they believe in such things, that's why i don't rule out that they have three goals at once, that is, psychological information warfare and some things related to such practices. well, in general, they are trying to somehow bring our ukrainian diplomats out of balance, let's say in general, this is the story and haunts and most likely i emphasize once again that this is not the end, there will be some kind of continuation. perhaps, even to great regret, there will really be some parcels with bombs. by the way, what happened in one of our diplomatic missions ? a classic act of terrorism and russia. in this way, it simply does not hide and it declares that it is not just a sponsor of terrorism, it is a terrorist country because it acts with terrorist methods in the czech republic. initiative on a group called a gift for putin, all in response to russian missile terror, the head of the ukrainian ministry of defense has already reacted to such an initiative, he says. it is gaining popularity as of now.

supported by more than 10,000 people oleksiy reznikov is convinced that this can be a good example for europe's partner countries in ukraine in europe and the world it's time for the terrorist state to taste its own medicine to taste what they are doing to the civilian population of ukraine a great initiative from the czech public to turn off the electricity and water supply of the russian embassy in prague oleksiy reznikov minister of defense of ukraine mr. arturovych it is clear that we are talking more about a symbolic action that would emphasize and would create the same level of discomfort for the russians in the czech republic who live in that embassy as we all feel now, but from your point of view, in general, how should ukraine respond to these strikes on our infrastructure, since a symmetrical response will obviously be equated to terrorism and well, we not terrorists. we cannot afford this, first of

all, in the context of this initiative of the czech czech people, what it shows, it shows that support for ukraine is not decreasing and remains at a very high level. it is the citizens who come forward with additional initiatives, trying to support our country in this way. and regarding the reaction, well, it seems to me that today ukraine is doing everything it should . in this regard, on the foreign policy front, that is, how do we explain this to our partners and allies? to us so that they come so that we can see what is happening here that ukraine does not manipulate any such things here, we just call these things by their names and the second point is of course about strengthening our defense in the context of the provision of anti-aircraft defense against missiles , the appearance, for example, of the same petro systems, which the minister of foreign affairs talked about a lot, shows that, in fact, the position of our allies on the whole issue is changing little by little, and in this

context we need to work and further understanding that we really will not respond in the same way to russia by striking some objects of their critical infrastructure simply because well then there will be no point in fighting for all that we are fighting for but at the same time, of course, it is necessary to prepare as much as possible for possible further missile attacks and to prepare both in the context of ensuring energy security, and about this, active work is currently underway to create, well, in fact, such a parallel energy rammstein. well, in the context of strengthening of course our defense forces in order to russia, well, these attacks by the russian federation did not have the effect that the russians hoped for. well, it is clear to support at least publicly information similar initiatives that arise in other countries why because it is a component of the global initiative to recognize the russian federation as a sponsor of terrorism by the russian federation and the country as a sponsor of terrorism , to sever or minimize diplomatic relations with this ukraine, and such stories

about petitions are just talking about the fact that many countries are thinking about the procedure and the support of the citizens of their countries is definitely on the side of their governments who believe that russia needs e- well, to call her to account and to do everything so that she stops both the energy terror against ukraine and the war in general by withdrawing her troops from this territory and ending this war is better for the patriots of kyiv started negotiations with germany regarding the placement of the petriv anti-aircraft missile complex on our territory, this is what the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro kuleba , said in an interview with pol sad news. other european countries and nato we started negotiations with germany on this issue, we raised these issues before the united states because they have patriot technology dmytro

kuleba minister of foreign affairs of ukraine the representative of the defense of germany confirms that he says that they are not going to transfer to poland petri, they say that these anti-aircraft missiles can only be placed on the territory of the country, but german military personnel can control the management of the air defense system. return to missile strikes as such, if you take the political context of these strikes and analyze them from the point of view of achieving the tasks that the russians set before themselves, it turns out that they do not make sense, that is, they only worsened the situation of russia and politically, because they accelerated the recognition of russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. obviously, they had an influence on this, they did not break the will of ukrainians to opera. the lights in our country could not be turned off. we received more air defense systems we did not go to the negotiations, and obviously this strengthened our

position even more in the sense that we once again showed, more precisely , russia once again that there is no point in talking to it about anything, it is a terrorist state, but from a political point of view what is the point of russia continuing these strikes if each subsequent strike seems to only worsen their situation, the point is actually one and here you just have to understand the essence of this country as a country that has primarily an authoritarian regime, they have no alternative, they have no back-up plans , they resort to turning away the thief tero hoping that sooner or later, and this is their official position, which they directly talk about, this number of these blows will turn into quality in their understanding, this quality is when ukraine capitulates or is presented on the terms that russia eh, well, really is constantly changing, even now i don’t know what they actually want but nevertheless, these conditions must be voiced by the russian federation that’s all, you don’t need to look for any complications, you know, any additional ideas, opinions that exist in the

russian leadership, they took up this plan and they will search to the end despite any reputational losses and so on, we believe that if they can push it and it will lead to the goal they set for themselves, then after many years or months, well, again the question here is what kind of planning horizon do they have, they will be able to somehow improve this image there and like everyone will forget about what they did in ukraine, well, this is the logic of the authoritarian regime and we must understand this logic in the sense that you can only talk to them from a position of strength and it is very good that today there is such a position as ukraine as a whole, starting from the people, you correctly noted that and ending with our leadership, that it is very important that our partners and allies have such a position, which, by the way, has evolved a lot since february 24, but it has evolved for the better precisely because of ukraine's ability to carry out the entire operation, mr. yevhen, nato's position has evolved. they have shown their strength, but what

does putin really think, does he really believe that nato is strong, or does he consider nato to be too weak an organization? an organization that at the last moment somewhere will retreat, well, in the context of, for example, the use of nuclear weapons, yes , this is a favorite topic for him, and it is not, well, nato will not make any concessions there, russia will more precisely, for concessions to the russian federation, he will stop supporting ukraine, for example, but again, this is putin's irrational belief, which is not based on any facts. he believes that there will simply be a certain fatigue over long distances, and therefore, in this way, russia, well, at least in this confrontation, nato will be able to win, but this evolution is already understood and it is clear and obvious to everyone who is more or less somehow trying to analyze the situation that has developed, but to analyze from the rational standpoint of some positions of the russian leadership of such

there are no rational positions to date, but there is one nuance, already some part of the russian political elite, and we can see it from the statements and we can see it from a certain panic that even arises in them from time to time. well, during live broadcasts, the output of propaganda channels is already understanding that they have come to a dead end and that it will not be possible to resolve the situation in this way, which they respectively hope for and this is not bad in the end why because it weakens russia because some kind of centrifugal processes are starting in this very leadership there is already appearing there there are different groups of influence, and one of these groups believes that it is necessary to think about how to get out of this war with minimal losses, how to end this war accordingly, and this position does not coincide , for example, with putin's position, and he personally will continue to believe that he is still the situation will press, but this will only bring the end of russia and our immediate victory closer, and regarding the situation that was created when the transfer of the patriot complexes to ukraine and before this, regarding this contradiction that

arose in the statements of dmitry kuleb and the unnamed the representative of the ministry of defense what is the spiel referring to, in your opinion, how should it be interpreted because it looks very strange when the minister of foreign affairs says yes, we are discussing and the ministry of defense of germany says no, we are not discussing, that is, what does this mean, by the way, this is not the first situation that has arisen in relation to arms supplies in ukraine, when it is one thing, and individual representatives of one or another country speak differently about another, but let's look back, as a rule, it all ended with the supply ending with the supply ukraine has long-term armaments, which we talked about, so i think that at the political and diplomatic level, such conversations are really taking place. ukraine has officially made similar proposals. in germany, it did not reach them. why? because it

is discussed at the level of the foreign policy department of individual politicians or the coalition that is in the bundestag or the chancellor’s office directly, and here it is not. there is nothing to be surprised about. why, because this process is not simple in the end, it is sufficiently accomplished in time. the main thing is that ukraine speaks about it publicly, and i am convinced that these statements are made exclusively on the basis of some previous consultations, so we will sooner rather than later have some new they will provide additional information on this issue in the near future, and let's not forget that this is still a debatable issue at the level of nato itself or there are countries that are members of nato and members of the european union here, for example, this story between poland and germany is possible the germans are not very satisfied with the fact that the poles are also pushing them in this regard, and that is why they are currently taking such a waiting position, but i am convinced that this evolution that we are currently observing in relation to the attitudes of even the petrines will also have its continuation and at some point we these systems

we will have well, let's hope that this will happen as soon as possible because objectively ukraine really needs them and this could minimize the terror or, well, the potential - even potential future attacks that russia is currently preparing against ukraine and finally mr. retrovych, should you go to bed now or start your day already? i haven't decided yet, let's see while it's light. i think we should take advantage of the situation, on the one hand , save as much as possible, and this is absolutely the right position, on the other hand, have time to do the work that needs to be done. i want you to make the right decision. thank you , thank you for including the game interovych, a political scientist , a political consultant was in direct contact with us, butchers and armageddon, despite the traditional mystery surrounding the russian military more and more often, the leadership, the generals, began to publicly show in the soffits of russian propaganda, names, surnames, specific achievements and failures, why in the end the kremlin decided to

declassify them and who are these persons, and brikov will tell the chief olenor, rescuers, ranks, the head of the ministry of defense of russia, sergei shoigu, one of the main faces of the russian aggressive machine after since 2012, putin's supreme commander-in-chief has been checked by his first deputy and chief, second only to shoigu. valery gerasimo of the general staff, the real military brain of russian defense and attack, it is to him that the success of the operation in syria and the planning of the war in ukraine are attributed. the maximum and er, respectively, are also considered to be people. it is the gerasim who are actually . he is an ideologue and alone in the territory of the aggressed crimea and, accordingly, in the east of our country, some call it the so-called russian

lesia. but in 2022, the russian military scenario went according to plan and to save face and gerasimov's command of the war in ukraine was given to the syrian butcher oleksandr dvornikov, it was because of his leadership that the station in kramatorsk was fired upon. the bloodthirsty general was unable to achieve success at the front. is trying to blur the responsibility not only by me, but also by me. and we have a whole list of generals who are directly responsible for everything that is happening in ukraine, the signal for this was exactly putin's statement regarding the mobilization, when he directly said on tv that we are not starting this mobilization as the supreme commander-in-chief. and we are doing it

in the summer. removed and changed, which by no means had a strategic effect on the front , the case with colonel general oleksandr lapin, who until recently did not head the grouping of centers, was particularly revealing the occupation of the kharkiv region and the occupation of the armed forces of ukraine deep in the occupied territories of the luhansk region . polish information changes direction . opposing lobbies attacked criticism. it was necessary to outline the culprit, not putin, for the russians.

subordinates armageddon as an alleged demonstration of strength despite a rather motley biography with a criminal flavor. because it was under his command that the learned captain introduced the first armored column in moscow, when the so-called path took place, by the way, there is still a very complicated story about his use of service weapons, so according to experts, such stains on the biography make syroviks completely the kremlin, and shifting the blame to him will not require effort. anna brikova, we - ukraine marathon, the only news of all russian the generals shown in this plot are of course united by the fact that they are amazingly disgusting. well, i don't know where you could dig up such uniquely disgusting people, but considering that we are talking about russia, nothing surprising there is no country in that, the allies promised to increase the supply of weapons to ukraine, this was stated by the secretary general of nato and jenstonberg during the summit in bucharest, according to him, ukraine

will provide additional means of air defense and, i quote, advanced military equipment, ammunition, fuel and everything necessary for self-defense, end of quote it is known that the pentagon has already concluded a contract for the production of anti-aircraft missile systems for ukraine, in turn, nato countries have declared their readiness to invest in restarting production a soviet-era weapon system, and the first multiple-launch rocket systems have already arrived from france , which are a tracked analogue of khymars. at the same time, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro kuleba , is in no hurry to reveal the details of future deliveries. he says that he simply cannot announce specific countries and specific types of weapons, but he assured that the weapons will be many volodymyr dubovyk, director of the center for international studies at the department of international relations of the odessa national university named after mechnikov, joins our on the air, volodymyr, we congratulate you, i congratulate you. good day, good morning already, volodymyr, so we

are assured that there will be many weapons, but are they as many as we need ? to continue the offensive in ukraine, and what kind of weapons is this? it will probably be enough, but will it be enough for large-scale operations to liberate ukrainian lands or not? and this is already an open question, or are they still supplying, supplying little by little, even once we don't really understand what they say about self-defense, is it about the defense of those territories that we currently have under our control, or is it about such self-defense, the field there is to free all these occupied lands and renew our territorial integrity for now . weapons are supplied , very useful weapons, let's say anti-aircraft defense , are very possible for us right now, the question of principle is this, you know, because we really need to defend ourselves somehow from these

russian missiles, but will we have enough weapons in order to continue the offensive in the zaporizhia direction, in the kherson direction, to hold the lines in the donbas, and to move in the next donbas, but we do not know about this yet, because we hear about the fact that there is someone in the west who says that maybe in ukraine we still need to stop e- military actions to sit down at the negotiating table, even the american chairman of the joint chiefs of staff , mr. miley, seems to be such a stubborn person regarding russia, but now you will see a few weeks ago, including a few days ago, he said unexpectedly about what might happen in ukraine, it is already time to sit down at the negotiating table weapons are coming, weapons are useful, they are all suitable for us and necessary. but will it really be enough on such a scale that our armed forces can carry out large-scale offensive actions, this is still an open question , unfortunately for mr. dubovyk, in the context of these conversations about

receiving, not receiving, or transferring patriots to ukraine in your opinion, what political obstacles stand in the way of making this decision, considering that it is essentially a weapon that is used mainly for defense, that is, it can be used, obviously, during the offensive, but now, it seems to me that even theoretically it is very difficult to imagine that ukraine would advance somewhere with the help of patriots. well, here are a few points, first of all. i think that we are not talking about the fact that we will also use it for offensives or strikes on russian territory. and what will this cause the excavation of the russian side here i think another consideration, first of all, let's say this is a very modern, more or less technology, which they usually transfer to other countries that are allies or nato or such a special ally for america, as, say, israel another point is that they are afraid that these patrols may fall into the hands of the russians, and the third point is that they think that the ukrainians will probably master this technology for a very long time, although the last nine months have proven that the ukrainians very

quickly master all modern western military technologies that we are caught, and that's why i think there is a set of certain considerations here, who should pass , who should be the first. yes, because germany says maybe we are in poland because it is a nato ally, and then you write that the conversation about that is already starting. and maybe in ukraine let's say it's somewhat unconventional, because you see the simplification of internal supply mechanisms, for example, between nato allies, and the slightly complicated conditions for the transfer of weapons if they are transferred from a nato country to some country that is unscrupulous, such as ukraine in particular, although we currently have very intense relations between us to the nato blocs, but it’s all the same, there are slightly different mechanisms of ascension, bureaucratic, and so on. and in 20 countries from the 1930s to the one that supplies us with weapons, they announced last week that the amount of ammunition they already have are running out and soon they will not be able to supply us with anything, that is, there are only 10 left, and

nato secretary general jens stoltenberg, in particular, during the bucharest summit, he stated that countries need to increase the production of weapons, but we all know that this is not a one-month process, and it is possible that the production of some weapons will take years or not there are arms supplies to ukraine under threat in this sense, yes they are under threat because first of all, the first point i want to draw attention to is that no one in the west was preparing for such a large-scale war, which really resembles world war ii in its scale that is, no one has accumulated such stocks of weapons and such arsenals of weapons that ukraine now needs in order to somehow fight against russia on its own, this is the first moment, i think they understand themselves, this is a bit of a bell for them that it is necessary to increase the production of these types of weapons, even america is the most powerful according to the military state, the military state was emptying its warehouses, and where did

the elephant have these stinghirs or javelins or others? now they have new defense orders, and you are right , even those corporations that breed are these weapons, they say that it can be in a few years, only the american stockpile has been restored. therefore, this is a real problem, but russia also has it, because they are already close to using up all their arsenals, so they are now a little bit in their memory and are looking for what iran is there can give so that technical korea can give, because they too are running out of weapons, after all, collective arsenals and nato, where many countries have more than russian reserves, so the advantage here is still on the side of nato, which helps, which helps ukraine, therefore, after all, these states that still have some stockpiles of weapons, they hand them over to us , but the discussions are still going on, the question is whether they need to keep something for themselves if someone attacks them and others say well, who can attack is the biggest threat to us than russia now, even because it is in our interests

to support ukraine, which restrains russia, is at war with russia , that's why everything we have must be handed over to the ukrainians. and that's what the baltic countries think, that's what the poles did when they handed over hundreds of their tanks to us, and so on, because they understand that they're just protecting a ukrainian now in particular, the territory, the sovereignty of their countries, the territorial integrity from the russian professional threat, i would like to discuss with you another initiative of the international community. the european commission put forward a proposal to criminalize violations of sanctions against russia. in all member states it is known that the implementation of eu restrictive measures after the russian attack on ukraine demonstrated the difficulty of identifying assets belonging to oligarchs , and the easier it is to hide them through elaborate legal and financial structures. it is known that the proposed directive aims to establish the same level of fines in all member states . offenses will also cover the circumvention of eu restrictive measures by a certain member. what do you

think about this initiative of the european commission to criminalize violations? er, er, sanctions against er, the russian federation, how will it affect the financial ability of russia to launch a war against ukraine, the existence of which is definitely not, it will not stop it will not mean an absolute russian war. that at the very same moment russia will cease to have such an opportunity. i will continue to implement military actions, but it will make it very difficult for me. there are some not very convenient things that the russians use because of these sanctions, that's why the strengthening of the sanctions. yes, the settlement of the sanctions or the standardization of the sanction is very important for one country like the united states - it's easier, well, that one country. and when it is the european union, it is

still a lot of countries, so everything must be carefully coordinated here. i can also draw attention to the fact that today you probably already told the audience about this. finally, the european union has previously agreed that the price in russia for cars will be limited. it is also a very correct direction, or it is clear that if it is kept at 60, then russia will not receive a lot of money, and the problem is that, as we understand, they sell and continue to sell natural gas, oil, and for this money in the future, they will finance their war against ukraine , so it may be, you don't know, some decision by the european commission or some other that it will simply at one moment simply destroy everything and destroy russia and prevent it from carrying on, he will not carry out the war and not against ukraine, but all the same, this task is very complicated for russia, and they already have problems with it, and that is why the steps they are taking are in the right direction, mr. volodymyr, well, earlier, moscow declared that it

would not sell oil to those countries that will join this ceiling of oil prices, then tell me what to expect on the fifth of december, we will watch it , not immediately, these new rules of the european union will come into effect. well, if they don't sell, then they won't sell at all, they won't receive any production or there will be no profit from this, even then, this is their problem. they always say that we can refuse the european market, such as gas and oil, it is not a problem, we will find others, but this is all a bluff, because the european market is very important, russian economy, it was and remains so only asian or some alternative directions, they will not replace europe for them, if many countries really join these sanctions to limit the price and there will be unity and there will be consistency and there will be such consolidation, then this will be a serious and powerful blow to the russian interests. i think that in the end they will have to sell at those

prices that will be limited by this. thank you for joining our broadcast volodymyr dubovyk, director of the center for international studies associate professor of the department of international relations of the mechnikov odesa national university was with us on a direct phone call in this phone, the only marathon is going on, we are ukraine live on the air now, uh, important information, be sure to watch and we will be back in a few minutes, an art project that do not be afraid of the dark on the occasion of the 300th anniversary of hryhoriy skovoroda from december 3rd to 11th ukrainian home you will see how the light of freedom overcomes darkness the world of skovoroda this is the language of our ancestors kivchenka the language of the artist mlevych zimova

thousands of novels and scientific works, the language of the theater, the language of sports, it is the strongest language in the world, it was banned dozens of times, but it survived, it survived in poems , it survived in folk songs, it survived in the words of parents and words of love, this language sounded over three maidans, this language sounds in the trenches, so that this language could be heard in a coffee shop and by default heroes speak this language to heroes glory is the language of peace but this language is a weapon is the language of free and indomitable people it is the language of victory this is our native language the rules of a warm country kitchen thank you for

boiling only the necessary amount of water and i care warms better than a cup of the strongest tea we will beat the winter together the government has created a program there is a job that helps ukrainians get money for their own business the grant can be directed to starting a business or its development own garden or greenhouse studio or bakery many opportunities for dream work you just have an idea because you gave the documents the state supported it works for victory there is a job work in ukraine good and peaceful morning to everyone who is watching us or listening to us on the radio on the air marathon the only news we are ukraine on the clock