all the militants, including the poles, are already talking about the fact that their participation in the war is very likely. how do you consider these two scenarios? this is not the first time we have asked you about the scenario of the attempted entry of the troops of the republic of belarus into the territory of ukraine. i understand the so-called peacekeeping contingent from nato, which can also intervene in this confrontation . i have been emphasizing for a long time that the issue of the operational resolution of the russian-ukrainian war lies not only in the ability of the armed forces ukraine and the help of our partners are needed by that armed ken, but also in the fact that it is necessary to create an anti-putin military coalition

. of ukraine was able to ensure in the defined terms and in the medium-term perspective at least our victory over the russian aggressor because, first of all, in my opinion, the time has come to be clear with our partners to measure the stages of this war and the final result of this war should be exactly joint work, joint military activity for the liberation of the entire ukrainian territory, this is, first of all, secondly, what concerns our close neighbor, the republic of belarus, you know what processes have been taking place there recently, you know what happened there at the odkb summit, where in fact well, not only on my conviction

, the burial of this block took place because everyone there is looking in different directions, there are contradictions, there is a war between individuals concerning azerbaijan and armenia and as for kazakhstan, there is a separate history of the guarantors of their security, we already understand that china is speaking out and mr. lukashenko allowed himself there, you understand, we know what words will happen to the soviet union if russia is defeated and immediately after that, as we know, he left minsk with the life of the foreign affairs minister of the republic of belarus, mr. makey, and at such an age, when, well, without being sick or experiencing any problems, this person left for another world, which raises a lot of suspicions about what is happening in elites of belarus, what are the processes there, who still

disagrees or agrees, and what is being done with those who do not agree with what putin likes, and in this particular case, i expressed this uh thesis before and not only me about the fact that putin will try to sway eh -e lukashenka to active military operations against ukraine with the help of lviv, but we know and our general staff knows that the armed forces of the republic of belarus will not be able to be an effective combat unit in countermeasures with the acquired experience and practices of the armed forces of ukraine, this is the first time secondly, we know the position of the main mass of the population and a significant part of the personnel of the armed forces of the republic of belarus, and lastly, mr. lukashenko, regardless of the quality of his dictatorial machinations, the traits of his preferences - this is the kind of person who

tries to stick in this extremely difficult situation for him personally and for his clan in such a way as to somehow stay in power and giving some signals of measures and at the same time not finally refusing to take actions aimed at supporting the same regime putin, but in general, this is not only my assessment and not my opinion, the situation is such that the measures taken by the ukrainian side in this region and on the border are the likely and obvious actions of the western world in the event that lukashenka tries to dare to step they will be final for and for the life of lukashenka and for the life of his regime

lieutenant general veteran of the foreign intelligence of ukraine analyzed what is happening now in his own position voiced let's listen before we give another word in the studio such, absolutely categorically, as for me, danilov's statement, we can now listen to it, what he said today about our enemy, and it is simply necessary to destroy them so that they cease to exist as a country within those borders. how do you not exist? why, because today today, russia is one of the few countries that has colonies on its territory, which destroyed a huge number of er peoples of ihor vasyonok, well, it's hard not to agree, if they say it from such authorities, then it's good who

came to our land, an enemy of russia, nothing we will definitely have to destroy them and we will destroy them, but going back to your question about how to survive this winter, how difficult will this winter be because this week will really be so full of information space with forecasts about the next powerful massive missile attack on the critical infrastructure of ukraine, we must i have already gotten used to this and understand that such massive strikes may and may not be many, but they will still occur, including on the power system, the enemy is simply the enemy, there is no other way out, now he is in he sells wagons, loses on the battlefield, and he tries to drive us into darkness, into cold, into hunger, and to force us into some kind of negotiations , they cannot understand. i am convinced that they will not understand that with no terrorist measures,

no theory they will force us to give up our land, so today is the first day of winter, the winter will be very difficult, but this is the last winter for russia, from such practical advice, frankly speaking, i am ostap. no one will break it, but believe me, the small pot is also important now. and who says it is very important. who can buy a generator? who can buy a mole battery with a converter? who can buy firewood? buy a gas cylinder in order to really survive this winter. read the latest message from the ukrainian pravda, the power system reserve is not 15%. not everything is so simple, but i want to ask now, in whose hands is the energy system today? why do

medvedchuk and his wife, why are there 10 blocks of shares in babokov’s company, look at the speaker of the state duma of the russian federation, as if the other day, the head of the security service of ukraine raised the issue of opening a criminal case, and someone there in the verkhovna rada will finally introduce the issue of the transfer of these state assets to e-e into state ownership and why, for example, firtashevsky oblgaz lviv oblgaz surkis firtash why was the decision made a long time ago to transfer it to naftogaz, that is, into the state ownership of a state company and no one the head no, the previous head of naftogaz, the night , today's head of autogaz does not stimulate the transfer of this, why does firtash's management work there, why does firtash continue to make money on us ukrainians, this i can't understand, frankly speaking, and these are extremely important questions what kind of state power

and the prosecutor's office and the security service and our people deputies must raise the term in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, they absolutely started talking about poland and to mr. czech - the question is obviously you, a person who knows this in ukrainian on polish politics let's make this statement the last one. martina ochep, the deputy head of the polish ministry of national defense, will quote it if possible. well, there is a simple answer to a simple question, but what is the probability of a war in which we will participate ? high is too high for us to consider this scenario only hypothetically if something is at least 30% political the border with nato if they try to attack, and

the second thing i noticed was a week ago, maybe 5-6 days ago, the russian telegram channels started dispersing uh, well, among their audience such information that nato troops are about to enter and this area will be occupied western ukraine, and i immediately had the first thought, uh, maybe they are preparing their audience for the introduction of peacekeeping troops who will fight on the side of ukraine . in general, what are the potential probabilities of such scenarios? and what does this kind of intensification of military statements on the part of poland indicate, because it seemed that after the rocket fell? in this case, it must be said that when russian

propaganda talks about western belarus, it means western belarus, because in reality this is all rhetoric, it is aimed at lukashenko adding additional pseudo-arguments so that belarus went to war with ukraine, starting way back in 2009 , the belarusian and russian armies conducted military exercises for well. it would seem that there is little to do in 2009, the exercises are going on and so on. what will they teach, what did they study and what hypothetical scenarios did they prepare? hiding under some invented name there was the explosion of the uprising of the polish national minority and in which you as an uprising

are helped by volunteers and then the polish army, respectively, the allied troops of russia and the belarusians are preparing to put down this rebellion once and then to crush the polish army , up to and including the use of nuclear weapons against poland, targeting warsaw itself in 2009 . you too, that is, we forget that russia planned its campaign against not only ukraine in 2021, in the 22nd year it was already implemented, but against

nato and its and its eastern flank, they thought yes return to the front to the borders conditionally from 1997 , and as you know from putin's articles, everything that was once russia was not only the soviet union, but the russian empire where the russian language was spoken, the russian empire must be restored, that is, it is natural that they today they are talking about the fact that poland is preparing to take over western ukraine, well, this is of course the product of a sick person and a head but this is also a video, i have to say about these conversations and where should the german attention be, or is it a german patriot or on the territory of the east of poland or western ukraine and they when they started again finally all this started with the head of the foreign intelligence service of the nazi federation when

he started it 2 days or three days ago, that is, for me it was a signal that they take seriously that ukraine will receive these patriots and that in the criminal territory of ukraine, these patriots can be located , that is, this is another conventional barrier that america and the whole of nato have set before themselves, it may not be overcome. as far as i understand, it is not military, of course, but what mr. ignat said, it the key thing is actually the patriots don’t work, it’s not the installation itself, i took that beech as in the 14th year, brought the trailers and took it back, the whole system works, it’s as i understand the ancient ancient er-e means against missile air defense there are also medium and tactical and they are patriots are protected by a whole system plus they work synchronously with a whole computer computer network and what is the

key value in the context of these patriots that it should be omitted after these missile attacks against ukraine e-e nato and on the next eighth me it seems that ramstein himself decided that in ukraine this coalition of those who want to support ukraine is building a three-echelon system of anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense, that is, there will be a system of protection of the entire territory of ukraine, and this is gradually, as i understand it, now implemented , that is, by and large, even poland itself understands that the systems petre, such people will stand on the territory of ukraine, the same poland will be protected even more effectively than if they stand in rzeszów, that is, they will meet missiles already on the territory of poland and yes, they will meet for, well

, i'm sorry, i don't even know how to call this opinion correctly, but it's rational. it seems to me that if it is not 100 km from poland , then the probability of an effective defense seam of poland will be higher, of course, like, i can also say and this proven on this psevodo and yes well, we are secrets that in a row, so that there is a battery of patriots that protects this airport, the airfield. with compasses and so on, that is, there are patriots who can shoot down those who fly into poland, but from the underwing in order to fly over a missile that, for example, hits 30 km e-e on the territory of poland, it will not reach the missile will already fall, that is, in fact, when to think about defense well, there is no i know that the military would rather say, well, 50 km, 60 km would be on the territory of poland, of course it would be more effective for them to stand on

the territory of ukraine, it would be faster to fly when there is an understanding that they are flying on the territory of poland, but i want to say something completely different. i am very afraid and worried when politicians start talking and we will pass on this and we will pass on because it was a sad, very sad and sad experience of the transfer of polish media and polish courts in the month of april, remember mariupol , close the sky and so on and the decision was already made principled american and pressures that poland can hand over to the copper and the court of ukraine, it was a principled decision, this is the most reliable, and then unfortunately they intervened. and instead of this, poland had to be protected by american, german and british fighter jets, plus, unfortunately, the politicians intervened, they started their game, are we going to transfer safe and so on, and then a part of

the political community and military experts pressed. come on, if the americans want to hand over these planes to ukraine, then we will move them to the airfield in ramstein tom and let the americans hand them over to ukraine . then putin says america entered the war, then ballistic missiles and so on and so forth and it begins , there would be no nuclear war, but in america a discussion begins as to how we are threatened and will fall on us and will radically break public opinion, this support, what support is there now in the west, huge support ukraine would then be shaken. this is obvious, and i am

also afraid of the discussion on patriots. these patriots should stand on the territory of ukraine and be an element of the defense system of ukraine. it is obvious that the less we talk about it to speak to the public sphere the better and the less politicians will talk about it let the military agree let them build as general mili said a unified defense system against air defense and anti-missile defense of ukraine because then we will all be safe and i can say that this is how it is happening but let it happen as soon as possible and we quietly include the military in our conversation. in the direction where you are, the military generally perceives what the winter will be like, and the calendar winter has already arrived today, well, in the eastern

bakhmut direction, it is already hot for the first week , the situation is difficult. well, the military, who are concentrated here, withstand these attacks that are happening now, the intensity of the fire is extremely high, nevertheless, i am sure that this direction will be maintained, moreover, we hope that soon we will still be able to release all our measures regarding land it is a little easier for the military to comment because everyone has already met the winter without light and without any comforts in extremely difficult conditions, so the military is easier to deal with. of course, they do everything so that other residents of our country can survive this

winter in more comfortable conditions, at least in stable conditions, because this winter will definitely be continues to be difficult, everyone there started talking from the summer of the month. but i believe that we are forced to this winter and we will survive it with dignity, everything will be fine, of course we need to prepare, we need to pay attention to the messages which come from local self-government bodies which come from military administrations to refuel with air warning signals to prepare there to help each other prepare for cold times for long power outages and so on . there are conditions and opportunities for that, and if there are, what are they in order to have a peacekeeping contingent on the territory of our state, are we

needed ? we need any help and we will not refuse it. is it politically expedient or nato will take such a step? it is extremely difficult to say as far as weapons are concerned. of long-range artillery, then there were difficult negotiations about the transfer of the vsezav system to us. now there, as far as i know, there are certain negotiations going on there, signals about the transfer of patriots . of course, any help is necessary for us , because, unfortunately, we have very good neighbors, and

unfortunately, during the last decades, under different governments, we did not give enough, we did not give enough attention to our military was paid enough attention to the armaments, they behaved rather negligently during the transfer of our strategic aircraft cruise missiles that are now flying back to us. in my opinion, a little, not a little, even a categorically terrible mistake was made during the transfer of the nuclear arsenal and the guarantees under which this nuclear arsenal was transferred. this is all we have for now , but on the other hand, today i would like to congratulate all ukrainians on the anniversary of the referendum, and unfortunately, after 30 years, we must continue to defend our independence and we have to. well, i hope that after the victory, finally, everyone, politicians, officials, in general,

all ukrainians will understand how good our country is, how important it is for us, and how much work must be done to make this country truly powerful strong and so that our children can live in a good , developed, legal, non-corrupt country in a good country , in direct communication, it is located where these places do not need to be specified, and take care of america, we are waiting for the activation . the only thing i want is a lot of information now appearing online, what is important is the general director of dtek , mr. timchenko, who two weeks ago said that it is possible for ukrainians to go abroad, then this statement was refuted now in the detector has already declared that there would be no blackout if

russia had not bombarded ukraine, that the specialists with this organization, which is known to be private, as well as ukrenergo, and they are ready for all challenges , have already gained the necessary experience. will have to either he or his press service or in the service where also to refute this so by the way it is important for all ukrainians now the situation with the light of mr. participate once again to the primary question that was asked what should we expect to what extent we are actually ready for this winter and how we will come out after the end of this winter, well, in my opinion, when assessing what to expect, we need to use the best, most expedient, realistic approach, because on the one hand, if we are very optimistic, say that it's all nonsense, nothing will happen. you can be calm

, well, of course, it's good days. then it becomes painful and difficult on the other hand, it is definitely not necessary somewhere and you know to make some such horror stories and the most incredible there gloomy forecasts because it can cause unnecessary questions and possibly unnecessary panic and we have to understand that russia itself is one of the goals that it wants to achieve it is on blows, it is in particular panic among society, it is on society, accordingly, a certain reaction that will also shape the agenda and influence the government, therefore, it should not be done either. and when we look realistically, it will certainly be somewhere more or less correspond to the real state of affairs and actually will optimize our behavior well, if we look realistically, then we must understand that unfortunately the strikes will continue here, as they say, you don't need to have great analytical abilities

. that is, this is the strategy of the current russia, it is actually well, she works, that is, for her, this strategy is already very familiar, she is in principle of all vii, on which she once implemented such mass terrorist acts, strikes and so on, there in syria, and in other countries, she is, in principle, well let's talk frankly, she was trying to achieve such results. that is, did she provoke any large-scale migration crises, er, pressured europe to make certain concessions, and now she is trying to do so in this way, after all, to try to bring ukraine and ukrainians to the knees of peaceful ukrainians, but er, actually, fortunately for us, and uh, up for russia, she cannot come to terms with it or understand that, in principle, her strategy in ukraine simply will not work, because, in principle, well, somewhere here , we talked a lot about it, we have already experienced a lot and we are already in principle ready for any development of events

and in principle its strategy will not work, but what it is, let's say, follow-up strikes, which will again cause the wrong reaction that russia wants, it will force it to continue preparing another series of strikes and in principle, this situation will be repeated until russia is capable of a technical and physical strike and therefore we should be ready for this in principle, now secondly , in principle, i completely agree with ostap that in principle and this war it should be perceived as certain opportunities, and in particular for reassessing the situation. that is, we should also understand that war is a tragedy, war is bad, but war is also an opportunity to finally forever cut this umbilical cord that keeps us with russia. this is finally an opportunity not just to withdraw from russia in principle, for the first time we got the opportunity to destroy russia as a state

, at least in its current status, and here the question is not only that we others were told by mr. danilov, and thank god that it is really already coming from all such officials, we must do everything possible to make russia cease to exist in its current status, and we must also prove it to the international community that if there is, it depends on how the state in its current status will still be a potential threat not only for ukraine but for the entire international community and and it is actually in their interests and in the interests of europe and america that this state ceases to exist now i still want to touch the actual question of a possible attack from belarus, you know well, we have been mulling over this topic for a very long time and it seems to me that well, i certainly cannot

predict all the options and what can be done in the heads of inadequate officials or politicians there, i mean there or russian or belarusian but it seems to me that such an aggression on the part of belarus itself would be an act of suicide both for russia and for the belarusians, and because, in principle, from a military point of view, i think that the chances of getting any gains are practically zero, and in in terms of political image, this will be an unequivocal loss because it will potentially lead to the fall of the lukashenka regime, it will lead to the fact that russia itself will lose its almost the only real ally, it will lead to the fact that russia will once again step on the same rake because we remember let's go