspects of technical and other viktor oh, look at these conversations in general and about the statements about the

possibility of supplying petri, then the statement of the minister of foreign affairs of latvia regarding the fact that ukraine should have the opportunity to strike at the bases of russian weapons, and this is the caspian sea for a moment, so if we are serious, who is shooting at ukraine, is medvedev's answer, well , regarding the fact that if the patriot is sent, then we will have the right to destroy it, haha they don't destroy everything else, but is there anything at all? this is all together, all the components are together. can we say that we are on the verge of some kind of change, perhaps in the dynamics of war in general, in the approach to war in relation to our allies, i would like to believe but honestly saying not so far, not very well, so far it does not go beyond the limits of the conversations of our close allies, but in

principle, even before that, they asked to give us everything possible, although, to be honest, i do not know that we can theoretically consider entire regions, as far as i know, they themselves versions have been proven to me, but in the sea we can’t use them, so i don’t know what to take and here we are talking about, although definitely the same complexes that would be at least 500 km away this is the most hostile sea but it would also be very good this too was at least it would give the opportunity to respond to the russians by forcing their infrastructure to be something at least approximately symmetrical, when it appeared that what was hitting at least the suburbs of moscow, it already changed the situation a little and it would be good, but again, it does not depend on the environmental will of our political partners parts to the microphone, i can't now

, now it's more audible because it's a communication problem, but er, well , but nevertheless, look, er, well, what in general, well, what else can there be in general, er, well, except for air defense, er, who can be means of impression which well because air defense - this is defense first of all, but what means of impression, what possible offensive weapons could we be talking about, and if our allies managed to understand what to wait for the destruction of the entire infrastructure of ukraine, well, you know, this is a counter -productive way of waging war in principle about, firstly, about the various means of defeating the lord, i am not going to provide some

characteristics now, but it is primarily about whether you have missiles, this is the first thing, and secondly, it is about what is more specifically about aviation, on the one hand, it is being discussed, as it were, in 16 on the other on the other hand, there recently appeared some sulfa of 39 swedish chuvkas, it would also be good , because in fact, if we could in one way or another establish, well, even out the situation in the air, at least in certain areas. seriously, it is within our power. let's say our ability to somehow uh, well, at least drive the russians away from new new territories. of course, this will not protect the energy infrastructure, but it will help a lot in the process and not in general to provide ukraine and uh, there is a discussion now

in general, with regard to what kind of airplanes would make sense because there is a statement about what to provide there, it seems that i could, well, some could in short, i can't for- i don't want to say now, i don't remember exactly nomenclature eh, but eh, as far as i know, this is not a very good option, and at least they do not decide on any prices for us, eh, well, they will not give any such significant preferences, but on the other hand, there is a statement from the representative of our air command and hnat, who said that they were it would be better if they gave us a new one there, some kind of new ones airplanes and there he even called which one actually what would you say about this discussion that would make sense if it were about airplanes, well, the

discussion about airplanes has been going on for quite some time, it’s actually not even since 2022, in 2021 they were talking about e- what exactly is the renewal of the air forces of the armed forces of ukraine and what exactly are the planes? what fighters do we need? and there were a lot of versions, and there were constructive, most constructive discussions, and even then in the 21st year, it seems to me that it is more effective for our airspace. by air abufer 15x fighter, in my opinion, because this is an aircraft that was made for operational actions in pink airspace, and in fact , the airspace of ukraine should be considered for our e-e planes, for our pilots, so hostile airspace is present in it,

for example, here e -e anti-aircraft systems of the enemy what was updated by the russian occupiers and at that time and even today the 15x is the fastest aircraft in its class in the world with the largest load of weapons that does not have any aircraft and it also has of the operating system of the operating system with the largest computational element and process, that is, it is even better than the f-35 a-a but again, this was in 2021, now it is a completely different reality , and therefore ukraine can count primarily on providing we have soviet-type mig -29 aircraft, for example, first of all, and i am sure

that we will receive them in the near future, and it may also be in 16, if not the latest, if not the oldest, modifications in order to carry out as a condition, there was more support for contour offensive actions by the armed forces of ukraine, and maybe it is not the best, because there is a discussion about the provision of the a10 e-e bolt e-e, this is an attack aircraft that has also proven itself very well during its use . that the support of the armed forces of ukraine can be provided exclusively at the expense of and support from a safe distance for the pilots not only from the pilots but also from the machine of the aircraft itself and stormed

aviation in this case it used to be the m-16 in them 29 well, if you're lucky, probably not even at 15. well, the main thing here is that it should not be done again after there will be some negative changes for us at the front because, uh, now, uh, russian planes, well, the last ones are uh-uh this week there was also a message that there was no such thing for a long time, and now again ours shot down another su-25 there that flew carelessly to the front line, closer to the front line, but in general, well, that is, the russians cannot fly so directly without karno in our space, they shoot from afar this is obvious but on the other hand also this uh recent weeks have shown that they are actively probing our air defense and well, the question is how successful it is. we don't know yet, but how dangerous it is

in general, the story with this probing is not very dangerous, viktor, i think it's more likely that they tried to find a loophole, but so far in our war aviation behaves cautiously, it is particularly effective on both sides, because actually both sides have an effective pc system, both sides have bigger sheep, so let's say so here for now and where is mutual jumping from both sides and i don't see for this situation to change dramatically without any changes, the russians will not grow up. no, even that was not possible. ukrainian pilots can appear on the contrary for a visa, but this is not a matter of the next few days. i have to apologize a lot, i have a little work here i should have checked out 5 minutes earlier now, so i really wish everyone a great rainy day next week, so we could talk

about something good, but for now they should be turned on, good luck, viktor, then good luck to you. -is let's uh, this is also a topic, how dangerous is this ppu probing for us, and uh, actually, how should we resist it, because hmm, well, the russians have a large stockpile of aviation weapons and, in principle, they have uh, well, let's say, the temptation to use it is so great for now that they cannot do this to a sufficient extent, but how does this threaten us, the interpretation of our hood is really a serious threat to them, because every time they use different scenarios on this, it’s all so tricks.